December 03, 2009
— Gabriel Malor Evil is not overcome by fleeing from it, Mr. President.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
05:24 AM
| Comments (126)
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
The forum will assemble economists, union heads
Strikes one and two. I also assume Geithner will be there. You're out.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 03, 2009 05:35 AM (B+qrE)
Remember the ozone hole that was going to kill us all, back in the 80s? Well, it's fixed. And now it's contributing to GLOBAL WARMING!!! AAAAIIIEEEEEE!!
You can't make this stuff up. Oh, wait, yes you can.
Posted by: Babs Boxer at December 03, 2009 05:36 AM (ZvKgM)
What worries me the most, though, is that based on the Taliban tactics, it would take only a modicum of coordination of ambushes, car bombs, village reprisals, etc., to force Obama's hand and thereby return the country back to savagery.
Sigh. Maybe the old dude wouldn't have been such a bad pick after all.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 03, 2009 05:36 AM (F+U5/)
Also: What are the odds that six months from now we'll look back at this "summit" as the turning point to better times?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 03, 2009 05:37 AM (B+qrE)
..."I don't think death in and of itself should be a taxable event," said Rep. Dave Camp of Michigan, the top Republican on the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. Camp said he is concerned that the $3.5 million exemption would not be indexed for inflation, meaning more and more estates would be subject to the tax in the future....
..."If you've got a smaller business that's much more service oriented, $3.5 million probably allows you to escape under the line," Patten said. "But if you have any kind of business that requires capital, then this puts your business at risk."
Posted by: Deety at December 03, 2009 05:37 AM (aVzyR)
Except for gummint, every union industry is losing jobs.
Posted by: nickless at December 03, 2009 05:40 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 03, 2009 05:40 AM (NtiET)
Second look at Canada: "This thuggish petro-state is today the greatest obstacle to a deal in Copenhagen."
Posted by: FUBAR at December 03, 2009 05:41 AM (ZvKgM)
But they get to vote (Democrat), at least in Chicago, so it's not exactly taxation without representation...
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 03, 2009 05:41 AM (NtiET)
More from the job creation summit farce
Valerie Jarrett, a senior White House adviser, said the president “feels a sense of urgency” about unemployment and the summit is part of an “ongoing effort to jumpstart the economy and create jobs.” She said other forums would be organized around the country.
And all this sense of urgency has has done is release his inner community organizer.
An analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the stimulus generated between 600,000 and 1.6 million jobs and lowered the nationÂ’s unemployment rate by between 0.3 and 0.9 percentage points, even as that rate rose into double digits.
600k-1.6 million number = bullshit.
Posted by: TheQuietman at December 03, 2009 05:42 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Twinks at December 03, 2009 05:42 AM (LeFbD)
Posted by: MelodicMetal at December 03, 2009 05:43 AM (x4S2a)
stimulus generated between 600,000 and 1.6 million jobs and lowered the nationÂ’s unemployment rate by between 0.3 and 0.9 percentage points
With precision like this, we should hire the CBO to do climate research.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 03, 2009 05:44 AM (B+qrE)
Well, relax. The hype in this article is based on the same sorts of projections that the scary global warming projections are based on. Nobody really knows what will happen when the ozone hole is fully gone.
I'm just appalled at the lack of very basic science knowledge even in this article.
Atmospheric ozone, a chemical consisting of three oxygen molecules,
BZZT it's three oxygen ATOMS you idiot
Man-made chemicals like certain aerosol sprays and refrigerator coolants chemically react with ozone, creating new compounds that don't block out the radiation. While some of those chemicals are also greenhouse gases, their contribution to global warming is insignificant when compared with other greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, methane, and water vapor.
The "new chemicals" consist of, overwhelmingly, oxygen gas. Oxygen gas is not a greenhouse gas. And any hydrocarbon byproducts are chewed up by radiation at that level in the atmosphere, they won't contribute to global warming either.
You would think a guy assigned to report on ozone holes would actually know BASIC chemistry on the ozone decomposition itself. You know, on the level of Wikipedia or something. This guy is an absolute idiot.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 03, 2009 05:45 AM (F+U5/)
Why doesn't the Grauniad columnist simply lobby the British government to go to a total 'green' economy unilaterally? They can show us a total CO2 neutral economy with solid growth and lots of jobs and economic vitality and total Utopian perfection, giving us an example to live by. Why must it be inflicted on all the world at once?
Because it's not about the environment.
Posted by: nickless at December 03, 2009 05:47 AM (MMC8r)
BRUSSELS – America's NATO allies have been strongly supportive of the administration's plans for the war in Afghanistan, President Barack Obama's envoy said Thursday, though some nations won't yet commit to contributing more of their own forces.
Doing nothing is the essence of strong support.
Posted by: TheQuietman at December 03, 2009 05:47 AM (1Jaio)
You would think a guy assigned to report on ozone holes would actually know BASIC chemistry on the ozone decomposition itself.
This is the fundamental reason that the MSM has ignored the Climaquiddick story: "It involves time series statistical analysis."... .... ..... "So does that mean the polar bears will still drown?"
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 03, 2009 05:49 AM (B+qrE)
Once enough people get this truth through their heads, the whole scam falls apart. We're getting closer to the magic number every day.
Posted by: lincolntf at December 03, 2009 05:50 AM (7XkqZ)
I feel sorry for anhedonic losers like Mary--no ability to feel pleasure or delight; no friends or family who can stand to be around them, even at Christmas--but maybe if they weren't nagging scolds determined to make everyone as miserable as they are, their lives would improve.
And y'all thought I was bitter and nasty. *snicker*
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 03, 2009 05:51 AM (NtiET)
I'm sure we will get some craptastic shit sandwich shoved down our throats thought up by union thugs and college professors!!
What a fucking joke! This nimrod has the least amount of private sector experience in his cabinet in the past century and he expects to "stimulate" the economy. Isn't that what the "stimulus" that we had to have RIGHT NOW!!! was supposed to do?
Here's the chart from the American Enterprise Institute
http://blog.american.com/?p=7572
Posted by: Hedgehog at December 03, 2009 05:52 AM (oQIfB)
Democrats as a group often seem to think that the economy is a machine that the government built, and therefore can tinker with -- pulling levers here, pushing buttons there -- to increase efficiency. What they don't seem to understand is that the "economy" isn't some external force or process working on the body politic; it is the body politic. The "economy" is just people doing what people do. The "market" is just folks, buying and selling, trading, making deals. It was obvious even to Adam Smith lo these many years ago, but this simple fact always seems to escape the Democrats. The government does not confer the economy onto the people, and governmental attempts to control it inevitably lead to figurative asphyxiation or starvation (the death of the will to work).
The proper role of the government is to prepare the ground so that the economy may flourish; this means adjusting tax law, tort law, and regulations so that they do not strangle the businessman's motivation for going into business in the first place (i.e., to make money). Once that is done, all you can do is let nature (or the market) go to work.
Posted by: Monty at December 03, 2009 05:52 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2009 05:53 AM (CDUiN)
Oh, is THAT all? Well sure! Anything to ensure my re-election bid! SUMMON THE GRAVY TRAIN!
Posted by: President Present at December 03, 2009 05:53 AM (F+U5/)
Don't worry, tomorrow, right after the unemployment numbers come out, Obama will announce his new plan 10-289 which will solve unemployment forever!
Posted by: Wesley Mooch at December 03, 2009 05:54 AM (auzFg)
Posted by: Old Sailor at December 03, 2009 05:55 AM (/Ft4q)
Posted by: Alex at December 03, 2009 05:56 AM (auzFg)
Remember, Barry's got the thermostat on 81...
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 03, 2009 05:56 AM (NtiET)
Posted by: President B. H. "Karl" Obama at December 03, 2009 05:57 AM (F+U5/)
even the WSJ OP ED is anti Ben this morning
live feed here when it begins, will Dodd be hit by lightning as he acts like Ben is the bad guy?
Posted by: ginaswo/MiM at December 03, 2009 06:00 AM (HmjDq)
There never was a "growing ozone hole". That was just another fraud. There once was a graph of the ozone hole and its size over many decades over on the NASA web site.
After evil freon was banned from our air consditioners and new regulations went into effct causeing the repair of any A/C to cost ten times as much and after all of that what happened over several decades?.........
Nothing, the size of the hole never changed. That got noticied and people started talking about it.
NASA took the graph down.
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2009 06:01 AM (CDUiN)
Mark Hess, public affairs director, Goddard Space Flight Center, GISS laboratory, in today's Washington Times:
“…unfamiliar with the British controversy and couldn't say whether NASA was susceptible to the same challenges to its data”
Does NASA keep it’s public affairs director in a cave, or is he one of those “I’m well informed I read the whole NY Times every day intellectualoids”? Or am I just repeating myself?
Posted by: motionview at December 03, 2009 06:03 AM (DtSf1)
Remember the ozone hole that was going to kill us all, back in the 80s? Well, it's fixed. And now it's contributing to GLOBAL WARMING!!! AAAAIIIEEEEEE!!
Jeez, I thought you were kidding. At least some of the commenters are calling out the popsci jackass.
Posted by: Dang Straights at December 03, 2009 06:04 AM (Haq+B)
There once was a graph of the ozone hole and its size over many decades over on the NASA web site.
It was always there.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 03, 2009 06:05 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: P. Harvey Six Feet Down at December 03, 2009 06:06 AM (8WOM0)
Obama is Retarded. A General the HE APPOINTED says look you NEED at least 40K troops. 80K is better but you need 40K. So what does Mr. "compromise" do? Sends 30K troops, and starts to bring them back just before 2012 elections.
I mean this sincerely and not as snark: There is plenty of evidence (57 states, 10,000 killed in the tornado, etc.) of the kenyan princess' innumeracy, and it is possible that he thinks that 30k splits the difference between 40k and 80k.
In my first job, I worked with a person who had great difficulty associating numbers with things in the real world. This person was disciplined enough to be able to do arithmetic and get through life by working through things methodically but could not quickly picture the difference between a dozen and a million.
Now, imagine that same mental handicap in a slacker piece of shit who thinks of himself as the smartest guy ever to walk the earth. Is it such a stretch to think this retard puts 30k between 40k and 80k?
Posted by: MikeO at December 03, 2009 06:07 AM (Ce+tv)
Does NASA keep itÂ’s public affairs director in a cave...
Reminder: This is the agency that created a sizable crater on Mars because they didn't know which (TWO not a hundred) standards of measurement to use.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 03, 2009 06:07 AM (B+qrE)
NASA has already been forced to eat their data once by McEntyre. That is after he somehow got some of their data and started reporting errors.
NASA had refused to release their calculations by McEntyre back fit some of their stuff and said it did not add up. After that NASA said yes there were errors and blamed it on a Y2K fix.
Coincidentally they had been on the same "hottest" decade ever meme with the other warmies and had to retract that. NOAA continues to use the PiltdownMann cherry-picked data and push that same meme.
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2009 06:10 AM (CDUiN)
Now, imagine that same mental handicap in a slacker piece of shit who thinks of himself as the smartest guy ever to walk the earth. Is it such a stretch to think this retard puts 30k between 40k and 80k?
His press secretary once said $100 million is a lot of money and days later said that $800 billion was not a lot of money. So maybe you are on to something.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 03, 2009 06:10 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: chemjeff at December 03, 2009 06:11 AM (F+U5/)
Yep, but the last time I checked it was gone. Perhaps they have had time to "doctor" it and put it back up.
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2009 06:11 AM (CDUiN)
I didn't say there wasn't a hole. What the long term trend showed was that there was no change in the size before AND after the Freon ban.
The long term trend was a constant oscillation with the passing of seasons. If you drew a line through the oscillation there was no change in the overall trend.
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2009 06:14 AM (CDUiN)
They look like children's vitamins (hi, I'm a middle-aged square with no party drug experience...). I'm surprised no one started marketing Obama children's vitamins last year during the Obama's-face-on-everything craze. Why do I only have these beautiful capitalist-pig profit-grubbing ideas after the fads die?!?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 03, 2009 06:15 AM (NtiET)
Second look at Canada: "This thuggish petro-state is today the greatest obstacle to a deal in Copenhagen."
Posted by: FUBAR at December 03, 2009 09:41 AM (ZvKgM)
Well...that's not something you see everyday -- Canada described as a "thuggish petro-state." Even in the context of George Monbiot's usual feverishly demented bullshit, that's a prize specimen of insanity. But I suppose Georgie-poo is feeling a tad stressed out these days, with his little fantasy world collapsing around him and all.
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp, Dicer of Fools at December 03, 2009 06:21 AM (pLTLS)
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12652
$1,256,770.00 paid to keep one woman, the First Lady, in the style of enormous luxury could be used towards helping the troops defeat radical Islamists.
Maybe Moderate-Centrists, along with famous pork-buster and prominent bloggers the Reynolds, Morrisseys, Allahpundits and so many other great FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE-SOCIALLY LIBERAL thinkers can take on this massive pork abuse?
The all-mighty Moderate-Centrist pork-busters did a fabulous job taking down the Republican porkers, when will they get around to taking down the multitude of Democrat-porker-fatter-that Repblicans?
Since Moderate-Centrist call all the shots, what will they do about this?
I do hope it won't be more bitching about social conservatives not supporting gay-marriage or abortion or whatnot..
Posted by: syn at December 03, 2009 06:22 AM (IlCz1)
That's not true either. Before the ban, the minimum amount of ozone followed a nearly linear trend with each year. After the ban, there is only a slight decrease, with the minimum ozone value leveling off. It is true that it's not going up. But there is a substantial difference pre-ban and post-ban. Now you are right if you say that it doesn't PROVE that banning freon caused the change. But we have the additional verification in the lab that reactions of freon & their cousins really do decompose ozone so it lends strong credibility to this claim.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 03, 2009 06:22 AM (F+U5/)
It's a nearly linear DECREASING trend with each year. Sorry for not making that clear.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 03, 2009 06:23 AM (F+U5/)
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 03, 2009 06:23 AM (Be4xl)
@46
From the same Washington Times article...
The White House has dismissed the British e-mails as irrelevant.
"Several thousand scientists have come to the conclusion that climate change is happening. I don't think that's anything that is, quite frankly, among most people, in dispute anymore," press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters this week.
Isn't that just precious?
Posted by: HH at December 03, 2009 06:24 AM (+jvXp)
Sure. Climate is constantly changing. I spent the whole summer looking at rocks carved by glaciers that melted ten thousand years ago...
But just because there is change doesn't mean cars or light bulbs or Christmas is causing it, Gibbs, you clueless catbox nugget.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 03, 2009 06:27 AM (NtiET)
Just your typical, privately funded organization, fight for liberal values and the realities - yes, the realities - of global warming.
*You're sure?! NASA? F--k, I blew that one.*
via Instapundit
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 03, 2009 06:28 AM (RkRxq)
It is. It's amusing to see them go into bunker mentality mode over Climategate. The truth is, they do have a point: even if you throw out all of the CRU data, there is still evidence of global warming elsewhere. The problem is, Climategate really strikes at the heart of the integrity of the climate science profession itself, rather than the data. They don't realize this. They want you to believe "so what if they were trying to 'hide the decline', global warming is still REAL and WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!1111!111!!!" But what they don't realize is that if people no longer have faith in the integrity of the scientists, then they aren't going to be persuaded by these outlandish claims despite what the data say.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 03, 2009 06:28 AM (F+U5/)
Posted by: eman at December 03, 2009 06:32 AM (B+7+o)
I really don't care what it does in the lab. I know what I saw on that graph on the NASA site. IT DID NOT CHANGE.
Do you have a new graph link from someone we can trust???
As for the "evidence" of global warming at other locations all of the high level discussion that I have seen for that say that there has been no global warming for a long time, possibly even longer than the current publicized date of 1998.
The Data that shows global warming from all the major players is currently being refuted as either "chery-picked" proxy data or raw temperature measurements that have been fudged to make it look like we are warming.
There is no warming at the present time.
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2009 06:33 AM (CDUiN)
Evil is not overcome by fleeing from it, Mr. President.
Like teachers telling you to just walk away from the bullies. Remember how well that worked?
Posted by: katya at December 03, 2009 06:39 AM (5bq2g)
Posted by: eman at December 03, 2009 06:40 AM (B+7+o)
@66 Very. Gibbs has apparently un-learned one of the most important lessons of the spokeshole profession - if you really don't know what you are talking about, say so and get out of there. You loose any credibility you may have when you spout such nonsense. I happened to see a clip of Gibbs responding to Jake Tapper on the criticism by Rumsfeld, and rather than saying the obvious - I don't have any specifics to back up the President's speech but they are out there and I will get them (according to Adm Mullen, no dismissed requests under Rumsfeld, one under current Sec Gates), he launches into a ridiculously non-sensical non-answer. At one point Tapper bitingly remarked that Gibbs' answer was "cute".
Amateur hour or evil clowns?
Posted by: motionview at December 03, 2009 06:40 AM (DtSf1)
Making homes more "energy efficient" creates jobs? I hope that none of these evil CEOs took private jets to this job creation sham.
Posted by: TheQuietman at December 03, 2009 09:29 AM (1Jaio)
Yeah, they are paying people to go to your house and check out it's efficiency along with minor fixes. They actually require it if you are applying for state heating aid now. They came to my house. They left a bunch of CFC light bulbs and did an air flow check to look for leaks. Then they put silicone sealant everywhere.
No biggie until I went to open the hatch to my attic. The fucking idiots had sealed my attic shut.
Posted by: Rocks at December 03, 2009 06:46 AM (Q1lie)
No biggie until I went to open the hatch to my attic. The fucking idiots had sealed my attic shut.
You don't need access to your attic, citizen.
Posted by: Dang Straights at December 03, 2009 06:49 AM (Haq+B)
Second look at Canada: "This thuggish petro-state is today the greatest obstacle to a deal in Copenhagen."
O, Canada!
That article damn near brought tears of joy to my eyes.
For the first time in my life, I'm proud of those halfbreed frog snowbillies.
Now ditch the gay maple leaf and bring back the Red Ensign! And change the national anthem to Slayer - Reign in Blood
Posted by: Entropy at December 03, 2009 06:49 AM (IsLT6)
78 / HH:
Actually, I figure 2 safety nets, and 2 clown-cannons. Set at each end of the stadium to facilitate rapid reloading. Gonna make a mint on the tickets.
... ps: I'm outa here. Going to NC for a friends USMC retirement (30 yrs, E-9) back Sunday.
Posted by: Huckleberry at December 03, 2009 06:53 AM (s2bW4)
I don't know what data you are looking at, but I'm looking at this:
http://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/ meteorology/ annual_data.html
(mind the spaces)
If you plot the minimum annual ozone concentration vs. year, you'll see a sharp decline up to around 1988-ish, and then a leveling off with only a slight decline up to the present day.
You get the same general trend if you plot ozone hole size, average annual ozone concentration, etc.
I bring up the laboratory experiments because it's a key distinction between the ozone hole controversy and the global warming nonsense. In the case of the ozone hole, we could replicate the phenomenon quantitatively in the laboratory without having to rely on supposedly predictive models that are extrapolated beyond their level of usefulness. When it comes to global warming, all we have are the models.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 03, 2009 06:56 AM (F+U5/)
No biggie until I went to open the hatch to my attic. The fucking idiots had sealed my attic shut.
Bunch of morons.
I LOL'd too.
Posted by: katya at December 03, 2009 06:57 AM (5bq2g)
Posted by: chemjeff at December 03, 2009 06:59 AM (F+U5/)
Posted by: GreenGasEmissions at December 03, 2009 07:02 AM (ghGK6)
What I was looking at before was an actual trend graph of the hole size over many decades. It did not show a change. That graph disappeared.
Looking at those two tables it doesn't look like the actual size of the hole has changed. (That is without plotting it on a trend line). It continues to oscilate.
In any case, I am not sure I trust NASA anymore after what they pulled with the AGW numbers.
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2009 07:08 AM (CDUiN)
Lawson and Lomborg kick enviro-fundie ass in Toronto AGW debate. [Elizabeth May is the "leader" of Canada's leftist Green Party for those who have never heard her name before. Which, of course, is all of you.]
Posted by: andycanuck at December 03, 2009 07:08 AM (2qU2d)
Posted by: eman at December 03, 2009 07:09 AM (B+7+o)
Posted by: motionview at December 03, 2009 07:10 AM (DtSf1)
We called; up they drove, on a day they are not in our neighborhood, in a full-sized diesel garbage truck. I walked out, handed him the bulb, and off he drove, smoke billowing.
This anecdote is, in essence, the entire Copenhagen enterprise.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 03, 2009 07:14 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 03, 2009 07:15 AM (NtiET)
For the first time in my life, I'm proud of those halfbreed frog snowbillies.
And now you've brought tears to my eyes, Entropy. I luvs youse guys.
BTW, anyone have any more rye? I just finished my breakfast 26er.
Posted by: andycanuck at December 03, 2009 07:22 AM (2qU2d)
my town sent out a letter saying don't put bad CFLs in the trash; call Waste Management and they will come and pick it up. We called; up they drove, on a day they are not in our neighborhood, in a full-sized diesel garbage truck. I walked out, handed him the bulb, and off he drove, smoke billowing. I felt so green. Next time I'll snap a pic, it is really too ridiculous for mere words.
Geez, no wonder the Lefties are so schizophrenic.
Posted by: katya at December 03, 2009 07:23 AM (5bq2g)
#1 The words race car spelled backwards says race car.
#2 Eat is the only word that if you take the 1st letter
and move it to the last, it spells it's past tense,
'ate'.
#3 If you rearrange the letters in 'illegal immigrants',
and add just a few more letters, it spells out: 'Go
home you free-loading, benefit grabbing, kid producing,
violent, non English speaking assholes and take those
other hairy faced, sandal wearing, bomb making, goat
loving, raggedy bastards with you.
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 03, 2009 07:23 AM (xxgag)
What was the history of the hole? Was it recent and never seen before, likely linking it to modern chemicals? Or was it something that came and went overtime, likely disconnecting it from modern chemicals?
I recall Steven Milloy of junkscience.com pointing out that we only became aware of the hole in the ozone layer once our instruments became sensitive enough to detect lower levels of ozone.
So it could have been there for a million years prior and we wouldn't have known about it, because we couldn't analyze atmospheric ozone well enough to know before 1980 (or whatever the date was when detection improved enough to discover the hole) and whether it was normal or not.
Posted by: andycanuck at December 03, 2009 07:27 AM (2qU2d)
#2 Eat is the only word that if you take the 1st letter and move it to the last, it spells it's past tense, 'ate'.
Does "shit" and "hits" not count, sort of?
Posted by: andycanuck at December 03, 2009 07:29 AM (2qU2d)
Go the post at 10:23. Geebus!
Rushbabe, are you talking about the Transflight delay story?
Posted by: katya at December 03, 2009 11:22 AM (5bq2g)
Yeah. Had you heard about this?
Posted by: RushBabe at December 03, 2009 07:31 AM (LKkE8)
Go the post at 10:23. Geebus!
Rushbabe, are you talking about the Transflight delay story?
Posted by: katya at December 03, 2009 11:22 AM (5bq2g)
Yeah. Had you heard about this?
No. Geez, send this to Ace or Gabe or someone. It's ridiculous that our obsession with being friendly and pc is keeping this story quiet.
Posted by: katya at December 03, 2009 07:44 AM (5bq2g)
Jeez, I thought you were kidding. At least some of the commenters are calling out the popsci jackass.
-----------------------
I was kidding, my fellow Morons. I guess my humor is more sub-tell than I thought. But the whole ozone thing reminds me of something that really, seriously pisses me off about liberals. They come up with fucking retarded doomsday crap, and then they feed that crap to school kids. And a lot of school kids worry themselves out of their minds about this stupid, stupid crap.
Which reminds me, the other day I was watching the Disney Channel and fantasizing about getting Hannah all alone in Montana, and they have a commercial for "Disney Green." Urging kids to go to their web site so they can "reg[ister] and pledge." It's fucking shameless, preying on the gullibility fears of kids like that.
I remember worrying about the ozone hole. And the poor Indian crying over all the trash - I believe that "Indian" was from Chicago, surprise, surprise. We were going to be buried in 100 ft. of trash, all over the world. And we were all going to freeze because of global cooling. And get cancer from the ozone hole. But one thing we didn't have to worry about: the Soviets and their nukes. Nope, they were some friendly SOBs, and that damned Ronnie Raygun was trying to start a war.
If there was nothing else, I would irrevocably hate liberals for this kind of crap.
Posted by: FUBAR at December 03, 2009 07:46 AM (ZvKgM)
In the case of the ozone hole, we could replicate the phenomenon quantitatively in the laboratory without having to rely on supposedly predictive models that are extrapolated beyond their level of usefulness
Um... no.
There's theories out there that dispute the anthropogenic element of ozone depletion nonsense. Sure, ozone may have depleted, but that doesn't mean it was CFCs.
One of the big ones, freon... oh yeah, sure. It eats away ozone.
It's also heavier then air and does not float. And the ozone... well she's a fair bit up there. If you change your own freon in your driveway you need to vacate the damn area for 30 minutes cuz the shit will sit there in an invisible cloud and poison you.
Posted by: Entropy at December 03, 2009 08:01 AM (IsLT6)
Second look at Canada: "This thuggish petro-state is today the greatest obstacle to a deal in Copenhagen."
Oh, yah, we're badass, eh.
Posted by: Doug MacKenzie at December 03, 2009 08:18 AM (vtuZz)
And I will agree with you that it cannot be PROVEN, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that the Antarctic ozone hole is/was caused by CFCs. That question cannot be answered by science at all. But the body of evidence is quite overwhelming on this point, and is far, far stronger than any of the AGW evidence that's been presented so far.
And what I mean by "quantitative" is that we could measure in the lab the severity of the problem, i.e., we could state with some certainty that X amount of CFCs are able to decompose Y amount of ozone. Contrast this with the AGW nonsense about 350 ppm CO2 being the "tipping point" of climate armageddon - that number is, more or less, pulled out of thin air, and not based on quantitative laboratory measurement.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 03, 2009 08:56 AM (JgygP)
Posted by: motionview at December 03, 2009 09:20 AM (DtSf1)
Posted by: andycanuck at December 03, 2009 09:20 AM (2qU2d)
Posted by: motionview at December 03, 2009 01:20 PM (DtSf1)
yeah, Phil is defintely the desginated fall guy. Mann is focusing on the emails because he knows that's the only thing which could actually land him in jail.
Posted by: Rocks at December 03, 2009 09:22 AM (Q1lie)
Sorry if this has already been discussed, but does this scare anybody else as much as it does me?
Posted by: Vie at December 03, 2009 09:25 AM (1ZeU1)
Looks like he probably doesn't want to be facing any questions from the public about now. Hmm, I wonder why?
Posted by: Rocks at December 03, 2009 09:29 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2009 09:41 AM (CDUiN)
("I dinnae think he'll listen, lad" -- Eric the Red)
Posted by: Zimriel at December 03, 2009 09:55 AM (9Sbz+)
Valerie Jarrett talks to Meredith Viera about the "Jobs Summit" and mentions all the participants that will be there except for one, industry.
http://is.gd/5brs1
Posted by: WTFCI at December 03, 2009 10:07 AM (GtYrq)
Hillary walks back Obama's `hard' deadline:
“The July 2011 date is the date on which we begin to transfer authority and responsibility to Afghan security forces,” Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, before adding that “the pace, the size of the drawdown, is going to be determined in a responsible manner based on the conditions that exist at the time.”
Emphasizing that the Afghans are to take more and more responsibility for their own security, Mrs. Clinton said, “So it is not contradictory to set a date certain, yet to condition it on the reality that we confront at that time.”
Posted by: AmishDude at December 03, 2009 10:17 AM (ItSLQ)
Posted by: dr kill at December 03, 2009 10:27 AM (KXVFz)
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 03, 2009 12:37 PM (xxgag)
Posted by: lily at October 21, 2010 11:55 PM (1PgjR)
Posted by: Designer handbag at November 16, 2010 12:56 AM (EeEYj)
Happy Columbus Day. Oh, and screw Time Magazine.
Posted by: cheap-emu at December 04, 2010 06:53 PM (JTaTR)
Posted by: esther at December 30, 2010 05:47 AM (yRKLd)
Posted by: tory burch reva at March 22, 2011 07:34 PM (txMcp)
Wow!, <a href="http://www.toryburchoutletonline.com/">tory burch outlet</a> this was a great article. In theory I’d love to write like this as well - taking the time and effort to make a decent article… but what can I say is that I procrastinate a lot and never really seem to get anything done <a rel=”dofollow” href="http://toryburchoutletonline.com/tory-burch-flats-c-15.html">tory burch flats sale</a>
Posted by: tory burch flats sale at April 03, 2011 11:25 PM (eqyfy)
No quello che Reebok EasyTone si sta eseguendo a casa vostra o all'interno del centro commerciale di acquisto, in modo da quando Reebok EasyTone Scarpe si è esteso per il procedere del metodo assolutamente non osso istanze di formazione ottenendo Reebok EasyTone l'immissione di carichi di tensione sui you.so le donne Reebok EasyTone Scarpe è assolutamente buono per noi.
Posted by: Reebok EasyTone at June 17, 2011 02:01 AM (vLXOD)
Posted by: co-cochanel at June 19, 2011 07:23 PM (rWnij)
Posted by: Oakley Sunglasses at June 28, 2011 08:33 PM (Cx36d)
Posted by: qingxiang at July 01, 2011 09:49 PM (pLi3W)
Posted by: Sac Longchamp at July 06, 2011 07:30 PM (82766)
oakley sunglasses
cheap oakley sunglasses
discount oakley sunglasses
Posted by: Oakley Sunglasses at July 06, 2011 09:18 PM (dfVFO)
Posted by: v at July 09, 2011 12:43 AM (neAGm)
Posted by: Hogan Sito Ufficiale at July 11, 2011 09:47 PM (vehtj)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3533 seconds, 254 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Dec. 3 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama will show the limits of his ability to attack unemployment as he hosts a job- creation summit at the White House today.
The forum will assemble economists, union heads and business leaders such as Eric Schmidt, chief executive officer of Mountain View, California-based Google Inc., and Fred Smith of Memphis, Tennessee-based FedEx Corp. With the nationÂ’s unemployment rate at a 23-year high of 10.2 percent, Obama will solicit feedback on job-creation proposals such as incentives to make homes more energy efficient, increased access to financing for small business and tax credits for companies.
Making homes more "energy efficient" creates jobs? I hope that none of these evil CEOs took private jets to this job creation sham.
Posted by: TheQuietman at December 03, 2009 05:29 AM (1Jaio)