December 18, 2009
— Ace The silence actually began on Wednesday but continues through today.
Double-Post: Damn, Drew hit this a day or three ago. Should have known. Eh, the additional exposure can't hurt.
Almost all the milblogs are going radio-silent to protest the treatment of CJ at A Soldier's Perspective.
On Wednesday 16 December 2009, many milblogs — including This Ain't Hell, From My Position, Blackfive, Miss Ladybug, Boston Maggie, Grim's Hall, and those participating in the Wednesday Hero program — are going silent for the day. Some are choosing to go silent for a longer period of time.The reason for this is two-fold. First, milblogs are facing an increasingly hostile environment from within the military. While senior leadership has embraced blogging and social media, many field grade officers and senior NCOs do not embrace the concept. From general apathy in not wanting to deal with the issue to outright hositility to it, many commands are not only failing to support such activities, but are aggressively acting against active duty milbloggers, milspouses, and others. The number of such incidents appears to be growing, with milbloggers receiving reprimands, verbal and written, not only for their activities but those of spouses and supporters.
The catalyst has been the treatment of milblogger C.J. Grisham of A Soldier's Perspective (http://www.soldiersperspective.us/). C.J. has earned accolades and respect, from the White House on down for his honest, and sometimes blunt, discussion of issues — particularly PTSD. In the last few months, C.J. has seen an issue with a local school taken to his command who failed to back him, and has even seen his effort to deal with PTSD, and lead his men in same by example, used against him as a part of this. Ultimately, C.J. has had to sell his blog to help raise funds for his defense in this matter.
An excellent story on the situation with C.J. can be found at Military Times: http://www.armytimes.com/offduty/technology/offduty_blogger_120809/ While there have been new developments, the core problem remains, and C.J. is having to raise funds to cover legal expenses to protect both his good name and his career.
One need only look at the number of blogs by active duty military in combat zones and compare it to just a few years ago to see the chilling effect that is taking place.Milblogs have been a vital link in getting accurate news and information about the military, and military operations, to the public. They have provided vital context and analysis on issues critical to operations and to the informed electorate critical to the Republic.
On Wednesday 16 December, readers will have the chance to imagine a world without milblogs, and to do something about it. Those participating are urging their readers to contact their elected representatives in Congress, and to let their opinions be known to them and to other leaders in Washington.
Some milblogs will remain silent for several days; some just for the day. All have agreed to keep the post about the silence and C.J. at the top of their blogs until Friday 18 December. The issues go beyond C.J., and deserve careful consideration and discussion. We hope that you will cover this event, and explore the issues that lie at the heart of the matter. Contact the milbloggers in your area or that you know, and hear the story that lies within.
I'm not sure what you can do to help. Donations, certainly. And less costly -- hit the link, check out the blogs engaging in the protest, make sure you give them a click.
Posted by: Ace at
08:22 AM
| Comments (39)
Post contains 614 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:31 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:33 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 18, 2009 08:33 AM (ZGhSv)
Posted by: St. Agnostic at December 18, 2009 08:33 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:34 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:36 AM (0GFWk)
What is 'operational' these days? The deployment center up at Hood? (kim mundley might still lose her leg, btw)
Troops aren't journalists, and they damn sure aren't civilians. It doesn't matter how shitty the administration is, blogging isn't part of the mission. Every letter sent home in previous conflicts was censored by an officer, but we're supposed to allow milblogs to be updated willy nilly?
Posted by: Dang Straights at December 18, 2009 08:39 AM (Haq+B)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 12:36 PM (0GFWk)
You're right. I will simply wonder silently.
Posted by: St. Agnostic at December 18, 2009 08:39 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: eman at December 18, 2009 08:42 AM (yf/JJ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:44 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Mike H at December 18, 2009 08:44 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 18, 2009 08:46 AM (0GFWk)
As awesome and dedicated as our military is, they're still human beings with the same weaknesses as the population at large. Careerist officers will always exist, and they sometimes do some really smarmy shit.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 18, 2009 08:49 AM (l1Wlr)
Imo, the pricks took their lead from Casey when he showed that it's no longer the corps, it's political.
It's always the same, when the soldiers step out front, the military shines when the soldiers are shunted to the back and displaced by the political types, starved for face time, the military sucks. And the bad thing is that it is easy to take down and harder than hell to build back up.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 18, 2009 08:52 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: eman at December 18, 2009 08:53 AM (yf/JJ)
Troops aren't journalists, and they damn sure aren't civilians. It doesn't matter how shitty the administration is, blogging isn't part of the mission. Every letter sent home in previous conflicts was censored by an officer, but we're supposed to allow milblogs to be updated willy nilly?
RTFA
They went after him not because he violated any sort of operation security guidelines, but for things like criticising the local school board, who complained.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 18, 2009 08:53 AM (rf03a)
Posted by: Horatius at December 18, 2009 08:56 AM (WLQ7+)
Our Thug-in-Chief Speaks. Via TheHill.com:
“Don’t think we’re not keeping score, brother,” Obama told DeFazio during a closed-door meeting of the House Democratic Caucus, according to members afterward.
Posted by: GregInSeattle at December 18, 2009 08:57 AM (B5cM9)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 18, 2009 08:58 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Horatius at December 18, 2009 08:59 AM (WLQ7+)
Posted by: Jean at December 18, 2009 09:01 AM (1bQOq)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at December 18, 2009 09:05 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Inspectorudy at December 18, 2009 09:25 AM (Vo1wX)
You know, my concern in this has always been the little fact that Huntsville, AL is only a combat zone because local politicians declared war on a service member...
As for the point made--the first I really don't care about. It's a Republic, folks back home have a right to know what it going on. The second is obvious, and I agree. Let's apply it to the press with the same stringency.
Posted by: Horatius at December 18, 2009 09:30 AM (WLQ7+)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at December 18, 2009 10:06 AM (OmBSC)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at December 18, 2009 10:14 AM (OmBSC)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at December 18, 2009 10:15 AM (OmBSC)
On a more positive note (and you will have to excuse the lack of a new paragraph--my ability to do so is post to post, as the toolbar has not loaded), I think an answer to this problem of how to protect the member--when the chain has become too politically saavy or craven--may be an old one--military tribunes, outside the chain of command, who are able to step in and stop the chain when it is railroading personnel. Details are to be argued over, but as a first cut, military tribunes should be veterans, but not 20-year retirees. I want someone not totally in love with the system, but who knows it.
Finally, the idea for a "ACLU for active duty and vets" organization that will support the member when faced with unjust abuses of power (by both the military and local/state/national politicos) is one that is solid, and will be pursued should I ever get a chance. I'm sure such orgs already exist--they just need to be expanded and made much more capable.
Basically, in a nutshell, I think the chain of command (and the GOP) has truckled to the Jack Murthas of the world one too many times, and it may be time for alternative solutions that allow for civilian control--but not civilian abuse--of the military.
Posted by: Horatius at December 18, 2009 10:37 AM (WTgg6)
Along with my overdeveloped sense of vengeance.
Posted by: Horatius at December 18, 2009 10:40 AM (WTgg6)
The military needs to balance opsec vs the good PR and accurate news that milblogs provide. With the exception of the few folks like Michael Yon, the legacy media is actively anti-military and holds our troops in contempt. Anything to get out the good word is worth some work. If every letter that came from over seas during WWII was censored, it seems that the military could make the same happen for milblogs.
It seems obvious to me that careerism and PC have formed an unfortunate synergy in our armed forces at this time -- probably as a reflection of our society at large. Milblogs are a double edged sword, but we need to support them, and do our best to see that they remain a source of opsec friendly news from the front lines. It can be just as simple as reading them, and commenting if you see something that isn't opsec secure.
Posted by: bil at December 18, 2009 10:49 AM (ud9U6)
Apparently ace needs to start marinating in Drew's intellectual juices.
Posted by: Y-not at December 18, 2009 11:15 AM (sey23)
Posted by: mokimoki at December 18, 2009 02:08 PM (IrV7s)
Posted by: billystevens at January 20, 2011 10:12 AM (8gXi+)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2499 seconds, 167 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: eman at December 18, 2009 08:30 AM (yf/JJ)