December 10, 2009
— Ace On Twitter, I am arguing with Gabriel about Evil Corporations. I like 'em. He hates 'em.
As movie villains, I mean. He doesn't like the implicit, he thinks, critique of business and profit.
I like 'em.
First of all, let me distinguish: There is a big difference between the Evil Corporation in Erin Brokovich and the Evil Corporation in Total Recall. (Was that a corporation? I forget. The bad guys wore suits; close enough!)
Erin Brockovich and Michael Clayton and Syrianna and all the other idiot leftist productions are intended to be "serious" critiques. This despite they set up their villains with such cartoonish malevolence that Emperor Palpatine seems more well-rounded and realistic by comparison. But that's what they do -- they tell us we must show "nuance" in all things, and sophistication in art, until it's time to make their little stupid polemnics. At that point we find out that the oil companies are run by a board of directors that includes Freddy Krueger the creatures from Seti Alpha V that bore into your ears.
But I do not think that critique is present in a James Bond movie. It's not intended, really. It's a pure contrivance, and they usually don't spend too much time pretending it's anything but that.
In action/fantasy/sci-fi movies, the Evil Corporation is just this very awesome plot device. With one plot device, you get:
1) Mad resources and an unending supply of troopers with high-tech hardware. Plus the tech guys in a room full of monitors whenever you need to explain how they found the hero again (in time for the next attack sequence). You can also kill all the corporate troopers and guards without moral qualms, because hey, they are mercenaries for an Evil Corporation.
2) The ability to carry this all out with so little public outcry. Corporations keep secrets better than governments. They don't have Concerned Voters that might protest. They have a board and that's it. You have the board in favor of the plan, that's fine. (Yeah, shareholders: They're not informed.)
3) A villain of the right size to be threatening and a seemingly unbeatable size... and yet it is a beatable size. James Bond could never, ever destroy the Soviet Union. It's too big. It's unimaginable. On the other hand, it's easy to imagine him destroying the Drax Corporation, because the Drax Corporation doesn't exist. Pretty easy to imagine it disappearing from the face of the earth, as you were only playing along in pretending it existed in the first place.
4) You get to avoid making up stupid-sounding fake foreign country names. This, to me, is huge. My head detonates whenever a movie or tv show makes up fake foreign country. Worse to me than the 555 phone numbers.
5) Plausibility -- Hey, corporations exist, they do have power, and they sure can be evil. Hey -- ACORN.
6) Cool set design. Loves me some tastefully-futuristic Evil Corporation meeting rooms.
I don't know what would become of James Bond if you took the Evil Corporation out of his rogue's gallery. How many times can he have missions against the Soviet Union or North Korea -- missions which, necessarily, can't really accomplish anything, because no one's going to buy a plotline where Bond kills Kim Il-Jong.
On the other hand, he can murder the shit out of an endless parade of Karl Strombergs.
Where would RoboCop be without OCP? The Terminator without Cyberdyne? Aliens without Wayland-Yutani? Nowhere, that's where.
Here's the other thing. I know, and I agree, that Hollywood is avoiding using realistic jihadist terrorists for heavies for political reasons. I want to see such movies.
But-- here's the little secret. There's also a good reason why they're using Evil Corporate types more frequently, anyway
Now I do not mean to let Hollywood off the hook -- I can use a lot more shoot-up-the-terrorists movies like The Kingdom, and they certainly owe us a real damn movie celebrating the military's war on the bastards in Iraq and Afghanistan.
I don't mean to let them off the hook.
But those would be serious movies. Realistic movies. Note, for example, The Kingdom was a realistic violent drama. It was not a fantasy, not a romp.
When it comes to fantasy, there's a reason you don't want terrorists as your villains.
It's because they're dirty ugly uneducated lunatic-raving little bastards.
To be a good villain, the villain must challenge the hero in all three arenas of competition: Physical, Mental, and Social.
Usually all villains surpass the hero in at least one category. The Industrialist Mastermind, for example, surpasses him in intellect or power (social), but not in physical prowess. The Industrial's Chief Enforcer -- your Oddjob -- surpasses him physically, but not in the other two areas.
The villain(s) must be superior to the hero in all three areas. (Or, at least, two.) That's what ultimately makes the hero's victory surprising. (Well... surprising in theory.)
The hero must at some point take on the villain(s) in all three areas. Including the social arena-- Why do you think Bond engages the villain in Bacarrat or witty by-play or romancing his girl into bed and cuckolding him? Because he's not just contesting with him in terms of brawn, and not just in terms of cleverness, but in terms of social ability. He's going full-spectrum against the villain.
Okay: That's not always true. Some movies have a villain that can't compete in the social arena -- Jaws, obviously, is just a monster. The Aliens are just monsters. The Terminator may look human, but it's just a monster. You can't engage it. It, famously, "cannot be reasoned with."
So sometimes a fantasy movie is a pure monster-bash and skips the full-spectrum confrontation element. But much more often the villain, somewhere along the way, turns out to be a human. Or an "alien" that is human in every respect except for bumps on his forehead.
Now back to these dirty little ugly scraggly-bearded religious-luantics/serial-killers.
Imagine James Bond playing one of these flea-bitten little assholes Baccarat.
See the problem?
Okay, imagine James Bond trying to steal one of their women away to turn that woman and get information.
See the problem? 1, they have no women. 2, the ugly beasts that they might have are hideous. 3, those women would either be 1) completely unturnable, as they're just as nuts as the filthy human viruses they consort with, or 2) too easily turnable, just immediately agreeing to do whatever Bond wants to get a plane ticket out of their third-world hell-hole cavern.
Okay, now imagine one of these filthy monsters giving James Bond the obligatory "You and I are not so very different, Mr. Bond" speech.
Bond would recoil in horror, and then laugh, and then say: "You wish, baby. You wish."
These demented monsters are so hideous they almost wind up projecting the exact wrong thing: Pathos. They're pathetic. Evil, yes -- but pathetic.
As opposed to, say, Ronnie Cox in RoboCop. He's evil, but not pathetic. He projects authority and accomplishment.
Again: Compare him to the human insect that your realistic terrorist is.
Although I seriously agree Hollywood is ducking the realistic, serious war picture that shows our troops or our foreign agents as the heroes they are, killing as many of these vermin as their ammo supplies will allow, when it comes to pure fantasy romps, as most action pictures are, these low-life bastards simply don't make for good villains.
They are too depressing. They are too uncultured. They are too filthy and dirty. They have absolutely nothing interesting to say.
They cannot engage in witty jousting. Because they are brainwashed lunatics who worship a God of Murder. What the hell kind of dialogue can you have with them? What becomes of the social confrontation in your fantasy-action movie?
The Evil Corporation villain, of course, allows this. The CEO, or whatever corporate officer is leading the evil forces, will of course be a very intelligent, literate, interesting sort of guy. You can actually talk to this guy. As evil as he is, he is "Fantasy Evil." He says evil things. But his nails aren't filthy and he's not wearing a sheet covered in his own excrement.
He can be plausible, sort of. Rather than so realistic that you're like, "God, this is depressing. Look at these filthy camel-buggering animals."
Sort of the same reason that fantasy-type movies, when they need the plot device of a disease, invent a fake disease with conveniently vague symptoms. A fantasy movie doesn't throw cancer at you -- it's too real, it's too horrifying, it's too weighty for a fun little fantasy.
And terrorists, I think, are human cancer.
You can include "Terrorist-Types" in fantasy movies. It can be done. Taken sort of, sort of maybe did this. But really the guys at the end were not "terrorists." They were just a depraved old Sheikh and his hired security team.
They all were showered, they all wore clean clothes, and they all were respectable enough to easily blend into Paris society.
I'm not saying it can't be done. It's just hard, and you'd really have to be on the look-out for making your terrorists too realistic. Terrorists who are "too realistic" are too plainly evil, and seem "fake," because really, how on earth can you be that ugly, depraved, filthy, murderous, and stupid simultaneously?
I mean -- they really are. But they wind up being so ugly and evil it kind of takes you out of your fantasy-action mood.
Evil Corporations don't present you with this problem. They're just as evil as the audience can accept. but they don't smell of urine and desperation and sheep-funk. They don't bring to mind ugly and painful memories of 9/11, which is something you usually want to avoid if you're doing a modern-day swashbuckler.
Anyway. My two cents. I do see that Evil Corporations are, in fact, often a convenient method of completely avoiding real-world problems and real-world enemies. But that is usually the point of a fantasy -- escapism, escaping real-world problems and filthy real-world terrorists, in favor of a fantasy world where even the evilest man in the whole world is still, when you talk to him a bit, a pretty cool and happening guy.
I mean-- You all know you would have a beer with Burke from Aliens if you had the chance. And Hans Gruber too.*
* Okay, technically, not an "Evil Corporation CEO," but having every single one of the attributes of one, except for the actual charter.
Posted by: Ace at
06:59 PM
| Comments (376)
Post contains 1772 words, total size 11 kb.
Posted by: Y-not at December 10, 2009 07:08 PM (sey23)
Disney (Buenavista, Touchstone, ABC)
Time-Warner (Warner Brothers, New Line, CW)
GE, soon Comcast (Universal, NBC)
Viacom (Paramount, CBS)
Newscorp (20th Century Fox, Fox)
Sony
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 07:09 PM (sYxEE)
1) They've been done to death. They're the current default "bad guys", and frankly, I'm getting bored with "insert generic evil corporation" plots.
2) They are so common that I suspect that much of Hollywood is purposely casting them as villains in an attempt to move the public towards socialism. There's far too much preaching in today's movies and television as it is, IMHO.
Posted by: Siergen at December 10, 2009 07:09 PM (hu1Gq)
Posted by: moviegique at December 10, 2009 07:10 PM (1y5Vr)
Posted by: moviegique at December 10, 2009 07:11 PM (1y5Vr)
Posted by: Hans Gruber at December 10, 2009 07:12 PM (sey23)
I can tell you don't watch "NCIS." Early on, they had a recurring villain who was exactly what you say is impossible: a cultured, educated, witty, scary smart Arab terrorist. He was a much more interesting, and much more hate-able, character than the average run-of-the-mill terrorist (of which "NCIS" has had several as bad guys).
Posted by: wolfwalker at December 10, 2009 07:13 PM (br8fl)
You love domination.
Posted by: Anna Freud at December 10, 2009 07:13 PM (/gil1)
Disney (Buenavista, Touchstone, ABC)
Time-Warner (Warner Brothers, New Line, CW)
GE, soon Comcast (Universal, NBC)
Viacom (Paramount, CBS)
Newscorp (20th Century Fox, Fox)
Sony
As a one time employee of one of the above, I can tell you those corporations and their subsidiary studios have only the well being of employees in mind
Well, the employees of OTHER corporations
Disney is still known as "Mousechwitz" and "Duckau" in Burbank
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 07:14 PM (sYxEE)
Played by an actor who's best scene is when he was dropped from the 32nd floor of Nakatomi Towers.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 10, 2009 07:16 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 07:16 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Steve Poling at December 10, 2009 07:16 PM (nBrFn)
Posted by: Nightcrawler of the X-Men at December 10, 2009 07:17 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:18 PM (jlvw3)
Some of my favorite dialogue from Austin Powers:
Dr. Evil: Shit. Oh hell, let's just do what we always do. Hijack some nuclear weapons and hold the world hostage. Yeah? Good! Gentlemen, it has come to my attention that a breakaway Russian Republic called Kreplachistan will be transferring a nuclear warhead to the United Nations in a few days. Here's the plan. We get the warhead and we hold the world ransom for... ONE MILLION DOLLARS!
Number Two: Don't you think we should ask for *more* than a million dollars? A million dollars isn't exactly a lot of money these days. Virtucon alone makes over 9 billion dollars a year!
Dr. Evil: Really? That's a lot of money. Okay then, we hold the world ransom for... One... Hundred... BILLION DOLLARS!
Posted by: Andy at December 10, 2009 07:19 PM (VMyjP)
You forgot one;
Evil corporations will not show up at their homes in Malibu and slowly cut them apart with a rusty knife.
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 07:19 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:19 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:20 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 10, 2009 07:20 PM (otlXg)
You're a little whore, in other words.
Posted by: Anna Freud at December 10, 2009 07:21 PM (/gil1)
Posted by: Santa at December 10, 2009 07:21 PM (sey23)
In other words, you're stupid.
Posted by: Anna Freud at December 10, 2009 07:22 PM (/gil1)
No, but I did see a movie where henchmen of an evil Big Oil Corporation broke an employee's fingers with a whalebone club and then cut off his leg with a pipe cutter.
/That would be Steven Seagal's On Deadly Ground.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 10, 2009 07:22 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:24 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 10, 2009 07:24 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: fixerupper at December 10, 2009 07:25 PM (AlZQ+)
Plus, everyone hates their corporate boss in RL. So there's that fantasy at play as well.
{decompresses exposed Boss on the surface of Mars}
Posted by: Cuffy Meigs at December 10, 2009 07:25 PM (outBY)
If this is a reflection of how you're worried that you'll be getting a lump of coal this year instead of that pony, it's OK. We M&M's would send one to you anyway; that our way of showin' the love.
Do I need to let you know my post is full of sarcasm?
Posted by: David in San Diego at December 10, 2009 07:25 PM (GF+6V)
Sorry but I was sort of proud of myself for doing more work than usual today. Got pissy about the snark.
++
Well written. Its all good
Posted by: fixerupper at December 10, 2009 07:28 PM (AlZQ+)
"You know Burke, I don't know which species is worse; you don't see
them fucking each other over for a goddam percentage!" - Ripley
Movie corporations? Wayne Enterprizes = The Dark Knight (or The Batman)
The Browns beat the Steelers? Hell must've finally frozen over up on the North Coast. It's damn cold enough here.
Posted by: drillanwr at December 10, 2009 07:28 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:29 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: logprof at December 10, 2009 07:29 PM (I3Udb)
Sorry but I was sort of proud of myself for doing more work than usual today. Got pissy about the snark.
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 11:20 PM (jlvw3)
Yeah, I thought it was brief and concise, myself.
Posted by: Noam Chomsky at December 10, 2009 07:30 PM (ItSLQ)
Posted by: Charles Dickens at December 10, 2009 07:31 PM (P33XN)
Posted by: wolfwalker at December 10, 2009 11:13 PM (br8fl)
--Sleeper Cell, the too-brief series on Showtime, aslo had a suave terrorist ringleader.
Posted by: logprof at December 10, 2009 07:32 PM (I3Udb)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:32 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: Cuffy Meigs at December 10, 2009 07:33 PM (outBY)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:33 PM (jlvw3)
No, but I did see a movie where henchmen of an evil Big Oil Corporation broke an employee's fingers with a whalebone club and then cut off his leg with a pipe cutter.
Gotta love the Seagal. That scene kills me every time. In fact, if I see it's on I'll sit down and watch it until that scene comes on.
Posted by: Charles Dickens at December 10, 2009 07:34 PM (P33XN)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at December 10, 2009 07:35 PM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: fixerupper at December 10, 2009 11:25 PM (AlZQ+)
As far as liberals go, you can just substitute Weyland-Yutani for Wal Mart or Haliburton and get the same effect.
And as for the acid for blood superbugs, have you ever been in a Wal Mart between midnight and 4 a.m. ? Put me on the Sulaco any day.
Posted by: Blazer at December 10, 2009 07:36 PM (+FzLa)
If these Evil Corporations were as all-encompassing and as all-powerful as depicted in these movies (they must have a huge profit margin as to afford military-grade weaponry and highly trained shock troops and assassin teams), wouldn't the heroes only be able to defeat a part of them?
Hell, in the RE series, Umbrella always seemed to come back. I think this ruined the story-line near the end.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 10, 2009 07:36 PM (otlXg)
For that matter, Bin Laden would make a good movie villain. You can dress him a little better and make him a little smarter, but it would work.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 10, 2009 07:36 PM (ItSLQ)
I understand where you're coming from Ace, but I think it shows how easy it is to vilify corporations, than it is to actually create a villain that doesn't fall into a mold.
I only agree with Gabe because I'm tired of the mold. Give me something fresh and new, not another rehash.
Posted by: Eric Blair at December 10, 2009 07:36 PM (T8da7)
Even when you don't have a corporation per se you often sort of have it -- Shadow Company in Lethal Weapon was pretty corporate, although, I guess, it really was just a gang of ex-special forces guys.
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 11:32 PM (jlvw3)
--Osama bin Laden is a multi-billionaire. Let's not forget. And he does not have to report to shareholders.
Posted by: logprof at December 10, 2009 07:37 PM (I3Udb)
Posted by: Elliott at December 10, 2009 07:38 PM (bYTjt)
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 10, 2009 07:39 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:39 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: Dave C at December 10, 2009 11:37 PM (qmecx)
--I think Transcarpathia was a generic name given to that part of Austria-Hungary . . . beyond the Carpathian Mountains.
Posted by: logprof at December 10, 2009 07:39 PM (I3Udb)
Posted by: Dave C
Yeah, that's starting to really piss me off. It's sort of like attack the military by proxy, considering most if not all the guys working for "security contractors" used to be military 'special forces/SEALS' of some type or another.
Posted by: drillanwr at December 10, 2009 07:39 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:40 PM (jlvw3)
That so screwed up Jericho for me (Note - a company arranged the nuking of about 2 dozen cities to take over the government). And that was a damn good show in the beginning.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 10, 2009 07:42 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: Elliott at December 10, 2009 07:42 PM (bYTjt)
I was encouraged when movies like Saving Private Ryan, Patriot, Independence Day etc were rolling off the movie sets.... but that shit dried up fast after Iraq and we started to get Syriana, Rendition, and that gawd awful global warming flick that froze the world. (cant remember the title)
I hoping the V series starts the cultural examination of overeaching govt trying to subjeugate the populace with the cover of "we're here to save you".
Yes Im looking at you Mr Obama.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 10, 2009 07:42 PM (AlZQ+)
How about the evil broadcasting corporations like Network 23 in Max Headroom and CIVIC-TV in Videodrome ? Evil broadcasting corporations seemed to have been the rage in the late 70's and early eighties.
Posted by: Blazer at December 10, 2009 07:44 PM (+FzLa)
As is the need for every movie to have no less at stake than the future of the world.
Enough. I simply cannot relate, and I suspect I'm not alone.
Give me more thrillers along the lines of Hitcher, where one average protagonist that I can relate to faces an antagonist in a scenario that doesn't require chemical assistance to suspend my disbelief.
Doesn't have to be that small scale, but it doesn't need to be so large that the only possible antagonist must be a Corporate or Religious conspiracy.
Television shows are following the big-screen in this. It's why I never watch Leverage which is nothing more than a modern-day A-Team, except the "good guys" really are crooks, and the bad-guys are the corporations. Don't know if it's like that all the time, but it was like it on the one entire episode I watched with the wife at her request, and the 5 minutes of the second I watched before walking out of the room after telling her how it was going to play out.
I don't care how witty it is, or how intellectually or viscerally stimulating. Hit me with the evil corporation cliche, and more likely than not, I'm done.
Posted by: krakatoa at December 10, 2009 07:44 PM (n4Su9)
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus)
I've really gotten hooked on ABC's "FlashForward", but the last couple episodes they are bringing out the evil security contractors funded by the evil corporation possibility behind the whole plot of the series storyline.
Posted by: drillanwr at December 10, 2009 07:45 PM (GkYyh)
Crazed guy shoots up a daycare center. Arrested 15 minutes in. Detectives find a matchbook with the name of a corporation. Cut to Dick Cheney lookalike
You know the rest of the plot, change channel to Discovery Channel for
"Ice Truckers; This Time It's Personal!"
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 07:46 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:47 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 10, 2009 07:47 PM (9Lm5R)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:49 PM (jlvw3)
Ace = prolix - another 1000 words meaning what exactly?
think pithy! think tabloid!
oh, and tell malor to stop flouncing around like an old drag queen.
it's EMBARRASSING.
Posted by: Arsetronaut at December 10, 2009 07:49 PM (UVsO7)
I think this one splits your theory.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 10, 2009 07:49 PM (DIYmd)
kbdabear & fixerupper -
The Day After Tomorrow (same geek that made Independence Day, and the current 2012 I think). And there was a Dick Cheney look-a-like in the global warming flick that had to go begging to Mexico for our frozen refugees to cross the border into Mexico. He also wouldn't listen to the 'scientists' when they tried to warn him the end was near.
Posted by: drillanwr at December 10, 2009 07:50 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at December 10, 2009 07:50 PM (nE6Eu)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 07:51 PM (jlvw3)
That's cool. But there are some movies that did without the Evil Corporation as the villain. Such as...damn, only thing I'm coming up with is the Rambo series, with the overzealous police-chief, the Vietnamese military, teh Russians, and the Burmese military.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 10, 2009 07:52 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: Shooter McGavin at December 10, 2009 07:53 PM (cxGtL)
Posted by: Have Blue at December 10, 2009 07:53 PM (mV+es)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 10, 2009 07:53 PM (DIYmd)
Posted by: drillanwr at December 10, 2009 07:53 PM (GkYyh)
You make a good case, Ace, laying out all the reasons why Evil Corporations make the ideal bad guy. But you are overthinking this, IMO.
Evil Corporations are almost always headed up by white men, which is politically correct and easy, no protests or threats of boycotts and worse. Governments can't be the bad guys in a Hollywood movie, because governments, even if run by bad guys, are still our only real hope of solving our problems. (the one caveat is if it OUR government, run by omg, conservatives!)
So, the whole evil corp thing is PC, fits into and perpetuates their worldview, and is so cliche as to almost be expected. It's that simple.
Posted by: OneEyedJack at December 10, 2009 07:54 PM (Poe30)
Best evil corporate overlord?
Mr. Douglas, the mall developer from Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo who wanted to bulldoze the community center.
Posted by: Cuffy Meigs at December 10, 2009 07:54 PM (outBY)
Hmm, there was that Australian company in Mission Impossible 2, but I don't think they were bad, they just had samples of that chimera bug for whatever reason.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 10, 2009 07:54 PM (otlXg)
And they have the added interest of always being some kinda sex-weirdos. ...Understand?
Pre-attack strip club scene. In a movie for dudes. Even staged as an anti-dude "This is how you all really look at women, you dirty penis-people," there are naked girls in it.
And even if you leave out that scene (because you're an asshole), you have to show the sweet butts and boobs the guy sees in public all the time that get him seething. Street babe jiggle montage. In a movie for dudes.
If I ran a studio, I'd pump these shits out like Saw sequels (and use my bazillions to buy an armored island to hide on).
Posted by: oblig. at December 10, 2009 07:55 PM (Ztenc)
Posted by: rockhead at December 10, 2009 07:55 PM (RykTt)
The best part about that DVD was the voiceover between the director and Tom Clancy, who introduced himself as "the guy who wrote the book they ignored when making this movie."
Posted by: Methos at December 10, 2009 07:56 PM (zyyJm)
Posted by: JayC at December 10, 2009 07:56 PM (NRkbS)
Running Scared with Billy Crystal and Gregory Hines....... no evil corporation..... drug kingpins are the bad guys and lots of warmed bodies turned cod.
Same with Eddie Murphy and Nick Nolte in 48 Hours
Not very deep movies ... granted.... but I liked them both.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 10, 2009 07:57 PM (AlZQ+)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 10, 2009 07:57 PM (DIYmd)
Posted by: Cuffy Meigs at December 10, 2009 07:58 PM (outBY)
Posted by: Have Blue at December 10, 2009 07:58 PM (mV+es)
One irony that jumped out at me from your post, Ace: Liberals, such as those that make most movies, don't, officially at least, consider other cultures, including or especially the hate America crap-sack terrorist breeding ones, any less than ours. Multiculturalism and all that.
So it's surprising that they don't protray them now and then as erudite villains with insight that we spiritually poor, money obessed modern American's just don't have, and a level of exotic charm that makes women swoon.
In some ways, it would be a not-unbelievable portrayal. Certainly, of course, most of the cave-dwelling goat herding Taliban in the hills of Afghanistan that our soldiers are fighting, like the goat herding non-Taliban in Afghanistan, live simple, dirty, unsophistocated lives. But there are Islamists in the world with a sufficient command of their faculties to challenge an action hero; who know all the mores of the west and use our weaknesses against us, and who are able to seduce vaccuous, jaded men and women even occasionally in the west, for a time. Further, these have an array of shadowy yet dangerous skills--Saudi petro dollars, sympathetic Imams, support from a segment of our population and much it in their nations, bomb making skills, devotion, etc.
Obviously if you want to keep an action movie light-themed, you want to avoid the decapitation or mass murder aspect of the crazy Islamists, but you could play up other plots that are dangerous and showy, like blowing up monuments--heck, they do that in action movies as collateral damage all the time.
It could be well done, and it could have verisimilitude that Evil corp. doesn't have to most of us. I don't expect too see it much or soon, but perhaps when Hollywood realizes we're fed up with p.c. stories.
Posted by: RAndy at December 10, 2009 07:59 PM (GtTYq)
No, they can also be clean-shaven (literally, don't want to go there), western educated engineers and doctors who spend a lot of time in strip clubs.
The movie villain I want to see is when Hollywood portrays them as cynical cult leaders with pre-teen boys as catamite foot soldiers, acting under the discrete direction of absentee oil princes living the high life in Dubai. Watching their targets burn while in hot tubs full of Russian hookers.
I also want to see a movie in which environmentalists are crazy neo-luddites being controlled by a shadowy board of international socialists.
Suspect I am just going to have to go watch Staligrad and the Battle of Algiers over and over again.
Posted by: Jean at December 10, 2009 08:00 PM (xCBQ4)
I hear you. What they should really do is break the mold and make a movie where an evil, English speaking military is pushing peace-loving natives off their land so it can be plundered for its natural resources.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 10, 2009 08:00 PM (LtIsn)
James Bond also has SPECTRE (and now QUANTUM).
Beer with Hans? yes. Beer with Burke? fuck no. There is cool evil and there is douchy evil.
islamofascists have been secondary bad guys in recent movies (iron man and team america being major ones).
they were the primary bad guys in The Seige and Rambo III (afghanistan).
I think that, generally speaking, what makes a good one is a main bad guy who is the mastermind and then there are underlings. And that is the focus, not their station in life. If it were, then it would be designed to be making a point, whether its "corporations are evil" or "islamofascists are evil". That's when a director loses audience because there will be some who disagree with the political viewpoint.
Posted by: A.G. at December 10, 2009 08:00 PM (jBPzC)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 10, 2009 11:57 PM (DIYmd)
Are you talking about The Peacemaker with Clooney and kidman ? That was a rogue group of Russian soldiers who stole some nuclear devices. The train scene at the beginning was awesome imho.
Posted by: Blazer at December 10, 2009 08:01 PM (+FzLa)
Posted by: Jean at December 10, 2009 08:02 PM (xCBQ4)
WHY do they do what they do?
Why does Umbrella need to make the T-Virus? As a bio-weapon, it's pretty useless. What is the Annual Report of the Drax Corporation? Why does Weyland-Yutani need to get xenomorphs when they can build human replicants of super-strength and stamina?
What do these people do? How do they make any money? Who invests in World Domination? Who signs on to be "Random Dude in Cooridor who Gets Shot in Act III"? I'd love to see their Monster.com profile.
Posted by: Techie at December 10, 2009 08:02 PM (cxW4X)
Evil corporations are due more to lazy writing than anything. If they have to be used, why are they almost always American. I just read a novel called The Gray Man, where the evil corporation is a French conglomerate that pays commando teams from various 3rd world governments to track and kill this bad ass contract killer. It worked, and would make a great movie.
How someone hasn't worked the Mexican drug cartels as an antagonist is both lazy and PC cowardly. They are killing people by the thousands in Juarez and Tijuana in increasingly savage ways. That's about as good a bad guy as I can think of.
Posted by: UGAdawg at December 10, 2009 08:02 PM (O4miG)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 08:03 PM (jlvw3)
There have been a few lately.
Deathrace and Gamer
Oh and Running Man had an evil broadcasting corporation behind it. Complete with insane Richard Dawkins.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at December 10, 2009 08:03 PM (nE6Eu)
How about an evil Muslim terrorist leader who is also an evil CEO of an energy company?
Because that would be a documentary... ;-)
Posted by: fixerupper at December 10, 2009 08:04 PM (AlZQ+)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 08:04 PM (jlvw3)
I've noticed that every one of my patients hate TPC. Even those who are stockholders hate TPC.
Posted by: Dr. Sidney Sheldon at December 10, 2009 08:05 PM (xqhoO)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 10, 2009 08:05 PM (DIYmd)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 08:07 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at December 10, 2009 08:07 PM (muUqs)
Posted by: MostlyRight at December 10, 2009 08:08 PM (0aCXd)
Is Michael Ironsides always the bad guy?
Posted by: Jean at December 11, 2009 12:04 AM (xCBQ4)
No. He played a good guy in Starship Troopers.
Or were the bugs the good guys, I forget.
Posted by: Blazer at December 10, 2009 08:09 PM (+FzLa)
Green weenies co-wrote it, and then showed the world how super duper dangerous hydrogen fuel cells were.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at December 10, 2009 08:09 PM (nE6Eu)
Posted by: Jean at December 10, 2009 08:09 PM (xCBQ4)
Posted by: Waterhouse at December 10, 2009 08:10 PM (eJeQJ)
Posted by: lowest strata at December 10, 2009 08:10 PM (16a/m)
Hopefully I can get the eminent domain thing done to throw a bunch of losers off of the only marshland in Southern California to build the new Dreamworks Studio so I can produce it there.
Posted by: Steven Spielberg at December 10, 2009 08:10 PM (sYxEE)
Rambo 4
Posted by: Methos at December 10, 2009 08:10 PM (zyyJm)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 08:10 PM (gofDd)
That's why I'm looking forward to some Gibson movies where all the evil corporations are Japanese.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 10, 2009 08:10 PM (LtIsn)
In the nineties and into the early 2000s, Hollywood had a hard-on for Serbian villains.
of course they did, because the Christian Serbs were picking on those innocent non-jihadi albanian muslims for no good reason. Think Milosovich. In the Serbs' case, their real crime is being Christian, and fighting back ruthlessly.
Posted by: OneEyedJack at December 10, 2009 08:11 PM (Poe30)
Posted by: brak at December 10, 2009 08:11 PM (W5NBA)
Which brings me to my point, I want to see an evil corp movie run by mean nasty women, that has things the blow up. and car or space chase shootouts.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 10, 2009 08:12 PM (DIYmd)
I like 'em. Generally. From the more plausible, like Kerr-McGee in Silkwood, to the more 2-D, stereotypical evil corporation, like Umbrella Corporation in Resident Evil. That evilcorp was presented like fine kibuki theater, slick, with all the forms in place.
It can become annoying when the corporation is a political metaphor symbol of conservative or Republican belief. That symbol is always the same: half-baked, unoriginal, childish, bigoted, primitve-us-versus-them thinking. Sometimes I have to block it out to enjoy the movie. A good rule of thumb might be: If you're a shit movie and you know it, why try to make some profound political statement? It's weak and over-done. But they gots to be heroes, and it gets them the invites to the nicest cocktail parties. I guess, in an annoying way, that too is kibuki theater--just a form I don't appreciate.
The best ones, it seems, are either plausible or somewhat original--creatively rendered. I like the "stock character" aspect they've acquired. When EvilCorp is introduced-we immediately know or suspect a set characterstics. So it becomes a handy plot device, requiring little or no exposition. Plus, writers can play upon our expectations, and double-cross the audience.
Another very cool thing: Spoofing the stereotype.
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 08:13 PM (Kw4cI)
I think "Henchman for a Supervillain" would make a good movie, even if you'd have to be careful to avoid any Hank Scorpio references. Reminds me of the conversation about the Death Star contractors in Clerks.
Posted by: Waterhouse at December 10, 2009 08:13 PM (eJeQJ)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 08:13 PM (jlvw3)
A couple more points
Why can't the hero kick Kim Jong Il's behind and overthrow NK commies? It's a movie, after all, and so it doesn't have to show all the after math. Sure, they can't do it in every movie, but there's enough despots for a good franchise or two, I think.
Also, with Muslim terrorists as the foes you don't have to feel bad about gunning down the mooks--they wanted to try for paradise anyway!
(Yeah, mostly joking with the second bit there)
Posted by: Randy at December 10, 2009 08:13 PM (GtTYq)
Posted by: brak at December 10, 2009 08:14 PM (W5NBA)
Posted by: OneEyedJack at December 10, 2009 08:14 PM (Poe30)
That's why I'm looking forward to some Gibson movies where all the evil corporations are Japanese.
I've said before that if Mel's next movie is about a rampaging bear and all the dialog is in GRRRRR!!, then we'll know he IS crazy.
Posted by: UGAdawg at December 10, 2009 08:14 PM (O4miG)
Posted by: Cuffy Meigs at December 10, 2009 08:14 PM (outBY)
In the nineties and into the early 2000s, Hollywood had a hard-on for Serbian villains.
Posted by: ace at December 11, 2009 12:07 AM (jlvw3)
Actually the bad guys were Russians. The movie actually was attempting to be semi-sympathetic to the Serb who was going to detonate the dirty bomb in a church in Manhattan because his family was killed in a terrorist attack.
Of course its been awhile, but I distinctly remember there being a rogue band of Russian officers and soldiers who stole the nukes in the first place and were trying to make their way to Afghanistan in the movie.
Posted by: Blazer at December 10, 2009 08:15 PM (+FzLa)
Which brings me to my point, I want to see an evil corp movie run by mean nasty women, that has things the blow up. and car or space chase shootouts.
Mr & Mrs Smith???
Posted by: fixerupper at December 10, 2009 08:15 PM (AlZQ+)
How someone hasn't worked the Mexican drug cartels as an antagonist is both lazy and PC cowardly. They are killing people by the thousands in Juarez and Tijuana in increasingly savage ways. That's about as good a bad guy as I can think of.
They don't want to offend the people who transport their blow.
Posted by: huerfano at December 10, 2009 08:16 PM (BEYNH)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 08:16 PM (jlvw3)
Just can't picture Evil CEO saying to James Bond; "Now go home and get your fuckin' shine box"
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 08:16 PM (sYxEE)
They're remaking that, by the way, but it doesn't sound like they're keeping much of the original beyond the title.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 10, 2009 08:16 PM (LtIsn)
Dr. Evil: Really? That's a lot of money. Okay then, we hold the world ransom for... One... Hundred... BILLION DOLLARS!
Posted by: Andy at December 10, 2009 11:19 PM (VMyjP)
Piker.
Posted by: Barack Obama at December 10, 2009 08:16 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 08:17 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 08:17 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 08:17 PM (Kw4cI)
What ad?!?
I didn't notice since I was way down here at the bottom of comments. Refreshed and Pow!
Ctrl-alt-del'd my way out of it.
Posted by: Cuffy Meigs at December 10, 2009 08:18 PM (outBY)
They took out the nails in the thigh scene, and just had the cables hooked to the chair.
Bastards.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at December 10, 2009 08:19 PM (nE6Eu)
William Gibson, I mean. They guy who wrote Neuromancer. And yeah, the movies will be better without Mel Gibson or Canoe Reeves.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 10, 2009 08:19 PM (LtIsn)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 11, 2009 12:12 AM
Especially if she's hot, say Angelina Jolie as the evil CEO
Other than that, we got a chick comedy with Meryl Streep in "The Devil Wears Prada" ... yech
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 08:19 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 08:20 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 08:20 PM (gofDd)
You want classy villains? They don't exist. Never have. Classiness, culture, wittiness -- they're antithetical to being a villain. Look at the biggest villains of the 20th century: Hitler and Stalin. Both had the personal tastes of a successful pimp. Neither one would be interesting to talk to.
So the "classy" villain is a total fantasy. Which means you're justifying a lie -- evil corporations -- to support a fantasy. Well, if we're dealing in fantasy anyway, why not fantasize something other than an Evil Corporation? Like, say, an Evil Saudi Prince? Or an Evil Chicago political fixer? Or an Evil Scientist lying about the weather as part of a vast international conspiracy? All of those really exist.
And if you think that makes it too realistic, then hell, just go with Fu Manchu or a crazy third-world dictator or -- if it's a James Bond villain you want -- how about something totally surprising like an enemy spy?
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 10, 2009 08:22 PM (uEZYD)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 08:22 PM (gofDd)
I, like Gabe, have had it up to six feet above my ceiling with the concept that profit-driven organizations are soul-sucking vampires of the public, promoting evil because they are essentially "unmutual". In truth, if it wasn't for the organization and resources available to corporations, good ideas would be impossible to scale. There might be ipods in such a world....maybe even as many as 12 of them. Railroads might be able to reach from one town to another....certainly not farther. You could forget about chain stores, franchises, or food grown more than 100 miles away. Forget about autos, gas stations. Things could be invented, sure, but they could never "go public", raise a buttload of money, and go nationwide.
That said, I don't have a problem with a corporation being run by a madman bent on evil. For those of us who are older than dirt, it might be recalled that Dr. No cunningly hid his operation behind a functioning guano business. Diamonds are Forever (the movie) had a successful business being hijacked by the evil Blofeld.
So it depends on whether the evil emanates from the villain and pervades the corporation, or whether it emanates from the corporation and pervades the villain.
Posted by: cthulhu at December 10, 2009 08:22 PM (u+gbs)
I thought Family Guy's take was funny as hell.
Posted by: Dr. Spank at December 10, 2009 08:23 PM (muUqs)
The Ferengi weren't corporations, just moneygrubbing opportunists.
Posted by: Khan Inc. at December 10, 2009 08:23 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 10, 2009 08:25 PM (uEZYD)
Watchmen goes into a lot of detail about how the Veidt Corp makes money, and Adrian is really double-dealing being everybody's backs. Even his friends don't really know what he's doing.
Posted by: The Real Neptune at December 10, 2009 08:26 PM (muhdt)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 08:26 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 08:27 PM (sYxEE)
Ace, if it hasn't been said:
You're wandering dangerously close to Hefner's "The Playboy Philosophy" of forty years ago: tedious and self-conscious "Think Piece"stuff, obviously never run past an editor, that we all flipped past to get to the Good Parts.
As with most newspaper (remember them?) articles, I read a few paras of your latest and moved on, once I sensed Brow Furrowing and an Orgy of Self-Justification.
I detect incipient Andi and Cahrles tendencies here....
Posted by: effinayright at December 10, 2009 08:28 PM (iGCez)
blazer,
such a weak ass recovery
By "bad guys" I meant the guys actually trying to blow up the bomb in NYC, which I'm pretty sure made them the "bad guys," whether in pain or not.
Posted by: ace at December 11, 2009 12:17 AM (jlvw3)
I probably haven't seen it in well over ten years or around the time it came out so I'm plenty rusty on it. I'll have to watch it again, it actually was one of the better intrigue movies of the 90's from what I remember. I thought the hijack scene with the Russian commandos jumping the train carrying the nukes and wearing night vision with the laser sights on their rifles in the pitch dark was freaking awesome.
Posted by: Blazer at December 10, 2009 08:28 PM (+FzLa)
Posted by: Tiger Woods at December 10, 2009 08:28 PM (ZHPG2)
They're remaking that, by the way, but it doesn't sound like they're keeping much of the original beyond the title.
Posted by: Ace's liver
That was an awesome movie. A space western, of sorts. WTF? A remake?
What? They couldn't get the rights to remake Pee's Big Adventure?
Posted by: drillanwr at December 10, 2009 08:28 PM (GkYyh)
87
Personally, I await the day when blacks start catching onto this practice and demand to be the major villains (and heroes, of course - thank you Will Smith and Wesley Snipes for bringing some much-needed diversity to the Hollywood hero).
Bringing it back to Bond - Live and Let Die was, I believe, the first major film to feature an intelligent, scheming, cultured, and witty African-American villain.
Posted by: The Q at December 10, 2009 08:29 PM (pfStM)
Not just that, it's pretty hard to make scary villains out of comical dwarfs
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 08:29 PM (sYxEE)
He'll be a man that few people know much about.
He'll have daddy issues.
He'll have a comedic second in command that will always say something stupid when we need to lighten the mood.
He'll be able to threaten business and community leaders without even having to raise his voice.
He'll be oddly charismatic to the masses - only a small number of people will see through him at first.
He'll run for the highest office of a republic on a message of sweeping away everything old.
Once elected he will focus on robbing the country that elected him, all while convincing the public he is saving them from angry nature itself.
And now, for the hero.
Well, female heroes are in now, so we'll go for that.
And do throw in a curve ball, how about we give her a slightly odd, but homey accent?
She has to be good looking of course.
When not fighting the villain, she'll spend her time with her family and the common folk.
And in her first meeting with the villain she will lose, to set the stage for their second meeting.
Oh, and we'll definitely need a montage in their somewhere. Perhaps we could get this film done in maybe late 2012?
Posted by: 18-1 at December 10, 2009 08:29 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 10, 2009 08:29 PM (uEZYD)
yeah, count me as one who doesnt think quantum of solace was nearly as bad as you do. though it did need about 30 minutes more to fatten up the storyline. OTOH, it's pace kinda fits with Bond's state of mind then.
and burke is a weasely douche. I wouldn't trust him around a beer either. He'd slip you a roofie to teabag you and post the pictures on the internet.
Posted by: A.G. at December 10, 2009 08:30 PM (jBPzC)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 10, 2009 08:31 PM (DIYmd)
As someone above pointed out, how do they make money being evil?
Evil henchmen.
How do they hire gunmen and get it past Accounting?
Evil henchwomen with knives.
How do they get the Evil Scheme past Legal?
Evil lawyers.
How do they deal with the shareholders?
Threaten board members who aren't evil with death. The others are on board, so don't worry about it. Shareholders don't know anything. They stand around like Martin Sheen in Wall Street bitching and moaning like a Greek chorus pretending to be our conscience. Or something like that.
You want classy villains? They don't exist. Never have.
I disagree completely. Hollywood is littered with them throughout. How about Hans Gruber in Die Hard? That guy made the movie.
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 08:32 PM (Kw4cI)
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 10, 2009 08:33 PM (uEZYD)
Posted by: Jean at December 10, 2009 08:33 PM (xCBQ4)
Posted by: Percopius at December 10, 2009 08:34 PM (V0nbk)
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 08:34 PM (Kw4cI)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 08:34 PM (jlvw3)
You know who was really awesome that the producers couldn't possibly have intended us to like?
Garak
Gul Dukat during his pirate years was cool too.
Posted by: Methos at December 10, 2009 08:34 PM (zyyJm)
True, Veidt is more in the mold of Evil Mastermind/Chessmaster, but he uses the Corp as his apparatus.
I suppose if this were a philosophy class we could navel gaze about whether Veidt was actually evil, since he did end up uniting a fractured world.
Posted by: The Real Neptune at December 10, 2009 08:34 PM (muhdt)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 08:35 PM (gofDd)
Halliburton sent me through college, and trained me in the field. Plus, they gave me great-looking red workclothes.
All hail Halliburton!
Anyone who speaks ill of Halliburton to my face gets a Dick Cheney-size assraping, the motherless fucks.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 10, 2009 08:35 PM (hgrfT)
The whole "classy villain" trope is pure fantasy. So since we're entirely making shit up, why does it always have to be a corporation that embodies the fantasy? Hell, why not an Evil Nonprofit?
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 10, 2009 08:36 PM (uEZYD)
And Daryl Hannah was a hot tall blonde then, not a middle aged tranny lookalike
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 08:38 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: drillanwr at December 10, 2009 08:38 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 08:38 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 08:39 PM (gofDd)
Physical: Gay beats Ewok.
Mental: Lawyer beats Blogger.
Social: Do we have to go there....
Sorry guys... I know who wins..... just sayin'
Posted by: Jahiliyyya at December 10, 2009 08:39 PM (mvfNc)
Posted by: Percopius
Did you see "Black Rain" with Michael Douglas?
Posted by: drillanwr at December 10, 2009 08:40 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 08:40 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 08:42 PM (gofDd)
Bear in mind, I LOVE a good villain, but I also understand (as the people who effin' produced Star Trek seem to have forgotten) that Star Trek, and science fiction in general, doesn't go in for villains. In a science fictional universe there is no Devil. There are people who are Wrong, probably because they are ignorant, but Evil in the serious theological sense doesn't really exist.
Check out TOS Trek and you'll see what I mean. Most of the "villains" were in fact antagonists. They had goals which conflicted with those of the heroes, but in other circumstances might just as well have cooperated. This was even made explicit in some of the episodes, like the one with the Klingons and the whirly energy thing that fed on hatred, or the one with the lizard guy.
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 10, 2009 08:43 PM (uEZYD)
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 11, 2009 12:22 AM (uEZYD)
I think your point is now true, but I don't think you can use never.
Looking at modern despots you are correct, they tend to be low brow scum and villainy, even when the State Media tarts them up - like Chavez or Lenin.
But the ruling nobility of Europe certainly fit the mold of urbane and immoral. Tyrannical and philosophical. So if we are going to look for our movie villains, how about the modern ideological decedents of these princes of evil? No, these are not the despots we talked about above, but the members of the transnational progressive elite.
Crichton did a pretty good job with this one, but I think there is plenty left to go around.
Our transnational progressive primary villain could credibly;
1) Argue about philosophy and the future of mankind.
2) Justify a great evil in the name of some nebulous good
3) Put together a cabal of talented individuals to enact this evil above or within the legal structure of the developed world
4) Present a believably sized goliath for our hero to fight against.
Posted by: 18-1 at December 10, 2009 08:43 PM (bgcml)
When they do something that turns out in reality to be evil (ex. exploding Ford Pintos) its the result of a grievous engineering oversight of some sort compounded by initial institutional defensive denial further compounded by bean counters, or aggressive action taken by some mid-level executive looking to bust into a phat corporate headquarters office by scoring a "big win" (ex. when IBM was caught spreading bribes down in south America to get contract awards quite a few years ago).
Its been my experience that most of the real evil corporations generate has far more mundane motivations than Hollywood portrays. The people in the trenches slogging out the products and services aren't in position to do much in the way of evil, and the guys at the top generally recoil in horror from the prospects of bad press associated with evil actions.
Its my opinion that the transmission vector for much of whatever evil does happen is charts and presentations. As they move up the chain of command, an ever increasing "reality distortion field" starts to surround them and amplify exponentially with the "value add" Chartware Bondo and paint job each management level feels it needs to keep smoothing onto them. By about the 3rd level, all basis in reality has in fact disappeared to be replaced with Obamaesque magical thinking -- and this is when the evil starts to appear because people start making decisions that aren't based in reality anymore.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 08:44 PM (ffu3D)
The Day After Tomorrow (same geek that made Independence Day, and the current 2012 I think). And there was a Dick Cheney look-a-like in the global warming flick that had to go begging to Mexico for our frozen refugees to cross the border into Mexico. He also wouldn't listen to the 'scientists' when they tried to warn him the end was near.
Posted by: drillanwr at December 10, 2009 11:50 PM (GkYyh)
They filmed that out here. Some kids in my neighborhood were in that scene when they crossed the river into Juarez. Pretty good CGI - it was filmed in the Ro Grande up in Canutillo and looked like they were crossing into the Anapra neighborhood of Juarez, which is where a large part of the drug murders takes place. Talk about the wrong place to go to!
The idiot movie sucked dog ass, of course, but it was entertaining in a perverse way.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 10, 2009 08:45 PM (hgrfT)
Like Mustapha Mond, the World Controller in Brave New World?
Though, he wasn't all that evil, just a cog...
Posted by: The Real Neptune at December 10, 2009 08:47 PM (muhdt)
Posted by: Percopius
Did you see "Black Rain" with Michael Douglas?...yeah, that guy had the curly smile going. I wanted to smash through the screen and kill that fucker - I like villians that are just annoying to look at and when they move and speak it drives you crazy.
Kinda like politicians.
Posted by: Percopius at December 10, 2009 08:47 PM (V0nbk)
What are you talking about? Jaws had that hottie with the pony tails! She had pony tails dude!!
Posted by: Josh Reiter at December 10, 2009 08:47 PM (AGEX+)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 08:48 PM (gofDd)
Yaphet Kotto is a rightie if i recall correctly.
Posted by: koopy at December 10, 2009 08:49 PM (XllG0)
I know from personal experience that most of them are not really very interesting to talk to. And it would be torture to be invited to dinner at their sinister headquarters -- tofu and organic arugula, with no wine or dessert. Plus the whole seducing the henchbabe element vanishes if she's got hairy legs and thinks penises are a snare of the patriarchy.
But, I suppose, it's more plausible than an Evil Corporation. Let's call this a winnah and start writing a script.
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 10, 2009 08:50 PM (uEZYD)
Posted by: Tom Gordon at December 10, 2009 08:50 PM (62tzb)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 11, 2009 12:48 AM (gofDd)
I hate movies when they make some make-believe President into a superhero. It's always some statist Liberal shit. Those libs are all Stalin-fuckers.
Politicians are never to be trusted with anything more complex than a small stapler, much less a complicated fighter jet, the stupid bastards.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 10, 2009 08:51 PM (hgrfT)
The whole "classy villain" trope is pure fantasy.
Still disagree. Generally speaking, you're correct. Villains are uninteresting, ugly mental cases. But Hollywood shows us what is ideal/interesting. There are classy villain types, and there are good looking carnies--despite what you may expect. Hollywood shows us peope we want to look at. Why have a CEO who is as good looking and classy the Robert Gibbs type when you can have one who is more like Christopher Walken?
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 08:51 PM (Kw4cI)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 11, 2009 12:48 AM (gofDd)
Ah yes, I remember one of the sentiments popular at that time was wishing we had a president like that instead of Slick.
Interestingly enough, we went and chose a fighter pilot with a penchant for just that kind of speech for president in 2000.
soon the whole world will hear all of us...
Posted by: 18-1 at December 10, 2009 08:54 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: shibumi at December 10, 2009 08:55 PM (OKZrE)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 08:55 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 08:56 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 08:56 PM (gofDd)
Yeh, there were pretty much the "we just have to understand why they hate us" kinds of attitudes there.
The Gorn Lizard made me laugh, the costume was so bad I was waiting for him to stomp on a scale model of Tokyo. Kirk hurls a rock at him he can barely lift and the Lizard Guy laughs it off, then chucks a Buick sized boulder at Kirk UP the hill. Vegas odds weren't in Kirk's corner needless to say
Even when you had the Coneheads in the Menagerie torturing Pike and the Brainiac Fred Mertz and Uncle Charlie torturing Kirk and McCoy in the Empath, it was just scientists unemotionally conducting valid experiments.
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 08:57 PM (sYxEE)
Redford is actually smart about the way he goes about it though. Saw him on Hardball of all places where he basically said most of his movies have a social/political theme, but he always tries to put the entertainment value first. That way more people will see the movie and his political message will get through whether they know it or not.
Posted by: koopy at December 10, 2009 08:58 PM (XllG0)
Interestingly enough, we went and chose a fighter pilot with a penchant for just that kind of speech for president in 2000.
soon the whole world will hear all of us...
Posted by: 18-1 at December 11, 2009 12:54 AM (bgcml)
If Pullman was as lousy a pilot as McCain, he'd have crashed on takeoff.
And McCain is too stupid to make a speech like that. He couldn't even beat a stuttering dimwit social worker from Chicago.
Talk about a gold-plated fuckup.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 10, 2009 08:58 PM (hgrfT)
Posted by: Have Blue at December 10, 2009 08:59 PM (mV+es)
After World War I science was changing people's lives daily so the Mad Scientist suddenly became a prime villain type.
Evil Corporations started showing up in the Sixties but hit major trope status in the Seventies. Not coincidentally a time of economic uncertainty.
Note the rise of legal thrillers in recent years. Law and lawyers are powerful and that power is both scary and desireable. So we get hero-lawyers vs. villainous lawyers.
A prediction: if Obama's train wreck continues, we'll see more evil-politician stories, more evil-lawyer stories, and maybe a few villainous "community organizers."
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 10, 2009 09:00 PM (uEZYD)
The Mirror Universe where Kirk was a genocidal egomaniacal prick, as in our world he was just an egomaniacal prick
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 09:00 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: ace at December 10, 2009 09:00 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 09:01 PM (gofDd)
None of the wealthy liberal moonbats we've entertained as potential investors were particularly classy, nor were they particularly interested in the science behind what we're doing. The "green" angle political aspects, and financials were of interest to them.
Its a good thing our stuff can be pitched as "green" or simply based on the hard nosed economic advantage it can bring to your bottom line.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 09:02 PM (ffu3D)
Redford is actually smart about the way he goes about it though. Saw him on Hardball of all places where he basically said most of his movies have a social/political theme, but he always tries to put the entertainment value first. That way more people will see the movie and his political message will get through whether they know it or not.
So he is admitting he is a propagandist. He should make kids films, they are easier to indoctrinate.
Posted by: Percopius at December 10, 2009 09:02 PM (V0nbk)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 09:03 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 09:04 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: Knemon at December 10, 2009 09:04 PM (cDp5Z)
Uhhh, wasn't Bush Sr. a fighter pilot in WWII?
Posted by: wherestherum at December 11, 2009 12:56 AM (gofDd)
Yes, and he later got his ass kicked, not by aliens, but by a draft-dodger from Arkansas.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 10, 2009 09:05 PM (hgrfT)
Especially the "benevolent" aliens who promise peace and plenty at the UN in the classic "To Serve Man"
Posted by: kbdabear at December 10, 2009 09:06 PM (sYxEE)
I really don't like those films. The fake tech-language and fast edits bug me.
Posted by: Percopius at December 10, 2009 09:08 PM (V0nbk)
18-1 was talking about W Bush.
Posted by: wherestherum at December 11, 2009 01:01 AM (gofDd)
My mistake. I have no qualms about W, except for that inane Compassionate Conservatism crap and his drink-sailor spending. He's a decent guy, and Laura is an angel.
Disclosure - I used to consult for him back in the oil patch, and his checks never bounced, unlike many others.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 10, 2009 09:09 PM (hgrfT)
Posted by: Percopius at December 10, 2009 09:10 PM (V0nbk)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 10, 2009 09:10 PM (MelQB)
Posted by: Knemon at December 10, 2009 09:10 PM (cDp5Z)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 09:11 PM (gofDd)
In all honesty, I agree. I have far less problem with hyper-mega-corporations in film than I do with that smug Wall Street "Greed is Good" simplistic bullshit.
Posted by: Hank Scorpio at December 10, 2009 09:11 PM (yiNoG)
Posted by: koopy at December 10, 2009 09:11 PM (XllG0)
That's probably about two years away. A little more halo needs to wear off, and then there's probably a year in production before release.
anyone remember when Wag The Dog came out?
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 09:11 PM (ffu3D)
did someone just call Robert Gibbs good looking and classy?
Whoops. Strike the "good." Heh.
Truth is. He's the next Sean Connery.
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 09:12 PM (Kw4cI)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 10, 2009 09:13 PM (DIYmd)
Dive bombers. Dauntless or Avenger, I don't remember which.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 09:13 PM (ffu3D)
"Let me explain to you how this works: you see, the corporations finance Team America, and then Team America goes out... and the corporations sit there in their... in their corporation buildings, and... and, and see, they're all corporation-y... and they make money."
Posted by: Dr. Spank at December 10, 2009 09:13 PM (muUqs)
Posted by: Knemon at December 10, 2009 09:14 PM (cDp5Z)
There for awhile Ice-T was cleaning up.
Snipes made a pretty good villain in New Jack City. Smart, ruthless, suave (when necessary). Everything an evil overlord needs. Too bad for him that shit doesn't fly with the IRS.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 10, 2009 09:14 PM (LtIsn)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 09:14 PM (gofDd)
Yes in order to have a plausible villain you need an entity that is simultaneously vulnerable enough to be capable of being destroyed by a single hero, and strong enough to have sufficiently deep pockets to make it difficult for the hero to succeed. Those criteria can plausibly be satisfied by an Evil Corporation, but it can also be plausibly satisfied by any group of people with means. I want to see the James Bond movie where he has to infiltrate a university in order to stop the mad scientist, under the direction of a deranged university dean, from building a superweapon underneath the football stadium. Why don't you see that movie?
Posted by: chemjeff at December 10, 2009 09:15 PM (F+U5/)
Yes, and he later got his ass kicked, not by aliens, but by a draft-dodger from Arkansas.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 11, 2009 01:05 AM (hgrfT)
Don't forget the role of Mr Charts in that debacle.
Hey, think Hollywood would be interested in making a movie about a crazy *businessman* who was so personally PO'd at the president he'd run against him and get Boss Hog elected president?
Posted by: 18-1 at December 10, 2009 09:15 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: TexasJew at December 10, 2009 09:15 PM (hgrfT)
251
Ironically, Wag the Dog was a book written about Bush Sr.
But the movie came out at the perfect time.
Posted by: The Q at December 10, 2009 09:16 PM (pfStM)
Posted by: Knemon at December 10, 2009 09:16 PM (cDp5Z)
Nothing inherently wrong with that.
What about "On the Waterfront?" That's entertaining propaganda in exactly the sense Redford's talking about.
Hell, "Bob Roberts," while an enormous fuck-you to the right, is (I maintain) actually a pretty damn funny movie. (Ray Wise! Gore f'n Vidal in [unintentional?] self-parody mode! Jack Black!)
P: He is a great film maker, but I don't respect subliminal messages, it means the idea is so weak it needs to be transmitted in a disguise.
Posted by: Percopius at December 10, 2009 09:16 PM (V0nbk)
Posted by: Knemon at December 10, 2009 09:17 PM (cDp5Z)
Yea, that shit is weak. In general, Hollywood portrayals of technical details is pathetic.
You would think they'd hire some engineer or scientist to consult on some of the dialog too. 99% of it is completely whacked.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 09:17 PM (ffu3D)
Hey, think Hollywood would be interested in making a movie about a crazy *businessman* who was so personally PO'd at the president he'd run against him and get Boss Hog elected president?
Posted by: 18-1 at December 11, 2009 01:15 AM (bgcml)
Ross Perot is lower than a sea slug.
Still, GHW Bush totally raped Reagan's great legacy. Read "The Age of Reagan", pt. 2. Total RINO with a resume.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 10, 2009 09:18 PM (hgrfT)
Posted by: Have Blue at December 10, 2009 09:18 PM (mV+es)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 10, 2009 09:18 PM (DIYmd)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 10, 2009 09:19 PM (gofDd)
Yeah, there was one fight scene in the 3rd one that actually made me a little dizzy the editing was so fast.
Posted by: koopy at December 10, 2009 09:19 PM (XllG0)
Yea, that shit is weak. In general, Hollywood portrayals of technical details is pathetic.
You would think they'd hire some engineer or scientist to consult on some of the dialog too. 99% of it is completely whacked.
P: Yeah, like trying to kill a giant alien spaceship with sidewinder air to air missles. Or trying to kill Godzilla with mavericks. Or when they say Infra Red vision, and its a starlight scope or thermal (or visa versa).
Posted by: Percopius at December 10, 2009 09:21 PM (V0nbk)
Women want to take over the world cause men have fucked it up so badly. Women employ some evil henchmen to infiltrate the male dominated world but the henchman might have some ulterior motives of their own so the misogynists come in and save the day and the women swoon all over how totally awesome they are.
Totally. Awesome. Movie.
Posted by: Stephanie at December 10, 2009 09:21 PM (hGYL3)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 11, 2009 01:19 AM (gofDd)
I can't watch Robin Williams movies. A longtime dislike of him - in fact, I catch myself wishing that Pam Dawber would show up on screen to stop my misery.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 10, 2009 09:21 PM (hgrfT)
The original villain in Point of Impact was a Blackwater-type PMC that did some really nasty things for the government in El Salvador in order to force the commie guerrillas to the peace table. They're described as "Atrocities-R-Us" at one point (I think it's even by the main villain himself). The complexity is that they're the typical mercenary villains who massacre villagers....but the massacre is a calculated measure to bring about peace, not even victory, just an end to the civil war. You could argue that they are actually the good guys.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 10, 2009 09:22 PM (9Lm5R)
Women want to take over the world cause men have fucked it up so badly. Women employ some evil henchmen to infiltrate the male dominated world but the henchman might have some ulterior motives of their own so the misogynists come in and save the day and the women swoon all over how totally awesome they are.
Totally. Awesome. Movie.
P: I fucking love the Flint movies.
Posted by: Percopius at December 10, 2009 09:24 PM (V0nbk)
278 And the filmmakers replaced it with the tired old "oil company hires mercenaries to slaughter natives to protect it's oil pipeline".
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 11, 2009 01:22 AM (9Lm5R)
Hell, if it were my pipeline, I'd shoot the bastards too.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 10, 2009 09:25 PM (hgrfT)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at December 10, 2009 09:26 PM (P33XN)
Posted by: Zap Rowsdower (rdb) at December 10, 2009 09:26 PM (Kw4cI)
Posted by: koopy at December 10, 2009 09:26 PM (XllG0)
A handful of websites will give you the gist of almost any technology and the lingo that goes along with it.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 09:28 PM (ffu3D)
Posted by: Stephanie at December 10, 2009 09:29 PM (hGYL3)
A handful of websites will give you the gist of almost any technology and the lingo that goes along with it.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 11, 2009 01:28 AM (ffu3D)
You're welcome. Just don't search for any emails that aren't yours...ok?
Posted by: Al Gore at December 10, 2009 09:29 PM (bgcml)
Well, compared to a coked up rabid wildebeast, I suppose he is.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 09:31 PM (ffu3D)
A handful of websites will give you the gist of almost any technology and the lingo that goes along with it.
P: Exactly. All you have to do is copy reality. They think they have to modify everything for impact in the film format. Bullshit. They are just fucking lame most of the time. It kills it for me. Like a sub captain saying 'Fire!' when he want to launch a torpedo. Like your going to yell fire on a sub.
Posted by: Percopius at December 10, 2009 09:34 PM (V0nbk)
Well, compared to a coked up rabid wildebeast, I suppose he is.
Throw a face booger in that description, and you got yourself a point.
Posted by: Zap Rowsdower (rdb) at December 10, 2009 09:37 PM (Kw4cI)
Posted by: chemjeff at December 10, 2009 09:38 PM (F+U5/)
Also, if you like Coburn, try "What Did You Do In the War, Daddy?" Flint, Carroll O'Connor, Harry Morgan, Aldo Nova... awesomely entertaining comedy war movie.
Posted by: Stephanie at December 10, 2009 09:49 PM (hGYL3)
The G'ould in that SG-1 documentary series were pretty good, although I don't believe for a minute we really defeated them. I think they're running the Government now.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 09:52 PM (ffu3D)
Posted by: fartbubble at December 10, 2009 09:52 PM (cBeTr)
Real Genius had the evil university. Well, the professor, anyway. Of course, they had evil government too.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 10, 2009 09:53 PM (LtIsn)
Yeah, but the Apocalypse Now ending was lame.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 10, 2009 09:54 PM (LtIsn)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 09:55 PM (ffu3D)
Once I saw a study that looked at murders by evil corporate executives in movies and on TV versus actual murders committed by corporate executives. Fiction beat reality in one particular year 6000 something to zero.
In my personal experience I have found no group of people more honest or caring than Fortune 500 executives. If you try to climb the corporate ladder through deceit and fraud, someone will eventually saw a rung from beneath your feet. There is payback built into the system. Seeing movies depicting executives as villains drives me crazy.
Now a movie showing an ex-vice president plotting to take over the world with a phony environmental scheme or some college professors cooking their research by poisoning baby harp seals to get more research money while porking COEDS, or some news types doing favors to evil lizard aliens to promote their careersÂ…that would be believable.
Posted by: VooDoo at December 10, 2009 09:58 PM (WGGsV)
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 11, 2009 01:54 AM (LtIsn)
true, especially after all that had happened in the story
Posted by: fartbubble at December 10, 2009 09:59 PM (cBeTr)
Real Genius was a comedy, dude.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 10, 2009 10:04 PM (F+U5/)
One of my favorite female villians was from James Bond - her name was Xenia Onatopp - she seduced an unsuspecting, and very excited, guy into her bed, sheÂ’d crush him to death with her powerful thighs. NSFW ish sort of .....still the awesome
http://tiny.cc/AJZ9K
Posted by: paranoid polly at December 10, 2009 10:04 PM (r7Vc3)
Posted by: logprof at December 10, 2009 10:06 PM (I3Udb)
Then the movie basically ruined it when they replaced the Arab terrorists with "generic Nazis". After all, who doesn't hate Nazis and the left has managed to push the meme that Nazism is "right wing".
Posted by: Vic at December 10, 2009 10:20 PM (CDUiN)
Not a corp. but definitely a evil organization with a head mastermind.
Posted by: B. A at December 10, 2009 10:24 PM (P2NCA)
Most of the Phil Dick short stories that Hollywood took to screen were badly butchered by the writers too (Minority Report wasn't too badly botched). Seriously, Dick was a master SciFi writer. Visionary in fact. You can't improve on anything he wrote by fucking with the characters or story arc, you can only make it worse.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 10:34 PM (ffu3D)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 11, 2009 02:34 AM (ffu3D)
A Scanner Darkly wasn't bad. Be better if they didn't go the rotoscope route though
Posted by: fartbubble at December 10, 2009 10:36 PM (cBeTr)
Posted by: Gregory at December 10, 2009 10:41 PM (cjwF0)
Where do I get me summa that?
Posted by: Gregory at December 11, 2009 02:41 AM (cjwF0)
nope, never made the jump to the silver screen though it has been talked about since the book came out. Would love to see it.
Stuck with the videogames.
Posted by: fartbubble at December 10, 2009 10:45 PM (cBeTr)
"Currency traders be warned. Japan could very well step into the currency markets any time now according to a December 10th note from Morgan Stanley.Yen intervention risk is rising, and is now in the 'red zone', implying more than a 30% chance of intervention:"
Posted by: curious at December 10, 2009 10:48 PM (p302b)
"This despite they set up their villains with such cartoonish malevolence that Emperor Palpatine seems more well-rounded and realistic by comparison."
Thin Ice, Furboy. Thin. Ice. Just stick to banging your bongo drums and copulating. Stay with what you know and let us evil megalomaniac types handle the "theory of evil megalomania as portrayed on the screen" type stuff.
Posted by: Emperor Palpatine at December 10, 2009 10:51 PM (wgLRl)
Posted by: Jehu at December 10, 2009 10:52 PM (4ZYu5)
Major pooch-screwing on that one. The protocol officer assigned to this trip should be fired. Anyone who has ever dealt with the Japanese knows that you don't issue flat out refusals like that. You must leave them room to save face, which didn't happen here.
One of the "code phrases" for turning something down in a face saving manner is "difficult". You say something like: "The president would love to speak with you, and we will try to fit you in, but it may be difficult due to preexisting schedules and commitments".
Difficult == Impossible/Fuck Off
This "code" is also symmetric when it comes to anything they're telling you.
Impossible/Fuck Off == Difficult.
When they say accomplishing something may be "difficult", they're really telling you its impossible or won't happen. Americans typically interpret "difficult" to mean "possible" or "will happen with added effort/funds".
This little language nuance has caused no end of problems for neophyte American businessmen who deal with Japan. Once you understand it, its no big deal, but when you don't it can be maddening.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 11:20 PM (ffu3D)
But such a film isn't likely to get backing in the current climes. Though maybe it could. There's a few good writers out there of conservative leanings. They don't seem to hardly ever get legs tho. 24 and NCIS are rare examples, but even they have their liberal pinnings.
Ah well.
Posted by: Schlippy at December 10, 2009 11:50 PM (hYq6q)
This, of all things, was less to me than the premise of Star Trek, where 99% of aliens are amazingly humanoid, with exception of unusual shades of skin and various configurations of head ridges.
Meanwhile for some reason I dig LoTR and sich
Posted by: Schlippy at December 10, 2009 11:53 PM (hYq6q)
Plenty of learned tangos, Ace. Mohammed Atta was a school-trained architect and everything. The best tangos are the ones that blend in. The muscle are always stupid, and the wise commander keeps the specialist and the muscle seperated until the last minute.
Evil corporations, while once a finely honed instrument of futuristic fantasy, are now sadly relegated to dime-store bad guy. Which is a shame, considering their once great influence.
Posted by: flashoverride at December 11, 2009 12:03 AM (EwE2i)
Posted by: Gregory at December 11, 2009 12:06 AM (cjwF0)
Retoo's, but they were also invisible. I think the humanoid thing is usually a costume expediency to avoid having to develop expensive/intricate articulated props and avoid time intensive CGI. The Nox were easy - put some twigs/grass/glitter in their hair and presto you got a Nox.
If you're doing a weekly series, and it takes a month of computer time to generate CGI for a show, that won't work. Series format puts production constraints on that a feature doesn't.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 11, 2009 12:36 AM (ffu3D)
Watching US forces take out terrorist scum in Blackhawn Down was pretty darn entertaining. Especially the part where the Little Bird uses the rooftop full of gunmen as a shooting gallery.
I actually got to meet Colonel McKnight at a Reserve convention in PA. Even got his autograph. He looks nothing like Tom Sizemore and is a pretty humble guy. He hates the movie, states that he didn't do anything that "any other soldier would do."
Posted by: Xoxotl at December 11, 2009 01:18 AM (j88uA)
Posted by: ace at December 11, 2009 01:33 AM (jlvw3)
Posted by: ace at December 11, 2009 01:38 AM (jlvw3)
Posted by: Colonel Kanye Trautman at December 11, 2009 01:49 AM (SwkdU)
"Derka-derka-Mohammad-Jihad!"
Yes, I realize that it's a way-over-the-top comedy....
Posted by: Xoxotl at December 11, 2009 01:59 AM (j88uA)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 11, 2009 02:34 AM (ffu3D)
I liked The Man In The High Castle very much. Basically an alternative history read where Japan and Germany win WWII and divide up the world and America between them. The Japanese are portrayed as the lesser of two evils and are into kind of a cold war with the Germans. Some of the descriptions in the book of Nazi tactics and the Nazis themselves are quite chilling.
"The Man" himself is talked about throughout the book as kind of a mysterious John Galtish figure who lives and operates with impunity from a compound somewhere in the Rocky Mountains and you don't get a glimpse of him until the end.
At any rate, an interesting read and not a long one either.
Posted by: Blazer at December 11, 2009 02:04 AM (+FzLa)
Act 1 scene 1 should be the courtroom scene where the evil corporation is taken down for all of it's worth, the rest of the movie is all the aftermath.
Oh, and you can't forget the feeling, caring progressive government taxing the shit out of the settlements either, and then closing the local aid offices because there isn't enough money to serve the "rural communities" because it's all being used in the progressive urban areas.
You can set it in Detroit. It has the whole wasteland feel going for it.
Posted by: GreenGasEmissions at December 11, 2009 02:53 AM (ghGK6)
From Wilson through FDR, our federal government completed its incorporation into a Marxist incubator.
We're past the point of attributing the radical left monopoly in power today with concerns either for Constitutional foundation, dismissed by Wilson, or for concerns regarding unalienable human rights, also dismissed by Wilson as non-existant. Leftist monopoly agenda is written within their legislation, time and again, spelling out the authoritarian feudal order to own the mass population of slaves. The enslavement is always presented as "protection".
Read California Conservative, interview with Michelle Bachmann about H.R. 4173, the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009.
According to the legislation's language in Section 1101, the “Council and the Board are authorized to receive, and may request the production of, any data or information from members of the Council, as necessary (1) to monitor the financial services market place to identify potential threats to the stability of the United States financial system.” The “Council and Board” are allowed to demand information from financial institutions without getting a search warrant.
This legislation would codify into law a bailout clause. She pointed me towards a document that the House GOP leadership put together titled “10 Reasons to Oppose H.R. 4173.” That document quotes Rep. Brad Sherman, (D-Calif.), as saying this:
The bill establishes a permanent bailout authority or, as Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) described it, “TARP on steroids.”
In other words, this legislation authorizes the president to spend money without going through the appropriations phase. That means that it eliminates Congress from debating the merits of whether the money should be spent.
Posted by: maverick muse at December 11, 2009 03:05 AM (+CLh/)
In Hans Gruber's case, his plan came asunder not through any mistake of his own. He had the misfortune of capturing a building containing the most bad-ass cop ever. Had it not been for that, his plan would have likely succeeded.
Posted by: Steve L. at December 11, 2009 03:45 AM (Gkhxf)
Posted by: sporadic small arms fire at December 11, 2009 03:53 AM (dP6Ky)
Posted by: gjz at December 11, 2009 04:24 AM (GdqSP)
Posted by: lobster boy at December 11, 2009 04:42 AM (4Kl5M)
Gotta do some real work, so I haven't read every post (just 100 or so), but I tend to agree that evil corporations have been done to death. Yeah, you have a lot of mileage in them plotwise, but it's becoming so cliched that when the big reveal is an evil corporation behind everything, it just leads to eye rolls. How about a plot twist where an evil corporation turns out to actually be on the good side, and some unexpected villian is casting the corporation as evil for some red on red action between it and the hero?
Also, the story doesn't necessarily have to be man vs. man. I see a jihadist movie as being more man vs. nature, similar to a zombie movie or something. You're not there to match wits with terrorists, your there to kill them before they kill you, or to survive the onslaught until escape or reinforcements. Apart from the whole "honorable opposing field commander" subplot, We Were Soldiers took this approach.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at December 11, 2009 04:49 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: Corona at December 11, 2009 04:53 AM (woZIc)
Posted by: BKWillis at December 11, 2009 04:55 AM (nLMhW)
Exploding camel-jockeys or soldiers without vowels in their names would ensue. Commandos/black helicopters/high-tech weaponry courtesy of insane dictator of choice.
James Bond was often good for this kind of thing, unless it was one of the fruity Roger Moore movies.
Posted by: Winston Smith at December 11, 2009 04:58 AM (BFqyO)
Also, in Ironman (movieverse) the Stark Corporation is both the villian and the hero. I found that interesting, that Jebidah's actions were plainly against what Tony and his father wanted. Tony's hero's journey is in realizing that he needs to stop mouthing peace through superior firepower and start actually doing it.
Didn't the Jack Ryan, Jr. Clancy novel have part of it's plot the whole Muslim extremism being manipulated by someone who didn't give a shit about the ideology but was using that as a handy way to destablize the world?
Posted by: alexthechick at December 11, 2009 05:20 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: Farmer Joe at December 11, 2009 05:24 AM (z4es9)
Ace,
Have you gone on the wagon?
Have you stopped smoking?
Had a sex change operation?
Got a new prescription of Ritalin?
What's with these LONG posts?
Posted by: Kemp at December 11, 2009 05:30 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 11, 2009 05:33 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at December 11, 2009 05:52 AM (pZEar)
My favorite episode of Simon and Simon brilliantly subverted this trope. Downtown Brown asks the boys to help out his TV reporter girlfriend who’s working on a story about a poor schlub being “harassed” by a development company that’s trying to take his house. Turns out the schlub is actually a creepy stalker with a shrine to the reporter and the company was just trying to offer fair market value for his place.
Posted by: Simon Oliver Lockwood at December 11, 2009 06:02 AM (VE5vJ)
Posted by: Dora Suarez at December 11, 2009 06:04 AM (0/Svj)
My question to Hollywood; is there EVER a good guy developer?
Posted by: Vic at December 11, 2009 06:04 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: SlightlyAjar at December 11, 2009 06:14 AM (Ow8zp)
Ace, I love this post. I dig where you're coming from. I love the old Bond movies (though I'll have to disagree on YOLT) and that whole mystique but the fly in the ointment is that nobody is playing this stuff up 80s action movie style. EvilCo with its evil military contractors always seems either through familiarity with the trope and the awful uses of it or through just modern ham-handed nonsense writing to not be played up for the pulp evil but instead as jabs at capitalism.
The problem, I'd say, is not with evil corps but just crappy writers.
That said, I went into I, Robot with Will Smith knowing nothing and I respected it for its turnabout of who the TRUE VILLAIN was.
Posted by: SlightlyAjar at December 11, 2009 06:21 AM (Ow8zp)
Posted by: Captain Atom at December 11, 2009 06:32 AM (2BCph)
Real Genius asserted that the highest-IQ people in university are simultaneously the most humane people and the best students of diplomacy and military history; and based on that ought to act as a veto on the State's executive power.
Val Kilmer should have stayed in his dorm with his penis-stretcher.
Posted by: Zimriel at December 11, 2009 06:33 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Darth Vader at December 11, 2009 06:38 AM (UqJ8A)
Real Genius sucked. War Games was another one of this "if we only listened to the hippy genius he would save us all" schticks.
The comedies of the 80's even followed this genre. In Caddyshack, the evil guy was a rich white guy, the heroes seduced his daughter, beat him socially (Chevy Chase) and his own game of golf at the end.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 11, 2009 06:48 AM (SqAkN)
True. But he was less terrorist and more bank robber. A bank robber with a big crew, and a lot of ordinance. In fact:
Joseph Takagi: You want money? What kind of terrorists are you?
Hans Gruber: Who said we were terrorists?
...
Holly Gennero McClane: After all your posturing, all your little speeches, you're nothing but a common thief.
Hans Gruber: I am an exceptional thief, Mrs. McClane. And since I'm moving up to kidnapping, you should be more polite.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at December 11, 2009 07:17 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Dora Suarez at December 11, 2009 07:25 AM (0/Svj)
My question to Hollywood; is there EVER a good guy developer?
Eh, sort of. In 'Caddyshack', Rodney Dangerfield is the obnoxious nouveau-riche businessman who's on the protagonists' side. He's put in a lumber yard next door to the golf course and threatens to buy the whole country club as a way of taunting the villain, Judge Smails (Ted Knight).
Posted by: BKWillis at December 11, 2009 07:28 AM (nLMhW)
I guess technically you could say yes, but the movie portrayed him as a bumbling buffoon.
Posted by: Vic at December 11, 2009 07:36 AM (CDUiN)
If Hollywood is to be believed, succcessful American corporations spend their every waking moment plotting acts of immeasurable villainy against innocents around the globe....
....and Islam is a largely misunderstood (and unfairly maligned) "religion of Peace."
Posted by: Sam Adams at December 11, 2009 07:53 AM (GkYyh)
It's a pattern of the Blame-America-First Brigades.
Constantly demonizing Americans and American corporations allows us to ignore the numerouss real threats facing our nation.
Posted by: Sam Adams at December 11, 2009 07:55 AM (GkYyh)
It is interesting to see how far in advance the left softens up the battefield. In Watchmen there is a real evil general who bore an uncanny resemblence to Gen. Petraeus.
Posted by: motionview at December 11, 2009 08:04 AM (DtSf1)
I think that the only way we'll ever see "terrorists" portrayed accurately as villains in a Hollywood movie would be if they matched them up against an innocent Afghan tribesman - sort of "primitive screwhead vs. righteous primitive screwhead".
Its kindof how they did "Apocalypto", and you could also say that "Army of Darkness" is also a "Regular Joe vs. Primitive Screwheads" movie, even though it is mainly a Sam Raimi Horror-Comedy.
Another movie I remember as doing a good job of matching up a "Western Man" vs. "Primitives" was The Naked Prey.
Posted by: Russ from Winterset at December 11, 2009 08:05 AM (7n7Br)
Posted by: U.S.S. Yorktown at December 11, 2009 08:16 AM (5RlWq)
And, of course, the left couldn't make an anti-war movie that anyone would go see, so they had to come up with a proxy in Avatar. Cameron's a raging pinko, remember drowning the poor in Titanic , not killing people in T2 ?
Posted by: motionview at December 11, 2009 08:20 AM (DtSf1)
Posted by: Solo4357 at December 11, 2009 09:26 AM (q4NLr)
Posted by: ace at December 11, 2009 11:30 AM (jlvw3)
Posted by: ace at December 11, 2009 11:36 AM (jlvw3)
Posted by: ace at December 11, 2009 11:52 AM (jlvw3)
Posted by: ace at December 11, 2009 11:54 AM (jlvw3)
Posted by: ace at December 11, 2009 12:00 PM (jlvw3)
Posted by: ace at December 11, 2009 12:03 PM (jlvw3)
As a rule, I think it's fair to say a movie seems cliched and tired when it's NOTHING but one cliche after another.
One exception. Kinda rare, I guess. When the movie is inadvertently funny. The first one that comes to mind is Ghost Dog with Forest Whitaker. I swear, that movie is so funny sometimes it's hard to know whether it's meant to be.
Posted by: Zap Rowsdower (rdb) at December 11, 2009 01:11 PM (Kw4cI)
Posted by: where can i purchase an iphone at December 14, 2009 05:21 AM (S4a/k)
I am not up on my Trek lore, but should this be spelled Ceti Alpha V? As in the brightest star seen from Earth of the southern constellation of Cetus, the Whale? The star otherwise known as Menkar or Menkab?
Posted by: John Wright at December 18, 2009 09:29 AM (28B22)
Say what you want about The Shield, it had villains that fit the specs people have mentioned here. They had the foot-chopping psycho Armenians, and the cartels in the form of Armadillo Quintero, one of the biggest complete monsters ever to grace the television.
Posted by: GamerFromJump at December 22, 2009 09:24 AM (CJSHw)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2353 seconds, 504 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Yeah, but in Aliens the company man Burke was the real bad guy.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 10, 2009 07:07 PM (LtIsn)