December 06, 2009

"The Big Cutoff:" Another Climate Email Exposed
— Ace

This one not hacked, but sent to a hostile party. Who promptly published it.

Andrew Revkin is so beloved by the CRU warmists they fondly call him "Andy" in their emails. He's also the guy who refused to publish these disgusting hacked emails on his... um, climate blog, which you'd think could at least print a few so that his readers would understand the hottest climate story in the world.

So he's on the team. Bought and paid for, but not bought and paid for; just owned, by personal choice.

But in a blog post, he mentioned Copenhagen prostitutes offering "green" conference-goers free sex (once again, the dime drops that maybe we're on the wrong team here: nothin' but fondue and sodomy over on that side), and also mentioned a bit of the ClimateGate controversy, including the "tribalism" some of the CRU crew stand accused of.

So: This guy is on the team. He'd basically offer Al Gore a free hand release himself, except that he doesn't want to be sweated on by a husky hick. But he mentioned ClimateGate.

And for that, he gets this blistering rebuke and threat from cultist professor Michael Schlesinger of the University of Illinois.

Andy:

Copenhagen prostitutes?

Climate prostitutes?

Shame on you for this gutter reportage. [Emphasis added.]

This is the second time this week I have written you thereon, the first about giving space in your blog to the Pielkes.

The vibe that I am getting from here, there and everywhere is that your reportage is very worrisome to most climate scientists.

Of course, your blog is your blog.

But, I sense that you are about to experience the 'Big Cutoff' from those of us who believe we can no longer trust you, me included. [Emphasis added.]

Copenhagen prostitutes?

Unbelievable and unacceptable.

What are you doing and why?

Michael

What is he doing? He's reporting facts. Professor Schlesinger ought to give it a try and see if it suits him.

"The Big Cutoff" refers, of course, to an end of the tips, free quotes, free background stuff, etc., that the climate-mongers have been offering Revkin. In other words, they're threatening to blacklist him from their rolodexes and no longer return his calls, leaving him a reporter without sources in the field he's supposed to be covering. (And doing a poor job of it even with those sources, note.)

Glad to see there's none of that "tribalism" among this claque! Good to put that particular false rumor to bed!

Meanwhile, this article at American Thinker by Marc Sheppard explains the "hide the decline" and the Medieval Warm Period and why thew warmists are so determined to kill it, and, well, lots of stuff. Another must-read piece.

The piece LauraW. linked earlier exposes a whole new area of shenanigans, too.

Update: Via Hot Air, Hmmmm...: Did Russian spies hack and leak the HARRY_READ_ME file to sabotage Copenhagen?

Note: I originally wrote the email was "leaked" but realize now that is inaccurate and misleading: Steven Hayward is on the circulation list, and published it on his blog, stating that he was doing so. This doesn't seem to be a "leak," as that implies a stealthy, anonymous revealer, so that word seems wrong.

Posted by: Ace at 07:08 PM | Comments (96)
Post contains 546 words, total size 4 kb.

1 I sense that you are about to experience the 'Big Cutoff' from those of us who believe we can no longer trust you, me included

Why does this sound like dialogue from "Public Enemies" or "Goodfellas"?

Posted by: Techie at December 06, 2009 07:12 PM (cxW4X)

2 Join gang green-free sex in hopenhagen

Posted by: chicocano at December 06, 2009 07:12 PM (2n5cq)

3

"The Big Cutoff" refers, of course, to an end of the tips, free quotes, free background stuff, etc., that the climate-mongers have been offering Revkin.

I guess he'll finally have credibility. 

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 06, 2009 07:15 PM (r1h5M)

4 Hey, people like Michael are super serial! 

Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at December 06, 2009 07:19 PM (otlXg)

5

Maybe he was upset about the guy telling everyone about the free hookers? Can't be THAT many to go around........

 

Posted by: wytshus at December 06, 2009 07:19 PM (C8byF)

6

"The Big Cutoff" refers, of course, to an end of the tips, free quotes, free background stuff, etc., that the climate-mongers have been offering Revkin.

And party invites.  And cocktails.

Posted by: rdbrewer at December 06, 2009 07:28 PM (nf+Ll)

7 You damned well better stop mentioning the fact that we blacklist people who disagree with us or you're gonna get blacklisted.

Posted by: Def Leppard at December 06, 2009 07:30 PM (hIOnV)

8 Andy sounds like a familiar from the Blade movies. 

Posted by: Eddie Baby at December 06, 2009 07:33 PM (LbTt5)

9 (once again, the dime drops that maybe we're on the wrong team here: nothin' but fondue and sodomy over on that side)

So I'm not the only one whose been noticing an increase of such reporting about how awesome (-ly generate) it is to be a liberal for the past year or so?

Posted by: Tom in Korea at December 06, 2009 07:33 PM (nS7nk)

10 Andy Revkin?

What an asshole!

Posted by: Professor Andrew Watson at December 06, 2009 07:34 PM (ToM4s)

11 Steve Hayward?

What an asshole!

Posted by: Professor Andrew Watson at December 06, 2009 07:34 PM (ToM4s)

12 If golf is a sport, then so is croquet.

Posted by: toby928 at December 06, 2009 07:38 PM (PD1tk)

13 I had a top greenie lawyer for the Audubon Society once say at a conference that "I regard the National Association of Home Builders to be every bit as evil as the National Rifle Association."  My comeback was: "I can understand why you'd think that about the home builders, but what's your problem with the NRA?"  The guy didn't even crack a smile.)

Okay, that's some funny shit right there.

Posted by: Rocks at December 06, 2009 07:38 PM (ToM4s)

14 dammit

Posted by: toby928 at December 06, 2009 07:38 PM (PD1tk)

15 It honestly doesn't matter how the emails got out, or who did it. What matters is that they are valid, and represent a conspiracy to defame and defraud people on a global scale.

Posted by: enoxo at December 06, 2009 07:41 PM (p0Ddl)

16 "Good tests kill flawed theories; we remain alive to guess again. Or, barring that, be sure to be as vindictive as possible.*"

Karl Popper
*IMHMUTLP

Posted by: Iskandar at December 06, 2009 07:42 PM (u1pln)

17 Did the BBC get their emails from the Russian source? Or did the BB have them 1st and not publish them, so whoever "stole" them sent to the Russians so the emails would become public?

Posted by: Dr. Spank at December 06, 2009 07:42 PM (muUqs)

18 If golf is a sport, then so is croquet.

Posted by: toby928 at December 06, 2009 11:38 PM (PD1tk)


I have loved golf all my life. It is not a sport. Certainly not as the Pros play it. Maybe when you have to carry your own clubs and schlep it over the entire course during a match in high school it can be termed an endurance sport.

But I think the fact that John Daly, Craig Stadler and yes Jack Nicklaus (who was a fatty as a young man) can rise to be top professionals pretty much destroys an idea that golf is a sport.

Golf is a game.....the greatest game ever invented.

Posted by: Rocks at December 06, 2009 07:43 PM (ToM4s)

19 "The Big Cutoff" refers, of course, to an end of the tips, free quotes, free background stuff, etc., that the climate-mongers have been offering Revkin.

but not appearently free hookers!  The "Team" pays for its fun.

Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2009 07:44 PM (xCBQ4)

20 What about the version of golf in which your score is function of time as well?

Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2009 07:45 PM (xCBQ4)

21 We gots to have our free hookers or we'd look like morons.

Posted by: Climate Scientists at December 06, 2009 07:46 PM (muUqs)

22 Did the BBC get their emails from the Russian source? Or did the BB have them 1st and not publish them, so whoever "stole" them sent to the Russians so the emails would become public?

Posted by: Dr. Spank at December 06, 2009 11:42 PM (muUqs)


The Russians simply provided a place to post them. The files were known for a month prior to them hitting  the Russian site. The Russians would never have offered these to a British reporter first. They would just do what they did and get them out there and everywhere. Someone inside CRU compiled and leaked them. If it was a hack they would have known exactly how it happened already from logs.

Posted by: Rocks at December 06, 2009 07:46 PM (ToM4s)

Posted by: Climate Scientists at December 06, 2009 07:48 PM (muUqs)

24 I think the "Big Cutoff" is coming for Mike Schlesinger followed by collegial anathema and lots of audits, he should take those free hookers up on their offer -- it is going to be a rough year.

Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2009 07:49 PM (xCBQ4)

25 Have the climate scientists taken on Chaz J's "disagree and you are banned" or did they learn it from him?

Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 06, 2009 07:50 PM (PNqW6)

26 I'd tell you the best thing about golf, but my wife would kill me.

Posted by: Tiger Woods at December 06, 2009 07:50 PM (04p0/)

27 25
Crap correction

or did he learn it from them

Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 06, 2009 07:51 PM (PNqW6)

28

In the Orange County register today (supposedly a "right wing" paper) they had a 3 page spread in the Sunday print edition main news section on Climate Change and not ONE SINGLE word on Climategate.  There was an article titled "Christian Book Backs Climate Change".  There was a list of what countries are doing to prepare for Copenhagen;  Australia according to the OC Register "wants to slash emissions by 25%".  No mention of the Liberal Party leadership failing on the issue and the new leader killing ETS early in the week. A great scary page of graphics. 

I imagine the news team thinks they are being objective and following the science, but they just come off as clueless.

 

Posted by: motionview at December 06, 2009 07:51 PM (KgG1I)

29 Someone prominent needs to kill the meme that this was a hack -- it was a leak by a whistleblower.  Maybe if I ran the emails through a pdfmaker with a watermark that reads TOP SECRET, the NY Times would publish them.

Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2009 07:52 PM (xCBQ4)

30 This attitude of "write nice stuff about us or we'll freeze you out" is straight out of "V".

Posted by: Zimriel at December 06, 2009 07:52 PM (04p0/)

31 The . Starring Rabbi Ron Jeremy.

Posted by: Guy in a zombie-proof bunker at December 06, 2009 07:53 PM (pD9ab)

32 I had a top greenie lawyer for the Audubon Society once say at a conference that "I regard the National Association of Home Builders to be every bit as evil as the National Rifle Association."  My comeback was: "I can understand why you'd think that about the home builders, but what's your problem with the NRA?"  The guy didn't even crack a smile.)

Okay, that's some funny shit right there.

Indeed, and representative.  One of the the great myths of liberalism is that liberals have great senses of humor.  They don't.  And they are utterly incapable of making fun of themselves or their beliefs.

Posted by: Tom in Korea at December 06, 2009 07:53 PM (nS7nk)

33 If I were a prominent Lefty I would avoid saying anything about the NRA, the 2nd Amendment, or gun rights now.  They are getting their asses kicked on all fronts and the NRA Big Guns are still in reserve.

Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2009 07:56 PM (xCBQ4)

34 science fraud + schadenfreude = scienfraude Hard to be sorry for these people, LOL. NBC Nightly News tacked on a segment at the end of their Copenhagen report tonight about Climategate. So full of "seems to be suggesting" and "perhapses" and "peer reviewed by others so science is settled" crap, but mentioned it nonetheless.

Posted by: Liz Lemon at December 06, 2009 07:58 PM (DSeA5)

35 Maybe if I ran the emails through a pdfmaker with a watermark that reads TOP SECRET, the NY Times would publish them. Posted by: Jean

You would have had to tease them as "SECRET OIL COMPANY EMAIL" for the MSM to be interested. Which is somewhat correct since the current email show Shell Oil participating with the Hockey team in propaganda.

Had this leak been from an oil company trying to derail the AGW research - front fucking page for a week.

Posted by: Iskandar at December 06, 2009 08:03 PM (u1pln)

36 Isk - it is tempting to create a file of email exchanges between the Chamber of Commerce and Richard Scaife about sabotaging Copenhagen, post it up on a 4chan type irc channel and see how much of MSM runs with it without doing even cursory fact checking.

Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2009 08:08 PM (xCBQ4)

37 Had this leak been from an oil company trying to derail the AGW research - front fucking page for a week an entire election cycle.

Posted by: Iskandar at December 07, 2009 12:03 AM (u1pln)

FTFY 

Posted by: In Exile at December 06, 2009 08:12 PM (Dw6L6)

38 it is tempting to create a file of email exchanges between the Chamber of Commerce and Richard Scaife about sabotaging Copenhagen Posted by: Jean

I'd suggest making up a fictitious commerce group that sounds right-wing instead. The real CC wasn't happy about that last prank pulled at their expense.

Posted by: Iskandar at December 06, 2009 08:13 PM (u1pln)

39 Nice little news network ya got here, Andy. It'd be a shame if anything were to happen to it.

Posted by: eman at December 06, 2009 08:13 PM (B+7+o)

40

Looks like the CRU hacks are out of Tomsk, Russia.

Babs Boxer wants the culprits arrested.

Looks like the left wing crowd was outed by Russia. Can't make this stuff up.

LMAO.

Posted by: chicocano at December 06, 2009 08:19 PM (2n5cq)

41 eman - notice Schlesinger is from Illinois, and the note was sent to the whole list - not to the NYSlimes guy directly.  Sounds less like a warning and more like an initial salvo.

Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2009 08:19 PM (xCBQ4)

42

What would it take to end the careers of some of these "scientists"?

I'm thinking rule 13 (or is it 12) would have some use here.

"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."

as well as: "Does the end justify the means?" is meaningless as it stands: the real and only question regarding the ethics of means and ends is, and always has been, "Does this particular end justify this particular means?"

Yeah Saul, your chickens are coming home for some loving.

Posted by: Jim in San Diego at December 06, 2009 08:23 PM (H7Rlw)

43 Jean, yes indeed. Trillions are at stake.

Posted by: eman at December 06, 2009 08:24 PM (B+7+o)

44 Posted by: motionview at December 06, 2009 11:51 PM (KgG1I)

I'm not surprised at this. Most newspapers have stuff like that in the can months ahead of time. With budgets the way they are they don't have a spare dime to redo anything. It was given a go ahead and a pup date and no one has looked at it since.

Posted by: Rocks at December 06, 2009 08:27 PM (ToM4s)

45

Once again I have been  FUCKED by the web goddess, with his/her stupid "annoying" response obliterating my post.

WTF?????

It's obvious that ACE or someone running this site is bending the poorly-skilled webbuttperson over a fence rail every night  and taking aim at (what must by now be) a well-worn anus --- how else to explain the Fourth World Quality of this website?

How else to explain the obvious passive-aggressiveness of the sex slave shtuppee than his/her retaliation for a chronically inflamed rectum?

When ACE is bleating about ad revenues, just remember: Better REVENUE GENERATING sites have been created in the cybercafes of Lagos, Nigeria.

They, at least, don't go out of their way to piss you off.

So the next time you write about dipping your balls, Ace, just remember:  a lot of us out here hope you will immerse them in molten sodium.

En Fuego!!!!

 

 

 

 

Posted by: effinayright at December 06, 2009 08:32 PM (iGCez)

46 what happened? A lot of posts that don't go through can be recovered by just paging back. Not all of them, but a lot.

Posted by: ace at December 06, 2009 08:34 PM (jlvw3)

47 Copenhagen prostitutes?

Climate prostitutes?

Shame on you for this gutter reportage. [Emphasis added.]

"Reportage"? Wait until this guys learns that the only other person who really likes that word is O'Reilly. That'll drive him more nuts than he already is.

The vibe that I am getting from here, there and everywhere is that your reportage is very worrisome to most climate scientists.

This is like ... amazing. Going after reporters. Man, these guys are really full of themselves, and exceedingly desperate. I'm not sure how anyone can hide that. The vibe I'm getting is that Schlesinger is more worrisome to climate scientologists.

But, I sense that you are about to experience the 'Big Cutoff' from those of us who believe we can no longer trust you, me included. [Emphasis added.]

They're going to circumsize him? That's not right.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at December 06, 2009 08:43 PM (A46hP)

48 Keep at it, Ace.  Your climate posts are really top shelf.

Posted by: Amused Observer at December 06, 2009 08:47 PM (Uy/AI)

49

Who can the US send to Copenhagen to plug the holes in the dikes?

Nevermind.

Posted by: Buffalobob at December 06, 2009 08:54 PM (ae0kj)

50

The man's disengenuousness is without measure:

http://tinyurl.com/ybe3nth

 

 

 

 

Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 06, 2009 08:56 PM (xIqkW)

51 Dudes, I so had everyone scooped on the Daily Mail story.

And who is "Pielkes"?

Posted by: logprof at December 06, 2009 08:58 PM (I3Udb)

52 And who is "Pielkes"? Posted by: logprof

As in the Pielkes, father and son researchers and partial skeptics (IE: they believe there is warming and some of it is caused by man but the current science is severely lacking, IIRC).

Jr.
Senior

Posted by: Dr. at December 06, 2009 09:06 PM (u1pln)

53 Perhaps, if Rivkin experiences 'The Big Cutoff', he might begin to do actual 'reportage' that gets to the heart of the matter. One thing I learned from The Godfather: keep your friends close, and your enemies closer. This inane action threatens to distance a potential enemy. Dumb move IMO.

Posted by: Kevin in ABQ at December 06, 2009 09:09 PM (/RwSS)

54 Perhaps, if Rivkin experiences 'The Big Cutoff', he might begin to do actual 'reportage' that gets to the heart of the matter. Posted by: Kevin in ABQ

What?! And give up all those cocktail party invites? Surely you jest, man.

Posted by: Iskandar at December 06, 2009 09:18 PM (u1pln)

55 The American Thinker piece is pretty good.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at December 06, 2009 09:29 PM (muUqs)

56 All The News That's Fit To Print That Fits The Agenda (and makes us all RICH!)

Posted by: Rewrite! at December 06, 2009 09:33 PM (d7Px0)

57 ...and yet the AP continues to post scientific-proof (opinions) articles with No Mention of the glaring fraud.

Posted by: Rewrite! at December 06, 2009 09:35 PM (d7Px0)

58

THIS IS THE SIXTH TIME TODAY THAT I'VE HAD TO REPEAT: ALGORE USES PIGTAIL LIGHTBULBS IN HIS MANSION!!!

Thank you!

Posted by: Charles at December 06, 2009 09:36 PM (d7Px0)

59 By the way, the big cutoff is the we won't publish you cutoff; not the journalist cutoff

Posted by: ParisParamus at December 06, 2009 09:45 PM (cd0d9)

60 Ah, you just gotta love the detached cool scientific tone ofthe e-mail.

Posted by: logprof at December 06, 2009 09:47 PM (I3Udb)

61 Yves Saint Laurent Sandals

Posted by: Yves Saint Laurent Sandals at December 07, 2009 02:02 AM (QN9Ge)

--Oh fuck off!

You need laptop-battery

Posted by: Laptop Battery at December 06, 2009 10:13 PM (I3Udb)

62 Climate hookers for free. O to be in Gropenhagen.

Posted by: chicocano at December 06, 2009 11:19 PM (2n5cq)

63

I followed the links to  Roger Pielke's blog and comments on the Schlesinger email. Wow, they are all a bunch of leftards. Pielke's gripe is that the science is setteled but policy is not. So, the AGW are only getting sidetracked by defending the science.   And he's one of the more reasonable ones.

It is scary that they think that scientists have the right to become our dictators. The fact that they want to destroy our economy to further third world nations is ridiculous. We are supposed to dip into our own pockets and hand it over to countries that are the antithesis of America.  I suspect that if we do so, we are funding our own future destruction by terrorists.

The Green Turd went after Breitbart for calling a Hansen a traitor but he is exactly right.

Posted by: moi at December 06, 2009 11:29 PM (7FgWm)

64 Threaten a guy who willingly sucks your dick 99% of the time?  Yea, Michael, you go with that.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 07, 2009 12:03 AM (PbfKK)

65 So this guy's problem wasn't that hookers were degrading themselves into practicing their craft for free, nor that conference-goers were taking them up on it... it was that it got reported.  Interesting.

Posted by: Tom in Korea at December 07, 2009 01:59 AM (nS7nk)

66 If so, we ow the Russians an dept... Thank you, former commie bastards....

Posted by: TheGarbone at December 07, 2009 02:36 AM (DpCj+)

67 Andy is trying to slowly pull himself away from the climate cartel's tit - http://ow.ly/JtyC

Posted by: DM! at December 07, 2009 03:34 AM (UiMay)

68 You can send your greetings to Copenhagen here:

http://en.cop15.dk/climate+greetings

Posted by: AE at December 07, 2009 03:40 AM (kSfPT)

69 Sounds like Schlesinger could use some pro-bono bimbos.  Did global warming put that stick up his ass?

Posted by: nickless at December 07, 2009 03:45 AM (MMC8r)

70 The piece LauraW. linked earlier exposes a whole new area of shenanigans, too.

Gabriel did dat, not me.

Posted by: lauraw at December 07, 2009 03:56 AM (DbybK)

71 #71 LOL.  Someone should set up a faux-Copenhagen greetings page with real comments; not the Its a Hot World Afterall ones flashing on that site

Posted by: ParisParamus at December 07, 2009 04:01 AM (cd0d9)

72 Its a Hot World Afterall sounds like a Southpark Cartoon premise, n'est pas?

Posted by: ParisParamus at December 07, 2009 04:03 AM (cd0d9)

73 Why does this sound like dialogue from "Public Enemies" or "Goodfellas"?


Copenhagen prostitutes? Unbelievable and unacceptable. What are you doing... and why do you think I'm funny? Funny how? You mean funny like I'm a clown? I amuse you? I make you laugh?

Posted by: gjz at December 07, 2009 04:14 AM (GdqSP)

Posted by: nickless at December 07, 2009 04:25 AM (MMC8r)

75 The Tablet is a Catholic newspaper covering Brooklyn and Queens in New York City.  Whilst it tries to be reverent and holy, it so desperately wants to just be a liberal newspaper as much as possible.

One of this week's two frontpage stories:  The Poor To Be Most Hurt If Nation's Refuse to Address Climate Change.

*sigh*

Not a word about Climategate, nor a hint of skepticism, just earnest assertions that we have to do something, now, or the poor are going to be hurt.

By climate change.

I love my church, but she is gullible.  Naive and gullible, just like her Obama-voting members who love the idea of government-run healthcare just so long as abortions aren't covered (promise!).

Name any liberal foolishness outside of abortion, and the Catholic Church is desperate to run with it, muddy-headed, as though there is no need to think once someone says "social justice."

Posted by: Kensington at December 07, 2009 05:00 AM (BlBnA)

76

The newspaper promotions on environmentalism must have been a coordinated effort--the WSJ (WSJ!) devoted an entire section to this fraud, complete with a section on how AGW supporters can refute skeptics.

Bjorn Lomborg must have seen this coming--he penned an article about the snows of Kiliminjaro, and how they've been retreating...since 1890 at least.  In the meantime, people who live in the vicinity of Kiliminjaro are contending with more immediate issues such as HIV.    

Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at December 07, 2009 05:27 AM (DPM1U)

77

Someone prominent needs to kill the meme that this was a hack -- it was a leak by a whistleblower.

No, no one who's prominent needs to engauge the left on their red herring. It's a distraction.

The debate isn't about how the emails became public.

Posted by: Entropy at December 07, 2009 05:54 AM (IsLT6)

78 THE NUMBER FOR MICHAEL SCHLESINGER IS 217-333-2192.  CALL HIM AND LEAVE A MESSAGE.

Posted by: Tim at December 07, 2009 06:03 AM (RHi8Y)

79 THE NUMBER FOR U. OF ILL PRESIDENT IS 217-333-3070- CALL TO LET THEM THINK WHAT YOU ABOUT THIS.

Posted by: Tim at December 07, 2009 06:15 AM (RHi8Y)

80 The Today Show this morning.

"And now to Copenhagen where the climate change summit opens today.  Our reporter on site has the story..."
-3 minutes-
"Now the Tiger Woods events."

NBC is on board with "hiding the decline".

Wouldn't the Russians love a global climate change bureaucracy?  It's the perfect outlet to infiltrate to develop key streams of information in all the developing world.  What else does Russia have but not an abundance of nuclear scientists looking for work?

Posted by: WTFCI at December 07, 2009 06:17 AM (GtYrq)

81

If you want to dial my old dorm room at the U of I, call 217-332-1412.  Ask for "Nude and Lubed Illini."

Maybe old Prof Walsh as the Atmos Sciences department could straighten Schlesinger out.  I had Walsh for a meteorology class back in 1990--he was a cool, very intelligent guy, and a former AF airman.    

Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at December 07, 2009 06:33 AM (DPM1U)

82 Ace, what is the next truth you will denounce in order to defend your stupid ideology?

The world has passed you by. Once again.

It must suck to watch your worldview stomped on every day.

Posted by: Copernicus at December 07, 2009 06:45 AM (u6zet)

83 And once again, erg's got nothing.

Posted by: OregonMuse at December 07, 2009 07:44 AM (tClfg)

84 The newspaper promotions on environmentalism must have been a coordinated effort--the WSJ (WSJ!) devoted an entire section to this fraud, complete with a section on how AGW supporters can refute skeptics.

Yeah. My morning read nearly made me throw up.  I threw the section at my husband and said  "here's your daily dose of propaganda- courtesy of the WSJ".
I was disgusted.  Only the editorial page and Henninger, Stevens and Strassel are shedding any light on the issue.  And thank God for that, I guess. They have indeed covered it with the proper outrage, imo.   And then, this. Gah!

Posted by: Derak at December 07, 2009 07:53 AM (j9cGY)

85 No shame whatsoever. Amazing.

Posted by: RoboMonkey at December 09, 2009 06:42 AM (mdDbk)

Posted by: sdf at May 16, 2010 05:57 AM (16a7M)

88 Winpromote solutions creates and produces custom printed logo promotion items and <a href=http://www.winpromote.com/category/ >promotional products</a>, imprinted corporate gifts, tradeshow giveaways, promotion merchandise, advertising specialties, corporate gifts, and a wide variety of <a href=http://www.winpromote.com/hot-products/1.html >promotional novelty</a>.

Posted by: custom promotional prodcuts at June 02, 2010 11:32 PM (mYNod)

89 Thanks for the info, nice post!

Penny stock investment  Burn fat build muscle

Posted by: kasey t at October 04, 2010 08:25 PM (Gk1Ss)

90 I really like this website, and hope you will write more, thanks a lot for your information.
 

Posted by: handbags outlet at November 25, 2010 05:43 PM (Hey5i)

91 I tried to think so, but i found it was not as the same in the actual process. As you mentioned, I still have doubts, but really thank you for sharing!

Posted by: vacuum forming machine at December 19, 2010 10:44 PM (Ij6uU)

92 Classic exposition, I have also mentioned it in my blog article. But it is a pity that almost no frienddiscussed it with me. I am very happy to see your article.

Posted by: hookah at December 19, 2010 10:46 PM (Ij6uU)

93 I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along.I thought I would leave myfirst comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading.Nice blog.I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Posted by: slitting machine at December 19, 2010 10:47 PM (Ij6uU)

94 I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
more here http://www.china-metaldome.com/, http://www.flexiblecircuitpcb.com/

Posted by: flexible pcb at January 04, 2011 05:41 PM (4e169)

95 Thanks for posting! I really enjoyed the report. IÂ’ve already bookmark this article.

Posted by: chi flat iron at April 29, 2011 11:17 PM (pqt+L)

96 You have given us some interesting points . This is a wonderful article and surely worth reading.Excellent point here. I wish there are more and more articles like that alexander wang bag. Bright idea, hope there can be more useful articles . This article is definitely eye-opening and inspiring. I appreciate your bright ideas in this alexander wang rocco article.Great work! This article is definitely eye-opening and inspiring.Your do have some unique ideas here and I expect more bifocal eyeglasses articles from you. http://www.alexander-wang-handbag.com

Posted by: alexander wang at July 02, 2011 09:16 AM (/abOg)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
119kb generated in CPU 0.0724, elapsed 0.3069 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2647 seconds, 224 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.