October 31, 2004

Bush Leads by Three in Dem-Skewing CBSNYT Poll
— Ace

This might be very good news indeed.

OTOH, Frank Luntz says that Bush needs to be up by at least three in order to win (due to new voters and late-undecideds voting against him, plus, you know, fraud), so if this poll is merely accurate, Bush is still only fifty-fifty to prevail.

The article is worth reading, because it does endeavor to spin this as really bad news for Bush.

It's not just news-- it's hilarious liberal desperation.

Update: But the New York Times goes, as usual, a little farther.

If any of you are fans of Mickey Kaus, you know that Times' reporter Adam Nagourney is their go-to guy for liberal cocooning. For example, when the last NYT poll in 2002 showed a massive movement towards Republicans, Nagourney buried that interesting finding until nearly the end of the article, and wrote some idiotic article about the polls' findings about voter anxiety and the like. He gave it the following headline:

Poll Finds Americans Like Cheese

Okay, not that, but something equally anodyne and boring. The New York Times "newspaper" deliberately refused to report its own discovery of actual news in order to not distress its archliberal constituency.

At any rate, the latest NYT poll finds that Bush is ahead by three-- cause for some alarm to liberals, given the poll's Democratic skew.

And what's the headline?

In Final Days, Divided Electorate Expresses Anxiety.

Once again, Nagourney deliberately avoids mention of the actual news-making part of the poll in favor of a non-newsworthy headline that won't discombobulate liberals too much.

The first two paragraphs:

The nation is girding for tomorrow's presidential election, worried about the integrity of the voting system, divided over the legitimacy of President Bush's election four years ago and anxious about the future no matter who wins the contest, according to the final New York Times/CBS News Poll of the 2004 campaign.

The poll shows that Mr. Bush and his opponent, Senator John Kerry, remain locked in a statistical tie as they head into the final 48 hours of the race. But the poll registered an increase in Mr. Bush's job approval rating, as well as an increase in the number of Americans who said the nation was heading in the right direction. Republicans described this as evidence that Mr. Bush was picking up speed in these closing days of the campaign, but Democrats dismissed the numbers, saying that both figures remain dangerously low for an incumbent.

Nagourney waits until the sixth paragraph to actually let you know Bush is up 49-46-- not really a "statistical tie" at all, because any statistician can tell you that any lead indicates at least the probability that one man is ahead, even if you can't be sure of the margin. This lead isn't big, but neither is it tiny.

Nagourney has waited far, far longer in his articles to inform his readers of what the poll actually says. He's slipping a bit. I expect better/worse from him.

Loose shit, Adam.

Posted by: Ace at 06:21 PM | Comments (12)
Post contains 516 words, total size 3 kb.

Pictorial Endorsement: Why You Must Vote For Bush
— Ace

Must read post from American Digest. You will not be disappointed.

Caution: Contains some very violent images, including the 9-11 attacks and the Paul Johnson beheading.

Thanks to See-Dubya for pointing out this needs a content warning.

Posted by: Ace at 05:34 PM | Comments (8)
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.

Lyric Fragment Quiz Answers
— Ace

Never got around to providing the answers to this quiz, but I guess George, Morpheus, Michelle and other readers got almost all of them. Still, just to make it official, here are the songs: more...

Posted by: Ace at 05:23 PM | Comments (8)
Post contains 478 words, total size 3 kb.

Hiring Picks Up in October
— Ace

Another 175,000 jobs likely added this month.

We sure seem to be adding a lot of new jobs given that we're in the worst economy since Herbert Hoover.

Thanks to Insty.

Posted by: Ace at 01:44 PM | Comments (11)
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.

Bush Picks Up Two Key Endorsements: Terry Bradshaw and Howie Long
— Ace

When JB read the stat that said whenever the Redskins lose before the election, the incumbent loses, Bradshaw began saying "Say it ain't so" while Long said "Ain't gonna happen."

Blaster Says Don't Worry About the Redskins Losing: "With the Sox winning, all sports predictors and curses are now null and void."

That sounds pretty good to me.

Posted by: Ace at 01:36 PM | Comments (13)
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.

More Foreign Leaders for Kerry
— Ace

Thanks again to GregS, who lives in Yahoo photos.

Posted by: Ace at 10:57 AM | Comments (2)
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.

Bin Ladin Admits Bush Is Winning in Unedited Tape
— Ace

Funny how that didn't seem to get much play on the MSM.

Thanks to Jim Lindgren of the Volokh Conspiracy.

Posted by: Ace at 10:55 AM | Comments (8)
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.

Like a Young Brett Favre
— Ace

Thanks to GregS.

Posted by: Ace at 08:56 AM | Comments (11)
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.

Kerry's Stepson Agrees: The problem is the J-E-W-S
— Ace

Pretty unbelievable.

At some point American Jews are probably going to notice that, while there is a lot of overt anti-semitism in more insular parts of the Heartland, the political left is filled with the not-so-stealth British version of polite and sophisticated Jew-hating.

Posted by: Ace at 07:27 AM | Comments (16)
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.

Nightmare Scenario
— Ace

What if the Electoral College splits 269-269 (it's actually quite possible; a lot of likely state splits will yield this result), and then the election is thrown into the House of Representatives?

No problem, you say. The Republicans control more state delegations and thus would elect Bush from the House in the event of a tie.

But that assumes that the Democrats don't refuse to come to Washington, DC, thus denying the House a lawful quorum. Which, based on the partisan hatred among leftists, and the previous gamesmanship in Texas, isn't too far-fetched.

What would happen? Would Hastert tell the Sergeant of Arms and the Federal Marshals to begin rounding up/arresting runaway Democrats and holding them prisoner in the well of the Congress?

Would the Supreme Court be forced to intervene-- again -- and make the controversial decision that, given a refusal to comply with Constitutional requirements, the normal rules of quorum are temporarily suspended?

Could the Democrats negotiate for some prize-- like a Democratic Vice-President, in exchange for their cooperation?

Posted by: Ace at 07:21 AM | Comments (10)
Post contains 175 words, total size 1 kb.

<< Page 1 >>
75kb generated in CPU 0.1602, elapsed 0.5772 seconds.
46 queries taking 0.5621 seconds, 153 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.