May 23, 2010
— Monty Let's try a little gedankenexperiment:
Let us pretend that you are Joe Smith, a doughty yeoman of Geary, Oklahoma.
Joe runs a farm-implement-grain-and-feed business, and is the third of his ancestral line to do so. He is a member in good standing of the Better Business Bureau, the Rotary Club, and the Jaycees. He has attended the same church since he was baptized there as an infant. He is still married to the woman he married right out of high school; he has three kids, the oldest of whom has just turned twelve. He owns a house, two cars, a fishing boat. His bankbook shows the usual American middle-class balance sheet. He doesn't lose much sleep over whether he's a good person or a bad person, though if pressed he'd say that he was a good person. He doesn't think of himself as happy, necessarily, but he is; he is satisfied with his lot in life. He's done his best. An upright man. Things start to go wrong. The economy starts to go sour, for reasons Joe only vaguely understands. All he knows is that for all his hard work, for all his prudent investing and managing of his business, he is in real danger of going bankrupt. And a middle-aged man in Geary, Oklahoma with no job is in dire straits. There is no other way to put it. It is very late in life to start over, to retrain. And anyway: his wife's family lives in town, his children's friends, his friends, the schools, his church. The town is home. His family has lived here for a hundred years. The idea of being without support, without a livelihood, in so familiar and beloved a place is terrifying. The idea of having to uproot and move elsewhere is terrifying, almost impossible to contemplate. Yet in the longest hours of the night when he lies sleepless next to his wife, he must contemplate it.
Then a man comes by his place of business one day, a well-dressed man driving up in a late-model sedan with government plates. He steps up to the counter with a wink and a smile and asks you how Joe's doing. Joe says things are okay, becaus even though it's a lie he was taught to keep his personal problems to himself. The man shows an official-looking ID: Government Bureau of Wealth-Redistribution. Joe has never heard of such a thing, but the ID seems real enough.
The government man tells Joe that he understands Joe's troubles, and wishes to help. The government, he says, is simply taking over distressed properties, nationwide. Why, he'll even keep Joe on as the manager! Nothing would be any different! Joe would get paid the prevailing industry wage, as calculated by the statistics wonks in Washington D.C.; and get the same benefits as others who have been bought out. The government will handle all the inventory, all the returns, all the service calls, all the forecasting, all the profit and loss. All Joe needs to do is stand behind the counter and smile at his customers and pretend nothing has changed.
The government man lays a contract on the countertop and holds out a pen, smiling expectantly. The Faustian overtones of what is transpiring are not lost on Joe.
We will stop our gedankenexperiment here for the time being, with the government man holding out the pen and Joe Smith looking at it. It is a moment of decision, an axle upon which many things will turn.
What decision will Joe Smith make? We know his history, his background, and his situation. We know that many pressures weigh on Joe.
His family, first and foremost: his wife and children depend on him for both financial and physical support. Joe, of old Midwestern stock, still maintains the old-fashioned belief that a man is the head of the family and is responsible for their welfare. If he is without a job, he cannot provide for them. The house would have to be sold, and the boat, and one of the cars. The kids wouldn't get any spending money, and would get their schoolclothes from the donations box at the church instead of the J.C. Penney in Oklahoma City. It means pitying looks from the neighbors. It means, perhaps, leaving Geary altogether for a different town.
His employees: those who depend on him for their own livelihoods, and their own families. Some are friends, people he has known for many years. They have families and children just as he has; his choices burden them just as they do him.
The town: Geary is very small, and if his business fails, it might deal the town a mortal blow.
So. Does Joe sign?
We cannot look into the future any further than this suspended moment when the government man holds the pen out. Nothing is certain, no outcome is guaranteed. Catastrophe may follow either path, as may salvation. Regardless of the signature on the paper, the business might fail; or it might succeed. There is no way of telling.
We are left with only this moment in time.
The gedankenexperiment ends with Joe's decision, not with any later events. Everything important that's going to happen, will happen when the pen is accepted and the paper is signed; or when the pen is refused.
If I am to choose the outcome of this gedankenexperiment, I would tell the government man to take his pen and get the hell off the premises.
I choose to wager on my own ability, my own ingenuity, and my own effort. Mine, and that of my family and employees. I choose to shoulder the burden because I do not want charity from others -- sought or unsought. It might come to that, but not yet. To give in now would be an admission not of failure, but of fear.
Failure is not certain, but it is a possibility. Risk is a property of life, and only a fool thinks that risk can be banished entirely.
And even failure is not the end of the world. Perhaps the business simply is not viable any more. To prop it up with public money would be to admit that the whole thing is a sham, welfare money disguised as wages.
A man who fails is not necessarily a man defeated. Failure often begets strength and ingenuity. A successful man risks, in other words; he pits his own talents against the blind forces of fate, and wins more often than he loses. But it takes a strong man -- physically and morally -- to risk his own family along with himself.
Those who risk nothing gain nothing, but there are those for whom a zero-sum life is attractive. The timid man is just as afraid of success as he is of failure -- perhaps even more so. If failure is expected, if it is looked for, it becomes rather comforting to fail. No one expects any better, no one hopes for more. There is no pressure.
But a man who succeeds!
A successful man is always a target, a bright color in a monochrome world. A successful man is noticed. He causes the timid man to feel his limitations more acutely. A successful man in a roomful of mediocrities breeds resentment and fear rather than admiration.
A market-driven economy cannot function without people willing to risk failure, and to accept the consequences of those failures. Failure is just as essential to the process as success -- economists call it "creative destruction". If this process of creative destruction is choked off, the deadwood keeps building up until nothing new can grow.
If the gedankenexperiment seems too contrived, perhaps we can recontextualize it. Instead of a farm-implement-feed-and-grain company, let's say...oh...let's say that Joe Smith is the head of a major American auto-maker.
Does he sign?
Posted by: Monty at
04:55 AM
| Comments (171)
Post contains 1314 words, total size 7 kb.
i live in Virginia's 5th CD. Virginia's highest unemployment rate (about 20%) is found in one pocket of this district (Martinsville area).
On a conservative blog, we've all been bashing our Pelosi-enabling Congressman (who voted for Obamacare & Cap 'n Trade). One poster, Donna, was very conservative; decried the welfare state & the taxes that would be necessary to continue it.
One day, Donna posted that family or friends had just lost their job when a plant closed. Her comment was "what will they do for us?"
I cannot say if I wouldn't have the same attitude as Donna. But I do know that Bambi & Co. is thrilled that they can subject more of the public to government subsistence. Then they can make us all wards of the socialist state.
Posted by: kelley in virginia at May 23, 2010 05:11 AM (FTgRA)
Posted by: Scott J. at May 23, 2010 05:14 AM (+XUbm)
I just read that Bennett lost in the dem. primaries AFTER the Messaih endorsed him.
So, no more Bennett in Colorado. Read that this opponent took 60% of the dem. primary votes.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at May 23, 2010 05:17 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Jean at May 23, 2010 05:18 AM (CPefM)
It is one thing to expect your state government to help with job retraining, setting up a field office to process multiple hundreds of suddenly laid off workers, that sort of thing; it is another to demand that 4th or 5th generation layabouts receive benefits because it makes liberals feel all warm and fuzzy about themselves.
And it is just plain wrong to expect the federal government to get involved.
Posted by: Josef K. at May 23, 2010 05:18 AM (7+pP9)
The businessman is now supporting the Democrat incumbent Congressman. When pressed for a reason, why he is supporting a man who has voted for legislation and loudly proclaims positions which the businessman does not support, his answer was that his business is failing, if it goes under his family and all his employees will suffer. Tough situation as above.
The Democrat Congressman has offered the carrot of money, a contract from the Stimulus Bill funds. The stick is that there must be some Quid pro quo first. Nothing blatant or illegal but, well, you have to scratch his back first. It's just how things are done you know. Chicago rules and all that unspent "Obama money". Rinse, repeat, nationwide.
Posted by: geoffb at May 23, 2010 05:22 AM (d3wbb)
Posted by: Artruen at May 23, 2010 05:22 AM (L+dBi)
Posted by: Scott J. at May 23, 2010 05:23 AM (+XUbm)
Posted by: Pecos Bill at May 23, 2010 05:24 AM (8WOM0)
josef K: i am blessed to not be in a financial bind (as of today). So I don't know how I would react to the govt. devil with the big checkbook.
Posted by: kelley in virginia at May 23, 2010 05:24 AM (FTgRA)
The government which has nationalized his business due to the failure caused the failure to begin with.
You see, the thing that was designed to prevent the government from doing that was subverted and maligned through generations of attack by the same people in the government.
The third leg of the government which had usurped the power and authority to protect this safeguard had been subverted by the same people who wanted to see the safeguard destroyed.
The people sat back and allowed this to happen. Why? Because in their ignorance they thought that complete universal suffrage with no qualifications was a good thing, even as the founders did not.
So the plunderers voted themselves largess and appointed leaders to subvert the safeguards that prevented that.
In the end there can only be chaos and ruin.
Posted by: Vic at May 23, 2010 05:25 AM (6taRI)
Does he sign?
If he's the head of a major American auto-maker.
He was in on the scam, some years ago
Posted by: Beto at May 23, 2010 05:26 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Star-Spangled Beaner the anchor baby at May 23, 2010 05:26 AM (w9bVp)
Posted by: beerologist at May 23, 2010 05:27 AM (tgXx6)
Posted by: Newt Gingrich at May 23, 2010 05:28 AM (w9bVp)
I choose to wager on my own ability, my own ingenuity, and my own effort. Mine, and that of my family and employees.
I'd wager on that too. Except that the government is there to muck up the works with more restrictions, more rules, more roadblocks. Sign the paper. Get the hell out.
Posted by: kansas at May 23, 2010 05:28 AM (2kVkH)
we have a local very conservative businessman who is supporting the very lib freshman Congressman because of a promise of some tax breaks/incentives/deductions for bio-fuels. Naturally, any green legislation will destroy the economy, especially the economy of rural Virginia. But this businessman is looking at his business first.
if we don't elect conservatives now, we'll never have another chance.
Posted by: kelley in virginia at May 23, 2010 05:28 AM (FTgRA)
Bennett voted for the stimulus and for the health care "reform" disaster, huge tax-payer funded , deficit busting non-helpful spending measures. Then - like a good liar - Bennett's 30 second ad campaign states that he want's to stop all the "out of control Washington spending". OK. That doesn't past the laugh test.
Of course Andrew Romanoff (D) won't be any better. He'll campaign as a moderate and then, if elected, move sharply left as another reliable vote for tax increases, spending boondoggles, SEIU give-aways at tax-payer expense, etc...
Another stooge for Pelosi and Obama.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at May 23, 2010 05:28 AM (0fzsA)
A successful man is always a target, a bright color in a monochrome world. A successful man is noticed. He causes the timid man to feel his limitations more acutely. A successful man in a roomful of mediocrities breeds resentment and fear rather than admiration.
Reminds me of the old Neo-Tech ads:
The Traditional Cheater.....................The Neo-Tech Man
Stiff, nervous.................................... Relaxed, confident
...
Causes suspicion with cheating ..........Eliminates suspicion with moves
Fears all opponents............................Fears no one
...
Worries that his cheating will be seen...Knows that Neo-Tech cannot be
seen seen
...
Worries about the consequences.........Knows he cannot be caught
Posted by: geoff at May 23, 2010 05:29 AM (Mzo8t)
Posted by: ray at May 23, 2010 05:30 AM (9+P9E)
Posted by: kansas at May 23, 2010 05:30 AM (2kVkH)
It's all good,, I'm here to deliver you all from the clutches of greedy wall street. Now,, pull my finger and BOW YOUR HEADS!!!!
OsamaHusseinIslamObama 2012'
(the terrorist-Uighur-ACORN-media choice)
-It's never too early to campaign-
Posted by: Barry Soetoro (D-King OF The World!!) at May 23, 2010 05:31 AM (LsQiu)
Just watched Michael Steele stab Rand Paul in the back on FNS; thanks again to the country club squish Repukes that put this idiot in charge of the fucking party. Brilliant move.
O/T and since this is a Monty thread I have a book question: Any morons fans of Charles Stross? I just started reading Accelerando (at the advice of a non-moron Canuck) and it's pretty good so far.
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 23, 2010 05:31 AM (j9MWE)
Posted by: The Democrat party at May 23, 2010 05:32 AM (4XzsU)
uh oh that Bennett lost. the OFA, Organizing for America, that "volunteer" arm of the DNC (unemployed liberals & SEIU) had promised to target 2 November races to defend. One was Bennett's seat. The other is my freshman Dem Cong: Perriello 5th CD Va.
damn, i guess we'll have alot of purple shirted persons running around in very rural Virginia. ya think they'll stick out like sore thumbs?
Posted by: kelley in virginia at May 23, 2010 05:32 AM (FTgRA)
Posted by: Jane at May 23, 2010 05:32 AM (txvi6)
Posted by: Rosley at May 23, 2010 05:33 AM (HGmeP)
Its a happy government economy where no business prospers and none die either. Moral hazard is diffused through the entire economy to create a well-organized business community - like Lake Woebegone where everybody is above average.
Posted by: chuckR at May 23, 2010 05:34 AM (khYRZ)
Posted by: BigDaddy1964 at May 23, 2010 05:37 AM (V0Rgy)
30, possible marketing angle for Joe there.
Boldly announce he didn't sign. The freedom-minded would pick him over those competitors.
Then the question remains: do enough freedom-minded remain?
Posted by: Scott J. at May 23, 2010 05:38 AM (+XUbm)
1. first check is late - a paperwork snafu, fixed thru multiple phone calls and emails to Congressman
2. second check is late - Joe needs to switch to a paperless check request system run out a office 3000mi away.
3. third check shows up on time
4. fourth and subsequent "checks" show up as a government IOU valid for free cheese on third Thursday of month (Wisconsin has a more senior congress critter, so Geary loses out)
5. another envelope shows up, no check - 1099 form for all of the "income" to date, including the IOUs. On a cash basis Joe didn't even break even.
6. IRS issues tax lien, shuts down Joe's business
Posted by: Jean at May 23, 2010 05:38 AM (CPefM)
kelley in virginia: "One day, Donna posted that family or friends had
just lost their job when a plant closed. Her comment was 'what will
they do for us?'"
And then there's the whole Communist flavor to it all.
Other than that, it's a peachy path to take. "Donna" may be terribly nice and pleasant person, but I'm straining to see the devout conservatism. It would be more productive if she tore the government a new one for creating economic and legislative dynamics that punish private enterprise while trying to work with ex-employers/ees on what they might do collectively to make lemons out of lemonade.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 23, 2010 05:39 AM (swuwV)
A man with the steel-heeled boot crushing this windpipe is going to choose to have the boot step off his throat, or he'll die.
The government man won't just come with a contract and a pen, he'll also have a Kelo notice in his pocket. Because there is a farm-implement and feed business 3 towns over. If Joe doesn't sign, his business will be condemned in favor of the guy that did sign. He'll get 5 cents on the dollar for his inventory, minus the costs of paying the government to audit his books and steal his stuff.
Posted by: dusty at May 23, 2010 05:39 AM (j8aSQ)
Posted by: Jean at May 23, 2010 05:40 AM (CPefM)
He'll sign it because he's a fool, this character (and I realize it is a character) above any other should have at least 2 years supply to get his family through hard times. He say's he loves his family, that he's ready to protect and provide for them, and he is, just as soon as he buys a new boat!
He'll sign it because he's a coward. He really does believe his efforts are paramount and God's will counts for nothing.
He'll sign it because in the end, it's who he and his neighbors are. He's enjoyed his mortgage deduction welfare and school lunch welfare and his customers are all welfare pigs sucking on the farm subsidy tit.
Posted by: Eze at May 23, 2010 05:41 AM (/MdcO)
Let them burn.
Posted by: pep at May 23, 2010 05:41 AM (0K3p3)
the govt wants to get us all in the situation where we starve or go to jail unless we sign on with them.
anyone who does not believe that this is Bambi's goal has not been paying attention.
just yesterday at West Point, he said "international world order". yippee, he wants us to be just like Greece, Riwanda, North Korea.
Posted by: kelley in virginia at May 23, 2010 05:44 AM (FTgRA)
Posted by: Newt Gingrich at May 23, 2010 05:46 AM (w9bVp)
In yesterday's America? No. Today's? Yes. I imagine he would see either a) too little opportunity to succeed, or b) to much subsidy to bother making the effort.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 23, 2010 05:51 AM (swuwV)
And evolutionary theory calls it "trial and error".
It's interesting how liberals will scream bloody murder about how nothing but evolutionary theory can be taught in high school, and that it should be taught as an absolute "law of nature", but these same brain-dead, treasonous liberals have never met an evolutionary pressure they don't think they know better than. Liberals prefer stagnation to growth (as it's easier for their pea-brains to understand a stagnant world). They prefer centralized command and control to independent evolutionary structures.
Liberalism is stagnation, as every single leftist nation/society has been in the whole of recorded human history. Liberals are major errors in the trial and error of human evolution. They represent a dangerous infection of Western society (Western society, as pretty much no others have self-hating guilt-driven liberals as the West does) that will kill us - as is the liberal desire.
Sorry. I just had to get my little rant out about liberals claiming to be pro-evolutionary theory, when there is not a single liberal position that respects evolutionary pressure or the power of evolution. Evolution is one more example of liberals claiming to support something that they don't understand and detest, anyway. Frankly, liberals' views of evolution are much like liberals' views of themselves - they don't understand themselves and they detest who they are. At least, on the latter, I can agree with liberals. I detest them for being the despicable, lying, scumbag retards that they are.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 23, 2010 05:53 AM (Qp4DT)
Well, yes I did sign the document for the greater good, and for all the carping and complaining about General Motors becoming Government Motors, we have repaid the taxpayers most of their money.
Everything else you read and hear in the right-wing media is a lie. We are on-track to profitability, and will continue this unprecedented march to fiscal soundness without any help from the obstructionist Republicans. God save the King!
Posted by: Edward Whitacre, CEO, Gov Motors at May 23, 2010 05:57 AM (M5t+h)
Posted by: Monty at May 23, 2010 05:59 AM (O3eFQ)
Michael Steele really is a freaking idiot. I read what Rand Paul said, there wasn't a hint of racism. What Rand said was way above Steele's head.
Hey Michael: Wanna know why people don't give to the RNC ?? Because of idiotic statements like yours!
I'll give directly to the candidate Just donated $100 to Rand Paul. I will never give a cent to the RNC.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at May 23, 2010 06:03 AM (ACkhT)
Joe can't make his decision in a vacuum. There are other failing ag supply businesses. If the owners of those businesses sign up with the government devil, then they become protected from their own decisions. They no longer have to worry about making bad business choices. Joe is immediately at a disadvantage should he not sign on.
---------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Joe has to sign because Jane Smith in the next county signed, and Bill Smith in Nebraska signed, and a bunch of other Smiths all over the country have signed the paper.
When the govt controls the farm implement industry Joe has no choice but to sign.
Posted by: Mr. Slate at May 23, 2010 06:03 AM (b5sJf)
But wait, there's still hope because a grass roots movement is festering, Texas succeeds from the union and one by one, the Blue States succeed band together.
The new United State sets up a new Constitution, which is the same as the old Constitution except all the bastardization is stripped away...
Posted by: sTevo at May 23, 2010 06:05 AM (zIUsq)
In other words Joe (we) created this monster and fed it until it was so big it and powerful it could take over everything.
Posted by: Mr. Slate at May 23, 2010 06:06 AM (b5sJf)
Posted by: Phil Jones at May 23, 2010 06:13 AM (RROjn)
Posted by: Mr. Slate at May 23, 2010 10:08 AM (b5sJf)
I feel better with Steele on the other side.
I am truly disgusted at the reaction to Rand Paul's declaration that private citizens and private businesses have every right to do what they want. Most "conservatives" don't seem to understand or appreciate the ideas of freedom of association, nor the sacred importance of private property rights in order for ANYONE to have individual liberty. Of course, liberals are purely hostile towards both of those foundations of America, which is why they must be excised like the cancer they are.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 23, 2010 06:14 AM (Qp4DT)
O/T
I live in a gated community in Florida, and was just solicited by a Spanish speaking Jehovah Witness. She asked in Spanish did I speak the language and do any of my neighbors speak Spanish.
How did she get on the property? Her husband is a grass cutter, and she busies herself knocking doors while he works. Security has been notified, and she should be out on her ass within a few minutes.
Posted by: Fish at May 23, 2010 06:15 AM (M5t+h)
Posted by: pep at May 23, 2010 06:17 AM (0K3p3)
Imagine that I drop my trou and shove my arse against your face.
Do you kiss it or not?
Hint: Just like yours, mine is sophomoric drivel.
Posted by: Paul A'Barge at May 23, 2010 06:19 AM (scQai)
Then the question remains: do enough freedom-minded remain
Yes. and here's why: I was in the grocery checkout line, and there was a woman in front of me, with, I can only assume were her grandchilden. Food stamps in hand, she was trying to buy whole milk, and but could not. The kids were not on her 'program' In short, if the govt gives you food stamps, but tells what kind of milk you can buy?? Who among us would want that type of entitlement.?
I figure that 50% of us would not sign. Adaptation in business is the name of the game. In the end, success is measured by the # of people that trust you, not by the trust fund you're able to set aside for your children.
the other 5o% are probably taking some form of entitlement, and therefore don't give a rat's ass. 'Go with the game plan' is their motto. may they rot in hell
Posted by: pitchforksandpowder at May 23, 2010 06:19 AM (yf5QI)
It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement; and who, at worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.
Theodore Roosevelt, (April 23, 1910)Posted by: trailortrash at May 23, 2010 06:21 AM (5JiB+)
Posted by: Jeff at May 23, 2010 06:21 AM (7z1z2)
Even more so than in 2008 2010 is what I call a 'bite your tongue' election year.
But I realized a couple months ago that half the Republicans just don't care about winning and the other half have a silly and childish notion about playing 'fair' in politics and being honest about all candidates as if they had some civic duty sent from God.
Posted by: Mr. Slate at May 23, 2010 06:23 AM (b5sJf)
How did she get on the property? Her husband is a grass cutter, and she busies herself knocking doors while he works. Security has been notified, and she should be out on her ass within a few minutes.
oh good lord.
/places bet on whether they're documented, or not
Posted by: pitchforksandpowder at May 23, 2010 06:24 AM (yf5QI)
Posted by: eman at May 23, 2010 06:25 AM (hVdJG)
Joe: "Did anybody see you come in here?"
Government Man: "What?"
Joe: "Does anyone back at your office know where you are right this minute?"
Government Man: "I, uh, I don't know. Why do you ask?"
Joe: "So if the FBI comes in here asking me if I ever saw you I could say no, if he was coming here he didn't make it this far. Whoever killed him and chopped his body into little pieces must have been the last guy to sign his business away to him. It would be bearing false witness, but for making a deal with the likes of you it would be the punishment fitting the crime."
Government Man:
Joe:
Government Man:
Joe:
Government Man:
Joe:
Government Man: "So, does that mean you're not going to sign?"
Posted by: ak4mc at May 23, 2010 06:26 AM (56Glh)
/places bet on whether they're documented illegal, or not
Posted by: pitchforksandpowder at May 23, 2010 10:24 AM (yf5QI)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 23, 2010 06:26 AM (Qp4DT)
I like the way you think, young man. I reckon I'd like to make you President of this here Texamerica.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 23, 2010 06:27 AM (swuwV)
I made the mistake of watching MTP for a little while this morning. oh my God, what a bunch of whiners. I don't even get angry anymore, these people have no clue that America no longer trusts them and forget just not trusting them, they loathe them.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at May 23, 2010 06:30 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Jeff at May 23, 2010 06:31 AM (7z1z2)
If this decision is to be made on the basis of pure pragmatism then we'd need more information. What kind of cash reserves does Joe have to weather the financial storm? Are there nearby competitors also struggling who'd be interested in a partnership/co-op deal to pool resources and survive on their own? What do the wife & kids think? Are they on board with the idea? And if not, are they so adamantly refusing to move to another place should that be necessary? Are there no other job opportunities around town that are available that Joe and/or Mrs. Joe could take instead of selling out to the government?
But if it's a purely philosophical question, then if I'm Joe, then hell no I'm not signing.
But I'm kinda liking the third option: Sign the paper, but get an extra job doing something, anything else to support the family, and then take every single dime of the income from the government make-work job and donate it to the local shelter, soup kitchen, charity org. instead.
Or if I was feeling really mean, I'd take the money and donate it to Rand Paul.
Posted by: chemjeff at May 23, 2010 06:31 AM (Gk/wA)
Joe does not sign because, as in the case of Government Motors, Joe is publicly fired because he has "already made too much money".
The Government simply takes over and everyone in the town knows that Joe's business can no longer be trusted to provide quality service and products.
Customers drive to the next small town where a foreign company has set up shop to take on Joe's old customers.
Posted by: TXMarko at May 23, 2010 06:37 AM (2/a2b)
Posted by: eman at May 23, 2010 06:37 AM (hVdJG)
Let's play who wrote this:
I urge all of the Tea Partyers to follow Reagan, not Carter. If they want their movement to be more than a wave that crashes on the beach and then recedes back into the ocean, leaving nothing behind but empty sand, they should stop the "gloom talk." These are not the worst times we have ever faced, nor is the Constitution under serious threat.
Our economy is still the strongest and most resilient in the world. Our government is still capable of responding to the leadership of men and women who believe our problems can be solved. We must not follow the siren song of those who are in a frenzy of despair.
After all, we survived Jimmy Carter, didn't we?
========================
a) Michael Steele
b) David Brooks
c) Paul Begala
d) Sen. Bob Bennett
Posted by: Mr. Slate at May 23, 2010 06:39 AM (b5sJf)
Bob Bennett while the Hindenburg is burning: All is well. Nothing to see here. Move along.No need to shout 'fire!' and 'save us!' or any of those empty slogans.
Posted by: Mr. Slate at May 23, 2010 06:41 AM (b5sJf)
Posted by: eman at May 23, 2010 06:41 AM (hVdJG)
*I*would rather die. I can play out the scenario a hundred times, but the end will be the same. (Get the hell off my land and take your fucking pen with you.)
Will I judge Joe as a shit bird if he signs? Nah. But I will be able to look at myself in the mirror. Joe might not be able to, after he realizes he's been sold.
Posted by: DefendUSA at May 23, 2010 06:43 AM (yIwYC)
Posted by: Andy at May 23, 2010 06:45 AM (GguGs)
I'll spoil the surprise, but here goes. Whenever I am tempted to second guess a decision like that by the TPs to throw Bennett out, I am relieved to read something like this, because it confirms that the right decision was made. This putz wouldn't even exclude the possibility of running outside of the GOP, because he's just that important to the nation.
To all politicians, especially this year, here is advice to live by. If your career is more important to you than principles, then it's time for you to go. You are expendable.
The truly horrifying thing is that I have no difficulty imagining any of the listed options saying something like this, and three of them are nominal Republicans.
Posted by: pep at May 23, 2010 06:46 AM (0K3p3)
The trouble with you, Galt, is your damned speeches are too long.
Nobody is going to publish this novel, you know.
Posted by: comatus at May 23, 2010 06:47 AM (/VEEI)
Also unmentioned in the article was that Government Man from the Bureau of Wealth-Redistribution also provides all potential signees with an unopened tube of KY-Jelly to make the transition go smoothly.
Joe will be required to do the in-an-out, but it will be less painful with the Government supplied lubricant. He will also enjoy it as dictated by the bureaucrat from Washington Obamaland on the Potomac.
Posted by: Fish at May 23, 2010 06:48 AM (M5t+h)
Posted by: politicalmuse at May 23, 2010 06:48 AM (kLKnf)
Um, the Tea Partyers are following Reagan, not Carter. Both Reagan knew and the Tea Partyers' know the failings and trappings of an oppressive government that Carter did not. Furthermore, to recognize Carteresque doom-and-gloom is not to follow it but to know it to avoid it.
That speaker is incoherent and naive.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 23, 2010 06:48 AM (swuwV)
That's an interesting (i.e. retarded) metaphor that seems to advertise a serious lack of understanding of the Tea Party, waves, or sand.
What is "empty sand", anyway? It must be a Hah-vahd thing.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 23, 2010 06:51 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: pendejo grande at May 23, 2010 06:52 AM (ipxsa)
Posted by: Monty at May 23, 2010 06:55 AM (O3eFQ)
Dave
Posted by: LAWG at May 23, 2010 06:56 AM (ppVlj)
Posted by: Jesusland at May 23, 2010 06:56 AM (khPxz)
"His family has lived here for a hundred years. The idea of being without support, without a livelihood, in so familiar and beloved a place is terrifying. The idea of having to uproot and move elsewhere is terrifying, almost impossible to contemplate."
So, you're saying he's a pussy.
Another unoticed benefit of being from military family. No fear of moving.
Posted by: dagnymc at May 23, 2010 07:00 AM (U/WJo)
"Wo unto you poor men, ... whose hands are not stayed from laying hold upon other men's goods, whose eyes are full of greediness, and who will not labor with your own hands!"
-- Joe Smith, the Mormon prophet, Doctrine and Covenants 57:15-16.
Posted by: CM at May 23, 2010 07:02 AM (70pqs)
yeah, if anyone ANYONE would be the leader of today's Tea Party movement it would be Ronald Reagan.
The way he says, "Now so there will be no misunderstanding, it's not my intention to do away with government," it is like he's responding to the assholes today who keep regurgitating the canard that we want to get rid of the federal government.
Posted by: Mr. Slate at May 23, 2010 07:02 AM (b5sJf)
Wow, that was lame. Libertarian Story Time?
The only reason that Joe could possibly be going bankrupt is that he has too much debt.
Posted by: Never Mind at May 23, 2010 07:03 AM (et9Uc)
Posted by: Joseph Smith Mormon Prophet at May 23, 2010 07:04 AM (ADJFU)
So if Joe Smith thinks the government is the solution to his problems, he will sign the paper.
and that me friends is how we tie it all together and get back on topic
/bows
Posted by: Mr. Slate at May 23, 2010 07:07 AM (b5sJf)
The only reason that Joe could possibly be going bankrupt is that he has too much debt.
Posted by: Never Mind at May 23, 2010 11:03 AM (et9Uc)
Or possibly the inability to compete against Government Grain & Feed, a wholly owned subsidiary of the United Socialist States of America, and led by the competent and superbly efficient Chief Executive Officer, Rahm Emanuel.
Historically, we also know that Toyoto and Honda will never have the aforementioned problem. Or will we?
Posted by: Fish at May 23, 2010 07:09 AM (M5t+h)
Posted by: Monty at May 23, 2010 07:09 AM (O3eFQ)
Whoa, that hits VERY close to home in more ways than is safe to explain. Joe's decision is going to be very different than it would have been 30 years ago. And yes, that same offer might have come back then.
Kelley for President.
Posted by: Janie with a *** at May 23, 2010 07:10 AM (F8qDY)
Posted by: robtr at May 23, 2010 07:10 AM (fwSHf)
And they would have been spared the ultra-lib dreck, especially in the humanities, that passes for "higher-education". Everyone should be exposed to more than one viewpoint, but colleges have sadly become liberal indoctrination centers (with a few notable exceptions - and one can always find good educators even in the worst of schools).
The trade path would also be a hell of a lot cheaper than traditional college.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 23, 2010 07:11 AM (Acgmr)
Posted by: Jeff at May 23, 2010 07:11 AM (7z1z2)
Posted by: parisparamuss at May 23, 2010 07:11 AM (KZ5vg)
Hundreds of SEIU thugs showed up in buses,
Escorted by Washington D.C. police,
Shouting, "Death to Joe and his family!"
Posted by: Beto at May 23, 2010 07:16 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: eman at May 23, 2010 07:18 AM (hVdJG)
In this situation, I would sign. Simply because I wouldn't have the strength to put my family and this town that's counting on me through an uncertain future. It's the quick and easy path, but it's also one with more stability. Freedom is for the strong, and it takes strong people to be risk-takers.
Besides, any gov't offer with a smiley face is concealing a blade behind its back. If I don't take the offer, the gov't will just find some way to blackmail me into taking it or subsidize one of my competitors, driving me out in the process.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 23, 2010 07:18 AM (Acgmr)
Posted by: Tim winters at May 23, 2010 07:20 AM (WTRvw)
Nice imagery, but the gov't has the power of the printing press. Unlike the average businessman, the government can lie and hide its debt. In the end, it all comes crashing down into chaos, but for the meantime, the status quo continues.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 23, 2010 07:20 AM (Acgmr)
The only reason that Joe could possibly be going bankrupt is that he has too much debt.
Posted by: Never Mind at May 23, 2010 11:03 AM (et9Uc)
There are many sorts of continuing obligations other than debt. Even if one owns his house, outright, there is still property tax and maintenance, ...
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 23, 2010 07:21 AM (Qp4DT)
115,
*sigh*
Kratos, Kratos, Kratos.
I know. If it was just me, I'd tell the gov't man to go to hell.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 23, 2010 07:22 AM (Acgmr)
Posted by: eman at May 23, 2010 07:23 AM (hVdJG)
There are many sorts of continuing
obligations other than debt. Even if one owns his house, outright,
there is still property tax and maintenance, ...
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 23, 2010 11:21 AM (Qp4DT)
Of course, to correct myself (before someone else does) if one owns ones house, outright, then there is wealth that can be tapped to keep going a little longer, but my point was that one can go into bankruptcy just from not earning enough to cover standard maintenance costs of life, aside from business risks one takes (outside of debt) that can blow up in your face, and a litany of other circumstances. It's not all about debt, and debt is a very powerful and important tool for a modern society - for any society.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 23, 2010 07:24 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 23, 2010 11:20 AM (Acgmr)
Sometimes you have to take a stand. Especially when you know both options are likely to end badly.
Posted by: robtr at May 23, 2010 07:25 AM (fwSHf)
Yeah, the story is missing the part where the government bureaucrat tells Joe that he doesn't have to sign. However, being as how he didn't contribute to the Obama campaign, a legion of FDA, EPA and OSHA inspectors are due to arrive next week.
Meanwhile, his competetor who made a big contribution to Obama and the nearest Dem congressman just landed a big government contract and targetted tax break. Complete coincidence, of course.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 23, 2010 07:26 AM (plsiE)
By signing, I'm facilitating the necessary chaos as another poster here noted.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 23, 2010 07:26 AM (Acgmr)
Joe will calmly reach into his coat closet and grab his loaded shotgun. He'll smile thoughtfully as he cradles the shotgun in his arm, not aiming it at the government agent, but able to do so from its position in a split second. Then he'll announce in a clear, loud voice:
"Get off my land, you motherfucking government leech. This is still America! You have ten seconds . . ."
I love a happy ending.
Posted by: Sharkman at May 23, 2010 07:27 AM (Zj8fM)
Posted by: Monty at May 23, 2010 07:28 AM (O3eFQ)
Hundreds of SEIU thugs showed up in buses,
Escorted by Washington D.C. police,
Shouting, "Death to Joe and his family!"
Posted by: Beto at May 23, 2010 11:16 AM
Fixed.
Posted by: Nayif al Qaboomi at May 23, 2010 07:30 AM (Updet)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 23, 2010 07:30 AM (qSRHZ)
Agreed. I was answering the question under the specified conditions of this experiment.
If there wasn't a family involved, I'd gladly tell the gov't man to go straight to hell. "Get off my lawn!".
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 23, 2010 07:31 AM (Acgmr)
There are many sorts of continuing obligations other than debt.
After Government auditor's complete the task of analyzing all of Joe's ledgers, they find Joe has been woefully remiss in not compensating his employee's properly to Government suggested standards. After Government mandated adjustments to salary and benefits, Joe discovers the inability of feed and grain to remain a viable business.
Posted by: Fish at May 23, 2010 07:34 AM (M5t+h)
I once sold a four year old BMW to one of the original boat-people from Vietnam...He ran a landscaping business. This guy lost his country to communists and emigrated to a new foreign land. Within a decade or so he was driving a sporty BMW with money he earned in honest work...He followed the American ideal to the letter IMHO...Our pioneers who settled this great land were looking to escape Kings, an oppressive Church and their bureaucratic functionaries...They weren't too concerned that they didn't have a government man to take care of them. In point of fact, they were running from those types who had a strangle-hold on Europe...I think Joe Smith tells the government man to pack sand...
Posted by: Nozzle at May 23, 2010 07:39 AM (sE08M)
Posted by: AbeFroman at May 23, 2010 07:48 AM (kSYD3)
Posted by: Nozzle at May 23, 2010 11:39 AM (sE08M)
You're simply a conservative meanie who has no compassion for us little people. I've never had the opportunities enjoyed by conservatives because my father was a mechanic and never made over 100K a year.
We lived in a very small 3500 square foot home, drank Kool-Aid instead of wine, and were forced to smoke cheap bud instead of high quality sensimilla. I hate George Bush, Dick Cheney, and all the other Republican members of the Criminal Elite who fostered this terrible America on us members of the proletariat. Long live Obama the Savior!
Posted by: Fish at May 23, 2010 07:48 AM (M5t+h)
And, after chasing the government scumbag off his land, Joe will sit in his rocking chair re-reading Ender's Game (which was the book that got him reading in his youth), while waiting for the inevitable swarm of black-clad ATF agents to invade his farm, kill him, and haul his family off to the Obama re-education center.
Posted by: Sharkman at May 23, 2010 07:49 AM (Zj8fM)
Joe has an equipment, grain and feed store. He sells John Deere tractors and other farm equipment, plus he buys spare parts wholesale to retail to his farm customers.
Every year he has to use the credit line he has with the bank to renew his inventory of parts and equipment. Easily a half-million dollars. Priced a new combine lately? Maybe a million. Plus seed grain that he retails out. He's up to his neck in debt with DeKalb and Monsanto.
So his farmer customers are also having a hard time, and are not buying new parts, or replacing any equipment. He's sitting there with $750K in parts and equipment that are not moving, and he has to service that note on the loan. That's how most retail sales businesses work. Do you wonder why retail sales are in trouble, and there is so much empty commerical real estate?
It's not the boat in the driveway. It's everything he owns. The bank can sieze everything as a lien against the note. Maybe the bank he works with is a local outfit, and really likes Joe, and really wants to help, and is trying to restructure the note to help Joe. But they are probably up against it, too. Have you seen news of many banks failing in the past few years?
Joe doesn't sign this time, and politely says "No", but in the back of his mind, he wonders if he can weather the storm. If things get worse and the G-man comes back in August, will he sign. Stay tuned.
A regional example: National City Bank did not get any TARP money, but PNC Bank (of Pittsburgh) did. PNC bought National City last year. Thousands of National City employees are now out of work.
In other news, Ohio will be building gambling casinos.
Posted by: Reader CJ Burch says... at May 23, 2010 07:52 AM (sJTmU)
Posted by: eman at May 23, 2010 07:58 AM (hVdJG)
"So, you alone would never accept being a Government servant, but you would accept you and your family together being Government servants?" -eman
Serfdom. It's the new cool.
Posted by: Reader CJ Burch says... at May 23, 2010 08:07 AM (sJTmU)
I'm no stranger to Kelley's Virginia home around Martinsville, VA. The place has been in a depression for a long time now. To everybody else who woke up to one in October 2008, welcome to the party! I remember when Martinsville was bustling little town with a bright future, one whose main streets brimmed with the energy and vibrancy of commerce and hope. I was child then.
Then the textile mills went south, literally, after NAFTA. The once mighty furniture mills have wound up in China, and the duPont plant closed after union played a distrous game of chicken with the board and lost bigtime. Agriculture died, too. Every drive in the country took you through tobacco fields everywhere. It was possible to swing $4000 an acre in tobacco, making it really the only cash crop that could sustain the small farms there. All that went to hell, too.
Martinsville is now a shell of its former self, infested with chonic unemployment, crime, drugs, and public assistance. Out in the little surrounding towns everybody locks their doors now, which was unheard of 20 years ago, and they make sure to go check up on the little old ladies down the road if they're not heard from in while, just to see if they're safe and still have their stuff.
Of course, through all these unending years of hard times, we read about Wall Street investment banks who go through whole financial quarters, in the midst of depression, and never book one day of losses at the trading desk. That sems to me about as likely as the New York Yankees never losing a game for the season and it is a big tell that, "This game is rigged."
The Congresscrittter, Tom Perriello, is the one who made headlines here on this site for his supposed "honesty" wherein he revealed that "we [Congress] will keep stealing you blind until you stop us." He, of course, has managed to back that statement up so far with his voting record. He's new to the game, having stolen the last election from Virgil Goode in one of those deals where ballot boxes kept getting discovered in Charlotteville (very lib and very unlike the rest of the district) which of course were chocked full of Democrat ballots. Once again they kept recounting until the Dem was ahead and called it quits.
This is what has happened to our America. It's so overwhelming one hardly knows where to begin. But here's what I'm going to do today: go buy some sand at the hardware store, and use it to fill in some potholes in the county road that won't be filled up otherwise.
Posted by: Cowboy at May 23, 2010 08:12 AM (XYcTY)
Posted by: spongeworthy at May 23, 2010 08:30 AM (rplL3)
To liberals, "evolution" just means "LOL CHRISTIANS DUMB"
Posted by: the peanut gallery at May 23, 2010 08:38 AM (NurK6)
Posted by: Subotai Bahadur at May 23, 2010 08:49 AM (oBMGK)
Joe's in Oklahoma, right? So he was essentially relocated there by federal decree during a series of land rushes, and could have relocated at a profit to the Central Valley or Oregon or Washington the last time the Gummint Man came knockin'. Just about everybody took him up on that deal, and I don't see anybody here goddammin the ex-Okies who took that "little bit of help," made irrevocable the largest state water project/s since Babylon, and survived.
Joe serves farmers, right? Farmers working on a federally-regulated land allotment system, with dictated floor prices and subsidized year-to-year financing (there's a reason they call it "seed money"), sucked into existence by the clout of the Grange movement over 150 years ago, during the birthing pangs of homegrown American socialism.
I'm a libertarian. I'd like to live in a conservative republic someday, but I'm going into this with my eyes wide open: Joe is, and has always been, a socialist. So was his pappy, and his grand-daddy afore that. He's lived his whole life under a very patriotic, religious form of statism, proudly sends his kids to government schools where they are trained to be agents of the state, and couldn't consider for a moment getting by without the moment-by-moment intervention of his "bettors." He's about to get an attitude adjustment.
Posted by: comatus at May 23, 2010 09:25 AM (/VEEI)
A dozen employees lost their jobs and benefits. There is nothing more soul-crushing than having to tell people who depend on you to succeed that you're sorry, but you've failed. Little else is more humbling than to have to tell vendors that you've gone out of business and if they'll just be patient with you, you'll pay them back every cent you owe.
It took almost a year and every bit of money we could scrounge, but everyone got made whole. Everyone. The emotional consequences of failure last a lot longer, but eventually you come to the decision point, like Monty says.
Everyone gets knocked down. What do you do? You get up.
You. Get. Up.
I'm fortunate enough to have a mentor that's been where I have. The most heartening thing he told me was that if I wanted to be really successful, then I'd have to lose it all first, and aren't you glad that's out of the way?
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 23, 2010 09:44 AM (DMh1T)
That's why my kids never received an allowance. They might receive gifts, but most often they contracted with us to do tasks about the house. Teach kids that they get some money just for surviving another week and they lose the disconnect between working and getting paid for it.
And there's the next level of play: creating wealth. Something the grandfather of your hypothetical man understood, but not what our story's protagonist has demonstrated. The lessons of entrepreneurship and free-market capitalism are acutely known to the founder of a successful enterprise. They are passed along incompletely to his son. They are meaningless to the following generations.
Posted by: Steve Poling at May 23, 2010 09:49 AM (db5YN)
It will help bring the system crashing down that much faster. A disastrous outcome is inevitable at this point; the best thing we can do is go ahead and get it over with.
Posted by: Andy at May 23, 2010 10:45 AM (GguGs)
I agree with this view. The heroic self sacrifice involved in fighting (against what is now essentially inevitable) is very noble, and my heart leaps in joy to think of it. But really, how many Americans are willing to join up? As far as I can tell, a majority of Americans are doing what people have always done - they're looking out for number 1 and adapting to circumstances beyond their immediate control. That's why capitalist systems work - people make the best decisions they are capable of in their own best interests. They've been brainwashed by the public schools to be unpatriotic and unappreciative of our cultural heritage. I don't owe them my life or livelihood - I'm not interested in taking a bullet, economic or otherwise, for those who are not sympathetic to the cause of freedom to begin with. If my fellow Americans vote in leaders who create a scenario like the one Monty described, and do not repent of that decision, who am I to try to save them from themselves and breath a bit more life into a system that WILL fail? Hell - conservatives are held in contempt by a significant portion of the citizens of this land. Piss on 'em. Le the current stupid system fall and burn.
I care about me and mine, and will do what I can to maximize the wealth and security of me and mine.
Posted by: Reactionary at May 23, 2010 09:51 AM (4nbyM)
Now, as part of the thought experiment, let's look to the future. Where is Galt's Gulch going to be? We need to start putting it together.
Kulaks Unite!
Posted by: Penultimatum at May 23, 2010 10:07 AM (niydV)
Posted by: Noel at May 23, 2010 10:08 AM (Hh13R)
Posted by: B+rry Ob+owmao at May 23, 2010 10:27 AM (+7I8e)
Posted by: Noel at May 23, 2010 02:08 PM (Hh13R)
I'm one of the shaftholders....lost 100 shares@ $36. Plus it was in my IRA...ouch!
Posted by: torabora at May 23, 2010 10:29 AM (+7I8e)
Posted by: torabora at May 23, 2010 10:33 AM (+7I8e)
Posted by: David Pruett at May 23, 2010 10:34 AM (jUm2E)
I don't know what Joe says, but I do know what thew next generation will say, after they go through indoctrination through education in that generation.
Posted by: flashbazzbo, s.e. at May 23, 2010 10:40 AM (x7MwC)
That is, with some leeway for setting, how serfdom came about.
People unable to pay the taxes on their farms turned them over to local aristocrats in return for a guaranteed job as a sharecropper. Over time that evolved into the semi- or quasi-slavery that serfdom was.
Think BSG - "Everything that is happening has happened before and will happen again."
Posted by: Sam at May 23, 2010 11:16 AM (hvDIX)
He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.
Quite the choice. Choose "A" and your debts will be canceled, you'll have food on your table and you life will go on as it has in the past. Choose "B" and you'll be outside the system with no means to survive.
Posted by: rockhead at May 23, 2010 11:20 AM (RykTt)
Joe Smith's ancestors...those who first came to Geary, OK, with all they owned and their families in tow...who made the decision to leave some other place...some place where perhaps the Smith's had faced this great and awful choice before, and chose to risk it all, to leave the familiar and the comfortable, to start somewhere and something new...they were upright men and women.
Joe, to this point, sounds like he's followed in footsteps of upright men. That's nothing to be ashamed of.
But Joe, I'm not yet sure about.
Posted by: MostlyRight at May 23, 2010 11:39 AM (0aCXd)
Ok, and you be -- ummm -- Mary Nicoles, an outwardly shy but secretly curious librarian.
Oh wait, I thought this was our rollplaying night.
Posted by: Super Mario Cuomo at May 23, 2010 01:32 PM (m1Chw)
I think this goes hand in hand with the "dumbing down" of "education" that has been going on for the last 100+ years. (cf. John Taylor Gatto's Underground History of American Education and Dumbing Us Down)
Childhood has been deliberately pushed out further and further. The ultimate goal being that no one ever really grows up (i.e. "adults" who are perpetually looking for someone to take care of them).
Posted by: rockhead at May 23, 2010 02:42 PM (RykTt)
On the other hand, sexuality is being pushed DOWN the age spectrum, as can be seen on various horrifying (to this grandma) YouTube videos.
The result will be a bunch of hyper-sexualized early adolescents who will end up with STD's and pregnancies and need government help simply to exist.
Posted by: Miss Marple (redneck teabagger) at May 23, 2010 05:29 PM (xxe/9)
The line you wrote about a successful man standing out and breeding resentment and fear among the mediocrities, is exactly the reason the Arabs hate the isrealis so much. Think about it.
The Joooos get a little piece of desert 60 some years ago and turn it into something fabulous, all the time fighting for their very survival. Meanwhile the A-Rabs have been there for thousands of years and all they can do is have sex with 9 year old girls.
Posted by: martha at May 23, 2010 06:58 PM (kFsTd)
Posted by: Peter Warner at May 23, 2010 09:14 PM (DPQkC)
In the famous chapter called "The Grand Inquisitor."
Posted by: Beverly at May 23, 2010 09:24 PM (7UHbB)
Posted by: spandex zentai at May 24, 2010 03:29 AM (/GTAZ)
The Peoples Republic of Minnesota is filled with those who have taken the Devil's Deal. All the farmers are on the dole, as are most of the people up on the Iron Range. Minneapolis is filled to the brim with young idiot utopianists and welfare cases. The middle aged types over there are operating on throwing anyone off the sleigh in hopes the wolves won't catch up to them strategy. Good luck with that.
I can't afford to pull up stakes for another state just yet as the wife and I are just around the corner from our retirement home move at the moment, but you can bet we will never live here again (along with a long list of other socialist states).
Posted by: chuck in st paul at May 24, 2010 05:26 AM (adr25)
Posted by: Patton at May 24, 2010 06:09 AM (bQoya)
No, he doesn't sign. Why? Because of this clue to his character:
"He doesn't think of himself as happy, necessarily, but he is; he is satisfied with his lot in life. He's done his best. An upright man."
Joe won't sign because he's an American.
Posted by: Jaynie59 at May 25, 2010 05:16 AM (YjQWV)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2492 seconds, 299 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








[F]arm-implement-feed-and-grain company owner? Maybe, maybe not. CEO of a "Major American auto maker?' In a heartbeat. And then he'll go on TV to lie through his teeth about it.
Posted by: Josef K. at May 23, 2010 05:09 AM (7+pP9)