December 18, 2009
— Ace
After marathon talks, the Obama administration and Democratic leaders appeared near agreement with Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson late Friday night to provide the crucial 60th vote needed for Senate passage of health care legislation.Majority Leader Harry Reid intends to unveil a final package of changes in the long-debated legislation on Saturday "and is confident that it will prevail," his spokesman, Jim Manley, said in a late-night statement.
Nelson, the Senate's most conservative Democrat, has been seeking fresh concessions to restrict access to abortion coverage in the legislation, as well as more money for his home state of Nebraska and other changes.
He told reporters "real progress" had been made, but he offered no details and said nothing final had emerged from the talks.
...
That gave Nelson enormous leverage as he pressed for concessions that included stronger restrictions on abortions to be covered by insurance policies offered in a newly overhauled health care system. Officials said he was also seeking to ease the impact of a proposed insurance industry tax on nonprofit companies, as well as win more federal funds to cover Nebraska's cost of treating patients in Medicaid, the state-federal health care program for the poor. These officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the talks, said the administration and Democratic leaders had offered concessions on those points.
Another payoff to a particular state, what a shock.
Can anything be done? I don't know; may be too late. Dick Morris sent along this request for donations to run an ad in Nebraska warning Nelson off voting for the bill; maybe that's something.
(I don't know anything about the organization, by the way.)
Cthulhu Pic: Sent by ArthurK, via Moonbattery, and via The Corner.
Posted by: Ace at
10:14 PM
| Comments (393)
Post contains 300 words, total size 2 kb.
I was just about to head off to bed, but I thought, "I'll just check Ace and see if anything new has happened while I was looking at por...uhh...I mean checking e-mail." Sure enough. Something new has happened. I should have just gone to bed.
Posted by: Shane at December 18, 2009 10:20 PM (En7m1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 10:21 PM (QECjC)
Good thing I'm drunk, otherwise I'd be really pissed off.
Can't blame Nelson, he's a goddamned democrat after all. It's the cocksucking traitors like Snowe that need to be keelhauled.
Posted by: Dang Straights at December 18, 2009 10:23 PM (CUyEC)
Posted by: enoxo at December 18, 2009 10:26 PM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: Girl Thursday at December 18, 2009 10:27 PM (s+1cw)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 10:28 PM (QECjC)
No, it can't go away. Not after they granted themselves trillions of dollars of slushfunds to buy it's way through and make sure it passed.
The representative republic is truly dead, it's 1770 all over again - taxation without representation.
Posted by: Dang Straights at December 18, 2009 10:30 PM (CUyEC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 10:31 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 18, 2009 10:31 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: Beverly at December 18, 2009 10:31 PM (wpKXc)
Well, I guess that conservatives have to reinforce to the people the impact of the tax increases as well as other items in this mess. The point has to keep being hammered home again and again over the next 11 months. The GOP really has to regain control of both houses to slow this thing down anyway they can. While I hate to say this the GOP have to play just as harder, if not harder then the Dems both outside and inside the house.
Why doesn't the GOP have a George Soros type of guy to heavily fund conservative information outlets? Geez, you would think they would.
Methinks the next fight is going to be with the EPA.
Posted by: scr_north at December 18, 2009 10:32 PM (J1BlG)
Posted by: Beverly at December 18, 2009 10:33 PM (wpKXc)
I can't even muster the energy to be angry about this. Just numb at this point; there's not many more nails they can put in the coffin. Souter destroyed private property, Wee Wee invalidated contract law, now Reid and Pelosi have socialized our health.
Blehhh, drink.
Posted by: Dang Straights at December 18, 2009 10:33 PM (CUyEC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 10:34 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 18, 2009 10:35 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at December 18, 2009 10:37 PM (iz93r)
CPI spiked this week, too; inflation is about to start the inevitable climb towards the sun. It just gets better and better.
Posted by: Dang Straights at December 18, 2009 10:37 PM (CUyEC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 10:40 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: Girl Thursday at December 18, 2009 10:42 PM (s+1cw)
Posted by: RayJ at December 18, 2009 10:44 PM (rDhm0)
Posted by: Girl Thursday at December 18, 2009 10:49 PM (s+1cw)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 10:49 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 10:52 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 18, 2009 10:55 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 10:57 PM (QECjC)
1. One or more Republican always siding with the Democrat, and
2. Holdout Democrats always voting Democrat in the end?"
To 1) Because they are all statists at heart differing only in degree. At some point each will seek special privilege/funding on behalf of him/herself or the constituents he/she represents. Deal-making essentially guarantees collusion for a theft when states compete at a federal level.
To 2) Because there is no such thing as a Blue Dog. It's a publicly-sold contrivance to create the illusion in conservative-leaning states of traditional/conservative bona fides (which can dropped at any time).
It's a game with the public the pawns being played. Statism and loss of Liberty is inevitable - broken up only intermittently by revolution when the collective mass doesn't feel it has anything more to lose.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 18, 2009 10:58 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: red131 at December 18, 2009 10:59 PM (dCY+4)
Posted by: Thesher at December 18, 2009 11:00 PM (pkacg)
Posted by: ddiddly at December 18, 2009 11:00 PM (JXF5g)
Posted by: Girl Thursday at December 18, 2009 11:02 PM (s+1cw)
Posted by: red131 at December 18, 2009 11:05 PM (dCY+4)
Posted by: devilish at December 18, 2009 11:08 PM (vyRPu)
Posted by: Just Another Poster at December 18, 2009 11:08 PM (HAdov)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 11:08 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 18, 2009 11:09 PM (d1FhN)
I think that the deal is that they need 60 votes by Monday to get "cloture" (ending debate and allowing a vote) in time for the vote itself to come up on Christmas Eve.
For that they only need 50 + 1 for it to pass.
This way Nelson can go home to Nebraska and tell them that he voted for this obscenity before he votes against it.
Posted by: Deety at December 18, 2009 11:10 PM (aVzyR)
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 18, 2009 11:11 PM (d1FhN)
Posted by: arhooley at December 18, 2009 11:12 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: Girl Thursday at December 18, 2009 11:13 PM (s+1cw)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 11:14 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 18, 2009 11:15 PM (d1FhN)
Posted by: Girl Thursday at December 18, 2009 11:15 PM (s+1cw)
to hell with insurance, i'm spending the money on more ammo.
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 18, 2009 11:16 PM (d1FhN)
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 18, 2009 11:17 PM (d1FhN)
Posted by: enoxo at December 18, 2009 11:18 PM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: mojo at December 18, 2009 11:20 PM (5MA1v)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 11:22 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: arhooley at December 18, 2009 11:22 PM (GKXA7)
I bought a large pile when it looked like Gore might get elected. that stuff is real valuable now.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at December 18, 2009 11:24 PM (iz93r)
Posted by: Doc at December 18, 2009 11:24 PM (rzJpR)
Posted by: arhooley at December 18, 2009 11:25 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: enoxo at December 18, 2009 11:27 PM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: Doc
-----------------
We're going to have to start thinking something, god knows. Seriously, the Sons of Liberty tossed the tea into Boston Harbor. What can we do?
Posted by: arhooley at December 18, 2009 11:27 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: arhooley at December 18, 2009 11:29 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: Flubber at December 18, 2009 11:30 PM (P9y3i)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 18, 2009 11:31 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: arhooley at December 18, 2009 11:32 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 18, 2009 11:32 PM (d1FhN)
Posted by: Girl Thursday at December 18, 2009 11:33 PM (s+1cw)
Posted by: enoxo at December 18, 2009 11:33 PM (p0Ddl)
--------------------
If only "insurance" and "medical care" weren't intangible services, unlike tea. I'd just like to burn, dump, or otherwise destroy something that the perps had money in.
Posted by: arhooley at December 18, 2009 11:36 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 18, 2009 11:37 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 11:37 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: Girl Thursday
---------------------
Right you are, GT. That's why I'm seriously looking for non-procedural, disobedient ideas. Voting the fuckers out won't work. When the hell ever are the most entrenched ones going to get voted out in our gerrymandered districts? Nancy Pelosi is one of the greatest villains in the country, and yet one of the safest seats in Congress. Writing letters and marching and voting aren't going to be enough.
Posted by: arhooley at December 18, 2009 11:38 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 18, 2009 11:39 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: arhooley at December 18, 2009 11:40 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 18, 2009 11:41 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 11:42 PM (QECjC)
I'd like to be a fly on the wall in the House-Senate conference, if this thing move on.
Oh, Rove, you magnificent bastard.
Posted by: Roy at December 18, 2009 11:43 PM (SuLPC)
Posted by: iamfelix at December 18, 2009 11:43 PM (fraVs)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 11:45 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 11:46 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: red131 at December 18, 2009 11:47 PM (dCY+4)
Posted by: The Golden Goose at December 18, 2009 11:47 PM (iz93r)
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 18, 2009 11:47 PM (d1FhN)
Posted by: enoxo at December 18, 2009 11:49 PM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: tdpwells at December 18, 2009 11:50 PM (Ei3oZ)
Posted by: iamfelix at December 18, 2009 11:51 PM (fraVs)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 18, 2009 11:51 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 18, 2009 11:52 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: tdpwells at December 18, 2009 11:52 PM (Ei3oZ)
Posted by: tdpwells at December 18, 2009 11:54 PM (Ei3oZ)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 18, 2009 11:54 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: wherestherum at December 18, 2009 11:57 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 18, 2009 11:57 PM (zmiSr)
-------------------
Mitch McConnell said he has some other procedural tricks up his sleeve. Work your magic, Mitch!
Posted by: arhooley at December 18, 2009 11:57 PM (GKXA7)
They are extremely power-hungry. They've been lusting after control over health care for 40 years, and they are thiiiiiiiis close to getting it. bastards.
Posted by: The Golden Goose at December 18, 2009 11:58 PM (iz93r)
Posted by: enoxo at December 18, 2009 11:59 PM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 12:00 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: arhooley at December 19, 2009 12:01 AM (GKXA7)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 12:01 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 12:03 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 12:05 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 12:05 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 19, 2009 12:06 AM (d1FhN)
It's enough. They are treasonous and criminal, worse than the worst Mob families....it's time to fight back
Posted by: Mo at December 19, 2009 12:08 AM (OTQBO)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 12:08 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 12:08 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: arhooley at December 19, 2009 12:09 AM (GKXA7)
108 Well, Joe DID campaign for the Republican presidential nominee.
when? they didn't nominate a Republican for president in '08......
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 19, 2009 12:13 AM (d1FhN)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 12:14 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: Percopius at December 19, 2009 12:14 AM (V0nbk)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 12:21 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: arhooley at December 19, 2009 12:22 AM (GKXA7)
http://tiny.cc/r378F
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 19, 2009 12:25 AM (d1FhN)
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 19, 2009 12:26 AM (d1FhN)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 19, 2009 12:26 AM (zmiSr)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 12:29 AM (p0Ddl)
Meanwhile, I'd like to see a revolt by the ultra-lefties. What would that be? Maybe they'd all hold their breath until they turn blue.
Posted by: arhooley at December 19, 2009 12:32 AM (GKXA7)
All they need is a start, that they can tinker with endlessly down the road. And use to buy votes from the idiots, by promising "improvements". Just like every other fucking entitlement program they've foisted on us.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at December 19, 2009 12:32 AM (iz93r)
Just as the suicide bombers are willing to die for their cause because they expect 72 virgins in Heaven, the Democrats are willing to lose their elections next year because they expect the socialist paradise they're enacting to be worth it in the long run. They're just too damn stupid to understand how ruinous it will be.
It is very hard to maintain hope right now.
Posted by: Kensington at December 19, 2009 12:32 AM (BlBnA)
Posted by: arhooley at December 19, 2009 12:34 AM (GKXA7)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 12:36 AM (p0Ddl)
At least, given that the vast majority of "benefits" don't kick in for four years, there may still be time to convince the American people to revolt against this in time to undo it.
It's a slim hope, perhaps, but what else is there to do if these bastards get it through?
Posted by: Kensington at December 19, 2009 12:37 AM (BlBnA)
I have a big damn day tomorrow. Niece is getting married and I'm doing the cake.
Posted by: arhooley at December 19, 2009 12:38 AM (GKXA7)
Posted by: Eric at December 19, 2009 12:38 AM (Qc/s6)
Posted by: arhooley at December 19, 2009 12:42 AM (GKXA7)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 12:43 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: arhooley at December 19, 2009 12:44 AM (GKXA7)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 12:46 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: arhooley at December 19, 2009 12:50 AM (GKXA7)
Posted by: arhooley at December 19, 2009 12:54 AM (GKXA7)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 12:54 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 12:54 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: Girl Thursday at December 19, 2009 12:55 AM (s+1cw)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 01:05 AM (p0Ddl)
ALEXSMASH.
And, just of out idle curiousity, is there an actual really written bill yet? Or are they voting on vaporware?
Posted by: alexthechick at December 19, 2009 01:22 AM (h1WPo)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 01:23 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 01:24 AM (p0Ddl)
Yeah, this thing won't be over -- no matter what -- until January 2011. It could be rolled back. Getting the public option out of whatever the current version is, is a big accomplishment.
Explain what the "benefits" are of this plan, even from a lefty point of view. People don't want it now. The only reason it has any support is that liberals feel sorry for Obama -- they treat him like a retarded child -- and want to give him what he's asking for.
I also have a feeling that the Democrats are playing a very dangerous game of chicken here. That is, lots of them don't want any part of it passing, but they all want to be on record supporting it. Hence, Joe leaves town.
Nelson is off, now he's on. I think they want to have this thing ping pong back and forth so that at the end of the day it fizzles out because the commies can't reconcile with the less-than-commies. Ultimately, I think that's what they're betting on.
In the meantime, Reid is playing ham-fisted poker. He's always bluffing that he's got the votes when he doesn't.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 19, 2009 01:31 AM (T0NGe)
Make them read the damn thing. Every. Last. Fucking. Word. That way we'll know that there's one damn person in this entire country who has actually, you know, read the thing.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 19, 2009 01:33 AM (h1WPo)
2010 Congressional Elections Update:
U.S. HOUSE: Dems=258, Repubs=177, Republicans need to beat 41 democrats, and lose no Republican seats, to take the House in 2010, and to have the majority of votes needed to elect Republican John Boehner, as the new Republican Speaker of the House, and boot Nancy Pelosi out as the Speaker.
(takes 218 out of 435 seats to make a majority
in the House)
In the 1994 Republican Revolution, House
Republicans picked up 54 seats.
All of the House is up for reelection in 2010,
so all Democrats can be voted out in 2010.
———————————————————
U.S. SENATE: Dems=58, Repubs=40, Independent=2
(Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman)
Roughly 1/3 of the Senate is up for reelection every 2 years.
37 Senators are up for reelection in 2010, and
of those 37, 19 are Democrats, and 18 are
Republicans.
Republicans need to lose no Senate
Seats in 2010, and beat 20 Dems (gain 20 Senate seats)to have the 60 cloture-vote margin (filibuster-proof) to pass
legislation, but there are only 19 Democrats
up for reelection in 2010 to beat, so the
other 1 added Senate seat will have to be
done in 2012, if Joe Lieberman, the
Independent moderate, does not caucus (vote)
with them on enough legislation.
If the Republicans pick up all 19 Democrats Senate seats, and lose no Republican Senate Seats in 2010, they will have the Independent Senator Joe Lieberman, who caucuses (votes) with them some of the time, to give them the 60 Senate votes the Republicans need to pass some legislation in 2010.
In the 1994 Republican Revolution, Senate
Republicans picked up 8 seats.
---------------------------------------------------------
Even with a Republican sweep in 2010, it will most likely take the 2012 Congressional elections, along with a conservative Republican President, to give Congress the ability to pass legislation, that begins fixing the damage that has been done to America. This is due to the fact that it takes a 2/3 majority vote in each Chamber, to override President ObamaÂ’s veto power. This would be 290 votes in the House, which is unlikely, and 60 votes in the Senate. A Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney, or Tim Pawlenty as President in 2012 would be a continuation of restoring sanity to America.
———————————————————
List of the 19 Senate Democrats up for
reelection or retiring in 2010:
-Ted Kaufman (D) of Delaware (Repubs Mike
Castle and Christine OÂ’Donnell challenging)
-Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas (Repubs Gilbert
Baker and Curtis Coleman challenging)
-Barbara Boxer of California (Repubs Chuck
DeVore and Carly Fiorina-rino? challenging)
-Michael Bennet of Colorado (Repubs Jane
Norton, Ken Buck, and Cleve Tidwell challenging)
-Christopher Dodd of Connecticut (Repubs Rob
Simmons, Sam Caligiuri, and Peter Schiff are
challenging)
-Daniel Inouye of Hawaii (Repub Gov. Linda
Lingle possible challenger)
-Roland Burris of Illinois (Repubs Mark Kirk
and Patrick Hughes challenging)
-Evan Bayh of Indiana (Repub challengers
include Marlin Stutzman)
-Barbara Mikulski of Maryland (Repub
challenger Eric Wargotz)
-Paul G. Kirk Of Massachusetts (Special
election held in Jan 2010, Republican
challenger Scott P. Brown)
-Harry Reid of Nevada (Repub challengers
include Dan Tarkanian and Sue Lowden)
-Kirsten Gillibrand of New York (Possible Repub
challengers Rudy Gulianni and Liz Feld)
-Chuck Schumer of New York (*NO REPUBLICAN
CHALLENGER YET)
-Byron Dorgan of North Dakota (possible Repub
challengers Paul Sorum, John Heoven, and Duane Sand)
-Ron Wyden of Oregon (*NO REPUBLICAN
CHALLENGER YET)
-Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania (Repub
challenger Pat Toomey)
-Patrick Leahy of Vermont (Repub challenger
Len Britton)
-Patty Murray of Washington (Repub challenger
George Nethercutt)
-Russ Feingold of Wisconsin (Repub challenger
Dave Westlake)
—————————————————-
and republican candidates running in all 50
States, so seek them out, research them, and
join with other conservatives to get the word
out, and letÂ’s flip the House and Senate in
2010, and restore freedom and dignity to
America.
Posted by: 2010 Elections Update at December 19, 2009 02:02 AM (tAjAM)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 02:34 AM (p0Ddl)
Come on, really?
Dick Morris just sent that link along, eh?
I'm totally against the health reform act making its way through Congress, but I'm much more against untransparency on the part of political operatives on the right.
Don't fucking jerk us off, Ace. You know a lot about that organization and claiming otherwise really makes you seem stupid and easily led.
Posted by: someguy at December 19, 2009 03:01 AM (VRJIW)
Posted by: Dave in Singapore at December 19, 2009 03:11 AM (FsB36)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 03:12 AM (p0Ddl)
I am here to FUCKING EXULT!
I WREAKED HAVOC on the single table SNGs tonite!
For FIVE WEEKS I've been a FUCKING POKER GOD!
Bow before me, all you lesser beings!
Give me your fucking money please and thank you very much!
Give it to me!
Posted by: gp at December 19, 2009 03:20 AM (bQzXH)
Elections have consequences.
A plurality of liberals, misled Americans, welfare mendicants and 95% African Americans voted for Democratic control of Congress and placed an inept, narcissitic, cold and lying socialist ideologue in the White House. Whether right or wrong you cannot now feign ignorance and hope to turn back the clock.
This man is your President and you have to face the consequences of your lazy and (quite frankly) stupid and uninformed vote and accept President Obama and his incompetence until November 2012 when again you will have the right and honour to exersize your franchise as a voter on Gods greatest nation.
It is unfortunate that this is not just about incompetence. This is ineptitude of the highest order from your vote for this individual to his subsequent actions and the venal support by your main stream media who have kept you poor souls in the dark for decades.
Too many Americans think that life is like surfing the channels on telelvision. You think that you can just switch life's channels if you do not like what you see. Sorry it does not work like that. Unfortunately with dumbed down youth voting, welfare mendicants voting and pampered liberals in Califirnia and New York voting you are left with a Government that will soon show them that they will get just the opposite of what they want.
When the streets start to get dirty as the liberals continue taxing and spending cities into oblivion, as crime escalates with Democratic corruption in the body politic, as the aging liberals cannot get their medical tests and have to wait in line at hospitals, as the youth cannot get jobs and have to pay more taxes you will indeed see that elections have consequences. I even see now that they are subverting the rules to give GM to the unions, to ram through Obamacare (funny what Libermann said to Franken - REALLY!!??), refunding ACORN, paying off the unions with billions in tax dollars, proping up failed state coffers with your tax dollars under the guise of TARP and STIMULUS and with much subterfuge changing the rules as they go along.
ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.
Long live your President and the Congressment and Senators - WHOM YOU VOTED FOR IN NOV 2008.
Posted by: joseph at December 19, 2009 03:28 AM (d566u)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 03:33 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 03:36 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 03:37 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 19, 2009 03:37 AM (zmiSr)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 03:38 AM (p0Ddl)
This wouldn't be the first time Harry Reid lied about "having a deal" -- although I hate to be optimisic and fool myself. Still, he likes to lie to put pressure on the rest of the Senate, making this look "inevitable" -- didn't he and Shumer stand up there last week and say they had a deal worked out? How out of character would it be for Reid to try another last minute bluff?
Posted by: Juliet16 at December 19, 2009 03:43 AM (EPMEV)
/s
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 19, 2009 03:45 AM (zmiSr)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 03:49 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 03:50 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 19, 2009 03:54 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 03:54 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: Dave in Singapore at December 19, 2009 03:59 AM (FsB36)
Posted by: J at December 19, 2009 03:59 AM (T3/qP)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 19, 2009 04:00 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 04:01 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: Dave in Singapore at December 19, 2009 04:03 AM (FsB36)
Posted by: Barbarian at December 19, 2009 04:03 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 19, 2009 04:03 AM (0GFWk)
Freedom works online warroom will send emails to your reps. Quick and easy. Tried to post link here but too long i guess. It is free as well.
Posted by: marine43 at December 19, 2009 04:07 AM (YQq4S)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 04:09 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: mistress overdone at December 19, 2009 04:11 AM (2/oBD)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 04:11 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: Barry Soetoro (D-King OF The World!!!) at December 19, 2009 04:15 AM (vLtWP)
Posted by: marine43 at December 19, 2009 04:15 AM (YQq4S)
Posted by: Dave in Singapore at December 19, 2009 04:16 AM (FsB36)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 04:21 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 04:24 AM (p0Ddl)
Okay, that whole 'The country is doomed to slavery and facism' thing aside:
I want to have a sex change just so that I can have sex with that poster and bear its children. I don't care who you are, that there is funny.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at December 19, 2009 04:28 AM (pZEar)
I will certainly contribute a sizable amt to Nelson's opponent should he vote for this deathcare bill. and Send the receipt in one of the UNDNC's prepaid envelops attached to a few phonebooks.
I wonder if this is a pressure tactic by Reid, this asshole did the same thing 3 weeks ago, Bloomberg had the headline, and then in the next week it was obvious that there was no deal.
I hope these fuckers are stupid and oblivious. Because if they cram down this piece of shit legislation, forget you repubs and conservatives, they now have newly disgusted ex-democrats and new independents like me to worry about.
I don't know remember 1994, I voted for Bill Clinton, but could never understand why repubs/conservatives hated BC then. But now with the internet, I see how the MSM lies, I see how they cover up for that asshole in the WH. There was no internet in 1994, the information now avaialble makes it impossible for the MSM to carry the storyline for their product, Obama, without the American public figuring out the true story.
I am more, a million times more pissed off at that america-loathing/Constitution-hating/military-hating marxist in the WH and his comrades in Congress than I ever was at Bush and Cheney.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 04:30 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 04:36 AM (p0Ddl)
stupid asshole Ben Nelson.
I am contributing $$ to the RNC right now! Is there is a limit to how much a person can contribute to the RNC per year??
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 04:40 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 04:41 AM (QECjC)
500 Billion in Medicare cuts
500 Billion in new taxes
The US dollar as a reserve currency, its days are numbered.
By 1st quarter next year, America's depression of the 21th century will be obvious and just accelerating, and with these new taxes, unemployment will easily reach over 12%.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 04:45 AM (ACkhT)
After the last few years, I'd admire the optimism of anybody expecting to win this one--but, come on, our squishes not having enough backbone and the moderate Democrats caving in at the end was as predictable as the plot to Avatar. Maintain hope (otherwise this is all pointless) but expect little.
Posted by: AD at December 19, 2009 04:45 AM (BNbYO)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 19, 2009 04:47 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: fluffy at December 19, 2009 04:49 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 19, 2009 04:50 AM (9Cooa)
Posted by: fluffy, selectively editing at December 19, 2009 04:52 AM (4Kl5M)
fluffy,
ok, I don't have much understanding of the RNC, I will take your advise and contribute to good candidates instead.
I've sent $$ to sarah palin and doug hoffman, can anyone list some more? Who's the dude running agn Spector? I WANT SPECTOR DEFEATED!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 04:52 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 04:54 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: B+ at December 19, 2009 04:55 AM (hIOnV)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 04:56 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: fluffy, Masshole at December 19, 2009 04:56 AM (4Kl5M)
Nice guys finish last apparently. Lazy fucking imbeciles.
Posted by: Barbarian at December 19, 2009 04:58 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: fluffy, Masshole at December 19, 2009 04:58 AM (4Kl5M)
oh my God, as much I didn't like Bush, I at least respected the man. We have a Buffon-in-chief right now:
President Barack Obama burst into a meeting of Chinese, Indian and Brazilian leaders to try and reach a climate agreement in late Friday negotiations in Copenhagen.
Chinese protocol officials objected to Obama's presence in the meeting, according to a senior administration official,
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 05:00 AM (ACkhT)
well, so no one knows how much this shit is going to cost, no one knows what it is, people can be jailed, fined for not buying healthcare.
I can gurantee you, most people do not have any idea of the penalities. And right now people are more pissed that this is all being done in secret, essetially they want to pass a blank check, payable in any amount, payable to whoever.
THere is a backlash comning, and it will be severe, much more than 1994 ever was.
Just try and jail or charge people for not buying something they don't want to.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 05:03 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 05:04 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at December 19, 2009 05:07 AM (KWhJd)
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 05:07 AM (ACkhT)
Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.
Alas, in the end, there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 19, 2009 05:08 AM (otlXg)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 05:09 AM (p0Ddl)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 05:09 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 05:10 AM (p0Ddl)
Then nobody can claim "we don't know what's in the bill".
There's nobody lower on the scumbag food chain than a politician, and Dem politicians are the lowest of the low. I really wish these poor bastard's souls would have to suffer a fate fitting of Dante's Inferno.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 19, 2009 05:11 AM (otlXg)
they didn't let Liberman talk, so no speaking for soon-to-be-ex-senator-nelson, isn't liberman gone back to CT?
btw, what about jim webb, he's not as as save as he thinks in VA, he was a republican just 5 yrs ago, he is up for relection in 2012 , but the taxes are going up in 2010, and bob mcdonneld and his AG in VA have already said they are invoking the 10th amendent agn any of this crap.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 05:12 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 19, 2009 05:12 AM (PufQP)
Posted by: schizuki at December 19, 2009 05:14 AM (gdjuF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 05:15 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at December 19, 2009 05:16 AM (554T5)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at December 19, 2009 05:16 AM (yxBaM)
Maybe Nelson will try the old "vote for cloture but not vote for the actual bill" trick.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 19, 2009 05:16 AM (otlXg)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 19, 2009 05:17 AM (PufQP)
Posted by: rplat at December 19, 2009 05:19 AM (G1ArL)
That's why the IRS is in charge of looking over your medical insurance records and making sure you comply or pay. People of average means cannot fight the IRS.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 19, 2009 05:20 AM (PufQP)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at December 19, 2009 05:23 AM (554T5)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 19, 2009 09:20 AM (PufQP)
wanna bet? I'm telling ya, most people don't know this. When I told them, they still did not believe me, it was when I showed them part of the House bill they believed me, and trust me some of them are small biz owners, they are very good acctns, they will just not pay that difference. the IRS can keep a running tab of money owed to the US govt, these biz people have no intentions of paying the differnece.
if the number is in the millions of people who refuse to abide, there will not be enough jail cells to hold them
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 05:26 AM (ACkhT)
I'm not completely sure that Reid can hold his caucus.
Webb has been awfully silent, although he probably bends over in the end.
Sanders, the Vermont socialist, will probably freak at the pro-life provisions.
Posted by: Robert_Paulson at December 19, 2009 05:27 AM (+deq6)
Heh. They'll be sent to Gitmo.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at December 19, 2009 05:29 AM (554T5)
and btw, these small biz owners DO NOT use turbo tax, they know where every dollars goes for taxes, the 5 small biz owners I am friends with, have no fucking intentions of paying this. Yes, the average tax payor will have no way to fight this unless they use this same approach.
But many will catch on. Once the see what this shitty bill means to them.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 05:32 AM (ACkhT)
There will never be "millions." I don't even think "millions" are aware of the penalties--they still think this is Barry giving them free shit. But even after they become painfully aware, normal people will not voluntarily ruin their careers and their family lives to spite some retired politicians.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 19, 2009 05:32 AM (PufQP)
Posted by: enoxo at December 19, 2009 05:34 AM (p0Ddl)
Healthcare down, Cap and Trade to go! I'll be el'-presidenta' for life! Just watch me!
OsamaHusseinIslamObama 2012'
(the terrorist-Uighur-ACORN-media choice)
-It's never too early to campaign-
Posted by: Barry Soetoro (D-King OF The World!!!) at December 19, 2009 05:35 AM (vLtWP)
Well, at least they will pay for it at the polls in 2010. It is still another Trillion+ dollars we have to borrow though.
Amnesty in 2010 should be great too.
Posted by: Dan at December 19, 2009 05:45 AM (KZraB)
I don't know if it's already been said but...
Nobody wins with this. When an American public (that still doesn't want single payer, no matter what they say) realizes what has been done, they're going to be righteously pissed. With this "reform," everybody loses; higher premiums screw over the middle class; the progressives hate it because it doesn't do enough; the rich (oh, and everyone else as well) get taxed up the ass; the country loses because we get a few years closer to defaulting on our massive debt.
Who does this benefit, except those in power? Fortunately, these assholes couldn't wait to pass this thing (should it pass) until they got things together. There's so much lose shit going on in this bill, that it contains the seeds of its own destruction. Or so we can hope.
Posted by: Fortunate Son at December 19, 2009 05:46 AM (FaLC9)
History will show this was the beginning of the end of America as a vital world power. The 9/11 Terrorists suceeded beyond their wildest dreams, aided and abetted by their Democrat allies.
Isn't that odd though. The 9-11 terrorists caused us to respond to keep the country safe which caused our own media to lose their collective mind and target the president who wanted us to not die, jumping, burning out of buildings and the like. The media's and far left's use of the media because they never let a crisis go to waste, flips the public against the protectors ushering in far lefty loons who then keep voteing to destroy the country. Not predictable unless "never let a crisis go to waste" is the nexus.
Posted by: Dagny at December 19, 2009 05:53 AM (Y7fs4)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 05:55 AM (QECjC)
What a Wuss- Kill all the babies you can with our tax dollars- just blow a few more bucks in Nebraska first.
Recall the bastard, my dear Cornhuskers. Recall him.
Posted by: Gerry Owen at December 19, 2009 05:55 AM (4Hy88)
I was having a discussion with some friends about this. We decided that we should do just that—fuck you, socialist states; see how well your welfare system works now that America is no longer World Police and you've got to pay for your own protection.
Posted by: Fortunate Son at December 19, 2009 05:58 AM (FaLC9)
I am more, a million times more pissed off at that america-loathing/Constitution-hating/military-hating marxist in the WH and his comrades in Congress than I ever was at Bush and Cheney.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 08:30 AM (ACkhT)
Probably because Bush and Cheney weren't relentlessly and aggressively looking for new and various ways to screw you over personally and ensure that you and your descendants would be trapped in a bleak and dysfunctional neo-feudalistic state as peasants toiling away to send tribute to the new nobility known as "public servants" in D.C..
So, they had that going for them.
Posted by: Deety at December 19, 2009 05:58 AM (aVzyR)
It appears that Reid and Obama are going to give Nelson the anti-abortion language he wants. It also appears that they are throwing in additional dollars for Nebraska(didn't Nelson say he wasn't for sale??? Hmmm sure sounds like a pay off). If all of this is true then Ben Nelson is done in Nebraska(has a U.S. Senator ever been recalled??)
And if this is all true then get ready for Nelson to try and play this that he fought hard and won provisions that will stop federal dollars going for abortion. For that we all applaud. But then I suspect he will say something to the effect that it's only right that all bills get an up or down vote and gosh darn it, I tried my darnedest but majority rules.
Since Mr. Nelson is so concerned about the Life issue, then let me point out a wee-bit of a problem with the Obamacare bill that he appears to be allowing to go forward.
It CUTS a HALF-Trillion dollars from MedicareMedicare is paid to hospitals and doctors for care of our older Nebraskans. So Mr. Nelson, if hospitals and doctors are getting dramatically less to pay for the care of older Nebraskans, what happens to the quality of care for older Nebraskans? Is it time to revisit the term "death panels"? I think this is a LIFE issue worth fighting for as well.
Oh and add in the fact that in an attempt to make up for the billions of lost revenue, hospitals and doctors will be forced to dramatically increase the charge for office visits as well as all other charges to those of us with private health insurance. This will translate into out of control escalated healthcare premiums, co-pays and deductibles. These huge increases in premiums will be shouldered by the consumer and employer and will ultimately push employers from offering insurance and force us all to look to good old Washington DC for healthcare . . . Mr. Nelson, I believe that's called Nationalized Health Insurance.
So Mr. Nelson, it's still not too late. Is this really the legacy you want to leave your grandchildren just so Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Obama can finally trumpet their first and only legislative triumph this year?
Earth to Ben Nelson, find a spine and quick.
Posted by: NebraskaPatriot at December 19, 2009 05:59 AM (x8huy)
Posted by: exceller at December 19, 2009 06:00 AM (Z7Znk)
I hope he enjoys retirement, cause that's what is next for this sell out.
Posted by: kam582 at December 19, 2009 06:00 AM (dJO1T)
Posted by: red131 at December 19, 2009 06:03 AM (X8ufu)
Posted by: AD at December 19, 2009 06:03 AM (BNbYO)
(drowning in new taxes, debt, and soon-rationed healthcare).
Posted by: Soon-to-be-ex-Senator Nelson at December 19, 2009 06:03 AM (otlXg)
Posted by: volfan at December 19, 2009 06:05 AM (lF49h)
Posted by: loppyd at December 19, 2009 06:06 AM (UJIeT)
Posted by: AD at December 19, 2009 06:06 AM (BNbYO)
Posted by: vet Missing Parts at December 19, 2009 06:06 AM (MCHyX)
He keeps saying he believes this will be addressed, I believe that will be addressed.....
You BELIEVE?
Posted by: loppyd at December 19, 2009 06:08 AM (UJIeT)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 19, 2009 06:09 AM (zmiSr)
Posted by: loppyd at December 19, 2009 06:09 AM (UJIeT)
Posted by: vet Missing Parts at December 19, 2009 06:10 AM (MCHyX)
He's trying to say the public isn't opposed to the plan being read on the floor, but rather the original one.
Posted by: loppyd at December 19, 2009 06:11 AM (UJIeT)
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 19, 2009 06:11 AM (EJAGr)
I'm not buying anymore.
Posted by: vet Missing Parts at December 19, 2009 10:10 AM (MCHyX)
I don't believe a GD thing any of them say.
Posted by: loppyd at December 19, 2009 06:11 AM (UJIeT)
Posted by: Ashen at December 19, 2009 06:11 AM (0sky1)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at December 19, 2009 06:13 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 06:14 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: red131 at December 19, 2009 06:16 AM (X8ufu)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 06:18 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: FUBAR at December 19, 2009 06:18 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 06:20 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at December 19, 2009 06:21 AM (554T5)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at December 19, 2009 10:13 AM (pZEar)
+1
Posted by: fiatboomer at December 19, 2009 06:22 AM (0Wf6c)
My only hope right now, and I write this as a registered Democrat, is that 60 votes for Obamacare in the US Senate will translate to 60 fewer Democrats in the Senate come election time. I couldn't be any more disgusted with these vile Democrats. What happened to this party? I'm sorry to all of you for ever supporting them. Go Sarah Palin in 2012!
Posted by: nomobama at December 19, 2009 06:25 AM (+wgYF)
As an aside, I voted for Palin / McCain, my first Repbulican vote ever. Before that, all Democrats in every election. I write that with a heavy heart. Again, my apologies.
Posted by: nomobama at December 19, 2009 06:27 AM (+wgYF)
It's over. The nation is screwed. Tax payer funded health care is on the way.
Merry Christmas.
The democrats have just declared economic war on this nation.
Posted by: ethos at December 19, 2009 06:27 AM (0fzsA)
Our Founders weep from their graves.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 19, 2009 06:31 AM (zmiSr)
IT is getting harder for governments to buy United States Treasuries because the US's shrinking current-account gap is reducing supply of dollars overseas, a Chinese central bank official said yesterday.
The comments by Zhu Min, deputy governor of the People's Bank of China, referred to the overall situation globally, not specifically to China, the biggest foreign holder of US government bonds.
In a discussion on the global role of the dollar, Zhu told an academic audience that it was inevitable that the dollar would continue to fall in value because Washington continued to issue more Treasuries to finance its deficit spending.
He then addressed where demand for that debt would come from.
"The United States cannot force foreign governments to increase their holdings of Treasuries," Zhu said, according to an audio recording of his remarks. "Double the holdings? It is definitely impossible."
"The US current account deficit is falling as residents' savings increase, so its trade turnover is falling, which means the US is supplying fewer dollars to the rest of the world," he added. "The world does not have so much money to buy more US Treasuries."
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 19, 2009 06:32 AM (hZP4n)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 19, 2009 06:33 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: Glass half-empty gal at December 19, 2009 06:33 AM (S3xX1)
What other premonitions can you share?
Posted by: red131 at December 19, 2009 06:36 AM (X8ufu)
Posted by: VELVET AMBITION at December 19, 2009 06:37 AM (u/FF8)
Posted by: nomobama at December 19, 2009 06:39 AM (+wgYF)
Posted by: volfan at December 19, 2009 06:39 AM (lF49h)
The once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to get the govt's foot in the door of healthcare - the statist's wet-dream. Of course, I still think that there will be only chaos before the bill's full effects are felt, but even without chaos, we're still pretty screwed.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 19, 2009 06:39 AM (otlXg)
We allowed the Left to infiltrate our government through contrived social issues and they silenced us with political correctness. That's how we got where we are today.
Posted by: Posted by at December 19, 2009 06:41 AM (jVldi)
A contempt for the citizenry.
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 19, 2009 06:41 AM (EJAGr)
Didn't they just issue an emergency hike in the Debt Ceiling?
Posted by: Techie at December 19, 2009 06:43 AM (zbH+i)
And to add to that, we allowed them to indoctrinate our young via our public educational institutions.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at December 19, 2009 06:46 AM (554T5)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at December 19, 2009 06:48 AM (554T5)
Posted by: volfan at December 19, 2009 06:51 AM (lF49h)
The whole damnable thing can't exist for long.
Posted by: Techie at December 19, 2009 06:52 AM (zbH+i)
ok, I just read up on Pat Tommey and Marco Rubio.
I am contributing my remaining to the max amt today (before FY09 ends) to these 2. can someone please post their contribution links? Thanks!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 06:53 AM (ACkhT)
So basically he's just another Washington D.C. WHORE.
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at December 19, 2009 06:53 AM (erIg9)
There is a bright side to this, folks. We must band together to defeat the left. We must stop whining about our own disagreements and do what the left did to us. We must defeat the left in 2010 and beyond and repeal Obamacare.
Posted by: ethos at December 19, 2009 06:53 AM (0fzsA)
But seeing as these idiots have never cut much of anything in their whole God-forsaken lives, will they really suck money out of the program that most all seniors draw on for healthcare? Especially as these seniors are serious voters?
Posted by: Intrepid at December 19, 2009 06:54 AM (92zkk)
Nice sentiment, but it's not getting repealed. I expect the GOP to make huge inroads in 2010, but not enough to get a Veto Override majority. Remember, Obama's still President until 2012.
That's a long time for a bureaucracy to entrench itself.
Posted by: Techie at December 19, 2009 06:59 AM (zbH+i)
Posted by: di butler at December 19, 2009 07:00 AM (S3xX1)
Posted by: Intrepid at December 19, 2009 10:54 AM (92zkk)
no, this is why this is so freaking scary. They will just print more money to pay for this. This is why the Chinease are livid with this deathcare bill. They might be commies but they are more free market/capitalist than America is now. They know these cuts will never happen, the Fed will just print up more money, and then the US dollar devalues more. Which means the Chinease holdings (along with every other country that holds a tremendous or any amt of US debt/treasuries) will go down in value.
This is why the poster above who posted that article shows that the Chinease and Japs will NOT continue to buy debt. So we will have VERY severe spending contraction (like what Patterson had to do in NY, and a good thing), but also this means people will move investments which are needed for new companies to be built/grown outside the country, most like china/asia. So we will be screwed when this realignment happens. And China is gunning to be top of the heap.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 07:00 AM (ACkhT)
We should also thank the Republicans for taking a united stand against this. That doesn't always happen. They at least see the writing on the wall.
This was all done for the future growth of the Socialist-Democrat party, the growth of the federal government and the death of the private sector.
The democrats really should be called the Socialist-Democrats from here on out. If it's good enough for Europe, it's good enough as truth in advertising.
Posted by: ethos at December 19, 2009 07:01 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Ken at December 19, 2009 07:01 AM (rQI8i)
Posted by: vet Missing Parts at December 19, 2009 07:02 AM (MCHyX)
"The democrats really should be called the Socialist-Democrats from here on out"
As a very recent ex-democrat, I 100% agree with this. these people are socialists and marxists.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 07:03 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: GarandFan at December 19, 2009 07:03 AM (ZQBnQ)
300. Certainly, it's an uphill battle. Maybe for once, we can place enough pressure for a long enough time to actually get these so-called representatives to do something for their constituents, besides raping and steeling from the our grand-childrens bank accounts - and calling it "stimulus".
Posted by: ethos at December 19, 2009 07:05 AM (0fzsA)
completely fight the system. Do not buy anything unless needed. I happen to own a small biz, I have no plans on hiring anyone, no matter how much of my own money they "generouly" give back. And it appears now I may have layoff 2 employees. And I am not the only one, people think this is getting better, the downturn will only accerelate by early next year, who the hell will hire people or grow a biz when they have all these shit like deathcare being thrown at them.
fight the system, don't buy anything, save as much as you can.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 07:07 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Fedup at December 19, 2009 07:07 AM (U4DDN)
what all the right wing "purists" who couldn't hold their nose and vote are thinking, right about now,
doesn't it.
Thanks, for slashing the throats of the American people.
Posted by: Franksalterego at December 19, 2009 07:08 AM (GKyIE)
I also tend to know when people are going to die.
you too?
I see dead celebrities. This weekend, Dick Van Patten will die.
Posted by: Posted by at December 19, 2009 07:08 AM (jVldi)
Posted by: Hugh Jasteroid at December 19, 2009 07:08 AM (lD4DZ)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Bacons, and Assorted Astronimical Phenomena at December 19, 2009 07:09 AM (erIg9)
Beautiful friend
This is the end
My only friend, the end
Of our elaborate plans, the end
Of everything that stands, the end
No safety or surprise, the end
I'll never look into your eyes...again
Can you picture what will be
So limitless and free
Desperately in need...of some...stranger's hand
In a...desperate land
Lost in a Roman...wilderness of pain
And all the children are insane
All the children are insane
Waiting for the summer rain, yeah
There's danger on the edge of town
Ride the King's highway, baby
Weird scenes inside the gold mine
Ride the highway west, baby
Ride the snake, ride the snake
To the lake, the ancient lake, baby
The snake is long, seven miles
Ride the snake...he's old, and his skin is cold
The west is the best
The west is the best
Get here, and we'll do the rest
The blue bus is callin' us
The blue bus is callin' us
Driver, where you taken' us
The killer awoke before dawn, he put his boots on
He took a face from the ancient gallery
And he walked on down the hall
He went into the room where his sister lived, and...then he
Paid a visit to his brother, and then he
He walked on down the hall, and
And he came to a door...and he looked inside
Father, yes son, I want to kill you
Mother...I want to...WAAAAAA
C'mon baby,--------- No "take a chance with us"
C'mon baby, take a chance with us
C'mon baby, take a chance with us
And meet me at the back of the blue bus
Doin' a blue rock
On a blue bus
Doin' a blue rock
C'mon, yeah
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill, kill
This is the end
Beautiful friend
This is the end
My only friend, the end
It hurts to set you free
But you'll never follow me
The end of laughter and soft lies
The end of nights we tried to die
This is the end
Posted by: Techie at December 19, 2009 07:09 AM (zbH+i)
Posted by: eman at December 19, 2009 07:11 AM (yf/JJ)
They are Marxists. But it's not working in the current meme/paradigm to say "Marxist". The MSM goes into full mock panty-twist mode on that little bit of historical honesty. It's better to say "Socialist-Democrat". (IMO)
What the hell - Bernie Sanders(D-Socialist) wants to be called a Socialist - that's what he is!
Posted by: ethos at December 19, 2009 07:12 AM (0fzsA)
What's really bad is Obama keeps on saying his plan focuses on prevention and No One is asking for details about what exactly that means.
Obama is telling us straight up he plans to tell people how to live, what to eat, etc., and no one is even blinking.
Posted by: Posted by at December 19, 2009 07:12 AM (jVldi)
Doesn't Brian Denehey play Dick Van Patten?
Posted by: Hugh Jasteroid at December 19, 2009 11:12 AM (lD4DZ)
Magnificently
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Bacons, and Assorted Astronimical Phenomena at December 19, 2009 07:13 AM (erIg9)
Doesn't Brian Denehey play Dick Van Patten?
Only Van Patten's comb-over.
The man is truly a master at his craft.
Posted by: Posted by at December 19, 2009 07:13 AM (jVldi)
Posted by: eman at December 19, 2009 07:15 AM (yf/JJ)
"The Federal Government is destroying the United States of America.
The Recovering Republic nears."
I am really beginning to think this is 10000%. The system cannot handle this shit anymore. Let the crumbling accelerate.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 07:16 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Terry at December 19, 2009 07:18 AM (Vui52)
Next up, cap and trade- which will seal off the public's pursuit of liberty and happiness.
As the captain of the Edmund Fitzgerald once said: "Fellas, it's been good to know ya."
(hat tip, Gordon feckin' Lightfoot).
Posted by: buster mcdissenter at December 19, 2009 07:19 AM (zN9bC)
In case anyone else is curious, this is how the rats in the Senate voted for the Fed rat, Bernanke, for his re-appointment.
Democrats:
Christopher J. Dodd Chairman (D-CT) Aye
Tim Johnson (D-SD) Aye
Jack Reed (D-RI) Aye
Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) Aye
Evan Bayh (D-IN) Aye
Robert Menendez (D-NJ) Aye
Daniel K. Akaka (D-HI) Aye
Sherrod Brown (D-OH) Aye
Jon Tester (D-MT) Aye
Herb Kohl (D-WI) Aye
Mark Warner (D-VA) Aye
Jeff Merkley (D-OR) No
Michael Bennet (D-CO) Aye
Republicans:
Richard C. Shelby Ranking Member (R-AL) No
Robert F. Bennett (R-UT) No
Jim Bunning (R-KY) No
Mike Crapo (R-ID) No
Bob Corker (R-TN) Aye
Jim DeMint (R-SC) No
David Vitter (R-LA) No
Mike Johanns (R-NE) Aye
Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) No
Judd Gregg (R-NH) Aye
Posted by: Posted by at December 19, 2009 07:19 AM (jVldi)
Morning all. Well, you have to work with what you have. Spend the next 10 months doing something to communicate to the people what this bill really means, not just complaining about it. I think it's fair to say the bloom is off the rose with Obama and people are now ready to hear criticism about him and his policies. I'm talking about your friends, co-workers and the like. People that voted for Obama (and the Dems in general) based on a year of campaign rhetoric and not looking at his last 25 years of speeches, voting record, jobs, inner circle of friends etc. If you start doing this now you will start changing minds for 2010. Make sure that you have reasonable arguments and are prepared to have the racist card pulled on you more than once without folding up. Also remember that there will be a lot of buyers remorse out there but no one likes to be reminded that they made a huge mistake. Be nice when you bring them out from the darkside.
While 2010 won't get the GOP any filibuster or veto proof majorities, if you start now (and start playing hardball) you can probably wrest control of both houses from the Dems. At least that gives the GOP control of all the committees and the agenda. Then you can begin to lay the groundwork to replace this mess with some reasonable reform (Tort reform anyone?).
The GOP has to be prepared to play harder and do so without rino's. It's a tough thing to do but you have to be prepared to lose a couple of seats you may have won if you can replace current/prospective rino's with a reasonable conservative in a couple of nomination contests. You have to hand it to the Dems, when they play they not only play to win they won't let up until their opponent is dead. They have also managed to get a lot of people to equate the word conservative with facist so it's up to conservatives everywhere to change this in the minds of the voters.
Posted by: scr_north at December 19, 2009 07:20 AM (J1BlG)
Sarah Palin did more to change/kill this bill than any republican.
But they held together for the most part on cloture, even though a few voted to move it forward on the procedural level.
How can anyone say we still live in a republic, when the left,right, and center, all oppose the bill, and yet they pass it anyway?
Even liberal polls show the public opposes it by 20 pts, and yet they pass it anyway. We are literally a deadbeat bananna republic that prints and borrows money to pay off politicians against the will of the people.
We are Zimbabwe, only with alot more money (for now.)
Posted by: Dan at December 19, 2009 07:22 AM (KZraB)
Reid and his ugly cohorts are on the tube right now talking this up as if its a done deal. . .
Not good.
Posted by: looking closely at December 19, 2009 07:24 AM (KNy97)
All conservatives running for election/re-election, here's some free advice...Make this priority number one. Explain to the voters why the HC "reform" is a horrible error and then once you're elected the mandate will be undeniable.
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 19, 2009 07:26 AM (EJAGr)
"How can anyone say we still live in a republic, when the left,right, and center, all oppose the bill, and yet they pass it anyway?"
everyone is pissed, liberals, conservatives and centers. This is not a democracy, this is a thugocracy.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 07:27 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: eman at December 19, 2009 07:29 AM (yf/JJ)
Posted by: nelsonsoldusout at December 19, 2009 07:31 AM (1UYON)
Posted by: Dave in Nebraska at December 19, 2009 07:32 AM (BoS3D)
"They will not buy our junk bonds to pay for American Communism. "
wow, what a scaryrily accurate statement. Yes, the Fed cannot print their way out this one, the more they try to debase the US dollar, the more the Chinesase/Japs/russians will accelerate their move away from the dollar.
We are on the precipace alright, precipace of a Depression
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 07:33 AM (ACkhT)
@ 324 eman - The Recovering Republic nears.
@ 327 Terry - Honest to God, where do I sign up to fight this mess.
to all: I'd highly recommend googling/binging the "Texas Nationalist Movement."
The whirlwind, it's a comin'.... and it ain't gonna be purty, no way no how.
Posted by: buster mcdissenter at December 19, 2009 07:34 AM (zN9bC)
Posted by: Oswald at December 19, 2009 07:40 AM (Vui52)
Posted by: vet Missing Parts at December 19, 2009 07:41 AM (MCHyX)
Typical politician nonsense.
At least in the end, there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 19, 2009 07:41 AM (otlXg)
I am willing to bet that a good %age of those screaming about Obama VOTED FOR HIM IN NOV 2008.
Elections have consequences.
Shawn Hannity was right days ago when he said that all the Democrats would cave. Could you imagine ONE Democrat being the person who prevented Obamacare. They would have him for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Think logically. It is best that Obama gets this travesty passed. The GOP has something to hammer away at. If this did not pass then many disgruntled voters would think that they have won a huge battle and could now relax. As it is there is a massive amount of ammunition as the foolishness in Obamacare is exposed for all to see.
And there is not even a guarantee that Nov 2010 will make a difference.
The fact is there is over $600 billion in TARP and stimulus money to spend -which is nothing but a massive Chicago Mafia slush fund.
You still cannot trust the RINO's in the GOP echelons -before and after the elections. They will go into office and do the very things that the statist Democrats espouse and before that will not have the spine to figh hard.
All Obama needs is one big victory and his approval numbers will be up in the high 50s again as the dumbed down electorate forget anything they may have learnt over the past months.
Poor socialist America.
Posted by: joseph at December 19, 2009 07:42 AM (d566u)
Posted by: Peaches at December 19, 2009 07:43 AM (9Wv2j)
another revolution is coming, I suggest to you all , pay off all your bills, hucker down, dont spend money on anything unneccessary. STARVE THIS SOCIALIST BEAST
"
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 07:50 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: eman at December 19, 2009 07:53 AM (yf/JJ)
Posted by: eman at December 19, 2009 07:55 AM (yf/JJ)
They will not buy our junk bonds to pay for American Communism.
Collapse is inevitable.
Posted by: eman at December 19, 2009 11:29 AM (yf/JJ)
That's why I posted those quotes from the deputy governor of the Bank of China. China is warning these assholes off of this mistake. But this is all about power for the Commiecrat party and their associated minions. Nothing more than making more people dependant on them and govt. largesse which gives them power.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 19, 2009 07:56 AM (hZP4n)
dimscum are what they are. They have never been anything different from what they are. They will always be what they are -- scum.
Why is anybody surprised? Anybody who thought, for one second, that a dimscum would stand up against his party on a defining vote is even stupider than the dimscum. And that's pretty stupid.
That said, I'm not entirely, 100%, opposed to a universal health care plan. I just don't want the lying, thieving, marxist dimscum setting it up.
The Congress, including the Senate is now ours (patriotic Americans) to lose. We own it. It's over.
Can the Republicans screw it up? Hoo boy, you bet they can. But no matter how bad the Republicans screw the pooch in the next few months, we stomp the crap out of dims come Novemeber. No doubt about it.
I doubt it will be enough to change a whole lot. The dims will filibuster any meaningful change to the health care bill. But if we (patriotic Americans) fight the good fight, we can win the House (by a landslide) this coming November and win a enough votes to have a simple majority in the Senate. In 2012, we can possibly establish a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate if we can find enough Republican candidates that don't drool all over themselves when speaking.
And boot Obama. But the Senate is the key. We must get a filibuster-proof Senate. I think it's possible.
Then, maybe we can change the health care deal around to make it workable.
What does it say about the Republican Party when the individual with the biggest set of balls in the Party is a woman? And an attractive woman at that.
Very sad indeed.
Posted by: Uncle Rick at December 19, 2009 07:58 AM (El8pC)
Posted by: skh.pcola at December 19, 2009 08:01 AM (Ejiym)
Posted by: kansas at December 19, 2009 08:03 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: UGRev at December 19, 2009 08:06 AM (862vz)
Posted by: OCBill at December 19, 2009 08:08 AM (p28Ei)
100 billion dollars divided up between the Congress and Obama and Biden.
They get their money when they sign a resignation letter and a binding legal agreement to never run for office again and not lobby.
Cheaper than TARP, WAY cheaper than this bill, cheaper than the stimulus bill, and we could start over with the government.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 19, 2009 08:09 AM (4DwVn)
And why aren't the Republicans reading the bill out loud? What is their problem? Are they afraid they won't be able to sit with the cool kids at lunch?
Useless f*cks.
Posted by: shibumi at December 19, 2009 08:10 AM (OKZrE)
another revolution is coming, I suggest to you all , pay off all your bills, hucker down, dont spend money on anything unneccessary. STARVE THIS SOCIALIST BEAST
And pull a Clevon Little on ourselves? Brilliant.
There's no revolution coming, guys. Not gonna happen. At least not in our lifetimes.
America is changing in a big way. It has been said by many, many politicans, leaders, prechers -- Whatever, that people yearn to be free.
That's crap. Most people yearn to be ruled. By a benevolent ruler, to be sure, but they still yearn to be ruled. To be told what to do, to have someone that will make sure they're not getting a raw deal. (in their minds)
That's always been the case. Always, always, always. You can find examples of it in the oldest writings in history, in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, etc, etc ad nauseam.
With one notable exception -- Americans. Over 235 years ago we tried something that no other race, no other culture in history has ever tried. We tried a country where the people rule the Government and not vice-versa.
It's worked for the most part. For the first 200 years, anyway. But now, the American Spirit is pretty much gone. We're not the same people we once were. Why? is another question entirely and one that can be debated infinitely. But it's gone.
Now we have a majority of people who don't want a governemnt of the people and by the people. They only want a government that's for the people. But our Country? It doesn't work without the first two -- "By" and "Of."
Can we reclaim our past? Can we save what's left of our grand experiment?
Maybe.
Posted by: Uncle Rick at December 19, 2009 08:11 AM (El8pC)
See also "Britain" and "Canada". Natasha Richardson can could have testified to the quality of emergency care in Canada.
Posted by: OCBill at December 19, 2009 08:14 AM (p28Ei)
"There's no revolution coming, guys."
Wanna bet? Not only was I a democrat, I voted for democrat for over 20 years consistently, theere were only 2 republicans I voted for Reagan and Palin!
and yes, I even voted for Dean in the 2004 primaries and then Kerry in the general. (yes, I know I'm very very sorry)
I am planning on cutting my staff even more than 2 if I have to preemptly, and it looks like I will have to.
THese people have not just pissed off conservatives, they have pissed off disgusted dems who are now independents. There is a reason why the number of independents are much higher thatn either party now.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 08:16 AM (ACkhT)
Call me an a$$hole if you'd like, but I just added a whole bunch of motherf*ckers to my ex-friends list.
I'm seriously done with people who think it's they're God-given right to dictate every decision that I make in my personal life (smoking, health care, hate speech, child-rearing, etc). Anybody who supports this bill is not only a f**king useless moron, but a reprehensible bastard who wants to destroy personal liberty.
I'm not going to accept, "They know not what they do" anymore.
They're all the f**king same, regardless of their intentions. Very, very un-Christian of me, but I will not associate with these evil, brain-washed a$$holes anymore. In my mind, these people are the same "types" who bought into and supported Hitler at each and every stop along the way, and then tried to disavow him later. SICKOS, every one.
Posted by: stickety at December 19, 2009 08:19 AM (Jg5C9)
In my mind, these people are the same "types" who bought into and supported Hitler at each and every stop along the way, and then tried to disavow him later. SICKOS, every one.
Yup.
Posted by: Uncle Rick at December 19, 2009 08:25 AM (El8pC)
Posted by: ddiddly at December 19, 2009 08:28 AM (JXF5g)
Right you are, GT. That's why I'm seriously looking for non-procedural, disobedient ideas. Voting the fuckers out won't work. When the hell ever are the most entrenched ones going to get voted out in our gerrymandered districts? Nancy Pelosi is one of the greatest villains in the country, and yet one of the safest seats in Congress. Writing letters and marching and voting aren't going to be enough.
You know, there's an important point there: If we could find a way to eliminate gerrymandering we could obviate a lot of the most leftist districts. A constitutional amendment that says that congressional districts have to be square, or something. Much evil in gerrymandering.
Posted by: joncelli at December 19, 2009 08:31 AM (Ko4Av)
Posted by: Larry Flynt at December 19, 2009 08:32 AM (AI3Lc)
johnc_recent_EX-democrat ,
I am very glad you are on board now! I will fight with you to the last man for Palin against these Neo-Marxists even if our cause is a lost one.
Posted by: Dan at December 19, 2009 08:33 AM (KZraB)
Hookers and blow?
Posted by: OregonMuse at December 19, 2009 08:37 AM (ySpdZ)
Here is my question...If congress can MANDATE that I MUST buy health insurance under penalty of law, then why can't they also mandate that I buy GE stock, or buy Al Gore's book? Insurance is just another product, so if they can force us to buy it, then really they have total control over our entire lives and can force us to do literally ANYTHING.
Posted by: Dan at December 19, 2009 08:39 AM (KZraB)
Posted by: eman at December 19, 2009 08:42 AM (yf/JJ)
If there is an insurance mandate then the next move is to appeal to the Supreme Court on the grounds that there is no constitutional authority to make people buy something. That could hold this travesty up for a while.
Posted by: joncelli at December 19, 2009 08:44 AM (Ko4Av)
How me this day is......
Posted by: Irony at December 19, 2009 08:44 AM (92zkk)
"if our cause is a lost one"
it is NOT lost
I have a small biz where I employ many recent immigrants or very recent naturalized US citizens. I learn so much from them and ashamed how ignorant of American history I am.
Alhtough in 1776 the dec of independence was written, the war went on for more than 5 years. 1/3 staunchly fought against the british, 1/3 fought for the british, and the remaining 1/3 didn't care one way or another.
We have now a govt that is unresponsive to the public. As far as I am concerned, and millions like they do not represent me or the interests of America.
The US govt is supposed to be bound by the US Constitution, this US govt consists of masters who do not believe that. THIS HAS TO BE FOUGHT.
People are a tipping point, they are being pushed and pushed. and THEY WILL PUSH BACK and SEVERELY!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 19, 2009 08:45 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Irony at December 19, 2009 08:46 AM (92zkk)
I am very glad you are on board now! I will fight with you to the last man for Palin against these Neo-Marxists even if our cause is a lost one.
There's nothing 'Neo' about them. They're the same marxists we've been fighting for the last 100 years.
Let's face it guys and gals -- We lost. It's over. We're done.
Sure, we defeated Economic marxism. We showed it for what it was. Even the Chinese are moving away from it and into a Technocracy. Which is more like Fascism than marxism.
But we lost the cultural battle to Social marxism decades ago. PC isn't about tolerance, it's about the defeat of anything that isn't pre-approved by marxist dimscum in politics, Hollywood and in academe.
Think I'm kidding? You better look around. We lost. Get used to it.
I mean, when a great and patriotic American, such as the owner of this site, goes on a rant chastising posters for being un-PC? We're done.
When a good and decent man like Senator Allen has his career ruined for calling someone a 'Macaca' (whatever the hell that is) and dimscum can call women 'bitches' and 'whores'? When a piece of filth like Al Franken can get elected to the hallowed halls of the US Senate? When Bill Clinton can rape and molest women and get away with it?
I could go on and on, but that would get tiresome.
To avert the inevitable, "What can we do?" question, I'll answer it in advance -- "Nothing. Just try to survive."
Posted by: Uncle Rick at December 19, 2009 08:51 AM (El8pC)
One step we might want to take is to start fighting for tougher voting requirements at the state level.
You want to stop these lunatics - pass strict state laws that require valid identification and address confirmation prior to voting.
You wonder how Reagan won such huge landslides: IT WAS PRE-MOTOR VOTER. People actually had to WANT to vote - they had to be ambitious enough to get themselves registered to vote. Not so, anymore.
Posted by: stickety at December 19, 2009 08:53 AM (Jg5C9)
Posted by: Herr Blücher at December 19, 2009 09:04 AM (E82UK)
I actually think this is unconstitutional, but I have no faith in the Supreme Court saving us.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 19, 2009 09:14 AM (4DwVn)
I agree with whoever said we need a strike day. A few days where people call in sick. A few million people not reporting in for work should make an impact.
The thing I worry about is the GOP will regain control next year and be stupid. Many in the GOP still buy in to earmarks, and when there isn't this big bogeyman to unite against because they have power, will the GOP screw up? They have a hell of a record of messing things up and suddenly losing their spine.
Posted by: linlithgow at December 19, 2009 09:30 AM (xpBkP)
"We" the people started losing this fight for the soul of the country 50 or more years ago. What started as the "beat" movement and the civil rights movement (which was co-opted by, but not started by marxists) has evolved into the ultra-PC movement. They won, the rest of America lost. Because most of America didn't know they were even in the fight.
Socialists have done a great job of shaping the battlefield for the hearts and minds of the "huddled masses". They've used political correctness long before it was called that to re-define current terms, and define the new ones. We've been playing in their house, by their rules, for two generations.
Sadly, they've been so successful that most Americans can't wrap their heads around what exactly is a right, what is a privelege, and what is pure redistribution. Ask someone where their rights come from, and I'll bet most people say our rights come from the government.
We lost. But the "war" isn't over. it's just one game, it's a long season, insert sports cliches hee
Posted by: OneEyedJack at December 19, 2009 09:33 AM (Poe30)
Posted by: Blutarsky at December 19, 2009 09:42 AM (B5cM9)
Posted by: bowel movement at December 19, 2009 09:43 AM (Fd5yK)
What is this bill?
From what I gather, it forces everyone to buy health insurance. In other words, it's similar somewhat to when they passed laws requiring car owners to buy, at a minimum, liability coverage. Except, you know, if you don't own a car you don't have to buy insurance. Since everyone has a body they use on a regular basis, you must have coverage. Are you young and not in need of insurance? Fuck you. Buy it or else. Don't want to buy it for whatever reason? Fuck you. Buy it or else. Don't have a job? Fuck you. You must have coverage. It's pure coercion by law. The bete noire of conservative individualism.
The left is also screaming mad about the bill because of the lack of single payer. The bill relies on the insurance companies (those big bad corporations that control the universe) to cover tens of millions of new customers. Of course, the gubmint will cough up billions to pay for insurance on behalf of the parasites...those folks who've never had a job and have no plans on ever working a day in their lives. The left doesn't care. They're mad because the insurance companies get millions of new customers with all the profit that entails.
Cui bono? Insurance companies, for one. They get millions of new customers who must pay for coverage. Whether the government or the individual pays, the insurance company benefits. Even mandates about pre-existing conditions could likely be offset by the influx of waves of new customers.
Cui bono? Lawyers. With tens of millions of newly insured customers comes millions of new opportunities for lawsuits. A significant chunk of profits the insurance companies expected to receive through their new customers will likely go right back out the door to the lawyers suing because Doc Brown left a surgical sponge in Jerry's chest cavity. Or because Jerry didn't get fifty tests to confirm his sinusitis. Whatever. The lawyers are rubbing their hands in glee over the potential for even greater lucrative lawsuits.
Cui bono? The government. Now that they've got their meat hooks deep into the health insurance industry, they can start spreading their poison into the system. More mandates. Price controls and rationing. Politically correct laws passed to guarantee "more" minority access to health care. The government, while not jumping wholly into single payer, is now a major player in your health care decisions. God help us.
We're fucked, basically. The right loses on the grounds of individual freedom and the left loses their desire for an outright socialist program controlling 1/6th of the country's economy. The left will likely lose even more when public outrage results in a thrashing at the polls in 2010 that will make 1994 look like a lover's embrace.
Is that about it? Do I essentially understand what's at stake here? I think so, and it sucks. There are people benefiting from this bill, but it ain't you, me, or your moonbat co-worker. Unless your a government employee or a lawyer involved in health care lawsuits, that is.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at December 19, 2009 10:11 AM (P33XN)
Posted by: Drusilla at December 19, 2009 12:42 PM (SFp6y)
I know, I was thinking the same. I was going to bed and then decided to see what y'all were saying. *sigh*
It's the powerlessness of the people that gets me. Nothing will ever hurt these elitist assholes and that's what sucks the most. Now everyone will know how Californians feel, heh.
Posted by: wherestherum at December 19, 2009 03:54 AM (gofDd)
Why are we powerless? Where is our creativity? Our imagination? When d we simply say, "No."?
Posted by: Drusilla at December 19, 2009 01:57 PM (SFp6y)
If it doesn't...well, I've never been too terribly wrapped up with preservation of the establishment anyway, and of course their brilliant leadership got us to this state, so if this bill passes I really have to wonder why we need the GOP at all--I think a third party could do it better, at least for a decade or so before the rot starts sinking in. We would also seem to be no worse off losing with a third party than "winning" with the GOP. So...
GOP--your shield, back with it or on it. I understand the difficulties, don't really care anymore.
Have a nice day.
Posted by: Horatius at December 19, 2009 02:00 PM (evMRo)
What really gripes me is: NOBODY has sued ANYBODY over Obama's leaning on Chrysler's primary bondholders to accept a puny percentage and allow the unions' claims to be elevated over them (instead of a normal and orderly bankruptcy and unwinding of the assets). NOBODY has sued ANYBODY over Obama's demand that GM's CEO should resign. This damn healthcare "reform" will pass and all citizens will be required to purchase insurance and nobody's going to call "foul" on that either.
WHY IN THE HELL HAS 11 MONTHS OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIONS BY THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION BEEN TOTALLY IGNORED, even by the GOP which stands to benefit if mis- or malfeasance is demonstrated?
What good is a "nation of laws" if nobody calls out the abuse of those laws?
Posted by: A_Nonny_Mouse at December 19, 2009 06:16 PM (mneg3)
Toss Congress into Boston Harbor? In the dead of winter, not when it's warm out. Posted by: wherestherum at December 19, 2009 03:31 AM
========================================
Count me in, but I don't think I can heft Dirty Harry over the gunwales all by myself... need more volunteers.
Posted by: A_Nonny_Mouse at December 19, 2009 06:23 PM (mneg3)
The Indiana Secretary of State did sue because Indiana was a bondholder.
He lost through some legal maneuvering. (And probably someone was paid off, too.)
But at least our SOS did sue.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 19, 2009 06:27 PM (4DwVn)
Posted by: custom promotional prodcuts at June 03, 2010 12:36 AM (mYNod)
<a href="http://www.toyourbaby.com">cool kids clothes</a>
Posted by: join at July 28, 2010 11:53 PM (nQKPk)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2697 seconds, 521 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: t-bone at December 18, 2009 10:20 PM (Xpxvu)