The Associated Press apparently the pirates. They bring hope and change.

...in an impoverished country where every public institution has crumbled, they have become heroes in the steamy coastal dens they operate from because they are the only real business in town...

...In Haradhere, residents came out in droves to celebrate as the looming oil ship came into focus this week off the country's lawless coast. Businessmen started gathering cigarettes, food and cold glass bottles of orange soda, setting up small kiosks for the pirates who come to shore to re-supply almost daily.

Dahir said she is so confident in the pirates, she instituted a layaway plan just for them.

"They always take things without paying and we put them into the book of debts," she told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. "Later, when they get the ransom money, they pay us a lot."...

..."Regardless of how the money is coming in, legally or illegally, I can say it has started a life in our town," said Shamso Moalim, a 36-year-old mother of five in Haradhere.

"Our children are not worrying about food now, and they go to Islamic schools in the morning and play soccer in the afternoon. They are happy."

If one were just a bit cynical, they might cite this as an independent validation of how trickle down economics would really work in an unregulated economy.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at 07:42 PM | Comments (116)
Post contains 248 words, total size 2 kb.

Missed it by that much.

People Magazine, a publication that oddly carries more credibility these days than a Gay Gossip and Antisemitic Conspiracy Newsletter has named Mr. Hugh Jackman (a close, personal friend of mine) the Sexiest Man Alive.

Well, I'm happy for my friend Hugh. I just wanted to kick one of those hypothetical questions out to the morons tonight. Who's the Sexiest Man Not Alive?

Don't think of it as some kind of "test" or something. Imagine yourself in a time machine. Wearing a tight pink sweater. Go with that.

...

sexiest man alive below the fold...

UPDATE: now we're rolling..

176 okay: Chest Hair or No Chest Hair? The People site had some quite nice pics as well as their sexiest men.
Posted by: CInAz at November 19, 2008 10:58 PM (BhJB2)

say it. you know you want to.

more...

Posted by: Dave in Texas at 04:01 PM | Comments (378)
Post contains 178 words, total size 1 kb.

I can't really sum the story up more than that.

Who ya gonna believe, my sockpuppets or your lyin' eyes?

Posted by: Ace at 03:23 PM | Comments (61)
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.

You have to see the picture to believe it.

Kinda hard to "divine voter intent" there, I admit.

Thanks to ThomasM.

Posted by: Ace at 02:39 PM | Comments (75)
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.

No one can doubt his qualifications and experience.

The mug-shots of the new mayor;
voters said he had that sort of "honest, reliable" look
of a man who might slip ruffies to your underage daughter,
but would "man up" to it at sentencing

Incidentally, the article doesn't mention the party affiliation of either the outgoing mayor Ronda Bennett or the incoming felon. It could just be that this race was nonpartisan -- but I have my suspicions. (And that t-shirt is something he wore in his mug-shots -- it doesn't have anything to do with his party, unless he was planning on running while being booked for meth possession and thought his mug shot might increase publicity and increase name recognition.)

Oregon also elected a tranny as mayor.

Pretty much Oregon is just going through the character roster of Con Air and electing people kinda like them.

I've always thought Cyrus the Virus was a man who could get things done.

Thanks to "Bubba Thudd."

Posted by: Ace at 02:22 PM | Comments (57)
Post contains 185 words, total size 1 kb.

Sure why not.

When Barney Frank demanded billions to subsidize high-risk mortgages, that seemed to work out pretty freakin' nicely for everyone.

Posted by: Ace at 02:10 PM | Comments (82)
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.

Check out these bouncy, pointed ads ( this one and ones below it) against Chambliss' opponent Jim Martin.

Kinda good. They're negative ads-- but they don't feel that way, thanks to the Peanuts-esque piano.

As a law and order guy, I like yesterday's ad better. more...

Posted by: Ace at 01:47 PM | Comments (8)
Post contains 78 words, total size 1 kb.

Warden sends this with a not very nice reorganization plan:

Step One: Eat Shit UAW

Step Two: Die

A bit harsh. But what on earth do these people -- the union, and management which bowed to the union -- expect when they're doing insane things like this?

And any "bailout" (really a permanent taxpayer subsidy of far too high UAW wages) simply goes to keeping nonsense like this in place.

And don't say their wages are "far too high" as some sort of judgment about the value of their work. I say they're far too high based on the objective fact that they cannot produce a competitive product at those rates. And add in that non-union plants in the South and other areas of the country pay their workers $43.00 per hour in total benefits -- a pretty decent wage for manufacturing work requiring little previous skill -- while the UAW insists on $73.00 per hour.

You get almost double what other workers are willing to work for why, exactly? I can't imagine any moral claim to such rates.

As a reader pointed out, we can buy good American-made cars -- but they come from Japanese or Korean companies operating plants in non-UAW shops.

From a 2005 article:

Ken Pool is making good money. On weekdays, he shows up at 7 a.m. at Ford Motor Co.'s Michigan Truck Plant in Wayne, signs in, and then starts working -- on a crossword puzzle. Pool hates the monotony, but the pay is good: more than $31 an hour, plus benefits.

"We just go in and play crossword puzzles, watch videos that someone brings in or read the newspaper," he says. "Otherwise, I've just sat."

Pool is one of more than 12,000 American autoworkers who, instead of installing windshields or bending sheet metal, spend their days counting the hours in a jobs bank set up by Detroit automakers and Delphi Corp. as part of an extraordinary job security agreement with the United Auto Workers union.

The jobs bank programs were the price the industry paid in the 1980s to win UAW support for controversial efforts to boost productivity through increased automation and more flexible manufacturing.

As part of its restructuring under bankruptcy, Delphi is actively pressing the union to give up the program.

With Wall Street wondering how automakers can afford to pay thousands of workers to do nothing as their market share withers, the union is likely to hear a similar message from the Big Three when their contracts with the UAW expire in 2007 -- if not sooner.

"It's an albatross around their necks," said Steven Szakaly, an economist with the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor. "It's a huge number of workers doing nothing. That has a very large effect on their future earnings outlook."

General Motors Corp. has roughly 5,000 workers in its jobs bank. Delphi has about 4,000 in its version of the same program. Some 2,100 workers are in DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group's job security program. Ford had 1,275 in its jobs bank as of Sept. 25. The pending closure of Ford's assembly plant in Loraine, Ohio, could add significantly to that total. Those numbers could swell in coming years as GM and Ford prepare to close more plants.

Detroit automakers declined to discuss the programs in detail or say exactly how much they are spending, but the four-year labor contracts they signed with the UAW in 2003 established contribution caps that give a good idea of the size of the expense.

According to those documents, GM agreed to contribute up to $2.1 billion over four years. DaimlerChrysler set aside $451 million for its program, along with another $50 million for salaried employees covered under the contract. Ford, which also maintained responsibility for Visteon Corp.'s UAW employees, agreed to contribute $944 million.

Of course, if you're paying these guys that much anyway, you could require them to, say, put finished cars through more rigorous quality control checks, a zero-defects program, and fix all those cars that come short, at least getting some degree of bang back on your dollar.

But that's not what the union demanded. The union demanded, I guess, either the same work at the same pay or no work at reduced pay.

They extracted this in exchange for "more flexibility in manufacturing" -- which I take to mean reassigning, say, a welder no longer needed to window installation, where he was needed. The unions famously make all sorts of nonsensical demands like this -- who really cares what they do on the floor if they're getting paid? -- but then they only relent on the idiotic demand when extracting more concessions and demanding more money.

These are not bona-fide "demands" and should not be treated as such. It shouldn't take "management concessions" to move a guy from engine installation, where he's not needed, to transmission installation, where he is.

The goose that laid the golden egg went out of business, too, after it increased its labor costs to $300 per golden egg, each of which could be sold for only $250.

But geese don't understand math. At least they have an excuse.

This is like the once-a-decade baseball strike. You start by siding with the players... yeah, management really is making a lot of money... but then you realize the average starting player is making something like $700,000 per year and the average salary for a veteran is in the millions and you quickly decide you don't care who wins and who loses, but both should just shut up and stop with the PR statements and attempting to elicit your support.

These people are being paid good money. With a 15% pay cut and say a 10% reduction in health care and pension benefits, they would still be among the highest paid workers in the country.

Yes, I support blue-collar workers getting as much out of management as is economically feasible-- but no more than that. Past that point and I'm expected to begin paying a fraction of their salaries, aren't I?, because management simply can't afford it.

You guys work it out yourselves. Don't whine to me about an average salary of $100,000. I don't make anywhere near $100,000. Maybe you guys should consider subsidizing those who make less.

Detroit cannot be saved. Move Detroit to South Carolina, Tennessee, Arkansas, etc., and the American auto industry might have a chance.

It's Old: Article dates from 2005. I assume nothing has changed. Nothing ever does.

Thanks to a reader for pointing that out.

Posted by: Ace at 01:22 PM | Comments (117)
Post contains 1135 words, total size 7 kb.

After all, we haven't given him a chance.

I admit-- this is quite a change from the left's position when Bush was elected.

I seem to remember that back in 2000, criticizing the president elect was patriotic. The very tip-top gold-standard highest form of patriotism, in fact (easily eclipsing just plain old "real patriotism" as far as patrioticitude).

Now it's the opposite.

Remarkable. I never thought I'd live to see the day.

Oh wait -- yes I did. It was utterly predictable.

Oh, this buffoon, who thinks global warming causes earthquakes (for real, yo), also says that Sarah Palin is an airhead.

Posted by: Ace at 12:53 PM | Comments (87)
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.

World's swankiest rooms with a view.

Dude:

Posted by: Ace at 12:04 PM | Comments (32)
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.