December 10, 2009
— Purple Avenger
Posted by: Purple Avenger at
01:00 PM
| Comments (72)
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: RobD at December 10, 2009 01:08 PM (sV3Dv)
Someone in the comments posted a better version.
Posted by: Iskandar at December 10, 2009 01:10 PM (u1pln)
Seriously. CLICK THE LINK.
Amazing stuff, thanks purple avenger. BTW, did you notice it looks like we're about 15% into a new ice age, one that is about to send temperatures plunging??
Posted by: Max Power at December 10, 2009 01:10 PM (q177U)
Posted by: Charles Johnson's Science Mentor at December 10, 2009 01:10 PM (wnU1W)
Posted by: CUS at December 10, 2009 01:11 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Jean at December 10, 2009 01:11 PM (PjevJ)
Posted by: Global Warming Cabal at December 10, 2009 01:11 PM (muhdt)
I know my crib in south Florida is going to be worth a mint soon ;->
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 01:13 PM (yckbe)
Wow! This blows right past the hockey team and the CRU idiots. It doesn't even matter that they've been lying their asses off, (not in climate terms, although they should still all be ass-raped with a fencepost just for being the dickbags they are), because the scale is so wrong. In the long view, their puny .5 deg. C or whatever warming means almost nothing. In fact, we should be grateful for it, assuming that it is really happening.
We should all be wearing shirts with these graphs on them because this is the kind of thing that anyone can see and understand.
Posted by: rickinstl at December 10, 2009 01:15 PM (0AEWQ)
We told you! We told you!!! A new Ice Age issa comin'!
But did you listen to us? Nooooooo.... You all had to rush to your new BFF, Global Warming, as the latest thing taht's gonna kill us all.
But we told you, didn't we?
Posted by: Time Magazine, circa 1973 at December 10, 2009 01:15 PM (wWwJR)
Posted by: RobD at December 10, 2009 01:17 PM (sV3Dv)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at December 10, 2009 01:18 PM (A46hP)
"The North Polar ice cap is melting before our very eyes. It's been the size of the continental United States for most of the last three million years and now, suddenly, 40 percent of it's gone, and the rest of it is expected to disappear within five, 10, 15 years"
Serious question: Is any part of this accurate?
Posted by: the professional sockpuppeteer at December 10, 2009 01:19 PM (9X3KM)
Rich new ummm..."feeding grounds" in the NYC and D.C. areas if you're willing to adjust your diet somewhat.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 01:20 PM (yckbe)
Posted by: Chiropractor at December 10, 2009 01:22 PM (QKKT0)
IOW, keel-haul da bums.
Posted by: TennDon at December 10, 2009 01:23 PM (o6Yv2)
Go to WUWT and scroll down. On the right there is a graph that looks like a sine wave. It is a graph of average sea ice and goes back to 2002. As you can see the amount of ice has not changed all that much and we are actually right about average right now.
Posted by: RobD at December 10, 2009 01:24 PM (sV3Dv)
was this graph drawn with the same crayons that Gallup uses?
Posted by: Robert Gibbs at December 10, 2009 01:24 PM (wnU1W)
Maybe Planet Of The Apes was in fact a documentary sent back from the future?
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 01:24 PM (yckbe)
Posted by: t-bird at December 10, 2009 01:25 PM (FcR7P)
Ice age a comin'. Time to stock up on fur coats, fur hats, fur mittens.....
Oh wait, then we'll piss peta off.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at December 10, 2009 01:25 PM (cniXs)
It was called "Global Warming...Compared to What?" As the geologist put it, we've been warming for 1800 centuries so far. Why all the drama now?
Long story short: Scientists have ALWAYS known that the hockey stick was all a matter of BS perspective.
Anyway here it is:
http://www.brynmawr.edu/emeritus/gather/Platt/platt_1.html
Posted by: Travis at December 10, 2009 01:27 PM (BfVjr)
Posted by: maddogg at December 10, 2009 01:27 PM (OlN4e)
It's a shame I'm not going to live another 5,000 years. I'd love to corner the livin' shit out of the wool coat/snow-shoe/fire wood/hand-warmer/long-underwear markets.
Those ads for Costa Rican property are looking mighty fine, right about now.
Posted by: Sharkman at December 10, 2009 01:27 PM (Zj8fM)
thanks, RobD.
So Algore's claim of a 40% reduction is complete bullshit. Where does he get this figure?
Posted by: the professional sockpuppeteer at December 10, 2009 01:31 PM (9X3KM)
With an ice age on its way, the smart money is investing heavily in quality lace wigs.
Posted by: Lace Wig Flogger at December 10, 2009 01:32 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Paladin at December 10, 2009 01:34 PM (a+kMW)
During the MWP there were large oak forests in Scandanavia!! They aren't there now.
Posted by: Travis at December 10, 2009 01:35 PM (BfVjr)
Today's Arctic Satellite Image
Thirty day Arctic Satellite Images slide show
Posted by: Hugh Jasteroid at December 10, 2009 01:36 PM (lD4DZ)
"So Algore's claim of a 40% reduction is complete bullshit. Where does he get this figure?" out of his ass?
Posted by: thethinman at December 10, 2009 01:36 PM (W3XUk)
Posted by: Vic at December 10, 2009 01:37 PM (CDUiN)
Posted by: The picture guy at December 10, 2009 01:39 PM (GqVbA)
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at December 10, 2009 01:41 PM (nE6Eu)
Posted by: TennDon at December 10, 2009 01:46 PM (o6Yv2)
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at December 10, 2009 01:50 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 01:51 PM (yckbe)
Posted by: Reiver at December 10, 2009 01:51 PM (mNUaF)
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at December 10, 2009 01:54 PM (UOM48)
That was a very nice article, PA.
The most interesting thing to me is the seventh chart. The glacials and interglacials. Note the colder, colder, colder, SNAP; colder, colder, colder, SNAP, etc. Interesting. AGW medicine men have narrowed the signal-to-noise ratio w/r/t interesting and useful topics like "triggers" or "climate triggers," but there's evidence of a trigger event right there. Something happens after lengthy, growing glacial periods that switches the heat on. It's interesting to think of what that might be.
The thing that makes the most sense to me is methane hydrates. As the oceans freeze up over land, water levels drop. The only thing keeping methane hydrates from blowing their wad is the pressure of the deep ocean. As water levels drop, the cork is popped, and the methane hydrates turn to gas. This time, bad gas. Not excellent, friendly CO2--the kind of gas you'd like to share a beer with.
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 01:54 PM (Kw4cI)
50. Copenhagen weather is predicted to deteriorate next week dropping below freezing with snow.
Maybe America will get lucky and obamao will get snowed in for the rest of his term.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at December 10, 2009 01:57 PM (cniXs)
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 01:58 PM (Kw4cI)
I wonder what the "reloading" mechanism would be that puts them back so the cycle can continue?
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 02:20 PM (yckbe)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at December 10, 2009 02:26 PM (PQY7w)
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 02:32 PM (Kw4cI)
This is interesting. "Methane clathrates" appears to be another term for it, and there's already a theory, the "methane clathrate gun." I kinda like that. 'Cept I thought of it w/o their help.
Still looking for something specific on the formation of the deposits. Research and destroy mission.
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 02:38 PM (Kw4cI)
Frankly I'm more worried about the downfall of civilization on the cold side...
For those who had classes in DiffEQ's, Dynamic systems, LaPlace Transforms or Fourier Transforms, the fact that output of a complex system is not linear, but sinusoidal wouldn't be too much of a surprise... Now for lawyers, and failed divinity students, that might not be intuitively obvious...
Posted by: phreshone at December 10, 2009 02:40 PM (wQx2m)
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 02:42 PM (Kw4cI)
Two models have been proposed to account for the formation of methane hydrates and the development of BSRs: (1) the BSR is caused by hydrate overlying gas-saturated sediment and (2) the BSR is caused by hydrate overlying brine-saturated sediment. The first model assumes the local generation of methane from organic material at the depth of the hydrate. Gradual thickening and thus deepening of the hydrated zone causes it eventually to subside into a temperature region where hydrate is unstable. Consequently, free gas can be present in this region Kvenvolden and Barnard (1983a). The BSR is then caused by the impedance contrast at the base of the hydrated zone and the top of the gas layer. The second model, in contrast, supports the formation of methane hydrates through the removal of methane from rising pore fluids being expelled from deeper in the sediment section Hyndman and Davis (1992). Most of the methane is generated microbially at a depth below the hydrate stability zone, but not at depths sufficient for the formation of thermogenic methane. Therefore, free gas does not have to be present beneath the BSR. In this case, the BSR can be the consequence of the impedance contrast between overlying sediments containing substantial amounts of hydrate and underlying brine-saturated sediments.
Posted by: Jek Porkins (rdb) at December 10, 2009 02:46 PM (Kw4cI)
As I (very dimly) remember my partial differential equations class, in a chaotic system we might see an alternation of peaks and troughs; but we won't do well predicting where the peaks are, nor how long they'll last, nor how large they'll be.
I have in mind Lorenz's three "butterfly" equations.
The Pleistocene didn't follow the chaotic pattern; the ice ages look regular (and yes, the natural state of the Pleistocene seems to be testis-freezingly COLD). Since the geography of the continents hasn't changed and since I haven't seen any evidence that the nature of the sun has changed, I can't see how we're not overdue for iced-over scrota worldwide.
Posted by: Zimriel at December 10, 2009 03:10 PM (04p0/)
Posted by: Zimriel at December 10, 2009 03:12 PM (04p0/)
So the Motley CRUe hasn't just been hiding the decline, they've only been showing a very small part of the history that can be seen if one is willing to look?
Posted by: manofaiki at December 10, 2009 03:18 PM (uSh7j)
Posted by: phreshone at December 10, 2009 03:20 PM (wQx2m)
Posted by: Al at December 10, 2009 03:35 PM (0lyUI)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 10, 2009 04:06 PM (yckbe)
Posted by: Jean at December 10, 2009 06:46 PM (xCBQ4)
I'm glad I'm retiring to the Philippines. I don't really like the current 90 degrees with 90% humidity. I'm in luck. Just have to wait a bit. Looks like 80/80 comin' right up. That'll do me just fine while all the eco-Nazis and other airheads here in The Peoples Republic of Minnesota deal with really cold weather a' la North Slope.
I would really like to live long enough to watch the leading edge of the glaciers arrive in New Orleans.
Posted by: chuck in st paul at December 11, 2009 06:57 AM (adr25)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.186 seconds, 200 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.









My goodness. Look at the last graph on the page. It looks as though the temperature changes are almost cyclical!
Shocking.
Posted by: wiserbud at December 10, 2009 01:05 PM (tWf3S)