I dodged this story as being lame, but this quote is... odd. Campaigning in Philly's gay bars, Chelsea got her ass grabbed by a lesbian. A man also gives her ass the thumbs up.

"I grabbed her ass," shouted one woman, prompting surprised looks and laughter from Chelsea and campaign staff escorting her.

...

"I think Chelsea looks better in person and she's got the body and ass of life," said Christoper Murray after wrapping his arms around her and giving her a big hug.

Thanks to Rob.

Posted by: Ace at 05:41 AM | Comments (70)
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.

Another neocon on Bush's payroll, I guess.

Osama bin Laden's chief deputy on Tuesday denied a theory that Israel carried out the Sept. 11 attacks and blamed Iran and Shiite Hezbollah for spreading the idea to discredit the Sunni al-Qaida's strike against the U.S.

The comments in a recording posted on an Islamic Web site reflected the increasing criticism by al-Qaida's No. 2 leader Ayman al-Zawahri against Iran. Al-Zawahri has accused Iran in recent messages of seeking to extend its power in the Middle East, particularly in Iraq and through its Hezbollah allies in Lebanon.

...

Al-Zawahri accused Hezbollah's Al-Manar television of starting the rumor.

"The purpose of this lie is clear — (to suggest) that there are no heroes among the Sunnis who can hurt America as no else did in history. Iranian media snapped up this lie and repeated it," he said.

"Heroes."

Posted by: Ace at 05:27 AM | Comments (19)
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.

An MSNBC relationship columnist explains the key to domestic bliss is treating your husband like a misbehaving child in need of a scolding.

Here's Dr. Helen quoting her, with Dr. Helen interrupting for a chuckle:

I admit that my husband helps out more than many men, but here’s another news flash: It isn’t because he’s such a fabulously enlightened being. Left to his own devices, he would doubtless park himself in front of the TV like some sitcom male-chauvinist couch potato while I did all the work. The reason Jeremy “helps” as much as he does (an offensive terminology that itself suggests who’s really being held responsible) is simple: He doesn’t have a choice.

Â…So how have I accomplished this? By holding my husbandÂ’s feet to the fire every single day of our lives, of course.

Yes, dear readers, itÂ’s true: Maintaining some semblance of parity in your marriage requires you to deploy the same kinds of nasty tactics you swore you would never stoop to as a parent but nonetheless found yourself using the minute you actually had a kid. Bribery and punishment work; so do yelling and complaining. Threats are also effective, as long as everyone knows you mean business. With husbands, tender blandishments and nooky are particularly useful, as is the withholding of the aforementioned.

[Dr. Helen:] That this chauvinistic writer is angry that her husband will not scrub the toilet bowl at her command, yet she thinks of herself as oppressed is laughable:

The fact that guys, when left to their own devices, rarely rush to offer more toilet-scrubbing and diaper-changing is not in itself surprising. As Martin Luther King Jr. once observed, “We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”

So why aren't women demanding something closer to parity? While many are resigned to seething in silence, the stakes are far higher than they seem to realize. When wives permit their husbands to shirk a fair share of the homemaking and parenting, not only do they themselves suffer, but chances are good that they’re also sentencing their children to a similar fate. When you have kids, everything you do teaches them how to live their own lives when they grow up. Unfortunately, all too many women are still teaching their children that “woman is the nigger of the world,” as John Lennon and Yoko Ono put it so memorably in a song lyric years ago. And what too many fathers teach their sons and daughters is that men can get away with dumping the scut work on their wives, and that women will grit their teeth and put up with it.

More:

When my husband has lingered too long over the sports section and I’m feeling overwhelmed by the number of errands that must be run, I hand him a list. “This is what I need you to do today,” I say in a tone of voice that brooks no equivocation. He may moan and groan, but the jobs get done. And while I still have to mastermind the operation — somehow he is never the one who remembers that our son needs new mosquito netting, baseball cleats, and basketball shoes for sleepaway camp…

Â…in my experience husbands are a lot like children. They will get away with whatever they can get away with. When you put your foot down and make it clear that you wonÂ’t take no for an answer, somehow the kidsÂ’ rooms get cleaned, the groceries bought, the laundry folded. It really does work, I promise.

Dr. Helen and Rachel Lucas disagree.

Here's Rachel, um, I mean Ms. Lucas:

Another thing I’ll be sure never to do, from now on as I fully manifest my inner bitch-martyr, is to ever stop for one fucking MINUTE to think about how I am singlehandedly causing every young man who reads my articles to run screaming in terror the minute a girl utters the word “marriage” to him. I will not worry that my words do nothing but a disservice to other women, confirming ugly stereotypes and mens’ worst fears about taking on a wife. It’s not MY problem if men are too weak and immature to sign up for a life closely resembling a forced death march.

Dr. Helen:

I have some advice for your long suffering husband, Jeremy. Next time you need something fixed around the house, your wife needs help lifting something, or you need a blowjob, resort to yelling and complaining. Threats are also effective, as long as she knows you mean business. Huff and puff and complain to all of your friends about her inadequacies and let the world know what a loser she is. Then crow about your newfound equality. Finally, call yourself a hero and write a lousy piece for Men's Health or some other men's magazine about your loser of a wife and see how your married life takes off after that. For deep down, even if Jeremy won't admit it, my guess is, just like the women mentioned in the article, he is seething inside. It's no wonder he won't scrub toilets for this woman.

It is true men are lazier about housework. This isn't fair, I guess, but there is a mitigating factor: We don't give a shit about cleanliness. Or, to be more nuanced than that, we do care about a de minimis level of basic suitability for human habitation but beyond that it's just gravy. Sometimes literally gravy, like on the floor, hardened into an attractive dollop of animal fat that makes for instant conversation starter.

Men and women simply have differing opinions as to what constitutes "clean enough." Quite frankly, doing half of what you ask in this regard is already quite a compromise, because, honestly, It looks fine to us, honey.

No, we're not just saying that. We mean that. It looks fine to us, honey.

Sink's got a bit of orange-ish mold growing around the drain? Shrug. Last time I looked it hadn't grown tentacles and began reaching out rip my face off. It's just the wonder of nature. Circle of life. Chain of being. Didn't you always say you wanted to go on nature-walks, hon? Well there you go. I made you your own private nature walk right in the head.

Soap scum building up along the rim of the tub? Um, it's soap, baby. Scum or not, it's soap. That means it's pure cleanliness, cleanliness in diatomic elemental form. Clean up the soap? What, are you crazy? That's counterproductive. If anything we should be trying to plaster the whole house in soap scum.

Women don't get this. We have a divergence of opinion on what constitutes clean (or livably messy); who says you win this argument?

And if it bothers you so much: You do it. You're the one gaining the benefit of it.

Ever here of marginal utility? Comparative advantage? It's not like I'm demanding you sit on my fucking XBOX 360 and participate in my Medal of Honor guild so I can rise up from lieutenant to captain. I know my interests are my own; why can't you accept the same thing about your interests?

And yes, I know you're using your "sarcastic voice," but as a matter of fact I did intentionally hang my dirty gym sock off the lamp-shade.

I thought it added "a punch of color" to the room -- dingy gray and three orange stripes -- and a much-needed burst of visual "pop."

If that's not your idea of decor, fine, I give you permission to move it, but don't make me move it.

You're lucky I'm willing to compromise my artistic vision of the room's ambiance for your happiness. Quite frankly that sock was the only thing pulling this whole room together.

But as to the real, bigger point: As was said of Tom in Miller's Crossing, "I've never met anyone who made being a son-of-a-bitch such a point of pride."

Feminism seems to be teaching women that narcissism, unpleasantness, selfishness, and hectoring, nagging, domineering, insufferable behavior are somehow virtues to be praised.

Posted by: Ace at 05:30 PM | Comments (167)
Post contains 1370 words, total size 8 kb.

Obama's taking flack for the cancellation of the proposed North Carolina Democratic debate. Of course, he's blaming Clinton and it's all very he-said, she-said. But it's still a popcorn moment:

A statement released by the state party today cites the “time constraints and logistical issues associated with such a large, national event” as the reason. From the release: “While there was great interest in the debate, there were also growing concerns about what another debate would do to party unity.

Heh. The first rule of Fight Club is you do not talk about Fight Club. Because God forbid you keep making asses of yourselves in public. Shee-it.

This would have been the 22nd Democratic debate. Katie Couric is all broken up because she's the only nightly news bobble-head who hasn't helmed one.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at 05:00 PM | Comments (44)
Post contains 142 words, total size 1 kb.

Patriot's Day in Boston means the marathon and day baseball at Fenway.

This guy won't forget today's game for awhile...mostly because his friends aren't likely to let him.

Bill Buckner could not be reached for comment.

UPDATE [Dave in Texas]: Way better hold.

I know. It's old. It's also goofy sports day at AoSHQ.

Posted by: DrewM at 02:04 PM | Comments (15)
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.

One of the key sources making the case that McCain just can't be trusted?

A Truther.

Stay classy, Washington Post.

Posted by: Ace at 01:13 PM | Comments (41)
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.

Skip down to the two last entries about being a terrorist and his refusal to apologize for previous terrorism if you want the money grafs.

More... A July 4th greeting from Obama's buddy.

Posted by: Ace at 12:58 PM | Comments (15)
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.

In another example today of the State colliding with people's belief systems, the UK is poised to crack down on psychics, mediums, and other spiritualists for false advertising:

Fortune-tellers, mediums and spiritual healers marched on the home of the British prime minister at Downing Street on Friday to protest against new laws they fear will lead to them being "persecuted and prosecuted".

Organizers say that replacing the Fraudulent Mediums Act of 1951 with new consumer protection rules will remove key legal protection for "genuine" mediums.

They think skeptics might bring malicious prosecutions to force spiritualists to prove in court that they can heal people, see into the future or talk to the dead.

Psychics also fear they will have to give disclaimers describing their services as entertainment or as scientific experiments with unpredictable results.

I think they're probably right to worry. Didn't Florida get Miss Cleo's promoters for fraudulent advertising? The UK could be going the same route.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at 12:49 PM | Comments (33)
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.

They told me in George Bush's America artists would be forced to recant their very artworks, and they were right!

Posted by: Ace at 12:37 PM | Comments (22)
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.

Internet Detective Kevin Drum of The Washington Monthly is facing a stone-cold mystery, as reported by Dave Price:

The New York Times reports that Muqtada al-SadrÂ’s Mahdi Army has mostly melted away in Basra. Nobody quite knows why.

That is a real head-scratchin' puzzler, I'll allow.

Contributing to his befuddlement is the "fact" he offers that the Maliki government is more pro-Iran than Sadr has "ever been," despite the fact that Sadr gets his orders from Iran and takes refuge there while Maliki's IA is killing Iran-backed Sadrists by the barrel full.

It reminds me of the MSM's refusal to report on the amazing stabilization in Iraq after the surge began. We're just not sure it's a trend, they claimed.

When the facts seem to run counter to your metanarrative, throw your hands up in the air and claim confusion as to what these nonsensical and contradictory data could possibly mean.

That's "nuance in action" for you.

Kevin Drum and his ilk have no problem discerning precisely what an aggressive Mahdi Army might mean. But a retreating one? In that case, it's all just far too complicated for him to get a handle on.

Oh, and there's this: high ranking Shiite Ayatollah issues fatwa against Mahdi Army, proclaiming only the legitimate government has the moral and legal right to carry arms and use force.

There they go again, talkin' in riddles!

Posted by: Ace at 09:45 AM | Comments (38)
Post contains 243 words, total size 2 kb.