December 06, 2009
— Gabriel Malor Warren Meyer of CoyoteBlog and Climate Skeptic has the must-read of the day. It starts:
LetÂ’s say you had two compasses to help you find north, but the compasses are reading incorrectly. After some investigation, you find that one of the compasses is located next to a strong magnet, which you have good reason to believe is strongly biasing that compassÂ’s readings. In response, would you1. Average the results of the two compasses and use this mean to guide you, or
2. Ignore the output of the poorly sited compass and rely solely on the other unbiased compass?Most of us would quite rationally choose #2. However, Steve McIntyre shows us a situation involving two temperature stations in the USHCN network in which government researchers apparently have gone with solution #1.
As the man says, click over and read the whole thing.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
10:09 AM
| Comments (44)
Post contains 155 words, total size 1 kb.
Since the readings didn't match, install a strong magnet next to the first, unbiased compass.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 06, 2009 10:18 AM (l1Wlr)
Posted by: eman at December 06, 2009 10:23 AM (B+7+o)
Posted by: eman at December 06, 2009 10:26 AM (B+7+o)
Posted by: Old Sailor at December 06, 2009 10:29 AM (/Ft4q)
I found out that NASA is a private entity after thirtysome years of thinking it was part of the USAF or at least run by our military. These guys are turning into a bunch of goobers. Hell you can't depend on the success of WD-40 to keep you in a favorable light.
Posted by: sonnyspats at December 06, 2009 10:33 AM (ozpeF)
Posted by: Jeff Kelley at December 06, 2009 10:34 AM (9Nxcm)
Posted by: Michael in MI at December 06, 2009 10:34 AM (ObTcs)
I found out that NASA is a private separate government entity after thirtysome years of thinking it was part of the USAF or at least run by our military. These guys are turning into a bunch of goobers. Hell you can't depend on the success of WD-40 to keep you in a favorable light.
Posted by: sonnyspats at December 06, 2009 02:33 PM (ozpeF)
FIFY
Posted by: Bill R. at December 06, 2009 10:36 AM (EhlQq)
Posted by: Robert Falcon Scott at December 06, 2009 10:37 AM (mCD5S)
I found out that NASA is a private several separate quasi-government entities after thirtysome years of thinking it was part of the USAF or at least run by our military. These guys are turning into a bunch of goobers. Hell you can't depend on the success of WD-40 to keep you in a favorable light.
Posted by: sonnyspats at December 06, 2009 02:33 PM (ozpeF)
Even better!
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2009 10:38 AM (xCBQ4)
How did we ever get to the moon without miscounting tree rings in Siberia?
Posted by: TexasJew at December 06, 2009 10:39 AM (mCD5S)
Posted by: Old Sailor at December 06, 2009 10:40 AM (/Ft4q)
Posted by: James Hansen at December 06, 2009 10:41 AM (mCD5S)
Posted by: FTFY at December 06, 2009 10:56 AM (d7Px0)
Yeah, that market kinda collapsed about sixty years ago. It's all about the natural gas now.
Posted by: GreenGasEmissions at December 06, 2009 11:02 AM (ghGK6)
Posted by: GarandFan at December 06, 2009 11:05 AM (ZQBnQ)
I think you can safely conclude that Al Gore and Global Warming alarmists have officially jumped the shark once there is a "Der Untergang" spoof released on YouTube.
http://tinyurl.com/yjsu8xc
Posted by: Mr. Peabody at December 06, 2009 11:05 AM (gxVc6)
How the hell does NASA get credit for WD-40? It sure ain't theirs. And they don't get SiliconeSeal or Tang, either. Programming, kinda-maybe.
OS, how far are you from coal fields? I'm 250 miles, and all I have to do is ask around to get a trucker to bring a triple-axle load right to the place--often below market spot price, and no premium for transport. Watch for a coal truck at your local truck stop, and just ask. If you're flexible on delivery, or better yet can use mixed grades and sizes, you can get some helladeals. Plan on 500 cubic feet of storage space, though. It don't come in bags.
Heh: My family owned several thriving coalyards, once. After WWII, dad and the uncles wanted to branch out into appliances and building supplies. The Old Man said, "What are people gonna do? Put in all new furnaces?" Residential bulk coal is a PITA and subject to several layers of special local tax, plus teamsters. You can't blame anybody for wanting out of the business.
A woodstove is not a coal stove. Don't fire that puppy too hard or you'll spang it.
Posted by: comatus at December 06, 2009 11:08 AM (/VEEI)
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2009 11:13 AM (xCBQ4)
Posted by: Michael in MI at December 06, 2009 02:34 PM (ObTcs)
That's one of the best articles I've read. It's detailed and well constructed. Everyone in Copenhagen should be required to read it.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at December 06, 2009 11:17 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Reactionary at December 06, 2009 11:17 AM (4nbyM)
My father in law once said that TV would never catch on. His last job before he retired was as a VCR and TV repairman.
There's only one thing you can say for sure about the future, it won't be anything like you expect.
Posted by: GreenGasEmissions at December 06, 2009 11:22 AM (ghGK6)
My father in law once said that TV would never catch on. His last job before he retired was as a VCR and TV repairman.
There's only one thing you can say for sure about the future, it won't be anything like you expect.
Posted by: GreenGasEmissions at December 06, 2009 03:22 PM (ghGK6)
For years (from sometime in the 1950's I think) my uncle owned the cable rights from Scranton to Hazleton, PA. He used to tell me cable TV would never get off the ground. In the late '70's or early '80's he sold those rights, figuring anything he got for them was gravy.Posted by: Tinian at December 06, 2009 11:36 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Neo at December 06, 2009 11:36 AM (tE8FB)
Oh -- and my uncle owned his own electronics business, installing and maintaining every kind of transmitter, receiver and re-transmitter out there. He did the comms for lots of police, fire, municipalities etc. but saw zero future in cable TV.
Posted by: Tinian at December 06, 2009 11:44 AM (7+pP9)
@27 Yeah Neo, that is rich. Let me be a moron first, and just quote Billy Fish:
"Ootah say he also have twenty sons if you be liking boys." Obviously our Mr Schlesinger did not receive his post card.
He's right, though, in principle. These are not the prostitutes who matter.
Posted by: comatus at December 06, 2009 11:53 AM (/VEEI)
Posted by: nickless at December 06, 2009 12:12 PM (MMC8r)
8 Is this climategate thing getting any traction among the general population? Barely a peep on the Sunday shows today. Anyone seen any polls on the subject? I would love to think the wall is finally coming down, but outside of the blogs I'm seeing little to nothing.
Climategate? You've got one on me.
Posted by: Charles Gibson at December 06, 2009 12:23 PM (i0WE5)
Posted by: random at December 06, 2009 12:28 PM (eLppP)
Ah. More bullying from the consensus whores. This is fun. Just like the commintern meetings where they just stood up and plugged the dissenters at point blank range. Blood be coming to a theater near you.
Posted by: Derak at December 06, 2009 12:33 PM (j9cGY)
Yesterday on foxer, there was an interview with a "scientist", very intellectual and self assured as only intellectual scientist can be, who very scientisty told the interviewer how the fake data was nothing really (You wouldn't understand but I'm a scientist and I know these things). He kept going on about how each country had their own data and how good it was because it was totally independent of the fake stuff the other scientists, the bad ones evidently, came up with.
I wouldn't say that he was necessarily preaching from the alter of the Virgin Gaia, but I'm pretty certain that if you wanted your child baptised, he would be more than happy to perform the ceremony, naked, under a full moon with holy water salvaged from a glacier destroyed by human caused global warming.
These parents of these charlatans should sue their children for wasting their money on PHDs only to become cultists.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 06, 2009 12:35 PM (r1h5M)
That was a great article but for more fun read the comments. A climate change supporter attempted to discredit the article and over the course of a number of exchanges was pretty well logically and methodically destroyed.
Posted by: scr_north at December 06, 2009 01:05 PM (GE/dx)
[re-post]
Posted by: logprof at December 06, 2009 01:47 PM (I3Udb)
( >koff<Challenger/Columbia>koff< )
Posted by: Flubber at December 06, 2009 02:52 PM (/kVbY)
Posted by: ParisParamus at December 06, 2009 02:57 PM (cd0d9)
Posted by: Flubber at December 06, 2009 06:52 PM (/kVbY)
--Try as I might, I can't seem to find the pea!
Posted by: logprof at December 06, 2009 03:51 PM (I3Udb)
Whoops, meant to put this here:
Tangentially related, here's an article linked by Drudge today:
Copenhagen Summit: ... Caviar Wedges
And here's part of an email to Ace on 11/22:
. . .
The AGW climate Nazis have lived lives of luxury, an incredibly wealthy, extravagant lifestyle. And they've worked to build an entire culture to support their expensive tastes. I've been trying to think about some of the payoffs:
-conferences (a/k/a "parties" in exotic locales)
-flash money (per diem money)
-"research" (in exotic locales)
-flash money
-cocktail parties (in exotic locales)
-flash money
-meetings (parties) (at the best hotels and restaurants, of course) (in exotic locales)
-sabbaticals (vacations) (in exotic locales)
-flash money
-lots of other paid time off
-hot co-eds
-control over how you use your time
-"non-monetary" (tax-free) compensation
-unlimited research slush funds
They have everything billionaires have except the large bank accounts. If they want to take a biz-jet to a Mongolian desert and catch a million-dollar helicopter to a four-star campsite, while wearing expense-account obtained clothing (they get to keep), they get to. All they have to do is fill-out a form, exaggerate and embellish a little bit on the purpose and benefit, and voila, another tax-free junket on our dime.
And flash money.
Posted by: rdbrewer at December 06, 2009 04:37 PM (V7+ez)
STS-1 flew with Crippen and Young having to memorize a book of errata and workarounds about an inch thick.
The flight avionics computer I was responsible for (a Shuttle has 4 of these attached to the main AP101 flight computers) was largely issue free except for one real biggie -- the units would lock up once a month or so on average and nobody could figure out why. IBM and Rockwell staff had chased that problem ever since the Enterprise glide tests. STS-1 flew with it still being an unexplained mystery.
A few months after STS-1 flew I figured it out after a very tedious code inspection that took weeks of pouring over thousands of lines of assembler code ;->
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 06, 2009 04:59 PM (4dqrJ)
So, I go there and signed their little pettition. My name? Itsthe Sunstupid.
my message of hope? You commies die soon... we will see how well they screen.
Posted by: Artruen at December 06, 2009 05:32 PM (L+dBi)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2873 seconds, 172 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: BillyBob at December 06, 2009 10:14 AM (kCoHb)