December 13, 2009

AGW Sciencytist: You are Stupid. [krakatoa]
— Open Blog

(I bogarted the headlines with this post by accident. I'll try to get that cleaned up.)

Climate Depot's Mark Morano continues to do amazing work on the Climate Gate scandal.

He has a tremendous grasp of the relevant studies, players & data, and demonstrates his mastery of the topic and of public relations in the following debate (under the fold) he has with Professor Matt Maslin, one of the Climate specialists who has been a primary driver of AGW alarmism in Europe.

This is terrific stuff, and you should check out Morano's transcript which includes links to all the points he made.

One of the things that jumped out of me, aside from his declaration that any who disagreed with him was unintelligent, was Maslin's assertion that he'd been having this debate for 20 years.

Checking out his bio, it becomes evident that 20 years spans his entire professional life, and includes his collegiate career.

I don't doubt his assertion in the least. It is because of this that he is so determined to ignore all contrary data, and to lash out at any who threatens his viewpoint.

This is a man whose entire life is dedicated to enshrining in the public consciousness a preconcieved notion that is suddenly and quite dramtically developing significant fundamental flaws, not the least of which is the inconvenient weather outside the windows.

-Whose bio boasts that he has recieved over £22 million in grants over the past 20 years.

-Whose eventual legacy is dependent upon the institutionalization of Global policy proscripting certain behaviors in accordance with his beliefs.

This is a man who, whether he acknowledges it or not, has become wed to a belief system that is utterly dependent upon a carefully managed and massaged set of precepts. I would find it remarkable for any average person to simply step back from that faith and objectively reassess his beliefs.

Unfortunately, this isn't an average person. His arguments carry the weight of his stature as a scientist, and fulfilling that scientific role requires he do just that: Examine challenges to his theories and beliefs, and adjust them as the data demands.

That he does not now even acknowledge that there are valid scientific arguments against his dogma does not demonstrate that he is any less of a man.

It simply reveals that he is no longer a scientist. And he seems to have a lot of company in heretofore influential positions.

(video of debate under the fold)

Posted by: Open Blog at 01:34 PM | Comments (113)
Post contains 423 words, total size 3 kb.

1 You guys sure are on fire, post-wise,  for a Sunday.

Posted by: RushBabe at December 13, 2009 01:36 PM (LKkE8)

2 I like Maslin's comment that intelligent people agree that AGW is real.  Is it his assertion that people who disagree with him are less than intelligent?

Such elitism!

Posted by: David in San Diego at December 13, 2009 01:45 PM (GF+6V)

3 "Is it his assertion that people who disagree with him are less than intelligent?"

No, he's asserting they aren't people.

Posted by: Al at December 13, 2009 01:46 PM (0lyUI)

4 It's not AGW, it's Mann-made GW.

Posted by: fluffy at December 13, 2009 01:48 PM (4Kl5M)

5 Such elitism!

Posted by: David in San Diego at December 13, 2009 05:45 PM

You say elitism, I say insupportable arrogance.

Posted by: huerfano at December 13, 2009 01:49 PM (BEYNH)

6 aside from his declaration that any who disagreed with him was unintelligent

Must have attended the Charles Johnson School of Debate Technique.

sorry...i just had to

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at December 13, 2009 01:53 PM (554T5)

7 I say insupportable arrogance. Posted by: huerfano at December 13, 2009 05:49 PM (BEYNH) You say insupportable arrogance, I say insufferable religiosity.

Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at December 13, 2009 01:53 PM (JwWuz)

8 Ace: "That he does not now even acknowledge that there are valid scientific arguments against his dogma does not demonstrate that he is any less of a man."

Actually, I think it does demonstrate he's less of a man. He's throwing an intellectual tantrum equivalent to sticking his fingers in his ears and saying, "La la la la I can't and won't hear you."

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 13, 2009 01:55 PM (50S+L)

9 Stories like this contribute to my stupidity skepticism. Snow in Australia

Posted by: fluffy at December 13, 2009 01:56 PM (4Kl5M)

10 I'm all for peer-review by scientists in the global warming debate. When's it gonna start?

Posted by: 141 Driver at December 13, 2009 01:56 PM (JFNQ7)

11 Gaia be praised.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at December 13, 2009 02:03 PM (muUqs)

12 There's a you tube video of a skeptical scientist having an apparent heart attack at a debate.  Haven't been following this but he is a young guy in the video  It looks like he was shot but matt drudge says he had a heart attack.

Posted by: curious at December 13, 2009 02:05 PM (p302b)

13 I keep thinking these guys see themselves as the priests of science. Only they can understand the holy books. They will show us pictures to explain what we could not possibly understand on our own. Anyone who questions the interpretation is seen as a heretic.

Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at December 13, 2009 02:07 PM (tzcjs)

14 If you disagree with global warming then you are the equivalent of an SS officer ushering Jews into the oven.

Posted by: Alan Grayson. at December 13, 2009 02:09 PM (kXlI0)

15

Mann-made GW

Nice.

Posted by: Ella at December 13, 2009 02:12 PM (y0vbB)

16 Here is a great quote that highlights how their reaction reveals their guilt.

Experience had taught me that innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does. Innocence is a mighty shield, and the man or woman covered by it, is much more likely to answer calmly: “My life is blameless. Look into it, if you like, for you will find nothing.” That is the tone of innocence.
-WHITTAKER CHAMBERS-

Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at December 13, 2009 02:14 PM (tzcjs)

17 You say insupportable arrogance, I say insufferable religiosity.

Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at December 13, 2009 05:53 PM

Overweening pomposity.

Posted by: huerfano at December 13, 2009 02:14 PM (BEYNH)

18 It's a shame we can't get the Monty Python gang together, this would make one hell of  movie , "Monty Python and the Hockey Stick"  or "The Meaning of Mann".

Posted by: Algore ithm at December 13, 2009 02:18 PM (ympAm)

19 And my guess is that most of that grant money came from government agencies.

I'd like to see all the remediation that is going on in the Maldives to prevent flooding.  My guess is that there has been none.  But they have been building a lot of $1000.00 a night hotels.

Posted by: Bill at December 13, 2009 02:20 PM (bvDV5)

20 Mann is like a driver of an underground railroad, deniars are the racist slaveowners trying to catch him.

Posted by: Harry Reid at December 13, 2009 02:20 PM (OruF7)

21
If you disagree with global warming then you are the equivalent of an SS officer ushering Jews into the oven.

Posted by: Alan Grayson. at December 13, 2009 06:09 PM (kXlI0)





My point exactly. All deniers should be hanged at Nuremberg !11!!11!!

Posted by: Charles Johnson at December 13, 2009 02:21 PM (+FzLa)

22 Mark Morano is definitely in Copenhagen for the free prostitutes. If you're going to lose your virginity, it might as well be to a professional.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at December 13, 2009 02:22 PM (muUqs)

23 He's a geologist... had maybe 1 physics class in undergrad... versus a mechanical engineering or chemical engineering student who would have a full year of physics, a year of statics and dynamics, a year of thermodynamics, and a year of heat & mass transfer.... before senior year...

hey dipshiite... stuff it...

Posted by: phreshone at December 13, 2009 02:27 PM (wQx2m)

24 22 Mark Morano is definitely in Copenhagen for the free prostitutes. If you're going to lose your virginity, it might as well be to a professional.

Yeah, but will he lose it to the male or female kind?

Posted by: ray at December 13, 2009 02:28 PM (9+P9E)

25

see you ignorant tools, you are too stupid to understand science

killgore, watch the teeth there bigguy

anywho, you are all banned, i bid you adoooooooo, yeah, do that again

Posted by: Chuckles da Johnson at December 13, 2009 02:30 PM (+TO6b)

26 Whoops. Misattributed quote @8. Should be Open Blog (krakatoa's) and not Ace's words.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 13, 2009 02:35 PM (50S+L)

27

Just another Marxist posing as a professor. His smug reaction was probably due to getting his ass handed to him by a Yank. doesn't really matter because the Chinese and Indians will never sign onto this. Just a dog and pony show in HopenChangen.

Posted by: Blazer at December 13, 2009 02:36 PM (+FzLa)

28

Oh man, that AGW scientist could start a game. Make equivalent quotes for other characters.

Millionaire: "The entire civilized world knows that all closets are made of cedar."

Urbanite: "Orange soda is the favorite drink of all Black people. Everybody knows that."

Cat: "I keep telling you I'm superior, but you refuse to get it."

Posted by: arhooley at December 13, 2009 02:37 PM (VuFy0)

29 I'm not a doctor, but I play one on television. I'm wearing a white smock. Global Watming is just good medicine.

Posted by: TV Actor at December 13, 2009 02:43 PM (QECjC)

30 Blazer: "...doesn't really matter because the Chinese and Indians will never sign onto this. Just a dog and pony show in HopenChangen."

While The Chinese and Indians won't sabotage their economies via self-flagellation and foolishness, I'm not convinced Obama, the Van Jones mouthpiece, won't. He may not overtly put his reputation on the line, but you can bet he'll put pressure on those gullible enough to place themselves in front of the bus to do his work for him. See threats to Congress via EPA "command and control."

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 13, 2009 02:43 PM (50S+L)

31
Speaking of demented old guys with ponytails, looks like the dead-cat-bounce didn't stick and Chucky's new liberal gig ain't working out too well for him.

HaHaHaHaHaHaHa

Posted by: Blazer at December 13, 2009 02:44 PM (+FzLa)

32

#9  Snow in Australia

The same region also had summer snow in December 2004 but apparently none of that matters when you have a bandwagon to jump on and declare 2000s as the warmest decade.

When this whole edifice crumbles, and it will, the greatest harm will not have been inflicted on the economy, politics or the media but on science itself.  People will have lost confidence in pure science.

Posted by: Decaf at December 13, 2009 02:45 PM (BoFBr)

33

Stolen from a comment at WUWT..

.............................................

Whilst the greenhouse effect is generally thought of as heating earths environment, it is more accurate to describe it as preventing the environment from cooling. There is a critical difference.
If the effects of the atmosphere results in preventing the loss of heat, then surely the most accurate means to judge itÂ’s effectiveness, and any changes that occur over time, is to monitor the lowest average temperatures.

..............................................

 

does it seem to anyone but me that things have been cooling down a bit lately? If it's been cooling any at all,  this throws the whole GHG shit right out the window.

 

Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at December 13, 2009 02:48 PM (IpsCB)

34 When AGW is proven bullshit beyond a shadow of a doubt, I'd like to know how many years of prison we are going to assign to pieces of shit like this "Professor" for leading to global hysteria.  I for one would not be against a Maddof style sentencing.

Congratulations for making a complete mockery of your profession, "professor" aka Religious Zealot.

Posted by: Schlippy at December 13, 2009 02:50 PM (hYq6q)

35 People will have lost confidence in pure science. Posted by: Decaf at December 13, 2009 06:45 PM (BoFBr) I would like to point out that science doesn't need confidence, it just needs to answer the questions correctly. Genuine Peer-Reviewed Consensus Science, on the other hand . . .

Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at December 13, 2009 02:55 PM (JwWuz)

36 Why are we still writing about this? Didn't you see the AP story from yesterday? They claim that their "reporters" read all of the emails in question and that everything is just fine. There's not even the slightest hint of them changing data or making stuff up so just move along now.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 13, 2009 02:57 PM (gooy0)

37

When this whole edifice crumbles, . . .

Posted by: Decaf


---------------------
Decaf, I think our biggest order of business will be to defeat their defense: "We may have been wrong, but we had only the noblest of intentions."

Of course, their intentions were not noble, and that can be shown by their lies, but they'll still argue it to death.

At best, they were well-intentioned boobs, while we were well-intentioned smart people. We all looked at the same evidence, and they got it wrong while we got it right. So we have the right to retire them and then take over. World, who ya gonna believe?

Posted by: arhooley at December 13, 2009 03:00 PM (VuFy0)

38 no matter how long i keep a beer in the fridge it doesn't get any colder. i then move it to the freezer and voila!

Posted by: dying in myrtle beach at December 13, 2009 03:00 PM (b6BRx)

39 I'll be happy to help strangle the goose that lays those £22,000,000 eggs.


Posted by: logprof at December 13, 2009 03:05 PM (I3Udb)

40 I wuv how the pwofessor talks.  He sounds just like me. 

Posted by: Baba Wawa at December 13, 2009 03:15 PM (DZyVK)

41

I believe that confidence is the major issue because it drives the political process and public funding.  If people don't believe scientists they will not vote for politicians who fund their works. 

I am trying to clarify this to myself, whether I mean confidence or confidence trick.  The AGW has been, and is, a confidence trick.

Posted by: Decaf at December 13, 2009 03:19 PM (BoFBr)

42

The same region also had summer snow in December 2004 but apparently none of that matters when you have a bandwagon to jump on and declare 2000s as the warmest decade.

And record-setting cold in southern South America the past few years. I don't recall about record setting, but cold in South Africa too. Snowfall in Tokyo (the most recent one was in the '70s when it was used as evidence of the manmade-pollution-caused, upcoming Ice Age). And snow in the Mideast, including Iraq, just last winter IIRC. And, as we already know from NASA trying to cover it up, North America has had much colder winters for the past few years, at least, too.

Posted by: andycanuck at December 13, 2009 03:21 PM (2qU2d)

43 There's a simple way to confront scientists in the AGW camp: ask them

1) Have you personally reviewed the scientific literature used in support of the AGW hypothesis?
2) Are you willing to put your personal reputation on the line by vouching for these works and the conclusions drawn from them?

Posted by: o.u. at December 13, 2009 03:28 PM (OTnrK)

44 These Global Warming Fraud Deniers are worse than Josef Goebbels Nazi Propaganda Machine.  They lost too BTW.

Posted by: Sgt Rock at December 13, 2009 03:29 PM (2jp4I)

45 o.u., I think you've nailed it. In particular, any young meteorologist or climatologist who takes those questions to heart should experience a strong Come-to-Jesus moment -- their academic career could be trashed at birth.

Posted by: arhooley at December 13, 2009 03:39 PM (VuFy0)

46 Science as rank obedience. Reminds me of the "science" of Marxist thought.

Posted by: pat at December 13, 2009 03:42 PM (Jr9Wl)

47 IF punishment comes for these guys, I think they should each be sentenced to a separate floating sheet of ice somewhere in the arctic with a polar bear for a fellow traveler.   Oooh, too harsh?  I don't think so. 

Posted by: TheresaD at December 13, 2009 03:42 PM (iGCmo)

48 I dont suppose we can sue this idiot and get the taxpayers $22 Mil back?

Posted by: Dan F at December 13, 2009 03:45 PM (nyFP6)

49

Reminds me of the "science" of Marxist thought.
You don't believe in Soviet Mann, comrade? I would be very careful if I were you.

Posted by: andycanuck at December 13, 2009 03:48 PM (2qU2d)

50 my beer has been out of the freezer for the past 15 minutes and its getting warmer. I'll drink it quick in honor of the polar bears.

Posted by: dying in myrtle beach at December 13, 2009 03:52 PM (b6BRx)

51

These Global Warming Fraud Deniers are worse than Josef Goebbels Nazi Propaganda Machine.  They lost too BTW

Hey now! Wait just a darn minute here. Even I wouldn't have tried to foist this turd off on the public.

Posted by: Josef Goebbels at December 13, 2009 03:56 PM (P33XN)

52

Dont you just love Glowbull Worming ?


Posted by: Blazer at December 13, 2009 03:58 PM (+FzLa)

53 Arhooley, cheers!

Maybe the fraudsters could be sentenced to a very low carbon-footprint lifestyle.

Posted by: o.u. at December 13, 2009 03:59 PM (OTnrK)

54 I've heard Morano discuss this (AGW alarmism) a couple times on a local radio talk show -- he's all over it, knows his onions, and his site is a bastion of good info.

Posted by: Vile Roman at December 13, 2009 04:07 PM (sOpAl)

55 (I bogarted the headlines with this post by accident. I'll try to get that cleaned up.)

Did you mean to call them "AGW Scientologists"?

Posted by: William Teach at December 13, 2009 04:09 PM (7yTel)

56 Chucky's new liberal gig ain't working out too well for him.

Ace is getting 3X more traffic than Lunatic Goofball Fanboys.  I remember a time when those numbers were reversed.

Don't take any stock tips from CJ.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 13, 2009 04:12 PM (+3aek)

57 O.k., now this is f'n funny.


tinyurl.com/yejqwf7

Posted by: Blazer at December 13, 2009 04:17 PM (+FzLa)

58 Even more notable, Maslin is a social scientist (geography), not a natural scientist. The mathematical rigor in my finance graduate program far exceeds what a social science program will encounter, especially in post-graduate statistics (e.g. stochastic calculus).

Now I'm certainly not one to exclude discourse, but if Maslin wants to resort to a "biggest dick" contest, he's not likely to appreciate the outcome. Next we'll have social work majors telling us they're experts on global warming...

Posted by: Flyover Sam at December 13, 2009 04:18 PM (7r7wy)

59
Ace is getting 3X more traffic than Lunatic Goofball Fanboys.  I remember a time when those numbers were reversed.


Don't take any stock tips from CJ.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 13, 2009 08:12 PM (+3aek)





Per Alexa it looks like Chucky's numbers are gonna end up considerably lower than before he had his little temper tantrum and disowned the right. Seems like he may have shed the rest of his independent and conservative readers.

Doesn't look like his little gamble is gonna pay off. I guess he'll have to find a new way to make a spectacle of himself to line his pockets.

Posted by: Blazer at December 13, 2009 04:22 PM (+FzLa)

60 and to "out-social science" the social scientist Maslin, he needs to do some study on Foucault's conceptualization of discursive power systems. The Church of the AGW is entirely a product consistent with Foucault's criticism, and the utter distortion and corruption of truth an expected product.

That Maslin is inept in either Serresian category of Ju-Piter (natural science vs. social sciences, as differentiated through Kant and Enlightenment philosophy and predominates our systems of higher education), the real relevance of Maslin's discourse is that he's another fraud in a rotten system about to be destroyed by history's positive force.

Enjoy! We're clearly living through a fascinating time in history where the fraud of "science as exclusive owner of all rational thought" is now exposed and before the public.

Posted by: Flyover Sam at December 13, 2009 04:26 PM (7r7wy)

61

Scientist? The dumb piece of shit is a geographer.

To us geologists, geography isn't even a fucking science.

Posted by: TexasJew at December 13, 2009 04:28 PM (/3RuT)

62 To us geologists, geography isn't even a fucking science. Posted by: TexasJew at December 13, 2009 08:28 PM (/3RuT) Yeah, your mom's a geography, Kinky.

Posted by: Michael Mann at December 13, 2009 04:32 PM (JwWuz)

63 IF punishment comes for these guys, I think they should each be sentenced to a separate floating sheet of ice somewhere in the arctic with a polar bear for a fellow traveler


How about coating them in barbeque sauce and dropping them in the Everglades?

Posted by: mcassill at December 13, 2009 04:33 PM (S/REv)

64 ". . . the key is that every single intelligent person, every key politician in the world, listens to the key scientists, they actually look at the data."

This reminds me of a hypnotist who for many years had a very successful nightclub act in my town.  His success hinged on a single statement he made at the beginning of every show:  "The more intelligent you are, the easier it is for you to hypnotized".  Of course none of the volunteers who came up on stage wanted to be pegged as stupid, so he pretty much had his way with them.

Posted by: profligatewaste at December 13, 2009 04:36 PM (b3rrc)

65 "Snowfall in Tokyo (the most recent one was in the '70s when it was used as evidence of the manmade-pollution-caused, upcoming Ice Age)."

That can't be right.  It snows in Tokyo pretty much every year.  Maybe it was Nagasaki or some other city?

Posted by: Flubber at December 13, 2009 04:37 PM (P9y3i)

66

You know, I kinda feel a little sorry for Maslin (but only a bit).  He feels like he is arguing with the equivalent of a 9/11 truther.  From his point of view, neither logic nor reason can penetrate Morano's skull so yeah, he just gives up and calls him an uneducated idiot.  Maslin and Morano live in two completely different worlds.  Maslin lives in the ivory tower world of academe where all of his friends are sophisticated liberal do-gooder environmentalists who fret and worry about their carbon footprint.  Morano lives in the down-to-earth world along with the rest of us.

Posted by: chemjeff at December 13, 2009 04:38 PM (F+U5/)

67 Scientist? The dumb piece of shit is a geographer.

But, but the University of Bristol gave him a BSc in the traditional liberal arts field of geography, would not that alone make him a scientist?

/

Posted by: Druid at December 13, 2009 04:38 PM (Gct7d)

68 #66, do you really think he thinks we are truthers?  I think that gives this guy too much credit.  Truthers exist in the realm of conspiracy.  We have hard facts to point to (or the fact that there are no facts).

This guy is far worse than a "truther denier."  He is much more like the demons who were able to visit the West, and still insist that the Soviet Union was the real good guy.

Posted by: ParisParamus at December 13, 2009 04:42 PM (cd0d9)

69 Maslin's teaching schedule is hilarious: he works in the global warming racket in nearly every course. And then there's his publications:  a bunch of kiddie books (for the 8-12 year old reader) on natural disasters and then a slew of global warming religion books for general audiences. Look through all of his journal articles and you'll get a better understanding for why geography gets such a bad rep, especially when its teachers masquerade as geologists.

The studying of maps makes some think they're seeing underlying patterns and systems; a financial analog is that of the technical analyst aka chartist. These poor fools follow financial charts and trends (of a statistical random walk) and apply astrological methods to forecasting the future. Amusingly, that a sufficient population of deluded fools believes in such financial market behavior, a sufficient presence of its illusion materializes from time to time, only reinforcing the misguided. Unfortunately, the real analog is akin to the movie A Beautiful Mind, where the maps, charts and patterns were little more than random scraps of paper taped to the walls. I'm certain Maslin believes his scraps of paper and is convinced his maps are the Oracle's entrails, warning of the pending planetary incineration.

But for the rest of us, we only see a confused and deranged fool. God help those in academia who have been misled and have anchored their careers to this myth, as some of us will show no mercy as the system is dismantled.

Posted by: Flyover Sam at December 13, 2009 04:43 PM (7r7wy)

70 O/T:  The HBO special Terror in Mumbai is on CNN tonight.  My God how I've come to detest that religion...about as much as I hate the AGW cult. 

Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at December 13, 2009 04:44 PM (DPM1U)

71

#66, do you really think he thinks we are truthers? 

No, but I think he believes we are the mental equivalent - impervious to "reason" (i.e. his established science).

Posted by: chemjeff at December 13, 2009 04:51 PM (F+U5/)

72 First thing I notice about Maslin's CV is that he seems to have a lot of financial interests tied to carbon regulation.


Posted by: mrkwong at December 13, 2009 04:55 PM (G8Eo0)

73 The memory is fuzzy, but in Church doesn't the Priest or Pastor say something like, "This is the Word of the Lord" and the rest respond in some proper fashion? These AGW "Scientists" seem to expect such a scenario when they open their yaps. If you've ever heard a lecture from a scientist who does good work and also happens to have some humility (they go hand-in-hand, actually), you are certain to have felt a very different vibe.

Posted by: eman at December 13, 2009 04:55 PM (atVcZ)

74

72 First thing I notice about Maslin's CV is that he seems to have a lot of financial interests tied to carbon regulation.

Me too.  This is the dirty little secret of academic science in general.  Nobody looks over their shoulder so they do whatever they want, including intentionally creating conflicts of interest.

Posted by: chemjeff at December 13, 2009 04:58 PM (F+U5/)

75 What I find interesting is that these AGW Sciencytists, who swear that the "Science is settled" and we common people should just have blind faith in the cult of AGW, are the first people who declare religious folks who have faith in God to be "gullible rubes."

Posted by: Xoxotl at December 13, 2009 05:01 PM (j88uA)

76 Actually, I really liked the misspelling of "Scientist" in the post title.  We need another word for what these morons call "science".  And following the left-wing paradigm for renaming "woman" to "womyn", I nominate "Scyence" and "Scyentyst" as the new words for the pagan rituals these fools subscribe to.

Qwinn

Posted by: Qwinn at December 13, 2009 05:05 PM (SxA2Q)

77

I took a sophomore geography course as part of my engineering curriculum.  It satsified part of the requirements to take some NON-TECHNICAL electives.

Posted by: Pelayo at December 13, 2009 05:05 PM (8NGHm)

78 Dammit.  I post then and then I go to the next thread down by Malor.  D'oh!

Posted by: Xoxotl at December 13, 2009 05:05 PM (j88uA)

79 We need another word for what these morons call "science".

I think the word you're looking for is "bullshit"

Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 13, 2009 05:15 PM (+3aek)

Posted by: JavaJoe at December 13, 2009 05:15 PM (Am6n/)

81

I wuv how the pwofessor talks.  He sounds just like me. 
Posted by: Baba Wawa at December 13, 2009 07:15 PM (DZyVK)

Not so fast, Baba.

http://tinyurl.com/corja6

Posted by: huerfano at December 13, 2009 05:18 PM (BEYNH)

82 JavaJoe,

Got two attacks (one a Trojan) when hitting your link.

Posted by: Druid at December 13, 2009 05:19 PM (Gct7d)

83

I'm proud to be a dumbass moron corrected on a previous thread.

It looks like Editor & Publisher is truly dead:

Editor & Publisher closing after 108 years

NEW YORK (AP) - The journalism trade journal Editor & Publisher is shutting down after 108 years of publication.
----------

Dated 12/10/09

I shed no tears for thee.

Posted by: Tinian at December 13, 2009 05:20 PM (7+pP9)

84 OT: The Flaming Blago Skull ain't yet extinguished. http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/1935445,CST-NWS-BLAGO13.article

Posted by: eman at December 13, 2009 05:23 PM (atVcZ)

85 .

Posted by: hinky at December 13, 2009 05:26 PM (RVR48)

86 OT

It has been almost a year since we all watched videos of Obama's private army being trained.  How long does it take to train an army of loyal murderers and theives?  Has there been any more news or videos of these training camps?  Does anyone seriously think that the implementation of this army has been suspended?

Obama appears ready to send a great portion of our remaining "real" troops overseas, to his Ummah where the rest of our troops are being kept, and very soon.  Yeah, I said it: BEING KEPT.  Sorry to all the military families, but Obama doesn't want them coming home, ever, for many reasons.

Better pray for Christ's return before this Muslim Mao-wannabe attempts to beat the "great philosopher's" mass-murder record.

http://tinyurl.com/y8z5acc

Obama is praying too.  To the same P.O.S. moon-god that the rest of his Ummah is praying to.

Posted by: Taqiyyotomist at December 13, 2009 05:35 PM (ltfED)

87 "Science as rank obedience. Reminds me of the "science" of Marxist thought." Marx at least claimed to believe in the scientific method. These people have no more connection to science than medieval theologians debating how many angels could dance on the head of a pin.

Posted by: Dave J. at December 13, 2009 05:37 PM (DCQ0q)

88 Whatever this Maslin's pedigree is (I'm not in a position to judge), one could certainly be compromised for a lot less than he got to be an AGW advocate - $40 million or so. 

What I find interesting is the debate that's going on among the physicists.  The national group which represents physicists issued a position paper in 2007 supporting AGW.  Now a number of them, many of whom are eminent, have requested that this position paper be reviewed and put on ice for the time being.  (Unfortunately, the guy who was appointed to study it has gotten millions in AGW grants.)  So some really high IQ scientists are questioning AGW.  Are they stupid, too?

Posted by: jane at December 13, 2009 05:40 PM (XYR/W)

89

AGW "scientists" rank with Trofim Lysenko.

Posted by: Tinian at December 13, 2009 05:41 PM (7+pP9)

90 Back off man: we're scientists!

Posted by: Dr. Peter Venkman at December 13, 2009 05:44 PM (DCQ0q)

91 And cleanup is requested on aisle no 86.

Posted by: Tinian at December 13, 2009 05:44 PM (7+pP9)

92

Professor Maslin is a lesbian, right? I mean, that's neither here nor there, it's just sort of interesting.

Posted by: Wm T Sherman at December 13, 2009 05:46 PM (tm15w)

93 @91 Winston Zeddemore: Ray, when someone asks you if you're a god, you say "YES"!

Posted by: Al at December 13, 2009 05:46 PM (0lyUI)

94 93/WmTSherman: If someone were to point out that maps & charts instructor Maslin had the haircut of a lesbian, that could be construed as non-scientific discourse and deemed grounds for exclusion. But of course, nobody here would ever make such claims. That's the kind of non-scientific nonsense that goes on over at the lefty blogs.

Posted by: Flyover Sam at December 13, 2009 05:48 PM (7r7wy)

95 "Ace is getting 3X more traffic than Lunatic Goofball Fanboys.  I remember a time when those numbers were reversed.'

Just stay out of that patterico-goldberg-RSM crap.  That melee is toxic.

Posted by: cassandra in MT at December 13, 2009 05:51 PM (pdApu)

96

Funny how these AGW hounds seem to tout how their work goes back twenty years.  [Furrowing my brow while counting my fingers--because I'm so stupid, that's the only way I can count]  Hmm, twenty years ago was 1989.  What was going on then?  A wall collapsing?  Marxism in sudden and total defeat? 

Maybe that's why they're all twenty-year veterans: they finally figured out that there was no future in red, so they had to don another color, stat.  Green it is! 

 

Posted by: Houstonian at December 13, 2009 05:55 PM (xPDhn)

Posted by: sig at December 13, 2009 05:58 PM (2i+Vz)

98

A simple search engine doesn't show much on this Professor Maslin, so I cannot tell what sort of geographer he purports to be. Please be aware, engineers, that there are several fields that have "geography" in their title. Political and "human" geographers do a kind of statistical survey work, and probably do belong over in that much-despised elective category.

But physical geography is hard science. It includes soil science, the geology of land formation, and meteorology. Now, those studies can be misapplied or done poorly--like engineering--but they are scientific studies, not map-gazing. 

Engineers always seem to be particularly touchy about whether other professions are "science" or not. Why? You may well wonder.

 

Posted by: comatus at December 13, 2009 06:04 PM (/VEEI)

99

If someone were to point out that maps & charts instructor Maslin had the haircut of a lesbian, that could be construed as non-scientific discourse and deemed grounds for exclusion. But of course, nobody here would ever make such claims. That's the kind of non-scientific nonsense that goes on over at the lefty blogs.

Posted by: Flyover Sam at December 13, 2009 09:48 PM (7r7wy)

Results for a "Matt Maslin" Google Image Search (GIS).

I'd let Maslin map my chart anyday.

Posted by: Tinian at December 13, 2009 06:07 PM (7+pP9)

100

Geography's a science? Who knew?

 

 

Posted by: Godless Infidel at December 13, 2009 06:10 PM (tsI0t)

101 The best part about the APS business (revisiting their 2007 GW pronouncement) is that the person who is going to review their pronouncement is the guy that wrote it, who is responsible for the theory it espouses, and who has $2 million/year in research funds absolutely dependent on it being true. No possible conflict of interest there, nosiree! David

Posted by: LateNightWithDavid at December 13, 2009 06:10 PM (V/I0F)

102 95  93/WmTSherman: If someone were to point out that maps & charts instructor Maslin had the haircut of a lesbian, that could be construed as non-scientific discourse and deemed grounds for exclusion. But of course, nobody here would ever make such claims. That's the kind of non-scientific nonsense that goes on over at the lefty blogs.

Posted by: Flyover Sam at December 13, 2009 09:48 PM (7r7wy)

Well yeah, of course. As I noted, it was just a casual aside. Like noticing his tone of nasal mewling condescension, it's just a matter of personal style, not any sort of scientific issue. Give a guy a break, will you?

 I wasn't expressing skepticism at his argument that AGW is proven by the alleged existence of a flying wedge of scientists marching in consensus somewhere out there, nor the arguments that it's proven because he is smarter than his critics and has been arguing for a certain number of years. And I certainly had no intention of impugning his relevant expertise or technical training. No, I didn't do any of that until right now.

 

 

Posted by: Wm T Sherman at December 13, 2009 06:16 PM (tm15w)

103 Hard to believe I missed this Nov 2009 CATO Institute reference to Foucault:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/yb8jjpv

Though the CATO post is more specific to the left's link to Foucault's criticism in its application of governmentality to the health care takeover, it's equally relevant in the capitalism takeover aka AGW treaties, scientific discourse and related applications of discursive power.

That the post-modern criticism of Foucault, Deleuze, Zizek, Lacan, etc. (many of which are Marx-influenced) links most specifically to the practices of the globalist Left is most amusing.

Posted by: Flyover Sam at December 13, 2009 06:29 PM (7r7wy)

104 See, there you deniers go again.  If you hadn't been so insistant on reproducing results we coulda all been driving around in COLD FUSION powered cars.  Cold fusion: we're talking platinum wires in sugar water and presto! you gotst electricity.  But no, we had to show our work and now what do we have?  Nothing.

Posted by: Marionnette de Chaussette at December 13, 2009 06:56 PM (PBTsv)

105

Have you heard of Maurice Strong? He's the ultimate snake oil salesman and a big pusher for glowbull worming.

 While in Canada,he recommended that the then Liberal government,purchase 3 oil companies for double their value.He received 900k for helping to nationalize the oil industry. The end result,over time,was a complete disaster.

 The oil for food UN scam was abetted by Mr. Maurice. He had 2 Liberal Prime ministers in on the take. After investigation, all were  exonerated, by Liberal appointed ethics commissioners.

 Now, Mr. Strong is a big negotiator for the UN. I can smell his dealings from here. This assssshole should be doing time with Bernie Maddow.

Posted by: chicocano at December 13, 2009 07:09 PM (2n5cq)

106 j.Harlen Bretz.  Geologist/Geographer.  Proved the theory of massive Ice age (global warming) floods that created the channeled scablands of Eastern Washington.  Mapped them to the point when they came out w/ the first sattellite map in 1976, his penciled maps were nearly identical.

Excoriated by his contemporaries, (circa 1930) Dogmatic in his research. 

A good scientist is one who understands his discipline and refuses to be cowed by the "consensus". 

A read of his biography may as well be playing out now.  Settled science. Lone guy sayin' "not so! I got proof!" " ---oh, we'll take that nutcase down"



Posted by: Derak at December 13, 2009 07:12 PM (hh9eK)

107 EPA to get Glock G-19s

Sounds like they already have them for their CID Federal Agents.  Buying more of the same isn't particularly noteworthy.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 13, 2009 07:57 PM (BS1Cv)

108 Toronto Star covers Mcintyre

http://tinyurl.com/y98rhrp

...as does Maclean's:

http://tinyurl.com/ydvh72b

More traction for the growing scandal

Posted by: Sox Pupit at December 13, 2009 08:27 PM (rRO4e)

109 I thought "Scientician" was the accepted (Simpsons) name for these people.

Posted by: Brett_McS at December 13, 2009 09:39 PM (eAKU3)

110 I think in true TimeCube fashion, the headline should read, "You are educated stupid."

Posted by: BeckoningChasm at December 13, 2009 09:39 PM (eNxMU)

111 @108
    After re-reading the link your right it's not noteworthy. I just had visions of EPA agents crashing in someone front door to arrest someone for burning firewood. If and when the ban to burn wood is ever started.

Posted by: sig at December 14, 2009 04:35 AM (2i+Vz)

112

“There is far more independent due diligence on the smallest prospectus offering securities to the public than on a Nature article that might end up having a tremendous impact on policy.”

.. and here underlies the real problem with "Climate Science" as shown by the CRU e-mails.


Posted by: Neo at December 14, 2009 04:39 AM (tE8FB)

113 Interestingly enough, Professor Matlin, with his "5000 scientists agree" comment, betrays that he has much in common with methodology employed by the Climategate poli-scientists... if the actual numbers don't support what you're trying to say, just "homogenize" the numbers a bit until they do.

Posted by: Rob at December 15, 2009 12:13 AM (TzEyH)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
132kb generated in CPU 0.0936, elapsed 0.3285 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3028 seconds, 241 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.