April 16, 2014
— Ace Via Instapundit, this Popular Mechanics article notes a recent attempt at opening a pressurized cabin's door.
Nothing happened. The door can't be opened due to the pressure differential. The inside of the plane is pressurized, and the outside is low-pressure; basically you have a thousand pounds of pressure holding the door shut.
Popular Mechanics, however, gets vague about how this works. Airplane doors open outwards. The pressure inside a plane also pushes outwards.
So why does the pressure keep the plane's door shut, rather than giving a would-be door opener a terrific advantage in opening it? Why does pressure fight against a door-opener, rather than fighting for him?
The reason concerns the way that the door is engineered. Some just have locking mechanisms. I suppose those could be opened in flight.
But many are sealed shut by the cabin pressure itself.
These kind of doors are called plug doors, because, like a plug in a sink, they're meant to fill a hole and stay there, sucked into the hole by negative pressure.
Here now some things I learned from Wikipedia and generally scouring the Internet to answer this question, which has long bothered me. (My information is spotty and wholly based on reading so there may be some mistakes here, and I'd appreciate any corrections.)
The inside edge of a plug door is fatter than the outside edge, like a plug that tapers towards its front. The low pressure outside the door hole and the high pressure inside it pushes the plug door into its frame, preventing it from being pulled inwards.
An emergency exit door might just physically come apart from the plane -- that is, it detaches completely. To open it, one has to pull into the body of the plane, then put aside or laid on the floor.
In the video below, note that fatter inside edge of the door, and the thinner outside edge.
In flight, at high altitude, when pressurized, the pressure would be pushing that door outwards into the hole.
Main doors have a tricky hinge, that requires opening it in two stages:
First, the door must be moved inward. Because the door has to be opened inward, it's at this stage that the high pressure of the cabin is helping keeping it sealed shut -- the pressure is pushing the door outward, and a person trying to open it at altitude would have to fight the air pressure to pull it back.
Once it's been moved inward, the hinge now permits it to move outward into the fully open position. Apparently the door can tilt or rotate on the hinge such that it can now move through the door-space, even though it's actually too big for the space. (Much as you can get a couch through a doorway by angling it.)
See? It moves inwards first. If you were trying to open that at 30,000 feet, you'd find it impossible to pull it towards you.
Another kind of door, on the Airbus, achieves this "Bigger on the inside edge" sealing factor by building a door with a top and bottom piece that slide out of the way when a locking mechanism is turned.
You can see that at around twenty seconds in here:
I don't know about that one, though. The true plug type doors just can't be pulled inward (at least not by human strength) at the great pressure differential at high altitude. But the Airbus door appears to open outwards only -- and is only blocked by doing so by the top and bottom pieces of the door, which can be moved aside by mechanical manipulation.
Thus that door seems to be relying only on mechanical safeguards, rather than air pressure, to keep the door shut.
Correction: Airbus actually says its doors open inwards, too. I guess I'm just not seeing the inward motion in that video.
When people say it's impossible to open a door at altitude, I think they're talking about the plug doors.
But not all airplanes have those. (This is unaffected by the correction.)
One more thing about all this: While people will say "You can't open a door in flight," that's not true. Even the plug-type doors can be opened in flight -- just not in flight at high altitudes while the cabin is pressurized.
When there's not such a great difference between the external and internal pressure -- and cabins are only pressurized to about the pressure you'd feel at 8,000 feet -- there won't be anything except the locking mechanisms keeping doors closed.
Of course, it's also not particularly dangerous to open an aircraft door at lower altitude -- no explosive depressurization, no Goldfinger exit -- but it's also not advisable. A sudden change in the airplane's aerodynamic profile can wreak havoc on the pilot's control, and of course no one wants to feel 500 mph hour winds gusting right outside the window.
So there's kind of three myths that need to be busted here: first, the myth that you can just open a door at high altitude and explosively depressurize the cabin.
You can't do that... with plug doors.
But it's actually not true that all airplane doors are plug doors. Some just rely on mechanical safeguards.
And further, the the contrary myth that you can never open a door in flight at all is also wrong.
Up to 8,000 feet, you'd have absolutely no considerations of pressure at all keeping doors shut -- only the mechanical locks would be holding the doors shut -- and I'm going to guess that up to around 15,000 feet, while there would be a pressure differential, it wouldn't be so vast that an adult man couldn't yank it open.*
So... don't be entirely calm when that weird looking guy goes for the door while you're descending for a landing.
And via the Washington Free Beacon, an aircrew does her best stand-up while giving the pre-flight safety instructions.
Listen closely; she packs a lot of jokes in there. Including her advisory that not only are you not permitted to disable the bathroom smoke detector, but that you're also not permitted to disable the bathroom webcam.
* Actually, I bet the handles and such are designed to break off if too much force is exerted on them. That is, if you have to exert such a significant amount of force on the door to pull it open (which would happen in a low pressure outside/high pressure inside situation), the handles are designed to just break off in your hand and leave the door in place.
They could manage that just by using weaker attaching hardware -- plastic screws designed to fail under too much force -- than they otherwise would.
But that's all conjecture.
Posted by: Ace at
02:16 PM
| Comments (233)
Post contains 1152 words, total size 8 kb.
Posted by: Sal at April 16, 2014 02:20 PM (2v393)
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at April 16, 2014 02:21 PM (080XV)
Posted by: johnr@jackgordon.org at April 16, 2014 02:22 PM (lOLTH)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 16, 2014 02:23 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: mallfly at April 16, 2014 02:23 PM (bJm7W)
Posted by: mallfly at April 16, 2014 02:23 PM (bJm7W)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 16, 2014 02:24 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 16, 2014 02:24 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Harry Reid[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 02:24 PM (qKrH5)
Posted by: Stark Dickflüssig at April 16, 2014 02:25 PM (MbqmP)
Posted by: kathysaysso at April 16, 2014 02:26 PM (6H6o8)
Posted by: deadrody at April 16, 2014 02:26 PM (+Dpo7)
Posted by: Stark Dickflüssig at April 16, 2014 02:26 PM (MbqmP)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 16, 2014 02:26 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 16, 2014 02:26 PM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Kensington (@NYKensington) at April 16, 2014 02:27 PM (/AHDz)
Posted by: Sandra ( plug ) Fluke at April 16, 2014 02:28 PM (JyjXt)
Well, thanks to Mullen, the Littoral Combat Ships lack effective armament, so the guy is playing true to type.
Posted by: torquewrench at April 16, 2014 02:28 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: Seems legit at April 16, 2014 02:28 PM (Q6g1g)
Posted by: deadrody at April 16, 2014 02:29 PM (+Dpo7)
Posted by: Buzzion at April 16, 2014 02:29 PM (YmXuG)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 16, 2014 02:29 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: D.B. Cooper at April 16, 2014 02:29 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 02:30 PM (gtjN1)
Posted by: Vic
You do realize that the newer planes no longer have 2 levels of wings, yes?
Posted by: Charles Lindbergh at April 16, 2014 02:30 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: Zakn at April 16, 2014 02:30 PM (7F9i5)
Posted by: Some Twitter Chick With A Plane In Her Cooch at April 16, 2014 02:30 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: BignJames at April 16, 2014 02:30 PM (HtUkt)
Posted by: A Tiny Pilot In A Tiny B777 at April 16, 2014 02:32 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 16, 2014 02:32 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 16, 2014 02:32 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: Tyrion Lannister, Master of Coin at April 16, 2014 02:33 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: MTF at April 16, 2014 02:33 PM (GOoUs)
Posted by: ace at April 16, 2014 02:33 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 16, 2014 02:34 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Zakn at April 16, 2014 02:35 PM (7F9i5)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 16, 2014 02:35 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 16, 2014 02:36 PM (HVff2)
I thought I was quaffing my root beer all alone on the last thread.
Posted by: HR at April 16, 2014 02:36 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at April 16, 2014 02:36 PM (IN7k+)
Posted by: Buzzion at April 16, 2014 02:36 PM (YmXuG)
Oh, and to Eric Cantor. Mickey Kaus outed your little ENLIST scam today. We know you're going to sell us out for a fistful of beans. Again, we know you're lying to us.
Please, all morons, call, just call, Cantor's office and register your disapproval, specifically as it pertains to ENLIST.
Posted by: pep at April 16, 2014 02:36 PM (4nR9/)
Also, there are (almost) no 727s anymore, so no more rear doors.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 16, 2014 06:35 PM (8ZskC)
ahem
Posted by: Sandra Flule at April 16, 2014 02:36 PM (mETGQ)
Posted by: Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan at April 16, 2014 02:37 PM (GOoUs)
Posted by: D.B. Cooper at April 16, 2014 02:37 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Man from Manassas at April 16, 2014 02:37 PM (8MjqI)
Posted by: Zakn at April 16, 2014 02:37 PM (7F9i5)
This reminds me of a funny story about a Mexican buffet I used to frequent and a very friendly bus buy named Sanchez. I think that was his name...
Posted by: Barney Frank at April 16, 2014 02:38 PM (MNq6o)
Bloomberg wants to spend $50M a year to destroy the NRA. Claim is NRA only spends $20M a year.
Still think NRA will win.
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 16, 2014 06:23 PM (ZPrif)
The difference is not the dollars.
It is the 5 million members, who get out and vote. And several million others that may not be members, but vote the same way.
It is the 100 people that show up to a city council meeting.
It is the 500 that show up to a state legislature COMMITTEE meeting.
It is the 5,000 that show up at the capitol for a rally in IL, NY, CT, PA, etc., etc.
It is the people that walk the entire district and hand out literature for a pro-2A candidate or against the gun control candidate.
Posted by: rd at April 16, 2014 02:39 PM (N7QgG)
It could have been worse. We missed the Sarlacc by mere inches.
Posted by: A Tiny Pilot In A Tiny B777 at April 16, 2014 06:32 PM (8ZskC)
That was some low flying.
Posted by: Little Man In The Boat at April 16, 2014 02:39 PM (mETGQ)
If the door is approximately 7 feet tall and 3 feet wide, that's 21 square feet or about 3,000 square inches.
Multiply together to get the amount of force to pull open the door -- 7800 pounds of pull.
That's a VERY healthy adult.
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 16, 2014 02:39 PM (wNF3N)
Posted by: Leland at April 16, 2014 02:40 PM (3R7WS)
Posted by: Al Roker at April 16, 2014 02:40 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Zakn at April 16, 2014 02:41 PM (7F9i5)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at April 16, 2014 02:42 PM (L02KD)
Posted by: D. B. Cooper at April 16, 2014 02:42 PM (1mtKP)
Posted by: Country Singer at April 16, 2014 02:42 PM (sBXOp)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 16, 2014 02:42 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 02:42 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Line. Sand. at April 16, 2014 02:43 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at April 16, 2014 02:43 PM (zT0DN)
The Stew flips a switch and you take 100,000 volts to the hands.
Yeah, we'll taze you bro'.
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 02:43 PM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 16, 2014 02:44 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at April 16, 2014 02:44 PM (l0lja)
So they don't fall down the shaft. Slightly bigger than the hole.
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 02:44 PM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 16, 2014 02:44 PM (/KiIU)
Posted by: mugiwara at April 16, 2014 02:44 PM (3a584)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 16, 2014 02:45 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 16, 2014 02:45 PM (/KiIU)
Posted by: Buzzion at April 16, 2014 02:45 PM (YmXuG)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 16, 2014 02:45 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 06:42 PM (QupBk)
++++
If they were square, they wouldn't fit in the hole.
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at April 16, 2014 02:46 PM (IN7k+)
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 16, 2014 02:46 PM (/KiIU)
Hahaha. Rich megalomaniac narcissistic idiot thinks to change peoples minds you just need a lot of money. Typical limo lib.
Posted by: Dang at April 16, 2014 02:46 PM (MNq6o)
Posted by: ace at April 16, 2014 02:47 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Daniel Bernoulli [/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 16, 2014 02:47 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 16, 2014 02:47 PM (/KiIU)
Posted by: 15 yr old boy at April 16, 2014 02:47 PM (l0lja)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 02:48 PM (gtjN1)
But you can't do that with a circle -- no matter how you orient it, the diameter is always the same.
Well, yeah. When you say it like that. :-)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 02:48 PM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 16, 2014 02:48 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Bernoulli's Principal at April 16, 2014 02:48 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Gran at April 16, 2014 02:49 PM (nPMjI)
Cover my manhole? Never! And I've been told mine's star shaped. But that was quite a while ago...
Posted by: Barney Frank at April 16, 2014 02:49 PM (MNq6o)
Posted by: Northern MN Moron at April 16, 2014 02:49 PM (l0lja)
If NRA were in fact destroyed, and replaced by tougher and more determined successor organizations on gun rights, that would not be unwelcome around these parts.
Former NRA supporter here. I gave up on them after their habit of supporting the likes of Dingy Harry.
The NRA brass splutter and fume and wave their hands and say, "Well, Senator Reid votes our line when asked to."
Yeah, he does that in front of the cameras, and then goes backstage where he works diligently to advance the entire liberal agenda, including gun control, and including packing the federal courts with gun-banning leftist lunatics. Not buying that crap any longer, sorry.
Posted by: torquewrench at April 16, 2014 02:49 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 16, 2014 02:50 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 16, 2014 02:50 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: Zombie W. T. Sherman at April 16, 2014 02:51 PM (8MjqI)
Posted by: Joe "Whiffle Balls" Biden at April 16, 2014 02:51 PM (eAJwE)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at April 16, 2014 02:51 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Death Star Maintenance Unit No. 21334 at April 16, 2014 02:51 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 02:51 PM (gtjN1)
JPFO
Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
http://jpfo.org/
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 02:51 PM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: Sandy Fluke at April 16, 2014 02:52 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 16, 2014 02:52 PM (HVff2)
That's all?
Posted by: Sandy Fluke
They said pull, not suck.
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 02:53 PM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 02:53 PM (QupBk)
Er, guessing? Interestingly enough, your exact dimensions yield the same same square footage, 21 sq. ft or 3,024 sq inches, as my guesstimate.
So what if I haven't actually been on a plane in 10 years.
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at April 16, 2014 02:53 PM (wNF3N)
Posted by: ace at April 16, 2014 02:53 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Gran at April 16, 2014 02:53 PM (nPMjI)
Heh. Ace wins a Platinum Membership to his own club.
Maybe, that way, when he bans himself, he can get back in.........
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 02:54 PM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: Dang at April 16, 2014 02:54 PM (MNq6o)
Posted by: Couch Fucker at April 16, 2014 02:54 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: ace at April 16, 2014 02:55 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Dang
The phone, sillies!
Posted by: Dang at April 16, 2014 02:55 PM (MNq6o)
Posted by: Baldy at April 16, 2014 02:55 PM (2bql3)
Posted by: Zakn at April 16, 2014 02:55 PM (7F9i5)
Posted by: Joe Biden at April 16, 2014 02:56 PM (8ZskC)
More trivia: What am I holding in my hand right now? Better hurry! I'm about to get off!
Posted by: Dang
A pen you Bozos
Posted by: Barackahnaten at April 16, 2014 02:56 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Gollum[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 02:56 PM (gtjN1)
If NRA were in fact destroyed, and replaced by tougher and more determined successor organizations on gun rights, that would not be unwelcome around these parts.
Former NRA supporter here. I gave up on them after their habit of supporting the likes of Dingy Harry.
The NRA brass splutter and fume and wave their hands and say, "Well, Senator Reid votes our line when asked to."
Yeah, he does that in front of the cameras, and then goes backstage where he works diligently to advance the entire liberal agenda, including gun control, and including packing the federal courts with gun-banning leftist lunatics. Not buying that crap any longer, sorry.
Posted by: torquewrench at April 16, 2014 06:49 PM (noWW6)
++++
There was a time when that was a good strategy for the NRA. Back when there used to be Blue Dog Democrats and others who were not anti-gun. The NRA, being a single issue organization, was happy to get support from both sides of the aisle on their one issue.
But, that time is past. The Democrats have become monolithic in worshiping their god of Progressiveness, and they are all bad for gun rights (and all other civil rights, when you get down to it).
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at April 16, 2014 02:56 PM (IN7k+)
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 16, 2014 02:56 PM (/KiIU)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 02:57 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: The Political Hat at April 16, 2014 02:57 PM (CTCNK)
Fox News toured the damage — allegedly caused by the Bureau of Land Management — which included holes in water tanks and destroyed water lines and fences. According to family friends, the bureau’s hired “cowboys” also killed two prize bulls.
<snip>
On a Friday night conference call, BLM officials told reporters that “illegal structures” on Bundy’s ranch — water tanks, water lines and corrals — had to be removed to “restore” the land to its natural state and prevent the rancher from restarting his illegal cattle operation.
Via WZ
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 16, 2014 02:58 PM (wNF3N)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at April 16, 2014 02:58 PM (eAJwE)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 16, 2014 02:58 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Dang at April 16, 2014 02:59 PM (MNq6o)
Posted by: Gran at April 16, 2014 02:59 PM (nPMjI)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 03:00 PM (gtjN1)
Posted by: ace at April 16, 2014 03:00 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Joe Biden at April 16, 2014 03:01 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 16, 2014 03:02 PM (/KiIU)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 03:02 PM (QupBk)
But that makes it so much harder to be the first one.
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at April 16, 2014 03:02 PM (IN7k+)
That's why God gave us 2 liter coke bottles.
Just install piss tubes.
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 03:03 PM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at April 16, 2014 03:03 PM (60Vyp)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 16, 2014 03:03 PM (8MjqI)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 03:04 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Dang at April 16, 2014 03:05 PM (MNq6o)
Posted by: Epobirs at April 16, 2014 03:06 PM (bPxS6)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlinSeattle at April 16, 2014 03:06 PM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: rickl at April 16, 2014 03:06 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Tom Servo at April 16, 2014 03:07 PM (8Fa5Z)
Posted by: Gran at April 16, 2014 03:07 PM (nPMjI)
Posted by: thunderb at April 16, 2014 03:08 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Epobirs
Sucks on a Plane. Ace liked it. I haven't seen it.
Posted by: Dang at April 16, 2014 03:08 PM (MNq6o)
Posted by: Al Bundy at April 16, 2014 03:08 PM (8MjqI)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 03:08 PM (QupBk)
Fascist.
Bossy.
Posted by: rickb223 at April 16, 2014 03:08 PM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 03:09 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlinSeattle at April 16, 2014 03:11 PM (RZ8pf)
It's just a flesh wound.
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 16, 2014 03:11 PM (wNF3N)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 16, 2014 03:12 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Yog-Sothoth at April 16, 2014 03:13 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at April 16, 2014 03:13 PM (60Vyp)
Posted by: Gran at April 16, 2014 03:13 PM (nPMjI)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 03:14 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 16, 2014 03:15 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at April 16, 2014 03:16 PM (60Vyp)
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 16, 2014 03:16 PM (/KiIU)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 16, 2014 03:16 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Is this something? at April 16, 2014 03:16 PM (qQk+U)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 03:17 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Gran at April 16, 2014 03:18 PM (nPMjI)
The lucky ones. Posted by: toby928©
I'd rather enjoy the lengthy fall. Do some flips and spins and stuff. Try to learn how to hover real quick or something.
Posted by: Dang at April 16, 2014 03:18 PM (MNq6o)
Posted by: famous last words at April 16, 2014 03:18 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at April 16, 2014 03:18 PM (hn5v5)
Posted by: Hackers everywhere at April 16, 2014 03:19 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 16, 2014 03:19 PM (8ZskC)
Flap your arms. It couldn't hurt.
Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at April 16, 2014 03:19 PM (hn5v5)
Posted by: Patsy Cline at April 16, 2014 03:20 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 03:20 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 16, 2014 03:21 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: rickl at April 16, 2014 03:21 PM (sdi6R)
Also, test Galileo's theory by comparing your rate of descent to a fat guy's. Posted by: Cicero (@cicero)
If I see a fat guy anywhere near me I'm climbing aboard and riding him into the ground.
Man, that sounded really bad, didn't it?
Posted by: Dang at April 16, 2014 03:21 PM (MNq6o)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 16, 2014 03:21 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 16, 2014 03:21 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 03:22 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 16, 2014 03:23 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: toby928© at April 16, 2014 03:23 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 16, 2014 03:23 PM (8MjqI)
Posted by: pilot141 at April 16, 2014 03:24 PM (nPwzA)
If you are wearing baggy clothes and you're really good a descent rate of only 100 MPH is possible. Aim for some nice soft global warming.
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at April 16, 2014 03:24 PM (L02KD)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 16, 2014 03:24 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 16, 2014 03:25 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 16, 2014 03:26 PM (0HooB)
Then hitting the ground would be a relief.
Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at April 16, 2014 03:28 PM (hn5v5)
>>>> Or if that's not possible, a Prius.
Occupied, of course.
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 16, 2014 03:28 PM (wNF3N)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 16, 2014 03:28 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: John McCain at April 16, 2014 03:28 PM (GOoUs)
Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at April 16, 2014 03:29 PM (uhMMS)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 16, 2014 03:29 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 16, 2014 03:31 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 16, 2014 03:32 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at April 16, 2014 03:33 PM (60Vyp)
Posted by: pilot141 at April 16, 2014 03:34 PM (nPwzA)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 16, 2014 03:35 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 03:37 PM (gtjN1)
Posted by: stace at April 16, 2014 03:40 PM (9PXzx)
Posted by: General Zod at April 16, 2014 03:41 PM (2+bRt)
Posted by: Aviator at April 16, 2014 03:42 PM (3rrMW)
Posted by: tlc, real airline pendant at April 16, 2014 04:14 PM (iViyu)
No need and no room.
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at April 16, 2014 04:14 PM (DL2i+)
Tomorrow at the HQ: "Sunrises- how do they work?"
Posted by: Trucker at April 16, 2014 05:25 PM (Ed+yP)
Here's a page with a handy-dandy table for air pressure at various altitudes. It shows the pressure at 8000 ft (cabin pressure) as 10.9 psia. If the plane is actually flying at 35000 feet (normal), the air pressure outside is 3.46 psia -- giving a difference of 7.44 psi.
Now for the fun part. How big is the door? Let's say, just for fun, that it's six-and-a-half feet high and two-and-a-half feet across. That's 78 inches by 30 inches, or 2340 inches. At a 7.44 psi differential, you'd need about 17,400 pounds of force to open that door.
Posted by: cthulhu at April 16, 2014 05:32 PM (T1005)
Posted by: cthulhu
Bet you tap it with a hammer at the right spot it will open.
Posted by: Burnt Taost at April 16, 2014 05:37 PM (NaeCR)
Actually - they are called 'service holes' now because 'person hole' sounds vulgar.
Posted by: Burnt Taost at April 16, 2014 05:54 PM (NaeCR)
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at April 16, 2014 06:28 PM (oj/2P)
The max pressure differential for high alt transports is 8.5 psi which gives an 8000 ft cabin at 41000 ft, so the load on any door or window is about 8.5 times the sq/in. That means those little plastic side windows have the weight of a Harley and a half pushing on them.
Posted by: Dakota435 at April 16, 2014 06:41 PM (EP1tB)
They aren't so trivial objections. I work with interior configurations for an airline manufacturer. Airlines will spend millions to get an additional 2 seats on an airplane. Why? Because over the life of the airplane it's more profitable. They aren't going to give up 3-4 rows of seats in order to create an additional door and add a lavatory for the pilots only.
Also, some long haul planes carry an entire extra crew. They have a crew rest area that can sleep up to 10 people. They had to stuff that into the ceiling areas above the seats. They can't do that at the front of the airplane.
If the pilots really need to get out of the airplane without going through the passenger cabin, there is a cockpit window that can be opened and an escape ladder they can use.
Posted by: Ken at April 17, 2014 08:34 AM (Xq2WY)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.5799 seconds, 361 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Sandra Fluke at April 16, 2014 02:19 PM (nEIMV)