December 22, 2009

Harkin: It's not like we wasted a LOT of your money
— Slublog

It's nice to see Democrats telling us what they really believe, isn't it?

Harkin dismissed deals dubbed vote-buying by GOP senators as "small stuff" that distracted Americans from the primary focus of the overhaul bill.

"We have to keep our eyes on what we're trying to do here. We're trying to cross a demarcation line," Harkin told "Early Show" co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez. "On one side is health care as a privilege, on the other side is health care as a right. With these votes, with the vote that we'll take before Christmas, we will cross that line finally and say that health care is a right of all Americans."

Harkin must have been in a chatty, truth-telling mood in this interview, because he went on to say:
The senator also predicted that while a public option was unlikely to work its way back into the current health reform legislation during reconciliation between the House and Senate bills, it would be back.

"I am a strong supporter of a public option, I remain so, and I believe that sometime in the near future we will revisit that issue again and we will adopt a public option."

Michelle Malkin has a good list of which senators were able to get something "important to them" into the bill.

Isn't this a nice Christmas present we're buying for each other?

Update - Quick, who said the following?

"The President must stop gambling with taxpayers' money and get the country back on the path of fiscal sanity."
That was then, this is now I guess.

Thanks to I Heart Chomsky for that quote.

Posted by: Slublog at 07:29 AM | Comments (23)
Post contains 285 words, total size 2 kb.

1
Griffiths (D) Alabama just defected to the GOP.

Posted by: Blazer at December 22, 2009 07:33 AM (+FzLa)

2 "small stuff" Of course, silly! It's only BIG stuff when those wascawwy Wepubwicans do it! Seriously, try to imagine the reaction if the GOP had passed an unpopular, far-ranging piece of legislation with these tactics (vote buyoffs, middle-of-the-night votes, and so on). We'd be having a total media meltdown. Impeachments and recalls would be the order of the day. But when the Dems do it for us, even though we're too stupid to know it's for our own good? Small stuff.

Posted by: tsj017 at December 22, 2009 07:36 AM (4YUWF)

3 The sleaze ball isn't up for re-election until 2014. Too bad.

Posted by: fluffy at December 22, 2009 07:36 AM (4Kl5M)

4 "health care as a right"

Perhaps the good senator will enlighten us as to where this "RIGHT" appears in the Constitution.

Posted by: GarandFan at December 22, 2009 07:37 AM (ZQBnQ)

5 As a native Iowan I want to apologize to the rest of the country for the stupidity of my home state to keep re-electing this pompous POS.  Feeding him to the rats would be too good for him.  Tie him to a mound of fire ants, perhaps?

Posted by: Hatchet Five at December 22, 2009 07:37 AM (6Nv5B)

6 Is that the same Tom Harkin that said  "The President must stop gambling with taxpayers' money and get the country back on the path of fiscal sanity."?

Couldn't be the same one, could it?

Posted by: I Heart Chomsky at December 22, 2009 07:37 AM (BnI+o)

7 "I am a strong supporter of a public option, I remain so, and I believe that sometime in the near future we will revisit that issue again and we will adopt a public option." A gaffe occurs when a politician inadvertently tells the truth. Harkin just committed a gaffe. This should be broadcast far and wide, but won't be.

Posted by: joncelli at December 22, 2009 07:39 AM (RD7QR)

8 I want to see every one of these communist bastards become unemployed next year.

ALL of them.

Posted by: Vic at December 22, 2009 07:41 AM (QrA9E)

9

"On one side is health care as a privilege, on the other side is health care as a right."

This appears to be the meme.  They're grabbing on to this because they know the bill is a huge, smelly pile of shit.  "It's all okay though," they explain, "we'll get it fixed in time."

My local rag ran an editorial a few days ago that essentially said that the bill is crap, but they should pass it anyway.

I commented that the editorial staff was obviously retarded.

Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at December 22, 2009 07:43 AM (E0EDC)

10 These fucks must be counting on the short memory of the electorate and the continued support of the lapdog media.

Posted by: the real joe at December 22, 2009 07:44 AM (rFTt2)

11 The sleaze ball isn't up for re-election until 2014. Too bad.

Comrade Harkin is a doctinaire Marxist who poses as a  fiscal conservative, pro-life, friend of gun owners, etc when his name is on the ballot.  With the full connivance of the state media, of course, who scream "dirty politcs" about anyone who dares tell the truth about "Tommy the Commie".

Posted by: Hatchet Five at December 22, 2009 07:54 AM (6Nv5B)

12
Tom Harkin can kiss my ass.

When is he up for election?  Throw the bum out.


Posted by: ethos at December 22, 2009 07:57 AM (0fzsA)

13

At least Harkin is being honest about the philosophical differences between the two sides.  Harkin thinks health care is a "right", I guess just like free speech, assembly and religion.  Except those latter rights don't cost me a dime.  You can exercise your right to free speech all day long and I don't have to pay a cent to subsidize it or actualize that right.

Not so with "health care".  I will pay and pay and pay for your "right" to get a mammogram or CT Scan or prostate exam.  Doctors don't work for free and those expensive pieces of medical equipment aren't going to pay for themselves.

See the difference, Senator Harkin?  Now, please stop bastardizing our political language and lets deal with the debate honestly: as a way to ration a scarce good in the best possible way.

Posted by: Fred at December 22, 2009 08:03 AM (xWGQr)

14 Hey, it's not like that much blood would be spilled if every member of Congress were to be exsanguinated, relative to the amount of blood present in the entire U.S....

Posted by: Alucard at December 22, 2009 08:08 AM (VmtE9)

15 Hundreds of millions of dollars of back room bribes/payoffs probably will look like small stuff compared the trillions this scheme will waste.

Posted by: TheQuietman at December 22, 2009 08:08 AM (1Jaio)

16 Enjoy the ride.  FYI, there's a freeway at the bottom, so be careful not to get hit by a semi.

Posted by: Slippery Slope at December 22, 2009 08:12 AM (RykTt)

17

Health care's a right, eh?

What other right do you get fined and jailed for NOT exercising?

UATW, MF   (there's that nice sunken Vietnam War wall in DC that'll do just fine.  Bring'em in by the busloads.)

Posted by: effinayright at December 22, 2009 08:18 AM (NyXB+)

18

Wow.

I knew Baron Harkonnin was an idiot, but this is beyond parody

Until metropolitan enclaves are remediated, don't expect any changes in the American electorate or its' "wishes". Most of the FiddyTwo-ers are denizens thereof.

Don't forget Harkie was another fake Dem "war-hero"   Exemplar of that tribe

Posted by: OhioDude at December 22, 2009 08:41 AM (GKEJR)

19 Comrade Harkin is a doctinaire Marxist who poses as a  fiscal conservative, pro-life, friend of gun owners, etc when his name is on the ballot.  With the full connivance of the state media, of course, who scream "dirty politcs" about anyone who dares tell the truth about "Tommy the Commie".

Preach it, Brotha! Cut. Jib. Newsletter.

I can concur with the distinguished gentleman's opinion of "Tommy the Commie" as a resident of the Tall Corn State. Watched him swing to the right every time he runs, and it seems no one notices, every time. Voted against this guy 4 times now, still he pulls in the 60's. Grassley is much better (notice I didn't say perfect).

Posted by: Jay in Ames at December 22, 2009 09:09 AM (UEEex)

20

Yes, because we know the Republicans would never do something like this.

How about this? Admit both parties do it.

Posted by: JEA at December 22, 2009 09:47 AM (a+kMW)

21 Comrade Harkin is a doctinaire Marxist who poses as a  fiscal conservative, pro-life, friend of gun owners, etc when his name is on the ballot.

And the pussies in the Iowa GOP never bother to run a serious challenger, because his decades in Washington give him seniority on committees that throw a lot of pork dollars back to Iowa. 

(I don't think this is an Iowa-specific problem; I didn't know anyone was challenging Herb Kohl in 2006 until I saw the sample ballot because the WI GOP didn't bother to do any publicity in the Milwaukee area.)

Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 22, 2009 09:48 AM (6USny)

22

#11

"These fucks must be counting on the short memory of the electorate and the continued support of the lapdog media".
They are not afraid of the votes. They know something that we refuse to believe.

Posted by: VELVET AMBITION at December 22, 2009 11:22 AM (u/FF8)

23 200912.23c1hjh
Great everyday boot for the winter. I wear them for any outside work or just walking the dogs. Comfortable, warm and waterproof.
http://www.uggs100.com Thank you.

Posted by: Eric at December 23, 2009 04:07 AM (jAziw)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
77kb generated in CPU 0.1902, elapsed 0.263 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2433 seconds, 151 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.