December 18, 2009

The Guns Go Silent: Milbloggers Silently Protest Military's Increasing Hostility to Blogging
— Ace

The silence actually began on Wednesday but continues through today.

Double-Post: Damn, Drew hit this a day or three ago. Should have known. Eh, the additional exposure can't hurt.

Almost all the milblogs are going radio-silent to protest the treatment of CJ at A Soldier's Perspective.

On Wednesday 16 December 2009, many milblogs — including This Ain't Hell, From My Position, Blackfive, Miss Ladybug, Boston Maggie, Grim's Hall, and those participating in the Wednesday Hero program — are going silent for the day. Some are choosing to go silent for a longer period of time.

The reason for this is two-fold. First, milblogs are facing an increasingly hostile environment from within the military. While senior leadership has embraced blogging and social media, many field grade officers and senior NCOs do not embrace the concept. From general apathy in not wanting to deal with the issue to outright hositility to it, many commands are not only failing to support such activities, but are aggressively acting against active duty milbloggers, milspouses, and others. The number of such incidents appears to be growing, with milbloggers receiving reprimands, verbal and written, not only for their activities but those of spouses and supporters.

The catalyst has been the treatment of milblogger C.J. Grisham of A Soldier's Perspective (http://www.soldiersperspective.us/). C.J. has earned accolades and respect, from the White House on down for his honest, and sometimes blunt, discussion of issues — particularly PTSD. In the last few months, C.J. has seen an issue with a local school taken to his command who failed to back him, and has even seen his effort to deal with PTSD, and lead his men in same by example, used against him as a part of this. Ultimately, C.J. has had to sell his blog to help raise funds for his defense in this matter.

An excellent story on the situation with C.J. can be found at Military Times: http://www.armytimes.com/offduty/technology/offduty_blogger_120809/ While there have been new developments, the core problem remains, and C.J. is having to raise funds to cover legal expenses to protect both his good name and his career.



One need only look at the number of blogs by active duty military in combat zones and compare it to just a few years ago to see the chilling effect that is taking place.

Milblogs have been a vital link in getting accurate news and information about the military, and military operations, to the public. They have provided vital context and analysis on issues critical to operations and to the informed electorate critical to the Republic.

On Wednesday 16 December, readers will have the chance to imagine a world without milblogs, and to do something about it. Those participating are urging their readers to contact their elected representatives in Congress, and to let their opinions be known to them and to other leaders in Washington.


Some milblogs will remain silent for several days; some just for the day. All have agreed to keep the post about the silence and C.J. at the top of their blogs until Friday 18 December. The issues go beyond C.J., and deserve careful consideration and discussion. We hope that you will cover this event, and explore the issues that lie at the heart of the matter. Contact the milbloggers in your area or that you know, and hear the story that lies within.

I'm not sure what you can do to help. Donations, certainly. And less costly -- hit the link, check out the blogs engaging in the protest, make sure you give them a click.


Posted by: Ace at 08:22 AM | Comments (39)
Post contains 614 words, total size 4 kb.

1 I smell Unicorn poop.

Posted by: eman at December 18, 2009 08:30 AM (yf/JJ)

2 Very disturbing in many respects. Go after the Military bloggers but don't offend a muslim shrink who may be psycho? Go figure. And personally I've always wondered if I have said to much about my current military service to be to recognizeable.

Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:31 AM (0GFWk)

3
Nobody should be blogging from a combat or operational area.  End of story.

Posted by: Dang Straights at December 18, 2009 08:31 AM (Haq+B)

4 Nobody should be blogging from a combat or operational area.  End of story.

Bullshit.

Posted by: Hatchet Five at December 18, 2009 08:33 AM (aNLk0)

5 Nobody should be blogging from a combat or operational area. End of story. Posted by: Dang Straights at December 18, 2009 12:31 PM (Haq+B) How do you define "operational" area?

Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:33 AM (0GFWk)

6 Funny how this magically coincides with The Vapid One™ becoming CIC.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 18, 2009 08:33 AM (ZGhSv)

7 I'm starting to wonder about a U.S. military coup brewing...

Posted by: St. Agnostic at December 18, 2009 08:33 AM (gbCNS)

8 Funny how this magically coincides with The Vapid One™ becoming CIC. Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 18, 2009 12:33 PM (ZGhSv) Actually I don't think that is it. The Military really doesn't move that fast on this kind of policy

Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:34 AM (0GFWk)

9 I'm starting to wonder about a U.S. military coup brewing... Posted by: St. Agnostic at December 18, 2009 12:33 PM (gbCNS) No chance No how No way. And Ace said yesterday he really doesn't want that here.

Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:36 AM (0GFWk)

10
What is 'operational' these days?  The deployment center up at Hood?  (kim mundley might still lose her leg, btw)

Troops aren't journalists, and they damn sure aren't civilians.  It doesn't matter how shitty the administration is, blogging isn't part of the mission.  Every letter sent home in previous conflicts was censored by an officer, but we're supposed to allow milblogs to be updated willy nilly?

Posted by: Dang Straights at December 18, 2009 08:39 AM (Haq+B)

11 No chance No how No way. And Ace said yesterday he really doesn't want that here.

Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 12:36 PM (0GFWk)

You're right. I will simply wonder silently.

Posted by: St. Agnostic at December 18, 2009 08:39 AM (gbCNS)

12
And no, it ain't fair and it ain't right.  Welcome to the military.

Posted by: Dang Straights at December 18, 2009 08:41 AM (Haq+B)

13 Dang, I hear what you are saying and it does make sense, but if this is a genuine military issue, why not have a blanket policy, an order from up high? The case by case nature of it makes it seem petty and stupid.

Posted by: eman at December 18, 2009 08:42 AM (yf/JJ)

14 Every letter sent home in previous conflicts was censored by an officer, but we're supposed to allow milblogs to be updated willy nilly? Posted by: Dang Straights at December 18, 2009 12:39 PM (Haq+B) There is no doubt that Military personal should be very circumspect as what they say especially when they are in Uniform or percieved to be in Uniform.And of course National Security always has to come first. And there in no doubt that Military personal do not have all the rights of a civilian.

Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:44 AM (0GFWk)

15 I know that the U.S. Military has far more respect for the Constitution than the current administration.

Posted by: Mike H at December 18, 2009 08:44 AM (LdYLm)

16 The case by case nature of it makes it seem petty and stupid. Posted by: eman at December 18, 2009 12:42 PM (yf/JJ) It might come to that, but in stuff like this the Military moves rather slowly sometimes.

Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:46 AM (0GFWk)

17 Dang, I suspect that the new hostility towards milblogging has less to do with comsec than with some self-serving mid-level officers trying to ensure that they stay promotable.

As awesome and dedicated as our military is, they're still human beings with the same weaknesses as the population at large. Careerist officers will always exist, and they sometimes do some really smarmy shit.


Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 18, 2009 08:49 AM (l1Wlr)

18

Imo, the pricks took their lead from Casey when he showed that it's no longer the corps, it's political. 

It's always the same, when the soldiers step out front, the military shines when the soldiers are shunted to the back and displaced by the political types, starved for face time, the military sucks.  And the bad thing is that it is easy to take down and harder than hell to build back up.

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 18, 2009 08:52 AM (r1h5M)

19 Is there a specific military regulation regarding censoring letters to home? If there is one, the military needs to pencil in some blogging stuff. They should act on this before something truly effed-up happens. Probably won't.

Posted by: eman at December 18, 2009 08:53 AM (yf/JJ)

20

Troops aren't journalists, and they damn sure aren't civilians.  It doesn't matter how shitty the administration is, blogging isn't part of the mission.  Every letter sent home in previous conflicts was censored by an officer, but we're supposed to allow milblogs to be updated willy nilly?

RTFA

They went after him not because he violated any sort of operation security guidelines, but for things like criticising the local school board, who complained.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 18, 2009 08:53 AM (rf03a)

21 Obviously, since the chain of command blows whichever way some unscrupulous pol directs (because we have to keep budgets up, you know), there is a need for an ombudsmen agency for military members (think like the ACLU, but with a military bent).

Posted by: Horatius at December 18, 2009 08:56 AM (WLQ7+)

22 OT..

Our Thug-in-Chief Speaks.  Via  TheHill.com:

“Don’t think we’re not keeping score, brother,” Obama told DeFazio during a closed-door meeting of the House Democratic Caucus, according to members afterward.

Posted by: GregInSeattle at December 18, 2009 08:57 AM (B5cM9)

23 It isn't the blogs that f-up the morale and it isn't the soldiers who cause the complaints, it's the stuff that is happening to the soldiers.  Stopping the complaining won't fix the problem.  Fixing what's broke will.

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 18, 2009 08:58 AM (r1h5M)

24 Yeah, perhaps the military needs to unionize. I mean, not really, but if that is the only way to protect themselves, then that is what is needed. Because the chain seems to not be able to do it.

Posted by: Horatius at December 18, 2009 08:59 AM (WLQ7+)

25 Maybe Ace should offer them all anonymous co-blogger status so that could really take some snarky shots at the One and their institutions.

Posted by: Jean at December 18, 2009 09:01 AM (1bQOq)

26 All other issues aside, is a voluntary 'day of silence' the best way to protest involuntary silencing?  Wouldn't that be like a guy that gets kicked out of a bar protesting by not going to the bar that kicked him out?

Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at December 18, 2009 09:05 AM (+lsX1)

27 Nobody should be blogging from a combat or operational area.  End of story.

Truth.

Posted by: Welding Goggle Salesman at December 18, 2009 09:17 AM (EL+OC)

28 Eff'n sock.

Posted by: Barbarian at December 18, 2009 09:19 AM (EL+OC)

29 For those of us who have been on active duty in a combat zone it is understandable why blogging without any restraint is unacceptable. We all know what it's like to grouse and complain about our plight but when you send that to the people back home it becomes much bigger than it actually is. Imagine a wife or Mom receiving a blog about how badly her husband/son is being treated and how dangerous it is because of some shortage. Then there is the possibility of leaking secret info inadvertently or divulging a location that should be unmentioned. Just like freedom of speech in the military everything has constraints.

Posted by: Inspectorudy at December 18, 2009 09:25 AM (Vo1wX)

30 Imagine a wife or Mom receiving a blog about how badly her husband/son is being treated and how dangerous it is because of some shortage. Then there is the possibility of leaking secret info inadvertently or divulging a location that should be unmentioned. Just like freedom of speech in the military everything has constraints.

You know, my concern in this has always been the little fact that Huntsville, AL is only a combat zone because local politicians declared war on a service member...

As for the point made--the first I really don't care about. It's a Republic, folks back home have a right to know what it going on. The second is obvious, and I agree. Let's apply it to the press with the same stringency.

Posted by: Horatius at December 18, 2009 09:30 AM (WLQ7+)

31 I will never understand why liberals hate the Military that protects them from being torn apart by a team of horses or worse, things never change in this Country, rapists and murderers were treated better than me and my Brothers when we came home from that filthy war in SE Asia!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at December 18, 2009 10:06 AM (OmBSC)

32 This is all straight up communism trying to shutdown free speech by this admin.

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at December 18, 2009 10:14 AM (OmBSC)

33 Odumbass knows that the Military despises him, after the way W treated them and still does honor them!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at December 18, 2009 10:15 AM (OmBSC)

34 Okay, I hope I scared enough people with the "military should unionize" comment. That is an effort that I think actually should proceed forward, for many reasons--all of which I think constructive. This is not to say I think such an effort should actually succeed, just that I think the debate it would create would be illuminating on many different fronts.

On a more positive note (and you will have to excuse the lack of a new paragraph--my ability to do so is post to post, as the toolbar has not loaded), I think an answer to this problem of how to protect the member--when the chain has become too politically saavy or craven--may be an old one--military tribunes, outside the chain of command, who are able to step in and stop the chain when it is railroading personnel. Details are to be argued over, but as a first cut, military tribunes should be veterans, but not 20-year retirees. I want someone not totally in love with the system, but who knows it.

Finally, the idea for a "ACLU for active duty and vets" organization that will support the member when faced with unjust abuses of power (by both the military and local/state/national politicos) is one that is solid, and will be pursued should I ever get a chance. I'm sure such orgs already exist--they just need to be expanded and made much more capable.

Basically, in a nutshell, I think the chain of command (and the GOP) has truckled to the Jack Murthas of the world one too many times, and it may be time for alternative solutions that allow for civilian control--but not civilian abuse--of the military.

Posted by: Horatius at December 18, 2009 10:37 AM (WTgg6)

35 Hey, I figured out how to make paragraphs without the automatic toolbar. I really am computer illiterate at times. It's going to get me into trouble some day.

Along with my overdeveloped sense of vengeance.

Posted by: Horatius at December 18, 2009 10:40 AM (WTgg6)

36

The military needs to balance opsec vs the good PR and accurate news that milblogs provide.  With the exception of the few folks like Michael Yon, the legacy media is actively anti-military and holds our troops in contempt.  Anything to get out the good word is worth some work.  If every letter that came from over seas during WWII was censored, it seems that the military could make the same happen for milblogs.

It seems obvious to me that careerism and PC have formed an unfortunate synergy in our armed forces at this time -- probably as a reflection of our society at large.  Milblogs are a double edged sword, but we need to support them, and do our best to see that they remain a source of opsec friendly news from the front lines.  It can be just as simple as reading them, and commenting if you see something that isn't opsec secure. 

Posted by: bil at December 18, 2009 10:49 AM (ud9U6)

37 Double-Post: Damn, Drew hit this a day or three ago.

Apparently ace needs to start marinating in Drew's intellectual juices. 

Posted by: Y-not at December 18, 2009 11:15 AM (sey23)

38 It seems obvious to me that careerism and PC have formed an unfortunate synergy in our armed forces at this time -- probably as a reflection of our society at large. Milblogs are a double edged sword, but we need to support them, and do our best to see that they remain a source of opsec friendly news from the front lines. It can be just as simple as reading them, and commenting if you see something that isn't opsec secure. Bil, I agree with this to a point: by the time you point out something in the post isn't secure, that post has already been out, and the scum that monitor those sites for info already have it. Horse, barn door... AFN runs myriad opsec commercials (my favorites were Squeakers and Co.) but sadly, many do not conform to opsec rules. People can die when you ignore opsec. I am in no way trying to condone what was done to Grisham-that was horrendous, and was the fault of the school board and some A$$hole brass who didn't defend their soldier. (Which is another good reason for private/homeschool, you seldom have these problems.) But I have had some concerns with milbloggers saying too much. When you join the Forces, you don't entirely give up your freedoms, but you do respect security first, and have to think about whether what you say could hurt/endanger someone else. This sometimes makes for awkward conversations with family and friends, but they simply have to deal with that. If they don't, you have to deal with that. Or get out. It's a hard, thankless job. Most of the people here (actually the majority) get that, and respect the people doing the job. And we thank you for that. But I sure don't want my loved one harmed or killed, because someone got finger happy on their website, and spouted off something they shouldn't have. And I have seen it happen, way too often.

Posted by: mokimoki at December 18, 2009 02:08 PM (IrV7s)

39 Corsets are a gorgeous piece of Sexy Lingerie that help to highlight those sexy curves.

Posted by: billystevens at January 20, 2011 10:12 AM (8gXi+)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
92kb generated in CPU 0.0999, elapsed 0.2783 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2499 seconds, 167 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.