December 09, 2009
— DrewM Well, that's not going to happen but Palin's Op-ed is a good primer of the ClimateGate scandal. Most interesting to me is not her recap or call for Obama to stay home but a few paragraphs on her personal experience with the issue.
This scandal obviously calls into question the proposals being pushed in Copenhagen. I've always believed that policy should be based on sound science, not politics. As governor of Alaska, I took a stand against politicized science when I sued the federal government over its decision to list the polar bear as an endangered species despite the fact that the polar bear population had more than doubled. I got clobbered for my actions by radical environmentalists nationwide, but I stood by my view that adding a healthy species to the endangered list under the guise of "climate change impacts" was an abuse of the Endangered Species Act. This would have irreversibly hurt both Alaska's economy and the nation's, while also reducing opportunities for responsible development.Our representatives in Copenhagen should remember that good environmental policymaking is about weighing real-world costs and benefits -- not pursuing a political agenda. That's not to say I deny the reality of some changes in climate -- far from it. I saw the impact of changing weather patterns firsthand while serving as governor of our only Arctic state. I was one of the first governors to create a subcabinet to deal specifically with the issue and to recommend common-sense policies to respond to the coastal erosion, thawing permafrost and retreating sea ice that affect Alaska's communities and infrastructure.
But while we recognize the occurrence of these natural, cyclical environmental trends, we can't say with assurance that man's activities cause weather changes. We can say, however, that any potential benefits of proposed emissions reduction policies are far outweighed by their economic costs...
If nothing else, this is a prime example of the power of ClimateGate. Palin never would have gotten a Climate Change op-ed piece published without the news hook of the scandal. Yes, the coverage has been less than stellar and honest at times but the embargo is broken and we have a breach in the narrative ("the science is settled") we can exploit.
Naturally the left is freaking out that the Post gave Palin this platform. Funny but they are never that upset when the Post or NY Times turns their Op-ed page over to terrorists.
All in all, a solid piece from Palin that annoys all the right people. What's not to love?
Posted by: DrewM at
07:45 AM
| Comments (188)
Post contains 438 words, total size 3 kb.
Funny but they are never that upset when the Post or NY Times turns their Op-ed page over to terrorists.
I was really hoping the link would link to Obama.
Posted by: Barc at December 09, 2009 07:48 AM (ia/06)
Posted by: Al at December 09, 2009 07:49 AM (0lyUI)
Posted by: ParisParamus at December 09, 2009 07:50 AM (VKn7o)
Climategate + Palin = Absoilute Panic.
Posted by: lincolntf at December 09, 2009 07:51 AM (EJAGr)
Posted by: bill-tb at December 09, 2009 07:52 AM (y+QfZ)
Posted by: Aunt Cunty Mccockbitch at December 09, 2009 07:54 AM (hYq6q)
Posted by: Jean at December 09, 2009 07:55 AM (7K04W)
Posted by: Techie at December 09, 2009 07:57 AM (wVPwI)
Posted by: Rufus Ridgewater at December 09, 2009 07:57 AM (Vui52)
Posted by: Charles Johnson at December 09, 2009 07:58 AM (IhQuA)
I also think that Palin is the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar.
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 09, 2009 07:58 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Vic at December 09, 2009 07:59 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: nickless at December 09, 2009 07:59 AM (MMC8r)
Her political careeeeeer is over. The woman is a joke....blah blah blah.
It's all wishful thinking. This gal can write an op-ed anytime she likes and put it in 80% of the print media in this country because she is in demand.
We haven't had anyone with drawing power like that on our side in a long, long time.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 08:00 AM (v0kvW)
Posted by: David Brooks at December 09, 2009 08:01 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: Bosk at December 09, 2009 08:02 AM (pUO5u)
Posted by: Ratings Plumpkin at December 09, 2009 08:02 AM (hYq6q)
Posted by: JOhn at December 09, 2009 08:02 AM (6FYZ6)
I bet Axelrod is wishing she was still Governor, less popular and 7 million dollars poorer, its funny how his little plan backfired in his face.
Posted by: x11b1p at December 09, 2009 08:04 AM (ejoAx)
Posted by: Mephitis at December 09, 2009 08:06 AM (ehXLT)
It's always been this way. What Palin needs to do is raise money for other candidates for office. She needs allies on the ballots to even have a shot. This game isn't played with promises. It's played with money.
At this point in 2005 Senator Obama had already raised over 3 million dollars for his Hope PAC. Now he's a two faced liar, but he was a two faced liar back then as well. Now he's a world renown two faced liar.
Posted by: WTFCI at December 09, 2009 08:08 AM (GtYrq)
*It is no longer possible to hide the decline of a once great newspaper, no longer possible to hide the decline of the paper that broke the Watergate story, but is now hanging itself on the Climategate story (as James Fallows argues in his blog).
The newspaper that just editorialized, “Many — including us — find global warming deniers’ claims irresponsible,” has just published a grotesquely irresponsible and falsehood-filled piece on climate science and the hacked emails by that leading light of science, ex-Governor Sarah Palin. This is a woman that recently embraced the fact-free birthers.
Palin is so practiced at repeating falsehoods — even in her supposed area of expertise (energy) — that during last year’s presidential campaign, the Washington Post itself gave her its highest (which is to say lowest) rating of “Four Pinocchios” for continuing to “to peddle bogus [energy] statistics three days after the original error was pointed out by independent fact-checkers.” And then in July, the WashPost let her publish a falsehood-filled piece attacking climate action and clean energy.
And now they publish this unmitigated tabloid nonsense:
The e-mails reveal that leading climate “experts” deliberately destroyed records, manipulated data to “hide the decline” in global temperatures….
No, they donÂ’t reveal that.
Posted by: I am an idiot at December 09, 2009 08:08 AM (SqAkN)
I bet Axelrod is wishing she was still Governor, less popular and 7 million dollars poorer, its funny how his little plan backfired in his face.
That's a very good point. The MSM/Obama hit squad has gone so far out of their way to kill her career that when she rises above them (in the polls, public respect, etc.) than what does that say about her tormentors? That they are shortsighted twits.
Posted by: lincolntf at December 09, 2009 08:12 AM (EJAGr)
Posted by: Jean at December 09, 2009 08:13 AM (PjevJ)
Posted by: Zorachus at December 09, 2009 08:14 AM (qc/CQ)
Posted by: Mephitis at December 09, 2009 08:14 AM (ehXLT)
Posted by: Schlippy at December 09, 2009 08:14 AM (hYq6q)
@28
SHEESH! Somebody should tell Mr. Romm that arrogance and stupidity is a very unbecoming basis for a personality.
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 09, 2009 08:15 AM (OtQXp)
Yes, that, that right there. I posted a little rant the other day over at DPud that one of the things that has always peeved me about Global Warmening is that the fight about whether or not it's caused by man overshadows legitimate environmental concerns. I'm no greenie but I am concerned about open pit mining, benzine contamination, strip mining down mountaintops to get the mercury to put into CFLs and Prius batteries, landfull usage, gas leakage from old tanks and other such matters. Why aren't we using nearly all nukes for power like in France? (I'll go flog myself over complimenting the French momentarily) What about water table contamination? Is nanotech getting us to the point where solar will be cost efficient? That's what I care about.
Instead of addressing actual problems, we fight about whether or not exhaling is going to kill the planet. Crikey.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 09, 2009 08:15 AM (8WZWv)
In general, though: awesome.
Posted by: Zorachus at December 09, 2009 12:14 PM (qc/CQ)
That was an issue being pushed by The Charles so just consider the source.
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 09, 2009 08:17 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Jean at December 09, 2009 08:17 AM (qU2w5)
If you can find evidence she's ever tried to force her religious views on others, then that would be material. From what I've read, though, she does a better job of keeping her religion out of her policy than does the Sainted Al Gore.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at December 09, 2009 08:19 AM (ZJ/un)
http://tiny.cc/7yQCM
I bet that will get businesses to start hiring (I hear higher costs on everything spur job growth).
Posted by: Hedgehog at December 09, 2009 08:20 AM (oQIfB)
Yes, that, that right there. I posted a little rant the other day over at DPud that one of the things that has always peeved me about Global Warmening is that the fight about whether or not it's caused by man overshadows legitimate environmental concerns. I'm no greenie but I am concerned about open pit mining, benzine contamination, strip mining down mountaintops to get the mercury to put into CFLs and Prius batteries, landfull usage, gas leakage from old tanks and other such matters. Why aren't we using nearly all nukes for power like in France? (I'll go flog myself over complimenting the French momentarily) What about water table contamination? Is nanotech getting us to the point where solar will be cost efficient? That's what I care about.
Instead of addressing actual problems, we fight about whether or not exhaling is going to kill the planet. Crikey.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 09, 2009 12:15 PM (8WZWv)
Excellent comment! +100
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at December 09, 2009 08:20 AM (Vu6sl)
Sounds like time to do some more shopping over at ammoengine.com.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at December 09, 2009 08:20 AM (ZJ/un)
But wait... I've got a new novel out about the Revolutionary war that I wrote with the help of two other guys that's really really fascinating!
Posted by: Neuter Gingrich at December 09, 2009 08:20 AM (Oxen1)
Posted by: Charles Johnson at December 09, 2009 08:22 AM (SqAkN)
To recycle an old feminist saying: there are maybe half a dozen jobs where someone's beliefs on that subject actually matter, and none of them are in politics.
Posted by: Ian S. at December 09, 2009 08:24 AM (p05LM)
I did not get the impression that she is a Bible literalist in any way.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 08:24 AM (v0kvW)
Why aren't we using nearly all nukes for power like in France? (I'll go flog myself over complimenting the French momentarily)
We aren't using nukes for power because the green assholes hijacked this issue in the '70's. My dad was in nuclear power research then and the enviroassholes started filing lawsuits at every juncture during the process of building nuke plants. the companies that had the permits (over 30) decided that they didn't want to tie up millions in resources fighting the court battles and gave up. They are sitting on many of those permits now.
All the while, a large American company recently got a huge contract to build Nuclear power reactors from............China.
Posted by: Hedgehog at December 09, 2009 08:26 AM (oQIfB)
Man, I just got home with a speeding ticket in my hand.
I needed something to cheer me up. This works for me. Thanks DrewM!
Posted by: Jade Sea at December 09, 2009 08:26 AM (f2QL0)
Why aren't we using nearly all nukes for power like in France?
I started to doubt the intentions of greenies when they opposed common sense solutions to the problems they bitched so loudly about. Thanks to them, we haven't built a new nuke plant in some thirty years.
Now they're advocating pie-in-the-sky things like solar (only works when it's sunny) and wind (only works when it's windy) that are intermittent in nature and require large batteries to begin to be feasable. They's obviously never heard of the laws of physics. And how many times has The Vapid One© mentioned "weatherization" as the panacea that we're all looking for.
Thank goodness for ClimateGate. It's exactly what us skeptics have needed to debunk the hoax. And debunk it we will.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 09, 2009 08:26 AM (ZGhSv)
Posted by: Seriously at December 09, 2009 08:26 AM (tXkq9)
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 08:27 AM (v0kvW)
Posted by: Uniball at December 09, 2009 08:27 AM (27iEn)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 09, 2009 08:27 AM (xGIqT)
Posted by: Hedgehog at December 09, 2009 08:28 AM (oQIfB)
Barry said one way to get us out of this economic mess is to use some of the TARP money to subsidize home weatherization projects.
Fuck yeah...I have a caulking gun...I'm gonna be rich...filthy stinkin' rich I tell ya
Cash for Caulkers!!!
Posted by: beedubya at December 09, 2009 08:29 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 08:30 AM (v0kvW)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 09, 2009 08:31 AM (QECjC)
Odd. Love Canal had bugger-all to do with nuclear.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at December 09, 2009 08:32 AM (ZJ/un)
If you're an anti-Semite, then I'm a Jew.
The same principle applies to Sarah Palin, aside from her sheer personal awesomeness.
Posted by: Truman North at December 09, 2009 08:33 AM (e8YaH)
I suspect a lot of her wishy-washy behavior is more political positioning than actual belief on her part. I guess we'll see.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 08:34 AM (v0kvW)
1) PDS is an expression of fear. Anger is almost always a secondary emotion; a response to fear.
2) If you hear a lefty talk about Mrs. Palin without foaming at the mouth, s/he may be more afraid of Obama's damage to their cause than a Palin presidency.
3) Wapo realizes that if they don't give Mrs. Palin an OpEd, people will read the same thing on Facebook. They've got to fluff their numbers somehow.
I think Palin is most effective when she's got just a sling and five smooth stones going up against a giant. In this mode she has won over and over again. The opposition must understand this David & Goliath dynamic and are desperately seeking Palin-countermeasures.
Posted by: Steve Poling at December 09, 2009 08:34 AM (nBrFn)
Burn the squish!!
Posted by: John Galt at December 09, 2009 08:35 AM (F/4zf)
Odd. Love Canal had bugger-all to do with nuclear.
Correct, but that doesn't stop people on the fringe of awareness from thinking "pollution" and jumping to the conclusion that storing spent nuclear fuel nearby will turn them all into that guy in RoboCop that gets hit by the car.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 08:36 AM (v0kvW)
I guess their permit process is a bit simpler than ours.
Posted by: Hedgehog at December 09, 2009 08:39 AM (oQIfB)
@59
... and so all anyone has to do is say "Nuke Power" and the throngs of idiots think you want to turn everything into Chernobyl or Love Canal.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 12:30 PM (v0kvW)
This is something else that we have to "thank" Jane Fonda for- that masterful work of luddite propaganda: "The China Syndrome" went a long way towards scaring off public support for nuclear power.
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 09, 2009 08:40 AM (OtQXp)
Barry said one way to get us out of this economic mess is to use some of the TARP money to subsidize home weatherization projects
That would be the same money Timmy Geithner wants to use to continue TARP. Funny how that works. When I try to use the same money twice, I get charged an overdraft fee.
Posted by: huerfano at December 09, 2009 08:40 AM (vtuZz)
Now they're advocating pie-in-the-sky things like solar (only works when it's sunny) and wind (only works when it's windy)
The left really only advocates these power generating schemes until the rubber hits the road, much like their support for the "good" war in Afghanistan. When it comes time for implementation, they will pivot.Wind farms off Santa Barbara or Martha's Vineyard, no can do, destroys the view. And when the fashion changes they will find a new emotion. Wind turbines endanger our avian friends. Solar panels damage the desert tortoise habitat. Paper grocery bags harm trees, use plastic, no, wait! Plastic bags kill the fishes, use paper.
It never ends...
Posted by: Flying Monkey at December 09, 2009 08:40 AM (Oxen1)
_ http://tiny.cc/pJ9Al
Posted by: Hedgehog at December 09, 2009 08:42 AM (oQIfB)
Posted by: David Frum, More Cracked- Than Crunchy-Con at December 09, 2009 08:44 AM (50S+L)
Posted by: maddogg at December 09, 2009 08:45 AM (OlN4e)
@ 72
Right on. The only thing greenies are serious about is ridding the earth of humans, something I'm OK with.
They can go first. I'll be along later, God willing.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 09, 2009 08:45 AM (ZGhSv)
Barry said one way to get us out of this economic mess is to use some of the TARP money to subsidize home weatherization projects.
Fuck yeah...I have a caulking gun...I'm gonna be rich...filthy stinkin' rich I tell ya
Make sure your tires are really full of air and you'll be double super rich!
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 09, 2009 08:45 AM (Be4xl)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 09, 2009 08:46 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 09, 2009 08:47 AM (DIYmd)
Posted by: JohnW at December 09, 2009 08:47 AM (I6zOf)
Agree 100%. This movie is actually taught in school (or at least, it was in my science class) when discussing nuclear power.
The schools have to be retaken.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 08:47 AM (v0kvW)
all anyone has to do is say "Nuke Power" and the throngs of idiots think you want to turn everything into Chernobyl or Love Canal.
I invented Love Canal!! I mean, it was based on me. I mean...
Me! Me me me!
Posted by: Al Gore at December 09, 2009 08:47 AM (Be4xl)
IIRC, the genius Reid killed that off.
He helped that idiot Energy Secretary kill it off and congress de-funded it. The funny thing is that the law Bush signed in 2002 stated that we should begin to build the site to accept nuke waste. It has just been ignored.
_ http://tiny.cc/Cj8WM
Posted by: Hedgehog at December 09, 2009 08:49 AM (oQIfB)
Posted by: Inspectorudy at December 09, 2009 08:49 AM (Vo1wX)
People forget that in the early 60s, the greenies were all in favor of nuclear energy, which they saw as a good way to to eliminate the pollution caused by oil and coal consumption.
Then when nuclear power became feasible, they suddenly were against it, and started heavily pushing solar power instead
Now you can read articles in greenie publications about the environmental dangers of solar power and the environmental dangers of manufacturing solar panels. So they'll come out totally against it before too long.
So, in other words, the greenies are only in favor of technology that doesn't exist, yet. As soon as it does, they'll oppose it. This is how they disguise their Luddism.
Posted by: OregonMuse at December 09, 2009 08:50 AM (tClfg)
Meanwhile, the WSJ demolishes Harry Reid with faint prais...
well actually they peg him pretty well for the flaming a-hole he is.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 09, 2009 08:51 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Truman North at December 09, 2009 08:52 AM (e8YaH)
i like Al Gore's response, essentially saying it is a law of physics, like gravity.
The sooner that snake oil salesman is called on what he is the better,
Posted by: Ben at December 09, 2009 08:53 AM (wuv1c)
Im telling ya, all you guys who like her but think she is unelectable or cant get the nomination even, it is going to knock you right on your ass when it happens.
You have never seen this woman in a campaign THAT SHE RUNS. Next time, she will call the shots. You are not going to believe how well she does campaigning. It will be unlike anything youve ever seen. She will bring NEW people into the process. It is already happening. There are millions of young girls right now looking at her who arent polled. They will be over 18 by 2012. That is just one facet of Sarah Palin's power.
The left and the elite GOP had no idea who they were messing with when they tried to destroy her. I can't wat for you all to see it.
Posted by: Dan at December 09, 2009 08:53 AM (KZraB)
"...good environmental policymaking is about weighing real-world costs and benefits -- not pursuing a political agenda."
That's a keeper, and so is Sarah.
Posted by: sherlock at December 09, 2009 08:54 AM (h6sl7)
Posted by: LikeATimeBomb at December 09, 2009 08:58 AM (dwwPD)
hot, smart, witty, yeah, sarah is da man
and i still hate todd palin more and more
ot: here i am at starbucks. i just spent 6 bucks on a fucking coffee, how in the hell can anyone justify spending 6 bucks on a fucking coffee?!!!! oh, and if it takes longer to order a coffee than to make it, then you suck
and all these apple laptops i see? wtf? i hate starbucks!! beta male hairy armpitted liberal hippies
($100 says MiM works/worked at a starbucks)
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 09, 2009 08:59 AM (ZGJpl)
Posted by: Lincoln Adams at December 09, 2009 09:00 AM (gLNLT)
Posted by: LikeATimeBomb at December 09, 2009 09:01 AM (dwwPD)
"Yet because of the power of E = mc2, the metamorphosis of six ounces of matter will be enough to power the city of San Francisco for five years."
Solar, wind etc are all a fuckin fraud.
Posted by: Hedgehog at December 09, 2009 09:03 AM (oQIfB)
Are there mirrors or reflective glass in Starbucks? Apparently there's, um, a market for it.
Posted by: Econ 101 at December 09, 2009 09:05 AM (50S+L)
Obama postponed his trip to the very end, so that in case these two weeks make the conference into a joke or disaster he could, at the last minute, come up with some reason to cancel and not be involved in said disaster. He needs this to be a successful Copenhagen trip, otherwise the public will slam him for TWO big Copenhagen failures.
Now along comes Sarah telling him not to go. So now there is no way he can NOT go. Obama has been forced to go to Copenhagen and publicly believe in it, wholeheartedly.
Sarah tied this albatross firmly around his neck. I love her!
Posted by: Less at December 09, 2009 09:05 AM (PGXeZ)
@81
Agree 100%. This movie is actually taught in school (or at least, it was in my science class) when discussing nuclear power.
The schools have to be retaken.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 12:47 PM (v0kvW)
As a long term goal I agree, but in the short term I just taught Little Nighthawk how to recognize propaganda (http://tinyurl.com/ylaelr4). She's in college now and driving her professors crazy...
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 09, 2009 09:06 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Econ 101 at December 09, 2009 09:06 AM (50S+L)
Posted by: Barack ODoofus at December 09, 2009 09:07 AM (ktYjH)
101 i know where you can get a coffee for 6 bucks
if i didn't love my wife so much i would have slapped her, 6 bucks
(actually, although she is a tiny little thing, my wife scares the living hell out of me)
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 09, 2009 09:09 AM (ZGJpl)
Just read this little GEM of a comment on there. Do they really think if they attribute all of Obamas gaffs to Palin and say it loud enough and long enough that it will become fact? The one that particularly got me was the bolwing special olympics reference... I seem to recall that Al'Bama had to call the head of the special olympics and apologize for saying this? Hmmm maybe all the videos on those no good right wing "wingnut" websites like "Youtube" are wrong. All edited... Every one...
"Remember during the election when that dunce Palin spelled that "three-letter word" J-O-B-S? Remember when she said she'd been campaigning in 57 states? Remember when she said Roosevelt went on TV at the start of the depression, despite the fact that he was not president and nobody owned a TV? Remember when she compared her poor bowling skills to a "special Olympics" athlete? What an idiot! Can you believe she ever got so close to the White House?!"
Posted by: c02 emitting conservative at December 09, 2009 09:09 AM (SebJz)
Posted by: katya at December 09, 2009 09:09 AM (t+Dxj)
Posted by: TheQuietman at December 09, 2009 09:11 AM (1Jaio)
Sarah tied this albatross firmly around his neck.
Between Palin and Andrew Breitbart, whom are delivering simultaneous beat-downs, the left simply does not know what's hitting them.
It's like a saloon brawl in a western movie, where the guy gets punched in the face, staggers over to the bar only to have another guy smash a whiskey bottle over his head. That guy staggering around is the loony left. Breitbart punched him in the face and the bottle was wielded by Sarah Palin.
Posted by: OregonMuse at December 09, 2009 09:13 AM (tClfg)
106 no trolls yet
we all agree she's hawt
we love the way she makes the lefty heads explode
and i paid 6 bucks for a fucking coffee
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 09, 2009 09:13 AM (ZGJpl)
Posted by: katya at December 09, 2009 09:13 AM (t+Dxj)
BUT - the fact is, her answer on illegal immigration was pretty wishy-washy, and I suspect she's ultimately pro-amnesty.
Drat. I hope you're mistaken, or that she'll be enlightened. That was my primary concern over her. Still, there's two years to go. If that's my only problem with her, I might still go for it. Depends on who ends up being Governor of Texas, and who's running in the WasteOfAVote party. I'm damn sure the Democrat won't be pro-border enforcement.
And as a side note, I really hope she doesn't start sounding like just another politician in terms of giving gaseous answers that don't evaluate to anything in particular. That'd be a major disappointment.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at December 09, 2009 09:14 AM (pZEar)
I've always thought that each form of energy had its place. For example, solar never struck me as a viable way to mass produce energy for public consumption. It is excellent for taking 1 house off the grid with a HUGE investment that will never pay off financially - but perhaps with security. If you're looking to be self-sufficient, solar is a step in that direction, depending on geography and climate.
I think the article does a nice job in laying out where the real future is - nuclear.
I did read somewhere that the supply of nuclear fuel is rather limited. If, for the sake of argument, all electric power was generated from nukes, the fuel would run out in 250 years or something. I don't remember where I saw this.
Can anyone slap this down or back it up?
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 09:15 AM (v0kvW)
I missed the source on this. Link?
Posted by: Derak at December 09, 2009 09:16 AM (p/gmH)
Good point. Obama will do the reverse if possible not because it's a good idea necessarily but because it's what someone else recommends. He's outwardly contrarian for the sake of being contrarian just to be perceived as leader rather than follower. He has to be overtly "unprecedented."
Obama has shifted his Copenhagen schedule several times due to the rapidly changing political dynamic, and now he's tethered to it -- all because of a timely post from his most potent foe.
Delicious.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 09, 2009 09:17 AM (50S+L)
111 i got invited to starbucks by the wife so we could kick back and people watch before she had to get to work
we got two coffees and the dude said $12.35
i said american money? dirty looks ensued
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 09, 2009 09:17 AM (ZGJpl)
Posted by: Don't Tread On Me at December 09, 2009 09:18 AM (Heb2Y)
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 09:18 AM (v0kvW)
We're not in danger of running out of Uranium.
Posted by: Hedgehog at December 09, 2009 09:18 AM (oQIfB)
Sarah 2012 !!
Hey guys go and read the comments at WaPo ..the libs are freaking out !!!
Posted by: Pete-billy at December 09, 2009 09:19 AM (bUyW2)
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 09:21 AM (v0kvW)
hey, it's Tiger,
I need a huge favor. Remember that liberal bias you had? Yeah, I need you to get that back. My wife believes in global warming and she's probably gonna cancel her subscription to your newspaper. Will you do that for me?
Huge.
Quickly.
Alright, bye.
Posted by: hey, it's Tiger at December 09, 2009 09:21 AM (7/lTI)
the starbucks at ward center in honolulu, we got quad venti mochas
i can't really complain though, i got to sit with a hottie wearing 3in heels
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 09, 2009 09:21 AM (ZGJpl)
Ha! Now that I'd like to have seen. Well played. 'Cept for the actual transfer of currency.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 09, 2009 09:21 AM (50S+L)
hey, it's Tiger,
I need a huge favor. Remember that liberal bias you had? Yeah, I need you to get that back. My wife believes in global warming and she's probably gonna cancel her subscription to your newspaper. Will you do that for me?
Huge.
Quickly.
Alright, bye. Posted by: hey, it's Tiger at December 09, 2009 01:21 PM (7/lTI) Well played sir.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 09, 2009 09:24 AM (SqAkN)
But if the C-hagen deal looks iffy, like it won't actually happen, he probably won't go because that will just look like "Chicago Olympic Bid Fail II".
And either way, Palin comes out on the right side of the argument.
Suh-freakin'-weeeeet!
Posted by: Intrepid at December 09, 2009 09:25 AM (92zkk)
So the Washington Post gave Palestinian PM Ismael Haniyah space on the op-ed page to weigh in on current events.
While I understand why others (LGF, for instance) are upset at what appears to be legitimizing a leading voice for terror...
That's from the first line of the last link. Something tells me the LGF crowd wouldn't be upset about WaPo putting up an editorial from the Palestinean PM today, you know what I'm saying?
Posted by: Tom in Korea at December 09, 2009 09:26 AM (+gX1+)
Sarah Palin is a Brilliant Woman and a born leader. Sarah should now study Spanish so she can speak directly to the U.S.A's Latin American community as well. GWB spoke Spanish in his 2000 & 2004 campaigns and won many over with his Spanish. American latins are by and large, family oriented and church going. They are a natural constituency for her policies and programs. She has been front and center for Native Americans in Alaska and if uses the same approach with Latin American citizens she will cleave off a large portion of the Latin vote should she choose to run in 2012. This is the secret weapon that will put her over the top in 2012!~. Latin Americans voted for obama but many not happily having done so. PEBO has dissapointed many and they will flock to Sarah Palin and her values of Family, Country and faith!
P.S. Someone please forward this this note to Sarah Palin or her contacts.
Posted by: blogforce one at December 09, 2009 09:26 AM (hjn1y)
When will ergie weigh in?
Posted by: logprof at December 09, 2009 09:27 AM (I3Udb)
Posted by: Truman North at December 09, 2009 09:29 AM (e8YaH)
states' challenging the EPA, and partially winning on the Polar Bear issue, as with the offshore drilling. I'm kind of surprised that the post came from Drew M.
Posted by: ian cormac at December 09, 2009 09:29 AM (ZVOIU)
He did that the other day, and I'm now in need of repairs. Damned Krispy Kremes.
Posted by: Erg's bathroom scales at December 09, 2009 09:30 AM (92zkk)
The e-mails reveal that leading climate “experts” deliberately destroyed records, manipulated data to “hide the decline” in global temperatures….
No, they donÂ’t reveal that. (quoted)
--Do too! Do too!
Posted by: logprof at December 09, 2009 09:30 AM (I3Udb)
131 actually, as a half hispanic, our faith as catholics is really strong and we respect positions of power. also, most latinos want to work and do the right thing, they don't want hand-outs..most have too much pride
we don't respect obama because he's weak, so sarah will do fine with the latino vote
well, back to driving all the tourist vermin (yet i so love their folding cash...helps pay for that 6 dollar coffee, fucking 6 bucks)
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 09, 2009 09:33 AM (ZGJpl)
http://steveking.house.gov//_files/ACORNcookie_Display.jpg
Posted by: bulwark at December 09, 2009 09:36 AM (jvrmc)
Posted by: RushBabe at December 09, 2009 09:37 AM (LKkE8)
Obama: "Since you guys are solely responsible for screwing things up, you should help me fix them... but it will still be your fault... any I will get any credit...
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 09, 2009 09:37 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: kansas at December 09, 2009 09:37 AM (mka2b)
I did not get the impression that she is a Bible literalist in any way.
Posted by: grognard at December 09, 2009 12:24 PM (v0kvW)
Add to that the fact that she served on two of Alaska's oil and gas regulatory bodies (before and during her governorship). She understands where oil and gas come from and that the petroleum-bearing formations are millions, not thousands, of years old.
I am waiting for her to hold a press conference on Little Diomede Island where she can point across the channel and say, "See that other island over there? That is Russia, people. Now you too can tell the world that you stood on Alaskan soil and could see Russia."
Posted by: Rosie the Riveted at December 09, 2009 09:39 AM (Ate22)
--So that purse is actually made from otter fur?
Posted by: logprof at December 09, 2009 09:40 AM (I3Udb)
Left Wing Loon: Why don't you sit down and shut up?
Palin: What? Why don't I sit down and what?
Left Wing Loon: I said why don't you sit down and shut up?
Palin: Why don't anybody who wants me to sit down and shut up come down here and make me? Why don't any fifty of you who want me to sit down and shut up come down here just for the fun of it?
Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 09, 2009 09:40 AM (SqAkN)
Of course, it is no such thing. It's all-lefty propaganda all the time. Today, they had a sound clip from some "expert" whose basic premise was that we can't wait for science to accurately determine what is happening to the planet's climate; we have to do something now. This tells me that the AGW alarmists are getting desperate. They realize that the more the issue is examined, the more opposition they face, so that we need to take irremediable steps to implement their program.
BTW, the voice that introduces and signs off "Earth and Sky" sounds suspiciously like Dan Rather.
Posted by: lizardbrain at December 09, 2009 09:42 AM (fWdId)
Posted by: trainer at December 09, 2009 09:43 AM (K5X44)
Pics of Sarah and Hot Toddie at the Gridiron dinner, including the infamous otter purse.
Posted by: RushBabe at December 09, 2009 01:37 PM (LKkE
--But that's a story for an otter day.
[rimshot]
Thank you! I'll be here all week.
Posted by: logprof at December 09, 2009 09:46 AM (I3Udb)
Posted by: alexthechick at December 09, 2009 12:15 PM (8WZWv)
A modest proposal to provide an essentially unlimited source of energy for human use.
1) Build a manufacturing facility on the Moon to extract raw materials for photovoltaic cells and the building materials for the phase 2 project.
2) Use the materials from phase 1 to build a belt of photovoltaic cells many kilometers wide around the Moon's equator. Equip the belt with robotic systems for maintenance, repair, and surface cleaning of dust and micrometeorite debris.
3) Concurrent with phase 2, build relay stations in Earth orbit (or at Lagrangian L4 and L5 points with respect to the Earth and Moon), as well as receiver stations on Earth.
4) Switch on the system. The photovoltaics on the Moon convert sunlight to electricity without any atmosphere to reduce incidence of solar radiation; the electricity gets converted to microwave energy and relayed to Earth.
Because the photovoltaics form a belt all the way around the Moon's equator, half of the belt is always in sunshine. The system is always on, without regard for weather.
Posted by: stuiec at December 09, 2009 09:49 AM (Ate22)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 09, 2009 09:53 AM (NtiET)
Posted by: RushBabe at December 09, 2009 09:57 AM (LKkE8)
A couple of thoughts:
1. Barney Frank looks like jabba the hut
2. Otters have been a protected species for a while. I'm thinking that Alaskan Natives can hunt them, and that purse is hand made by one of her relatives. Sarah prizes her family's heritage, screw the PC peta crowd.
3. Todd Palin makes me swoon. Yikes!
Posted by: Derak at December 09, 2009 09:57 AM (p/gmH)
Posted by: Bosk at December 09, 2009 09:59 AM (pUO5u)
Read her book.
Posted by: Cooper at December 09, 2009 11:52 AM (DXHVe)
If you do, you learn that she accomplished in less than two years as Governor what most Governors, Senators and Congressmen achieve in their full lifetimes of public service. And you learn that she applied common sense to apply enough leverage to Exxon-Mobil to get them to start drilling on an unused lease (the "drill it or lose it" gambit that later the Democrats, of all people, adopted as their own) and to get the AGIA gasline project off top-dead-center, where it had been for 25 years. She's not one of those "idea people" or great orators who express Deep Thoughts that somehow never make an iota of difference in people's lives. She's a doer -- and that makes "idea people" like Frum and Brooks feel sad, inadequate and threatened.
Posted by: stuiec at December 09, 2009 09:59 AM (Ate22)
Posted by: Adlib at December 09, 2009 10:04 AM (k/CNO)
Posted by: Bosk at December 09, 2009 10:07 AM (pUO5u)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 09, 2009 10:18 AM (NtiET)
Posted by: Gravity Dick at December 09, 2009 10:28 AM (U0oFg)
Posted by: Al Gore's Meter Reader at December 09, 2009 10:32 AM (4fc2a)
--So that purse is actually made from otter fur?
Posted by: logprof at December 09, 2009 01:40 PM (I3Udb)
That's the story. I think it was made by Todd's grandmother, a native Alaskan.
Posted by: RushBabe at December 09, 2009 10:38 AM (LKkE8)
Posted by: Al Gore's Meter Reader at December 09, 2009 10:41 AM (4fc2a)
Posted by: Def Leppard at December 09, 2009 10:55 AM (hIOnV)
Yeah, and Fox News has an AP story on their site. "U.N. Weather Agency at Climate Conference Says This Is Warmest Decade on Record".
I would love to know why the fuck an allegedly conservative news outlet gives distribution to horseshit like this. The AP sucks, has sucked, and will continue to suck. This is how supposed conservatives like my own dad become confused on the climate issue.
Posted by: SGT Dan at December 09, 2009 11:00 AM (GgXZc)
And the rest of the Pubbies are hiding under their desks. Inhofe excepted, of course. McCain is back to talking to unemployed teenagers dressed up as Polar Bears - his personal environmental mentors.
Meanwhile, in another part of the Republican galaxy, Michael Steele is busily jerking off to his own photo in a stall in a men's room.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 09, 2009 11:02 AM (hgrfT)
I hate otters. You can't believe how much trash they leave on the tables at McDonalds.
Damn otters.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 09, 2009 11:08 AM (hgrfT)
There's no point in ignoring the fact that 90% of the news that Americans get from their newspapers has been vetted by Leftist acivists at AP. Fox putting up an AP article full of lies and distortons is the best way to nullify the effect of such stories and expose the AP as a political special interest group as opposed to a news aggregator.
Posted by: lincolntf at December 09, 2009 11:14 AM (EJAGr)
Posted by: JEA at December 09, 2009 11:20 AM (H7yeS)
Posted by: JEA at December 09, 2009 03:20 PM (H7yeS)
Why not? You trust a lawyer who barely even practiced law to address every single complex issue of governance in the United States.
I'd trust a former governor of an oil-producing state who served on her state's oil and gas commissions before and during her governorship and one who also pushed for a target of 50 percent renewable energy in her state (up from the 25 percent she actually achieved) over that lawyer, or the statisticians who pass themselves off as atmospheric chemists and physicists, or people who make facile, uninformed, stupid comments about politicians.
Posted by: stuiec at December 09, 2009 11:35 AM (Ate22)
Posted by: JEA at December 09, 2009 03:20 PM (H7yeS)
First, please offer evidence that she "barely graduated".
Second, when you find a copy of ObaMao's transcripts, proof that he wrote either of his books, or any other evidence that he's not a total fucking idiot, please get back to me.
Third, unlike the Ivy-Leaugue educated trust-fund shits who have ruined this country and never earned a fucking thing honestly (Clinton, both Bushes, Bernanke, Paulson, Geithner, and the current waste of DNA in the white house), she actually had to work to pay her way through college. She had to go to college in places she could find work.
Fourth, please tell me why I should listen to Al Gore, who flunked out of divinity school and has no scientific background whatsoever, and who stands to become one of the richest men on earth from this scam.
Fifth, go fuck yourself in the ass with a hot piece of rebar, you talking-point-spewing shitstain.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 09, 2009 11:39 AM (IoUF1)
She's no Leftist Loon, though, and in the 21st Century that appears to say a LOT. But don't assume that means she's necessarily another Barry Goldwater.
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 09, 2009 12:31 PM (QECjC)
So Palin saying they are called illegal aliens for a reason and we need to close the border and crack down on illegals in this country is whishy washy?
what would you consider not whishy washy? rounding them all up and putting them in camps and using them for target practice?
Posted by: unseen at December 09, 2009 11:46 AM (aVGmX)
It is because they are NOT conservative and never have said they are. They are a mixed bag of people who are mostly liberal.
Posted by: Vic at December 09, 2009 11:49 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: SGT Dan at December 09, 2009 11:59 AM (GgXZc)
Posted by: SGT Dan at December 09, 2009 03:59 PM (GgXZc)
Not to mention that 205 is owned by saudi Arabia
Posted by: unseen at December 09, 2009 12:02 PM (aVGmX)
Gotta love it. For eight solid years the Democrats did absolutely nothing except snipe from the sidelines at Bush without any accountability.
Now Palin is outside the loop of political fallout if she ticks someone off, and she's out there on the mound just knocking them in the dirt again and again with high inside fastballs, and they are hating it. Karma can really suck, can't it , Dems?
Posted by: RM at December 09, 2009 12:11 PM (GkYyh)
Fifth, go fuck yourself in the ass with a hot piece of rebar, you talking-point-spewing shitstain.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 09, 2009 03:39 PM (IoUF1)
Don't hold back, how do you really feel? lol
Posted by: Brian72 at December 09, 2009 12:12 PM (f67UM)
Sarah's climate op-ed to scuttle
He's the expert don't we all know
Algore blows, Algore blows, Algore blows....
Posted by: TheresaD at December 09, 2009 12:29 PM (iGCmo)
Posted by: SGT Dan at December 09, 2009 12:39 PM (GgXZc)
Posted by: Luca Brasi at December 09, 2009 01:33 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at December 09, 2009 02:54 PM (WiOnI)
Posted by: Luca Brasi at December 09, 2009 05:33 PM (YmPwQ)
Palin's rebuttal to Gore's rebuttal:
Steven Hayward has a great article in The Weekly Standard on the Climategate scandal. Be sure to check it out.
The response to my op-ed by global warming alarmists has been interesting. Former Vice President Al Gore has called me a “denier” and informs us that climate change is “a principle in physics. It’s like gravity. It exists.”
Perhaps he’s right. Climate change is like gravity – a naturally occurring phenomenon that existed long before, and will exist long after, any governmental attempts to affect it.
However, he’s wrong in calling me a “denier.” As I noted in my op-ed above and in my original Facebook post on Climategate, I have never denied the existence of climate change. I just don’t think we can primarily blame man’s activities for the earth’s cyclical weather changes.
Former Vice President Gore also claimed today that the scientific community has worked on this issue for 20 years, and therefore it is settled science. Well, the Climategate scandal involves the leading experts in this field, and if Climategate is proof of the larger method used over the past 20 years, then Vice President Gore seriously needs to consider that their findings are flawed, falsified, or inconclusive.
Vice President Gore, the Climategate scandal exists. You might even say that itÂ’s sort of like gravity: you simply canÂ’t deny it.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 09, 2009 03:09 PM (IoUF1)
Posted by: lonestar at December 09, 2009 04:21 PM (+akm6)
Posted by: tomas at March 20, 2010 12:24 AM (J7cTI)
Posted by: Web hosting at July 11, 2010 11:58 AM (24fR8)
Posted by: Business Loan at March 22, 2011 11:32 PM (jiqNS)
There are a few boot selections available that offer a fall/winter option, including the Tambo. This good looking boot will take your winter wardrobe to a whole new level. It features all the same benefits as the aforementioned footwear, plus a full grain leather upper with a zippered shaft. A little pricey, being priced at $390. But who said style comes cheap?
The sandal series from MBT Shoes for Women is the last to highlight. You don't have to sweat it out this summer in a normal pair of walking shoes. MBT has a wide range of sandals that have all the same benefits as their shoes, plus the added benefit of keeping your feet arid and cool in those hot summer months. They have a nice variety of sandals including the Ema and the Habari.
Posted by: web design at March 22, 2011 11:34 PM (jiqNS)
Posted by: slimming coffee at June 23, 2011 05:00 PM (SFnqb)
Posted by: LILY at July 04, 2011 11:11 PM (WV02U)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3289 seconds, 316 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: maddogg at December 09, 2009 07:48 AM (OlN4e)