April 16, 2014
— Ace The census is changing the way they ask a question about being insured. The old way, they say, tended to overstate how many people were uninsured. (But note Obama was willing to rely on that overstated figure in making his case for the urgency of destroying the health care system.)
The new way is supposedly "more accurate" -- but will result in fewer people saying they're uninsured.
Coincidentally I'm so f***ing sure, these changes are implemented at the precise damn moment Obama wants to demonstrate a Big Impact of Obamacare.
Of course, he has cooked the books. Much of the change in the number of uninsured will come simply from the new way in which the question is asked, but he will imply or explicitly state (explicit lies are well within his wheelhouse) that the drop in uninsured is attributable to Obamacare.
Megan McArdle, to whom, as a economist/analyst, data are precious as diamonds, is shocked that Obama would decided to destroy any possibility of using census data to get an accurate analysis of the impact of Obamacare, but perhaps she shouldn't be all that shocked at all.
Indeed, she suspects as much:
But why, dear God, oh, why, would you change it in the one year in the entire history of the republic that it is most important for policy makers, researchers and voters to be able to compare the number of uninsured to those in prior years? The answers would seem to range from “total incompetence on the part of every level of this administration” to something worse.Yes, that’s right, I said “every level.” Because guess who was involved in this decision, besides the wonks at Census?
The White House is always looking for evidence to show the benefits of the health law, which is an issue in many of this yearÂ’s midterm elections. The Department of Health and Human Services and the White House Council of Economic Advisers requested several of the new questions, and the White House Office of Management and Budget approved the new questionnaire. But the decision to make fundamental changes in the survey was driven by technical experts at the Census Bureau, and members of Congress have not focused on it or suggested political motives....
I find it completely and totally impossible to believe that this problem didnÂ’t occur to anyone at Census, or in the White House. It would be like arguing that the George W. Bush administration might have inadvertently overlooked the possibility that when the U.S. invaded Iraq, there would be shooting. This is the biggest policy debate of the last 10 years, and these data are at the heart of that debate. It is implausible that everyone involved somehow failed to notice that they were making it much harder to know the effect of this law on the population it was supposed to serve. Especially because the administration seems to have had a ready excuse as soon as people reacted to the news.
Of course, the Administration's main salutatory innovations in economic and policy matters has been to change the method by which we measure the economy and impacts of specific policies.
We used to figure out a President's job creation number from, get this, subtracting jobs lost from jobs created, resulting in (whether positive or negative) net jobs created.
But Obama found that Old School Approach to not be accurate enough. He created a new category -- Jobs Saved.
And when "Jobs Saved" turned out to not be plentiful in and of themselves, he created a new category-- "Jobs Funded." He asked employers to note when even a single dollar of government stimulus money had gone to an an employee, whether or not that employee was ever in danger of being laid off. If a single dollar of money went to that employee, then the job was considered "funded" by the government.
But that still wasn't enough -- the Department of Energy created a new metric for measuring the economic impact of stimulus spending. People who politically supported boondoggle spending on, say, Solyndra, would be credited as having been "positively impacted" by the spending.
Sure, Solyndra cost the country money in exchange for no jobs, but think about all those people "positively impacted" by the spending! They felt good about spending money on a cronyist boondoggle; and you just can't put a price on making progressives' erogenous zones throb with the excitement of spending other people's money.
Is GDP not growing enough? Is Obama being weighed down by low GDP growth figures?
Not to worry-- There's An App For That (TM).
Much attention about todayÂ’s data release will focus on BEAÂ’s new methodology for calculating GDP. This new methodology generally makes two large changes. First, it reclassifies some spending made by businesses as long-lived investment rather than current intermediate costs. This means that this reclassified spending now boosts measured GDP (which excludes intermediates costs, but does include investments).
Are too many businesses reporting that they're laying off workers at about the same time Obamacare is implemented? Don't sweat it -- just make businesses swear on their tax forms that firings were not due to Obamacare.
Consider what administration officials announcing the new exemption for medium-sized employers had to say about firms that might fire workers to get under the threshold and avoid hugely expensive new requirements of the law. Obama officials made clear in a press briefing that firms would not be allowed to lay off workers to get into the preferred class of those businesses with 50 to 99 employees. How will the feds know what employers were thinking when hiring and firing? Simple. Firms will be required to certify to the IRS – under penalty of perjury – that ObamaCare was not a motivating factor in their staffing decisions. To avoid ObamaCare costs you must swear that you are not trying to avoid ObamaCare costs. You can duck the law, but only if you promise not to say so.
Earlier in his term Obama wanted to reassure voters that he wasn't lenient on illegal immigration. And yet he was actually deporting fewer people than Bush or Clinton. How to assure them he was tough as nails on deportation, then?
Easy peasy -- change the way you calculate deportations. Just begin counting border interdictions (where you just stop someone at or near the border and send them back home) as "deportations" and suddenly you've doubled your "deportations."
Interdictions had never been before counted as "deportations." They were counted under a separate heading. So by changing the accounting method, "deportations" suddenly rise -- when in fact actual deportations have gone down. Way down.
And then, by simply changing your accounting method (without telling anyone about the change), you have gone from someone who's deporting fewer illegals to the Most Hardcore Hardass Deporter in History.
Of course, this then became a meme on the Open Borders left, with illegal immigrant advocates getting angry at Obama and calling him "The Deporter in Chief".... to which charge he now tells them, "Relax, I was just lying, fellas."
In Obama's first year in office, his administration deported 237,941 people. That number represents the traditional definition of a deportation: someone living their life in the U.S. when they encounter a law enforcement officer who has them shipped out of the country.By last year, that number had fallen to 133,551. And of those, 71,938 had been previously convicted of at least one felony or several misdemeanors – the "criminal aliens" that the administration has targeted. That means of the 12 million undocumented immigrants living in the country, fewer than 70,000 who have led generally peaceful lives here were deported last year.
Yes, the Obama administration says it deports 400,000 people annually, recently passing the 2 million mark throughout the president's time in office. But the majority of those cases involve people caught by Border Patrol agents along the Southwest border and processed through Immigration and Customs Enforcement. In years past, those people would have been quickly shipped back to Mexico....
The backlash started last September, when seven undocumented immigrants handcuffed themselves to the gates of the White House to call on the president to halt deportations. More groups joined in the chorus, culminating in a March speech by Janet MurguÃa, the president of the National Council of La Raza, the country's largest and most well-financed immigration advocacy group. In it, she called Obama "deporter in chief."
That led to a White House meeting last month, when the president voiced his frustration with leaders of several immigration advocacy groups. In his time in office, Obama has stopped the work site immigration raids so frequent under Bush and created a program that has granted protected status to more than 500,000 undocumented immigrants brought to the country as children. He has stopped the deportation of relatives of military members, is considering extending work visas to spouses of foreigners working in the country and ordered a system-wide review of deportation practices to see how to conduct them "more humanely."
When Obama speaks to the Gringos, he touts the 400,000 figure.
When he speaks to Hispanics -- at a White House meeting, presumably behind closed doors -- he tells them he's not really deporting that many people.
A different lie for every constituency.
And in each case, the changes in accounting methodology prevent the whole point of accounting -- accountability.
There is never a good baseline upon which to judge Obama's performance, because at every turn he deliberately destroys the baseline measure.
Orwell noted that whoever controls the past, controls the future.
Obama seems to be an Apt Pupil.
Primary Season: Remember when Obama claimed that he was submitting a budget that would be "balanced" in its out-years (you know, those years a convenient decade away when all the real cuts would allegedly occur)?
He was questioned on this -- how could he say the budget was "balanced" when his own charts still showed $800 billion per year deficits?
Ah, you see, you misunderstood -- they only meant the primary budget would be balanced, the primary budget defined as the budget excluding the huge outlays to maintain debt service on already-accrued borrowing.
This is like saying "Well, the budget is balanced. And when I say 'budget,' I mean the budget, excluding Social Security payments."
Why would you exclude those? What possible justification is there to treat some expenditures as somehow not worthy of being counted?
But even by Obama's new accounting on what "balanced" means -- of course it even turned out that that was a lie.
Posted by: Ace at
11:53 AM
| Comments (353)
Post contains 1809 words, total size 12 kb.
Posted by: Citizen X at April 16, 2014 11:56 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 11:57 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 11:59 AM (DL2i+)
Posted by: t-bird at April 16, 2014 11:59 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/s] [/u] at April 16, 2014 12:01 PM (HsTG8)
Posted by: TOP MEN IN THE GOP at April 16, 2014 12:01 PM (F6KtL)
Posted by: Virginia Socon at April 16, 2014 12:01 PM (+/C3g)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at April 16, 2014 12:01 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Kreplach at April 16, 2014 12:01 PM (5PkZK)
Posted by: Formerly known as Skeptic at April 16, 2014 12:02 PM (91XRk)
Posted by: Carol at April 16, 2014 12:02 PM (DVPta)
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 16, 2014 12:03 PM (fOLwM)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) [/b] [/i] [/s] at April 16, 2014 12:03 PM (HDwDg)
Posted by: Mama AJ at April 16, 2014 12:03 PM (SUKHu)
Posted by: ace at April 16, 2014 12:04 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Virginia Socon at April 16, 2014 12:04 PM (+/C3g)
Posted by: TOP MEN IN THE GOP at April 16, 2014 12:04 PM (F6KtL)
___
Hey is worked for me...for a while at least.
Posted by: Ken Lay at April 16, 2014 12:04 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Tsewj at April 16, 2014 12:05 PM (k9BTK)
Posted by: ejo at April 16, 2014 12:05 PM (GXvSO)
Of course Token can play a bass line.
Posted by: Eric Cartman[/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 12:05 PM (DL2i+)
Posted by: Mr. Feverhead at April 16, 2014 12:05 PM (6ahup)
***
Is there one cherry tree in Washington DC that is individually responsible for all the increase in economic activity since Obama was elected?
Posted by: 18-1 at April 16, 2014 12:05 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 12:06 PM (QupBk)
___
I tell ya, these fine La Raza folks throw a heck of a fiesta. Top shelf liquor for everyone!
Posted by: John Boehner at April 16, 2014 12:07 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 16, 2014 12:07 PM (IdOTf)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 16, 2014 12:07 PM (0LHZx)
I have changed the metric for whether I did do That Thing in your mouth.
You still have to swallow, though.
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at April 16, 2014 12:07 PM (JtwS4)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 12:08 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at April 16, 2014 12:08 PM (bX7ov)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 12:08 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 16, 2014 12:08 PM (TIIx5)
Posted by: zombie at April 16, 2014 12:08 PM (mizYg)
___
Do you have what it takes to be a hard nosed SWAT Officer? Apply at Department of Education.gov and find out! Remember only you can stop home schooling.
Posted by: Job Opportunity you'll see on Linkedin soon... at April 16, 2014 12:08 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 16, 2014 12:09 PM (yFbI+)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 12:09 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: FCF at April 16, 2014 12:09 PM (Khja4)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 16, 2014 12:09 PM (0LHZx)
___
Hey, I'm paying exactly as much for waygu and arugula in 2014 as I did in 2009. Bupkiss!
Posted by: Barack Obama at April 16, 2014 12:09 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Low Information Voter at April 16, 2014 12:09 PM (pmsMR)
Posted by: Carol at April 16, 2014 12:09 PM (4rxW7)
Posted by: Buzzion at April 16, 2014 12:10 PM (k9BTK)
Ok I posted this earlier and then work got in the way . I recieved two big envelopes in the maiil from the Census Bureau. Something about my house has been picked for the American Community Survey. Wants to know who lives in my house (not names) and there are 48 detailed questions about each person. Crazy. I didnt do it and then got a call from them saying I need to do it or they will send a agent to call on our house.It's required by law. Some bs about how it help the gov serve our community better. She gave me the website and a id number so i can sign in a do it online. Has this happened to anybody else?
Posted by: Big Swingin Al at April 16, 2014 12:10 PM (iWo0u)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 16, 2014 12:10 PM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Seems legit at April 16, 2014 12:10 PM (jEV5Y)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 12:10 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: zombie at April 16, 2014 12:10 PM (mizYg)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 16, 2014 12:11 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 16, 2014 12:11 PM (yFbI+)
Posted by: t-bird at April 16, 2014 12:11 PM (FcR7P)
___
Damn straight...we'll tell them to take the centigrade out of the whitehouse thermometers and we won't sit down until they give in!
Posted by: Boehner feeling a little tipsy at April 16, 2014 12:11 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 16, 2014 12:11 PM (IdOTf)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 12:11 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Roy at April 16, 2014 12:11 PM (VndSC)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 12:12 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: FCF at April 16, 2014 12:12 PM (Khja4)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 16, 2014 12:12 PM (yFbI+)
Obama is a Chicago politician, from the same mold as every other machine politician ever was from the Gilded Age to now.
That is the only explanation you need for his actions.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Snow! AHHHHHHHH! at April 16, 2014 12:12 PM (hLRSq)
But Obama tells the prettiest lies! And, he really sticks it to those nasty racist, homophobic, sexist, evil, rich Rethuglikkkans.
Yup, he's our guy.....
Posted by: LIV at April 16, 2014 12:13 PM (DErq5)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(thanks to private lands that he has no control over)
Posted by: more fun with numbers at April 16, 2014 12:13 PM (08jH8)
***
Actually, it would appear that the same cohort is currently employing both teams' coaches and quarterback.
Team Obama and Team Romney would appear to be varsity and junior varsity technocrat U
Posted by: 18-1 at April 16, 2014 12:13 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Seems legit at April 16, 2014 12:14 PM (jEV5Y)
20 -
I would think asking the same person both question would bias the results, one way or the other, but I'm mystified as to how this question could get asked differently. Isn't the question, do you have health insurance? How many other ways can that be asked?
Posted by: BurtTC at April 16, 2014 12:14 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Citizen X at April 16, 2014 12:14 PM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Kevin in ABQ at April 16, 2014 12:15 PM (XrGnJ)
Posted by: more fun with numbers at April 16, 2014 12:15 PM (08jH8)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 12:16 PM (bb5+k)
***
Obama shows up at the good kids' houses and gives them chocolate coins and jellybeans?
Posted by: 18-1 at April 16, 2014 12:16 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 12:16 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 12:16 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Kreplach at April 16, 2014 12:16 PM (gznAu)
Posted by: zombie at April 16, 2014 12:17 PM (mizYg)
Posted by: Stark Dickflüssig at April 16, 2014 12:17 PM (MbqmP)
Posted by: Barky O'bumbles at April 16, 2014 12:17 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at April 16, 2014 12:17 PM (bX7ov)
MemeStateWaitForIt,
Yes
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 12:18 PM (DL2i+)
If you use a fake name the odds you get caught for vote fraud are basically 0%.
___
I have no idea what you are talking about sir. Such a thing is unpossible.
Posted by: Doodad Pro at April 16, 2014 12:18 PM (78TbK)
58 -
Those are supposed to be two different things. The every ten year census vs. the surveys they do ever few years or so.
Only one has the power of law behind it, I believe. I don't see how they can MAKE you complete the ACS.
Posted by: BurtTC at April 16, 2014 12:18 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 16, 2014 12:18 PM (yFbI+)
"I mean, I can certainly think of explanations, but I canÂ’t quite bring myself to believe the worst of them."
There you have it, ladies and gentlemen. Someone presented with the unambiguous plain proofs of massive dishonesty and corruption in this administration, and instead frantically grabbing about for any fragment of straw that might instead prove the lesser charge of incompetence.
Posted by: torquewrench at April 16, 2014 12:18 PM (noWW6)
Also, they've changed the metrics on the survey, but it was still survey data to begin with. Like the fake unemployment number, or any poll, it's an estimate based on statistical sampling which can be skewed any number of ways.
The payroll report is based on how many people actually get paid. I'm sure someone somewhere could add up the number of people actually insured by asking the finite number of actual insurers how many people they cover.
And it's probably mathematically possible to count the actual number of OCare enrollees, and even to subtract from that number the number of people who haven't paid. I mean, we're really good at counting how many have started to fill out a form on a web site.
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at April 16, 2014 12:19 PM (JtwS4)
___
Its a tax.
Posted by: John ROberts at April 16, 2014 12:19 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: jeannebodine at April 16, 2014 12:19 PM (2LJqa)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 12:20 PM (bb5+k)
___
If only someone would let the Fuhrer/Stalin/etc know about this outrage!
Posted by: Some LIV from a previous generation at April 16, 2014 12:20 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 12:21 PM (ZPrif)
Last I looked, it was "How's my ass taste?"
The response from the Beltway establishment Republicans, on their knees and gobbling away, is a muffled "Sublimely delicious, sir."
Posted by: torquewrench at April 16, 2014 12:21 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: Carol at April 16, 2014 12:21 PM (PVNda)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 16, 2014 12:21 PM (yFbI+)
Posted by: Max Power at April 16, 2014 12:21 PM (q177U)
Posted by: backhoe at April 16, 2014 12:21 PM (ULH4o)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at April 16, 2014 12:22 PM (bX7ov)
Posted by: Michelle Obama at April 16, 2014 12:22 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 12:22 PM (xorT2)
Posted by: ejo at April 16, 2014 12:22 PM (GXvSO)
"I mean, I can certainly think of explanations, but I canÂ’t quite bring myself to believe the worst of them."
He's a Chicago politician so of course he's corrupt; you'll sooner find a virgin in a brothel than an uncorruptible Chicago politician. What is so difficult about that concept for people to believe?
All Chicago politicians are corrupt.
Obama is a Chicago politician.
Therefore Obama is corrupt.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Snow! AHHHHHHHH! at April 16, 2014 12:22 PM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 12:23 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at April 16, 2014 12:23 PM (/djtm)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: ManCity 1 Sunderland 1 at April 16, 2014 12:23 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 16, 2014 12:23 PM (IdOTf)
Oh, I say and I say it again, ya been had!
Ya'll been took!
Ya'll been hoodwinked!
Bamboozled!
Led astray!
Run amok!
This is what He does....
Posted by: Megan X at April 16, 2014 12:23 PM (DErq5)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 12:24 PM (ZPrif)
And you know who invented all this government measuring of everything? The commies. Cause you can't control the population unless you know exactly what they're up to.
You can't steal just enough of their grain to keep them barely alive without knowing how much grain is grown.
If the government wasn't measuring everything, they wouldn't know what needed to be fucked with/up. Every Crisis needs a statistic.
Global warming hockey sticks
Millions uninsured
77 cents on the dollar
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at April 16, 2014 12:24 PM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 16, 2014 12:24 PM (HLprW)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at April 16, 2014 12:24 PM (rXUKI)
Posted by: zombie at April 16, 2014 12:24 PM (mizYg)
They just never let up. I mean, don't these people ever get tired? Are they not in the least bit self-aware? At every level of the federal government, you've got people cooking numbers and formulating spin and persecuting political enemies, a bee-like hive of frantic activity like one of those corporate factory films from the Fifties.
I kind of rolled my eyes a little when people pointed out the framed Soviet-era posters on the walls of Jay Carney's house in that fawning magazine article. Now I'm think maybe Carney wasn't being ironic.
Posted by: troyriser at April 16, 2014 12:24 PM (2jF2B)
If a CEO could not figure out she had just signed a contract with a grifter for 6 years, and even at the end of that run was arguing that the grifter was just making some bad choices what would the company do with her?
And yet we have a whole slate of McArdles...
Posted by: 18-1 at April 16, 2014 12:24 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Carol at April 16, 2014 12:25 PM (J7sV0)
Posted by: Max Power at April 16, 2014 04:21 PM (q177U)
Just lie about how much you weigh.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at April 16, 2014 12:25 PM (AC0lD)
Posted by: Bill O'Reilly at April 16, 2014 12:25 PM (nCSwS)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 12:25 PM (xorT2)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: ManCity 1 Sunderland 1 at April 16, 2014 12:26 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: MTF at April 16, 2014 12:26 PM (LISuA)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: ManCity 1 Sunderland 1 at April 16, 2014 12:26 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at April 16, 2014 12:26 PM (bX7ov)
We were all bitching about this on the ONT.
And yep, the feds will absolutely bulldog you with endless harassment until you either comply, or make it clear that you will not comply short of a judge's order. They will in fact come personally to your door and threaten you with punishment unless you submit.
One of the Horde was marveling at the incredible arrogant intrusiveness of the questionnaire (tailor-made for identity thieves, by the way) and saying that they couldn't believe that the rest of us hadn't made the thing up as a spoof.
I have to demur from that. A census community survey produced by the AoSHQ 'ettes and 'rons would have obvious giveaway questions in it.
-- Hobo scalps. How many are hanging from your living room wall?
-- Estimate your Val-U-Rite consumption in quarts per week.
-- Kate Upton. Trampoline, zero gee, or motorboat? Select only one.
-- Honey badgers versus ice weasels. Who will have ultimate victory?
Posted by: torquewrench at April 16, 2014 12:27 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: The Humpty at April 16, 2014 12:27 PM (hppbQ)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 16, 2014 12:27 PM (XUKZU)
Posted by: McCool at April 16, 2014 12:27 PM (nCSwS)
***
If you described the current political goals of the establishment to the average American of say 1964 they would have called them flat out evil and asked what third world country you were talking about...
Yet somehow even questioning the current political paradigms of the ruling class is politically incorrect and neither of the political parties (as a whole organization) is willing to do so.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 16, 2014 12:27 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 16, 2014 12:28 PM (yFbI+)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 12:28 PM (ZPrif)
Oh, ignore that sound coming from my basement. Those aren't the cries of a young boy.
Posted by: Harry Reid at April 16, 2014 12:28 PM (F6KtL)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 16, 2014 12:28 PM (yFbI+)
Posted by: zombie at April 16, 2014 12:29 PM (mizYg)
139 -
There's no independent evidence of his intelligence. He listens to Valery Jarret, and she's taking her cues directly from the Alinsky playbook.
There's a way to fight them, but it doesn't need to be outsmarting them. I needs to be standing up to them at every turn, and right now nobody does that. Nobody.
Posted by: BurtTC at April 16, 2014 12:29 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 16, 2014 12:29 PM (o3MSL)
Posted by: Carol at April 16, 2014 12:29 PM (IyKYr)
Good luck and let the rest of the Horde know what you find.
Posted by: SnowyBits at April 16, 2014 12:29 PM (NqhG2)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 12:29 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: ManCity 1 Sunderland 1 at April 16, 2014 12:29 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Mob Accountant at April 16, 2014 12:30 PM (F6KtL)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 12:30 PM (xorT2)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 16, 2014 12:30 PM (XUKZU)
Posted by: A Guy Who's Really Good At Detecting Patterns at April 16, 2014 12:30 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 16, 2014 12:31 PM (o3MSL)
___
He really is a great actor. I loved him in Ender's Game
Posted by: Your Average LIV at April 16, 2014 12:31 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: Carol at April 16, 2014 12:31 PM (IyKYr)
Posted by: RWC at April 16, 2014 12:31 PM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 16, 2014 12:33 PM (HLprW)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 16, 2014 12:33 PM (32Ze2)
You betcha....
Posted by: backhoe at April 16, 2014 12:33 PM (ULH4o)
Posted by: spongeworthy at April 16, 2014 12:33 PM (8Pg2o)
Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at April 16, 2014 12:34 PM (hn5v5)
Posted by: Soothsayer, Lesbian Outreach Coordinator at April 16, 2014 12:34 PM (yFbI+)
Posted by: Your Friends at the U.S. Census Bureau at April 16, 2014 12:34 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: ManCity 2 Sunderland 2 at April 16, 2014 12:35 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at April 16, 2014 12:35 PM (/djtm)
Posted by: torquewrench at April 16, 2014 12:36 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: taylork at April 16, 2014 12:37 PM (9bPUR)
I can only hope someone is keeping track of all of this, so that every one involved can be hung down the road.
Do you really think they'll be time or consensus after the Managed Decline enters the terminal phase.
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 12:37 PM (DL2i+)
___
Hey, I'm in favor of being free to tell you how you will live your life.
What could be more libertarian then that?
Posted by: Bill Maher at April 16, 2014 12:37 PM (78TbK)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at April 16, 2014 12:37 PM (rXUKI)
Posted by: Your Friends at the Department of Justice at April 16, 2014 12:38 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at April 16, 2014 12:38 PM (/djtm)
Posted by: Chavez the Hugo at April 16, 2014 12:38 PM (Q8vlx)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 16, 2014 12:38 PM (HLprW)
You know, so it looks like I have fewer?
Posted by: Washington Nearsider, who does NOT speak for the Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General at April 16, 2014 12:38 PM (fwARV)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at April 16, 2014 12:39 PM (dfYL9)
Posted by: BurtTC at April 16, 2014 04:29 PM (TOk1P)
What you're talking about takes leadership and bravery since the first ones to do what you're talking about are going to be personally and professionally ruined, if not imprisoned. So after you, Burt, and watch that first step.
Posted by: troyriser at April 16, 2014 12:39 PM (2jF2B)
White House Live @WHLive 6m
Obama: "WeÂ’re working with a bipartisan coalition of governors and mayors...to make job training partnerships a reality for more Americans."
Posted by: RWC at April 16, 2014 04:31 PM (fWAjv)
So theirs a shortage of places to learn a vocation or is it a matter of signing up, showing up aka a desire.
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at April 16, 2014 12:39 PM (mETGQ)
Is brain lock an excusable medical issue, or drooling induced dehydration?
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 12:39 PM (DL2i+)
So young, yet so cynical.
It's almost as if you grew up in the cradle of progressivism, where the ends justify the means.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2014 12:39 PM (QFxY5)
Posted by: Hrothgar GOPe Spokeperson at April 16, 2014 12:39 PM (o3MSL)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 56% more DOOM! at April 16, 2014 12:40 PM (FA3Z7)
Posted by: mrp at April 16, 2014 12:40 PM (JBggj)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 12:40 PM (xorT2)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 12:41 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: MTF at April 16, 2014 12:42 PM (LISuA)
The other thing it would be nice to do "down the road" is return the computation of GDP to its original rules, before the Obama crew cynically gimmicked it last year to artifically add two-plus points.
And then retroactively recompute GDP for the 2013-2016 time frame to give the accurate, ungimmicked picture of the actual Obama economic record.
Posted by: torquewrench at April 16, 2014 12:42 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 12:42 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: toby928© blurts at April 16, 2014 12:42 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Eyes on the Prize at April 16, 2014 12:43 PM (wu/TK)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 12:43 PM (xorT2)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 16, 2014 12:43 PM (o3MSL)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 12:43 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 16, 2014 12:43 PM (HLprW)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 16, 2014 12:44 PM (APuJ7)
Posted by: steevy at April 16, 2014 12:44 PM (zqvg6)
For a change of outrage, Insty has a link to a Wired piece. The substance is accurately contained in the headline:
"Obama: NSA Must Reveal Bugs Like Heartbleed, Unless They Help the NSA".
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at April 16, 2014 12:44 PM (JtwS4)
Posted by: newman at April 16, 2014 12:44 PM (hn5v5)
Anything but the following is unnecessary.
1. Were you uninsured over six months in the past five years?
2. Are you insured now?
Posted by: Sally at April 16, 2014 12:45 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2014 12:46 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: The All-New Census at April 16, 2014 12:46 PM (FcR7P)
torquewrench ?
Thanks- I had a really bad flare up of RA over a month ago when I had to get out in cold and rain to get my tax papers to my CPA- still walking with a staff. OTOH he determined I was so poor I didn't even have to file a return. Then an old sinus infection came back- and the jackass doc who treated the last one would not renew the antibiotic scrip over the phone. He wanted to see me but I could not make the walk- tarnation....
Posted by: backhoe at April 16, 2014 12:46 PM (ULH4o)
___
See I took a $250B deficit, raised it to $1.5T, and then "cut" it to $600B!
I am the deficit slayer!
Posted by: Barack Obama at April 16, 2014 12:46 PM (78TbK)
That one, too, Steevy. It's so obviously false that I don't bother trying to "prove" it on the Net; I just call it a lie. I think it's some convoluted bullshit involving what the dollar is worth now as compared with then.
Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at April 16, 2014 12:47 PM (hn5v5)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 12:47 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 16, 2014 12:47 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 16, 2014 12:48 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: eleven at April 16, 2014 12:48 PM (GXZgZ)
Jackie Robinson Day has morphed into perpetual grievance day.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2014 12:48 PM (QFxY5)
Posted by: steevy at April 16, 2014 12:49 PM (zqvg6)
Posted by: ejo at April 16, 2014 12:49 PM (GXvSO)
Posted by: Chavez the Hugo at April 16, 2014 12:49 PM (Q8vlx)
Posted by: AJ Lynch at April 16, 2014 12:49 PM (ASPsd)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 16, 2014 12:50 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 16, 2014 12:50 PM (HLprW)
Posted by: ejo at April 16, 2014 12:50 PM (GXvSO)
New York/New Jersey Moron Meet-up
Thursday, May 1st
6pm-9pm
West Village
All Morons and their handlers are welcome.
for additional info, email me at:
nynjmeet at optimum dot net
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 16, 2014 12:51 PM (QFxY5)
This is what they'll build over Bundy's Ranch, except the lack of water will slow the weed growth.
Posted by: Bill sometimes bill from Canada at April 16, 2014 12:51 PM (CbU3W)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 16, 2014 12:51 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: eleven at April 16, 2014 12:51 PM (GXZgZ)
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 16, 2014 12:51 PM (DTVYh)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 12:52 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 16, 2014 12:52 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 16, 2014 12:53 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 12:53 PM (xorT2)
Posted by: Hello it's me Donna and I know nuthink! at April 16, 2014 12:53 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 12:53 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 16, 2014 12:54 PM (APuJ7)
Republicans cut entitlements mean they agreed to reduce increases from 6% to 3%.
Obama cuts deficit means he has reduced the record deficit he created to just not as big a record deficit.
Posted by: polynikes at April 16, 2014 12:54 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 16, 2014 12:54 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 16, 2014 12:54 PM (8MjqI)
Posted by: Cowboy Bill Watts at April 16, 2014 12:54 PM (APuJ7)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 16, 2014 12:54 PM (32Ze2)
Posted by: thunderb at April 16, 2014 12:55 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 16, 2014 12:55 PM (HLprW)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 12:56 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Progtard 2000 at April 16, 2014 12:56 PM (ZPrif)
Rickie Weeks and Carlos Gomze both struck out with the bases loaded. There's MY grievance.
Posted by: HR at April 16, 2014 12:56 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: SFGoth at April 16, 2014 12:56 PM (m/OTB)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at April 16, 2014 12:57 PM (dfYL9)
193 -
This is why I still don't think we can be certain Breitbart died of natural causes.
It's in their playbook too.
Posted by: BurtTC at April 16, 2014 12:57 PM (TOk1P)
I seem to have missed The Jamiel Shaw Story. C'mon, Denzel.
http://is.gd/AeKkGs
Posted by: HR at April 16, 2014 12:59 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 12:59 PM (xorT2)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 01:00 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 16, 2014 01:00 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: jwest at April 16, 2014 01:02 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Elmer Stoup at April 16, 2014 01:02 PM (ePknf)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at April 16, 2014 01:03 PM (dfYL9)
Posted by: Donna Dixon at April 16, 2014 01:03 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: thunderb at April 16, 2014 01:03 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Peaches at April 16, 2014 01:03 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: Skookumchuk at April 16, 2014 01:05 PM (OSzB9)
Posted by: shibumi who is exceptionally cynical today at April 16, 2014 01:05 PM (25HWz)
Posted by: Separate but Stupid at April 16, 2014 01:06 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 01:06 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 16, 2014 01:06 PM (HLprW)
Forget the liquor cabinet, I want the key to the flamethrower.
Posted by: HR at April 16, 2014 01:07 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 01:07 PM (xorT2)
275 -
It's funny how he shows up and pollutes the bottoms of threads.
Like the scum that settles in the sewers after a heavy rain.
Posted by: BurtTC at April 16, 2014 01:07 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: troyriser at April 16, 2014 04:39 PM (2jF2B)
I've been fortunate to be living in Texas and not have had any direct injustice forced upon me by the government. Yet. I would like to think that I would not just take it because I am only thinking of my personal safety. It definitely would be against my nature if history is any indication. You never know though.
Posted by: polynikes at April 16, 2014 01:08 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: thunderb at April 16, 2014 01:08 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 16, 2014 01:09 PM (HLprW)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 01:09 PM (xorT2)
I wouldn't be too quick to trust those figures, either.
The administration and CBO were claiming the 2013 deficit was going to be down to "only" the $600B range. (Which illustrates how insane things are, when you think about it, that six hundred billion is the low end of the range.)
The GAO said, hey, not so fast, we added up the actual fiscal year revenue versus the actual fiscal year outlays, and the 2013 deficit was still in the trillion dollar range.
Of course, the press, instead of pointing out that crucial economic data are being gamed to where those data are no longer reliable for decision making, had more important things to cover. Kardashians!
Posted by: torquewrench at April 16, 2014 01:10 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 01:10 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 16, 2014 01:11 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: Separate but Stupid at April 16, 2014 01:11 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: steevy at April 16, 2014 01:11 PM (zqvg6)
Posted by: jwest at April 16, 2014 01:11 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 01:12 PM (bb5+k)
We're oiling _something_ up, if you know what we mean and we think you do.
Posted by: The GOP Establishment at April 16, 2014 01:12 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: Hello it's me Donna and I know nuthink! at April 16, 2014 01:12 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 16, 2014 01:13 PM (yz6yg)
296 -
"Fox News to Launch ‘Outnumbered,’ a Noontime Panel Show, April 28
Four rotating women and a guy."
That's all we need, more dizzy broads on tv.
Posted by: BurtTC at April 16, 2014 01:13 PM (TOk1P)
You don't hear that much any more.
Posted by: Sphynx at April 16, 2014 01:13 PM (OZmbA)
Posted by: toby928© blurts at April 16, 2014 01:13 PM (QupBk)
IIRC, he was also a blabbermouth, who managed to infuriate Churchill, because he decided to conduct his own diplomacy to try and stop the use of the bomb. Apparently, Churchill was right, and Szilard was subtly shuttled away from the Manhattan Project.
Posted by: pep at April 16, 2014 01:13 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: Washington Nearsider, who does NOT speak for the Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General at April 16, 2014 01:13 PM (fwARV)
D-Lamp?
I honestly don't know what I see coming. All I can do is keep my head down and look out for the few people who cared about me after Miss Emily's death.
Posted by: backhoe at April 16, 2014 01:13 PM (ULH4o)
Posted by: thunderb at April 16, 2014 01:14 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 16, 2014 01:17 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: Joost at April 16, 2014 01:17 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: jwest at April 16, 2014 05:11 PM (u2a4R)
No , in this scenario you would need an example. Specific charges need specific examples. Even the lefty news media knows not to present a specific narrative unless its occurred at least once. I concede that one crackpot they associate with the right is not so difficult to find. Hasn't happened yet.
Posted by: polynikes at April 16, 2014 01:17 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 01:17 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 16, 2014 01:17 PM (APuJ7)
Posted by: jwest brain cells at April 16, 2014 01:18 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Washington Nearsider, who does NOT speak for the Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General at April 16, 2014 01:19 PM (fwARV)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 16, 2014 01:19 PM (yz6yg)
>>"I Â’m speechless. Shocked. Stunned. Horrified. Befuddled. Aghast, appalled, thunderstruck, perplexed, baffled, bewildered and dumbfounded."
That's the fuc*ing problem. They're always "shocked." It seems like some kind of phenomenal cognitive impairment shared by the commentariat. How many times are they going to "shocked" by Obama? What does it take to figure this guy out? How can smart people be this stupid?
Posted by: rrpjr at April 16, 2014 01:19 PM (s/yC1)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at April 16, 2014 01:20 PM (9Bdcz)
Posted by: The Harvard Faculty [/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 16, 2014 01:20 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: jwest at April 16, 2014 01:21 PM (u2a4R)
(Only joking, Toby.
Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at April 16, 2014 01:21 PM (hn5v5)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 16, 2014 01:22 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at April 16, 2014 01:24 PM (dfYL9)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 16, 2014 01:24 PM (8MjqI)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 01:25 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: jwest at April 16, 2014 01:25 PM (zOTsN)
“There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.”
Posted by: George Orwell at April 16, 2014 01:25 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: Aviator at April 16, 2014 01:26 PM (3rrMW)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 16, 2014 01:27 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 05:25 PM (bb5+k)
RINO. I'd have gone for listening to the collected speeches of Barack Obama.
Posted by: pep at April 16, 2014 01:28 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 01:29 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at April 16, 2014 01:32 PM (VIo0S)
Posted by: thunderb at April 16, 2014 01:32 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: deadrody at April 16, 2014 01:33 PM (+Dpo7)
He (Obama) has stopped the deportation of relatives of military members..."
You don't need times, places, names or pictures. The media is reporting this as the fact and that's all LIVs need.
Posted by: jwest at April 16, 2014 05:21 PM (u2a4R
How does that translate to Republicans were demanding deportation?
Posted by: polynikes at April 16, 2014 01:44 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: polynikes at April 16, 2014 05:44 PM (m2CN7)
Which you accused them of doing.
Posted by: polynikes at April 16, 2014 01:46 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Seattle Lurker at April 16, 2014 01:49 PM (gUy/B)
Posted by: jwest at April 16, 2014 01:51 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: RokShox at April 16, 2014 01:52 PM (8MMMw)
Posted by: jwest at April 16, 2014 05:51 PM (u2a4R)
No you accused Republicans of doing it you dumb intellecutally dishonest fuck wad. Take your time trying to spin out of that.
Posted by: polynikes at April 16, 2014 02:00 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 16, 2014 02:06 PM (/vO0r)
"One out of 6 Americans struggles with hunger."
What absolute, complete, and total BULLSHIT. That lie is on the same order as the 50,000 kidnapped kids lie that had missing kids faces on Milk Cartons.
Simply from the Bell shaped curve - if one out of 6 Americans were struggling with hunger there would be millions of Biafra style starvation victims lying in the streets of cities all over this country. Go to the poorest sections of the USA, do you see anyone starving?
Posted by: [/i] [/s] [/u] [/b] An Observation at April 16, 2014 02:07 PM (ylhEn)
The reason for Cantor’s displeasure: Obama released a statement earlier Wednesday blaming Republicans for “seemingly preferring the status quo of a broken immigration system over meaningful reform.”
“The President called me hours after he issued a partisan statement which attacked me and my fellow House Republicans and which indicated no sincere desire to work together,” Cantor said.
Posted by: Kahless the Unforgettable at April 16, 2014 02:16 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: bleck at April 16, 2014 02:28 PM (ruoPh)
Posted by: Jean at April 16, 2014 03:30 PM (Aqvh6)
Posted by: Jean at April 16, 2014 03:33 PM (Aqvh6)
That should read "Megan McArdle, to whom, as an Obama supporter". Need to be accurate here.
Posted by: physics geek at April 16, 2014 04:43 PM (a83iT)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at April 16, 2014 07:37 PM (XO6WW)
Posted by: Barney F. at April 17, 2014 03:14 AM (zGaZT)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3075 seconds, 481 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: D-Lamp at April 16, 2014 11:55 AM (bb5+k)