December 13, 2009
— Gabriel Malor Before yesterday the Approval Index had never been below -15. Yesterday it dropped to -16. Today he's at -19.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows that 23% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-two percent (42%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -19.[...]
The 23% who Strongly Approve matches the lowest level of enthusiasm yet recorded. Just 41% of Democrats Strongly Approve while 69% of Republicans Strongly Disapprove. Among voters not affiliated with either major party, 21% Strongly Approve and 49% Strongly Disapprove.
[...]
Among those who consider fiscal policy issues the most important, just 1% Strongly Approve and 81% Strongly Disapprove.
The PresidentÂ’s Approval Index rating is -2 among voters under 30 and -29 among senior citizens. From an income perspective, the PresidentÂ’s ratings are weakest among those who earn $40,000 to $100,000 annually.
I'm trying to figure out what happened in the last four days to turn off so many more people. The major nets have had all Tiger all the time. The only thing I can think of is the vague connection folks have between the President and the imminent unpopular climate change talks in Copenhagen.
Is it a delayed reaction to the Afghanistan speech?
Is it just Obama fatigue?

Again, it's Slu's. Thanks to commenter YIKES!
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
08:56 AM
| Comments (152)
Post contains 241 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Sekhmet at December 13, 2009 09:04 AM (t7fcE)
Posted by: Alex at December 13, 2009 09:05 AM (sAP8F)
Posted by: Key West at December 13, 2009 09:06 AM (qnurC)
Posted by: eman at December 13, 2009 09:07 AM (IERSf)
Posted by: Sekhmet at December 13, 2009 09:07 AM (t7fcE)
Maybe it's just my imagination, but there seems to be a weird pattern going on with Gallup.
Poll numbers don't seem to move for two to three days at a time and he's being kept a 50% come hell or high water.
Posted by: YIKES! at December 13, 2009 09:09 AM (/cfp9)
The back bumpers of the cars parked in the lot of my northeastern, state-funded liberal arts and teaching college are sporting more and more dirty, sticky rectangles where Obama bumper stickers used to be.
Actually criticizing Obama is still grounds for expulsion/losing tenure, but people are saying a lot with their dirty bumper rectangles.
Posted by: Truman North at December 13, 2009 09:10 AM (XH/G8)
Posted by: pep at December 13, 2009 09:11 AM (DZyVK)
It's the magazine covers and the silly interviews with the ugly wife. People are getting sick the Obamas and their bullshit.
At this rate, Obama will be below 45% approval by the end of his 1st year. And if unemployment goes back up, which it will, he's done.
Posted by: the professor at December 13, 2009 09:11 AM (z37MR)
From an income perspective, the PresidentÂ’s ratings are weakest among those who earn $40,000 to $100,000 annually. money.
FIFY
Posted by: Truman North at December 13, 2009 09:11 AM (XH/G8)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at December 13, 2009 09:12 AM (DPM1U)
Posted by: eman at December 13, 2009 09:12 AM (IERSf)
That's not an inverted hockey stick, it's a puck to the balls.
Posted by: andycanuck at December 13, 2009 09:13 AM (2qU2d)
Posted by: naturalfake at December 13, 2009 09:13 AM (HylJ6)
Posted by: eddiebear at December 13, 2009 09:13 AM (1Bzzr)
And if unemployment goes back up, which it will, he's done.
ACORN. SEIU. Amnesty. Union and Black Panther thuggery. The Media. Stimulus creating phony jobs.
He's not done. And if he is electorally done, don't put it past him to just rig the bitch like his heroes Chavez et al.
Posted by: Truman North at December 13, 2009 09:13 AM (XH/G8)
They can also see their families, friends and neighbors out of work...or hoping that they don't lose their jobs, look at how the value of their houses and 401k's have gone down, and see local stores and businesses closing. The talking heads can try and spin it all they want, but it only works to a point.
The only thing I can compare it to is when I was in the former Soviet Union in 1988-1989. Lotsa happy talk in the media, different story on the streets, and people were getting pissed off and losing their fear. A "charismatic" leader with good media skills can only do so much. Eventually they gotta deliver. Gorby didn't, and I doubt Oblahblah's up for the task, either.
Next year should be very interesting, especially around election time. Pass the popcorn and the Valu-Rite, there will probably be quite a show come November....
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at December 13, 2009 09:16 AM (KWhJd)
Posted by: eman at December 13, 2009 09:16 AM (IERSf)
I think that Obama is at the stage where anything he does -- the Copenhagen speech, the upcoming 60 Minutes interview, the Oprah appearance -- is just going to piss people off.
Ultimately, Obama isn't a likable person. He's distant, arrogant and humorless. So, if you don't like what he's doing and you've gotten over the whole historical thing, what do you have left?
Not a lot of hope, that's what.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 13, 2009 09:16 AM (ItSLQ)
He's falling because it's Christmas. People don't have the money to shop. The malls aren't crowded. The is insecurity about whether to spend money or not. It makes people cranky. Obama also announced that there would be very little "christmas" at the white house.
When The New York Times indirectly revealed on Sunday that President Obama and his family were planning a "non-religious Christmas" sans Nativity scene, critical reaction was swift.
They backed off and put in a Nativity scene later.
He's also pissing people off when they can't buy presents with trying to screw them on climate regulations.
Posted by: dagny at December 13, 2009 09:16 AM (wM6F3)
It is EVERYTHING! Not one thing he is doing has popular support. NOT ONE FREAKING THING!
He can't get by anymore on hope and change and big smiles and putting his nose up in the air. Now he actually has to GOVERN and work with people and make deals and understand the issues. FAIL.
Posted by: Dan at December 13, 2009 09:18 AM (KZraB)
Why do you think Obama told the Republicans to keep their mouths shut?
He knows he's losing support like a sieve because details of his real agenda are being revealed.
Posted by: the professor at December 13, 2009 09:18 AM (z37MR)
To me it seems very obvious, but with limited upside for getting psyched about it.
The Right is roughly where it's always been with Obama - 42 percent-ish strongly disapprove. We pick up a point or two a month; the trend has been favorable but not hyperbolically increasing. Our distate for Obama has hardened (from 'somewhat' to 'strongly') but there's only so many total people to work with.
The Left is shifting from "strongly approve" to "kinda approve". A LOT of that is the Afghanistan speech. Some more of it may be the Nobel speech and finding out that he's prepared to faking being a liberal internationalist instead of an anti-war socialist. Another piece of it is his lame work on health care and climatehoax. That shift from strongly approve to somewhat is enough right there to take it from -10 to -19.
The reason we shouldn't all dance on the rooftops about it is because he is only one Big Win away from the Left remembering why they were so excited about him. If health care reform goes thru, a lot of them will be stoked again.
This is what makes the passion index so useless, despite it being fun.
Posted by: mmmmmmmega at December 13, 2009 09:18 AM (RBLFK)
Posted by: naturalfake at December 13, 2009 09:19 AM (HylJ6)
Posted by: eman at December 13, 2009 09:20 AM (IERSf)
Posted by: dagny at December 13, 2009 09:20 AM (wM6F3)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at December 13, 2009 09:21 AM (DPM1U)
"I don't care if he's a murderer, I don't care if he kills some cops, he has told me he is saved, so I just want to let him free!"
Posted by: Linda Gottfredson's Apprentice at December 13, 2009 09:21 AM (7twCU)
First Q: Who is the most outstanding male political figure?
Seems like an awfully narrow question. Did they accept Michelle Obama?
Posted by: Truman North at December 13, 2009 09:24 AM (XH/G8)
TruNorth, you're right to worry about Obama becoming Chavezesque.
The more unpopular he becomes the more he attacks his critics and tries to silence them. Very unpresidential, and very unAmerican. So the lower Obama goes in the polls the worse he makes himself look. But as he sinks lower in the polls he becomes more like a dictator.
It will be interesting to see how things unfold. Can we outlast Obama before Obama turns into a nybrid of Putin and Chavez? I dunno. It's gonna be close.
Posted by: the professor at December 13, 2009 09:25 AM (z37MR)
Asked about the President's latest approval rating, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs inserted his fingers in his ears and stated "Num num num I can't hear you num num num..."
Posted by: Crusty at December 13, 2009 09:25 AM (qzgbP)
Posted by: dagny at December 13, 2009 09:26 AM (wM6F3)
Posted by: Never Mind at December 13, 2009 09:28 AM (eMePu)
Posted by: dagny at December 13, 2009 09:29 AM (wM6F3)
Posted by: INCITEmarsh at December 13, 2009 09:30 AM (f3AuC)
mmmmega's point makes sense to me (we saw the same thing happen to Bush a lot with his base, tipping from strong approval to moderate approval) - Obama is taking a hit with his base over Afghanistan, inability to push forward his agenda (easily I mean, i.e. the way his base wants it, which is to run roughshod over the rest of us).
They don't just want him to "win", they want him to kick our ass while doing it.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at December 13, 2009 09:33 AM (Wh0W+)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 13, 2009 09:34 AM (SLMWU)
And the EPA ruling to take command and control over all industry via CO2 regulation, had to cause more intense alarm.
Perhaps a lot of people just catch up on this crap over the weekend, especially the likely voter types, who are also more likely to be employed.
Posted by: bill at December 13, 2009 09:38 AM (4RG6F)
Posted by: Blindgoose at December 13, 2009 09:40 AM (hZOQ8)
Posted by: Blindgoose at December 13, 2009 09:42 AM (hZOQ8)
When you prosecute Americans for slapping around terrorists and 'torture' and promise to close a perfectly good prison for no good reason, people are gonna start to get annoyed.
Wait'll the trial begins in NYC.
Posted by: the professor at December 13, 2009 09:43 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 13, 2009 01:34 PM (SLMWU)
yes, I have to add to that.
I did not like Bush then, and even attended protests agn him and Cheney (who now I have tremendous respect for doing whatever was necessary to keep America safe and strong.)
what you are also observing is that recent ex-democrats like me are realising that the lunatic radical america-hating lefties are NOT what we signed up for (we were groups in the "anti-Bush" camp with these vile America-hating lunatics). I was a democrat mainly b/c I am pro-choice. But I am pretty much for America ideas, ya know, strong military, adherance to US constitution, indiv rights, etc.
what many independents and centerists democrats are realising is that Bush was not that bad, and that there is really a far lefty radical america-hating, miltiary-hating bunch of people in this country (probably all in Pelosi's district). And this reality is hitting people now. Which is why people are backlashing. THere is now alternative media, the internet, they can read/watch and make up their own minds, and many like me are realising how much the MSM have been lying to us, makes me wonder what else and how long they have been lying ?
Next you will see people who like protested agn Bush/Cheney say and realise that heck, Bush wasn't that bad, at least he didnt go ahead loathing America and wanting to put us in jail b/c we don't want death-care.
Obama never really had a "base", he just was riding the wave of "anti-Bush" and "anti-Hillary" (I say this as a Hillary supporter). He never had any mandate, he was never for anything, just against, mainly against America and American ideals and freedoms.
just my 2 cents-- a recovering democrat.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 09:44 AM (ACkhT)
Robert Gibbs clarified the meaning of the -19 approval rating, stating that what Rasmussen meant to say was that every man, woman and beast on Earth adores Obama with all their soul. University of East Anglia later adjusted the -19 poll number to +infinity.
Posted by: Crusty at December 13, 2009 09:45 AM (qzgbP)
Posted by: eman at December 13, 2009 09:46 AM (IERSf)
Me too. The ones I do spot, get a double key pass on both sides. Fuckers.
Posted by: Barbarian at December 13, 2009 09:48 AM (EL+OC)
yes, I agree with the commentor above, also people are realising that lies about Climategate, and now the EPA is going to act like a dictator, and we are giving contitutional rights to terrorists who want to hurt the citizens of that country they are trying to destroy.
And then the death-care, serisouly, jailing people for not buying the crap they want to force us to? People are more and more reading the founding of this country and the US contitution, and realising the people in charge are blatantly not only listening or doing what the people that put them there want
This woudl be great time for a movie like "The Patriot" to come out. It woudl be hit, even in these economic times.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 09:49 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 13, 2009 09:52 AM (SLMWU)
It just seems to me that the error in the passion index is in overemphasizing the gentle nomadic movements between strongly approving and somewhat approving, at the expense of measuring what really matters: people who move from somewhat approving to somewhat disapproving. To do the latter, people have to make up their minds that they were wrong in the first place, that their overall take on the guy was wrong on some level, making that change somewhat sticky and meaningful.
Going from strongly approving to somewhat approving, which is what the Passion Index ends up over-emphasizing, is really just the ebb and flow of popular sentiment as it tags along with the daily news cycle.
Posted by: mmmmmmmega at December 13, 2009 09:52 AM (b3p9U)
Are the Obamabots still using the 'jobs created/saved' line?
The stories about the saved/created jobs really hurt Obama on the economy, I think.
Posted by: the professor at December 13, 2009 09:54 AM (z37MR)
O/T
Just reloaded the Palin vs. Shatner thread and noticed that the video is now labelled for "Mature Audiences" only, and requires you to sign in to see it. Anyone else see this?
Posted by: Have Blue at December 13, 2009 09:56 AM (mV+es)
At least the recession is over, according to Larry Summers.
Now we're just totally bankrupt, but recession-free.
Posted by: TexasJew at December 13, 2009 09:58 AM (3xtcs)
"At least the recession is over, according to Larry Summers."
Yes, but now the Depression has started.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 09:59 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 13, 2009 10:02 AM (SLMWU)
Lets not get ahead of ourselves. While I'm doing a little happy dance in response to these numbers, there are still lots of things that could happen to turn this around to postive numbers for Obambi. If the economy/unemployment does get better, and people like Larry Kudrow believe it's going to get better sooner than later, that is going to benefit The Won and Dems. Now I want the economy/employment to improve, just don't want it to benefit the Dems., and we all know that they will spin any positive news as a result of their policies (which we all know is not true, but the majority of the electorate are feaking idiots). However, if the EPA does it's command and control bit and Healthcare passes, then things will only get worse for the Dems. But then we are all fooked if that happens.
Posted by: Opus at December 13, 2009 10:08 AM (IebeI)
Posted by: barbaraS at December 13, 2009 10:08 AM (gZn89)
"people like Larry Kudrow believe it's going to get better sooner than later"
Hate to break it to you, Larry Kudlow since Jan '09 keeps going on and on about mustard seeds, he actually thins America is in a new Bull cycle.
THere is a reason CNBS has lost 65% viewership this year.
zerohedge.com has a wonderful post about this. Wouldn't be surprised if zerohedge's audience is greater than CNBS's
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 10:11 AM (ACkhT)
A smart president would avoid Copenhagen is light of the new evidence and put things off.
Your point being?
Posted by: sherlock at December 13, 2009 10:12 AM (ktKOD)
You're welcome, America.
We will get the last laugh.
Posted by: Glenn Beck, Andrew Breitbart at December 13, 2009 10:13 AM (50S+L)
Is it a delayed reaction to the Afghanistan speech?
Is it just Obama fatigue?
Obama ran as a moderate to conservative Democrat. He has governed as a far left extremist. The moderates he won over don't want to pay much attention to politics outside of the very end of the election cycle, but he is forcing them to with his economic incompetence and his grasping policies.
And they are angry about both. The best thing Obama could do right now is put his remaining policies on hold, stop giving prime time speeches, and maybe go play kissy face with the Europeans.
Though it is an interesting question, if Obama did layoff the National Socialism for a bit, would the voters forgive him? I'm guessing not unless unemployment drops below 8%.
Posted by: 18-1 at December 13, 2009 10:14 AM (bgcml)
So, I guess all those obscenely overpaid gubmint lackeys are still in his camp.
Posted by: Peaches at December 13, 2009 10:14 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at December 13, 2009 10:17 AM (xqhoO)
Posted by: stuiec at December 13, 2009 10:17 AM (Ate22)
It was the Oslo speech. The fact that all the elites were raving about it should have been a tip off. I think it has to do with the fact that people are seeing that Obama will say anything do anything to hold onto power. If he would abandon his core principles of appeesement and argue for "just wars" whatelse will he not throw under the bus. Most of the new numbers IMO is from liberals abandonment. Is is getting down to his base and he is throwing his base away like Bush did to try to win the middle back. It will not work.
Posted by: unseen at December 13, 2009 10:19 AM (mQauu)
Wanna bet, No More Golf Photo Ops of half-black Jughead on the links for a while?
Posted by: Armchair Psychiatrist at December 13, 2009 10:19 AM (EL+OC)
The fun part (kinda) is watching and waiting for Reid to pass his so called "health care reform" bill. You know -the bill that nobody wants, the bill what will raise costs. (unless the CBO can figure out how to massage the numbers and lie about it.) The democrats want to stand in unison for Obama, but they know it's risky.
It's amazing what the democrats will do for dear leader. The democrats will not only screw over this nation by raising everyone's health care premiums and related costs and taxes, the democrats will risk losing their own jobs for the man.
Fun.
Posted by: ethos at December 13, 2009 10:21 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 01:44 PM (ACkhT)
Welcome to the Dark Side, John. Did you pick up your cookies? We have cookies!
Posted by: stuiec at December 13, 2009 10:22 AM (Ate22)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 13, 2009 10:23 AM (SLMWU)
btw
Will Gibbs have a whine fest about Rasmussen next week?
Posted by: YIKES! at December 13, 2009 01:35 PM (/cfp9)
Will his mouth be open?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner At Large at December 13, 2009 10:26 AM (erIg9)
All Obama's unicorn promises are being delivered DOA.
Posted by: bill at December 13, 2009 10:30 AM (4RG6F)
Me too. 'Cept I'm a girl. So it's kinda the same except entirely different.
He's the real deal.
Posted by: mama winger at December 13, 2009 10:32 AM (Ue9UN)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 13, 2009 02:23 PM (SLMWU)
nope, see the thing is, he in his own words is a Marxist. He in his own words says "the US Constitution is fundamentally flawed" without once being challenged on this. He in his own words said "The US military is air raiding villages and killing civilians". He in his own words has a whole lotta of anti-american stuff on tape I am sure.
I voted for Bill Clinton, there was NO alternative media like the internet for voters to go check out things for themselves. This is not the case this time. Also, Bill Clinton was a very "I feel your pain" politician, he sure as hell would not have given a "shout out" before doing a "by the way, 13 american soldiers were shot today"
He cannot be what Bill clinton was, b/c Obama does not in his core believe in America, he only wanted power for power's sake. He doesn't realise and never will that most Americans want to give their votes to those who recognize that we are only temporarily giving authority to the govt to govern us NOT TO RULE US!
He never had the American experience, I work with many recent immigrants who are terrified of what is happening, because they came to this country to escape that oppressive govt crap. Obama will never realise this b/c he's never had the american experience, doesn't understand American Expectionalism and nor he want or care to! He has a true disdain for this country like no one I have ever seen in my life. So, for him to reject the lefty ideologue, he cannot, b/c he is the lefty ideologue, he cannot even fake leaving it (enough to convince Americans at least), because this is all he knows.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 10:34 AM (ACkhT)
Ain't that the truth. Obama can. not. win. this one no matter what the outcome.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is guilty. We know he's guilty. If KSM gets off on some technicality or activist jury, we'll have open revolt across the nation. Plus, Obama already prejudiced the process. An own-goal before even the sniff of a courtroom.
If KSM is convicted, so what? He was already guilty and could've been sequestered via the rational method, namely military tribunal. The legacy from the trial? An awful and dangerous precedent that weakens the country.
If during the trial there's an attack in NYC to get KSM released or as a target rich environment on the American system, a virtual billboard for jihadists, then catastrophic chaos ensues. No way can you defend such a high-density population center like you can a GITMO.
If there's no attack in NYC proper, there's the underlying scandal of an expensive show and the circus act of the defense to be used for global propaganda.
All of this is just the tip of the iceberg. I could go on. This is one of the worst decisions the Obama/Holder Justice Department, and Obama overall, could have possibly made. As much as the damage it will do to Obama politically is the silver lining, the cost is more tangible risk and damage to the nation short-term.
Yes, his numbers will plummet when that trial proceeds.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 13, 2009 10:36 AM (50S+L)
cookies? what about bacon??
ok-- I have no clue why you guys/gals keep mentioning bacon? must be some inside joke, I'm sorta new here.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 10:37 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: eman at December 13, 2009 10:42 AM (IERSf)
Seriously? Wow. And the hits keep coming.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 13, 2009 10:42 AM (50S+L)
I have to wonder what Reid has up his sleeve. He's probably going to get some small portion of the bill rated as acceptable, get his 60 votes, and then insert some major legislative language into the bill that NO one knows about. The bill will end up an unread mix of all the disastrous regulations, kick-backs, penalties, tax increases, and hidden costs that would have defeated the bill. -- Then it goes back to conference. The desperation is so obvious, the House is already saying - "yeah -um- we don't even need to see it, just take it on up to the president for signature."
Even leftists have to wonder where the honesty and transparency went?
Posted by: ethos at December 13, 2009 10:44 AM (0fzsA)
Are you a vegetarian, johnc? What would you consider the perfect food, if not bacon?
Posted by: Peaches at December 13, 2009 10:47 AM (9Wv2j)
the thing is, do these morons really think ,lets say they completely not tell the public what is in this deathcare plan, that once it is signed into law, we won't find out, that's when the backlash really begins. I mean SEVERE BACKLASH!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 10:48 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Charles' Johnson at December 13, 2009 10:48 AM (tm15w)
peaches, love Bacon, but had to give it up, I can't much of eat anything good now, but I still love my bacon egg and cheese biscuit once in a while
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 10:50 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 13, 2009 10:54 AM (Z0bVg)
Except in Manhattan.
Posted by: eman at December 13, 2009 01:12 PM (IERSf)
Tell me about it! I don't know why it surprises me (it really shouldn't) how far, far to the left so many of my coworkers are. I used to me a non- thinking leftie too but then I looked around at all the people in the supermarket paying with food stamps, standing in line outside the welfare office, all the children coming out of bilingual education illiterates in two languages, etc. All the while I saw 30%- 45% of my paycheck disappearing every week in taxes. I concluded all this spending on "social programs" really did more harm than good. Then 9/11 occurred. The only thing required to get from being a liberal to a conservative was to opening my eyes, asking some questions and engaging my brain a little. It wasn't that hard. But I am surrounded by leftist statist diehards. Then again I do work in the MSM. (Facepalm!!!)
Posted by: muggedbyreality at December 13, 2009 10:56 AM (QY0u0)
Bacon is good, just keep the pig farms a few miles from me ... one mile is too close when the wind is wrong.
Posted by: bill at December 13, 2009 10:56 AM (4RG6F)
Nah. You've been here long enough now. I mean, praise for Darth Cheney? I do believe the reprogramming is complete. You're full-on Moron™. And now the Importance of Bacon has been imparted. Your journey is complete, young Jedi.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 13, 2009 10:58 AM (50S+L)
Bummer about the bacon thing, though. I couldn't live without the stuff myself.
Posted by: Peaches at December 13, 2009 10:59 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Chad Feldhiemer at December 13, 2009 11:02 AM (Vc/xe)
From personal experience with some friends:
1. It's the end of the year. Time for reflection, contemplation and scoring Obama. Common wisdom had it that many people gave Obama a year to prove himself, end of year coming up, proof of incompetence is the only offering around.
2. End of year coming up and people are starting to consider that the past year has felt like 8 years ... and we've got 3 actual more years to go. People are going "WTF!? Three more years of this crap!??".
3. The whole "criticize Obama and you're a racist." has coupled with "criticize healthcare reform and you're a racist *and* a proponent of slavery" to result in "Fuck this crap!".
Posted by: memomachine at December 13, 2009 11:02 AM (/+tPT)
I know I certainly would. Hell, I might even go door to door to collect signatures.
Posted by: shibumi at December 13, 2009 11:04 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: naturalfake at December 13, 2009 11:07 AM (HylJ6)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner At Large at December 13, 2009 11:07 AM (erIg9)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 13, 2009 02:58 PM (50S+L)
lol, trust me a couple of years I was attending a couple of protests in DC against the darth vader. Ya should see what HillBuzz has to say as well, we are stunned that this is the conclusion we have now come to, its like awakening from the Matrix or somehting like that.
But, ya know self-preservation can bring out the patriotism in a person like nothing else can!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 11:08 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Peaches at December 13, 2009 11:09 AM (9Wv2j)
"don't we first need an impeachable offense? "
calling the US Constitution "fundamentally flawed"
saying that our US military does the following: "air raiding villages and killing civilians"
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 11:11 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: TheresaD at December 13, 2009 11:14 AM (iGCmo)
Posted by: pby at December 13, 2009 11:15 AM (MN2i7)
Posted by: Peaches at December 13, 2009 11:16 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: ushie at December 13, 2009 11:19 AM (1kwr2)
Posted by: pdxpunk at December 13, 2009 11:20 AM (4UMSM)
Peaches, I gotta agree with you with the truther thing. Do I think he is not eligible? YEP!
but to for a political party to take this approach would be horrible, people are already pissed off at his marxist antiamerican policies, no need to make people feel sorry for him
BUT, if at a townhall meeting, a veteran directly questions him, why he won't show his BC or any college records, I am all for this!! An average citizen will have to expose him.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 11:21 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: excem13 at December 13, 2009 11:22 AM (lYKj1)
Posted by: Peaches at December 13, 2009 11:23 AM (9Wv2j)
If falling polar bears manage to to take out both at once, we get President Pelosi.
And if Osama pulled off the trifecta, we'd end up with President Clinton.
That's what's called defense in depth.
Now, frankly, I think Biden would probably be a better president than Obama is (you'd have to go a long way down the food chain to find something that wouldn't be) but if someone's going to float impeachment against America's First President Of Color (tm) it'd better be an ironclad, unsinkable case.
Posted by: mrkwong at December 13, 2009 11:25 AM (G8Eo0)
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 11:26 AM (ACkhT)
you guys may not have been paying attention, but late 2007/ early 2008, Bill Clinton was quoted as saying "He;s not constitutionally qualified", that's about the time the raccist charge was started to be played against Hillary and Bill
so, do I think most of DC knows about this? YES. Just like the MSM and golfers knew about Tiger's many women. They are covering for him.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 11:29 AM (ACkhT)
Won't happen. Joe the Plumber moments cannot happen anymore. Obama is as choreographed and shielded as ever. He cannot possibly afford to meet with regular folk and his permanent campaign knows it. The guy won't even answer more than a question or two in relatively controlled audiences, and controlled audiences are Axelrod's forte. Remember Copenhagen and the Nobel speech? Two(!) questions from a universally sympathetic audience -- only one (!!) from American press. Pathetic.
Obama is running in plain sight. His action (or should I say the action of his managers) is dependent on operating in the shadows, aka Hopenchange Transparency.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 13, 2009 11:30 AM (50S+L)
I have trouble buying into the conspiracy theory. But, nothing would please me more than to see all the shit come out on this poseur, now that so many people, of every stripe, are losing their rose-colored glasses.
Posted by: Peaches at December 13, 2009 11:38 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 13, 2009 11:44 AM (SLMWU)
peaches, I don't think it will ever come out, it take an enoumous effort to impeach someone.
But the important part is keeping it in people's consciouness, people will say "its just a birth certificate and college records, why the hell won't he realease them?".."WHy is he spending 2 million a year to cover up all his records?"
and that doubt will always stay in people's minds. and grow as he tries to cramp down all these anti-America marxist crap !
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at December 13, 2009 11:44 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Peaches at December 13, 2009 11:55 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: torabora at December 13, 2009 11:57 AM (zHRu0)
I'm sure the FBI and DOJ are watching access like hawks. I wouldn't touch those records with a cattle prod from inside the university.
Now, if there were some off-site warehouse with tape backups somewhere that weren't being monitored...I'm just saying.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 13, 2009 11:58 AM (W4ma1)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 13, 2009 02:23 PM (SLMWU)
-------------------
What happened to Clinton when he did that? I wasn't politically aware back then. Did his base get all POd and scream that he'd sold out and then more of the moderates moved to his side?
Posted by: arhooley at December 13, 2009 12:22 PM (VuFy0)
Posted by: RushBabe at December 13, 2009 12:25 PM (LKkE8)
Posted by: Peaches at December 13, 2009 12:28 PM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: KG at December 13, 2009 12:45 PM (S8TF5)
On that Rass link I liked this:
Yet a lot of the most vocal opposition to the Democratic initiatives isn’t coming from traditional Republican ranks but from so-called “Tea Party” critics. Therein lies a serious potential problem for the GOP because running under the Tea Party brand may be better in congressional races than being a Republican. In a three-way Generic Ballot test, Democrats attract 36% of the vote and the Tea Party candidate picks up 23%. Republicans finish dead last with 18%.
On F&F this morning they had a guy on there from a Teaparty group from somewhere. The Fox babe was badgering him about "hurting the GOP". His response was they want to take over the GOP.
I'm sure the big tent squishies just loved to hear that.
Posted by: Vic at December 13, 2009 12:50 PM (CDUiN)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 13, 2009 01:02 PM (SLMWU)
Nope, Clinton was shit and his supposed "triangulation" and movement to the center was media BS hype. He may have not been as big a communist as Bambi but he was no centrist either.
Posted by: Vic at December 13, 2009 01:19 PM (CDUiN)
Posted by: jjshaka at December 13, 2009 01:19 PM (RFfoG)
Seen this comment in the Calgary Sun about global propaganda and Obama, pretty much sums it up for me and i think the rest of the country. I also would add that ,for me, Tiger Woods and Obama are starting to like one in the same.....we are starting to see the truth about both of them come out and people are starting to lose hope and really starting to move out of the denial phase. I think Woods is making people believe that they can be had....
=======================
The media's in their pocket, Hollywood's in their pocket, and the new U.S. president is a big-government whack job.
The nature of the program doesn't matter to him, just as long as it restricts economic and political liberty.
Posted by: jjs at December 13, 2009 01:26 PM (dvMRG)
According to Wikipedia (unreliable, yes I know):
The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States" who may only be impeached and removed for "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors".
C'mon. It's been a year. There has to be some bribery or high crime going on in the Obama admin.
Here's my plan:
1. Retake House/ Senate
2. Discover Impeachable Offense
3. Impeach
4. Celebrate!
And yes, I know this means President Biden, but I do NOT believe he wants to destroy America.
Posted by: shibumi at December 13, 2009 01:29 PM (OKZrE)
A lot of people connect Obama with Tiger, rightly or wrongly.
Set aside the fact that Tiger has earned his position because of his talent and accomplishments. Forgetting that, they both are silk pillow riders who were treated with godlike reverence.
Tiger's ignominious fall reminds some of the remaining Obama edge sitters that the boy king's mystique is all a sham and that he is a manufactured creation controlled by one-world wannabe arisotcrats who could give a shit about anybody but themselves..
Posted by: proreason at December 13, 2009 01:34 PM (Rllt+)
141 And yes, I know this means President Biden, but I do NOT believe he wants to destroy America.
No, Biden's not the kind of guy who'd wreck the country on purpose, any more than Lucy meant to burn a hole in Ricky's favorite shirt on purpose. And afterwards, the smoldering mess would be accompanied by an endearing "Waaaah!" and a wacky facial expression, so we'd just have to forgive him, the scamp.
Posted by: BKWillis at December 13, 2009 01:42 PM (nLMhW)
The science is settled, denialists!
Posted by: Charles John's son at December 13, 2009 01:48 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: rawmuse at December 13, 2009 01:52 PM (SLMWU)
See, that's why I'm doing The Opposite. Worked for George Costanza
I figure in a few weeks I'll have enough cash rolling in to buy Ace's bandwidth provider out and ban all of you.
Posted by: Charles John's son at December 13, 2009 01:52 PM (sYxEE)
First Q: Who is the most outstanding male political figure?
I have a mancrush on Paul Ryan.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at December 13, 2009 01:25 PM (DPM1U)
I'd have to go with John Thune.
Posted by: RushBabe at December 13, 2009 01:57 PM (LKkE8)
This? Just a flesh wound. I've had worse.
Posted by: Kudlow the Black Knight at December 13, 2009 01:57 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: toby928 at December 13, 2009 02:51 PM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at December 13, 2009 04:09 PM (PQY7w)
Posted by: Contributor X at December 13, 2009 05:50 PM (IhX2x)
Posted by: whiskey at December 13, 2009 07:30 PM (L03mw)
Posted by: zella at December 14, 2009 02:21 AM (Nm8bZ)
It will be interesting to see how things unfold. Can we outlast Obama before Obama turns into a nybrid of Putin and Chavez? I dunno. It's gonna be close.
Where you find the best free galleries online.
Posted by: Armuss at January 06, 2010 12:44 PM (/MeoU)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2074 seconds, 280 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








FIFY
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner At Large at December 13, 2009 09:03 AM (erIg9)