December 07, 2009
— DrewM "I don't want to kill him"
But she did because she had to.
I was going to do some snark about loving a story with a happy ending but it's clear this woman is troubled by what she was forced to do. At least she'll be alive to deal with it.
Via @Andylevy
More on the story below the fold.
Seems like the guy was drunk or high on something.
The burglary suspect was identified as Bill Riley, 53. Investigators said he may have been under the influence of alcohol or narcotics.Mangion said Riley had been driving near the woman's house when he crashed his pickup truck.
It wasn't immediately clear why he went to Jackson's home.
"For me listening to the call the hardest part was hearing her pray for forgiveness, being put in a position that no one should ever have to be put into taking action in her own hands," said Joan Herd, a Lincoln County 911 dispatch who was on the phone with Jackson during the incident.
Jackson's family did not want to comment at this time.
Mangion said the case is being investigated as a homicide and information has been sent to the district attorney, who will determine whether if there will be any charges in this shooting. Under state law, Jackson was in the right to take legal action in self defense.
And in reality the chances of her facing any legal consequences appear to less than none.
Posted by: DrewM at
12:24 PM
| Comments (278)
Post contains 261 words, total size 2 kb.
I was going to do some snark about loving a story with a happy ending but it's clear this woman is going to troubled by what she was forced to do. At least she'll be alive to deal with it.
And I wouldn't be surprised if somehow the Commiecrats try to put her on trial for defending herself.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at December 07, 2009 12:25 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Rocks at December 07, 2009 12:26 PM (Q1lie)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 07, 2009 12:26 PM (l1Wlr)
Posted by: Schlippy at December 07, 2009 12:28 PM (xm1A1)
Posted by: Sarah Palin at December 07, 2009 12:29 PM (QKKT0)
She acted stupidly.
Posted by: Barack I, King of the World (D) at December 07, 2009 12:30 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: kathysaysso at December 07, 2009 12:30 PM (ZtwUX)
Yeah, if this is on the level, and it sounds like it is, snark wouldn't be called for.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 07, 2009 12:32 PM (ZGhSv)
Posted by: Cicero at December 07, 2009 12:32 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Vet Missing Parts at December 07, 2009 12:35 PM (MCHyX)
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at December 07, 2009 12:36 PM (Vu6sl)
There's not a jury in the land that would convict her. Especially if she was at home alone.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 07, 2009 12:36 PM (ZGhSv)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 07, 2009 12:37 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: Terry at December 07, 2009 12:37 PM (Vui52)
Kathysaysso -
I thought of that too, but then why should she? Announcing that she had a gun would most likely only make her situation more dangerous. I doubt he was remotely rational, and if he knew she had a gun, then what if he pulled out a gun and broke down the door with his pistol blazing? What if he looked for another avenue to enter the house and entered without her knowledge?
I feel sorry for her, it is something she is going to have to live with, but at least she will be in that position.
Posted by: headhunt23 at December 07, 2009 12:38 PM (OMCBg)
Makes it especially difficult if you're just a person defending themselves and their family. They didn't go looking for this, it came to them, and they had to make that decision.
I pray I never have to be in that spot.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Things, Stuff, and Other Things at December 07, 2009 12:38 PM (erIg9)
If he got OUT of the house she needs to drag the corpse back INTO the house before the police get there. Otherwise she can be charged even though he had broken in, if she shot him outside of the house.
If he's dead and his body is not IN the house, then she'll be arrested and have to go through an investigation to rule out murder. If he's dead after breaking into the house, and his body is still in the house where he was shot, then it's considered self defense unless some other evidence indicates otherwise and she won't necessarily be charged.
What I don't get about this is why you don't hear her yell any warning instructions like "stay back or I'll shoot" before she unloads the gun....(like maybe I know how *I'D* react in the same situation.....)
Posted by: Just a cynic.... at December 07, 2009 12:38 PM (v4UYp)
Posted by: nickless at December 07, 2009 12:38 PM (MMC8r)
Personally, I think she was in the right. The transcript didn't do the audio justice. Her begging for forgiveness was heart-wrenching.
Posted by: Helen Jones-Kelley at December 07, 2009 12:38 PM (cBeTr)
How about posting your address so I can put you on my "do not call" list?
Posted by: Jack the Ripper at December 07, 2009 12:39 PM (QKKT0)
She had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was and him not knowing where she was or that she was armed. If you yell out "hey I have a gun and I'm right over here" you lose the tactical advantage and could lose the battle.
Posted by: RobD at December 07, 2009 12:39 PM (sV3Dv)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 07, 2009 12:40 PM (ZGhSv)
13 For someone not wanting to kill somebody, wouldn't you think she'd yell out a warning like, "I've got a gun, motherf----, and it's aimed at your stomach. Get the hell off my property." before she pulled the trigger? Just wondering.
If your going to shoot, shoot, don't talk. Somebody kicking in your front door ain't there to talk about the weather.
Posted by: maddogg at December 07, 2009 12:40 PM (OlN4e)
Alarm system=dog barking. Try the next place down the road.
Cut the phone=No
Widow with a gun? see above
Posted by: hutch1200 at December 07, 2009 12:40 PM (QAtiI)
And in reality the chance of her facing any legal consequences appear to less than none.
I wouldn't be too sure of that,there have been cases where the families of criminals have sued in civil court and won financial judgments.
Posted by: bulwark at December 07, 2009 12:41 PM (jvrmc)
Posted by: maddogg at December 07, 2009 12:42 PM (OlN4e)
Hopefully. At worst, she would have to pay for her civil defense. If it comes to that, I hope good folks help her with that.
Bless her heart.
Posted by: The Nobel Peace Prize Committee (NPPC) at December 07, 2009 12:43 PM (uLHPW)
Exactly. I've seen enough bad shit happen to unarmed folks to remove any shred of forbearance for this piece of human trash breaking in. Hope he died, and that's no lie. Save the taxpayers a dime.
Posted by: Schlippy at December 07, 2009 12:43 PM (xm1A1)
Posted by: stitches at December 07, 2009 12:43 PM (JXF5g)
Posted by: Allah Pund It In My Ass at December 07, 2009 12:44 PM (L86Li)
This is where I start smelling a rat:
"Do you have a place you can go inside your house and lock yourself in a room?"
"ahhhhhh, not really."
Posted by: a.k.a. at December 07, 2009 12:44 PM (6zk5L)
Posted by: Amused Observer at December 07, 2009 12:45 PM (Uy/AI)
I'm thinking here's a woman who's watched enough Matlock, Murder She Wrote, and Perry Mason to concoct a murder and get away with it.
Posted by: a.k.a. at December 07, 2009 12:46 PM (6zk5L)
Posted by: reginaldL at December 07, 2009 12:46 PM (k6Tcc)
Posted by: RobD at December 07, 2009 12:47 PM (sV3Dv)
@ 52
Maybe she has those little balsa wood doors you can puch a hole in with your fist. Not much good, especially if he's already breaking in an exterior (solid) door.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 07, 2009 12:47 PM (ZGhSv)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 07, 2009 12:47 PM (MelQB)
NEVER warn someone that you have a gun. If you bring a gun into the equation, kill your target immediately. There is no halfway. No shooting to wound. No warning shot. No 'get away'.
That man could have had a gun or a buddy or just plain come back in five years.
If you bring a gun into the equation, you need to have decided it is time to kill. And that's really hard, as this woman shows us. Even a hardened man can have a hard time with this... really, they should at least.
Posted by: The Nobel Peace Prize Committee (NPPC) at December 07, 2009 12:47 PM (uLHPW)
Posted by: a.k.a. at December 07, 2009 04:44 PM (6zk5L)
Why? If a crazy guy busts down an exterior door or crashes through a window, a bathroom door with a lock only meant to keep someone from barging in on you while taking a piss isn't going to be much of a deterrent.
Most people don't have a commercial grade panic room in their home.
Posted by: DrewM. at December 07, 2009 12:48 PM (FCWQb)
Posted by: maddogg at December 07, 2009 12:48 PM (OlN4e)
Yeah, if this is on the level, and it sounds like it is, snark wouldn't be called for.
What do you mean? the looser garage invader who got his arm cut off at the forearm was one of greatest snarkest threads of all time....All Time
Posted by: Paladin at December 07, 2009 12:48 PM (bWB5j)
From this article: "The man picked up a patio table and threw it through the glass door and entered the home. The woman then shot him in the chest, Mangion said."
You throw a table through the glass door, you don't get a warning, you get a bullet.
Posted by: Amused Observer at December 07, 2009 12:49 PM (Uy/AI)
What do you mean? the looser garage invader who got his arm cut off at the forearm was one of greatest snarkest threads of all time....All Time
Shazbot, I missed that one.
Linky?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 07, 2009 12:51 PM (ZGhSv)
Bullshit. Even if the shoot was correct, moving the body (altering the evidence at a crime scene) is a ticket to the big house. In all 50 states, she'll have to go through an investigation no matter where the body ends up. More than likely, the body wouldn't be found in the same spot that she shot him anyway. Guns aren't infallible death-rays that kill immediately, he'd probably have time to move outside before expiring.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 07, 2009 12:52 PM (l1Wlr)
Just as the crime only has to be proven by a preponderance, so too does the self defense claim.
50 miles west of Tulsa is not a place where you're going to get far blaming society and guns for this dirtbag's "suicide by homeowner."
Just gotta feel bad for the lady. Good Christian woman like that (and that's all there is in BFE Oklahoma), had to feel terrible.
Posted by: moron # 234611234 at December 07, 2009 12:52 PM (p1s9n)
Posted by: hutch1200 at December 07, 2009 12:53 PM (QAtiI)
you don't shoot to "hurt" or just to "shoot" in a defensive situation. A shotty's gonna kill someone if they're close enough and right in front of it.
Posted by: moron # 2346524 at December 07, 2009 12:54 PM (p1s9n)
You've been reading or watching too many bad mystery novels.
Posted by: DrewM. at December 07, 2009 12:54 PM (FCWQb)
Guns aren't infallible death-rays that kill immediately, he'd probably have time to move outside before expiring.
A 16 ga. shotgun at close range is pretty much a death ray. Professional hunters go into brush tracking wounded lions with a 12 guage loaded with buckshot.
Posted by: maddogg at December 07, 2009 12:54 PM (OlN4e)
This is where I start smelling a rat:
"Do you have a place you can go inside your house and lock yourself in a room?"
"ahhhhhh, not really."
Posted by: a.k.a. at December 07, 2009 04:44 PM (6zk5L)
She was already inside her own home, Thats where the "retreat" ends.
Posted by: TC at December 07, 2009 12:55 PM (QXKjZ)
Posted by: Amused Observer at December 07, 2009 12:55 PM (Uy/AI)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 07, 2009 12:56 PM (ZGhSv)
Posted by: c02 emitting conservative at December 07, 2009 12:57 PM (SebJz)
Posted by: Naqamel at December 07, 2009 12:57 PM (UMwMT)
Posted by: Peaches at December 07, 2009 12:57 PM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: RobD at December 07, 2009 12:58 PM (sV3Dv)
Posted by: a.k.a.
This is where I start smelling a rat:
"Do you have a place you can go inside your house and lock yourself in a room?"
"ahhhhhh, not really."
Posted by: a.k.a.
I'm thinking here's a woman who's watched enough Matlock, Murder She Wrote, and Perry Mason to concoct a murder and get away with it.
Posted by: a.k.a.
ut she does sound a little suspicious to me. Too calm.
Posted by: a.k.a.
My God, you're stupid.
Posted by: Z Ryan at December 07, 2009 12:59 PM (cMo6P)
Granted. Then again, there's a reason that one of the USMC Rules for Gunfighting is "Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Bullets are cheap, life is expensive."
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 07, 2009 12:59 PM (l1Wlr)
"I was just shooting to stop. I was just shooting to stop. I was just shooting to stop."
Posted by: moron # 12353434 at December 07, 2009 01:01 PM (p1s9n)
Posted by: kathysaysso at December 07, 2009 01:04 PM (ZtwUX)
Poor bastard probably just needed to use the bathroom.
Like Sheriff Joe of Scranton once said:
When nature calls- nature calls.
Posted by: sartana at December 07, 2009 01:05 PM (KnIPh)
Wrong. You shoot to stop. Once the threat has ceased you stop shooting.
That is exactly how you explain it "I was in fear for my life so I stopped him." And then you say "I'll cooperate in your investigation in any way possible but would like to speak to my lawyer now." Then you shut up until you speak to the lawyer.
If you have a gun, and you practice for self defense you should also practice for criminal defense.
Posted by: ThomasD at December 07, 2009 01:05 PM (21H5U)
Posted by: ziske68 at December 07, 2009 01:05 PM (jwREC)
"I was just shooting to stop. I was just shooting to stop. I was just shooting to stop."
Exactly. You never, NEVER say that you were shooting to kill. Shoot to stop the threat.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 07, 2009 01:06 PM (l1Wlr)
a.k.a. suck mah balls
Second..motion carries.
BTW, Who said it wasn't a single shot weapon? A breech loading 16 guage won't offer much time to reload if you wound his shin.
Posted by: hutch1200 at December 07, 2009 01:08 PM (QAtiI)
Posted by: Freida Lay at December 07, 2009 01:08 PM (ax4Qo)
Posted by: maddogg at December 07, 2009 01:09 PM (OlN4e)
You are referring to semantics; i'm referring to action.
Posted by: Amused Observer at December 07, 2009 01:10 PM (Uy/AI)
Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at December 07, 2009 01:11 PM (9nNhO)
Posted by: maddogg at December 07, 2009 01:14 PM (OlN4e)
Depends on the State. Even in States that prohibit shooting them when running away most will not prosecute unless there are other factors.
Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2009 01:16 PM (CDUiN)
Posted by: RM at December 07, 2009 01:16 PM (1kwr2)
That doesn't make not a semantic issue. Nor does the one point negate the other. How is it functional different to shoot to stop then to shoot to kill (which is the only what to g'ntee a stop?) Action is one thing.
Then explaining you shot to stop: that's semantics. Not unimportant. Just different point.
Posted by: Amused Observer at December 07, 2009 01:16 PM (Uy/AI)
Posted by: hutch1200 at December 07, 2009 01:17 PM (QAtiI)
F off, libtard.
Posted by: Schlippy at December 07, 2009 01:18 PM (xm1A1)
Posted by: toby928 at December 07, 2009 01:18 PM (PD1tk)
A cop told me if I ever had to pick up a gun to shoot to kill. He also said that if I could remember, while I was shooting the person in the chest to yell, "Stop! I've got a gun!" and to not empty the clip.
After scumbag dead, then lay one into the ceiling. He said it would make it a lot easier for the cops ("She fired a warning shot"), but if I forgot all that and just plugged him, if I were home alone, the cops would consider it a taxpayer's money saving favor.
Cops aren't stupid. They know who the bad guys are. Lawyers don't.
Posted by: Biblio at December 07, 2009 01:18 PM (y5VNb)
Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at December 07, 2009 01:19 PM (9nNhO)
My wife had this same sort of incident, but the guy couldn't get into the house. 38 SW was ready if he did.
I still smell rat.
Recording saying she shot him outside, but he was breaking in?? She seems mighty calm. Why doesn't she fire off a round or let the guy see her with the gun.
She knows him, I am betting, and she's going to be indicted for murder.
Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2009 01:21 PM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at December 07, 2009 01:22 PM (jV9DU)
I know if I seen this guy on the street, I would hit an immediate orange.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at December 07, 2009 01:24 PM (pv+vj)
Posted by: hutch1200 at December 07, 2009 01:24 PM (QAtiI)
"For someone not wanting to kill somebody, wouldn't you think she'd yell out a warning like, "I've got a gun, motherf----, and it's aimed at your stomach. Get the hell off my property." before she pulled the trigger? Just wondering."
Yeah, that's smart, let the person know where you are by comprimising your position, what are you stupid?
Posted by: Todd at December 07, 2009 01:25 PM (LLOGQ)
Come on!
Listen to the call. Listen to the knocking on the door and tell me that's banging. It sounds like a pretty calm, but loud, knock to me.
And it's strange how she says "he's getting close to the door." What do you mean close to the door; he's standing right next to the door knocking!
And when the operator asks if the caller understands what he's saying, the caller ignores the operator's question and just repeats 'he's crazy.'
Posted by: a.k.a. President Preempt at December 07, 2009 01:29 PM (6zk5L)
No, it is not merely a matter of an after the fact explanation. It is also a matter of intent and mind set at the time of the event.
Posted by: ThomasD at December 07, 2009 01:32 PM (21H5U)
Also it was after midnight, her options were extremely limited I'd say.
Here in Canada, before you even pull out a gun you've got to be sure they have a gun, or you'll be going to jail.
"Excuse me crazy person, are you armed with a firearm? Eh?"
"YEARRRGH!@ ULUOPLOOOM!"
Juries in Canada aren't much help.
Posted by: 5Cats at December 07, 2009 01:34 PM (O5yP8)
Killing people is something that is not taken lightly.
Posted by: Alaska Paul at December 07, 2009 01:34 PM (rMkgW)
Why is so hard to believe she shot this man, then called the sheriff, banged on the door while she was on the phone, and then fired her shotgun again?
Did you hear the operator tell her she could protect herself with the gun? Maybe that was the green light she was waiting for because a few seconds later she shot him.
Posted by: a.k.a. President Preempt at December 07, 2009 01:35 PM (6zk5L)
She said she shot him going out the front. But I thought she said he was breaking in the back door?
Posted by: a.k.a. President Preempt at December 07, 2009 01:36 PM (6zk5L)
She was awfully quiet right up until she blasted him. She was whispering to 911 operator. Perhaps the death could have been avoided if she screamed at the dude that she was prepared to blast him. But apart from that, I know for sure it could have been avoided if dude had refrained from attempting to enter the dwelling house of another.
Posted by: California Red at December 07, 2009 01:38 PM (7uWb8)
See my post at 86, Todd. Then kindly go bang on some doors in Oklahoma, fuckwad.
Posted by: kathysaysso at December 07, 2009 01:38 PM (ZtwUX)
Are you anti-gun, anti-self-defense, anti-woman, or just anti-common sense?
Posted by: EastCoastBroad at December 07, 2009 01:38 PM (6Q4Mq)
120
Why is so hard to believe she shot this man, then called the sheriff, banged on the door while she was on the phone, and then fired her shotgun again?
Ever hear of Occam's razor?
Posted by: maddogg at December 07, 2009 01:39 PM (OlN4e)
yeah, I'm anti-gun, what gave it away?
what the fuck is wrong with you people? And I heard what she said.
Sounds like she kicked the screen door open and fired the weapon.
Posted by: a.k.a. President Preempt at December 07, 2009 01:42 PM (6zk5L)
Posted by: 1sttofight at December 07, 2009 01:42 PM (G9MiL)
Posted by: t.ferg at December 07, 2009 01:42 PM (nF4Jh)
Remember the one about the elderly gent who asked a punk to please quiet down when he was screaming at a woman's house next door in the middle of the night? Punk pulled out a pistol and smashed the old guy across the face with it, and then stood over him screaming "You want a piece of me?".
Turns out the pistol was just a CO2 gun, but the Glock .40 the old man pulled out of his jacket was the real thing, and he drilled the punk dead on the spot.
The story went on that when the detective was taking his statement, and the old-timer kept recounting how the punk had kept screaming "You want a piece of me?!!", the detective said "Okay, we'll put you down for a 'Yes' on that one."
Posted by: sherlock at December 07, 2009 01:48 PM (ktKOD)
126 what the fuck is wrong with you people? - a.k.a.
I've about had it with your stupidity bubby. Did you even glance at the link?
Here's some clues dude:
-around 12:30 a.m. to report that she was home alone
-For nearly 10 minutes the man continued banging at the door and yelling profanities, threatening the woman.
-The man picked up a patio table and threw it through the glass door and entered the home
-"I shot him. I'm going out front. I hit him. God help me," Jackson said
Sounds like a fake to you now? Eh Sherlock? We only hear PART of the recording, get it? Yelling, threatening? Table through the door? Entered the house, yeah obviously a staged murder... yutz!
Posted by: 5Cats at December 07, 2009 01:50 PM (O5yP8)
Here in Canada, before you even pull out a gun you've got to be sure they have a gun, or you'll be going to jail.
"Excuse me crazy person, are you armed with a firearm? Eh?"
"YEARRRGH!@ ULUOPLOOOM!"
Juries in Canada aren't much help.
Posted by: 5Cats at December 07, 2009 05:34 PM (O5yP
--Is that true? I have contemplated getting a shotgun. If anyone were to break into my house while I'm here, they would probably just be high and not heavily armed. I figure just cocking the gun would send them scurrying like hell.
Posted by: logprof at December 07, 2009 01:52 PM (I3Udb)
Posted by: a.k.a. President Preempt at December 07, 2009 05:43 PM (6zk5L)
The stupidity.
Here's hoping you are never in this position. You'll wish you had a shotgun and not just your dick in your hand.
Posted by: DrewM. at December 07, 2009 01:54 PM (FCWQb)
Posted by: 1sttofight at December 07, 2009 01:55 PM (G9MiL)
1sttofight,
There's no "splainin" to some people. That was not Santa knocking at that poor woman's door. Not the Avon lady, not Jehovah Witnesses. She did her community a service by taking out the trash. Nice Mossberg, by the way.
Posted by: Tommy Gunn at December 07, 2009 01:56 PM (rQTdM)
If it doesn't, then you're going to need the stopping power of a shotgun.
Get a pump action, really gets their attention. 12 gauge, where even bird shot is going to be plenty fatal in an indoor environment.
Posted by: Naqamel at December 07, 2009 01:57 PM (UMwMT)
It's what I would do... in fact, when I watched the video, I pooped a little.
Posted by: a.k.a. at December 07, 2009 02:00 PM (pD9ab)
This is really sad.
Posted by: seattle slough at December 07, 2009 02:00 PM (JRGA6)
It makes sense that he might go to the nearest house and bang on a door.
yeah, and throw a table through the door because he's so disoriented?
Is this a sockpuppet of Seasshole Slough?
Posted by: a.k.a. President Preempt at December 07, 2009 02:04 PM (6zk5L)
144
What an idiot. Not you, the perp. If you approach a home in rural America you'd better have your hat in your hand, no matter what your sobriety.
Posted by: Tommy Gunn at December 07, 2009 02:05 PM (rQTdM)
If it doesn't, then you're going to need the stopping power of a shotgun.
Get a pump action, really gets their attention. 12 gauge, where even bird shot is going to be plenty fatal in an indoor environment.
Posted by: Naqamel at December 07, 2009 05:57 PM (UMwMT)
--Yes, the noisier the better. I want deterrent power as wel as stopping power. I would not want to clean scumbag DNA from my house if it can be pre-empted.
Posted by: Admiral John F. Kerry, Triple Purple Heart at December 07, 2009 02:06 PM (I3Udb)
Posted by: 1sttofight at December 07, 2009 02:06 PM (G9MiL)
"may" "probably" "likely" "might" "presumably"
What is sad is how many anti-gun liberals break their backs bending over backwards to strain and distort a simple self-defense incident into sympathy for the perpetrator.
Posted by: angler at December 07, 2009 02:07 PM (Yv052)
Posted by: Bill H at December 07, 2009 02:10 PM (q8CmE)
YEah logprof, it's not widely enforced luckily, and might not apply in Quebec (which has its own seperate laws).
Usually the mantra of "I thought he had a gun" will get you out of trouble. Of course Crown Prosicutors are all about copping a plea eh?
Good luck getting a firearm! Hopefully the Conservatives will ditch the Registration Act soon. Still, there's the whole FAC thingie...
Posted by: 5Cats at December 07, 2009 02:11 PM (O5yP8)
It was hard to listen to her ask for forgiveness. I teared up a bit. I feel confident that I would be able to shoot if I had to, but I don't ever want to have to, and I can't imagine how it would feel to extinguish a human life.
Posted by: JeepGirl at December 07, 2009 02:12 PM (mZFDY)
Posted by: flowers at December 07, 2009 04:33 PM (6zk5L)
(pssssttt...it's me, Dave, open the door!)
Dave's not here!!
Posted by: Bill H at December 07, 2009 02:14 PM (q8CmE)
Posted by: planck6626 at December 07, 2009 02:16 PM (MTiGw)
Did your mommas drop all ya'll leftwingers on your heads when you were babies ?
Posted by: awkward davies at December 07, 2009 02:16 PM (wb68R)
Posted by: Todd at December 07, 2009 02:16 PM (LLOGQ)
Posted by: KDH at December 07, 2009 02:18 PM (JiKZx)
Good luck getting a firearm! Hopefully the Conservatives will ditch the Registration Act soon. Still, there's the whole FAC thingie...
Posted by: 5Cats at December 07, 2009 06:11 PM (O5yP
--Yeah, I am not super worried; car theft is a bigger problem here. My house is just over 30 years old, and until last year it had regular locks which, especially with the front door, could have easily been opened just by smashing the glad and reaching in. Despite that, nothing has happened all this time. Mine's a quiet, safe neighborhod that I can stroll around any time of night, and have. On one of these strolls I did not close the door all the way and when I got back it was a little open, and nothing happened for an hour. Now I have double bolt locks on both doors, and also an alarm system which pretty much pays for itself with the insurance discount. I'll see about the gun --my wife may not like.
Posted by: logprof at December 07, 2009 02:19 PM (I3Udb)
"Guns Don't Kill People, Cops Telling Homeowners They May Fire A Weapon Based Only On a Third-Hand Account of the 911 Operator Kill People."
Alas, too small for a bumper sticker. I'll have to go with "Invade My Home, Even If Drunk = Death By Buckshot."
Posted by: Sharkman at December 07, 2009 02:19 PM (Zj8fM)
Posted by: gun wielding gangbanger at December 07, 2009 02:21 PM (pa37h)
132 , 138
Hahaha! I don't need facts or other things like you morons! I know what happened, who done it and everything else too!
Why should I explain it? Anyhow that article might be part of a vast right-wing conspiracy, you never know!
You never know what's fake, unless it's reported on MSNBC, then it's true.
Posted by: a.k.a. President Preempt at December 07, 2009 02:21 PM (O5yP8)
166 facts:
old lady home alone
shotgun
intruder breaking in
dead intruder
this is a logical outcome, i salute this woman
Posted by: gun wielding gangbanger at December 07, 2009 02:23 PM (pa37h)
Just directing your attention to those two posts a.k.a. care to take any of your silly ideas back? Now's a good time, eh?
Sorry gwg (pa37h) 166 was me!
Posted by: 5Cats at December 07, 2009 02:27 PM (O5yP8)
what about lethal attack cats?
my boys would scratch the hell out of the bad guys ankles
(unless he fed them, little traitors)
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 07, 2009 02:27 PM (pa37h)
No snark from me either. That's tough, all the way around.
I really have to hand it to the person who took that call, telling this woman that it was OK to defend herself. It sounds like she gave all the help she could.
Posted by: FireHorse at December 07, 2009 02:28 PM (Vl5GH)
Posted by: Todd at December 07, 2009 02:28 PM (LLOGQ)
"That is exactly how you explain it "I was in fear for my life so I stopped him." And then you say "I'll cooperate in your investigation in any way possible but would like to speak to my lawyer now." Then you shut up until you speak to the lawyer.
If you have a gun, and you practice for self defense you should also practice for criminal defense."
This is EXACTLY right.
Posted by: Nick J at December 07, 2009 02:30 PM (ffZ2N)
176 under the arm? dude, we call those widow makers, get a nice hip tuck-in concealed holster
lunch? you buying?
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 07, 2009 02:31 PM (pa37h)
174 what about lethal attack cats?
Lolz navycopjoe! My pudding cats (they're fat and sweet!) are lethal too, if you trip over one!
I warn you! I've got a kitteh and I'm not afraid to use it !!!
Posted by: 5Cats at December 07, 2009 02:33 PM (O5yP8)
5cats, ooooh, bad no no, ace hands out serious asskickings for that
but to add more in, if i came home drunk and loud and busted out the door at my own house i would stand a good chance of eating 8slug
i say good on her
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 07, 2009 02:34 PM (pa37h)
http://bit.ly/4LpApy
Posted by: Nick J at December 07, 2009 02:36 PM (ffZ2N)
180 my boys would attack, stop to clean themselves, fall asleep
now if the intruder was a gecko, things would be different
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 07, 2009 02:36 PM (pa37h)
"get a nice hip tuck-in concealed holster"
Tried it once, could not get used to it
As for lunch, what the hell, what are you having?
Posted by: Todd at December 07, 2009 02:39 PM (LLOGQ)
Get a pump action, really gets their attention. 12 gauge, where even bird shot is going to be plenty fatal in an indoor environment.
Posted by: Naqamel at December 07, 2009 05:57 PM (UMwMT)
Not Necesssarily!
Posted by: Dick Cheney at December 07, 2009 02:41 PM (5M2Wr)
i am taking my little sickling out to dennys as soon as she gets dressed
she loves the chicken strips and soup so i'll do the same i guess
nothing like a flu bug to knock the energy out of a 8 yo
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 07, 2009 02:46 PM (pa37h)
Here's what likely happened: (and I realize this woman couldn't have known any of this)
He's drunk. It's cold and there in the middle of nowhere. He has no cell phone. He crashes his car. (all this we can infer from the article)
He goes to the nearest house and bangs on the door. (this we also can infer) No answer. Now one of two things happens:
(1) He sees her, and gets frustrated that she won't talk to him and let him in. She spends 32 minutes whispering on the phone while he's freezing his tail off outside. He makes an idiotic decision to force his way into the house and she kills him.
Or (2) he never sees her and breaks into what he believes is an abandoned house to get out of the elements and call a tow truck/aid car.
And where does she live that they can't get a unit out to her house in 32 f-ing minutes?
He's not necessarily a burglar. He's clearly a trespasser.
This doesn't appear to be a burglary as his vehicle is presumably nearby and inoperable.
Posted by: seattle slough at December 07, 2009 02:54 PM (JRGA6)
Or (2) he never sees her and breaks into what he believes is an abandoned house to get out of the elements and call a tow truck/aid car.
____________________________________________
1) You're a
2) fucking dumbass.
Posted by: Nick J at December 07, 2009 03:06 PM (ffZ2N)
Seattle Slough, you're a complete dumbass. Friendly people don't bash in the windows. I'd do exactly the same thing if someone busted in my house at night.
If he got OUT of the house she needs to drag the corpse back INTO the house before the police get there. Otherwise she can be charged even though he had broken in, if she shot him outside of the house.
If he's dead and his body is not IN the house, then she'll be arrested and have to go through an investigation to rule out murder. If he's dead after breaking into the house, and his body is still in the house where he was shot, then it's considered self defense unless some other evidence indicates otherwise and she won't necessarily be charged.
That isn't true in Oklahoma. Oklahoma has very broad "castle doctrine" laws. She could shoot him legally as soon as he kicked in a door or window whether he came inside or not. Not that it matters--no Oklahoma jury would convict her anyway.
Grim
Posted by: Grim at December 07, 2009 03:09 PM (gyNYk)
"He's not necessarily a burglar. He's clearly a trespasser. "
Yeppers - Charles Manson was not a burglar, just a trespasser. If an armed citizen has confronted Manson breaking in, should they have just "ass"umed he was a lesser threat, given the benefit of the doubt, and ........ ??
Posted by: MDr at December 07, 2009 03:16 PM (ucq49)
What makes you think I'm here for your amusement?
Do whatever the fuck you want to do but if you think use of deadly force means shoot to kill then I'd recommend either moving to Texas or saving up for a really fat retainer.
Posted by: ThomasD at December 07, 2009 03:19 PM (21H5U)
*sigh*
The article says he banged for 10 minutes, then tried to break in. The whole recording was 32 minutes (which includes some time after the cops arrive, I'd suppose). Plus the article says he was threatening her, not pleading for help, dumbass = ss.
Either way, what other protection does she have? A restraining order? lolz!
(1) he could hav gone to the road and waited for another car, gotten help that way.
(2) he could have returned to his truck for shelter. (if his truck was burning that'd keep him warm too)
(3) he could (probably) could have taken shelter in a shed or barn, these are rarely locked in the country (so I'm told, they just lock the ones with valuable stuff)
(4) he could have gone to seattle slough's house and warmed himself by ass-raping ss, then setting ss on fire.
Do lefties NEVER read the article?
Posted by: 5Cats at December 07, 2009 03:24 PM (O5yP8)
Cincinnati, Columbus, Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, just to name a few I have personal experience with. The list of ones I've read about in the news is longer; usually with a WTF reason for no/delayed cop response.
Then when you get rural areas, like this appears to be, that are 10 minutes away in ideal conditions from the closest small town that you pass through if you blink and have maybe a sheriff...maybe...and the closest big town is 20 minutes away (hint, some cousins live in areas like this), it's easy to see how it could take 32 minutes for cops to get there.
Posted by: Ranba Ral at December 07, 2009 03:24 PM (atxR0)
Posted by: MAJHAM@GTMO at December 07, 2009 03:30 PM (k9sLf)
Hurm... on rerunning, the ad disappears. Might be a cookie thing, or maybe YouTube had the good sense to yank it.
If the dirtbag's survivors dare to bring suit, she should definitely countersue the estate for the damage to her patio doors and table, gunshot damage to her house, bloodstains and emotional distress.
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at December 07, 2009 03:35 PM (xqhoO)
Yeah, because home invasions never end badly for the homeowners.
Marquis of Queensbury rules, old chaps. Remember, do not fire unless fired upon!
Hey aka, enjoy that assraping. After all, you wouldn't want anyone to think you staged a racist murder at your house.
Posted by: moron # 23461156 at December 07, 2009 03:39 PM (p1s9n)
I doubt that any court in OK would hear a lawsuit by the perps survivors either. Still, it's profound to take a life, even if justified. Bless her. I teared up a little too listening to her. She's very strong, with a compassionate heart.
Posted by: stace at December 07, 2009 03:44 PM (g/wgk)
Gras is either fat or liver, I forget which, as in pâté de foie gras.
Grace is mercy, as in a death blow.
Sorry, it's compulsive with me.
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at December 07, 2009 03:45 PM (xqhoO)
Posted by: Faye Kinnit at December 07, 2009 03:46 PM (l1oyw)
Or (2) he never sees her and breaks into what he believes is an abandoned house to get out of the elements and call a tow truck/aid car.
And where does she live that they can't get a unit out to her house in 32 f-ing minutes?
He's not necessarily a burglar. He's clearly a trespasser.
This doesn't appear to be a burglary as his vehicle is presumably nearby and inoperable.
Posted by: seattle slough at December 07, 2009 06:54 PM (JRGA6)
--A similar scenrio happened in one of the godawful stretches of Season 2 of 24, only with a convenience store. Also stupid.
Posted by: logprof at December 07, 2009 03:49 PM (I3Udb)
Posted by: ThomasD
Simpleton! Do you not know that discharging a firearm IS considered Deadly Force? "Shooting to wound" is a grade-school, comic book, seen too many cowboy movies mindset. You can shoot a person in the pinky and they can die from sepsis, yet the shooting is the catalyst. You can thank lawyers for that shit.
If you are put in the position to drop the hammer on someone, you had best do it until they are unable to continue their assault on you. If you tell anyone you were just trying to hurt him/her, you are gonna get sued.
Bottom line: If you break down in the country, you had best be on your best behavior when approaching a homestead. If you don't get a response, LEAVE, even if you know someone is in there. They are not required to help your sorry ass.
Posted by: TXMarko at December 07, 2009 03:56 PM (c78Jk)
#35
Falsifying the scene is a big no no!! Even if a shoooting is justified, if it is found out it will be used against you in trial and it can sway a jury as to your credibilty.
Posted by: Mark at December 07, 2009 03:59 PM (7MnBG)
Warning shots should not be used. The noise of a gunshot inside will deafen you for quite a while and the muzzle flash can ruin your night vision. It;s not exactly a good idea to be deaf and partially blind with a gun in your hand(s) and a bad guy or guys around. If you insist on firing warning shots at night, remove the front sight so the gun comes out easier after the bad guy jams it up your ass.
Posted by: Peter at December 07, 2009 04:07 PM (DvLHy)
Posted by: ThomasD at December 07, 2009 07:19 PM (21H5U)
Um, Thomas, far be it from me to explain the English language to you, but it seems to me that the explaination for deadly force is force that, more often than not, causes death, i.e., 'shoot to kill'. Frankly, you can do fuck you want to do, but the first motherfucker that breaks into my house with me or mine in it is going to leave well ventilated, I honestly don't care what the applicable laws are here in California. Another thing- if you aren't prepared to destroy your target, you better leave that gun in the locked case with the gunlock in it and the ammo stored elsewhere in the house, because you aren't prepared to use it, and you stand a pretty good chance of having it taken away from you. You don't shoot to warn, or maim, or wing. Those are not deadly force. You shoot to kill. That's what deadly force is.
Posted by: Bill H at December 07, 2009 04:09 PM (q8CmE)
She must have reeeeally been in the boondocks......or not.
Posted by: pajama momma at December 07, 2009 04:12 PM (275r1)
Posted by: Mark at December 07, 2009 04:13 PM (7MnBG)
What the heck? She was on the phone with the operator for 10 minutes? That's an awfully long time. Where were the cops?
Remember, Momma- when seconds count, the cops are only minutes away.
Posted by: Bill H at December 07, 2009 04:14 PM (q8CmE)
Yeah, that's exactly why I prefer to be armed.
Posted by: pajama momma at December 07, 2009 04:15 PM (275r1)
Posted by: pajama momma at December 07, 2009 08:15 PM (275r1)
Exactamundo. After having lived in San Diego for a while, you know there's some truth to that mantra.
Posted by: Bill H at December 07, 2009 04:19 PM (q8CmE)
Posted by: pajama momma at December 07, 2009 04:21 PM (275r1)
Not me. If someone puts as much energy into breaking into my home as that man did, I'm not gonna take the time to give him a warning. I don't think I'd feel I had the time.
If you're that wasted that you have to break into a glass patio door, you're not gonna stop when someone gives you a warning. Also, there's no way she could go in another room to hide, he was gonna break through that one as well.
Posted by: pajama momma at December 07, 2009 04:25 PM (275r1)
"Is someone actually saying shoot to wound?"
But that's what Barney or Bert & Ernie would have done. In times bygone - Hopalong Cassidy. Roy Rogers. Gene Autry. Marshall Dillon.
Posted by: MDr at December 07, 2009 04:27 PM (ucq49)
Posted by: SFC MAC at December 07, 2009 04:30 PM (cuNX0)
Posted by: hutch1200 at December 07, 2009 04:39 PM (QAtiI)
Posted by: jewells at December 07, 2009 04:43 PM (lv7H+)
Posted by: logprof at December 07, 2009 04:49 PM (I3Udb)
Thank god she had a gun. The cops didn't get there in time to help her at all.
The police cannot defend us. We must defend ourselves.
I'd rather this man broke into the home of gun-control statists and had his way with them.
Posted by: Trump at December 07, 2009 05:01 PM (hK2Ya)
Try to pay attention.
I'm not the one advocating shoot to wound. Re-read my initial post:
Even the police (or defense classes) will tell you to shoot to kill. (I'm quoting another poster here)
Wrong. You shoot to stop. Once the threat has ceased you stop shooting.
That is exactly how you explain it "I was in fear for my life so I stopped him." And then you say "I'll cooperate in your investigation in any way possible but would like to speak to my lawyer now." Then you shut up until you speak to the lawyer.
If you have a gun, and you practice for self defense you should also practice for criminal defense.
Yes, I'm well aware that firing a gun at someone is lethal force.
My point is that even when the law says lethal force it justified it does not give you license to kill. And if you approach it with the mindset that you are trying to kill someone,(as opposed to merely stopping the threat) and that person really does die you could find yourself in a world of legal hurt, particularly if there is any indication that you continued to apply lethal force after the threat had ceased.
Posted by: ThomasD at December 07, 2009 05:04 PM (21H5U)
Perhaps she KNEW what that shotgun would do. Maybe she KNEW it would kill a person. She was no dummy. And obviously a good shot. I only heard one shot fired. I could be wrong.
But, the woman was no stranger to the gun.
Bless her. I hope she's okay.
I don't care how he is. He shouldn't have broken in the home. Period.
Posted by: Me at December 07, 2009 05:09 PM (ZhMZ3)
Posted by: Vince at December 07, 2009 05:12 PM (2biCU)
"NEVER warn someone that you have a gun."
HEY, I HAVE A BASEBALL BAT, AND I'LL USE IT! KA-CHUNK (sound of shell being chambered)
Posted by: Pelayo at December 07, 2009 05:21 PM (8NGHm)
Jeez. This sounds f*ckin awful. Fire off a shot in the air first. Bet that would have stopped him cold-assuming he was sober-which he probably wasn't. But still, first shot should be a warning shot. Big, loud scary gunshot near a would be intruder usually does the trick. Seems she had plenty of warning time to make a better decision than the one she made. I mean the guy was knocking. Knocking. I mean what about a shot to the leg? How good a shot is this woman?
I don't know if I have a huge amount of sympathy for this woman. Yes protect yourself in your own home with a gun. Totally fine with that. But in this precise case-- seems like this intruder could have been stopped without deadly force. She did the exact thing she seemed to sincerely not want to do. Kill a man. How bout wound a man. Way less legal hassle and emotional turmoil.
Posted by: TheJane at December 07, 2009 05:53 PM (FFDEd)
Posted by: Pelayo at December 07, 2009 06:01 PM (8NGHm)
Posted by: DebinIA at December 07, 2009 06:23 PM (iwbK9)
This is precisely why I'm going to teach my children (should I ever have any) that solving problems peaceably is the way to go, but that there'll be times when there's nothing left to do but buy some shells for their glocks.
Posted by: Bernrome at December 07, 2009 06:26 PM (QNgjY)
Posted by: Midwest_Pilot at December 07, 2009 06:37 PM (auypO)
Bottom line,
she knows the guy or he's an x lover etc, she's going to jail.
Even in OK you can get away with staging a killing.
The more you listen to this the fishy-er it gets. When my wife called me went they guy was trying to break in, because 911 was not coming anytime soon, she wasn't too rational. Where is the fucking pistol!!
This woman calmly pulls out a 12 ga and blasts this guy away.
Fish, smells like fish. I would love to let her kill the guy, but killing an X lover is MURDER!
Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2009 06:42 PM (2+9Yx)
Interesting. That's how I heard it too. Her son is also a police chief and I'm sure he's told her (as my dad who's a sheriff's deputy tells me) shoot to kill!!!
Posted by: pajama momma at December 07, 2009 08:04 PM (275r1)
Posted by: KDH at December 07, 2009 08:12 PM (JiKZx)
In Wichita, KS, BTK (Bind, Torture and Kill), who killed many women, knocked politely on their front door, in a "dog catcher's uniform, wearing a badge" he wanted you to open your door so he could talk to you. He had a clipboard, and a briefcase full of ropes and plastic bags, and he wanted to get close enough to you to grab you, and over-power you, even if you had a small child in your arms. Then he tied you up, killed your children if they were causing problems, and had weird sex with you, or mostly on you, until he had enough and then he suffocated you slowly so he could watch your face while you died. When he came to your front door he had already quietly gone into your backyard and found your phone line and cut it outside the home.
This Oklahoma case was a no-brainer, who trespasses and then walks around a strangerÂ’s home for 10 to 12 minutes at 12:40 AM in the night, kicking and beating every door and window trying to break it? A normal person with car trouble, without a cell phone, might just start knocking politely on the front door so you will open it to talk. You should hope it isnÂ’t BTK. This intruder clearly knew she was in the house, she had turned on all the lights first to scare him off, he only tried harder to get in, then later she was smart enough to turned the inside lights off again to gain a defensive advantage.
Some people have suggested that she should have to “shoot the knife or gun out of his hand”, or “shoot him in the leg” don’t consider how fast things are moving. She also had to shoot a silhouette, who was moving, and had just stepped out of the light into the darkness of her kitchen. Even police officers who are on the range on a regular basis don’t have the skills to shoot to wound someone. What if the gun misfires, the next bullet is too old to work, or the gun jams and won’t fire again, or is a five shot revolver and you miss five times going for the shoulder, since you will probably will miss the shoulder or leg entirely. The intruder only has to lunge 6 to 10 feet to get his hand on your gun and use it on you or your family. After listening to the tape this lady, remained calm, immediately called 911, waited and begged for police help for 12 minutes, and then very reluctantly did what most people should do in the same situation. If you like to get drunk and beat on doors yell for people to let you in, I suggest you get your affairs in order for your heirs. At least 50% of the homes in America are ready to exercise their right to not be a victim.
Posted by: Midwest_Pilot at December 07, 2009 08:14 PM (auypO)
"Ya, It's a hell of a thing killing a man. You take all he has and all he will ever have.."
Clint Eastwood in Unforgiven.
Posted by: sodak at December 07, 2009 08:20 PM (EaKpn)
pajama momma - Great explanation, you have it exactly right, but I live a city of 500,000 and the average day and night response time to my residential area is 18-19 minutes. That means some are 5 minutes and some are 30 minutes or more. If you are a woman or man and think the police are your first line of defense, you are exactly what today's violent criminals look for in a homeowner. Security systems and neighborhood watch signs don't mean anything to a group of 3 thugs, high on meth, hoping to catch you by surprise, take your valuables and leave no eyewitnesses. If you get 911 dialed fast enough, at least they will have a recording of your murder to help them understand what happened.
Posted by: Midwest_Pilot at December 07, 2009 08:27 PM (auypO)
Posted by: pajama momma at December 07, 2009 08:40 PM (275r1)
Posted by: pajama momma at December 07, 2009 08:41 PM (275r1)
TheJane, you have no clue what you're talking about.
You don't shoot to wound a bad guy. Bad guy is injured, bad guy lawyers up and sues you for everything you've got, sympathetic jury ruins you, bad guy comes and kills you later.
You shoot to stop the threat. If you're not willing to do that, don't own a gun.
There was a story last year out of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. A woman gets raped. Reports it to the cops, but since it was a stranger she couldn't identify him. A week later, he breaks into the same basement window he broke into before, shuts off her electricity, and heads up the stairs.
When he breaks through the basement door, she ventilates him with the shotgun a friend has lent her.
He raped her once; he was very likely returning to kill her.
Shoot to stop the threat.
Posted by: Palandine at December 07, 2009 08:42 PM (+ho3C)
You are right, KDH is living in the real world, and did a great job explaining it. We have at least 15 states on the brink of bankruptcy, along with the entire USA. When one of these states stops sending out unemployment checks, welfare checks, food stamps or stops paying their law enforcement people, you will see the cities turn into New Orleans in 24 to 48 hours with looting for valuables in stores and homes.
Living in the Midwest, we will at least have more armed citizens defending their families and property. The big cities with gun control laws, the citizens will experience a living hell. Even if the police elect to stand their ground and work for free for a few weeks, they will be overpowered by mobs similar to the Rodney King riots. Stores will be looted first for stuff, money, valuables and food, then they will start working on the homes. The nicer the homes, the more the mobs will hope to get when the break in and overpower the occupants.
Sound impossible, ask youself who will loan these states more money? Obama? Where will he get enough to fund all the states in need? What one item of progress is being made to increase employment, business profits and tax revenues? How many things is Congress working on that are going in the wrong direction and will cause more businesses to shut their doors and let their employees go. So many new laws and entitlements will place a bigger burden on the producers and shrink business activties and tax revenues at the state and federal levels. I hope I am wrong but if you plan to buy a gun and ammunition and learn hoow to use it after the riots start, you might want to rethink that plan.
Posted by: Midwest_Pilot at December 07, 2009 09:07 PM (auypO)
Police in Minnesota have arrested a man after he allegedly threw a tomato at Sarah Palin that struck two police officers instead.
Posted by: Heinz PD plays catch up at December 07, 2009 09:34 PM (d7Px0)
Furthermore, if, as in this guy's case, he'd already broken the front door, what's to stop him from breaking the bathroom door? Or, if he's armed, firing through it?
As another poster pointed out, few people outside of Hollywood, or a billionaires' enclave, have fully armed and equipped safe rooms to retire to; that's just a fantasy.
So, if you get drunk or stoned, do it at home. Don't go out, crash your car, then stumble up to somebody's door, bellowing, banging windows and shouting threats. And, if you do, don't be surprised if you aren't exactly met with a warm welcome.
As for all you guys thinking this was a set-up---you should have been writing for "Monk" before it went off the air! I can just see the episode now!
MONK: (Lining up all his pencils) "Well, you see, I could tell, by the handy-wipe she left on the floor, and the used tube of Noxema on the counter, she was really Fifi Baboom-Boom, the notorious lady cat burglar from a few years back! The man was actually her old partner, Ralphie Ding-Dong, who wanted to know where she'd hidden the buried treasure they'd stolen from Montenegro! She staged the call to 9/11, then, cleverly had her army of trained cats pull the body outside. In fact, it was actually one of the cats---fixed up with a human voice box---who made the 9/11 call!
WACKY GIRL ASSISTANT: Cheee, Mr. Monk, yer BRILLIANT!
Posted by: Rhinestone Suderman at December 08, 2009 06:39 AM (TafJB)
2. The bastard is as good as dead if I am a gunowner and someone is violating my property.
3. If you have not walked in her shoes, don't even try to say woulda, coulda, shoulda. You don't know.
Posted by: DefendUSA at December 08, 2009 11:42 AM (N/UtO)
Posted by: TheJane at December 08, 2009 12:50 PM (FFDEd)
For those still interested, the DA announced it was justifiable today.
Posted by: digitalbrownshirt at December 09, 2009 03:17 PM (/O0iM)
Posted by: ¥»¥Õ¥ì´ÊñÅÐÏ¿ at April 18, 2010 05:30 PM (Wm0xI)
Posted by: ÍøÍѤǤ¤ë¥»¥Õ¥ì at April 26, 2010 01:36 AM (/zba0)
Comments Source: http://www.ghdsstraighteners.com/
Posted by: CHI Straighteners at May 11, 2010 10:46 PM (nrPSj)
Message from : http://www.chibuy.org/
Posted by: CHI Straighteners at May 11, 2010 11:36 PM (nrPSj)
They Ugg classic cardy boots come in all sorts of colors, styles and designs and are very popular in the US and Canada.
Posted by: 123456 at May 13, 2010 02:40 AM (1H6wF)
Posted by: rajudyog at May 20, 2010 07:28 PM (GnL3k)
<a href="http://www.rajudyog.com/">SLIDING GATE OPENER MANUFACTURERS</a>
Posted by: rajudyog at May 20, 2010 07:28 PM (GnL3k)
Posted by: designer handbags reviews at June 16, 2010 07:14 PM (fUihS)
I have read your article.Article is very interesting,thanks for your sharing.Silk Scarf is the essential single product to every woman, and no matter how a woman looks originally, wearing a Pure Silk Scarf can make her look unique and more fashionable, making a great different and attracting people's eyes.
Posted by: silkzcl at October 27, 2010 11:50 PM (kke6R)
Posted by: video ipad converter at November 01, 2010 09:59 PM (cbdOf)
<a href="http://sosodirect.com" target="_blank" >wholesale fashion jewelry</a>
<a href="http://sosodirect.com/wholesale/Bracelets/Metal-Braceletsc-139" target="_blank" >wholesale stainless steel bracelets</a><br />
Posted by: wholesale fashion jewelry at April 22, 2011 08:46 PM (VPOwx)
Posted by: sac at June 21, 2011 01:45 AM (nWvzT)
Posted by: alexander wang at July 03, 2011 07:47 PM (3ppi0)
radii straight jacketWith futuristic designs and materials, each Radii Shoesexudes confidence for the ambitious forward-thinkers of the world. The Thriller is a high top lace-up sneaker with alluring urban design and detail. This style is a hot star in ourRadii Shoes Outletnow, radii 2011come and order at once!
Posted by: radii shoes at July 06, 2011 11:39 PM (Gxlj7)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.209 seconds, 406 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Rocks at December 07, 2009 12:24 PM (Q1lie)