December 29, 2009
— Open Blog When you see as many movies as I do, you learn to avoid entire categories, either because you don't like them or because you're just flat out tired of 'em. For example, I skipped last year's "The Class" and "The History Boys", just because I'm tired of the whole Blackboard Jungle thing.
Even when I like a movie, if I'm acutely aware of the formula, it can be hard to really get into it. (I liked "The Last Samurai" but I couldn't keep from thinking "Oh, look, a white guy's gonna show the Japanese how to be better Japanese.")
Rarely, however, you end up missing something that approaches a well-worn storyline in a refreshing way, as I almost did with the new Great Expectations-ish The Blind Side.
In this movie, Michael Oher, a ginormous black orphan who has lucked into a place in a fancy Christian private school, ends up being adopted by Leigh Ann Tuohy (a MILFed-up Sandra Bullock). Over the next two hours, they change each others' lives.
You can understand my dread. "Based on a true story!" even.
In what constitutes a Thanksgiving miracle—yeah, it's been out for a while—this actually works. Why?
Well, first of all, the characters are well-defined and interesting, the story is lively with lots of barriers impeding the characters' desires, the dialogue is funny and touching, and the resolution is satisfying. It all sounds so easy when you put it that way. But really, there are a ton of pitfalls t this kind of movie, and the movie avoids almost all of them neatly.
For example, there's a tendency (to put it mildly) in a movie like this to wallow in racism. There is racism in this film, but it goes both ways and mostly comes across as one of many forms of xenophobia. There's no temptation to make it the central point of the film.
This can lead to the related pitfall of viewing the world as a unrelentingly cruel place where selfishness is the sole motivator, and the righteous protagonists are the only beacon of hope, sacrificing all in the process. Now, the Tuohys are definitely good folk, but there's no real hardship for them. It's not about them "sacrificing"; the movie shows a convincing case that (as said in the movie's most wince-worthy moment) Michael is changing their lives.
Their "sacrifices" are shown in contrast to what their charge has endured, but rather through their understanding of those things, instead of through graphic flashbacks. Really, the only serious discussion about whether they should be doing what they're doing revolves around their kids. And even then, it's not like there's a question that they should help.
It's kind of refreshing. And it feels true, too, in the characters' reactions to what is, essentially, Leigh Ann's rather powerful sense of responsibility.
The tertiary characters are a rich assortment. There's a lot of naked self-interest. There's some altruism. There's a veneer of altruism masking healthy doses of self-interest. At the same time, the movie doesn't try to portray self-interest as evil. It comes across as natural: There is an "I"; there is also an "us" (as in our team or family). In other words, it seems very realistic.
This movie avoids The biggest pitfall of all—mawkishness. This is charmingly reflected in Leigh Ann's tendency to leave the room rather than have anyone see her get emotional. But the whole film does that: It shows us the projects, the poverty, the bureaucracy, the politics, the opulence, the desperation, the kindness, the bravery—all without the high melodrama or glib politics these sorts of movies are prey to. It allows you to feel what you'll feel from the circumstances, not from having characters overact.
I can't say I viewed it entirely apolitically. The Tuohys are Republican. So Republican, apparently, they don't know any Democrats. But this is more of a cute point, only significant because I can't recall any film ever where the main characters are both kind, generous and explicitly Republican. The real (political) thought that occurred to me, as I was watching this poor kid wander around The Projects was, "Gosh, everyone wants to go to public school and live in public housing! Why wouldn't they be crazy about public health care?"
So, yeah, I brought my own snark. The movie doesn't address the issue at all. (Which is fitting, I think.)
Anyway, the Boy (my 14-year-old movie companion) enjoyed it quite a bit. I attribute that to the lack of gross sentimentality and the general liveliness of the whole movie.
Anyway, if you're like me and you've been waffling on seeing it, give it a shot: There's a reason it's still playing. And stay for the closing credits to see pictures of the real Tuohys with Michael Oher.
Posted by: Open Blog at
11:47 AM
| Comments (52)
Post contains 806 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Zimriel at December 29, 2009 11:56 AM (94eYr)
Posted by: Vile Roman at December 29, 2009 11:58 AM (sOpAl)
Posted by: gomm at December 29, 2009 11:58 AM (Ibk1S)
Posted by: johnny_p at December 29, 2009 11:59 AM (ldoxy)
Anyway, the Boy (my 14-year-old movie companion) enjoyed it quite a bit. I attribute that to the lack of gross sentimentality and the general liveliness of the whole movie.
I couldn't possibly be that Sandra Bullock is teh hawt.
Posted by: TC at December 29, 2009 12:00 PM (QXKjZ)
...either because you don't like them or because you're just flat out tired of 'em.
Well in this decade it would be very easy to get tired of them. Looking at the list of the top 20 high grosing pictures of this decade all but 2 or sequels.
Hollywood is afraid to issue new movies.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2009 12:00 PM (QrA9E)
Posted by: DanO at December 29, 2009 12:07 PM (6tSsl)
Posted by: erp at December 29, 2009 12:09 PM (BDRHK)
Posted by: gomm at December 29, 2009 12:12 PM (Ibk1S)
We just saw the movie on Dec. 26. It was truly awesome. I was so inspired, I bought the book by Michael Lewis (paperback) at Target on the 27th and finished it on the 28th. The movie stays pretty true to the book (I had thought for sure that some of the scenes in the movie had to have been "Hollywoodized", like the car accident scene, but that really happened)
Anyways, Michael Lewis was a childhood friend of Sean Tuohy but hadn't spoken to him for 25 years. He was writing a book on their H.S. baseball coach ("Coach") so he contacted Sean for that project in 2003. Sean told him about Michael Oher and how he was becoming a family member, but the author dismissed it. A few months later, the author was going to do another article on the NFL for a magazine and he read an article about left tackles, and how they were being paid more than other offensive linemen. He subsequently went out to dinner with his wife and Sean Tuohy. After hearing Michael's story, Lewis's wife told him "I don't understand why you are writing about anything else."
It really is an amazing story, and I loved that it was big bad evil Republicans that took Michael Oher in and gave him the tools he needed to succeed. It wasn't gubamint programs. It kind of sounds like he might lean to the right too:
From Michael Lewis's book, "The Blindside: Evolution of a Game"
"... Michael informed Leigh Anne that, if he indeed made it to the NFL, he intended to buy a house with 13 bedrooms so that his mother and siblings would be guaranteed shelter. Now he wasn't so sure he wanted to do that. 'They had the same chances I had,' he said. 'They need to get off their lazy asses and work. They need to start hearing 'no'."
I highly urge all you morons who haven't seen this movie to go out and see it. I am going to see it again. It was that good.
Posted by: runningrn at December 29, 2009 12:18 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Boxty at December 29, 2009 12:19 PM (5hnn2)
Posted by: Darcy at December 29, 2009 12:21 PM (cnJcX)
Hey go see Blind Side. It is a true story. They left out some of the best parts. Leigh Anne Touhy--the real Leigh Anne Touhy is 5" 1" and 115 pounds of pure dynamite. She was a cheer leader at Ole Miss, and some 25 years on or so could still be a cheer leader at Ole Miss. Her daughter followed in her footsteps and was also a cheer leader at Ole Miss. Leigh Anne Touhy is a force of nature and she gets what she wants. She is also very much a committed Christian--and Republican.
There are some cheap Hollywood shots in the movie---lazy clerk sitting on her fat ass in a gubmint office is chastised by Ms. Tuohy for making people sit and wait for hours while staff does nothing; Tuohy asks to see who is responsible, and lazy clerk points to a picture of Dubya on the wall.
But all in all, Hollywood treated white Southern Christians like human beings for once. That alone makes the movie worth seeing. And as for Michael Oher, the black kid in the movie? Well he graduated from Ole Miss, and got taken in the first round of the NFL draft last spring. He's #74 and he is the starting right tackle for the Baltimore Ravens. You can see him on the tube when they play.
Posted by: Chicken Choker & Corncob Smoker at December 29, 2009 12:22 PM (ktYjH)
Posted by: Sharkman at December 29, 2009 12:39 PM (Zj8fM)
Oh, I also wanted to say that the casting was spot on (Sandra Bullock was great and physically resembled Lee Anne Tuohy). (Although, the husband is nowhere in the same zip code of approaching Tim McGraw!)
Also that scene in where they were in the DHSS office (I think) where the lazy assed clerk pointed to George Bush's picture when Lee Ann Tuohy asked the woman who her boss was did not offend me (and I love GWB!) It's just endemic of that whole bureacratic mindset that the individual worker isn't responsible for anything; the typical stereotypical gubamint drone. But they will abuse what little power they do have if they feel like taking you down a peg.
Posted by: runningrn at December 29, 2009 12:41 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: someone at December 29, 2009 12:56 PM (njJQD)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at December 29, 2009 12:58 PM (ALhPJ)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at December 29, 2009 12:59 PM (ALhPJ)
Big Detroit Lions' fan, here.
I desperately wanted the Lions to draft him at pick 21, but, of course, they f**ked up and took a tight end.
Bad for Lions' fans - great for Michael Oher. I'm glad he could escape the vortex of human suffering that is the D.
Posted by: stickety at December 29, 2009 01:02 PM (5Ttcl)
Posted by: Darcy at December 29, 2009 01:05 PM (cnJcX)
Posted by: curious at December 29, 2009 01:19 PM (p302b)
(I have never watched the movie versions of Bonfire of the Vanities or Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas because I hate to see my favorite books destroyed. Nice to know it hasn't happened to this one.)
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at December 29, 2009 01:49 PM (kZT4X)
Posted by: moviegique at December 29, 2009 03:14 PM (1y5Vr)
Posted by: moviegique at December 29, 2009 03:52 PM (1y5Vr)
Posted by: moviegique at December 29, 2009 03:57 PM (1y5Vr)
Totally buying this when it hits the shelves.
Posted by: tdpwells at December 29, 2009 04:02 PM (Ei3oZ)
Posted by: gop_patriot at December 29, 2009 04:09 PM (Df6DX)
I've flatly refused to see this movie for precisely the reasons you intitially hesitated. I hate HATE to be manipulated in such a way as to suggest I'm too stupid to know better. (You know. Like that stupid ass Tim McGraw song from a few years ago where he did his best to rip a tear from our eye. WTH was the name of that song?)
Now, I might give it a shot.
My daughter and I saw It's Complicated on Christmas night. The entire audience, men and women, young and old, were all roaring. Very adult, very funny, with very few cheap tricks. And, it didn't go out of it's way to make the cheating male a cliche'. Things are rarely black and white and the movie tried to show that. (Although, personally, I'm kind of a black and white kind of girl. Cheating is just wrong!)
I am very dedicated to not contributing one red cent to a film that contains soapbox actors (FU Sean Penn, who I won't even watch on cable.) but, for the life of me, I can't quite kick the Alec Baldwin habit.
Damn you Alec Baldwin and all you're comedic talent!!
Posted by: jmflynny at December 29, 2009 04:42 PM (P1Pda)
#28...
You want to see change...
Check out the old and new (newer) versions of Sabrina. The scene where Bogey/Ford meets with Hepburn/Ormond at the tennis court/solarium is painful to watch. In the newer version, Ormond slaps the piss out of Ford when he gets out of hand. Hepburn, not so much.
Posted by: jmflynny at December 29, 2009 04:47 PM (P1Pda)
Posted by: Dudley Smith at December 29, 2009 04:54 PM (reGWo)
Posted by: Dudley Smith at December 29, 2009 05:05 PM (reGWo)
Posted by: RJ at December 29, 2009 07:25 PM (ADbI4)
Not quite. All her Republican friends and associates are racist, selfish, dishonest scum.
"Good" Republicans apparently take homeless, mildly-retarded black boys into their home without asking too many questions. All other Republicans are bigoted filth.
Posted by: RJ at December 29, 2009 07:29 PM (ADbI4)
Yup. Apparently Dubya runs the DMV. And the DMV was a well-oiled machine before Dubya took office. *rolls eyes*
Posted by: RJ at December 29, 2009 07:36 PM (ADbI4)
Not really. The Sandra Bullock character goes on a rant about how "real Christians" would be filling their (expensive, private) school with charity cases from the 'hood. The "Christian" football coach is a self-interested putz. Sandra Bullock's character denounces the school for being "too white." Most of the Christian students at the school shun Michael Oher, apparently out of irrational racist fear. Most of the Christian teachers treat Michael Oher like dirt at first.
Posted by: RJ at December 29, 2009 07:42 PM (ADbI4)
I love Morgan Freeman. But pretty much all the characters he plays lately are either God, President, or "magic negro" types. He's become typecast, which is unfortunate, because he's a real talent.
Posted by: RJ at December 29, 2009 07:44 PM (ADbI4)
But what was the message there? The message was that she was afraid to tell them that because most Republicans are bigoted scumbags who refuse to even associate with a Democrat. Which, of course, is complete and utter bullshit. But that was the subtle message.
Posted by: RJ at December 29, 2009 07:46 PM (ADbI4)
Posted by: RJ at December 29, 2009 07:49 PM (ADbI4)
- - -
Yabut, here's the thing: Pretty much EVERY Christian/rich person/Republican in the movie is portrayed as hateful/ignorant EXCEPT the protagonist's family. (Also, the word "redneck" is used at least three times.)
The message was: Most Republicans/Christians are basically selfish slime; the rare "good" Republican is the type who adopts a random black child off the streets and dedicates their lives to them, in order to "learn" from him.
Posted by: RJ at December 29, 2009 07:55 PM (ADbI4)
Posted by: Dave J. at December 29, 2009 08:04 PM (Pw+Zz)
Yeah, yeah, the movie was "based on a true story." Awesome. So was Oliver Stone's "Nixon" and "JFK."
This wasn't a documentary; it was a "message movie" - Everyone is just a "product of their environment," and all white women should be more like Madonna and Angelina Jolie.
Posted by: RJ at December 29, 2009 08:12 PM (ADbI4)
Wow! A lot of conservative hate
here!
The problem with going into a movie with preconceived
notions about the film makers (whether true or not) is that you can
end up interpreting things the way you think they want you to, rather
than just looking at what's there.
Best example I can think of
is Frost/Nixon.
I don't blame y'all for being a bit sensitive,
but suggesting that the DMV scene is a slap at Bush is a tad
hypersensitive. Nobody really thinks of the DMV as a product of Bush,
but it makes being a lazy-ass bum a convenient excuse.
As the
movie makes clear—and the real life interviews bear out—Leigh Ann
Tuohy is a force. This has nothing to do with her husband being
wimpy.
Sometimes you just have to go to a movie not seeing it
as a "message" meant to convey broad types, but a unique
story about unique people.
I mean, if you're going to go to
the movies. Which, of course, no one has to.
Posted by: moviegique at December 29, 2009 10:35 PM (1y5Vr)
Posted by: LiveFreeOrDie at December 30, 2009 04:37 AM (p/a9V)
Posted by: DrSteve at December 30, 2009 06:15 AM (t+B7A)
Posted by: pendejo grande at December 30, 2009 07:06 AM (ipxsa)
Posted by: pendejo grande at December 30, 2009 07:19 AM (ipxsa)
It's just one guy... Jeez RJ rant away on your OWN blog and you may want to fix that HUGE chip on your shoulder.
Posted by: JFH at December 30, 2009 07:30 AM (oDco5)
Posted by: moviegique at December 30, 2009 12:32 PM (1y5Vr)
Posted by: laws of thinking at March 22, 2011 06:29 PM (ANwOD)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2494 seconds, 180 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: garrett at December 29, 2009 11:53 AM (4CV8N)