November 26, 2009
— Open Blog UPDATE5[PA] Drudge picks up the Aussie MP resignations story
UPDATE3[PA] Aussie politics in turmoil over Liberal party resignations over their version of Cap/Trade. Some of the liberals broke ranks and resigned over it(i.e. they thought it was a crap bill) PART 1(the resignations), PART 2(Turnbull doubles down on stupid).
One can't help but wonder if this wave of protest resignations wasn't influenced in some small way by the CRU revelations even if that wasn't explicitly stated. Smart politicians thinking some years down the road, might see being on the wrong side of this as a career killer, and being on the right side as a way to catapult careers to the top. Imprudent politicians, like Turnbull, double down on stupid risking it all on one throw of a die that might not be loaded quite they way they though thought it was loaded. Time will tell.
UPDATE2[PA] Some significant "fishiness" has been found in the code.
UPDATE1. Explanation released. Adjustments were made to compensate for changes in the physical locations of sensing stations. Strangely (no, not really), they only agreed to release one example of the specific methodology & data used to determine the direction & magnitude of the changes. I'm seeing a pattern here, and it's not so much a pattern of climate as of obsfucation.
Follow the above link for a full treatment on the update. Investigate Magazine does a nice job explaining why the single example given is questionable, albeit NIWA's best hope of making the issue go away. I imagine the vast majority of other changes are of even more dubious quality.
ALSO, if you are looking for a quick, easy-to-read summarization of the CRU scandal to pass along to friends & family with short attention spans, Lon @ Commission Impossible has a nice primer: Men Behaving Badly.
-----
On the heels of the unfolding CRU scandal, Investigate Magazine reports that a similar one is unfolding in New Zealand.
It is a familiar story.
New Zealand's Climate advisory panel - The National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA) - produced a graph showing a dramatic 20th century warming trend. The author of the graph, one Dr. Salinger, created the his version of the infamous "Hockey Stick" in the 80's while he worked at none other than the CRU at University of East Anglia.
To produce the graph, he used surface station data collected since the 1850's. The graph continued to be updated through 2008. For many years, he ignored requests to release the data set he used to populate his plot points.
Recently the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition took matters into their own hands, collected the surface station data, and produced their own graph. The results they reported bear little resemblance to Dr. Salinger's:

While Salinger's graph demonstrated a warming of of .92 degrees celsius per century, the raw data indicated otherwise:
Straight away you can see there’s no slope—either up or down. The temperatures are remarkably constant way back to the 1850s. Of course, the temperature still varies from year to year, but the trend stays level—statistically insignificant at 0.06°C per century since 1850. Putting these two graphs side by side, you can see huge differences. What is going on?
This group was able to get Salinger's data set from one of his colleagues, and found drastic changes made to the raw data to produce an exaggerated temperature increase by manipulating early data down (in one case by as much as a whopping 1.3 degrees celsius ) and manipulating successive measurements upwards.
About half the adjustments actually created a warming trend where none existed; the other half greatly exaggerated existing warming. All the adjustments increased or even created a warming trend, with only one (Dunedin) going the other way and slightly reducing the original trend.The shocking truth is that the oldest readings have been cranked way down and later readings artificially lifted to give a false impression of warming, as documented below. There is nothing in the station histories to warrant these adjustments and to date Dr Salinger and NIWA have not revealed why they did this.
Demands for an explanation by Investigate Magazine resulted in another familiar dance:
NIWA's David Wratt has told Investigate magazine this afternoon his organization denies faking temperature data and he claims NIWA has a good explanation for adjusting the temperature data upward. Wratt says NIWA is drafting a media response for release later this afternoon which will explain why they altered the raw data."Do you agree it might look bad in the wake of the CRU scandal?"
"No, no," replied Wratt before hitting out at the Climate Science Coalition and accusing them of "misleading" people about the temperature adjustments.
BTW, the media response they were working on did not, in fact, get released today. That's ok. I've got plenty of popcorn left.
H/T WUWT.
All of this, of course, means the Zombie threat level is reduced to a medium taupe, as a non-warming planet limits the spread of brain-eating amoeba.
Someone Asked for Popcorn [ace]:
Posted by: Open Blog at
06:32 AM
| Comments (295)
Post contains 877 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Admiral J. Random Dude IV, IE,PS,TMI at November 25, 2009 08:09 PM (anmms)
Posted by: Jean at November 25, 2009 08:10 PM (xCBQ4)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 25, 2009 08:10 PM (vKdhq)
More precisely, from about 1950 on it looks to be about the same graph. It's just heavily revised downwards before that, which creates the entire effect.
Posted by: Sayyid at November 25, 2009 08:11 PM (8rbBG)
Posted by: Jean at November 25, 2009 08:12 PM (xCBQ4)
Posted by: kurtilator at November 25, 2009 08:13 PM (juh4Z)
Posted by: BIG ROB at November 25, 2009 08:14 PM (f6qHG)
Here is my slightly drunk, middle of the night hypothesis, complete with some big science words:
1 CO2 levels are rising
2. Some tree rings patterns are showing growth patterns with which dendrochronology traditionally associates with increases in temperature or extended growing season.
3. Temperatures are not rising
4. Is it possible that the tree ring growth patterns are directly effected by the rise in CO2 as it is essentially "tree food"
5. If the tree ring proxy data is removed due to potential multicollinearity do the BE-10 ice cores show the same divergence with respect to today's more accurate measurement techniques?
6. If the answer to #5 is no, did the sun short Soros?
Posted by: Jean at November 25, 2009 08:17 PM (xCBQ4)
Posted by: Tar Minyatur III at November 25, 2009 08:18 PM (bFy4C)
Posted by: The Undisputed Consensus at November 25, 2009 08:19 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: bill y clinton at November 25, 2009 08:22 PM (pU4D7)
Posted by: Jean at November 25, 2009 08:23 PM (xCBQ4)
Posted by: CDR M at November 25, 2009 08:24 PM (cvmTR)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 25, 2009 08:27 PM (vKdhq)
Posted by: Junkman at November 25, 2009 08:29 PM (2h3VW)
Why would anybody "adjust" temperature data? It could be adjusted if the researcher had a calculation that told him that radiant heat was affecting the air temperature readings. However, that would take another data set in order to recalculate the temperature. Because a scientist today would not know if the themometer 100 years ago was shielded from radiant heat, there would be no justification to change the reading. Instead of trying to adjust the value from an unshielded thermometer, it should be tossed. And another thing, the temperature recorded form an unshielded thermometer, thermister, or anything that measures temperature would be adjused DOWNWARD, DAMMIT!!!!
All this sounds like a scam.
Posted by: Pelayo at November 25, 2009 08:30 PM (wwQxi)
Don't forget, all the while as this was unfolding The Precedent was yapping about global warming with India. These people have no scruples, no brains, and are totally impervious to logic. Only jail will stop them.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 25, 2009 08:30 PM (A46hP)
Posted by: CDR M at November 25, 2009 08:32 PM (cvmTR)
I have a strong feeling the court would argue you don't have standing.
But what is teh next step? There have been dribs and drabs coming out for years that AGW was, at best, not really strongly supported by the actual evidence. Now we see that the the supposed consensus of a multitude of scientists was in fact a handful of ideologues working together massaging the data and trying to censor their opponents.
Is this getting out to the public? Do they realize the scope of what we now know? Are they finally willing to throw out politicians that promise to save them from AGW by taxing someone else into the poorhouse?
Posted by: 18-1 at November 25, 2009 08:36 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 25, 2009 08:36 PM (vKdhq)
Posted by: CDR M at November 25, 2009 08:36 PM (cvmTR)
I'm kinda ashamed of this , but Jones gave me a handy for $5 in 2003 .
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 26, 2009 12:36 AM (vKdhq)
Oh, I'm sure you had to listen to a 5 min carbon handjob lecture first!
Posted by: CDR M at November 25, 2009 08:37 PM (cvmTR)
Posted by: CDR M at November 26, 2009 12:32 AM (cvmTR)
Actually, Enron was the first important proponent of Cap n' Tax. Odd how that doesn't get much mention.
Posted by: 18-1 at November 25, 2009 08:37 PM (bgcml)
I'm sure the State Media would cover that in as much detail as they did the ACORN videos...
Posted by: 18-1 at November 25, 2009 08:38 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: N. Pelosi at November 25, 2009 08:39 PM (tzZFG)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 25, 2009 08:40 PM (vKdhq)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 26, 2009 12:40 AM (vKdhq)
Must've been concern over the CO2 generation during said act. Now that you mention it, is this dude the guy behind that strange new workout device for women that strangely simulates a hand job?
Posted by: CDR M at November 25, 2009 08:43 PM (cvmTR)
It used to be hotter.
Greenland Borehole Temperatures 0 to 2000 AD
Dahl-Jensen, D. et al.
1998: Past temperature directly from the Greenland Ice Sheet, Science, 282, 268-271.
Corresponding graph from 8000 BC to present:
Greenland Borehole Temperatures
Dahl-Jensen, D. et al.
1998: Past temperature directly from the Greenland Ice Sheet, Science, 282, 268-271.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at November 25, 2009 08:45 PM (tm15w)
Well, who does these days?
I suppose, as a mathematician, I could argue that their excessive NSF funding for fraud prevented funding for other scientists, including myself.
As to the future, I trust the greed of other scientists to overcome their leftward tendencies. They'll know it's a fraud even if the general public doesn't.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 25, 2009 08:46 PM (ItSLQ)
Posted by: Pelayo at November 25, 2009 08:49 PM (wwQxi)
Posted by: rawmuse at November 25, 2009 08:49 PM (5gYOP)
Posted by: curious at November 25, 2009 08:50 PM (p302b)
Posted by: CDR M at November 26, 2009 12:36 AM (cvmTR)
Sadly, anyone who doesn't think that The Precedent is a near retard, yet, will not be convinced. The Indonesian imbecile has been spewing stupidity for the entirety of pathetic tenure. I mean, how can a guy something so stupid as "profit and earnings ratios" and then lecture us on economics and finance? His administration's insane unemployment predictions were savaged by reality within a month, after having forced, sight unseen, a waste of $800 billion on our nation, but that hasn't stopped him, and his lunatic useful idiots, from pushing health scare on us - both un-Constitutional and costing in the trillions. Look at how he managed to push that ridiculous adjective-denying Sotomayor onto the SCOTUS.
The left knows that they can do whatever they want and no one is going to stop them. They are suicide bombers who are going out in a blaze of homicidal stupidity. Unfortunately, our population is weak enough to let it happen, as we have seen in the election and the year full of mind-numbing stupidity that ensued.
While it is great to see this fraud exposed, I am afraid that it will come to naught. Our own SCOTUS ruled on CO2 being 'pollution' (which the left has been running with ever since) and there seems no way to stop these people - short of secession and leaving them in the dust to feed on themselves.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 25, 2009 08:50 PM (A46hP)
Cut and paste the above Tiny URLs. Apparently I made an error in the formats.
It's well worth a look. Amazing graphs.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at November 25, 2009 08:51 PM (tm15w)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 25, 2009 08:51 PM (vKdhq)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 25, 2009 08:53 PM (vKdhq)
Posted by: hous bin pharteen at November 25, 2009 09:07 PM (pU4D7)
Posted by: hous bin pharteen at November 25, 2009 09:11 PM (pU4D7)
The New Zealand scientists responded, blocking further inquiries with such arrogance that their case is totally destroyed, while providing justification for only a couple of adjustments. One of those justifications was a decrease of 0.8C for measurements taken at a station that they claim was moved from 10 feet to 400 feet above sea-level. Bzzztt.... That would be the correction for standard atmosphere temperature change with altitude if you were flying a Cessna. They do not pass go and they do not collect $200.
If you move a station from the sea shore to somewhere inland where the altitude is 400 feet you've changed it from measuring Pacific moderated temperatures to measurinig temperatures somewhere inland. Anyone in LA can tell you the daily difference between temperatures near the water and temperatures 5 miles inland, and can show you the air-conditioning bills, too.
LA is flat as a pancake. It's not a 1.5F (0.8C) adjustment, it's more like 10. So the later data is, oh, as much as +10F compared the earlier data, (depending on if the station moved from the seashore to the Sahara) but they only applied a 1.5F correction, gaining them 8.5 degrees of warming without mother nature playing any role in it at all.
These pseudo-scientists are in for a serious attitude adjustment.
Posted by: George Turner at November 25, 2009 09:12 PM (mINv3)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 25, 2009 09:15 PM (vKdhq)
Gormless is the word, I believe. Subjective, but that's what I think when I see people chew gum with their mouths open.
Once the lady he was playing with made a contract-losing mistake, and he announces to the room that 'we're going to get a lesson here'.
Classy, dude.
Posted by: Mr. Lips at November 25, 2009 09:23 PM (Jn/uA)
It's earlier than that. You can see the similar "maximum" around 1880, but shifted in whole downward.
I'm going to presume that somethings hokey about Salinger's work. To see that much similarity between the graphs reveals a very sophisticated manipulation of the raw data.
Hopefully Salinger's explanation will be something other than:
• You're too dumb to understand
• Shut up
• The science is settled
Posted by: David in San Diego at November 25, 2009 09:26 PM (GF+6V)
Lots of reasons. Normalizing a data set to a uniform TOD, and/or correct for heat island effects and relocated sample stations leap to mind. Stations move all the time and people sometimes change the TOD they make their measurements at.
That doesn't mean the "corrected" values necessarily reflect reality though. They are statistical guesses, and might actually be quite different than what really happened on any specific day at any specific recording station. It might have been clear in the morning then cloudy all day and the temps didn't rise as much as the "correction" would make it do for a mid day measurement versus early morning.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 25, 2009 09:29 PM (dtmsl)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 25, 2009 09:30 PM (vKdhq)
The author of the graph, one Dr. Salinger, created the his version of the infamous "Hockey Stick" in the 80's while he worked at none other than the CRU at University of East Anglia.
Dude, that is nothing. I learned how to play hockey at the CRU. So did Wayne Gretzky. Granted, he was a little better than me, but they teach the best hocky at East Anglia CRU in the fooking world, and I challenge anyone who would dispute that.
Posted by: Chef Boy RD (rdb) at November 25, 2009 09:32 PM (bd2mQ)
hellz bellz. something happened with an italics tag
Posted by: Chef Boy RD (rdb) at November 25, 2009 09:33 PM (bd2mQ)
Am I the only one that was shocked (shocked I tell you) that the raw data had never been released?
I always assumed that part was a 'gimmie' and we were down to interpreting data sets, not that the entire raw data was, as Ace put it, the Coke formula.
Did anyone else know that?
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at November 25, 2009 09:37 PM (H7Rlw)
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at November 26, 2009 01:37 AM (H7Rlw)
This has been public for a while. Hansen was particularly weird about his data and "methods". WND did a series a year or two ago about the sad state of the physical measurement facilities, with a picture of a few on ashpalt in the sun, next to exhaust, ...
That's why none of this was ever science to anyone but non-scientists. Sure, there were always a few smart people who bought this, like Chu, but they are generally emotional basketcases who just want to hang with the cool kids so much that they'd eat their own arms off for it. A pathetic bunch, they are.
If it were up to me, given the raw scope of this fraud and the blemish on real science that they caused, I would have a brazen bull for each one of these worms, and all of the politicos who supported them. Every last one.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 25, 2009 09:43 PM (A46hP)
Fox News, with Beck and the ones you hate, should move out of NYC before the next strike you ignore is coming.
Posted by: hous bin pharteen at November 25, 2009 09:44 PM (pU4D7)
That's why none of this was ever science to anyone but non-scientists. Sure, there were always a few smart people who bought this, like Chu, but they are generally emotional basketcases who just want to hang with the cool kids so much that they'd eat their own arms off for it. A pathetic bunch, they are.
If it were up to me, given the raw scope of this fraud and the blemish on real science that they caused, I would have a brazen bull for each one of these worms, and all of the politicos who supported them. Every last one.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 26, 2009 01:43 AM (A46hP)
Yep! I'm absolutely pissed about this, and feel the need to end some very prominent careers. I just don't know who to fully trust with that task.
Thanks for the info.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at November 25, 2009 09:49 PM (H7Rlw)
Posted by: hous bin pharteen at November 25, 2009 09:49 PM (pU4D7)
Posted by: Rodney at November 25, 2009 09:54 PM (c6mrx)
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at November 26, 2009 01:49 AM (H7Rlw)
Unfortunately, pretty much no one can be trusted. Our society is too stupid and gullible - as was the great lesson of Nov 2008. Our SCOTUS has proved itself ignorant and dangerous. Chances are that, not only will these slimebags get away with their crime, but the insane global warming legislation will continue. There are just not enough people with sense.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 25, 2009 10:02 PM (A46hP)
Posted by: arhooley at November 25, 2009 10:07 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: arhooley at November 25, 2009 10:11 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: arhooley at November 25, 2009 10:17 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: arhooley at November 25, 2009 10:22 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: hous bin pharteen at November 25, 2009 10:45 PM (pU4D7)
Posted by: GrimJack at November 25, 2009 10:48 PM (d0sH2)
Hey, you haven't seen a gold ring lying around somewhere, have you? First person to find my precious gets un-banned at the internets.
Posted by: Charles "Gollum" Johnson at November 25, 2009 10:56 PM (j88uA)
A couple years ago I tried looking around the internet for some of those old predictions of water levels, with no luck. It would be amusing to see some of them.
Posted by: kurtilator at November 25, 2009 11:05 PM (juh4Z)
Posted by: gau at November 25, 2009 11:13 PM (n1uMU)
Courtesy of Time Magazine, ANother Ice Age, June 24, 1974 (some interesting excerpts):
As they review the bizarre and unpredictable weather pattern of the past several years, a growing number of scientists are beginning to suspect that many seemingly contradictory meteorological fluctuations are actually part of a global climatic upheaval. However widely the weather varies from place to place and time to time, when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age.
Telltale signs are everywhere —from the unexpected persistence and thickness of pack ice in the waters around Iceland to the southward migration of a warmth-loving creature like the armadillo from the Midwest.Since the 1940s the mean global temperature has dropped about 2.7° F. Although that figure is at best an estimate, it is supported by other convincing data. When Climatologist George J. Kukla of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory and his wife Helena analyzed satellite weather data for the Northern Hemisphere, they found that the area of the ice and snow cover had suddenly increased by 12% in 1971 and the increase has persisted ever since. Areas of Baffin Island in the Canadian Arctic, for example, were once totally free of any snow in summer; now they are covered year round.
[ ... ]
Sunspot Cycle. The changing weather is apparently connected with differences in the amount of energy that the earth's surface receives from the sun. Changes in the earth's tilt and distance from the sun could, for instance, significantly increase or decrease the amount of solar radiation falling on either hemisphere—thereby altering the earth's climate. Some observers have tried to connect the eleven-year sunspot cycle with climate patterns, but have so far been unable to provide a satisfactory explanation of how the cycle might be involved.
It's interesting how they noted the sun back then, but threw it away for the later "global warming".
Man, too, may be somewhat responsible for the cooling trend. The University of Wisconsin's Reid A. Bryson and other climatologists suggest that dust and other particles released into the atmosphere as a result of farming and fuel burning may be blocking more and more sunlight from reaching and heating the surface of the earth.
Lo and behold, the exact same human actions that were causing global cooling came to be the causes of global warming!!! Amazing.
Pseudo-science is really quite extraordinary. It can explain anything and everything, without changing any of the inputs.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 25, 2009 11:27 PM (A46hP)
Posted by: Victoria at November 25, 2009 11:56 PM (3sdjL)
Scientists lied, economies may still die. These revelations aren't going to be a silver bullet, not yet. They may eventually develop into one, but we're not there yet.
The best that can be hoped for at this point in time is some additional seeds of doubt get planted and a few more people with a little bit of juice start asking pointed questions.
It will take at minimum several years to slay this beast if its even possible at all.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 26, 2009 12:03 AM (dtmsl)
Posted by: BoutrosBoutros at November 26, 2009 12:26 AM (JHrEZ)
Right now most people don't care because they don't see their lives affected at all by this AGW fraud. The larger the footprint it becomes in people's lives the closer they will look at the truth of the 'science'.
There is a line somewhere. Will people tolerate living in forced poverty to save the planet while carbon billionaires and government regulators jet around the world, living a live that would be the envy of the Roman Emperors? If so, this issue will be around for a long, long time.
Posted by: gau at November 26, 2009 12:35 AM (n1uMU)
I can understand adjustment of temps for changes in environmental surroundings such as "heat island" effects from concrete etc but the impact of these adjustments should be to drive the calculated temps down from the measured temps.
Instead every case that researchers have been able to come up with when they "adjust them" the resultant is always an increase.
This is what got NASA in trouble with their proxy data from satellites. They blamed it on an error in a Y2-K fix but never did explain the mechanism behind that. The person (I believe this was McEntyre as well) who discovered the problem with the calcs had to go around NASA to get the calculation methodology. They refused to release it and stonewalled to the end. But in the end they were forced to retract their (at the time) 8 out of 10 bogus claim.
This was the second major error that was published that showed huge mistakes in their increased temps. Note that the first was the ommision of hundreds of years worth of data from the hockey stick showing the medieval warm period. Back in my blogging days at Townhall we had a link to an individual posted who said he was one of the "peer reviewers" for the IPPC(?) and he turned in comments on the original work which were blown off. He asked that his name be removed as a reviewer and they refused.
After the second instance of this I determined at that time it was out and out fraud. The use of the term "hoax" is to weak to describe this. A hoax is a joke you play for humor. When you create stuff like this to falsely obtain money it is FRAUD and a swindle.
Everyone pushing this crap should be prosecuted and thrown in jail.
Posted by: Vic at November 26, 2009 12:40 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: I Am Jack's Tired Posterior at November 26, 2009 01:02 AM (e6y5x)
I will confess that the thought of Al Gore being sued penniless and having to stand in the criminal dock makes my mouth water like Pavlov's dog.
It is Thanksgiving and I should be more temperate, but he does not deserve it.
Posted by: Spinach at November 26, 2009 02:46 AM (reOM8)
Never mind this stuff,, you will have cap and tax, remember- I won!
OsamaHusseinIslamObama 2012'
(the terrorist-Uighur-ACORN-media choice)
-It's never too early to campaign-
Posted by: Barry Soetoro (D-King OF The World!!) at November 26, 2009 03:20 AM (gJC42)
Man IS warming the Earth.
But only on paper, and only scientists are doing it, but still...
Posted by: nickless at November 26, 2009 03:24 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Huckleberry at November 26, 2009 03:47 AM (F71c5)
Posted by: Case at November 26, 2009 03:52 AM (0K+Kw)
Posted by: MSM at November 26, 2009 03:52 AM (vc/Tl)
69
Someone on another blog linked to that story in response to a commenter who denied that there was a global-cooling scare in the '70s-- the commenter then claimed that the link went to a blank page (it didn't). Hysterical blindness?
I remember a documentary on a local TV station at the time called "We Will Freeze In The Dark", about the double-whammy effect of global cooling and the Energy Crisis... but I guess that never actually aired or something.
Posted by: Golem14 at November 26, 2009 03:53 AM (2X8VA)
Yes, it was real. Also a "we're running out of resources and will all die in the next 20 years" crisis. In fact, one of my college professors (a professor of chemistry, no less!) treated the notorious book Limits to Growth as serious evidence of this. In reality the book was an early example of the folly of basing draconian public policy recommendations on dubious computer models.
Posted by: pst314 at November 26, 2009 03:58 AM (XP0Bd)
Didn't New Zealand have some (since redecated) economically devestating new laws put in effect with regards to carbon emissions?
Posted by: Cincinnatus at November 26, 2009 04:01 AM (f4sLg)
Posted by: tmitsss at November 26, 2009 04:05 AM (mNyvj)
Posted by: Usful Ijit at November 26, 2009 04:29 AM (+8fSS)
Posted by: fluffy, usefuller eejit at November 26, 2009 04:31 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: useless idiot at November 26, 2009 04:33 AM (n1uMU)
Posted by: Intl Assoc of Phrenology at November 26, 2009 04:43 AM (YCVBL)
Then I went into the workforce, got married, had children, and didn't keep up with professional publications. Some time after 1979 the ice age morphed into the earth will burn up. I was puzzled about what new numbers had caused this revised cllimate prediction, but I didn't really investigate. I always thought it was bogus because I had seen the earlier numbers.
I am also puzzled about why the tree rings were considered evidence of temperature. When I was in school, thicker tree rings were a sign of more moisture, not temperature. Trees, like all plants, vary in their response to temperature. For example, my roses grow larger and better in cooler summers, rather than hot ones. As I said, I haven't kept up with the publications so perhaps there was a reason for the correlation of the tree rings with the temperatures, but when Rush was discussing yesterday about how the rings of current trees don't correlate with temperature, I remembered that it never had been taken as a temperature indicator in the past.
Posted by: Miss Marple at November 26, 2009 04:51 AM (4DwVn)
Posted by: Barry Soetoro (D-King OF The World!!) at November 26, 2009 04:55 AM (gJC42)
I've constructed the actual source code used for the temperature projections and used it to formulate a forecast for traffic patterns at 'AOSHQ'. Currently, the forecast is for 845,226,751.8 unique visitors per day by the end of 2012.
'Tiny soccer balls with a missing bicycle seat' has been on the decline, and should see a further decline from the current 1,287 unique visitors per day to 83.6 by the end of 2012.
Naturally, this is all based on science, and to deny it means you are a creationist and unworthy of a response. Our source code, of course, is covered under intellectual property laws.
Posted by: We're Scientists, man at November 26, 2009 04:59 AM (JFNQ7)
72 / Purple Avenger:
I agree that this will probably not kill the beast. Perhaps it will firmly establish that belief in AGW is a religious faith not science.
95 / Miss Marple:
Yes, I remember that wrt tree rings: thicker means just a better growing year in general (moisture and sunlight regularly through the season in addition to a longer growing season)
One of the most damning recent exposures against the AGW Cabal is that they cherry-picked 12 (yes, only twelve) trees for their dataset. They discarded many other tree data sets that did not show what they desired.
Posted by: Huckleberry at November 26, 2009 05:05 AM (F71c5)
If the earth's atmosphere has an ozone hole, the ozone has gone somewhere, hasn't it? Where has it gone? Can we make more? Why yes we can! Here in the midwest we have "ozone alerts" on hot, still days, when we are producing too much exhaust from internal combustion engines. So we are not to drive our cars as much in order to cut down on the ozone production.
But wait! Does the ozone we produce here on the surface not rise? Can't it migrate up to the place where the ozone hangs out? Is it different ozone? No, ozone is ozone, O3. There is no good ozone and bad ozone.
If there is too much ozone here on the surface caused by internal combustion engines, how is it that the same internal combustion engines are the cause of the ozone hole?
I think about this question every summer. Still don't have a good answer.
Posted by: Miss Marple at November 26, 2009 05:08 AM (4DwVn)
If the Republicans regain the majority in the House then they will get the committee chairmanships back. Then they could convene public hearings with subpoena power.
Posted by: Huckleberry at November 26, 2009 05:10 AM (F71c5)
99 / MM:
As I recall: Engines emit NOx. Sunlight breaks down NOx's to O3. Not sure if low altitude O3 make it to the poles / holes or not, but it does cause EPA Ozone Alerts.
In the oil and gas drilling industry we have equiped many of our diesel engines with urea injection systems in the exhaust to scavenge the NOx's for EPA compliance.
Posted by: Huckleberry at November 26, 2009 05:19 AM (F71c5)
http://www.signon.org.nz/ (13th one along)
http://tinyurl.com/ylkxnrx
http://tinyurl.com/y8sqq7s
"The science is bloody obvious!"
Indeed, Dr Salinger. Indeed.
Posted by: Jim Salinger is a tool at November 26, 2009 05:31 AM (bnkVm)
Understanding chaos theory is not something I will ever attain to other than reading a (James Gleick) book. But concepts like extreme dependence on initial conditions --butterfly effect, make it apparent that even the smallest tweaks to a set of data can have big effects on a projection.
The bunker mentality and hidden agenda content of the CRU emails takes the trust out of anything they have touched. It will take people like those at climateaudit.org to spot those cute little subtle tweaks to the data. Their horror is on a higher professional plane than a beat down with a hockey stick, although that must be tempting after years of being stonewalled.
Posted by: AE at November 26, 2009 05:38 AM (kSfPT)
Posted by: Usful Ijit at November 26, 2009 05:40 AM (+8fSS)
104: ... yeah, I got it the first time and liked it.
Man-made man-made Global Warming. Never not throwing rocks at the moon.
Posted by: Huckleberry at November 26, 2009 05:49 AM (F71c5)
The great "Ozone Hole" scare was another scam. The NASA website Used to have a graph showing the size of the "hole" trended over several decades. Like temperatures it went up and down and generally had a lot of "noise" in the trend line. The overall long term trend however had no change.
This was after decades of the restrictions on Freon. IOW, banning Freon-12 had no impact what so ever. All of the extra expense that the "western nations" had gone to had no impact other than create a temporary black market for China to manufacture Freon-12 for smuggling to the U.S.
Like AGW the entire thing was a scam. The word got out that there was a graph on the NASA site that showed this and it went viral. After that NASA removed the chart.
Posted by: Vic at November 26, 2009 05:58 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: GarandFan at November 26, 2009 06:31 AM (ZQBnQ)
Posted by: Cap N' Trade at November 26, 2009 06:37 AM (4iIhs)
This reality setting in will really gain momentum when the employers of these "scientists", ie the universities, start throwing them under the bus for fear of permanent damage to the university at large.
For example, I believe Penn State has a prominent professor involved in the email scandal. The hotter this gets, so to speak, the more PSU will have to decide...go all in and risk total reputation ruin or cut ties with the professor? And, in order to cut ties with a tenored professor, they will need reasons that pass legal mustard...reasons like, oh I don't know, fradulent research?
Posted by: The Hammer at November 26, 2009 06:47 AM (YBTwf)
72 / Purple Avenger:
I agree that this will probably not kill the beast. Perhaps it will firmly establish that belief in AGW is a religious faith not science.
95 / Miss Marple:
Yes, I remember that wrt tree rings: thicker means just a better growing year in general (moisture and sunlight regularly through the season in addition to a longer growing season)
One of the most damning recent exposures against the AGW Cabal is that they cherry-picked 12 (yes, only twelve) trees for their dataset. They discarded many other tree data sets that did not show what they desired.
Yes, the Yamal data.
IIRC that 12 trees reduced to 5 and then finally 1. Also, only one tree in that teensy weensy data set had the hockey stick. I think Dendrotologists or whatever they are called recommend a minimum of 50 trees in a data set.
But the science is settled!
*rolls eyes*
Posted by: Mark at November 26, 2009 07:01 AM (Vvbjc)
NASA has been sued for not releasing similar data via FOI. Holdren is knee deep in this. The best defense the GoreBull Wormers have presented - gee, it's only one researcher. Guess they didn't take the time to read the emails or any center-right sites.
Oblunder is off to Copehagen to rally the troops. Probably work as well politically back home as that Olympic thingy. This Admin is so corrupt, incompetent, and ham fisted there's never a dull moment. Problem is - I wonder how many people will to too fatigued to vote in 2010.
Posted by: MDr at November 26, 2009 07:02 AM (ucq49)
I hope these vegan pricks can't even look at food today.
"Mommy, why is daddy so sad this Holiday season"?
"Cuz he's a lying scumbag dear".
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 26, 2009 07:02 AM (ENiLZ)
In reality, most modern temperatures need to be adjusted downwards to account for Urban Heat Island Effect (UHIE). An independent crew has been going around taking pictures of today's weather stations and showing how the siting has been compromised over time as civilization grew up around what were somewhat isolated collection points that are now in the middle of a city.
The hockey stick is true, it's just that the morons have it upside down!
Posted by: chuck in st paul at November 26, 2009 07:05 AM (adr25)
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 26, 2009 07:11 AM (ENiLZ)
Posted by: alexthechick at November 26, 2009 07:12 AM (bQ5xy)
102 My high school physics teacher Mr. Hovey was a stickler for precision. If you took your stopwatch and tape measure and calculated and reported an answer of 2.140728 meters per second instead of 2.14 +/- .05 you got marked wrong. Not down, but wrong. Thirty years later that lesson has not been forgotten.
I had an Electrical engineering prof who used to have us do quick problems on slide rules during class. When someone gave an answer such as, "That's 6.786 ohms, Perfesser Nelson", he would goggle and say "That's some slide rule you got there, son!"
THE POINT being, you can't get four-digit accuracy on a slide rule.
So over the years I've wondered where all this precision comes from regarding atmospheric temperature. How, for example, does one measure an "average" for an utterly chaoitic and dynamic system where half the earth is dark and the rest is light ---except over the course of a day when the situation is reversed, and except that seasonal change makes every average different on every day!
Can anyone tell me who sets the base line "average, how they do it, and how they justify what we used to call in high school chem class "sig figs", or significant figures? Does anyone really believe that humans had uniformly accurate thermometers spread all across the globe, and over the oceans?
I'm certainly aware that western nations undertook great surveys and data collections from the 19th century onward, but how accurate, how complete were they?
Anyone know?
Posted by: effinayright at November 26, 2009 07:20 AM (7M8Py)
Early Christmas present from The Onion:
"Obama Home Teleprompter Malfunctions During Family Dinner."
Posted by: Cathy at November 26, 2009 07:21 AM (OMqu4)
Man is causing the world to burn up, man is causing the world to freeze, man is giving to blow up the world with nukes by the year 2000, the Glock is an invisible plastic/ceramic gun that can't be seen under x-ray, concealed carry laws will make gun violence explode, the KY census worker was killed by Glenn Beck.
Does the left ever get tired of being wrong every damn time about every damn thing?
Posted by: Crusty at November 26, 2009 07:24 AM (qzgbP)
Posted by: steevy at November 26, 2009 07:24 AM (VYmFp)
Whoa...from the Ottawa Sun...not normally known for being sensible:
tinyurl.com/ycqf3bo
"If you're wondering how the robot-like march of the world's politicians towards Copenhagen can possibly continue in the face of the scientific scandal dubbed "climategate," it's because Big Government, Big Business and Big Green don't give a s*** about "the science.....they never have."
...like Instapundit says, be sure to read it all
Posted by: beedubya at November 26, 2009 07:25 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Huckleberry at November 26, 2009 07:27 AM (F71c5)
99 hucklebberry,
so do you guys refill the urea injection tanks on Friday beer nights? Or do you import? Just curious...
Posted by: chuck in st paul at November 26, 2009 07:28 AM (adr25)
I'm certainly aware that western nations undertook great surveys and data collections from the 19th century onward, but how accurate, how complete were they?
Posted by: effinayright at November 26, 2009 11:20 AM (7M8Py)
Right.. see, on all those old maps, at the edges of explored space where they had little inscriptions like "Here thayre bay Dragones!", what they really meant by giant fire-breathing lizards was Global Warming.
Posted by: krakatoa at November 26, 2009 07:30 AM (hQbvm)
sorry, that was supposed to be "100" huckleberry not 99
okay, so my adjustment downwards of past values may not be scientifically defensible... but it's the truth, I swear
Posted by: chuck in st paul at November 26, 2009 07:30 AM (adr25)
@ 122
This is getting scary, this ability for a Moron Mind Meld.
My past life was base on the ability to accurately measure things. And when I say accurate, I mean down to .0001 inches. For reference, a piece of paper is around .003 of an inch.
My question is this: How accurate were thermometers one hundred years ago? Were they +/- 1 degree? 2 degrees? .5 degrees? This is a small but not insignificant difference when your trying to establish data for a long period of time.
Another point: How many of them were there? It seems that we've only been able to accurately measure temperature for 150 years or so. As the length of time recedes, the accuracy of the measurements become less and less precise, since before that time, there were no intruments to measure with.
We can't allow ourselves to be confused between data and our increasing accuracy in measurement.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 26, 2009 07:31 AM (ZGhSv)
Posted by: Zimriel at November 26, 2009 07:32 AM (rtzHA)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at November 26, 2009 07:32 AM (tm15w)
Posted by: african chick at November 26, 2009 07:39 AM (9VOeE)
Posted by: Huckleberry at November 26, 2009 07:40 AM (F71c5)
Yes, the Yamal data.
IIRC that 12 trees reduced to 5 and then finally 1. Also, only one tree in that teensy weensy data set had the hockey stick. I think Dendrotologists or whatever they are called recommend a minimum of 50 trees in a data set
The suspicious use of cherry-picked samples goes back to this story from 2005!"When we compared data as used by Mann with original archived data, we found one and only one example where the early values of a series had been extrapolated -- a cedar tree ring series from the Gaspe peninsula in Canada. The extrapolation, from 1404 back to 1400, had the effect of allowing this series to be included in the critical early 15th-century calculations."
and
"we sent in a second version of the article in which we demonstrated that these 14 tree rings were all from highly controversial bristlecone pine series, studied by Graybill and Idso in 1993, which showed an unusual growth spurt in the 20th century. Graybill and Idso themselves attributed the growth spurt to higher concentrations of CO2 in the air, because they were able to show that it was not caused by increased temperatures. Oddly enough, in their 1999 article, Mann and his colleagues had actually admitted the same thing: 'A number of tree ring series at high altitudes in the western part of the United States seem to show a prolonged growth spurt that is more pronounced than can be explained with the measured increase in temperature in these regions.'"
and strikingly
"On Mann's FTP site, the directory for the North American network contains a subdirectory with the striking name BACKTO_1400-CENSORED. The folder contains PCs that looked like the ones we produced, but it was not clear how they had been calculated. We wondered if the folder had anything to do with the bristlecone pine series: This was a bulls eye. We were able to show that the 14 bristlecone pine series that effectively made up Mann's PC1 (and six others) had been excluded from the PC calculations in the censored folder. Without the bristlecones sites, there were no hockey sticks for Mann's method to mine for,"
I fancy a set of ropes lashed to the branches of some bristlecone pines.
Figuratively, of course. I wouldn't want to use language like Ellen Goodman, who said in February 2007 "Let's just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with Holocaust deniers."
Posted by: George Orwell at November 26, 2009 07:49 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: logprof at November 26, 2009 07:49 AM (I3Udb)
Posted by: eman at November 26, 2009 07:49 AM (R484t)
Just to reply to Backwardsboy,
I now live near Kansas City. Whenever they show the highs for this date, (especially during the summer), the highs are always in the early '30's.
Not 1998, which according to the AGW boys was the hottest yr. on record.
Which means that KC is using real data, not any 'adjusted' temps.
Interesting, at least to me.
Posted by: HH at November 26, 2009 07:50 AM (+jvXp)
Posted by: Socratease at November 26, 2009 07:52 AM (tSkqL)
Acutely observed.
That's also why I stick to Val-U-Rite. It may not be pedigreed, but it's clean.
Posted by: George Orwell at November 26, 2009 07:53 AM (AZGON)
Cash-strapped school districts need to go after K-12 textbook publishers in the courts for restitution for pushing fraudulent "science" in their materials. These publishers have lists of degreed gatekeepers on either payroll or retainer to lend authority to the content (and to bar entry to any potential competition) and the textbooks themselves cost a fortune.
Any successes with these lawsuits will force the publishers to go after the other players to spread or pass the blame.
Posted by: MikeO at November 26, 2009 07:55 AM (dYNrR)
Funny how the solution is always socialism.
Posted by: butch at November 26, 2009 08:02 AM (myCYQ)
Cash-strapped school districts need to go after K-12 textbook publishers in the courts for restitution for pushing fraudulent "science" in their materials.
Ahh, Mike. The K-12 crew is getting the next crew of deranged assholes ready.
See also Minnesota college requires future teachers to proclaim their personal, (real/imagined ) racism in order to graduate.
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 26, 2009 08:04 AM (ENiLZ)
Oh, I've got a citation for you. "Quintet," an extremely obscure Robert Altman film that takes place in a nearly frozen Earth, and what's left of mankind lives underground... and with doom looming, the premise for this nearly unwatchable, dull, incomprehensible film is that of a murder mystery. Because you see, since everyone is going to die of cold and starvation eventually, the entertaining pastime that is all the rage in the underground colony is a board game where the loser gets murdered. Seriously.
Paul Newman was in this film, and probably thanked his liberal gods every day that more people saw "Gigli" than this film.
Posted by: George Orwell at November 26, 2009 08:07 AM (AZGON)
Heck, one good thing I've seen is that even my local rag The Kansas City Star paper is starting to notice this. Even linked by Instapundit!
Even better, if ya'll have seen, there seems to be a huge backlash of posters against papers that are supporting Copenhagen or Global Warming.
Reporters seem to be the lagging indicator here.
But I get the feeling that they are going to have to get up to speed really quick.
This much criticism, this fast, is going to force the MSM to take a long, hard look at AGW and the 'hack'.
Of course it's only been a week.
Posted by: HH at November 26, 2009 08:08 AM (+jvXp)
Posted by: Minnie Rodent at November 26, 2009 08:10 AM (PZLW0)
But I get the feeling that they are going to have to get up to speed really quick.
So if we graph reporters' opinions, filling in for gaps and generating proxies, as Copenhagen approaches do we get a hockey stick?
At least for beating them?
Posted by: George Orwell at November 26, 2009 08:10 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Charles Johnson at November 26, 2009 08:14 AM (i0WE5)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Guinness, and Near Miss Meteors at November 26, 2009 08:14 AM (erIg9)
When the turkey hits, the Earth will be engulfed in a shroud of Nuclear Sleepiness!!!11!11!
Posted by: George Orwell at November 26, 2009 08:16 AM (AZGON)
So if we graph reporters' opinions, filling in for gaps and generating proxies, as Copenhagen approaches do we get a hockey stick?
At least for beating them?
(laughs)
Hell, I'm all for it!
But it will be a cold stick...
Posted by: HH at November 26, 2009 08:17 AM (+jvXp)
Posted by: Tar Minyatur III at November 26, 2009 08:19 AM (bFy4C)
Posted by: urrrrrrrgh! at November 26, 2009 08:21 AM (I3Udb)
I killed a hobbit once. In Reno. Just to watch him die.
Posted by: CharlieGibson at November 26, 2009 08:23 AM (ENiLZ)
Posted by: eman at November 26, 2009 08:25 AM (R484t)
Since AGW is now firmly established as a religion instead of science, perhaps the disciples will sacrifice Al Gore to Gaia.
The winter or summer solstice would be appropriate days, but I haven't decided what method would be most appropriate. A few ideas...
- dropped from a helicopter into a live volcano or ice floe
- blasted into space on a trajectory to the sun
- returned to nature naked in the Amazon or Arctic
Help!
Posted by: Huckleberry at November 26, 2009 08:26 AM (F71c5)
here's another email from Phil Jones
Mike,
Stephen McIntyre is becoming a real pain in the arse and can really bollix things up for us. Do you happen to know Jeff Gillooly's phone number?
Cheers,
Phil
Posted by: a.k.a. the man with no name at November 26, 2009 08:27 AM (JY1gZ)
Posted by: eman at November 26, 2009 08:31 AM (R484t)
Posted by: guy who likes to say "I can neither confirm or deny" at November 26, 2009 08:31 AM (Vu6sl)
116
"NASA has been sued for not releasing similar data via FOI. Holdren is knee deep in this. The best defense the GoreBull Wormers have presented - gee, it's only one researcher. Guess they didn't take the time to read the emails or any center-right sites"
No doubt. That frickin' whack job has his fingerprints all over this scam. Why not? It's a nice fit for his goals.
It was never about science.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at November 26, 2009 08:33 AM (JK1hx)
No need to get obscure. The first line of the chorus of "London Calling" is "The ice age is coming." It ends in a flood, like all apocalypses do, regardless of temperature.
And Quintet is a great parody of Bergman, whether it means to be or not.
Posted by: oblig. at November 26, 2009 08:34 AM (rQ95J)
If by Bergman you mean "irrepressibly dull," you have a point.
Posted by: George Orwell at November 26, 2009 08:36 AM (AZGON)
The AGW worshipers have been doing sex to us for nearly 30 years and the R's who have been duped need to take their lumps and admit their mistake.
Posted by: The Hammer at November 26, 2009 08:36 AM (YBTwf)
Their destination is the same point on the horizon as Reid and Pelosi
Posted by: Hugh Jasteroid at November 26, 2009 08:43 AM (Vse0J)
Posted by: torabora at November 26, 2009 08:48 AM (fkU6c)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 26, 2009 08:50 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: Gov. William J. LePetomaine, Ph.D. at November 26, 2009 08:53 AM (w41GQ)
Posted by: GarandFan at November 26, 2009 08:59 AM (ZQBnQ)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 26, 2009 09:02 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Alex's Cabin at November 26, 2009 09:05 AM (G8e6m)
Posted by: chaos at November 26, 2009 09:15 AM (mFUln)
As a wise man once said:
“The public must be able to trust the science and scientific process informing public policy decisions. Political officials should not suppress or alter scientific or technological findings and conclusions. If scientific and technological information is developed and used by the Federal Government, it should ordinarily be made available to the public. To the extent permitted by law, there should be transparency in the preparation, identification, and use of scientific and technological information in policymaking. The selection of scientists and technology professionals for positions in the executive branch should be based on their scientific and technological knowledge, credentials, experience, and integrity.”
Obama, March 2009
Then he selected Holdren as science czar.
Posted by: starboardhelm at November 26, 2009 09:28 AM (SgSfB)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 26, 2009 09:43 AM (BmbsW)
In addition to the numerous lawsuits that should result from the largest hoax ever perpetrated on Earth, we should demand that every law and regulation that was based on it be repealed immediately.
They screamed there was no time to waste in writing these laws. Let's see how serious they really are when confronted with the truth.
No bullshit, no excuses, no nothing. Just hop to it, right now. Every day that passes without this happening is a slap in our face by politicians who refuse to recognize reality and do what is right, respectable, and honorable.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 26, 2009 09:44 AM (ZGhSv)
Posted by: Grant Seeking Climatologist at November 26, 2009 09:46 AM (y29/1)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 26, 2009 09:47 AM (BmbsW)
Think of the arrogance and self-importance dripping from that statement. But, it used to be the basis for skepticism and made scientists question everything.
Now, juxtapose that type of sentiment with the undying belief the AGW scientists have invested in warming. They have suspended all skepticism and are sacraficing their careers on the alter of Gaia.
Posted by: The Hammer at November 26, 2009 09:48 AM (YBTwf)
what if they're right? what if 100,000 years from now the Earth's temperature rises a couple of degrees and polar bears start dropping from the sky?
wow, we'll have egg on our faces if that happens. so maybe we shouldn't dance in the streets quite yet. After all, don't you care about your great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandchildren?
Posted by: a.k.a. the man with no name at November 26, 2009 09:48 AM (XiLyG)
Watching the games too today (of course) I hope I'm still #1 on one of the AoS teams today but if I'm not so be it, I can't be pissed today unless Dallas lose. hahahahahahah!
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 26, 2009 01:47 PM (BmbsW)
If there is a god, Dallas will lose to Oakland today.
Posted by: Blazer at November 26, 2009 09:51 AM (+FzLa)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 26, 2009 09:52 AM (BmbsW)
Posted by: Joseph McCarthy's Envelopes at November 26, 2009 09:54 AM (zr6lP)
happy thanksgiving fellow kos'ers, i am so thankful we have obama and the sexy michelle!!
oops, wrong site, ignore this post
oh, agw is is a lie!! damn you glen beck.....
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 26, 2009 09:57 AM (PfaTc)
I refuse to celebrate a day that a race of people were thrown into bondage and then exterminated.
Have fun with your turkey's creationists !
I bid you adieu.
Posted by: Charles "Ward Churchill" Johnson at November 26, 2009 09:59 AM (+FzLa)
Let's all do One Thingtm. (Don't you hate these commercials?)
What's your One Thingtm?
I reckon I'll plant a tree shrub flower to save or create 12 children in Africa from Global Warming.
What's your One Thingtm?
Posted by: a.k.a. the man with no name at November 26, 2009 09:59 AM (XiLyG)
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 26, 2009 10:00 AM (PfaTc)
I refuse to celebrate a day that a race of people were thrown into bondage
folsum street in san fransisco?
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 26, 2009 10:01 AM (PfaTc)
Deep fried twinkies? Check!
Banana Moon Pies? Check!
Bag of 7-11 hot dogs? Check!
Cranberry wine coolers? Check!
Must be a Holiday!
Posted by: Flying Monkey at November 26, 2009 10:02 AM (Oxen1)
It must be a local thing, but I'm sure every region has their own version, joe.
Up here in Boston, our big AM radio station does PSA's for people to do One Thing to save the environment. Use less electricity, walk to work, etc.
Posted by: a.k.a. the man with no name at November 26, 2009 10:04 AM (XiLyG)
Posted by: logprof at November 26, 2009 10:06 AM (A+6fk)
Shower with a friend?
Posted by: OregonMuse at November 26, 2009 10:06 AM (hoowK)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at November 26, 2009 10:07 AM (muUqs)
Up here in Boston, our big AM radio station does PSA's for people to do One Thing to save the environment. Use less electricity, walk to work, etc.
Posted by: a.k.a. the man with no name at November 26, 2009 02:04 PM (XiLyG)
Sell your private jet?
The deuce you say?
Posted by: Celebrities everywhere. at November 26, 2009 10:08 AM (+FzLa)
whoa whoa whoa! You can't get rid of your jets. How else are you gonna travel around the world and raise awareness about Global Warming?
Posted by: a.k.a. the man with no name at November 26, 2009 10:09 AM (XiLyG)
199 okay, one thing, hmmmmmmm
since i drive a big ass lincoln about 250-300 miles a day i'll up it about another 20
i see it as mother earth having a cigarette on me
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 26, 2009 10:09 AM (PfaTc)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 26, 2009 10:11 AM (BmbsW)
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 26, 2009 10:11 AM (PfaTc)
You know how Cash for Clunkers was such a success as both an economic stimulant and as a help to save the economy?
Well, I'm gonna go out tonight and pour sodium silicate in every car I find with an Obama sticker. I'm sure all these people want to save the environment and won't mind me destroying their earth-killing combustible engines.
Posted by: a.k.a. the man with no name at November 26, 2009 10:14 AM (XiLyG)
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 26, 2009 10:17 AM (PfaTc)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 26, 2009 10:19 AM (BmbsW)
Global warming Scandal, I'm real happy for you and imma let you finish, but Milli Vanilli had one of the best scandals ever.
Of All Time !
Posted by: Kanye West at November 26, 2009 10:27 AM (+FzLa)
Posted by: Original Roy at November 26, 2009 10:30 AM (17Zlu)
Posted by: a.k.a. the man with no name at November 26, 2009 02:09 PM (XiLyG)
Back in the old days, when Man was not advanced enough to understand the important pseudo-science of climatologyism, they would use astral projection. Modern climate pseudo-scientists, however, have proven that astral projection contributes untold amounts to global warming and, therefore, jetting about the Earth is the cooler alternative. Climate pseudo-scientists note that using jets, as opposed to astral projection, is quite the sacrifice, since they have to pack their clothes, and sit in cramped first-class seats and little, itty-bitty Lears and Gulfstreams for hours and be stuck in awful places and shop in foreign stores ... It's a terrible sacrifice, but it's all about saving GAIA from the evil species of Homo Sapien - the dastardly scourge of the Earth.
When asked why all global warming meetings weren't just virtual meetings, reducing the need for awful jet travel, climate pseudo-scientists responded, "Shut up!"
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 26, 2009 10:33 AM (A46hP)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at November 26, 2009 10:33 AM (h/zKr)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at November 26, 2009 02:33 PM (h/zKr)
You forgot to add that Dubai announced that they will default on their debt, come December, and asked their creditors for a standstill on the repayments.
Good thing they're going to have a 162 story skyscraper out there. What would they have possibly done without it? Building tall in a desert ... can't argue with that sort of reasoning.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 26, 2009 10:38 AM (A46hP)
When asked why all global warming meetings weren't just virtual meetings, reducing the need for awful jet travel, climate pseudo-scientists responded, "Shut up!"
I wondered the same thing when Obama took an entourage to Europe to lobby for the Olympics. He could have done the exact sae thing with a conference call.
Posted by: a.k.a. the man with no name at November 26, 2009 10:40 AM (XiLyG)
btw, Obama couldn't swing by Iraq or Afghanistan on his way home from Asia? What a piece of shit.
Posted by: a.k.a. the man with no name at November 26, 2009 10:44 AM (XiLyG)
Posted by: a.k.a. the man with no name at November 26, 2009 02:40 PM (XiLyG)
The White House was worried that the magic skin tone wouldn't come out just right on the monitor. Without that magic, they are utterly helpless.
The White House later blamed the failure on faulty lighting engineered by the Brazilians, who secretly placed special LED bulbs around the podium.
Samson had his hair ... It's an old story.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 26, 2009 10:44 AM (A46hP)
Just a brief note, the Liberals in Australia are the more-conservative party (old-fashioned liberals); the Left and Far Left are the Australian Labor Party (that's currently the Government) and, of course, the Greens.
Posted by: andycanuck at November 26, 2009 10:46 AM (2qU2d)
Booing crowds and getting pelted with rotten fruit isn't a good photo-op.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 26, 2009 10:52 AM (g35qK)
Reflecting further on my 163 above, I don't think anything listed has that certain elan the occasion requires, therefore I think they should...
Install a clown-cannon on the Greenpeace Artic Sunrise and launch him onto an ice floe to tend the endangered polar bears.
Posted by: Huckleberry at November 26, 2009 10:52 AM (F71c5)
When Al Gore uses a private jet, it's asshole projection not astral projection.
Posted by: andycanuck at November 26, 2009 10:56 AM (2qU2d)
Posted by: logprof at November 26, 2009 10:58 AM (A+6fk)
Thanks much.
When Al Gore uses a private jet, it's asshole projection not astral projection.
Posted by: andycanuck at November 26, 2009 02:56 PM (2qU2d)
ROFLMAO!
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 26, 2009 10:59 AM (A46hP)
Just in time for the holidays. The Charles Johnson commemorative 3-D talking velvet painting. See the pony-tailed bicycle riding ukulele player as you've never seen him before. Up close and personal !
Have a debate about creationism and right wing extremism in your very own living room. Get banned from your very own house !
Available on LuLu for a limited time only at the bargain price of $49.95 while supplies last.
Posted by: Blazer at November 26, 2009 11:00 AM (+FzLa)
Posted by: chris at November 26, 2009 11:07 AM (/jnTB)
We got a loaded for bear sleek new ship of the line here dude. Cross the "T" and start firing broadsides.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 26, 2009 11:16 AM (g35qK)
Posted by: logprof at November 26, 2009 02:58 PM (A+6fk)
You would think that this would temper their future thoughts and behavior, but I fear that this only drives them madder than they already are. This is an overly emotional bunch and I don't think this destruction of the purpose of their lives will be handled well.
My guess would be that they hold out as long as possible, perhaps getting quiet for a while, but will eventually find another man-made doomsday theory to trumpet.
Personally, I have a brazen bull ready to host each and every global warming supporter. Live by the lie of global warming, die by brutally real warming. Sounds fair to me.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 26, 2009 11:16 AM (A46hP)
"I'm debated which FB friends I should throw this at."
How about just go to Starbucks or Borders ? You can spot them by the mother Gaia stickers they have on the back glass of their Ford Expeditions.
Posted by: Blazer at November 26, 2009 11:18 AM (+FzLa)
Posted by: 4k78 at November 26, 2009 11:22 AM (rYlhO)
Posted by: Crusty at November 26, 2009 11:24 AM (qzgbP)
Whisk(e)y Tango Foxtrot
Posted by: 4k78 at November 26, 2009 03:22 PM (rYlhO)
Thats just Chucky's way of sticking his fingers in his ears and going "na-nana-boo-boo, I cant hear yoo"
The guys an intellectual giant I tell you.
Posted by: Blazer at November 26, 2009 11:25 AM (+FzLa)
With one friend of mine, we've just decided on a moratorium on political topics, even when writing private messages. So I'm honoring that but hoping she's reading anything I post on Piltdown Man-made global warming.
Posted by: logprof at November 26, 2009 11:26 AM (A+6fk)
http://tinyurl.com/y8dqs6u
Posted by: tmitsss at November 26, 2009 11:33 AM (V4Pya)
Posted by: RicardoVerde at November 26, 2009 11:45 AM (PBTsv)
My post from the previous Climategate thread:
Perhaps the leaker was testing if the journalist was interested in taking the ball and running with the files.
In which case - EPIC FAIL - the journalist lost the scoop of his career.
It was probably better in the long run that it didn't happen that way, though. A few emails leaked to a journalist can be pretty easily spun--it's a hell of a lot harder to make a 50 MB file of emails, charts, and other documents just go away. East Anglia is doing damage control, the BBC reporter admits he screwed up by not running with the story, and the AGW cultists at realclimate are desperately using any argument they can (including the lame "there's nothing THAT bad" and "ooh scientists are nasty to each other, big deal" arguments).
Just imagine that Ben Bernanke, Hank Paulson, and Tim Geithner sent out emails stating that their calculations on TARP showed that the bailout wasn't really necessary to save the economy, and that it was going in the shitter anyway. And then said they were going to have to hide that information from people who were skeptical of the claims. Can you imagine the media firestorm that would ensue for something like that?
And TARP was just a one-time event--the CRU's scientists have been influencing the AGW debate for DECADES, with their research and data sets going out to scientists across the globe and being used as the foundation for climate studies. The result has been an incestuous circle-jerk of manipulated or incomplete data disguised as "peer review" that's taken as a given, not something to be analyzed objectively.
No, I think it's a good thing that the media didn't pick up on this initially, because it eventually would have been snuffed out. Now that the info is out there for everyone to look at, there's no way a sympathetic, morally compromised journalist can mute the discussion by withholding information.
Posted by: David Axelrod's Combover at November 26, 2009 12:01 PM (1SOOm)
MSM says: "Ehhhh. Is there not anything to report on Lindsey Lohan? How 'bout Madonna? Yeah, that would be news! Sean Penn? ...hey!!! I know! We could get David Frum to say something about Palin!"
"Can we say something about Michelle's arms? How 'bout Chris Mathews twitchy legs?"
"Shit! This not reporting on stuff is hard!"
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 26, 2009 12:15 PM (r1h5M)
I wonder where that will leave us - Vostok Ice Cores and Satellite data - that don't support the narrative.
Then we need a "truth" commission; wherein all the little fish come before Freeman Dyson, Vaclav Klaus, and Steve McIntyre and beg forgiveness as they disclose hundreds of of other emails and peer-review stunts.
Posted by: Jean at November 26, 2009 12:16 PM (xCBQ4)
Just imagine that Ben Bernanke, Hank Paulson, and Tim Geithner sent out emails stating that their calculations on TARP
That could never happen, as there were no calculations for TARP. Paulson pulled the $700 billion number right out of his ass ... He was just lucky that no one bothered to really push this point at the time.
showed that the bailout wasn't really necessary to save the economy, and that it was going in the shitter anyway.
TARP was ony meant to save the monetary system, not the economy. Unfortunately, TARP has long since moved from the monetary system to the wider economic scope - thanks to the awful legislation that was forced through.
Can you imagine the media firestorm that would ensue for something like that?
Sadly, the media covered up everything about the insane nature of the whole TARP endeavor. I was very much for the Congress doing their actual job of protecting our monetary system, but they went so much further that it was criminal in how it was done and how it's currently being pursued. The media never even bothered to investigate the half trillion dollars that was sucked out of money market accounts in a half hour in September that precipitated the whole crisis. There's still been no mention at all of who was withdrawing the money to where ...
I didn't mean to step on your valid post, but I just had to mention these points, as they have both been abused in the public discussion, which is why TARP is now an all-purpose, un-Constitutional slush fund at Treasury, to use in any way they want.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 26, 2009 12:16 PM (A46hP)
Posted by: Jean at November 26, 2009 04:16 PM (xCBQ4)
The Vostok Ice Core data is good stuff. I used to use it in all of my anti-anthropogenic global warming arguments, which was great, because global warming nuts love to pray to the Vostok cores. That data clearly shows that we are at a very high volatility period in climate, though near the end of that period, and that we are headed for a cooling that would boggle the mind over the next many centuries.
Their CO2 arguments of causation for the core data are silly, at best. The temperature data, though, is positively fascinating and goes massively against the whole global warming fraud.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 26, 2009 12:23 PM (A46hP)
Get! Down!
Boogie-oogie-oogie!
"At this rate, Copenhagen is going to turn into a comedy convention with the real world laughing at these liars. Now is the time to mount massive resistance to the petty tyrants and hit them where it hurts – in the wallet. Further down the line there may be, in many countries, a question of criminal prosecution of anybody who has falsified data to secure funds and impose potentially disastrous fiscal restraints on the world in deference to a massive hoax. It’s a new world out there, Al, and, as you may have noticed, the climate is very cold indeed."
Posted by: logprof at November 26, 2009 12:26 PM (A+6fk)
Posted by: Jean at November 26, 2009 12:33 PM (xCBQ4)
Posted by: CDR M at November 26, 2009 12:39 PM (cvmTR)
I'm preparing one you can buy immediately on Kindle so you won't have to wait for shipping to see my awesomeness.
A calendar with Shamuta sweeping my garage floor in a thong bikini, Wide Ass Rose stringing my guitar in a kimono, Kilgrow adjusting my bicycle seat in a Speedo, and Manatee Manners cooking spaghetti for me naked.
Of course, pics of my sneakered foot on a bike pedal, and my hand plucking those strings
Posted by: Cahrsel Jhonsno at November 26, 2009 12:41 PM (sYxEE)
Invest in Florida real estate.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 26, 2009 12:41 PM (g35qK)
Posted by: logprof at November 26, 2009 12:43 PM (A+6fk)
Posted by: Cahrsel Jhonsno at November 26, 2009 04:41 PM (sYxEE)
Was that you k-bear? 'Cause if it was you owe me a keyboard and a mixed-drink.
Fucker.
Posted by: Blazer at November 26, 2009 12:44 PM (+FzLa)
Damned decent of them, which is more than can be said for the assholes running the show here in California...
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at November 26, 2009 12:46 PM (jV9DU)
Read Mann's October 12 email bitching about Hudson's piece at BBC, which was named, "What Ever Happened to Global Warming?" Mann wanted to know why Hudson got a story out and why one of the lapdogs at the Beeb hadn't stopped Hudson's piece.
Get it? Hudson was asking the same question the rest of us are. Since Ace posted the Mail's bullshit, the whole right side of the blogs having been making asses of themselves.
BTW, the last emails in the zip file go to mid-November.
Long and short, Mail Online can't frickin' read and the rest of you are blowing smoke about Hudson based on a bullshit story. Haven't we learned anything? You can't trust the media, check the freaking facts.
Posted by: jc at November 26, 2009 12:51 PM (ug69i)
With one friend of mine, we've just decided on a moratorium on political topics, even when writing private messages. So I'm honoring that but hoping she's reading anything I post on Piltdown Man-made global warming.
Logprof,
Actually that's PennState Mann - made global warming. (h/t to Steve Mosher @ CA.)
Posted by: jc at November 26, 2009 12:59 PM (ug69i)
Posted by: jc at November 26, 2009 04:59 PM (ug69i)
--Either one works. Especially since Piltdown Man was a mythical creature, like AGW
Posted by: logprof at November 26, 2009 01:07 PM (A+6fk)
Posted by: RobD at November 26, 2009 01:11 PM (wGIVf)
Posted by: chaos at November 26, 2009 01:17 PM (mFUln)
Sadly, PennState Mann isn't mythical. Although it was funny as hell that the Minnesotan 4GW chose him in particular to skewer with their vid of him singing "hide the decline" to the old Tommy James tune.
Can you imagine the sheer frustration of being one of that asshole's students? He probably negotiated such a cushy position that he never has to lecture or grade anything, but if he does, getting through any of his courses must be horrible. I bet it is nothing but agree-with-my-arrogant-unethical-ass-or-else, and most try to wash their brains with bleach when they finally get a passing grade.
Posted by: jc at November 26, 2009 01:26 PM (ug69i)
Fucker.
I can get you a deal for those on Kindle
Posted by: kbdajohnsonsock at November 26, 2009 01:29 PM (sYxEE)
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '<' in /home/ace/public_html/skins/1/3c-body.php on line 51
Also, an error at the top post.
Posted by: Y-not at November 26, 2009 01:33 PM (sey23)
I'm LMAO that at American Thinker there are ads by Nature Canada with the cutest of polar bears frollicking that say "Let's Stop Global Warming! Sign Our Petition Now!"
I am soooooo tempted to put a bogus name in there like Hal R. Highwater (which I have used for Not in Our Name before).
Posted by: logprof at November 26, 2009 01:34 PM (A+6fk)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was once known as the National Bureau of Standards and was founded around 1900. I do not know when NIST adopted metrology (science of measurements) standards, but any temperature measurement taken before 1900 is probably plus or minus one half degree at best. It is my opinion but I think any hardware store thermometer available now is just as accurate as what was used before 1900. Furthermore, The Instrument Society of America was not founded until 1945 when metrology standards began being codified.
Our futures are dependent on temperature values that aren't all that accurate anyway. Where are the as found calibration results?
Posted by: Pelayo at November 26, 2009 02:04 PM (wwQxi)
Posted by: lincolntf at November 26, 2009 02:22 PM (7XkqZ)
please chaos. think a little. One guy at the Beeb (and AFAIK just one guy) -- Hudson -- proves he is not an incredible dickwad by asking the obvious question -- "if it is cooling for 10 years while CO2 is going up for 10 years, why are we so convinced about AGW?"
The assholes in this sinister story pitch a fit because he actually even got a chance to speak. He gets a copy of the assholes' email chain. A month later, the zip file breaks. He checks the zip file for that one email chain that he got a copy of the month before. He tells people that. The Mail Online reporter can't friggin' read and gets it all wrong. Ace posts the Mail Online link. Insty, Wizbang, and a bunch of others follow Ace's lead.
So, in net effect -- one guy at the Beeb is not a total douche, and he gets attacked because of a misunderstanding. All the real douches at the Beeb now have a chance to point at the attacks and tell the one guy who was not acting like a douche (at least in this one instance), "see I told you so."
Now how exactly is that helping us?
Posted by: jc at November 26, 2009 02:31 PM (ug69i)
I haven't had any sunspots this entire year because I bought a tube containing 400 million metric tons of Clearasil at a Sams Club last Christmas.
Posted by: The Sun at November 26, 2009 02:35 PM (yVcTF)
Posted by: chaos at November 26, 2009 04:06 PM (mFUln)
Posted by: KF at November 26, 2009 04:13 PM (NV5UR)
Posted by: chaos at November 26, 2009 04:59 PM (mFUln)
Posted by: Joseph McCarthy's Envelopes at November 26, 2009 07:26 PM (zL+qc)
Posted by: Druid at November 26, 2009 07:52 PM (Gct7d)
Posted by: random at November 26, 2009 09:44 PM (eLppP)
I couldn't begin to explain how the global average temperature is calculated. But this guy's blog (http://chiefio.wordpress.com/gistemp/) can tell you everything you need to know about how NASA's GIStemp product does it. He even has the source code online. GIStemp baseline is 1950s-1980s temps - i.e. when it was cooler than the 1930s. After reading E.M. Smith's blog, all I have to say is yikes! The chosen thermometers used in the dataset to calculate the "global warming" anomaly have moved to the nice warm beach in recent times, away from cold, high (altitude and latitude) places. They also seem to like airports. Jet exhaust must make them warm and happy.
The GIStemp product appears to be similar to whatever crap CRU is using (if they even understand what they've been using). Bloggers who understand computer programming are beginning to decipher it now. The deciphered code will probably be more damaging to man-made global warming than the e-mails.
Posted by: cinyc at November 26, 2009 11:20 PM (jFw3Q)
random --
Actually I think it is important to accept the data, no matter what side of the AGW argument you are on.
As such, I have no issue with the evidence that there was a period of warmth from the 70's to the 90's.
The pertinent issues to be resolved before any policy should be made are:
Is that warming remarkable compared to historic records?
What portion of that warming is caused by human activity?
And is that warming something to be alarmed about?
The AGW fetishists haven't answered any of these questions in a scientifically rigorous manner. Much less explained how all the warming that took place in those decades was almost completely wiped out by the past few year's cooling cycle.
"The fact is we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't."
Posted by: krakatoa at November 27, 2009 09:05 AM (hQbvm)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 27, 2009 11:02 AM (K9f5/)
<a href="http://www.teachyourselfviolinquickly">Teach Yourself Violin</a>
<a href="http://www.bestwaystoproposemarriage.com">Ways To Propose Marriage</a>
Posted by: Richard at November 30, 2009 09:15 PM (Sg7gq)
Posted by: coach pureses at July 24, 2010 06:31 PM (5t0lj)
<p>We feel so glad that you come to visit our website.Our leading products are <strong><a href="http://www.buyghdaustralia.com/">ghd Straighteners Australia</a>.</strong>All our products are of super quality. <strong><a href="http://www.buyghdaustralia.com/2010-ghd-iv-styler-c-20.html">ghd hair straightener</a></strong> not only can straightener you hair, but also can curl your hair in fashionable styles.We also supply genuine products like <strong><a
Posted by: 888jj at July 25, 2010 10:53 PM (GxZcx)
Posted by: 888jj at July 25, 2010 10:55 PM (GxZcx)
Posted by: 888jj at July 25, 2010 10:55 PM (GxZcx)
Posted by: 888jj at July 25, 2010 11:01 PM (GxZcx)
Posted by: laptop batteries at August 15, 2010 07:48 PM (Psqpc)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2228 seconds, 423 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Admiral J. Random Dude IV, IE,PS,TMI at November 25, 2009 08:08 PM (anmms)