November 20, 2009
— Ace I feel very bad for whatever miscreant is standing in 15 degree arc directly in front of this weapon.
Home-Made Belt-Fed Shotgun - Watch more Funny Videos
Super ginormous tank skeet:
Thanks to Blazer and Helmuts.
Posted by: Ace at
04:41 PM
| Comments (44)
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at November 20, 2009 04:44 PM (554T5)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at November 20, 2009 04:44 PM (554T5)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 20, 2009 04:45 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 20, 2009 04:48 PM (QECjC)
I feel very bad for whatever miscreant is standing in 15 degree arc directly in front of this weapon.
I have an idea who I'd like to see in front of it.
Heres a hint. Whats fat, insignificant and wheres a pony-tail ?
Posted by: Blazer at November 20, 2009 04:48 PM (+FzLa)
Posted by: steevy at November 20, 2009 04:49 PM (NP5DE)
Posted by: TXMarko at November 20, 2009 05:06 PM (U6aVC)
I would love to own an AA-12 but must make do with a Saiga 12 (a 12 ga AK) until then. Get 'em while you can as the factory is said to be bankrupt. You tube has many videos of Saiga 12s rock and rolling.
Posted by: Kyle Canyon at November 20, 2009 05:08 PM (Oxen1)
Posted by: Cyberdyne systems 800 series laptop battery Terminator at November 20, 2009 05:23 PM (+FzLa)
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 20, 2009 05:31 PM (ZP+gj)
Posted by: President Pantywaist at November 20, 2009 05:33 PM (GaTkJ)
Posted by: RicardoVerde at November 20, 2009 05:33 PM (PBTsv)
Posted by: Arbalest at November 20, 2009 05:33 PM (Ym9lj)
Posted by: steevy at November 20, 2009 05:39 PM (NP5DE)
A closer look suggests that the tracks and hull match that of the Austrian SK-105. The tracks could be an upgrade of some kind, but the hull front and upper section, just above the track, points to the SK-105. But the video is dark, so it's tough to be sure.
Posted by: Arbalest at November 20, 2009 05:46 PM (Ym9lj)
Posted by: Roach Sanderson at November 20, 2009 05:47 PM (Gzb30)
26 There are/were only a few users of the SK-105, and the Australians are not listed, so I suspect it might be a de-miled one that was sold to a collector.
Also, I don't remember shots (with 0 or + elevation) landing within 100 meters and looking like a pyrotechnic. But it's been a while for me.
Posted by: Arbalest at November 20, 2009 05:53 PM (Ym9lj)
Posted by: RicardoVerde at November 20, 2009 05:53 PM (PBTsv)
OTOH, Skeet or trap, or even hunting Cape Buffalo (with even the original 75mm L70 gun) is clearly a sport only for the most discerning and adventurous of hunters.
This is now on my list.
Posted by: Arbalest at November 20, 2009 05:56 PM (Ym9lj)
I suspect his 'feed' problems come from insufficient mechanical force [and contact] on the feed pawl. A shotgun shell isn't that much heavier than a 30-6 cartridge, but it is 'bulkier'. Just a slight tweak should do it.
The only other problem is the 'linked belt': it's obviously 'custom' since getting disintegrating links to fit a 12 Ga. shell might be a bit much to ask for. Oh well.
Looks like somebody's gonna be getting a visit from the BATF, never-the-less.
Posted by: CPT. Charles at November 20, 2009 06:22 PM (lYKj1)
The barrel's too short; the amount of force generated by the propellant gases is dispersing too early [the weapon is essentially has a 'recoil operated' feed cycle].
Put a 'legal' 18" barrel on it.
I think you'd see a world of difference.
Just say'n mind ya.
Posted by: CPT. Charles at November 20, 2009 06:29 PM (lYKj1)
Posted by: Admiral J. Random Dude IV, IE,PS,TMI at November 20, 2009 07:08 PM (anmms)
Not if they have a type 7 (or 10) FFL.
You can have one too, for $3k annually...
Posted by: ThomasD at November 20, 2009 07:25 PM (21H5U)
Posted by: rosie o'donnell's movember 'stache at November 20, 2009 08:52 PM (c+sVx)
Hmmmm..
What should I try first?
The old M60?
The newer M1?
Or the 20mm on the M2 Bradley?
Decisions, decisions!!
Posted by: hous bin pharteen at November 20, 2009 10:52 PM (pU4D7)
Posted by: Laptop-battery at November 20, 2009 11:56 PM (RehUN)
Posted by: Laptop-battery at November 21, 2009 03:56 AM (RehUN)
So, not only have the spambots achieved sentience, but now they're pro-gun control? They want us to be helpless when they take over...
Posted by: jic at November 21, 2009 04:28 AM (qIj5x)
The tank skeet shoot was bogus. It was a clever commercial, however. As a former "13-Fox" (forward observer), I've seen plenty of HE air- and ground-bursts and thats not what they look like. The "ground-burst" in the commercial was a petrolium pyrotechnic: you don't get that orange flame and black smoke plume in the real thing.
The guys with the shotgun get an A for effort but D for execution. They better have gotten the proper BATF permits or they've got some explaining to do.
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at November 21, 2009 05:02 AM (bCQG3)
I want one!
That belt-fed shotgun is too cool. Perfect for those of us with a "bunker mentality".
Unfortunately, the Army wouldn't let me leave with my Browning M-2.
Bastids. (chuckle)
~(Ä)~
.
Posted by: Rokketmania at November 22, 2009 06:51 AM (9a5ev)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1776 seconds, 172 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: CDR M at November 20, 2009 04:43 PM (cvmTR)