November 24, 2009
— DrewM Not just any terrorist but a so-called High Value Target who was responsible for Kos' favorite murder of Blackwater employees in Fallujah back in '04.
The three, all members of the Navy's elite commando unit, have refused non-judicial punishment — called an admiral's mast — and have requested a trial by court-martial.Ahmed Hashim Abed, whom the military code-named "Objective Amber," told investigators he was punched by his captors — and he had the bloody lip to prove it.
Now, instead of being lauded for bringing to justice a high-value target, three of the SEAL commandos, all enlisted, face assault charges and have retained lawyers.
Matthew McCabe, a Special Operations Petty Officer Second Class (SO-2), is facing three charges: dereliction of performance of duty for willfully failing to safeguard a detainee, making a false official statement, and assault.
Petty Officer Jonathan Keefe, SO-2, is facing charges of dereliction of performance of duty and making a false official statement.
Petty Officer Julio Huertas, SO-1, faces those same charges and an additional charge of impediment of an investigation.
As an added bit of poetry, the three will be arraigned on, wait for it, December 7th.
Maybe there's more to it than this but a bloody lip? We are charging three American heroes with giving a terrorist responsible for the murders of four Americans a bloody lip?
I know that the men and women who volunteer to serve our nation in time of war do so for many reasons, including a great sense of patriotic duty but it wouldn't surprise me if many of them decide to take an off-ramp from the military in the next few years.
Loyalty is a two way street but right now it seems a Muslim Army doctor communicating with al Qaeda gets more of the benefit of the doubt than three Navy SEALS on the front line.
As I said, there may well be more to it than this but I fear there's not.
Added: Jack Murtha just emailed to say,
This guys are cold blooded smackers and I won't rest until they are given the death penalty. Coincidentally, the executions will take place in my district after we build a prison and death chamber with a 7 billion dollar earmark I am inserting in next year's budget.
Also, Andrew Sullivan emails to ask if there are any pictures, preferably with Abed naked and tied down with leather straps to something. He says it's just research.
I may have made those emails up. Who is to say?
Posted by: DrewM at
11:34 AM
| Comments (164)
Post contains 442 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: David at November 24, 2009 11:37 AM (T8c0z)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at November 24, 2009 11:37 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Loony McMoonbat at November 24, 2009 11:38 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: volfan at November 24, 2009 11:41 AM (lF49h)
Posted by: Brad at November 24, 2009 11:42 AM (A4IUv)
Repeat from last thread:
I spent 7 years in the Navy and I never heard of an "Admiral's Mast". NJP was called "Captain's Mast".
I would hope that they would not take "Captain's Mast". The reason they call it non-judicial punishment is because there is no finding of guilt involved. You are guilty when you go, the intent of the "mast" is to allocate punishment. It is the resposibility of the XO to determine guilt or innocence through "investigation" and it appears that he has already done that. PC bullshit at work again here folks.
Posted by: Vic at November 24, 2009 11:42 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: RobD at November 24, 2009 11:44 AM (sV3Dv)
Posted by: NJConservative at November 24, 2009 11:44 AM (/Ywwg)
Posted by: RobD at November 24, 2009 03:44 PM (sV3Dv)
Wait until you get the new hats.
Posted by: Army of the Republic of France at November 24, 2009 11:44 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Harry Callahan at November 24, 2009 11:46 AM (fagDq)
Posted by: Rocks at November 24, 2009 11:46 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: slade at November 24, 2009 11:46 AM (XsHAM)
Posted by: Adam Lambert at November 24, 2009 11:47 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: David Brooks at November 24, 2009 11:49 AM (ERJIu)
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 24, 2009 11:49 AM (ERJIu)
Posted by: Punky at November 24, 2009 11:50 AM (enQSu)
Posted by: the real joe at November 24, 2009 11:51 AM (rFTt2)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 24, 2009 11:51 AM (0GFWk)
Good for the Seals. I bet the higher ups thought the seals would just take the punishment and walk away, but instead they are standing up for themselves against an every weakening military leadership. I hope they take this all the way and win. God knows are military needs Special Ops men more than the Special Ops men need our military. These are guys that could be raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars with a private security firm and still have access to top equiptment.
Full Disclosure: I would side with the Seals even if we found out they killed the terrorist by rubbing a rusty cheese grater on his taint until he died of massive blood loss.
Posted by: Ben at November 24, 2009 11:52 AM (wuv1c)
IÂ’m sure they will promptly escape to the Los Angeles underground.
Posted by: Dave at November 24, 2009 11:53 AM (VNkRM)
I don't have the experience you outline but that was my feeling too.
I don't doubt they gave the guy a bloody lip. They should be told, "don't do that again" by their detachment leader and that's it. But given the desire to run people up on charges in these wars, it becomes a huge case.
There's zero sense of proportion and some people are way to eager to throw their fellows under the bus (the asshole general who go the snipers brought up on charges in Afghanistan comes to mind).
The SEALS no doubt lied about something but short of murder, rape or the like, I Do Not Care. They should not have been put in the position to have to have lied out of fear of ruining their carers over a non incident.
Something is seriously wrong with our military at a certain level.
Posted by: DrewM. at November 24, 2009 11:53 AM (FCWQb)
The 82nd and 101st Airborne troops are under orders not to say ‘Geronimo’ during airdrop operations. Paratroopers are instructed to state “I’m Sorry” in a clear voice as they deploy from the aircraft.
-
Preemptive apoligizing should work.
Posted by: BumperStickerist at November 24, 2009 11:53 AM (ruzrP)
This kind of PC bullshit will result in the death of many of us in the years to come
That depends on how you define "us."
The 52 aren't "us" to me anymore.
Posted by: MikeO at November 24, 2009 11:53 AM (dYNrR)
Posted by: Fritz at November 24, 2009 11:53 AM (GwPRU)
And here I sit with the label of "pussy" hanging about my neck like a flaming tire in South Africa. What a world.
Posted by: Ryan Seacrest at November 24, 2009 11:54 AM (SqAkN)
"Sorry Sir. It appears that he slipped on a falafel and landed on my KaBar....three times. Then buried himself in a fig orchard."
I'm being flippant, of course. But this is going to be corrosive to good order in the ranks and it's gonna get people killed.
In fact, it's already getting people killed. In Lone Survivor, Marcus Luttrell talks about how his SEAL team had a couple of sheep herders come upon their position, compromising them. They captured the locals and had an intense discussion about killing them on the spot (which would have been the tactical thing to do). Ultimately, they released them. The sheep herders ran directly to the nearest Taliban and ratted the team out. The result: 19 American dead.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 24, 2009 11:54 AM (l1Wlr)
The three, all members of the Navy's elite commando unit, have refused non-judicial punishment — called an admiral's mast — and have requested a trial by court-martial.
This is a load of crap, and props to them for demanding the Court Martial and getting this on the record. Some ass-covering c*cksucking admiral is behind this, I have no doubt. Probably the navy's answer to Wes Clark. I hope they end some careers on this.
Posted by: Dang Straights at November 24, 2009 11:54 AM (Haq+B)
Posted by: BuckNutty at November 24, 2009 11:55 AM (lArRj)
Posted by: Methos at November 24, 2009 11:55 AM (CoDwG)
Posted by: I Need A Beer at November 24, 2009 11:57 AM (Tot+h)
Posted by: Ben at November 24, 2009 11:58 AM (wuv1c)
Split lip ? And all his teeth - such as they were - intact ?
Slap's more like it.
The Muj abroad and here are now given full civilian AND military protection
K E L F M N
Doubt me kuffir ? Fools ! Dar al-Islam is called on by their Guiding Doctrine, the Qurap, to do three things ...
1) convert the Infidel
2) if the Infidel will not convert, they must pay the jizyah tax
3) if the Infidel will not convert or be taxed, put them to the sword
Simpletons out there, clue up. This shit's current since the 600s
Posted by: OhioDude at November 24, 2009 12:00 PM (b229W)
IIRC, even when carried out ethically and honorably, military justice isn't even in the ballpark of the civilian justice system when it comes to the rights of the accused. Not to mention the farce this is likely to become.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 24, 2009 12:01 PM (l1Wlr)
Barack Obama: "I'll finish the job in Afghanistan."
Since when did this sucker of cock go on active duty? Attend Command and General Staff College? War College?
If he were a true Commander in Chief concerned with both the outcome and the military, he would have said we will finish the job in Afghanistan, giving credit to the people that will actually perform the heavy lifting.
What a dick.
Posted by: Fish at November 24, 2009 12:01 PM (6mfq0)
Keyrist, what is wrong with this country?
Posted by: MPFS Turkey Fish Sticks yeah! at November 24, 2009 12:02 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 24, 2009 12:04 PM (AZGON)
Drew:
In the Marine Corps and Navy, honesty and integrity are the most important attributes of a member. Even in criminal investigations, it's often a focus as to whether the subject has lied, obstructed etc. He could rest on his Art 31 rights and say nothing, which would be fine. I've seen this dozens of times: some otherwise minor offense, or even an eventually non-criminal incident becomes criminal when evidence surfaces of lies, obstruction. The remedy is for the member to completely honest, or say nothing at all. Good leadership should obviate these kind of results. I have no doubt these SEALS were well led, as is evidenced by the Officer in Charge's referral of the incident up the chain of command. I'm feeling sick about this. I've actually prosecuted these kind of resultant process crimes and you hate to do it, but that's the law. I always thought of it as manufactured crime, but we still can't have members lying to commanders.
Posted by: slade at November 24, 2009 12:05 PM (XsHAM)
"Barack Obama: "I'll finish the job in Afghanistan."
Well if you don't need me sign my discharge papers I guess.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 24, 2009 12:06 PM (SqAkN)
Mmmm. Navy Seals.
Oh, wait, what? What was the topic?
I would actually like to see the numbers of military choosing not to re-enlist since the great half white hype was elected. Does the military keep track of that? And do people have the choice not to re-enlist?
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at November 24, 2009 12:06 PM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: Edward Woodward at November 24, 2009 12:06 PM (c5UhX)
In other words, the Navy probably would have let this go without action if the SEALS did not do something to obstruct the investigation, or lie about something stupid....
Who the fuck is "investigating" a fat lip and hurt feelings? This is war, not black friday shopping here.
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 24, 2009 12:08 PM (R8sI7)
OK, so far we have "stupid" police in Cambridge, "rabid" right wingers that killed that census worker, "militant" combat vets starting militias all over the country and now "bullies" that gave a bloody lip to a murdering POS.
Bizarro World!
Come on Nov. 2010, I'm losing it way too quick.
Posted by: BIG ROB at November 24, 2009 12:08 PM (rHVFP)
What a dick.
Posted by: Fish at November 24, 2009 04:01 PM (6mfq0)
As I have always said, I think it is important to keep my eye on the ball. I will finish the job, and I will accept nothing less then my total victory over those that oppose me. Next I would like to talk about Afghanistan.
Posted by: Barack Obama at November 24, 2009 12:09 PM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Harry Callahan at November 24, 2009 12:09 PM (fagDq)
They should look at retirement as soon as the charges are dismissed.
Posted by: Vic at November 24, 2009 12:09 PM (CDUiN)
Posted by: Todd at November 24, 2009 12:10 PM (LLOGQ)
Haven't I read that, as the Armed Services have shrunk, the JAG Corps component has grown. Has this resulted in the military lawyer being more important than the guys actually killing enemies?
Posted by: ed at November 24, 2009 12:10 PM (Urhve)
Posted by: slade at November 24, 2009 12:10 PM (XsHAM)
I always thought of it as manufactured crime, but we still can't have members lying to commanders.
Yeah, lying is only acceptable if a higer ranking person does it to a lower ranking person
Posted by: Ben at November 24, 2009 12:11 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: lorien1973 at November 24, 2009 12:11 PM (IhQuA)
Posted by: Jay at November 24, 2009 12:11 PM (WKg4v)
Hey, I'm not defending it; just 'splainin' it. BTW, Murtha, a former Marine like my less than humble self, is a traitor and has dishonored the Marine Corps with his accusations against the now innocent Haditha Marines. If I ever met the man I'd punch him in the face
you're right in your assessment, but lets not pretend that the officers in the military are held to the same standard as the NCOs and enlisted men.
Posted by: Ben at November 24, 2009 12:11 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Dave at November 24, 2009 12:11 PM (Xm1aB)
You know what I think is hilariously ironic? Those who are demanding PC treatment are the first ones who are going to be slaughtered when the inevitable occurs. I am trying to find it amusing that I'm going to be under a freaking wall due to an inability to protect myself. Yup. It's going to be funny. Yuppers.
Posted by: alexthechick at November 24, 2009 12:12 PM (bQ5xy)
" I have no doubt these SEALS were well led, as is evidenced by the Officer in Charge's referral of the incident up the chain of command."
I disagree.
Said Officer should have used better judgement, and let it go. Investigate the officer.
Posted by: Pelvis at November 24, 2009 12:13 PM (LlaBi)
If JAG had been present on Iwo Jima after the Marines completed the mop-up operation, more men would have been in jail that buried in that volcanic rock.
Posted by: Fish at November 24, 2009 12:14 PM (6mfq0)
"Sorry ol bean, but did I just put another hole in your head?"
"Sue me!"
Posted by: Joseph Brown at November 24, 2009 12:15 PM (mumWu)
Has this resulted in the military lawyer being more important than the guys actually killing enemies?
Yes. Goddamned JAG is everywhere, and how do they get promoted? Prosecuting troops.
Posted by: Dang Straights at November 24, 2009 12:16 PM (Haq+B)
Fair point and for example, I wasn't destroyed over Scooter Libby's conviction, lying is lying (though I'm not conviced he lied but that's the jury's call).
The difference is, it's a damn war zone.
There were other ways to handle it without even going the NJP route. Problem is a guy like Lt. Col. Chessani gets nailed for not investigating with what someone up the chain considered sufficient zeal and his career and life is in the shitter, even if he is never tried.
So these things automatically go to 11 because no one wants to be the guy who just handles it in house.
That's a much bigger problem than anything the SEALS did but it will never be addressed.
Posted by: DrewM. at November 24, 2009 12:16 PM (FCWQb)
Posted by: Mal at November 24, 2009 12:18 PM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: zeb at November 24, 2009 12:19 PM (qLZ+x)
Posted by: ed at November 24, 2009 12:19 PM (Urhve)
Has Barry issued a statement that we shouldn't jump to any conclusions yet?
Posted by: TheQuietman at November 24, 2009 12:20 PM (1Jaio)
Sadly it is all too clear that the gay/liberal powers that be are employing the same plan with the military that they successfully used to infiltrate the public education system.
Posted by: bulwark at November 24, 2009 12:21 PM (jvrmc)
You hate to do it but it's the law?
Shit. All JAG does is go after the real soldiers, and get used to play politics by the brass against eachother.
Posted by: Dang Straights at November 24, 2009 12:21 PM (Haq+B)
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 24, 2009 12:21 PM (R8sI7)
Posted by: slade at November 24, 2009 12:21 PM (XsHAM)
PC is reverse discrimination that was founded and remains funded to target white males. Are any of these 3 SEALS black, brown, red or yellow?
"Said Officer should have used better judgment, and let it go. Investigate the officer."--pelvis
What is said Officer's personal racial profile?
/PC is the liberals' favorite white on white crime to prosecute "the incorrect".
Posted by: Porgy Tirebiter at November 24, 2009 12:23 PM (+CLh/)
Not quite the same thing, yet, but apropos.
Posted by: andycanuck at November 24, 2009 12:23 PM (2qU2d)
Posted by: rplat at November 24, 2009 12:27 PM (G1ArL)
Terrorism is funded by Obama, Inc. initiating a war tax to usurp more NEW TAX funds from our military to train more terrorists to play his revisionist eine kleine nachtmusik. The last straw, price fix each American scalp @ $1million.
Posted by: Porgy Tirebiter at November 24, 2009 12:33 PM (+CLh/)
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at November 24, 2009 12:38 PM (UGAk/)
Cordially,
Uncle J
Posted by: Uncle Jimbo at November 24, 2009 12:44 PM (jo56i)
The dereliction of duty charge is the kiss of death for any military career,even if acquitted the taint will always be there.The services of these fine courageous young men( which took hundreds of thousands of our tax dollars to train)are now lost to us forever because some terrorist got a bloody lip.
Posted by: bulwark at November 24, 2009 12:49 PM (jvrmc)
The op was Sept. of this year, btw.
Petty Officer Julio Huertas, SO-1, faces those same charges and an additional charge of impediment of an investigation.
Does not sound like a scadi to me.
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 24, 2009 12:54 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 24, 2009 12:55 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: GarandFan at November 24, 2009 12:56 PM (ZQBnQ)
Posted by: azlibertarian at November 24, 2009 12:57 PM (fGtbP)
Posted by: Christopher taylor at November 24, 2009 12:57 PM (PQY7w)
Posted by: Redcoat at November 24, 2009 01:00 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: ed at November 24, 2009 01:00 PM (Urhve)
Posted by: pinche migra at November 24, 2009 01:02 PM (E3SK8)
They would have preferred to hold them until next September 11th, but the cells need to be kept available for conservative talk radio hosts.
Seems like the concept of war and the identification of the enemy need to be made clear to this administration.
Posted by: obama is a traitor at November 24, 2009 01:15 PM (Qt4Y7)
That's part one. Part two is that the civilian politicos need to stop trying to continue their political games via attempts at using military rules against members that are motivated more by political concerns than anything else. Not cricket.
Posted by: Horatius at November 24, 2009 01:17 PM (2RFeW)
I know there are differences and that this isn't good legal or even logical analysis. But my gut can't get past the churning and anger that something about this stinks. We're railroading Navy Seals for God's sake - among our absolute best - and at the same time we're bending and contorting every conceivable standard to make sure the terrorist who masterminded the death of 3,000 innocent Americans gets not just a fair shake, but more than that.
With all due respect, please don't bother to explain the differences to me and why my "moral equivalency" here doesn't hold up to logic. I know it really doesn't too. I've read the threads and I get it. But I just can't get past my feeling that something is rotten here.
Posted by: RM at November 24, 2009 01:21 PM (1kwr2)
As for 'making up emails', I believe you may have a job opportunity at the East Anglia Hadley CRU, where such skill sets are in high demand.
Posted by: eaglewingz08 at November 24, 2009 01:23 PM (dv8zz)
If either one of them hit you, you would be in the fucking hospital for weeks. If anything they might have flicked his little poor lip with a pinkie. You know, just trying to scare a fly or something away.
It's too damn bad there wasn't some kind of accident on the way back to base.
Papa Ray
Posted by: Papa Ray at November 24, 2009 01:25 PM (JpVJn)
Posted by: 2549 at November 24, 2009 01:28 PM (WYkJI)
It is NOT sufficient these people be exonerated. There is a greater justice to be served.
Posted by: alwyr at November 24, 2009 01:28 PM (Ngf0i)
I have an extremely hard time believing this to be true. If it is true, for the first time in my life, I'm ashamed of my country.
Those who brought these charges and those who allowed them to be brought deserve to be kicked out of what ever positions they currently have and to be ridiculed to the point that their names epitomize infamy and will be mocked whenever they're mentioned - as does the current Army chief of staff for his asshole remark belittling the lives of his soldiers.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 24, 2009 01:31 PM (r1h5M)
Because the Navy has perhaps well deserved that rep. And I can only name less than one hand's worth of incidents. I wonder what the guys serving currently can name.
Every disaster has multiple causal factors, and they don't always merely reside in the guy who caused the final act that led to the disaster--but that is the guys who usually gets to sit in the dock.
Don't join the Navy.
Posted by: Horatius at November 24, 2009 01:34 PM (2RFeW)
Posted by: MPFS Turkey Fish Sticks yeah! at November 24, 2009 01:36 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: MPFS Turkey Fish Sticks yeah! at November 24, 2009 01:37 PM (iYbLN)
I'm a long time removed from the United States Army, but if I recall correctly (I usually don't) the rank of the Officer hearing your case can have loads of bearing on the punishment meted out. In the Army, it was called an Article 15. Dunno what it's called in the Navy.
Anyhoo, in the Army, a Company Grade Officer (Lt through Army Captain) could only fine you and bust you one grade (IIRC). A Field Grade Officer (Major through Bird Colonel) could bust you down to buck-ass Private and give you time. Thirty days, I think. 'Bad' time, as it's known.
Never heard of anybody going in front of a General Officer for minor cases. Dunno. Maybe. I dunno. (Navy Flag Officer = Army General Officer [Ithink])
Anyway, I can understand them choosing a Court Martial if they don't trust their own Commanding Officer, who would be hearing the case. Unless things have changed, they'll probably get a 'Special' Court Martial which is usually done by a single, high-ranking Field Grade Officer from another unit. Usually a Bird Colonel (Navy = Captain).
Posted by: Uncle Rick at November 24, 2009 01:39 PM (El8pC)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at November 24, 2009 01:47 PM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Jen at November 24, 2009 01:59 PM (34k2v)
Posted by: ed at November 24, 2009 02:03 PM (Urhve)
pokes head in, sneaks out
there is no fucking way i'm commenting here
okay, one thing thats been missed....njp) to award punishment the co needs a proponderous (sp) of guilt, and CM is where all rules of evidence applies
i see this getting tossed before the trial
oh, and horatius, stop that don't join the navy crap, some of us can spell and don't have to keep walking down the hall (vets, you know what i'm saying, heh)
Posted by: navycopjoe at November 24, 2009 02:10 PM (jXmDA)
Posted by: drfredc at November 24, 2009 02:19 PM (ljMiA)
Not being a lawyer, or in one of the Sea Services, but having dealt with issues like this, here is the probable scenario: The captured douchebag complained to a bunch of people, probably saying it was much worse than it was. Someone took an interest in the complaint, either as a do-gooder (people shouldn't do stuff like that) or an axe to grind (I hate those spec ops guys, this war, etc). That person drops it in official channels, either through JA, IG, Chain of Command. Questions get asked (lots of people who should know better panic when they get read their rights in an investigation, especially if they didn't know it was coming). Either the chain of command decide to go with NJP to avoid Abu Ghraib echoes (we know how much the media LOVES the military)--they took action so the media can't go on and on about cover-up, or someone in the JA or Chain of Command decided to make an example of folks. The problem here is the political environment (Abu Ghraib and Haditha most vividly). Too many senior officers looking for their next promotion, especially at the GO/Flag level, do what is most politically expedient. They don't want the press to torpedo their chances.
Posted by: GrimJack at November 24, 2009 02:24 PM (iTA1p)
Can charges of dereliction of duty be brought against the assholes not defending the men serving under them? This crap is demoralizing to our troops. If rationing were ever called for it is the rationing of f---n lawyers. We need to cut their numbers by about 99%.
Sure there are some good ones but we wouldn't need so many good ones if we eliminated the pond scum that comprise the majority of them.
Put the fuckers in uniform and let them earn an honest living in the military for a while. Thet them see the reality our troops have to deal with in the swamps, deserts and shitholes in which our boys have to fight. Maybe that would open their eyes.
Posted by: Ohio Dan at November 24, 2009 02:26 PM (RQ+qN)
No, I'm serious. Not too terribly concerned if you like it. Not too terribly concerned at all.
The Navy has a rot in it, more than the other services. Only way it is going to change is by tough love. Of course, familiarity breeds contempt.
Saavy?
Posted by: Horatius at November 24, 2009 02:31 PM (2RFeW)
Maybe they should have shouted Allah Akbar prior to swinging their fists. Or carried a card that said SOA.
I don't care if we find out they were trying to cut the fool's tongue out when they busted his lip. Give them a medal and send them to me. I always wanted me a SEAL.
Posted by: Sue at November 24, 2009 02:32 PM (YiSq/)
Posted by: slade at November 24, 2009 04:05 PM (XsHAM)
It is a manufactured crime and no less immoral than they myred number of manufactured crimes cooked up by totalitarian regimes the world over.
I'm glad you came forward and offed us more detail, but what consequences would an average soldier face if he did stand on his Article 31 rights? I'd think that your typical 'chicken shit' officer would go way out of his or her way to make sure that soldier, sailor, or airman would have a very miserable existence under his command, to the point that article 31 rights are little more than a paragraph in the UCMJ.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at November 24, 2009 02:40 PM (H7Rlw)
i respectfully declined his advice, and the next day at the academy, went and talked to the school JAG, a full bird with crossed arrows on his collar and a CIB. he told me the charges against me were bogus, and was *very* interested in the fact that the defense JAG was helping set the charges against his clients. since this was a AIT environment, few of the victims had any knowledge of what few rights you have under UCMJ, and this asshat was railroading them. so, not only did i not get screwed, but i actually got to screw a lifer that had it coming in the process. %-)
Posted by: redc1c4 at November 24, 2009 02:48 PM (d1FhN)
Posted by: GrimJack at November 24, 2009 02:53 PM (iTA1p)
Posted by: PDizzle at November 24, 2009 03:03 PM (R0lVr)
Posted by: PDizzle at November 24, 2009 03:13 PM (R0lVr)
Posted by: United States Citizen at November 24, 2009 03:19 PM (C39a6)
Posted by: Federale at November 24, 2009 03:34 PM (ryQYO)
Carried over from another thread:
United States Central Command declined to discuss the detainee, but a legal source told FoxNews.com that the detainee was turned over to Iraqi authorities, to whom he made the abuse complaints. He was then returned to American custody. The SEAL leader reported the charge up the chain of command, and an investigation ensued.
What the fuck? Did this guy suddenly get a case of the PCs?
Why did he even bother to report this shit? Who the hell cares if the little hadji got a bloody lip. I'd have probably made him eat the butt of my weapon until he shit pieces of it.
This isn't the first time the military has screwed its own.
The recent Courts Martial of Army 1SG John Hatley comes to mind.
We should stop taking prisoners. ThereÂ’s no point in it. The enemies we capture get more condolence from a sympathetic media than the bravery it took to capture them.
Posted by: SFC MAC at November 24, 2009 03:42 PM (cuNX0)
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 24, 2009 03:59 PM (dQdrY)
Hey lawyer dudes, fuck you.
You give them impossible ROE and then pontificate from you safe warm office about how dare the grunts tell a lie. Did I say fuck you? Fuck you, just in case you missed it the first time.
Fuck you again.
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 24, 2009 04:03 PM (dQdrY)
But my basic idea of what should happen is that a SEAL is pissed that this guy murdered good people, and gave him a well justified punch. Perhaps the terrorist said something ugly, or the SEAL's buddy was hurt, whatever. He let emotions get the better of him because he loves his country, and fucked up this terrorist's lip. His commander lectured him for a while and gives him a shit detail, perhaps a seriously lousy detail, or otherwise slaps him on the wrist.
If the terrorist is even telling the truth about being punched, which is hard to accept, then I just don't see what's wrong with this situation. If the punishment goes to the level where the SEAL's career is hampered... if he's even reduced in rank or passed over on promotion, that is overkill. We should want our trained killers to want to hit terrorists, of course.
Posted by: The Nobel Peace Prize Committee (NPPC) at November 24, 2009 05:06 PM (t1sje)
Yep. This is a serious fucking strategic mistake, though. Waterboarding terrorists saved Los Angeles from a 9/11 style attack. I assume, I think with great justification, that capturing terrorists in Iraq and elsewhere, gave us tons and tons of intelligence that saved a lot of lives.
We aren't going to get that intel anymore, and it's stupid to capture these people to spend millions trying them in courts or feeding them and buying them neat Korans and laptops before we release them back to the battlefield. Just leave them dead, sadly, is the only way to deal with them, and that could lead to a huge disaster in the coming years.
Posted by: The Nobel Peace Prize Committee (NPPC) at November 24, 2009 05:09 PM (t1sje)
Posted by: marine43 at November 25, 2009 03:48 AM (B95Gw)
The word of three SEALS trumps the word of one terrorist shitbag.
who saw the lip pop? No One? who says it happened? an iraqi?, the terrorist? Are there pictures or video's of said lip pop? who are the witnesses who saw what happened?
Looks open and shut to me, three sailors word aginst the word of an enemy murderer who killed and burned American's and hung their bodies from a bridge who has just been captured by the same SEALS.
Whoops, I forgot Barry Sortero, AKA Barack Hussain Obama POTUS (PBUH) is in charge any action by our military is considered illegal.
Posted by: HEP-T at November 25, 2009 07:12 AM (mAR3c)
We are asking for perfection from young heroes risking their lives for E4 and E5 pay. Shame on us, we do not deserve their efforts...
Posted by: walkerny at November 25, 2009 09:01 AM (bNtSQ)
How about looking at the photo of the AMERICANS killed, burned, and hung from a bridge in Fallujah. Just look at it for a solid minute.
Let these young heroes go to continue their magnificent service to our country, and lets put this terrorist on trial for his life.
Posted by: walkerny at November 25, 2009 09:07 AM (bNtSQ)
We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm
Posted by: walkerny at November 25, 2009 09:08 AM (bNtSQ)
We need to start a lobbying effort to pass a law that when soldiers are prosecuted for combat related actions and acquitted, the commander who intitiated the process and the prosecutors must be tried for treason.
Posted by: J at November 26, 2009 08:38 AM (VIpzY)
Posted by: camellialan at April 26, 2010 10:47 PM (JHO0s)
Posted by: Maxine Griffiths at May 29, 2010 12:52 PM (5yS+P)
Posted by: custom promotional prodcuts at June 03, 2010 12:43 AM (mYNod)
Posted by: online bingo bonus at September 13, 2010 07:07 PM (X20Tk)
Posted by: Family and General Practice in Pennsylvania at September 19, 2010 05:33 AM (TDKLy)
Posted by: Find antique preserve at September 23, 2010 05:27 AM (OXokM)
Posted by: Find appliance batteries at September 25, 2010 04:35 AM (Iy+0U)
Posted by: Louisiana Womens Health at September 26, 2010 04:43 AM (iRnRY)
Posted by: Find antique reproductions at September 27, 2010 04:52 AM (W5kg2)
Posted by: clock insurance directory at September 27, 2010 06:42 AM (KFCvA)
Posted by: play free online games at September 29, 2010 07:04 AM (iRnRY)
Posted by: wholesale Cosplay Costumes at April 11, 2011 01:02 AM (zMRm2)
Posted by: wholesale Cosplay Costumes at April 11, 2011 01:02 AM (zMRm2)
مسلسلات رمضان 2011
Posted by: منتدى at June 17, 2011 04:39 AM (U4RPl)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2192 seconds, 292 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: dumb_blonde at November 24, 2009 11:35 AM (kgP2R)