November 24, 2009
— Dave in Texas First statement, "no one is forced to go on the public option. If someone can tell me how they are forced to go on the public option, no one, it's a choice they would have". (video at the link)
A constituent gladly explains precisely how by asking the following questions:
1) Do you agree with Nancy Pelosi that itÂ’s fair to throw the uninsured in jail? and2) If the public option is just an option and no one is forced to take it, why are people going to be thrown in jail if they donÂ’t?
Whooaaa, that's quite a leap. Car insurance... blah blah.. the same lame answer (not the least of which, it isn't "forced to buy car insurance, it's a requirement to show proof of financial responsibility for damages you cause to someone else as a result of your negligence).
This particular "blue dog" doesn't seem terribly bothered with the concept of a public option. He seems rather in favor of it.
Doesn't seem too worked up about that whole jail thing either.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
04:06 PM
| Comments (81)
Post contains 190 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: ahem at November 24, 2009 04:10 PM (Ldu+P)
Posted by: Lone Marauder at November 24, 2009 04:11 PM (p1iaB)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 24, 2009 04:13 PM (whG5F)
Posted by: Car Jacker at November 24, 2009 04:16 PM (whG5F)
What he means is no one with private health insurance is going to be forced to switch to the public option. Obviously.
Posted by: seattle slough at November 24, 2009 04:25 PM (JRGA6)
Second, how long before Congress does sex to the insurance companies again with some sort of windfall tax on all the new revenues they are gaining from the new pool of insurance purchasers? I say before the ink is dry on the initial legislation.
Third, right now the company penalty imposed by the health care committee IRS is actually cheaper than employers providing insurance. How long before that number gets much closer to 50/50 or even that it would be cheaper for companies to provide it, but the administration headaches of all the new bureaucracy will still be plenty of motivation to roll all their employees into the public plan? So, the government raises taxes and still creates more dependents of the nanny state. Win/win.
Posted by: The Hammer at November 24, 2009 04:26 PM (YBTwf)
Posted by: rplat at November 24, 2009 04:28 PM (G1ArL)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 24, 2009 04:34 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 24, 2009 04:35 PM (eNxMU)
Posted by: TonyRezko at November 24, 2009 04:37 PM (+jw61)
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at November 24, 2009 04:38 PM (H7Rlw)
Here's the thing though. As soon as the insurance company changes your policy at all, from what I understand, you are then somehow forced to the public option. So eventually, everyone, even those with great company policies, will end up on the public option. Because policies change all the time.
Plus... it will be cheaper for companies to drop insurance and pay the fines rather than pay for private insurance.
Even if they do stay with private policies... see above. Everyone will eventually fed into the giant meat grinder that is Obamacare.
So get sick sooner rather than later.
Posted by: shibumi at November 24, 2009 04:39 PM (OKZrE)
Posted by: Zombie Ted Kennedy at November 24, 2009 04:40 PM (cvvNY)
Posted by: nickless at November 24, 2009 04:41 PM (MMC8r)
Sort of like the Hillary Dems who were supposed to go rogue on the party. What was that tag they were given? I've forgotten.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at November 24, 2009 04:44 PM (554T5)
Sort of like the Hillary Dems who were supposed to go rogue on the party. What was that tag they were given? I've forgotten.
Angry lesbian feminists.
Posted by: Entropy at November 24, 2009 04:46 PM (cok/k)
Posted by: The American Taxpayer at November 24, 2009 04:46 PM (UNDmA)
Posted by: seattle slough at November 24, 2009 08:25 PM (JRGA6)
Absolutely not.
Posted by: Robert Byrd at November 24, 2009 04:51 PM (EL+OC)
I miss the old days when Lace Wigs were here.
Not like CD Keys. They just don't inspire the same confidence...
Posted by: shibumi at November 24, 2009 04:51 PM (OKZrE)
Lipinski is my congressman. He isn't a blue dog. He's a tool of the Illinois Democratic/Cook County organization. I've never heard anyone around here (Cook County) refer to him as a blue dog. No one. Other names are used: scumbag, asshole, jerkoff, etc.
Posted by: Roughcoat at November 24, 2009 04:52 PM (xL8tW)
Okay, here's anotherr one for you. The Democrats' plan makes it illegal to discriminate against people with pre-existing conditions.
So I start the world's crappiest insurance company that charges way to much for next to no covereage at all, but priced cheaper than the other companies (because I don't really cover much at all). How many customers do I get?
About 300 million, because whenever one of my customers gets sick they switch over to a real plan, having not paid those companies a prior dime.
I get rich, all the real insurance companies go bankrupt, and everyrone is dumped onto the public plan.
Posted by: George Turner at November 24, 2009 04:52 PM (mINv3)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 24, 2009 04:52 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: billypaintbrush at November 24, 2009 04:53 PM (AJkuE)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 24, 2009 04:53 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: the real joe at November 24, 2009 04:54 PM (AuKbo)
When they win the super majority next year the first thing they need to do is arrest key leftists in the MSM (NYT. MSNBC, CNN, CEO of GS, GE, AIG) and try them immediately for sedition and treason. Period.
Posted by: Barbarian at November 24, 2009 04:58 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: CDR M at November 24, 2009 04:59 PM (cvmTR)
Posted by: rawmuse at November 24, 2009 05:04 PM (7dSSk)
Posted by: GarandFan at November 24, 2009 05:05 PM (ZQBnQ)
Posted by: rawmuse at November 24, 2009 05:07 PM (7dSSk)
Of course, after the government runs all the health care insurance companies out of business, the tune will be "different". Won't it?
And don't give me the bullshit that this isn't true. Your own Obamassiah has said that it will take 10-20 years to accomplish this.
Go drink your Kool Aid.
Posted by: GarandFan at November 24, 2009 05:08 PM (ZQBnQ)
Posted by: MrCaniac at November 24, 2009 05:08 PM (Vol3D)
O/T:
I'm going to bed so here's my contribution, an obituary worth reading:
Soldier Who Led Last Bayonet Charge Dies
Retired Army Col. Lewis L. Millett, who received the Medal of Honor during the Korean War for leading what reportedly was the last major American bayonet charge, died Nov 14.
Millett, 88, died in Loma Linda, Calif., after serving for more than 15 years as the honorary colonel of the 27th Infantry Regiment Association.
Millet received the Medal of Honor for his actions Feb. 7, 1951. He led the 25th Infantry DivisionÂ’s Company E, 27th Infantry, in a bayonet charge up Hill 180 near Soam-Ni, Korea. A captain at the time, Millet was leading his company in an attack against a strongly held position when he noticed that a platoon was pinned down by small-arms, automatic, and antitank fire.
Millett placed himself at the head of two other platoons, ordered fixed bayonets, and led an assault up the fire-swept hill. In the fierce charge, Millett bayoneted two enemy soldiers and continued on, throwing grenades, clubbing and bayoneting the enemy, while urging his men forward by shouting encouragement, according to his Medal of Honor citation.
"Despite vicious opposing fire, the whirlwind hand-to-hand assault carried to the crest of the hill," the citation states. "His dauntless leadership and personal courage so inspired his men that they stormed into the hostile position and used their bayonets with such lethal effect that the enemy fled in wild disorder."
Millett was wounded by grenade fragments during the attack, but he refused evacuation until the objective was firmly secured. He recovered, and attended Ranger School after the war.
In the 1960s, he ran the 101st Airborne Division Recondo School for reconnaissance and commando training at Fort Campbell, Ky. He then served in a number of special operations advisory assignments in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War. He founded the Royal Thai Army Ranger School with help of the 46th Special Forces Company. This unit reportedly is the only one in the U.S. Army to simultaneously be designated as both Ranger and Special Forces.
Millet retired from the Army in 1973.
---------------
There's more at the linked article
And on top of all of that, he had a mustache that John Bolton would die for.
Posted by: Tinian at November 24, 2009 05:09 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Mike H at November 24, 2009 05:13 PM (cvvNY)
Posted by: rawmuse at November 24, 2009 05:14 PM (7dSSk)
Posted by: steevy at November 24, 2009 05:26 PM (5bidN)
I can't help but think Colonel Millet would be brought up on charges for that in the current political climate.
Posted by: Dang Straights at November 24, 2009 05:26 PM (djkiW)
Posted by: steevy at November 24, 2009 05:28 PM (5bidN)
College is all of his experience. College and more college, then more college then teaching at college. Northwest, Stanford and Duke.
Daddy was Congresssman.
Elitist ass hat bitch.
And Roman Catholic Pro-Abortion.
This shit doesn't take a fucking genius to figure out.
Posted by: gus at November 24, 2009 05:33 PM (MaqIC)
Lipinski is my congressman. He isn't a blue dog. He's a tool of the Illinois Democratic/Cook County organization. I've never heard anyone around here (Cook County) refer to him as a blue dog. No one
Ummm.... yeah.
Seriously people call him a blue dog?
Who? I've never heard such a thing.
People from Idaho?
This ain't downstate.... it's Chicago. He's a machine pol.
Posted by: Entropy at November 24, 2009 05:37 PM (cok/k)
This entire thing is unconstitutional, and they maneuver us into debating a fine. How about the dems explain to me how this whole thing jibes with the Constitution of the United States of America?
And the GOP leadership?
Whores bitching about the price.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at November 24, 2009 05:39 PM (O/ezx)
I know the Brits still fix bayonets because a Brit was just decorated for sticking a Taliban.
Really? Britain still decorates soldiers who do that?
In Canada, they reprimand and investigate soldiers who shoot the enemy.
In the US, apparently not to be outdone, we outright courtmarshall ones who punch the enemy.
Posted by: Entropy at November 24, 2009 05:40 PM (cok/k)
Posted by: les grossman at November 24, 2009 05:40 PM (Vc/xe)
Posted by: gus at November 24, 2009 05:42 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: shoey at November 24, 2009 05:47 PM (RxUMK)
Posted by: the real joe at November 24, 2009 05:49 PM (AuKbo)
Posted by: shoey at November 24, 2009 05:49 PM (RxUMK)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 24, 2009 05:58 PM (whG5F)
"What he means is no one with private health insurance is going to be forced to switch to the public option. Obviously."
Is there a fucktard left on the planet, other than Seattle Slough, who doesn't understand that small companies may find themselves incentivized to drop their own private plans, pay a fine, and let their employees be forced to switch to the public option?
Or that a person who loses his job will no longer be able to tough it out w/o any coverage until he gets a new job, and be forced to join the public plan?
Posted by: effinayright at November 24, 2009 06:04 PM (7M8Py)
Posted by: jeff at November 24, 2009 06:08 PM (Sx9Qk)
Posted by: rplat at November 24, 2009 08:28 PM (G1ArL)
Sir, I deeply resent that slur and demand that you retract it.
Posted by: One-cell organism (D-CA) at November 24, 2009 06:10 PM (ItSLQ)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 24, 2009 06:11 PM (r1h5M)
What is that strange word you use? Are you suggesting that people will behave differently if they are placed in different circumstances? That's crazy talk.
Posted by: seattle sloth at November 24, 2009 06:12 PM (ItSLQ)
And thanks to the U of I and the People's Republic of Urbana even those numbers are shrinking.
Posted by: Land of Leakin at November 24, 2009 06:13 PM (nmEtX)
What? I don't see the problem?
Posted by: compact fluorescent light bulb at November 24, 2009 06:14 PM (ItSLQ)
Anyone still think this is just politics as usual?
Cuz it ain't.
When this passes, and it most likely will, will the majority of Americans rightfully consider this an Intolerable Act, or will we yet again shrug, and shuffle on as usual?
Posted by: OneEyedJack at November 24, 2009 06:38 PM (Poe30)
Lipinski is my congressman, and he is not nor has he ever been a blue dog. With any controversial bill his staff states that he is still considering the bill until he votes the party line, of course.
He took his father's seat when his father retired early and the only reason he gets elected is because the district is so gerrymandered that the town he's from is completely out-represented by the heavily democratic areas to the East.
Posted by: Lip Service at November 24, 2009 06:48 PM (BBHWe)
Posted by: eman at November 24, 2009 06:49 PM (R484t)
Posted by: Darth Randall at November 24, 2009 07:01 PM (98AOY)
A short story with a point. I attended an April 15 Tea Party on the capital lawn in Madison, WI. I enjoyed listening to the speakers, reading the signs and T-shirts, listening to the roar of the rather large crowd, and the amiable atmosphere. When it was over, everyone picked up every single scrap of litter, put it in bags they came with, and left in an orderly fashion, crossing only with the lights and at the corners. That entire day not one arrest was made, even though the Capital Police were out in force, not suprising considering the history of protests at the Capital.
During the 75 minute drive home, I turned to my buddy and said, "That was a waste of a perfectly good afternoon." He seemed baffled and said "huh?" So I laid it out for him, as I saw it. (Here I'm gonna stop using quotes, as it was a rather long conversation, so I'll paraphrase best as I can recall).
Remember the civil rights protests of the early 60's? How did they usually end? With fire hoses and beatings and jail houses overflowing with protesters. The reward was the Civil Rights Act of '64, and a few laws, and the enactment of LBJ's Great Society spending binge. Fear of civil unrest made that happen.
Remember the race riots of 67 and 68? Inner cities all across America up in flames. And the result? More civil rights laws, neighborhoods rebuilt with public money, and more money dedicated to more programs. Fear of civil unrest made that happen.
Then there were the anti-war protests, and the riot in Chicago at the DNC convention, and the Weather Underground, and the SLA, etc., culminating in the end of the Viet Nam war.
So when the Left makes demands of society, the powers that be listen, and often capitulate. FEAR OF CIVIL UNREST MAKES THAT HAPPEN.
So I told my buddy that nothing would come of the Tea Party because Power doesn't fear us. That was more than 6 months ago. We've had Tea Parties galore, Town Hall meetings, written our congressmen and senators, had near ONE MILLION people in DC on 9/12, and the agenda marches forward. Each time we tell ourselves, this time they will listen to us. This time they will understand. And "they" do. They understand that we will show up, make some noise, and politely and respectfully disappear from whence we came.
Sure, maybe a few are a little fearful of losing their jobs, but that's it. The agenda moves forward.
Because they don't fear us.
Posted by: OneEyedJack at November 24, 2009 07:15 PM (Poe30)
Posted by: donabernathy at November 24, 2009 11:45 PM (k3zBV)
Posted by: izoneguy at November 25, 2009 07:01 AM (4B2Bd)
Posted by: ed at November 25, 2009 09:45 AM (Urhve)
Posted by: saintsfan at November 25, 2009 10:16 AM (W1bj8)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2574 seconds, 209 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: rawmuse at November 24, 2009 04:09 PM (7dSSk)