April 17, 2008

Hamas Endorses Obama
— Ace

Plus, a rundown of who other terrorist figures are supporting.

Posted by: Ace at 06:29 AM | Comments (5)
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.

Cheney at DC Correspondents' Dinner
— Ace

Funniest line: "Hillary's Bosnia gaffe was just her misremembering a hunting trip with me."

Posted by: Ace at 05:55 AM | Comments (8)
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.

Lamb of Chicago Lying His Ass Off (Again.) [jdub]
— Open Blog

Charlie Gibson asked Barack Obama about the capital gains tax:

GIBSON: And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from
the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s,
when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.
So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million
people in this country own stock and would be affected?
OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I've said is that I would look at
raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness.

O RLY?
more...

Posted by: Open Blog at 05:49 AM | Comments (13)
Post contains 559 words, total size 4 kb.

Childish, Spolied-Rotten Left Reacts to Debate in Childish, Spoiled-Rotten Fashion
— Ace

This is the most unhinged reaction I've seen, but the day is young.

The post looks rewritten. Last night when I read it, the poster accused Gibson and Stephanopolous of a "conspiracy to Subvert Democracy" by daring to ask a presidential candidate why he pals around with terrorists.

That line isn't quite there anymore, but the gist of it is still there:

Below is the history of how we saw the Okie-Dokie coming a mile away and how a network Subverted Democracy. President Barack should pull their Broadcasting License.

Cuffy Meigs puts the live-blogging of Jim Geraghty and Andrew Sulivan side-by-side. Geraghty thinks the questions were good and fair, Sullivan is having conniptions. But let me address his whine:

Because she's shameless, she's doing better. The appropriation of small-town life as part of her autobiography was a particularly brilliant.
...


On Wright, again her shamelessness helps her. His affect is total exhaustion, alas, as if being pummeled with every Rovian tactic has beaten the life out of him. And he is being pummeled by the ABC hosts as well. One reason I like the guy is that he is still human; politics hasn't killed his soul.

...

So far, neither Gibson nor Stephanopoulos have asked a single policy-related question. They seem utterly uninterested in foreign or domestic policy. After the past eight years, we have had half an hour with nothing but process questions. Gibson and Stephanopoulos are clearly part of the problem in this election and part of what has to be reformed.

...

I'm just pointing out that we are now almost halfway through this debate and ABC News has not asked a single policy question. It's pure Rove, sustained and hyped and sustained by Stephanopoulos and Gibson. It's what they know; it's easy; and it will generate ratings. It is not journalism....I have to say I am actually shocked at the appallingly poor quality of the questions: the worst of the campaign so far. Pure MSM process bullshit. Again: it's now halfway through and there has not been a single question on the economy, foreign policy, healthcare, terrorism, Iraq or any other actual policy issue in this campaign. How much longer can ABC News avoid the actual policy issues in this election?

The whole why-don't-we-talk-about-the-issues whine is childish. Obama and Hillary have extraordinarily similar declared programs by this point. The only real surviving differences between them are what parts of their declared programs do they really intend to follow through on, and which unstated agendas will they also pursue.

Simply allowing them to blather for an hour each about nearly-indistinguishable programmatic posturings does not advance the debate whatsoever. If you want to know what crap they're claiming they'll push as President, check their websites.

What distinguishes them among Democrats are issues of character (Hillary's lying, Obama's discomforting comfort with radicals and terrorists) and the widespread belief on the left that Hillary is a "neocon" moderate who lies about her liberal leanings, whereas Obama is the general article and really believes in old school big-L Liberalism, and is in fact lying about his moderation to preserve his electability. Only by asking about issues of character and background and a candidate's real, unexpressed political thinking can possibly shed light as to whether those readings on the candidate are true or not.

In Sullivan's case, he has an exceptional lack of self-awareness, as usual. He despises Hillary, and, per Christopher Hitchens, wants to have Obama's baby almost entirely on the basis of character and authenticity. Over and over again on his blog he slams Hillary for her shamelessness, dishonesty, lack of integrity, inauthenticity, overweening ambition for the sake of power alone, etc. So Sullivan himself rejects an analysis purely on "the issues." He rejects Hillary and champions Obama almost entirely on questions of character and presumed genuine political agenda, as opposed to the stated political agenda.

But when an actual debate breaks out at a presidential debate -- one that is somewhat effective in exposing Obama's character flaws and also hints at his real political agenda (not-moderate-at-all left-liberalism), he shrieks it's all so "Rovian" and that we should talk about the "real issues."

Right. A debate on the "real issues" where both candidates say they agree with each other for two hours, except on the point of who can better execute the exact same program.

Michelle has a good round-up of the left's collective, coordinated freak-out and of course Hot Air's headlines have more. The typical liberal suspects -- Tom Shales, Greg Mitchell from E&P, etc. -- are all screaming about ABCNews' "despicable" performance in not giving The Media-Chosen One the pass he's enjoyed for most of the past year.


Oh, the Unfairness of It All: Cranky points out:

At Cuffy's Kos link: To put it bluntly, should a Former Clinton Official be the one asking GOP questions to Barack Tonight?!?

Was Stephanopolous a moderator at any Republican debates? Goose. Gander. Good stuff.

Oh, it's funny stuff, all right.

After 50 years, Hillary supporters are finally complaining that when the press falls in love (as they always do) with the more-liberal candidate, they are flagrantly unfair to the less-liberal one.

And suddenly Obama supporters realize there might be some small conflict of interest in former Clinton official George Stephanolopolous now acting as an "impartial" media talking head.

Welcome to the party, pals.

Posted by: Ace at 05:40 AM | Comments (25)
Post contains 912 words, total size 6 kb.

April 16, 2008

Debate Recap
Update: Frank Luntz's Focus Group

— Ace

The two most important clips from tonight's debate. more...

Posted by: Ace at 06:28 PM | Comments (74)
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.

Canadian Green candidate takes rational position on biofuels
— Purple Avenger

Vids below the fold. This greenie also rips one of the Canadian liberal candidates a new one regarding Canadians serving in Iraq (which some are as part of the long standing military exchange program between our two countries). The idiot liberal doesn't even know this and its part of his current portfolio.

No, I'm not going soft in the head and getting a boner for the greenies, I just thought this stuff was interesting. more...

Posted by: Purple Avenger at 06:28 PM | Comments (11)
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.

Stupid Debate Liveblog
— Ace

On ABC at 8:00 Eastern time. It'll be tape-delayed on the West Coast but Gabe says they'll be running a live webcast here.

We're going to try to liveblog this. I think we'll only have three or four (at most) decent clashes on the only thing we care about, and then 90 minutes of bullshit and blather. Still, I guess its worth watching. Sorta.

Posted by: Ace at 03:30 PM | Comments (185)
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.

An Aussie's Admiration [dri]
— Open Blog

Over at Blackfive, an email quoting an Australian trooper stationed in Iraq (and his father) has some very complimentary things to say about the American soldiers he has interacted with during his deployment.

"The Yanks (I hope you don't mind me using that word) are so professional from the top to the bottom that it is almost embarrassing to be in their company, and to call yourself a soldier....don't get me wrong, we are good at what we do but the Yanks are so much better.....they are complete at what they do, how they do it and their attitude is awesome....they don't complain they just get on with the job and they do it right."

“I carry a Minimi (SAW) so I am not real worried about a confrontation but I tell you I feel safer just knowing that the US Marines are close by....If we got into trouble I know that our boys would come running and we could deal with it but they would probably be passed by a load of Hummers. No questions asked, no glory sought, the Americans would just fight with us and for us because that is their nature, to protect those in need of protection."

The father of the Aussie soldier not only expresses his son's appreciation for the fine job our soldiers are doing over there but also reveals his own evolving esteem:

"...I say to you, as a foreigner and outsider, a nation is only a collection of its people and its attitude is the attitude of its people, collectively and as individuals. I am really glad you are here on this Earth and I respect you as a nation and as people."

It is good to hear that the Aussie's regard us as highly as we regard them.

Posted by: Open Blog at 01:51 PM | Comments (48)
Post contains 304 words, total size 2 kb.

Carrying the torch[John F Not Kerry]
— Open Blog

This is probably old, but with the Olympic torch being in the news lately, it is timely. Can you guess who came up with the idea of the torch and having a multinational procession? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

Click here for the fairly recent origins of what would seem like a millenias old tradition.

Posted by: Open Blog at 01:39 PM | Comments (21)
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.

How the Media Lost in Basra
— Ace

Veni, Vidi, Vichy.*

They wanted the US and Iraqis to lose so badly they just ignored the facts and claimed we had.

But once again they've lost some of the small amount of credibility they have left.

Thanks to CJ.


* Note that the media usually does not see and certainly does not come to the areas it reports upon with such authority (dare I say "uppitiness"?), the "vidi" and "vini" parts don't really apply.

What's the Latin for "I called a stringer/stooge on the phone" and "This other guy getting sloshed next to me in the Intercontinental Hotel Bar told me" ?

PS: A comment there suggests this as the best recap of the Basra fighting.

Posted by: Ace at 12:55 PM | Comments (31)
Post contains 129 words, total size 1 kb.

<< Page 21 >>
78kb generated in CPU 0.0445, elapsed 0.321 seconds.
44 queries taking 0.3009 seconds, 151 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.