March 17, 2014
— Ace Not sure myself what the truth is here, but the man accused of falsely wearing a Ranger tab eventually takes it off. He doesn't seem to have many answers to the actual Ranger's questions.
The man (who is unidentified) was wearing the uniform on the campus San Joaquin Delta College. It's unclear why he was wearing the uniform; I don't see from this video that he was taking part in an anti-war protest or that sort of a thing.
He's confronted by a Ranger and another veteran who note that his uniform makes no sense (pointing out, for example, that the guy's 75th Rangers tab doesn't go with a 101st division tab:
“You do realize that the 101st is not a Ranger unit?” someone offscreen adds. “You do realize that the 101st is not an E.O.D. unit?”
I may have gotten the details of their argument wrong because I'm pretty clueless about military units and such.
Content warning for yelled expletiives.
Thanks to nevergiveup.
Posted by: Ace at
02:34 PM
| Comments (320)
Post contains 190 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Marcos the Kos at March 17, 2014 02:36 PM (DLu2s)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 17, 2014 02:39 PM (xSfiX)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 02:39 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 02:40 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: wheatie at March 17, 2014 02:40 PM (Xs26g)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 17, 2014 02:41 PM (xSegX)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 17, 2014 02:41 PM (xSfiX)
Posted by: Diogenes at March 17, 2014 02:41 PM (08Znv)
Posted by: tu3031 at March 17, 2014 02:41 PM (yv+63)
Posted by: wheatie at March 17, 2014 06:40 PM (Xs26g)
not the Army aparently
Posted by: The Obvious Sock at March 17, 2014 02:41 PM (q+zA9)
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 17, 2014 02:41 PM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Jason at March 17, 2014 02:41 PM (SDDV4)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at March 17, 2014 02:42 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 02:42 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: tu3031 at March 17, 2014 02:42 PM (yv+63)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 02:43 PM (SMP3h)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 02:44 PM (zOTsN)
C'mon...lighten up. Nothing a little ass whippin won't rectify.
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at March 17, 2014 02:44 PM (z+Xap)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at March 17, 2014 02:44 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 17, 2014 02:44 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Dobie Gillis at March 17, 2014 02:45 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 02:45 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at March 17, 2014 02:45 PM (pgQxn)
How come nobody fakes that they were in the Coast Guard?
It's like how no one with a "past life" was ever just an ordinary person.
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 17, 2014 02:45 PM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 02:45 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Campus Lefty Douchebag at March 17, 2014 02:45 PM (/AHDz)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 02:45 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 17, 2014 02:45 PM (xSfiX)
The only thing that would have made this worse is the arrival of campus police and them taking the phony's side and telling the outraged veterans to shut up.\\ wow. This pisses me off.
Posted by: Yip at March 17, 2014 02:45 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 02:45 PM (SMP3h)
Posted by: The Hobo Wears Prada (Seroquel Embiggins No Penis) at March 17, 2014 02:45 PM (GeVLX)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 17, 2014 02:46 PM (8ZskC)
There's so much fixin' to do in this Country, where to start?
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at March 17, 2014 02:46 PM (pgQxn)
Proper way? A severe fucking beating would be proper.
Posted by: lowandslow at March 17, 2014 02:46 PM (IV4od)
Posted by: grammie winger at March 17, 2014 02:46 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 17, 2014 02:46 PM (xSfiX)
Posted by: Campus Lefty Douchebag at March 17, 2014 02:47 PM (/AHDz)
its disgusting
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 06:44 PM (zOTsN)
Navy calls them EOD also. Not sure what the Army does
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 06:45 PM (nzKvP)
EOD for the Army, too (MOS 89D), but I've only seen them wear the EOD patch downrange, not in CONUS.
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 02:47 PM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 17, 2014 02:47 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 02:47 PM (SMP3h)
The last time I was in an 'Army Surplus' type store...there were bins of assorted patches for sale.
It's been years though, since I was there.
I hope they don't do that any more.
Posted by: wheatie at March 17, 2014 02:48 PM (Xs26g)
Posted by: John Kerry at March 17, 2014 06:43 PM (UAMVq)
Worse. He's a G-D disgrace. Worthless and weak (like you, ketchup boy). Now drop and give me twenty!
Posted by: Doug Neidermeyer at March 17, 2014 02:48 PM (BAS5M)
===============
It's all Tax to me!
Posted by: John Roberts at March 17, 2014 02:48 PM (/AHDz)
Posted by: no good deed at March 17, 2014 02:48 PM (vBhbc)
Posted by: Y-not at March 17, 2014 02:48 PM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 17, 2014 02:48 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: fluffy at March 17, 2014 02:48 PM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 02:49 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Kristophr at March 17, 2014 02:49 PM (c6N69)
There certainly is! I grew in the office too!
Posted by: Reggie Love at March 17, 2014 02:49 PM (pgQxn)
Posted by: Buckeye Abroad at March 17, 2014 02:49 PM (h6cl2)
Posted by: The Obvious Sock at March 17, 2014 02:49 PM (q+zA9)
Posted by: awkward davies at March 17, 2014 02:50 PM (whqez)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 17, 2014 02:50 PM (xSfiX)
The same guy ran a crooked drivers education company. His drivers weren't certified and when inspectors came around he told them to claim they were people they were not.
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at March 17, 2014 02:50 PM (P7Wsr)
Posted by: tu3031
Actually there has been some fakes - guys claiming that they were Aviation Survivalist a la Kevin Costner and bragging about their sea exploits and how many lives they saved.
Cheri = veteran Coastie
Posted by: Cheri at March 17, 2014 02:50 PM (VDGzf)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at March 17, 2014 02:50 PM (z+Xap)
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at March 17, 2014 02:50 PM (0IhFx)
Posted by: EC at March 17, 2014 02:50 PM (doBIb)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 06:49 PM (zOTsN)
Not a campus cop, but...run a search for "Gecko45" sometime.
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 02:50 PM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: no good deed at March 17, 2014 02:50 PM (vBhbc)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 17, 2014 02:50 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: Lauren at March 17, 2014 02:51 PM (hFL/3)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 02:51 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at March 17, 2014 02:51 PM (E8IHS)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at March 17, 2014 02:51 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: The Hobo Wears Prada (Seroquel Embiggins No Penis) at March 17, 2014 02:51 PM (GeVLX)
Posted by: fluffy at March 17, 2014 02:51 PM (Ua6T/)
===============
He better not!
Posted by: Prince at March 17, 2014 02:51 PM (/AHDz)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at March 17, 2014 02:51 PM (z+Xap)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 02:51 PM (zOTsN)
Vieira, who uploaded video of the confrontation to YouTube, was later arrested by campus authorities for confronting the man in military clothing. He was reportedly charged with disturbing the peace and making threats against the man.
“(Vieira) approached him on several occasions and verbally went after him,” Delta police officer Jim Bock told KXTV. “He’s been counseled on each occasion to stop. There are proper ways to handle these issues.”
According to authorities, the man in military clothing insists he served. Further, they told KXTV that it is not illegal to wear a uniform as long as the intent while doing so is not to obtain certain benefits.
Uniform boy is right. And Vierira seems like a ticking time bomb.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 17, 2014 02:51 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/b] [/s] at March 17, 2014 02:51 PM (HsTG8)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 02:52 PM (SMP3h)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 17, 2014 02:52 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at March 17, 2014 02:52 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 02:53 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: kathysaysso at March 17, 2014 02:53 PM (6H6o8)
Posted by: panzernashorn at March 17, 2014 02:54 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at March 17, 2014 02:54 PM (DL2i+)
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 17, 2014 06:51 PM (kdS6q)
I doubt that
Posted by: The Obvious Sock at March 17, 2014 02:54 PM (q+zA9)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 02:54 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 17, 2014 02:54 PM (xSfiX)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (tablet) at March 17, 2014 02:54 PM (a8eFL)
AF calls explosive ordinance guys EOD. I don't think Army does. I think this asshole got a uniform and some patches on Ebay and threw it together
its disgusting
The army refers to them as EOD. Most posts have a few hanging around. When I was stationed at Ft. Ord, we had to call on them to help us get rid of the Rusty Shotgun, that someone found while we were policing up after a field exercise.
Very long, and strange story, but I'm convinced that now, twenty years after the fact, there exists in some arms room, somewhere in the U.S., under lock and key, a padded envelope containing about 8 ounces of blown up rusty shotgun bits.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at March 17, 2014 02:55 PM (0IhFx)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 02:55 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: NCKate at March 17, 2014 02:55 PM (y7PFk)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 02:55 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 17, 2014 06:51 PM (kdS6q)
The whole point of wearing the uniform for guys like that is to get free shit or chicks...which pretty much amounts to "benefits." And I don't care how much he "insists he served" he needs to produce a DD214. And even if he did, he's in violation of Army regs by the manner in which he was wearing the uniform.
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 02:56 PM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 02:56 PM (0LHZx)
I honestly wasn't going to pretend to be anything, but it was good to know how it might look.
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at March 17, 2014 02:56 PM (P7Wsr)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at March 17, 2014 02:56 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 02:56 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 02:57 PM (SMP3h)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 17, 2014 02:57 PM (xSfiX)
Fireman? ok
Cop? not ok
lab tech? ok
vet in uniform? not ok
uniform with faked tabs/medals? not ok
Coast Guard Admiral? They have Admirals? OK!
Posted by: Yip at March 17, 2014 02:57 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Elinor at March 17, 2014 02:58 PM (95xxa)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 06:54 PM (0LHZx)
Oh, so you don't mind your tax dollars going to pay for unearned VA benefits for assholes who never served? You don't mind these people scamming charities and individuals based on fraudulent service?
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 02:58 PM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at March 17, 2014 02:58 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at March 17, 2014 02:58 PM (E8IHS)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 02:58 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: teej-who must be doing pretty much everything wrong at March 17, 2014 02:58 PM (QbKVX)
Posted by: Vic at March 17, 2014 06:42 PM (T2V/1)
They need to be ridiculed and lose their jobs, not thrown in jail.
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at March 17, 2014 06:51 PM (E8IHS)
The First Amendment gives you a right to bullshit. However if you attempt to obtain money or services based on your BS, that's fraud and will get you thrown in jail.
Posted by: Mætenloch at March 17, 2014 02:58 PM (pAlYe)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at March 17, 2014 02:59 PM (E8IHS)
This Ain't Hell has an entire Stolen Valor tournament every year, complete with brackets. They bust them all the time, often in conjunction with Shipley.
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 02:59 PM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: awkward davies at March 17, 2014 02:59 PM (whqez)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at March 17, 2014 02:59 PM (E8IHS)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 02:59 PM (nzKvP)
I know an awesome guy who has the worst Gulf War syndrome effects. He served in the mail room during the first gulf war. Poor guy has permanent visible tremors and is mentally incapacitated.
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at March 17, 2014 03:00 PM (P7Wsr)
Nooooooooooooooooo!!!!!
Posted by: Navycopjoe
Ok Squid-CopJoe......it's you and me outside in the internet parking lot at 1700 hours!
Posted by: Cheri at March 17, 2014 03:00 PM (VDGzf)
Posted by: Lauren at March 17, 2014 03:00 PM (hFL/3)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 17, 2014 03:00 PM (xSfiX)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 03:01 PM (nzKvP)
I was in...Sang Bang... Dang Gong... I was all over the place, a lot of places.
I was with the Green Berets, Special Unit Battalions... Commando Airborne Tactics... Specialist Tactics Unit Battalion.
Yeah, it was real hush hush.
I was Agent Orange, Special Agent Orange, that was me.
Posted by: Billy Ray Valentine at March 17, 2014 03:01 PM (Q6pxP)
Uniform boy is not right
Posted by: thunderb
Not illegal to wear military gear, else every Army Navy surplus store would be out of business. There are no sumptuary laws for general street wear unless you're trying to use a uniform in an official capacity,
It is illegal to state on a job application as such that you have veteran status if you didn't serve.
Uncool is not illegal.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 17, 2014 03:01 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: JHW at March 17, 2014 03:01 PM (a6SQ5)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 17, 2014 06:54 PM (xSfiX)
You're supposed to pull out your skinning knife and start slicing away at those hobos - what kind of lazy slacker are you?
Posted by: kathysaysso at March 17, 2014 03:01 PM (6H6o8)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 03:01 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: grammie winger at March 17, 2014 03:01 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 06:56 PM (0LHZx)
Redo those buttons! Dress that belt buckle! Straighten that cap! And goddamn it, tuck up those pajamas! Attention! Eyes front! What's that on your chest, mister?
Posted by: Doug Neidermeyer at March 17, 2014 03:01 PM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 03:02 PM (SMP3h)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 03:02 PM (nzKvP)
Well you got a point there, and could he be worse than the 2 broads from CA?
See, you get it.
Posted by: Unit 1B at March 17, 2014 03:02 PM (Cs2tJ)
Posted by: kathysaysso at March 17, 2014 03:03 PM (6H6o8)
101...The whole point of wearing the uniform for guys like that is to get free shit or chicks...which pretty much amounts to "benefits."
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 06:56 PM (r/e1Q)
--------
Wearing it for 'political optics' is also a "benefit"....propaganda benefit.
Like when liberals have some guy in fatigues with them, to give credence to what they're pushing.
Posted by: wheatie at March 17, 2014 03:03 PM (Xs26g)
That would be a nice way to spend a day....
Posted by: DishofRed at March 17, 2014 03:03 PM (Dmq63)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 03:03 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 07:02 PM (SMP3h)
True. And I wouldn't convict if some real vets gave the fake soldier a little physical discouragement.
Posted by: Mætenloch at March 17, 2014 03:04 PM (pAlYe)
I want your wife or girlfriend to be stopped by someone pretending to be law enforcement.
Posted by: Ugg Boots
Lord, if you can't seen the difference between the two situations...
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 17, 2014 03:04 PM (kdS6q)
A little young looking to be to be an E-8, and even more remarkable for an alleged E-8 Ranger, he is also a slick sleeve on the right.
Probably it is all cover for his real MOS of Space Shuttle Door Gunner.
Posted by: The Party of Science ! at March 17, 2014 03:04 PM (uN4Ye)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 03:04 PM (zOTsN)
IMO, wearing the uniform outside of performing a role (e.g. stage or screen) and in public while having never served is fraud.
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 03:04 PM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 03:04 PM (SMP3h)
Posted by: tasker at March 17, 2014 03:04 PM (RJMhd)
Flashback. Late Eighties. Foggy night in San Francisco.
Young guy is panhandling on the corner. Has a sign. "VIETNAM VETERAN." And a ratty old green fatigue jacket.
Roll on up. "Wow, man, you were in The Nam? Wild."
Guy spins me a spiel about how deep in the shit he had been.
"So how old are you?"
He blurts out "22" and then realizes he just stepped on his dick.
"So you were at Khe Sanh while you were just out of diapers. You ARE a a total bad-ass motherfucker! Hey, tell you what. Back down the block where I was drinking? There are some guys at the bar who are for-real Vietnam vets. Why don't you just wait right here while I go get them."
You've never seen someone evaporate so fast.
Posted by: torquewrench at March 17, 2014 03:05 PM (gqT4g)
He seems to be attempting to lend authority to a protest by claiming to be military. Does that reach the level of fraud yet? And if he's trying to use that authority to get donations or signatures, is that fraud?
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at March 17, 2014 03:05 PM (P7Wsr)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 03:06 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 17, 2014 03:06 PM (TE35l)
Cough.
Posted by: John Kerry at March 17, 2014 03:06 PM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 03:06 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 17, 2014 03:06 PM (xSfiX)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 03:06 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: soothsayer at March 17, 2014 03:07 PM (xSfiX)
Who is the injured party?
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 07:06 PM (0LHZx)
I am, and veteran that ever served is. But that's something you'll never understand.
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 03:07 PM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 03:08 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 03:08 PM (0LHZx)
That being said, I admire all of the services and their members. It is not an easy life for sure.
Posted by: Cheri at March 17, 2014 03:08 PM (VDGzf)
It may just come down to something that those that don't feel like that about serving, or the the flag, or the Constitution just don't get. They don't have a higher honor to uphold and can't comprehend caring so much. And so, that makes those of us that do care, the wacko birds. Ok, got it.
Posted by: Yip at March 17, 2014 03:08 PM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 06:58 PM (0LHZx)
I have to give you credit...you are consistently stupid.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (anti-Irish Bigot) at March 17, 2014 03:08 PM (QFxY5)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 17, 2014 03:08 PM (Dam1Z)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 03:08 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: awkward davies at March 17, 2014 03:08 PM (whqez)
Posted by: YTown Guy at March 17, 2014 03:08 PM (das+y)
Are you sure he was just "walking down the street"? It seems that he was part of a protest, which is not the same thing.
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at March 17, 2014 03:08 PM (P7Wsr)
Posted by: Louise Belcher at March 17, 2014 03:09 PM (hFL/3)
I wanna lead a life of danger!
Before the day I die, there's five things I wanna ride !
Bicycle, tricycle, automobile, Virgin Mother, and a ferris wheel!
Posted by: John Bender runs down the hallway at March 17, 2014 03:09 PM (gSPiG)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 03:09 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at March 17, 2014 03:09 PM (E8IHS)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 03:09 PM (aYJgz)
155
You know what pisses me off (besides that pic on the sidebar)?
You mean the Monkey Orchid, sooth?
Heh.
That thing is freaky looking.
So are the other ones, if you click on it.
Posted by: wheatie at March 17, 2014 03:10 PM (Xs26g)
Who is the injured party?
Everyone who sacrificed and strained to earn the right to wear that uniform.. It cheapens their efforts, their honor, if any asshole can wear it (or some stupid facsimile thereof) as a fashion statement assembled from various parts bins.
So exactly where are you on the Autism Spectrum anyhow?
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 17, 2014 03:10 PM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Proof Positive at March 17, 2014 03:10 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 03:10 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 07:08 PM (0LHZx)
Where did I ever say that? I'm merely defending the actual Ranger that called the guy out...which, incidentally, is in keeping with the SCOTUS decision, in which the remedy was determined to be actual veterans calling out and humiliating the fakers.
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 03:10 PM (r/e1Q)
Oh you sailors are all alike!
Posted by: Cheri at March 17, 2014 03:10 PM (VDGzf)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 07:09 PM (0LHZx)
well, you for starters.
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 17, 2014 03:11 PM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 03:11 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Adam at March 17, 2014 03:11 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: grammie winger at March 17, 2014 03:11 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: Elinor at March 17, 2014 03:11 PM (95xxa)
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at March 17, 2014 03:11 PM (1xUj/)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at March 17, 2014 03:11 PM (l3vZN)
Posted by: Buckeye Abroad at March 17, 2014 03:11 PM (h6cl2)
please show me where I said it was illegal
I said it was not right and disgusting
its not
Posted by: thunderb
"Uniform boy is not right"
Which I took to mean you disagreed with his statement that his wearing a uniform was not illegal.
So, are we all agreed that, outside of using a uniform in some official capacity, wearing one is not illegal?
Now as to the other "right", wearing military style gear? Wearing army surplus kit? Wearing that kit with various military patches and what have you?
Draw the line where you will.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 17, 2014 03:12 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: JHW at March 17, 2014 03:12 PM (a6SQ5)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 07:09 PM (0LHZx)
Have you noticed the tone here?
These are people who are protecting something that is important to them.
Maybe you should learn something about just what it is they are defending before you shoot your mouth off.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (anti-Irish Bigot) at March 17, 2014 03:13 PM (QFxY5)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 03:13 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 03:13 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 03:13 PM (DXfAK)
I know a lot of guys and girls do this, but honestly, how is this not taking by fraud? Con-men lie to themselves and say they're not robbing anyone. Their victims hand them the money. Sex has value too. If someone who looks like Zac Efron gets some dippy girl to hand over her virginity, what's the difference really?
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at March 17, 2014 03:14 PM (P7Wsr)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 17, 2014 03:14 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 03:15 PM (0LHZx)
As many faults as the VA system has, homeless vets are a top priority but you can't help someone and force a lifestyle on them that they don't want.
Posted by: Cheri at March 17, 2014 03:15 PM (VDGzf)
Now as to the other "right", wearing military style gear? Wearing army surplus kit? Wearing that kit with various military patches and what have you?
Draw the line where you will.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 17, 2014 07:12 PM (kdS6q)
http://tinyurl.com/psfalyo
http://tinyurl.com/q28xnkd
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 03:15 PM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 03:16 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: ManWithNoParty at March 17, 2014 03:16 PM (ojnk6)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 07:15 PM (0LHZx)
So you have a lot in common, then...
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 03:16 PM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: awkward davies at March 17, 2014 03:16 PM (whqez)
174 Like when liberals have some guy in fatigues with them, to give credence to what they're pushing.
Posted by: wheatie at March 17, 2014 07:03 PM (Xs26g)
That's really stretching it though. If there were literally no benefits to impersonating an officer no one would do it.
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at March 17, 2014 07:09 PM (E8IHS)
---------
Stretching it?
Not really.
I mean, think about it...
Using fake 'military guys' to push a political agenda affects more than one or two people who are being victimized in some fraud.
It affects crowds of people.
And if it's on a video...and replayed thousands of times...then the propaganda spreads out like a virus.
Posted by: wheatie at March 17, 2014 03:17 PM (Xs26g)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 03:17 PM (pR5YY)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 03:17 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 03:17 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 03:18 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 03:18 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 03:18 PM (0LHZx)
166This fucking fake isn't wearing an EOD skill badge over his U.S. ARMY tape.
Though one would expect this phoney to be badged to the max as is typical of the ilk, not wearing any, alas, doesn't prove anything as wearing them is not required. In the olden days it was the fashion to wear every badge one earned, then when the ACUs came out, as the pin-ons are such a pain in the ass, it became cooler to wear none, but now that sew-ons have been authorized, the pendulum has swung again.
I still marvel that none of these bozos - especially the ones who were i the military - never look up the regs to get their uniforms straight. There was a drug runner who did, had a totally squared-away uniform, and upon entering the country was only stopped because the whole 23 year old or so LTC thing didn't add up.
Posted by: The Party of Science ! at March 17, 2014 03:19 PM (uN4Ye)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at March 17, 2014 03:19 PM (l3vZN)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 03:20 PM (FxIhI)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 03:20 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 17, 2014 03:20 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 03:20 PM (0LHZx)
There was a law actually. Stolen Valor. John Roberts helped strike it down.
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at March 17, 2014 03:21 PM (P7Wsr)
Posted by: Diogenes at March 17, 2014 03:21 PM (08Znv)
But he was proud of his service, and would constantly remind us of the Coast Guard motto, "Semper Scrotum: Always on the Ball".
Posted by: tu3031 at March 17, 2014 03:21 PM (yv+63)
Posted by: Buzzion at March 17, 2014 03:21 PM (awJIh)
http://tinyurl.com/psfalyo
http://tinyurl.com/q28xnkd
Posted by: Country Singer
Title 10 of the United States Code outlines the role of armed forces in the United States Code.
It provides the legal basis for the roles, missions and organization of each of the services as well as the United States Department of Defense. Each of the five subtitles deals with a separate aspect or component of the armed services
The cite covers people in the military, not civilians.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 17, 2014 03:21 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 17, 2014 03:21 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at March 17, 2014 03:22 PM (QBm1P)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 03:22 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Moo at March 17, 2014 03:22 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: grammie winger at March 17, 2014 03:22 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: --- at March 17, 2014 03:23 PM (Ud9qG)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 03:23 PM (FxIhI)
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 17, 2014 07:21 PM (kdS6q)
Oh? It seems to me that persons not a member, i.e. civilians, is applicable here.
"Except as otherwise provided by law, no person except a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps, as the case may be, may wear— (1) the uniform, or a distinctive part of the uniform, of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps; or (2) a uniform any part of which is similar to a distinctive part of the uniform of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps."
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 03:23 PM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: ManWithNoParty at March 17, 2014 03:23 PM (ojnk6)
Posted by: Samuel L. Jackson at March 17, 2014 03:26 PM (BAS5M)
Posted by: awkward davies at March 17, 2014 03:27 PM (whqez)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 03:27 PM (FxIhI)
1. The fallacy of the excluded middle.
2. Deliberate obtuseness.
3. Building straw men.
4. Red Herrings.
5. Argument by dismissal.
It's almost as though they have no actual facts to defend any of their ideals, or something.
Posted by: Tacky Adhesive at March 17, 2014 03:27 PM (+3Jmb)
Oh? It seems to me that persons not a member, i.e. civilians, is applicable here.
Posted by: Country Singer
You would be misreading that. It's taking the text out of context, like pointing to a section of a flood insurance bill and saving it applies to auto mpg.
Totally different set of laws.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 17, 2014 03:28 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Buckeye Abroad at March 17, 2014 03:28 PM (h6cl2)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 17, 2014 03:28 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: JHW at March 17, 2014 03:29 PM (a6SQ5)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 03:30 PM (FxIhI)
How am I taking it out of context? The statute covers "Unauthorized Wearing Prohibited."
Posted by: Country Singer at March 17, 2014 03:30 PM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: grammie winger at March 17, 2014 03:30 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: Raykon, hand-to-gland-combat specialist, 101st Arctic EOD Battalion at March 17, 2014 03:31 PM (KSjsb)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 03:31 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: IrishEd at March 17, 2014 03:31 PM (bfm04)
Posted by: Elinor at March 17, 2014 03:32 PM (95xxa)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 17, 2014 03:33 PM (FxIhI)
Posted by: Buckeye Abroad at March 17, 2014 03:39 PM (h6cl2)
Posted by: justAjoe at March 17, 2014 03:40 PM (SYRuV)
Posted by: JHW at March 17, 2014 03:41 PM (a6SQ5)
How am I taking it out of context? The statute covers "Unauthorized Wearing Prohibited."
Posted by: Country Singer
Because you are taking something out of context from the wrong set of laws. That section doesn't cover what you are demanding it does.
However, if you are that certain about your legal standing, might one suggest you catch the next Greyhound out to San Joaquin Delta College, track down the miscreant, perform a citizen's arrest, and contact the nearest FBI office, since you are insisting he's committing a Federal crime.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 17, 2014 03:44 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: EC at March 17, 2014 03:44 PM (doBIb)
Posted by: EC at March 17, 2014 03:47 PM (doBIb)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 03:50 PM (zOTsN)
"262the hands in pocket are a dead giveaway
Please explain?"
Air Force Gloves, as they are known in the Army...
Posted by: The Party of Science ! at March 17, 2014 03:54 PM (uN4Ye)
Posted by: John Thompson at March 17, 2014 03:57 PM (Ni+Ei)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 04:01 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: EC at March 17, 2014 04:02 PM (doBIb)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 04:04 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 04:05 PM (zOTsN)
Not served. Just observation. In uniform, hands in pocket would appear sloppy, casual, undisciplined, and lack of readiness. IMO
Posted by: NCwoof at March 17, 2014 04:06 PM (aUQgu)
Posted by: EC at March 17, 2014 04:08 PM (doBIb)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 04:09 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 04:12 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: EC at March 17, 2014 04:12 PM (doBIb)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 04:16 PM (zOTsN)
A military force is effective because it is disciplined. Doubt you will hear complaints about cold hands in the Rangers, USMC, Delta Force, SEALs, and so on.
Posted by: NCwoof at March 17, 2014 04:18 PM (aUQgu)
1. Those who served (and their friends and families) who think this POS needs his ass kicked.
2. Those who never served and think it's "no big deal".
Posted by: Icedog at March 17, 2014 04:20 PM (uZ6Ul)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 17, 2014 04:22 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 17, 2014 04:25 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: Elinor at March 17, 2014 04:26 PM (95xxa)
Never disagree with you. Am merely a military family member cheering our guys on.
PS Don't know if I could settle on Grant, being a daughter of the Confederacy. But no real argument on your point.
Posted by: NCwoof at March 17, 2014 04:30 PM (aUQgu)
Posted by: Elinor at March 17, 2014 04:34 PM (95xxa)
"Why is someone who will later be arrested for aiding al-Qaida hanging around to comment about a "fake" soldier?"
It is even better that he blathered about the guy being a phony and mentioned basic & Drill Sergeant in his face & so on, but never made it to basic himself - he too is a fraud, albeit a fraud with some apparent issues in the cranium.
Posted by: The Party of Science ! at March 17, 2014 04:35 PM (uN4Ye)
The fake Ranger is a douche. So was Viera for threatening him. Ridicule the imposter. Make sure everyone around knows that he's a lying, pathetic piece of poo. But having a tab, a scroll or even an MOH doesn't justify assaulting someone just because they're a douchebag. That doesn't honor dead friends. Instead, it discredits their service because you're their representative and now you've acted like a jackass.
"I will always endeavor to uphold the prestige, honor, and high esprit de corps of the Rangers." Bowing up to a fatbody with mental problems doesn't achieve this.
Posted by: RLTW at March 17, 2014 04:38 PM (VdfCT)
Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at March 17, 2014 04:39 PM (dvRYt)
Posted by: Scott Odegard at March 17, 2014 04:39 PM (8rnGM)
Posted by: Synova at March 17, 2014 04:42 PM (7/PU+)
Posted by: freedomcosts at March 17, 2014 04:44 PM (qJka5)
Unless the guy was using the uniform to perpetrate some kind of fraud or misleading others into thinking he could speak authoritatively about the military, I don't see how it's any one's business what someone wears.
These guys have no right to tell someone else they can't wear whatever they want to wear. This is still a free country.
Just like people can burn the flag if they wish.
This is just harassment because they can. Bullies.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Awaiting Armageddon) at March 17, 2014 04:46 PM (LSDdO)
Posted by: Nylon66 at March 17, 2014 04:46 PM (YELrK)
And arrogant douches who think they can judge others merely by an opinion they have that disagrees with theirs.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Awaiting Armageddon) at March 17, 2014 04:49 PM (LSDdO)
Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at March 17, 2014 04:51 PM (dvRYt)
And you would be wrong.
We're supposed to be a nation of laws and not of men deciding to take the law into their own hands.
There are other means to make sure that this person does not benefit from his actions.
Otherwise we're just as bad as any other tribe of savages.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Awaiting Armageddon) at March 17, 2014 04:52 PM (LSDdO)
Posted by: oejay44cday at March 17, 2014 04:54 PM (LEEQ+)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 04:57 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 04:58 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Synova at March 17, 2014 04:58 PM (7/PU+)
Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at March 17, 2014 05:00 PM (dvRYt)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 05:03 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: chad at March 17, 2014 05:05 PM (gYowz)
Appreciate your expression of the seemingly lost idea of "honor", and what it means to be "honorable".
A "dishonorable discharge" must mean something about the character of the individual being sent out from the service.
Posted by: NCwoof at March 17, 2014 05:08 PM (aUQgu)
Posted by: Mary Cloggenstein from Brattleboro, Vermont at March 17, 2014 05:21 PM (SK5U6)
Posted by: Lasue at March 17, 2014 06:09 PM (gjIQF)
Posted by: thunderb at March 17, 2014 06:11 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Jazzizhep at March 17, 2014 06:44 PM (yolS9)
@282 Two groups of posters in this thread:
1. Those who served (and their friends and families) who think this POS needs his ass kicked.
2. Those who never served and think it's "no big deal".
There's a third group - those who don't have any connection to the military except their appreciation for their service.
I don't know if this guy should get a severe hiding or not. But he should be ridiculed. I like the previous poster's idea of following this guy around all day with a sign saying "fake soldier". And then post his personal info.
Posted by: RightWingProf at March 17, 2014 07:03 PM (RtR5I)
Posted by: Erowmero at March 17, 2014 07:14 PM (1gcFZ)
I wore military surplus khaki pants because I liked them. I guess they should have thrown me in jail.
Posted by: Craig at March 17, 2014 08:39 PM (NIN1w)
Posted by: Mr. Feverhead at March 17, 2014 08:48 PM (6ahup)
Posted by: chad at March 17, 2014 10:07 PM (gYowz)
Posted by: Stephanie at March 18, 2014 01:33 AM (sF0CB)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 18, 2014 02:34 AM (euj9t)
Dude, please... This country for the past 14 years has *fetishized* anyone who serves in the military or is a first-responder. It is creepy and weird and really unhealthy for a republic to worship people who wear a uniform and bear arms.
It is fascism-lite. Soon to be followed by full-bore fascism.
Posted by: Craig at March 18, 2014 02:47 AM (NIN1w)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 18, 2014 06:02 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: The LT at March 18, 2014 07:29 AM (GwLJQ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4857 seconds, 448 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








I wish people would confront our fake president the same way. :/
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at March 17, 2014 02:36 PM (0IhFx)