December 16, 2009
— DrewM You may notice that many of your favorite military blogs don't have any new posts today. That's because, as Jonn Lilyea of This AinÂ’t Hell writes in an email, there's an organized day of silence.
The reason for this is two-fold. First, milblogs are facing an increasingly hostile environment from within the military. While senior leadership has embraced blogging and social media, many field grade officers and senior NCOs do not embrace the concept. From general apathy in not wanting to deal with the issue to outright hositility to it, many commands are not only failing to support such activities, but are aggressively acting against active duty milbloggers, milspouses, and others. The number of such incidents appears to be growing, with milbloggers receiving reprimands, verbal and written, not only for their activities but those of spouses and supporters.The catalyst has been the treatment of milblogger C.J. Grisham of A Soldier's Perspective (http://www.soldiersperspective.us/). C.J. has earned accolades and respect, from the White House on down for his honest, and sometimes blunt, discussion of issues -- particularly PTSD. In the last few months, C.J. has seen an issue with a local school taken to his command who failed to back him, and has even seen his effort to deal with PTSD, and lead his men in same by example, used against him as a part of this. Ultimately, C.J. has had to sell his blog to help raise funds for his defense in this matter.
I'm not familiar with Master Sgt. Grisham's blogging but a lot of milbloggers I read and respect are and they are supporting him. This is not a group apt to fly off the handle and complain at small slights. As a group they are, in the words of the Declaration of Independence, "more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed." I think the fact that they have taken this step shows the importance they attach to this issue.
Milbloggers have served an important function since their rise to prominence. As someone will no military experience IÂ’ve found their insights invaluable to understanding and appreciating the men and women who serve our nation in this time of war.
As a blogger here at the HQ, IÂ’ve been able to find stories that I wouldnÂ’t have otherwise known about or been able to add details and perspective that simply arenÂ’t available from other sources.
To my mind, their most important contribution has been in countering the various slanders the left and the media have attempted to lay on this generation of servicemen and women. Thanks to milbloggers, the Scott Beauchamps and Jessie MacBeths of the world are exposed for what they are and this generation of soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen wonÂ’t be defined by those hostile to them.
Change is scary for any organization and as I’m sure the milbloggers will tell you, there are many in the military who ‘get’ what they do and value their efforts. No doubt they also understand there are rightfully lines that have to be drawn and not crossed.
Hopefully this day of protest and the attention it will draw will hasten the militaryÂ’s ability to strike the right balance.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:42 AM
| Comments (26)
Post contains 556 words, total size 3 kb.
As someone who also does not have military experience (and this is something I regret on occasion), milbloggers provide a great deal of insight, just as you described.
This is an incredibly important function with proportionally fewer members of our population having military experience.
Posted by: grognard at December 16, 2009 07:00 AM (v0kvW)
Look, in the military, you can expect to be held accountable for your actions. And often held to a higher standard. Fair enough. Comes with the paycheck.
But for 30 years, the DoD has trumpeted how important they think spouses are, but they love to ding guys for things the spouse does. Walk the walk, don't just talk the talk.
Posted by: XBradTC at December 16, 2009 07:12 AM (y0E9v)
Posted by: fluffy, 11B at December 16, 2009 07:14 AM (4Kl5M)
The ArmyTimes has a rundown here: http://tiny.cc/cOF74
Name and Shame (Col. Robert Pastorelli and Command Sgt. Maj. Rickey Cooper) just make sure you spell the names right.
Write your congressman and see what you can do about these politicized careerist chickensh!ts. They have essentially trashed Grisham's military career, time to return the favor and get rid of these bastards.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at December 16, 2009 07:23 AM (F09Uo)
I'm suspicious of PTSD in the absence of genuine brain damage. It's more like ADHD or something -- way over-diagnosed. There's a reason those "field grade officers and senior NCOs" don't embrace something.
If heavy/binge drinking is a symptom of PTSD, I had PTSD before I went in the Navy. That first year of college must have done it.
Posted by: Randall Hoven at December 16, 2009 07:27 AM (yxBFl)
Randall,
I don't think PTSD means what you think it means.
Start here.
Posted by: DrewM. at December 16, 2009 07:30 AM (FCWQb)
Did he leave himself open to harrassment from that? Yeah. But that's not what got the ball rolling. It was the kerfuffle with the school board that got him in trouble.
And notice, when the School Board first called his Chain of Command, the company commander basically told them to fuck off. It wasn't until they contacted the higher ups that things went sideways.
Posted by: XBradTC at December 16, 2009 07:34 AM (y0E9v)
I'm suspicious of PTSD in the absence of genuine brain damage. It's more like ADHD or something -- way over-diagnosed. There's a reason those "field grade officers and senior NCOs" don't embrace something.
Posted by: Randall Hoven at December 16, 2009 11:27 AM (yxBFl)
Randall, you're describing TBI more than PTSD. TBI is Traumatic Brain Injury which happens when a bomb or something goes off close to you. PTSD is a psychological disorder which happens when you see something traumatic. In his case, he was in the shit and saw at least one of his close friends die right in front of him. I'm sure he saw more than just that. My guess is that his PTSD is legitimate, he wasn't a fobbit.
With regard to the Army hassling him and ruining his career, they should have never gotten involved. This was strictly a matter between he and his wife, and the civilian school board. The Army should have told the school board it was none of their business. Army or not, he still has the same rights as any other American citizen in this regard.
Posted by: Ace Bundy at December 16, 2009 07:54 AM (EhlQq)
Posted by: Jean at December 16, 2009 07:55 AM (pIKTP)
Posted by: Jean at December 16, 2009 07:59 AM (7K04W)
Posted by: Horatius at December 16, 2009 08:03 AM (ZJcX+)
Posted by: General Apathy at December 16, 2009 08:05 AM (T1boi)
Posted by: XBradTC at December 16, 2009 08:38 AM (y0E9v)
Posted by: moron # 23511 at December 16, 2009 08:46 AM (p1s9n)
Posted by: Jean at December 16, 2009 08:59 AM (5ddCw)
CJ has overwhelming evidence that the school board and the school administration have lied about their actions. He has video of his activities disproving all the claims made to his command.
American soldiers, especially those with records like CJ, do not deserve to be treated like this. American citizens do not deserve to be treated like this.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins at December 16, 2009 09:11 AM (2up88)
Posted by: Horatius at December 16, 2009 09:25 AM (ZJcX+)
Interestingly, when his chain of command had him remove posts from his blog (which they can, by regulation, require) it was the video of the school board meeting that they had him take down.
Posted by: XBradTC at December 16, 2009 10:05 AM (y0E9v)
CJ's criticism of the fools in his chain was 100% accurate, 100% legitimate and 100% heroic. They are a problem, not only for him but for his brothers in the military. When you're criticized for a spouse raging our of control that's wrong... and when the spouse isn't raging out of control and is actually being lied about, and you can prove it, it's downright ridiculous. Also, anti-semitic.
I am really tired from kicking all the asses of everyone in my ninja dojo who disagrees with me about this, or I would go down there and set things straight with my badass attitude and surly sense of honor. Andrew Sullivan's head is full of semen.
Posted by: Lame and Irrelevant Jeff Goldstein Impersonation at December 16, 2009 10:24 AM (uLHPW)
The comment about O-5s and O-6s is true - they will literally do ANYTHING to make flag.
Posted by: Dave Head at December 16, 2009 10:25 AM (QsoEC)
CJ has overwhelming evidence that the school board and the school administration have lied about their actions. He has video of his activities disproving all the claims made to his command.
American soldiers, especially those with records like CJ, do not deserve to be treated like this. American citizens do not deserve to be treated like this.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins"
This is the most succint description I've seen. It's totally accurate. But I also noticed during the videos that some people in that board meeting were openly contemptuous of our military... acting like he was going to up and kill them because he spoke frankly about PTSD (not that he brought it up at the board meeting, they snooped). Treating a polite man like he's a super scary threat because he's a soldier is abominable.
These people hate our troops. Their names should be famous. I'm busy training for covert ops in 2050 AD Detroit, safety not guaranteed, of I would go down there and by the force of my force alone, be badass about this.
Posted by: Lame and Irrelevant Jeff Goldstein Impersonation at December 16, 2009 10:31 AM (uLHPW)
Posted by: Horatius at December 16, 2009 10:37 AM (ZJcX+)
Posted by: Horatius at December 16, 2009 10:56 AM (ZJcX+)
Posted by: Horatius at December 16, 2009 11:50 AM (ksAkX)
Posted by: Horatius at December 16, 2009 11:55 AM (ksAkX)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2873 seconds, 154 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Seriously though, good post Drew.
Posted by: Rocks at December 16, 2009 06:55 AM (Q1lie)