4,600 more "ballots" were counted in Milwaukee than that city has actual living registered voters. Thousands of illegal votes were cast, by those voting multiple times, by those stripped of the right to vote by operation of the law (i.e., felons), and by those stripped of the right to vote by biological failure (i.e., corpses).

Doesn't matter much to Democratic Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle, who has vetoed bills to require an ID when casting ballots. Well, okay, I guess maybe that's "extreme." How about we compromise on a bill that requires an actual pulse?

The Democratic Party

Valiantly fighting to preserve the voting rights of America's "Forgotten Minority" -- the dead.

On the plus side, immortality is just a signature away. All you need to do is register as a Democrat in a machine-controlled city.

Posted by: Ace at 05:01 AM | Comments (16)
Post contains 143 words, total size 1 kb.

Was the show any good? No idea. I'm just happy I didn't break down into a full-on quavering panic attack, which seemed like a very real possibility around 1:30 PM. Karol was, thankfully, there to tell me "You're not going to freak out, and if you do, so what? It's good broadcasting to hear an on-air meltdown."

It went by so fast. Didn't get to half of our questions, but I guess overpreparing is better than underpreparing.

Next week: More zany sound effects. Gave them too little time for all the "Explore the studio space" and "Where's Joe?" and "I want to go craaaazy on you" effects I wanted.

On lowering expectations Hey, it worked for Bush.

Thanks for listening, and thanks for all your support and constructive criticism.

Replay: I am informed that the show replays every hour, on the hour (in progress). The show actually begins at five past the hour; the first five minutes is a news update and commercials. Just go to Rightalk and find the logo for Hoist the Black Flag.

Actually, you can listen at any time, as it's always just replaying in progress. But then you miss out on our, uhhhh, stellar opening remarks.

Posted by: Ace at 01:20 PM | Comments (107)
Post contains 203 words, total size 1 kb.

Over at Karol's site she has a photo of our den of incompetence. She said "Do you want your panic pill pics in frame?"

I said, "Sure. It's what I'm known for."

As there's a 75% chance of a full-blown panic melt-down, make sure you call at 1 866 884 TALK (8255). I don't know if I'll get to your calls; if I do, it means I'm panicking and trying to avoid speaking.

This is going to be fun.

Not.

Posted by: Ace at 10:39 AM | Comments (217)
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.

Just to cut out the middleman, we've already scheduled our painful cancellation to follow three weeks later. As Allah's haiku had it:

Hoist the Black Flag
Three weeks later
Hoist the White Flag

It's funny because it's true.

Guests: Michelle Malkin, James Taranto

Karol and I will be talking about the New York Times admission of bias, the split between social cons and libertarian-leaning cons, why liberals are judgmental about everything except sex, and, as promised Michelle Malkin's Secret Shame.

Hoist the Black Flag debuts today at 4 PM Eastern Time on Rightalk radio, and repeated every hour on the hour thereafter.

God willing.

I don't want to say too much about the dirt I've dug up on Michelle, but just to tease it, let's say that it has something to do with a guy whose name rhymes with "Barry Bybax."

Posted by: Ace at 08:30 AM | Comments (98)
Post contains 159 words, total size 1 kb.

The Urban Grind is a bit down on it all, feeling it's just another example of the Art of Outrage. But I've always had a taste for the macabre, myself.

Three tours of preserved corpses are touring the US:

The corpses in all the exhibits were preserved through “plastination,” which replaces body fluids with liquid plastic. The plastic is hardened, leaving tissues intact. Bodies can then be displayed without formaldehyde or glass containers, so onlookers can come within inches of exposed organs.

More gory details at the link.

A cheap and macabrely-lurid thrill masquerading as art and/or science? Probably. Almost certainly, actually.

But hell, they're dead anyway. They were once used for a legitimate medical purposes; if sick bastards like me can't help but want to gawk, why not?

Posted by: Ace at 09:43 PM | Comments (28)
Post contains 139 words, total size 1 kb.

The Gray Lady Blinks; Who's Next?

Young Media has taken out some juicy Old Media targets. Rather. Jordan. Raines. (And, of course, the left-leaning Young Media nailed an even bigger target: Gannon.)

But the juiciest target of all -- the biggest establishment liberal institution in America (with the possible exception of the entire state of Massachusetts) -- just said "I give."

I only skimmed the Times article about the findings of its own internal review on building credibility. Quite frankly, the article seemed boring and technical.

That was deliberate, I think. The writer was determined to break as little news about the Times' "Credibility Group's" findings as possible.

And the dependable Kathlene Q. Seelye did that job superbly. Here's how she opens her snoozer:

In order to build readers' confidence, an internal committee at The New York Times has recommended taking a variety of steps, including having senior editors write more regularly about the workings of the paper, tracking errors in a systematic way and responding more assertively to the paper's critics.

The committee also recommended that the paper "increase our coverage of religion in America" and "cover the country in a fuller way," with more reporting from rural areas and of a broader array of cultural and lifestyle issues.

Pretty much the print equivalent of a very bored looking cop waving "Move on, move on, nothing to see here."

And then she breaks out the high-power animal tranquilizers:

As examples, the report cited limiting anonymous sources, reducing factual errors and making a clearer distinction between news and opinion. It also said The Times should make the paper's operations and decisions more transparent to readers through methods like making transcripts of interviews available on its Web site.

The report also said The Times should make it easier for readers to send e-mail to reporters and editors. "The Times makes it harder than any other major American newspaper for readers to reach a responsible human being," the report said.

About as compelling as reading stereo instructions badly translated from the original Mongolian.

But the actual report that article purports to fairly digest is a hell of a lot more interesting -- and more damning of past Times' practices -- than Ms. Seelye would have the casual reader believe.

Sample quotes (emphases added in all):

Though we have our lapses, individual news stories on emotional topics like abortion, gun control, the death penalty and gay marriage are reported and edited with great care, to avoid any impression of bias. Nonetheless, when numerous articles use the same assumption as a point of departure, that monotone can leave the false impression that the paper has chosen sides.

This is especially so when we add in our feature sections, whose mission it is to write about novelty in life. As a result, despite the strict divide between editorial pages and news pages, The Times can come across as an advocate. The public editor found that the overall tone of our coverage of gay marriage, as one example, “approaches cheerleading.” By consistently framing the issue as a civil rights matter -- gays fighting for the right to be treated like everyone else -- we failed to convey how disturbing the issue is in many corners of American social, cultural and religious life.

I should note that this admission of the Times' advocacy on the issue is itself nevertheless written from the viewpoint of bias. Notice how those who oppose gay marriage are not granted any sort of intellectual or philosophical objection to the practice -- no, "The Credibility Group" can only allow that we are overcome by emotionalism, that the paper has failed to recognize "how disturbing" the issue is to us.

Nevertheless, the admission that the paper has been a "cheerleader" for gay marriage, has covered it one-sidedly, and has all but ignored even the "disturbed" opponents of gay marriage is a step in the right direction.

Too often we label whole groups from a perspective that uncritically accepts a stereotype or unfairly marginalizes them. As one reporter put it, words like moderate or centrist “inevitably incorporate a judgment about which views are sensible and which are extreme.”

We often apply “religious fundamentalists,” another loaded term, to political activists who would describe themselves as Christian conservatives. We particularly slip into these traps in feature stories when reporters and editors think they are merely presenting an interesting slice of life, with little awareness of the power of labels. We need to be more vigilant about the choice of language not only in the text but also in headlines, captions and display type.

Haven't bloggers and conservative media critics generally been making just this point for the past 15 years? If not longer?

And how about this?:

In part because the TimesÂ’s editorial page is clearly liberal, the news pages do need to make more effort not to seem monolithic. Both inside and outside the paper, some people feel that we are missing stories because our staff lacks diversity in viewpoints, intellectual grounding and individual backgrounds. We should look for all manner of diversity. We should seek talented journalists who happen to have military experience, who know rural America first hand, who are at home in different faiths.

Sounds like ideas that have been suggested in the blogosphere -- and elsewhere before Al Gore invented the Internet, of course -- many times before.

So: We were right after all.

I guess that's why the Times felt compelled to run an screed inveighing against the loose ethics of bloggers. When you're admitting this much of the bloggers' case against the MSM, sheer ego requires you to try to take a bite out of your harassers.

Pimping My Streaming-Audio Ride: Karol and I will be talking about this at the top of our new show, Hoist the Black Flag, debuting today at 4 PM Eastern Time on Rightalk radio, and repeated every hour on the hour thereafter.

God willing.

PS, we've got Michelle Malkin and James Taranto.

I don't want to say too much about the dirt I've dug up on Michelle, but just to tease it, let's say that it has something to do with a guy whose name rhymes with "Barry Bybax."

Posted by: Ace at 07:29 PM | Comments (37)
Post contains 1059 words, total size 7 kb.

Well, Riehl World View had some time on his hands. He's mashed up video of liberals and Democrats with some very inappropriate audio.

Light content warning... couple of F-bombs, bit of Pat O'Brien. Definitely worth checking out.

The Nancy Pelosi and Hillary! Rodham-Clinton parts are priceless.

Posted by: Ace at 06:07 PM | Comments (2)
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.

The Sins lists it under "Pride," but "Lust" is more like it.

Lust... and Wrath, baby. A delicious little cocktail of passion. And robotronic ass-kicking.

Posted by: Ace at 02:51 PM | Comments (28)
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.

Thanks again to NickS.

By the way, Star Wars III seems like it's going to actually be good.

Amazingly enough.

Posted by: Ace at 12:38 PM | Comments (12)
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.

Accounting students begin with "Accounting" on their mortarboards, but when the "Governor" takes the stage, they switch up their message.

Thanks to NickS.

Posted by: Ace at 11:52 AM | Comments (16)
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.