November 22, 2004
— Ace Or rather, they're going to make it illegal for DVD players to allow a home consumer to skip past advertisements.
This article doesn't say which party is behind this -- and likely it's both, given how much the Democrats rely on Hollywood -- but it is absolutely incomprehensible to me that Republicans are behaving so corruptly.
Oh, I'm not surprised that a politician behaves corruptly, liberal or conservative. Don't get me wrong. I expect a little -- well, a lot of -- corruption in politics.
I'm surprised at the shamelessness and stupidity of it.
They will catch hell for this. Not that it's such a major deal, but because it's 1) a corrupt deal made with the politically powerful for no very good reason and 2) intrusive nanny-statism and 3) pissing off consumers.
They will be forced to drop the provision. But not before a great deal of embarassment and political damage.
Can't they see more than three feet down the road? Do they think they've now got the Congress just about locked up for the next 60 years, automatically, like the Democrats did from the thirties to nineties?
What the hell are Republicans doing 1) empoweing Congression staffers to view IRS returns, at the behest of the IRS and 2) disempowering the public from skipping annoying commercials, at the behest of Hollywood? Is that what they're thinking they were elected to do?
Both cases are examples of that French saying: It's worse than a crime. It's a mistake.
Posted by: Ace at
05:23 PM
| Comments (23)
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.
— Ace Yeahp, he's Number One with a bullet (a hefty, haunchy bullet, I imagine) on the "Frigid 50" list of celebrities we can get enough of.

Look at him. He's got the commanding presence and raw animal magnetism of a young Bill Shatner.
Film Threat opines:
"The Frigid 50 ice pack have left audiences cold with their overbearing personalities, poor career choices and chronic inability to stop making fools of themselves," the site said.Moore qualified because of what the editors saw as an oversized ego. "Message to Michael: Remember, it's not always about you. Lose the chip on your shoulder," the editors said.
Halle Berry was rated as #2. Yeah, different sort of body type and everything.
But honestly? She's boring. I can't argue with that call. A good-looking woman that just leaves you blah.
Power Line Actually Bothered to Read the Original Piece, and Look At What Riches They Found Update: Ben Affleck at Number 10.
Man, these Film Threat guys are making me feel all warm and tingly.
Posted by: Ace at
04:58 PM
| Comments (6)
Post contains 182 words, total size 1 kb.
— Ace David Brock's Soros-funded Willis-employing idiocy machine Media Matters has a transcript of Hume contemptuously laughing at Juan Williams, and condescending to him. They think it's a bad thing.
You'll think it's pretty funny. It's so damn dismissive and insulting, kinda like the pimp-slapping beat-down at the beginning of Streets of Fire.
No need to give David Brock traffic, however, as Free Republic has posted the whole article.
Brit Hume has been pretty cocky lately, and he seems to be gloating almost openly. From calling Kerry's concession-speech claim that he was the representative of a "political movement" a "load of crap," to reading the words of liberals with a whiny, bitchy, effeminate tone, to just giggling at everything Juan Williams says-- Brit Hume represents everything that's wrong with modern journalism.
But if that's wrong, baby, I don't want to be right.
Media Matters wants you to contact Brit Hume and, I guess, yell at him or something. I say drop him an email at brit.hume@foxnews.com and let him know he's doing a man's job.
I will not be satisfied until he actually goes all Sergeant Hulka on Williams and calls him a "gutless.. punk" on live TV.
Posted by: Ace at
04:43 PM
| Comments (16)
Post contains 212 words, total size 1 kb.
— Ace I guess it's kind of a service to us. Thanks, CNN!
I saw it mentioned that CNN had a new chief. I didn't much care either way. But Kausfiles notes that the new CNN chief is none other than Jonathan Klein, he of "a bunch of guys in their pajamas" infamy.
CNN -- Klein -- Rather. All in one place. Could we even contemplate such a convenience? It's like one-stop shopping for raging douchebaggery.
Posted by: Ace at
04:30 PM
| Comments (5)
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.
— Ace Yes, it was bad behavior. Yes, an athlete really ought never go into the stands and throwing punches.
But.
He was provoked. He had something thrown at him, right? Why aren't we focusing more on that part of the bad behavior?
Do I think Artest should be suspended? Absolutely. For life? No. He behaved badly, he lost control, he started punching out the NBA's customers, which isn't very good for business. He should be punished.
But I don't think I agree with this can-you-top-my-level-of-outrage contest.
He behaved badly. But people occasionally get into bar fights after a big provocation, and we generally don't strip away their livelihood. If you commit an assault on someone -- and throwing something at someone is an assault -- I'm sorry, but you're pretty much asking for it, and you can't complain much at what happens next.
I don't think the year's suspension without pay will stick; I think it will be negotiated down to something a lot less harsh. I hope it's not negotiated down to a slap on the wrist; he should be punished, as I've said.
But I think most men (and a few women!) would feel sorely provoked by having something thrown at them while they're just trying to do their job. And if you lash out -- well, you behaved unprofessionally and badly. But I can't say that you'd be behaving like an animal or a thug or otherwise inexplicably and unaccountably.
It's understandable behavior. Understandable does not mean "excusable" -- though many on the left seem to think it means just that -- but I think it does tend to mitigate the crime.
You throw something at this guy while I'm blogging, and you see what happens next.
Let's just say you'll be hearing the words "Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt!" in the ensuing combat rounds.
Okay, I Changed My Mind Update: Suspend this dick for life, just based on these quotes:
Meanwhile, Artest is promoting his record label, Truwarier, and said that with his other career endeavors he was trying to make his life more positive."Having a record company and putting out my own CD. There's clothes and shoes. There's also an upcoming book deal that I'm trying to do," he said.
"I'm trying to be positive. I'm a big fan of the Nobel Peace Prize."
Well... obviously.
Posted by: Ace at
01:20 PM
| Comments (31)
Post contains 406 words, total size 3 kb.
— Ace Sounds like someone's got a case of the crazies:
The 53-year-old, Iranian-born scholar has said CNN should be held accountable for "war crimes" for one-sided coverage of Sept. 11, 2001. He doubts the existence of Al Qaeda and questions the role of Osama Bin Laden in the attacks.
Hmmmm... You had me with that CNN war-crime stuff, and then you just lost me. I'm very particular about my crazytalk.
Via The Corner.
Link Fixed! My apologies for taking so long with that. It was a double quote that screwed everthing up.
Posted by: Ace at
01:08 PM
| Comments (4)
Post contains 123 words, total size 1 kb.
— Ace Hopefully they can get him and Peter Arnett together. Who knows what ribald shenanigans they'll come up with together.
Is Steven Glass available, I wonder?
Didja Ever Notice? Update: Andy Rooney's a bit of a douche, but every once in a while his douchebaggery is even-handed and actually directed at his fellow liberals. And that's just sweet:
"I am very critical of some of the people at CBS who make it apparent what their political leanings are," Rooney said. "That's what happened to this thing of Dan Rather's that got out. There's no question they wanted to run it because it was negative towards Bush."
In a further bout of candid heresies, Rooney suggested that perhaps the earth orbits the Sun, rather than vice versa.
CBSNews president Andy Heyword immediately called that claim "irresponsible speculation" by "politically partisan internet bloggers."
Posted by: Ace at
12:55 PM
| Comments (2)
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
— Ace Repeat after me: the exit poll data was published, and then never retracted nor caveated, by left-wing Wonkette and the amateur leftist Webzine Slate.
Right wing bloggers did note the numbers, of course. But the retractions and caveats came within an hour.
And note that the numbers weren't actually reported by many in the mainstream media, but those numbers were internalized and TV reporters pretty much gave away that Kerry was going to win fairly handily (or so they believed).
At least right-wing bloggers gave the reasons for their thinking, as well as the caveats to the numbers. Seems to me that it's better to err on the side of maximum information.
Why is the liberal media determined to pin the irresponsibility of their fellow liberals -- including even themselves -- on conservatives?
I guess that's a bit of a stumper. Sorry I asked such a difficult question.
Posted by: Ace at
11:58 AM
| Comments (1)
Post contains 174 words, total size 1 kb.
— Ace There are other theories, of course, but this one's the stand-out:
It all strikes me a very suspicious tooÂ….A little too weird to be a coincidence.
I would bet that if anyone planned it, it was DaddyÂ’s little boy himself. Pop gave a very nice speech at ClintonÂ’s library opening, Bet it infuriated *, and this would have been a nice way to get even. If I ever saw a classic case of Oedipal envy, this is it.
Pretty good theory there, I have to admit. Clinton gave such a rousing speech at that library opening that really, the only way to get the attention back on George Bush was to murder his father (and some bystanders). While I was listening to Clinton deliver his amazing oratory about whatever the hell it was he was talking about, all I could think was We really need to kill somebody big to drive this off the front pages.
Personally, I thought that knocking off Gerald "Major Dad"MacRaney would be enough. But I like the granduer of this guy's thinking.
Via Michele Malkin.
Posted by: Ace at
11:14 AM
| Comments (13)
Post contains 201 words, total size 1 kb.
— Ace Wishful thinking, stirring the pot, or does he actually know something?:
TOKYO, Nov. 21 - After weeks of reports from North Korea of defecting generals, antigovernment posters and the disappearance of portraits of the country's ruler, the leader of Japan's governing party warned Sunday of the prospects of "regime change" in North Korea."As long as Chairman Kim Jong Il controls the government, we have to negotiate with him, but it is becoming more doubtful whether we will be able to achieve anything with this government," said Shinzo Abe, acting secretary general of the Liberal Democratic Party, on Fuji TV, referring to talks on North Korea's abductions of Japanese in the 1970's. "I think we should consider the possibility that a regime change will occur, and we need to start simulations of what we should do at that time."
By breaking an unspoken taboo on talking publicly about "regime change" in North Korea, the powerful Japanese politician underlined a feeling spreading in the region that cracks are starting to show in the Kim family's control over North Korea after nearly 60 years.
...
There are indications that news is leaking out of North Korea by cellphone and that criticisms of the government are being posted in public places. Those developments and the angry response to recent legislation in the United States intended to flood the country with radios that can pick up foreign broadcasts suggest that the leadership realizes its one great achievement - near total information control - is threatened.
With the reports of Mr. Kim's portraits being removed from some public buildings and news of military defections, outside analysts are speculating that the personality cult around "Dear Leader" is being curbed, either to advance painful economic reforms or to head off a military coup fomented by China.
Persistent reports that anti-Kim leaflets and posters have recently appeared gained more credibility with the publication last Thursday in Sankei Shimbun, a conservative Tokyo newspaper, of what was described as a photograph of a hand-printed flyer smuggled out of North Korea.
A Quiet Understanding?: What's the internet for if not premature speculation? Such Little Things think that there's a coup on, instigated by China, at the US's behest.
Posted by: Ace at
11:01 AM
| Comments (2)
Post contains 398 words, total size 3 kb.
44 queries taking 0.3822 seconds, 151 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.







