January 19, 2010
— Dave in Texas Newly elected New Jersey Governor Chris Christie promises to rein in spending, cut taxes and cut the state deficit upon taking the oath of office.
"The era of runaway spending and higher and higher taxes has not worked," he said in prepared remarks. "We have the largest budget deficit per person of any state in the union. We have the highest tax rates in the nation ... Today, a new era of lower taxes and higher growth will begin."
David Paterson meanwhile has been warning New York about an inevitable day of reckoning, citing "mistakes of the past, the squandering of surpluses, the papering over of deficits, the relying on gimmicks to finance unsustainable spending increases has led us to the breaking point," and therefore proposes a budget of $136 billion dollars (a .5% increase), and $1.1 billion of increased taxes and fees like a $465 million excise tax on corn syrup, a buck a pack cigarette tax hike ($210 million), $216 million levies on healthcare providers. And a bunch of other stuff.
Which looks an awful lot like that other stuff he was complaining about.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
10:35 AM
| Comments (116)
Post contains 196 words, total size 1 kb.
Newly elected New Jersey Governor Chris Christie promises to reign in spending, cut taxes and cut the state deficit upon taking the oath of office.
--Not to be overly persnickety, but it's "rein in," not "reign in."
Posted by: logprof at January 19, 2010 10:39 AM (A+6fk)
Where's Patterson from again?
California?
(I know, I know...I'm from California and this all sounds too familiar)
Posted by: Gunslinger at January 19, 2010 10:41 AM (Zi+FQ)
I intend to radically change this to spending like drunken sailors and raising taxes.
Posted by: Gov Paterson at January 19, 2010 10:41 AM (I/MqP)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 19, 2010 10:41 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at January 19, 2010 02:40 PM (WvXvd)
--Yeah, it would suck to have a governor who reigns in spending!
Posted by: logprof at January 19, 2010 10:41 AM (A+6fk)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 19, 2010 10:42 AM (SqAkN)
buck a pack cigarette tax hike ($210 million)
NY already is way up on the Laffer curve for cigarette taxes. Any further increase on cigarette taxes will reduce income from that source.
Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 10:42 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: WTFCI at January 19, 2010 10:43 AM (GtYrq)
Hey kids, check Hillbuzz. the scum on the left are threatening our happy friends on a personal level. They could use our support and help.
Go Brown!
Cuck Foakely!
Posted by: BIG ROB at January 19, 2010 10:43 AM (K2iC2)
like a $465 million excise tax on corn syrup, a buck a pack cigarette tax hike ($210 million),
And they'll be left scratching their heads wondering why in the hell they aren't getting this money, never understanding the law of supply and demand. When you increase the cost of something the demand will drop. Seriously has this ever worked? Then of course remember that its not about balancing the budget but taking any extra money and spending it on new things that they shouldn't.
Posted by: buzzion at January 19, 2010 10:44 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: torabora at January 19, 2010 10:44 AM (b6/rx)
I support the tax on corn syrup. I fucking hate corn syrup. Everywhere else in the world when I buy a Coke, it has sugar in it; here, it's got motherfucking corn syrup.
Plus, aren't the Caribbean countries which sell sugar, like, poor and stuff? Maybe if we bought more sugar they'd be less poor.
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 10:45 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 19, 2010 10:45 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 10:46 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: logprof at January 19, 2010 10:47 AM (A+6fk)
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 10:47 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: BIG ROB at January 19, 2010 02:43 PM (K2iC2)
when they stop sucking up to Hillary and calling Burris the man who will save the union
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 10:48 AM (MxqA5)
Plus, aren't the Caribbean countries which sell sugar, like, poor and stuff? Maybe if we bought more sugar they'd be less poor.
You can thank the Democraps in congress for that. They have a strict quota on sugar imports to "protect Louisinanna sugar growers". It has cause all the candy makers in this country to shut their doors and everyone to switch to fructose corn syrup.
Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 10:49 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 19, 2010 10:49 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 02:45 PM (9Sbz+)
--Precisely. The sugar industry in the USA has such protections from imports that corn syrup is an unfortunate workaround soda manufacturers have adopted. The loss of income to poor countries (like, ahem, Haiti) is the worst affect, but American jobs are lost as well (for example, as of a few years ago Life Savers are no longer made in the USA, but in Canada due to the artificially high cost of sugar).
Posted by: logprof at January 19, 2010 10:49 AM (A+6fk)
Ya know, up it that part of the country ya only gotta drive a little ways to get out of the state to buy a carton of smokes.
I think I'll open a cig shop in New Jersey.
Posted by: Dang at January 19, 2010 10:50 AM (UA4gE)
Posted by: Chapeau du Tinfoil at January 19, 2010 10:51 AM (7BE3R)
Posted by: WTFCI at January 19, 2010 02:43 PM (GtYrq)
--Or you get a black market.
Posted by: logprof at January 19, 2010 10:52 AM (A+6fk)
Christie is the governor who had to endure "fattie" ads when he was running for office.
Bankrolled by the biggest FATCAT in the state: Jon "who moved my hedge fund?" Corzine.
Posted by: kallisto at January 19, 2010 10:52 AM (+FkcS)
Decisions, decisions. Do you want AIDS or arsenic? What a pathetic lot. I suggest she take neither and seek life out of state.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 19, 2010 10:53 AM (hF8Tn)
I'm already boycotting corn and corn products until Nelson changes his vote.
Cigs are going into profitable to smuggle range. Cool.
Posted by: OokOok at January 19, 2010 10:55 AM (dQdrY)
18 Ciggerettes are like 10 bucks a freaking pack in New York. WTF is this guy smoking?
Obviously not ciggerettes
Posted by: LouisianaLightning at January 19, 2010 10:55 AM (yGmLl)
Tax on corn syrup?????WTF????
These morons fail to forget was that the likes of the Adams family smuggled molasses (bought from Spanish colonies) into the colonies to get around the British sugar tax.
idiots
Posted by: torabora at January 19, 2010 10:55 AM (b6/rx)
Welcome to America, 2010.
We all KNOW that cuts have to be made, and we are FURIOUS that our leaders haven't made the cuts... that affect someone other than us. Just keep your hands off of my public transportation subsidies, my "cadillac" Medicare and Medicaid, my B-2 bombers, my corn subsidies, my "green energy" subsidies, etc.
Those are "necessities."
Posted by: RobM1981 at January 19, 2010 10:56 AM (cFGyS)
23
Plus, aren't the Caribbean countries which sell sugar, like, poor and stuff? Maybe if we bought more sugar they'd be less poor.
You can thank the Democraps in congress for that. They have a strict quota on sugar imports to "protect Louisinanna sugar growers". It has cause all the candy makers in this country to shut their doors and everyone to switch to fructose corn syrup.
Screw all these sad-sack-o'-shit "farmers" who want to make a buck doing anything but farm. I thought all the farming was done by evil corporations anyway. Doesn't that make it more corporate welfare that's fuckin' up my candy 'n' sody pop?
Posted by: Dang at January 19, 2010 10:56 AM (UA4gE)
Posted by: torabora at January 19, 2010 10:56 AM (b6/rx)
Posted by: wherestherum at January 19, 2010 10:57 AM (a2N1Y)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 19, 2010 02:45 PM (SqAkN)
Cigarettes from out of state.
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 19, 2010 10:57 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Ms. Coakley at January 19, 2010 10:57 AM (NgoAe)
Posted by: Keith Olbermann at January 19, 2010 10:58 AM (qyKoF)
Posted by: Looking Glass at January 19, 2010 10:58 AM (4nPBL)
--------------------------------------------------------
You can really thank both parties for that. Farming subsidies/protections are voted for by which ever party happens to run the affected state. Yes, it probably trends more towards Dems' modus operandi, but it's really the system that's corrupt here.
Posted by: whatever at January 19, 2010 10:59 AM (XIXhw)
Posted by: wherestherum at January 19, 2010 11:02 AM (a2N1Y)
Posted by: Luca Brasi at January 19, 2010 11:02 AM (YmPwQ)
OT but has anyone checked out the video of the D woman in Lawrence passing out blank absentee ballots by a poll on MM's website? Disgusting, in broad daylight.
I hope she gets arrested.
Posted by: logprof at January 19, 2010 11:03 AM (A+6fk)
Posted by: Joe Biden at January 19, 2010 11:03 AM (qyKoF)
Posted by: Peaches at January 19, 2010 11:04 AM (9Wv2j)
Boston Globe, "Hey, I know! Let's suppress the conservative vote and say it was an innocent accident! Yeah, that'll work!"
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 19, 2010 11:06 AM (RkRxq)
After watching an episode of Jersey Shore, I think that NJ could completely wipe out their entire debt by simply shifting all taxes to just one on hairspray.
EC aka "The Situation"
Posted by: EC at January 19, 2010 11:07 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 19, 2010 02:53 PM (hF8Tn)
here's other political positions she's taken just to give people a barometer on her thinking:
- She says Reagan was an ok president but overrated
- Says Clinton was just a typical Politician
- Has No Opinion On Dubya or HW
- Says Carter wasn't that bad and voted for him
- says Nixon was the best President in her lifetime but watergate messed him up
- Loves Kennedy & Eisenhower
- says Obama is Hoover 2.0
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 11:08 AM (MxqA5)
Yeah. Someone should do something 'bout that. Unfortunately, we aren't privy to the facts. But we can proceed with investigating that stalker who taped her. Justice must be served.
Posted by: Eric Holder (USAG) & Martha Coakley (MAAG) at January 19, 2010 11:10 AM (hF8Tn)
Posted by: logprof at January 19, 2010 02:49 PM (A+6fk)
after I tasted Pepsi throwback I was pissed that sodas didn't have real sugar, not only is it better tasting but less addicting too
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 11:10 AM (MxqA5)
Even the reliably liberal NJ TV stations are making a big, positive-sounding deal about Christie's inauguration. They must have really hated Corzine.
Posted by: Holdfast at January 19, 2010 11:14 AM (Gzb30)
So Patterson says we've taxed and spent and used accounting tricks for too long. Natrually what we need to do is PROJECT more CIGARETTE INCOME that we will never see, YET we'll spend the money anyway.
That ought to work out real good.
The FIRST thing every Governor should do is SLASH GOVERMENT Bureaucracy.
Posted by: gus at January 19, 2010 11:19 AM (Vqruj)
...so we subsidize the production of corn syrup with tax dollars (which may or may not be consumer dollars, since how many consumers don't pay any income taxes?) which makes it wicked cheap and encourages consumption, then collect tax dollars from the sale of corn syrup, which drives up the price and reduces consumption. How about just getting the gov't out of corn syrup altogether and let it settle itself out? Because it's none of government's fucking business how much soda I'm mixing with my rum.
Hey, Paterson is calling for reduced spending and cutbacks of state programs. I don't think he actually believes in small government as much as he's taking shit from Barry, so he's doing the opposite of What Barry Would Do. And the Assembly will make sure he doesn't get them. But it's kinda refreshing.
The new NY beer tax (effective 01/01/10) is killing me.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 19, 2010 11:19 AM (mR7mk)
She sounds like one of them independents. Frankly, I have a hard time reconciling some of the selections. It's all over the map. Does her barometer always read "Mild with Hot and Cold mixed in"? Reagan : OK :: Carter : Not That Bad? Yikes. But she does have both Clinton and Obama nailed.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 19, 2010 11:20 AM (hF8Tn)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 19, 2010 11:21 AM (mR7mk)
And they wonder why people drive to the Indian reservations to buy smokes in bulk.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 19, 2010 11:21 AM (YkEce)
Proof that America's education system collapsed some time ago. Attending Journalism school leads to graduates being unable to connect dots, to draw logical conclusions or to ask probing questions, such as, "What the f--k got us here in the first place, imbicile?"
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 19, 2010 11:22 AM (RkRxq)
Wherever I go in the Empire State, I see nothing to indicate that taxes are too high, and should not be higher. I've looked high and low, and without greater tax revenue, there will be no light at the end of the tunnel. I've watched the polls, and looked out for the poor and middle class. I've seen pain, and I've seen triumph. But, in my view, there is nothing more important than getting the needed revenue to see us through to the next fiscal year.
Expect to see the fat cats scanning their corporations' books to look to see if they can cut some fat. Working families will have to sacrifice, with a view to cutting down on unecessary expenditures. And most of all, I will cut out waste, fraud, and abuse, wherever I lay my eyes on it here in Albany.
We can see this through, together. There will be a brighter tomorrow.
Posted by: Gov David Paterson at January 19, 2010 11:22 AM (e8YaH)
Even the reliably liberal NJ TV stations are making a big, positive-sounding deal about Christie's inauguration. They must have really hated Corzine.
Posted by: Holdfast
Yep, I used to work in NYC and moved to NJ. Save a lot of money on taxes. The year I moved I had to File NY State, NYC, NJ and Fed. What a nightmare. If I was smart I'd move to Texas.
Optimistic about Christie, he's is staying consistent with his message.
Posted by: Eeyore at January 19, 2010 11:25 AM (LdYLm)
Heather 65 , lo, for they are truly the Chosen People. Amen. (Except for Manischewitz. Yecch! What the hell do they put in that stuff?)
But I'd feel guilty buying up all the good sugary treats and leaving behind all those mournful jars of gefilte.
Posted by: The Fat Lady at January 19, 2010 11:25 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Ian S. at January 19, 2010 11:26 AM (p05LM)
Posted by: Just Another Poster at January 19, 2010 11:26 AM (NgoAe)
Ahem. Enough with the plus-sized pantyhose puppet....
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 11:26 AM (9Sbz+)
You can really thank both parties for that. Farming subsidies/protections are voted for by which ever party happens to run the affected state.
I specifically mentioned Dems from LA because of John Breaux who pushed those sugar quotas. The R's were hap[py to give him those because he ofton "corssed over" to vote with them.
Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 11:28 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 19, 2010 03:20 PM (hF8Tn)
yep, she's an actual registered indepedents, I find them annoying because they just go w/ whoever they didn't vote for the last time, when my brother tries to argue Republicans have been more succesful or how bad Carter was she starts talking about how Republicans are "just as bad", these are the people who helped get Obama elected (granted she voted for McCain), here's her voting history:
1956: Eisenhower
1960: Kennedy
1964: Johnson
1968: Nixon
1972: Nixon
1976: Carter
1980: Carter
1984: Reagan
1988: Poppy Bush
1992: Perot
1996: Dole
2000: Dubya
2004: Dubya
2008: McCain
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 11:30 AM (MxqA5)
It's not just the sugar tariffs, it's the infinite subsidies for corn syrup, ethanol, and other corn products.
What subsidies? There are no "subsidies" that I am aware of, only a requirement that a certain percentage of all gasoline be ethanol.
Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 11:30 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: HeatherRadish
Making your own isn't that hard if you have the kitchen space, and it has a kind of Revolutionary angle to it as well.
Posted by: Iskandar at January 19, 2010 11:31 AM (doEqS)
It's on - they're eating their own. This is from H/A:
The Coakley campaign is bridling at finger-pointing from the White House and Washington Democrats, and outside adviser to the campaign has provided to POLITICO a memo aimed at rebutting the charge that Coakley failed, and making the case that national Democrats failed her.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent (M) at January 19, 2010 11:32 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 11:33 AM (9Sbz+)
The new NY beer tax (effective 01/01/10) is killing me.
Posted by: HeatherRadish
Ha, it is 7 times higher in SC than NY (0.77 per gal in SC vs 0.11 in NY)
Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 11:33 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 19, 2010 11:34 AM (n6iqK)
Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 03:31 PM (QrA9E)
that's what happens when indepedents have the power, these folks voted for Obama and 1 year later are whining "he lied to us", no you guys refused to look at his record and fell for the charm and speeches
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 11:34 AM (MxqA5)
What subsidies? There are no "subsidies" that I am aware of, only a requirement that a certain percentage of all gasoline be ethanol.
Posted by: VicUm, these subsidies for instance.
Posted by: Iskandar at January 19, 2010 11:35 AM (doEqS)
Either way the government's forcing our money to go to ADM et al by force of law. It's just slightly more efficient this way since it doesn't go through the IRS first.
Posted by: Ian S. at January 19, 2010 11:35 AM (p05LM)
Posted by: newser at January 19, 2010 11:36 AM (OBUuM)
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 11:36 AM (9Sbz+)
but also we put tariffs against Brasilian ethanol. Thus pissing off the most powerful nation in the Southern Hemisphere, by the way.
Yep, those evil Brazillians make their ethanol from sugar beets and not corn so they must be limited. It is actually cost effective to nmake ethanol from sugar beets where it is not for corn.
The corn BS is all politics and another "plum" given to Nebraska.
Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 11:36 AM (QrA9E)
The liberal base is truly stupid.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner At Large at January 19, 2010 11:37 AM (erIg9)
Posted by: Eeyore at January 19, 2010 11:40 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: soulpile at January 19, 2010 11:42 AM (gH+Hj)
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at January 19, 2010 11:44 AM (CfmlF)
87 Zimriel
Democrats abroad came through with as much turd-polish as they could spare.
Are you infering that "turd-polish" is a democrat campaign staple?
Posted by: Sisyphus at January 19, 2010 11:45 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Luca Brasi at January 19, 2010 03:02 PM (YmPwQ)
We see lots of out of state license plates in parking lots.
Cigarettes, booze, etc.
No sales tax will do that for you.
Posted by: always right at January 19, 2010 11:46 AM (7GfKM)
I support the tax on corn syrup.
No, no, more taxes are not the answer. Less gov't would help. Fewer farm subsides, fewer quotas, etc. etc.
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 19, 2010 11:47 AM (Be4xl)
Posted by: Martha Coakley at January 19, 2010 11:48 AM (LdYLm)
The Coakley campaign is bridling at finger-pointing from the White House The Coakley campaign is bridling at finger-pointing from the White House
She's going to make Dede look like a gracefull, classy loser.
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 19, 2010 11:51 AM (Be4xl)
Basically, if you're in a state (or, in Canada's case, country) where everyone lives within about a halfhour drive to the border of another state, it's unwise to implement a sales tax.
Two states could set up a parallel structure. To me this sounds like what my Economics prof called a "cartel". We learnt in ECON 210 that cartels rarely last long before one conspirator shafts the other.
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 11:52 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Blue Hen at January 19, 2010 11:54 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 19, 2010 11:56 AM (Be4xl)
Posted by: Eeyore at January 19, 2010 03:40 PM (LdYLm)
Yep, that certainly happens. But when you have people like state assemblywoman Susan John who was busted for drunk driving; The same Susan John who sat(may still) on the state assembly's committee for alcohol and drug abuse, not only get off basically scott free, but overwhelmingly re-elected, then you know there are a shit ton of idiots still here.
(yeah yeah run on sentence from hell, you know what I mean)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner At Large at January 19, 2010 11:56 AM (erIg9)
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 11:58 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Brendan at January 19, 2010 11:58 AM (saRwI)
Posted by: ford at January 19, 2010 11:59 AM (Ki7fm)
Brendan, I bet if you posted that idea on a liberal web site, you'd get a lot of support!
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 19, 2010 12:01 PM (Be4xl)
109 the Gov'mint takes taxes, and then SUPERVISES where you spend the rest of your money...
Sounds good to me! One must keep a tight rein upon those in one's charge.
And if you complain like that again, you're banned.
Posted by: Churlz Juhnsun at January 19, 2010 12:02 PM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Zimriel
I like it. It reminds me of the notion of "Delaware Free State", from Robert Heinlein's novel 'Friday'. We could move the tax free sign to the end of the peninsula and attract that off-shore crowd!
Second thought: Governance will be derived from the county that wins the Punkin' Chunkin' contest that year.
Posted by: Blue Hen at January 19, 2010 12:06 PM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Just a Cynic.... at January 19, 2010 12:17 PM (v4UYp)
Posted by: Luca Brasi at January 19, 2010 12:21 PM (YmPwQ)
"mistakes of the past, the squandering of surpluses, the papering over of deficits, the relying on gimmicks to finance unsustainable spending increases has led us to the breaking point,"
That all sounds pretty valid and very true... but is pulling more money out of the New York economy and encouraging people to invest elsewhere and move away really going to help?
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 19, 2010 01:40 PM (PQY7w)
Here is the way local government works.
SC used to have the highest property tax in the country on automobiles and boats. People raised hell about it.
The State legislature passed a law last year that raised sales tax by 2% and limited the property tax on autos, as well as stripped the school tax from property tax on autos and your home (only one that you live in).
Well our county couold not stand that. So they limited the tax AND then added a huge fee on top of another fee they already had.
The tax on my 13 year old F-150 went from $75 to over a hundred.
And rthe sales tax is now among the highest in the country now. IN town (which has an addional 2 cents) the sales tax is 10.5%.
Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 01:52 PM (QrA9E)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2368 seconds, 244 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 10:37 AM (MxqA5)