June 21, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Awesome.
This morning Barnes & Noble announced that it was dropping the price of its ebook reader, the Nook, to $149 for a wifi version and $199 for the 3G version. Now, I would never buy a Nook, but I have been giving the Kindle some sideeye for the past year.
Reacting to Barnes & NobleÂ’s price cut on the Nook Monday morning, Amazon.com has just dropped the price of its Kindle e-reader to $189 from $259.
Both are now approaching Gabriel Malor ImpulseBuy™ levels. I've been using Kindle for iPhone on my iPod Touch for maybe a year now. In fact, when I started, I was just buying Amazon eBooks for convenience on the metro. But then, I noticed that I was irritated by the bulkiness of real books at home too. Seriously, why lug around a hardcover or lengthy paperback rather than my iPod, which I always have with me for music anyway?
So it's been a loooong time since I bought an honest-to-God book made out of paper and stuff. And while I love my iPod, I'm about ready to graduate to a full-size e-reader.
New issue: do I get the Kindle or wait around for the iPad second generation? I won't get the first version, they always need to work out so many kinks. But I'm gonna be drooling for the next iPad... Oh, and there's a rumor that Amazon is working on a touchscreen Kindle, too.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
11:38 AM
| Comments (176)
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Newsweek (brother, can you spare a dime?) at June 21, 2010 11:40 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: runningrn at June 21, 2010 11:41 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 21, 2010 11:42 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: damian at June 21, 2010 11:43 AM (4WbTI)
Posted by: andi sullivan (LGBT) at June 21, 2010 11:44 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: TexBob at June 21, 2010 11:45 AM (2jp4I)
I don't know much about capitalism, but what we do know is that Amazon acted stupidly.
Posted by: Chairman Maobama at June 21, 2010 11:45 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: robtr at June 21, 2010 11:45 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Netflix guy at June 21, 2010 11:46 AM (e8YaH)
It's funemployment that makes me post like an inane moron.
Oh no, I'm so sorry to hear that. What kind of work did you do?
Posted by: Chairman Maobama at June 21, 2010 11:46 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: stuiec at June 21, 2010 11:47 AM (7AOgy)
OT
Eleven American battleships and an Israeli one crossed the Suez Canal Friday en route to the Red Sea, the London-based al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper reported.
According to the report, traffic in the canal was halted for several hours in order to allow US Navy vessels, which included an aircraft carrier and carried infantry troops, armored vehicles and ammunition, to pass from the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea.
It was further reported that eyewitnesses detected an Israeli warship among the vessels. No confirmation has been received from Egyptian authorities.
The report also noted that fishing activities in the area were stopped during the ships' passage as well as traffic on the bridges above the canal.
Retired Egyptian General Amin Radi, chairman of the national security affairs committee, told the paper that "the decision to declare war on Iran is not easy, and Israel, due to its wild nature, may start a war just to remain the sole nuclear power in the region.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at June 21, 2010 11:47 AM (w41GQ)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at June 21, 2010 11:47 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Brian in Idaho at June 21, 2010 11:48 AM (f1vXs)
I've been using the iPod Touch Kindle reader, and it's a little more awkward than the Kindle (the color is good, though--the Kindle is strictly gray-scale). The Kindle, with cover, is no more awkward to carry than a dayplanner. I carry mine with me a lot.
The one disadvantage that both eReaders have: you cannot create subfolders. So I've got 50+ pages of an index, instead of a nice subfolder system where I can store things by category.
I don't know if the iPad can do any better. To my mind, it looks like a toy that I'd get bored with in about a month and end up either selling or putting away somewhere.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at June 21, 2010 11:48 AM (eNxMU)
I think Target just started selling Kindles, Gabe. Check it out if you want to hold a real live one.
For reading the Kindle > iPad. E-ink is just a superior medium for regular text. Kindle's battery is also superior...I routinely get over a week out of one charge.
Posted by: JohnTant at June 21, 2010 11:49 AM (eytER)
I am a frequent visitor to Barnes & Noble, but not to gain knowledge or pursue a course of study that would improve my mind, but to simply ogle hooter's and pear shaped butt-tocks in the words of Forrest Gump.
Forrest was correct, life is nothing but smacking liberal ideology every time it raises its ugly head, and visiting bookstores to seek out future dalliances.
Posted by: Fish at June 21, 2010 11:49 AM (v1gw3)
Gonna be fun chucking all those kindles and i-whatevers on a pile when it comes time to burn some books.
Posted by: Dang Straights at June 21, 2010 11:50 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 21, 2010 11:50 AM (AZGON)
Part of the advantage of the iPad is the Kindle and Nook apps -- you can get books from Apple, Amazon, or B&N on an iPad; but there isn't (so far as I know) a way to cross-pollinate the Kindle and Nook.
*It's so big that we've got boxes of 'em in our garage. We can still fit the cars in it, so we haven't hit critical mass yet; but still ... books? in your garage? That aren't Chilton's manuals or carpentry patterns?
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at June 21, 2010 11:51 AM (vEhUz)
Posted by: EC at June 21, 2010 11:53 AM (mAhn3)
I haven't read a book on paper in a year, and I've gotten rid of hundreds of paper books - for the first time in my life, I have some empty bookshelves!
Posted by: VKI at June 21, 2010 11:53 AM (LZK9H)
I will never own a e-read for many reasons.
If I drop a book, i can pick it back up. If I drop an e-reader i am out hundreds of dollars.
If someone steals my book I am out ten bucks. If someone steals my e-reader i am out hundres of dollars.
If I spill a drink on my book, I let it dry out and then finish reading it. If I sprill a drink on an e-reader I am out hundreds of dollars.
I can't dog ear or under line pages in an e-reader for quick reference later on.
My bookshelves would become very lonely.
I don't have to worry about a battery dying while reading a book, where as I would have to worry about that with an e-reader.
I can have a book in my european man bag and not worry about it breaking.
When at a book burning rally I can just toss my books in, whereas with an e-reader I would have to worry about the deadly fumes released by burning plastics and electronics.
Posted by: Ben at June 21, 2010 11:53 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at June 21, 2010 11:53 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: JohnTant at June 21, 2010 11:53 AM (eytER)
Posted by: joncelli at June 21, 2010 11:53 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 21, 2010 11:55 AM (AZGON)
Didn't Kindle delete everyones copy of 1984? Which leads to the point that e-readers have a limited selection. Let's say you want to read a book that isn't the Twilight series, what do you do then? You have to pick from their limited selection
Posted by: Ben at June 21, 2010 11:56 AM (wuv1c)
I haven't read a book on paper in a year, and I've gotten rid of hundreds of paper books - for the first time in my life, I have some empty bookshelves!
I've doing the same thing. The Hollywood library is happy to take 'em and I'm tired of lugging the damn things around every time I move.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at June 21, 2010 11:56 AM (1TvCg)
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at June 21, 2010 11:56 AM (ps0+9)
General Sherman,
We may be marshaling forces, but the question remains, do Obama and the Joint Chiefs have the balls to use the force to protect Israel from attack?
If push comes to shove, Obama will razzle-dazzle the international community with his call for unity of purpose from the UN, and Tel Aviv will be a fucking smoldering mass of hair, teeth, and eyeballs.
PS - Stash will appear on Fox and tell the truth, but a little late.
Posted by: Fish at June 21, 2010 11:57 AM (v1gw3)
I'd much rather hold in my hands the actual book, as opposed to downloading books that can be taken away at any second if the company so feels like it.
Not to say that I haven't bought ebooks - I have some on my blackberry for a trip where real books were not feasible. However, I bought the solid versions once I returned home. I don't like the control over my reading material to extend past my own hands.
Posted by: soulpile at June 21, 2010 11:57 AM (gH+Hj)
And seriously, dude, lose the man bag.
Posted by: VKI at June 21, 2010 11:57 AM (LZK9H)
There's no reason to buy the thing if you're not actually going to use it.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at June 21, 2010 11:58 AM (vEhUz)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 21, 2010 11:58 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Hal at June 21, 2010 11:58 AM (MftY/)
Posted by: runninrebel at June 21, 2010 11:58 AM (i3PJU)
Let's say you want to read a book that isn't the Twilight series, what do you do then?
Count your blessings??
Posted by: laceyunderalls at June 21, 2010 11:58 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 21, 2010 11:58 AM (YPivX)
Posted by: joncelli at June 21, 2010 11:59 AM (RD7QR)
Heh. Yeah, a dedicated metro rider for two years now. I only end up using my car to move it for street cleaning or to drive to the west side to see friends or go to the beach. And I LOVE IT.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at June 21, 2010 12:00 PM (1TvCg)
1. "Warship" # "Battleship", but "Battleship" = "Warship"
2. Don't overlook the FREE downloadable Kindle software for PC and Mac. My wife already had an alomost new Acer Notebook and wanted to use Kindle, but didn't need another box to carry on her travels. Kindle software works good, not slick, just good.
Just sayin'
Posted by: sherlock at June 21, 2010 12:00 PM (xqzGc)
How many books exist for the kindle or e-readers?
thousands? hundreds of thousands?
what about books with pictures of diagrams?
Posted by: Ben at June 21, 2010 12:00 PM (wuv1c)
Meh.
I do not have an ipod... will never have an ipod, sometimes forget my cell phone (which does nothing but make and recieve calls and hasn't a keyboard!) and happen to like books.
I've something of a collection going.
In fact, I have hordes of paperbacks and use to only buy cheap paperbacks to read. But I've started buying slightly pricier hardcovers.
Posted by: Entropy at June 21, 2010 12:01 PM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Vic at June 21, 2010 12:01 PM (6taRI)
I will never own a e-read for many reasons.
Posted by: Ben at June 21, 2010 03:53 PM (wuv1c)
I'm with you Ben. Stick with print, because when the revolution is complete from Obama and Company, we can use the books like Sears & Roebuck Catalogs in our new backyard two-holers.
Posted by: Fish at June 21, 2010 12:01 PM (v1gw3)
Indeed. And you know about those giant, multi-thousand-book Scifi & Fantasy archives on the internet? Yeah, me neither. Me. Neither.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at June 21, 2010 12:01 PM (1TvCg)
Try reading your nephew a doctor seuss book off of kindle. without the drawings it is terrible.
Posted by: Ben at June 21, 2010 12:02 PM (wuv1c)
I prefer a library that smells of fine leather bindings.
That would rock, but do you know how much leather-bound books cost? Yikes. I read too much for that.
Posted by: Entropy at June 21, 2010 12:02 PM (IsLT6)
Howdy, runningrn... in advertising, don't want to be more specific than that. An industry larded with the worst kinds of libtards. And in severe cutback mode. Have you noticed advertisers are rerunning TV commercials over a year old, simply with new endings to update matters like dates and prices?
Very, very bad out here.
Shoot, that really sucks. It is ironic, though, that an industry "larded with the worst kinds of libtards" is being hit so hard. I'm sure though, that the idiots this affects who are still swooning over Obama, bitterly blame George Bush. Anecdotally in my neck of the woods, it seems like there are a lot of unemployed architects running around. That too, is an industry that seemed to be rife with Obamabots.
I hope you can find some work soon!
Posted by: runningrn at June 21, 2010 12:02 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Waterhouse at June 21, 2010 12:02 PM (LUllJ)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 21, 2010 12:03 PM (AZGON)
It is ironic, though, that an industry "larded with the worst kinds of libtards" is being hit so hard.
I would call it 'justice'.
Posted by: Dang Straights at June 21, 2010 12:03 PM (fx8sm)
It sounds like maybe you have slightly researched the Sony store or something, and have extrapolated from there. Amazon and Barnes & Noble have hundreds of thousands of books available, and thousands more public domain books are available through them or elsewhere for free.
Posted by: VKI at June 21, 2010 12:03 PM (LZK9H)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 21, 2010 12:04 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Retread at June 21, 2010 12:04 PM (LVSCd)
Call me old fashioned, but I don't give a damn about these gizmos. I like the feel of paper in my hands. I like to underline passages, fold back the pages, use it as a spacer under my whiskey still. I like real honest to God books!
Don't like cellphones much either. The cellphone I have is turned off right now, as is usual. When I went into Radio Shack to get it I told the kid behind the counter I wanted a phone that talked, I didn't want a phone that surfed the web, took pictures, sent text messages, etc. because I didn't want to learn all that crap. He said "that's the trouble with you older people, you don't get technology".
I said "well who do you think came up with all this technology? Let me tell you who it wasn't. It wasn't some shot nosed 20 year old kid standing behind the counter at Radio Shack."
Posted by: maddogg at June 21, 2010 12:05 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: USA at June 21, 2010 12:05 PM (YZISw)
Posted by: Jason at June 21, 2010 12:07 PM (UlYs4)
I would call it 'justice'.
Speaking of justice, I'm trying to eat my post-lunch Hershey Bar, and it won't break nice and evenly on the score lines. Who can I sue for this outrage?
Posted by: runningrn at June 21, 2010 12:07 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 21, 2010 12:07 PM (Qp4DT)
I will never understand the ereader or 'buying' an e-book.
or
Get off my Lawn!
Exactly. While I use my pootur for smart typewriting, and blogs and research, and online banking, and buying and selling, and "pron", I still want to read a real papery book thingy. Call me cranky.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at June 21, 2010 12:07 PM (ujg0T)
I said "well who do you think came up with all this technology? Let me tell you who it wasn't. It wasn't some shot nosed 20 year old kid standing behind the counter at Radio Shack."
Heh! Heh! I looove grumpy old men--they're sooo cute!
Posted by: runningrn at June 21, 2010 12:08 PM (CfmlF)
For reading from, I actually greatly prefer a paperback, which are also dirt cheap.
But I started tossing out a bit more cash for hardbacks because it turns out books actually retain their value somewhat, and it looks nice on my shelf.
Posted by: Entropy at June 21, 2010 12:08 PM (IsLT6)
i'm not a luddit and i don't own a shack in Montana. I just don't see myself giving up on paper back books for e-readers.
Posted by: Ben at June 21, 2010 12:09 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 21, 2010 12:09 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: robtr at June 21, 2010 12:09 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Ben at June 21, 2010 12:10 PM (wuv1c)
Thinking of buying one for myself ditching a large part of my library.
Posted by: rls at June 21, 2010 12:10 PM (mekQN)
I also think it's creepy to have to have the files sent to you, with control over the personal copy still maintained by the seller.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 21, 2010 12:11 PM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Keggin at June 21, 2010 12:12 PM (46TLK)
Posted by: Chef Boyardee guy at June 21, 2010 12:12 PM (e8YaH)
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at June 21, 2010 12:13 PM (ps0+9)
Way off topic, but USA Today is reporting the following:
WASHINGTON — The number of doctors refusing new Medicare patients because of low government payment rates is setting a new high, just six months before millions of Baby Boomers begin enrolling in the government health care program.
Recent surveys by national and state medical societies have found more doctors limiting Medicare patients, partly because Congress has failed to stop an automatic 21% cut in payments that doctors already regard as too low. The cut went into effect Friday, even as the Senate approved a six-month reprieve. The House has approved a different bill.
Well, duh! (And I had a libtard argue with me just last week that Obamacare is going to improve healthcare for all!)
Posted by: runningrn at June 21, 2010 12:14 PM (CfmlF)
The old ways are still the best.
Posted by: damian, typing at his steam powered far-communicator device at June 21, 2010 12:14 PM (4WbTI)
Heh! Heh! I looove grumpy old men--they're sooo cute!
Posted by: runningrn at June 21, 2010 04:08 PM (CfmlF)
You are obviously a woman of discerning taste and refined intellect
Posted by: maddogg at June 21, 2010 12:14 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at June 21, 2010 12:15 PM (aHiMU)
Posted by: Truman North at June 21, 2010 12:15 PM (e8YaH)
Posted by: Ben at June 21, 2010 04:10 PM (wuv1c)
We'd rather not talk about a nuclear Barnes and Noble.
Posted by: Robert Gates at June 21, 2010 12:15 PM (T0NGe)
"A White House spokesman says the United States benefits when President Barack Obama takes time to go golfing and 'clear his mind.' "
LOL. That is one mind that doesn't need any clearing. It's been empty from day one.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 21, 2010 12:15 PM (Qp4DT)
Next version should have silent buttons.
Don't you worry about that! All e-Readers will have silent buttons in the future! They will silence all kinds of "fishy notions and anti-gubamint speech."
Posted by: Homeland Security in Conjunction with the FCC at June 21, 2010 12:16 PM (CfmlF)
Yeah. How's that workin' out for ya?
Posted by: AmishDude at June 21, 2010 12:16 PM (T0NGe)
"A White House spokesman says the United States benefits when President Barack Obama takes time to go golfing and 'clear his mind.' "
Rush made fun of that this a.m. He said the spokesman is basically admitting that the country is in better shape when Obama is absent from doing his job.
Posted by: Homeland Security in Conjunction with the FCC at June 21, 2010 12:17 PM (CfmlF)
We endorse this.
Posted by: Scientologists at June 21, 2010 12:18 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at June 21, 2010 04:15 PM (aHiMU)
Most of those (if not all) are available free as plain text files. The problem with the Kindle is that there is always control kept. When they surreptitiously erased/replaced copies of some book on people's Kindles, that was too much for me.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 21, 2010 12:18 PM (Qp4DT)
I'm kind of down on the whole digital content ownership thing altogether. Which is probably why my respect for copyright has always been lax. I tend to steal shit. At least when 'shit' is a bunch of 0's and 1's.
Which is why I'll buy books and CD's and DVD's as long as their sold. I feel the same way about software... If I'm going to pay for it, I want a hard copy on CD that comes in a nice box. If you're just going to let me download the program... that's what bittorrent and crackers are for. I ain't paying you for that. Screw you.
If I chuck over real money I want something material for it. Something that can't just be deleted, forceably 'updated', or have it's EULA changed. Something I can hold and maybe even resell.
I've no qualms about "stealing" music really.. if I like it alot, I'll go out and buy the CD, to have the material copy, nicely manufactured, with a neat booklet and cover art, etc., support the band etc. But I ain't buying no itunes mp3s.
Same thing with DVDs. I bought a couple I saw for free on TV, because I liked them and wanted to have a copy.
And a great thing about books is they work when the power is out. They're paranoid-survivalist-ready.
Posted by: Entropy at June 21, 2010 12:19 PM (IsLT6)
i'm not a luddit and i don't own a shack in Montana. I just don't see myself giving up on paper back books for e-readers.
Geez, a shack in Montana? I could only dream!
Posted by: George Obama Who Lives In An Hut In Kenya at June 21, 2010 12:19 PM (CfmlF)
Same with my house -- in fact, it's starting to overflow into off-site storage.
But I got an iPad last month (hey, I program for a living, and developing for one of those is a new field), and I've picked up the PDF versions of a couple of technical books.
It's actually quite nice. I've got physical copies of the books (except for one that's still in beta), but they stay at home. I drop the PDFs into a directory managed by the "DropBox" program, and then they're available on every machine I use. I can get to the books at home, at work, and with the iPad. If I want to check on something, or read up on something I'm about to try for myself, they're Just There.
OTOH, there are still so many books that AREN'T available electronically. I want to read Gerrold's "War Against the Chtorr" series from the begining, but of course they're only available in hard copy. But they're out of print. So I ordered them from used book stores. But one of the stores -- the one with the first book, natch -- is taking WEEKS to actually ship it.
I think this reinforces my idea that copyrights should be lost if the copyright holder is not attempting to distribute the material.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at June 21, 2010 12:20 PM (ZJ/un)
Posted by: joncelli at June 21, 2010 12:20 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: mpfs at June 21, 2010 12:23 PM (iYbLN)
I'm considering an e-reader...and I am doing my own pollingI have to fly a lot for my job..and whenever I see someone in the airport lounge or on the plane with a Kindle or Nook I just come out and ask them how they like it...the e-reader, I mean..not IT...if I just came out and asked them how the liked IT...well that would be weird
..anyhoo..to a person..every one said they liked it..the e-reader...not IT
But they could just be lying like big old bunch of fucking Obamas..
..and if ya start thinking about it...those who don't like their e-readers wouldn't be lugging them around
So, now I have to go around asking everyone I see reading a book if they really have an e-reader at home and just don't care for it..
Fuck
Posted by: beedubya at June 21, 2010 12:24 PM (AnTyA)
So, now I have to go around asking everyone I see reading a book if they really have an e-reader at home and just don't care for it..
Well, there's always voluntary commitment.
Weirdo question guy.
Posted by: Dang Straights at June 21, 2010 12:25 PM (fx8sm)
Posted by: helpinghands at June 21, 2010 12:28 PM (r0Mue)
Posted by: Ben at June 21, 2010 12:29 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: helpinghands at June 21, 2010 12:29 PM (r0Mue)
It's not like if you get an e-book reader you are never allowed to read a regular book again in your life. Nobody is going to come take all your books away. I still go to the library and the bookstore. I still have lots of books in my house. I love the feel and the smell and the comfort of physical books.
If you like your paper books, you can keep your paper books...
Posted by: Chairman Maobama at June 21, 2010 12:29 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Ben at June 21, 2010 04:29 PM (wuv1c)
Not only that, but can you take your e-reader and swat a pesky horse fly with it? I dare say it would be good for about ONE good smash against the wall.
Posted by: maddogg at June 21, 2010 12:32 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: mpfs at June 21, 2010 12:38 PM (iYbLN)
So far my only complaint about the ipad is that it's a little heavier than your average book so if you're reading while lying in bed, your arms get tired after a while. But I'm sure someone will come out with a stand to make this easier.
And as people have pointed out an e-reader is not going to replace books. Trust me - I've got bookshelves and bookshelves of books and expect to get more in the future. But I've also got tons of books in pdf format so it's nice to be able to read them away from the computer without having to print them out. Especially for technical documents that are only distributed in electronic form.
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 21, 2010 12:38 PM (f5vi+)
Not only that, but can you take your e-reader and swat a pesky horse fly with it? I dare say it would be good for about ONE good smash against the wall.
Posted by: maddoggI have indoor plumbing not an outhouse in my household.
Posted by: mpfs at June 21, 2010 12:39 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: dixshooter at June 21, 2010 12:40 PM (M0hka)
No longer is my luggage overweight on flights because it's jam packed full of reading material. No longer is every flat surface in my living room stacked with books I'm waiting to read. No longer are my arms uncomfortable holding a three-pound book while lying in my back reading in bed.
Downside? I do miss book covers. Forgettable books are even more forgettable because there isn't a cover to remember them by. And, if you like pictures in your books (and you know who you are), I wouldn't recommend a Kindle.
As far as costs, my Kindles have paid for themselves in savings on hardcover. I gave my 1G Kindle to a friend when I bought the 2G. I also bought a 2G for my cousin who has macular degeneration. Instead of buying her $30 large print books (which are also heavy), she can download most anything recent onto her kindle and increase the print size. It is well worth the money.
Posted by: kathysaysso at June 21, 2010 12:40 PM (ZtwUX)
Posted by: Retread at June 21, 2010 12:43 PM (LVSCd)
Posted by: mpfs at June 21, 2010 04:39 PM (iYbLN)
You have become far too dependant on technology. To shit in the woods is to taste freedom!
Posted by: maddogg at June 21, 2010 12:43 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: DaveS at June 21, 2010 12:44 PM (vy1Up)
I got the old sony version and they upgraded it for free to be compatible so all in all it cost me $50 to get started and the ebooks are cheaper than the real thing AND I don' t have to store them or haul them away.
Posted by: dagny at June 21, 2010 12:46 PM (uCq1g)
if you're reading while lying in bed, your arms get tired after a while.
Ix-nay on the pr0n talk
Posted by: beedubya at June 21, 2010 12:46 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: dagny at June 21, 2010 12:47 PM (uCq1g)
Paper isn't expensive -- book stores throw books away instead of shipping them back.
Seriously: the cost of printing a book is only 10% of the cost of producing one.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at June 21, 2010 12:47 PM (vEhUz)
But the nook costs $199, and the Kindle costs $189. What are you talking about?
Posted by: VKI at June 21, 2010 12:47 PM (LZK9H)
Posted by: VKI at June 21, 2010 12:49 PM (LZK9H)
Posted by: mpfs at June 21, 2010 04:39 PM (iYbLN)
You have become far too dependant on technology. To shit in the woods is to taste freedom!
Posted by: maddoggLet's just say I won't be inviting you over to my place anytime soon for dinner.
Posted by: mpfs at June 21, 2010 12:50 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Ed Anger at June 21, 2010 12:50 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: DaveS at June 21, 2010 04:44 PM (vy1Up)
Not in my experience. You can adjust the fonts, text size, and contrast to however you like. And so far I haven't noticed any extra eye fatigue or other effects from reading on it for extended periods.
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 21, 2010 12:50 PM (f5vi+)
Let's just say I won't be inviting you over to my place anytime soon for dinner.
I'm as crushed as a horse fly hit with an original edition of "War and Peace".
Posted by: maddogg at June 21, 2010 12:52 PM (OlN4e)
It's not like books are going away any time too soon, but soon enough to scare book fetishists. The market has made that crucial shift to the point of no return.
Go to any large bookstore. See anything different on the floor? The books are still there. But all of the sections have been compressed to make room for non-downloadable product. The tale is more apparent in the music/movie section. CDs are pretty much gone. Movies have only another couple of years to go before they go the same road as CDs.
The way I see it, if books don't disappear as quickly as CDs and DVDs it's only because they've been around much longer and have generations of tradition behind them, but the cultural momentum to keep the market that produces physical books, at least the kind that can be easily reproduced in paperback, is losing steam. Ditto magazines and newspapers.
There's no way in hell I would have said any of this a couple of years ago, but I work at a B&N and I've been watching it happen.
Go for the Nook.
That's a phrase that sounds good any day of the week.
Posted by: Cameron at June 21, 2010 12:52 PM (HxOLT)
Posted by: Jeff Weimer at June 21, 2010 12:55 PM (1Mn8Z)
I'm as crushed as a horse fly hit with an original edition of "War and Peace".
Do you know how much an original edition of "War and Peace" costs??
Besides, first English edition? Wouldn't the original be in Russian?
Do you read cyrillic?
Semi-rare/collectable books are very expensive.
Posted by: Entropy at June 21, 2010 12:55 PM (IsLT6)
The Kindle can support pictures, do they just not include them in the eBooks?
Posted by: whatever at June 21, 2010 12:56 PM (XIXhw)
Semi-rare/collectable books are very expensive.
Expensive books crush horse flys just as well as the cheap ones. They're flexible like that.
Posted by: maddogg at June 21, 2010 12:57 PM (OlN4e)
If you're crushing flies with an original War and Peace I demand you send it to me right now.
Or... Or... I'll be absolutely aghast about it!
I'll send you a paperback copies of Atlas Shrugged/The Stand/The Great Book of Amber/The Count of Monte Cristo/the Bible.
Posted by: Entropy at June 21, 2010 01:00 PM (IsLT6)
If you're crushing flies with an original War and Peace I demand you send it to me right now.
Or... Or... I'll be absolutely aghast about it!
You should be thankful. You know what we do with paper in Arkansas.....
Posted by: maddogg at June 21, 2010 01:03 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Ken Nelson at June 21, 2010 01:06 PM (yB1LJ)
Posted by: 4rc at June 21, 2010 01:10 PM (zmZuA)
I shall purchase absolutely nothing that's proper noun starts with a lower case i followed by a capital consonant.
I bought an mp3 player.. I think it's a Sony. Definetly not an ipod.
Posted by: Entropy at June 21, 2010 01:10 PM (IsLT6)
Posted by: KLH at June 21, 2010 01:13 PM (4+tm0)
Posted by: sulla at June 21, 2010 01:13 PM (Y4/VY)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 21, 2010 01:14 PM (554T5)
Posted by: cold canadian at June 21, 2010 01:18 PM (tmj4/)
In addition you cannot go sit outside and read on your clunky ipad, but you can with the kindle e ink. it fits in one hand like a book. I adapted to the button to turn pages quickly and it is no more annoying than turning the page of a book, ie it isnt.
Penguin is dixcking we bookworms around thanks to Apples IPAD frakking up the ebook pricing. AMN had the model at 9.99 for new releases and then Steve Jobs MR DRM himself, came along offering the publishers the ability to set their own prices on the ebooks, so now Penguin new releases are HIGHER than some hardcover books on AMZN, The stoopid it burns!
Since I have no shelf space left, no storage space, no room for another box of books, I am bitterly, clinging, heh, and fighting Penguin. I will not enable them to gouge me on these prices on ebooks for Charlaine Harris and Laurell K Hamilton. Many of we Kindle readers are waiting them out, when the paperbacks release the Kindle version price will come down :0) see AMZN for our 9.99 Kindle Penguin Charlaine Harris price wars threads!
I reccomend the Kindle.
Posted by: mim/ginaswo at June 21, 2010 01:21 PM (jeGiR)
" Did Gabe really say he'd never pay for Nooky?"
I thought everyone knew that.
Posted by: right at June 21, 2010 04:53 PM (EquV1)
***cymbal crash***Posted by: Ed Anger at June 21, 2010 01:27 PM (7+pP9)
I got the DX. I like the size better. The good thing about the Kindle vs. the IPad is that it isn't back-lit. A LOT less eye strain, and as folks have said, the battery charge lasts forever in comparison. Most of the content on Amazon is $9.99 a pop, and it's bound to get cheaper. Like others have said, I'm running out of room for books, so I had to do something. My basic rule of thumb is that if I consider it to be an important book, something I want to keep long-term and read more than once, I'll go hard-copy. If I suspect it's a read-once-and-toss mass-market flavor of the month, I go hard copy.
Plus, as someone mentioned above, Newspapers and magazines are dirt cheap on the kindle, my local fish-wrapper (Philadelphia Inquirer) is 6 bucks a month. Granted, you don't get all the content, but still...
Posted by: Ombudsman at June 21, 2010 01:35 PM (y4B2y)
The eyestrain thing is repeated endlessly, but never actually been demonstrated by anyone, as far as I can tell.
Put it this way: I sit in front of a back-lit monitor at home, then at work all day, then at home again. None of that's ever bothered me and I love being able to adjust font size to be comfortable on all of 'em. A back-lit eReader isn't going to make any difference...and hasn't. As I said, I've been using the iPod Touch as a reader for a year now. Love it.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at June 21, 2010 01:52 PM (1TvCg)
Posted by: Dontawakenthewife at June 21, 2010 01:58 PM (sfNbl)
I have 20,133 ebooks on my desktop and load a dozen at a time on my Kindle to last me a week or so. Not only does the Kindle accept several formats, but almost any available format can be remade into Kindle format by Caliber. You can download books, use usb to transfer books, or email yourself books (it has it's own email address). Amazon will convert anything to Kindle format and send them to the device for a tiny charge...if you buy a book on Amazon they will send it to the Kindle for free. Amazon even has a free conversion service, but they require you to load the converted book yourself via usb or email.
It has a web browser so yes, you can get porn.
The battery lasts a week at least.
It is not backlit, so you need ambient light. The reading surface is amazing and comfortable to the eyes. It's easy to carry.
This is hands-down the best gadget I've seen of it's type.
Posted by: trainer at June 21, 2010 02:00 PM (yCWYQ)
Posted by: dagny at June 21, 2010 02:27 PM (uCq1g)
What leads you think that producing an e-book is all that much cheaper than a tree book?
Posted by: Deety at June 21, 2010 02:48 PM (aVzyR)
Posted by: ahem at June 21, 2010 02:52 PM (Sp/Ir)
Posted by: Deety at June 21, 2010 06:48 PM (aVzyR)
Reduced warehousing and transportation costs, to start?
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 21, 2010 02:53 PM (Qp4DT)
Reduced warehousing and transportation costs, to start?
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 21, 2010 06:53 PM (Qp4DT)
Yeah, but how much of the total cost of production does that entail? I mean, I can see the clear advantages and all but I'm unclear what percentage of the production cost of say, your average paperback novel, printing and binding and transporting it is.
Posted by: Deety at June 21, 2010 03:49 PM (aVzyR)
Reduced warehousing and transportation costs, to start?
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 21, 2010 06:53 PM (Qp4DT)
Yeah, but how much of the total cost of production does that entail? I mean, I can see the clear advantages and all but I'm unclear what percentage of the production cost of say, your average paperback novel, printing and binding and transporting it is.
Posted by: Deety at June 21, 2010 07:49 PM (aVzyR)
You don't have to *print* the book, which saves you the costs of paper and printing. You don't have to hire people to order the book, stock the book or sell the book. That is on top ot the warehousing and transportation costs
Posted by: cold canadian at June 21, 2010 04:01 PM (hDDka)
I'm going to have to disagree somewhat with not needing to pay someone to order, stock or sell the books.
I mean yeah, no one has to actually deal with the physical books but there will still be a need for someone to "set up shop" even if it's only on the internet where readers can select from a much winnowed down mass of possibly available titles from a vendor whose reputation for quality and selection they trust.
I'm also not too convinced that the $1.00 a song, i-Tunes model would work for whole, you know, books. Sometimes I'm not too clear on how that works for songs, too be honest.
I mean, it's always amazed me that there are people who are masochistic enough to spend a year or two or three producing an excellent book that I will just burn through in 3-10 hours.
I should pay them and their publisher less than I might flip into the case of a subway busker?
Posted by: Deety at June 21, 2010 04:38 PM (aVzyR)
What a great world we're living in!!
Posted by: McLovin at June 21, 2010 04:42 PM (o+bH/)
Posted by: Bongo Fury! at June 21, 2010 04:42 PM (X67eL)
HOWEVER, I find that I am using it more because I discovered how many free books are available. Once in a while I download a 9..99 book, but most of the items in my library are Wodehouse, Austin, Chesterton, Christie, etc. It's given me a chance to catch up on books I haven't read in years, or classics I never got around to reading. I also like the fact that I can switch between two books without much trouble.
I still buy books with pictures, because Kindle is really only good for text and some black and white photos and diagrams. Garden books, photography books, art books, etc. are only good in the traditional format. I also like having books around for reference, and perhaps I am older I find it easier to go to a book and look something up than searching through the Kindle.
But for free books, Kindle is a great gadget! And I do take mine to the pool. I just make sure my chair is not too close to the water.
Posted by: Miss Marple (redneck teabagger) at June 21, 2010 04:53 PM (xxe/9)
Posted by: annoyamouse at June 21, 2010 05:07 PM (/IJLO)
I got an Astak Probook, it works pretty good. Most of what I read is the public domain stuff from Google Books.
You may want to wait for the Asus 950 ebook reader comes out (which should be real soon). It has a 9 in. display.
Posted by: Ken at June 21, 2010 05:52 PM (UdULD)
Posted by: megthered at June 21, 2010 06:01 PM (2POF0)
Posted by: Gandalf the whitey at June 21, 2010 06:52 PM (1Ap7+)
Posted by: Agmike at June 21, 2010 07:48 PM (PRpiv)
Try 1 you'll like it.
Posted by: Dave at June 21, 2010 08:02 PM (adOft)
I am thinking to buy Kindle, but 50% of my reading is in Russian and I don't know if I could load Russian book in pdf format on Kindle.
Posted by: redmonkey at June 22, 2010 05:04 AM (8K5j5)
The Kindle doesn't read epub, which was a turn-off for me (although it doesn't matter much given how well Calibre works), as well as the shenanigans Amazon has pulled with yanking back books. B&N hasn't been active enough to screw up like that yet.
I'm really surprised no one has mentioned using Calibre yet for managing their ebooks. It does ebook format conversions well too.
Posted by: Alice H at June 22, 2010 09:03 AM (qJHYy)
My comparison in 2 easy sentences: For 90% of what you'll be doing with it, either device will work and work well. I recommend the Kindle.
- The long version -
Advantage Kindle: 1) Better book selection, 2) hard keyboard, 3) better battery life, 4) faster turning pages, 5) thinner, 6) lighter, 7) portrait mode
Advantage Nook: 1) Cheaper books, 2) accepts more formats, 3) shopping from device is better, 4) better music player, 5) better web browser, 6) Can view book covers on touchscreen.
Posted by: Darkmage at June 22, 2010 09:11 AM (u1Awp)
Most of my books I get for free--first from the Baen site (first book in the series is free, kid!), then gutenberg.org (remember to check out the Canada and Australia sites!), and manybooks.net. If the Baen free library hasn't sated your thirst for exploding spaceships, google "Baen cd Joe Buckley" and you'll find lots more free stuff.
And yes, Calibre is wonderful.
Re screens that are bad for your eyes: I spend all damn day on the computer. When I was off for ten days, I barely turned it on--and my near vision had improved, in spite of having my e-reader grafted to my left hand. If you're reading e-books on your iPhone or iPad, happy squinting.
Posted by: delayna at June 24, 2010 06:34 AM (eR/ro)
Deca Sports 3 marks the first iteration of the series that takes advantage of the precision of the Wii Motion Plus peripheral to make the experience even more fun and easy to get into.
¡°Deca Sports 3 is a great way for families to spend time together in one wholesome,wholesale video games budget-conscious package,¡± said Dai Kudo, director of consumer products at Hudson Entertainment, which is the title's publisher.¡°The same familiar,psp 3000 accessories easy-to-use controls are back, allowing gamers of all ages to enjoy ten complete new sporting events, along with the addition of Wii MotionPlus,¡± the exec explained.
Deca Sports 3 will include ten different sporting event: springboard diving, volleyball, giant slalom, racquetball, air racing, kayak slalom, lacrosse, log cutting, half-pipe and fencing.A multiplayer component has been included, both with local and online features. Four players will be able to compete in each of these events in the same living room.
Online, however, things get more interesting. Teams can be formed and customized, allowing the users to choose the name, colors, emblem, style and attributes. Unfortunately, only four competitions are available through the internet: volleyball,wholesale sony ps3 lacrosse, racquetball and fencing.Deca Sports 3 will be launched on the Nintendo Wii on the 26th of October 2010 for the low price of 30 dollars. Hudson Entertainment is the outfit behind the current renditions of Bonk and, more importantly, Bomberman.
Posted by: HJS96 at August 30, 2010 07:18 PM (1DqfW)
The global manufacturer and exporter of thyristor, voltage regulator, automatic voltage stabilizer and power supplies.
Posted by: Solid State Relay at February 21, 2011 05:01 PM (lAAFE)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3158 seconds, 304 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: lorien1973 at June 21, 2010 11:39 AM (IhQuA)