First tea bagger evah to vote for Obama.

Well if you don't count Barney and Anderson.

Three months before his suicide, surveillance agents sifted through trash Ivins left at his curb and discovered that the beleaguered scientist was disposing of pornographic magazines, fetish titles, and 15 pairs of stained women's panties.

Jeeze, what a great job fo' da G-men.

OK, we had some cute ones at Ole Miss, but damn, I don't get the Kappa Kappa Gamma fetish. The KD's and a couple of the DG's tended to be hotter anyway.

Oh, well, far be it for me to throw rocks at anyone else's kink as long as they aren't hurting anybody.

But wasn't there some hole in the theory that Ivins was the guilty party?

kinda like this group of teabaggers who went on an ideologically fueled killing spree

"Despite finding Dick Cheney "scary" and voting for Obama."

Since the literal meaning of "awesome" is "terrifying," I should point out that mine is an awesome God -- meaning, he's scary, but I still worship Him.  So as others have said, just finding Dick Cheney scary doesn't mean you don't love him.  (Although in this freakazoid's case, I am sure it means he hated Cheney.)

Dick Cheney scares lefties.

Joe Biden does not.

There is a lesson in there somewhere.

When an FBI lab analysis of the underwear showed that semen was detected on 14 of the garments

Did Andrew Sullivan change his name to "Garments"?

If the Patriot Act was so "unconstitutional", hows come the "constitutional scholar" Obama just extended it another year? 

Because he's brilliant and elegant and dreeeeeeamy and I justlikehimSOmuch and you just don't UNDERSTAND boohoohoohoohoo

Obama wasn't much of a scholar, PA.

What papers did he produce?

the kind you roll into joints.

Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 01, 2010 02:11 PM (z37MR)

Haven't heard - but the Lockerbie bomber is quite well, thank you.

39

The pact was a response to their fear of global warming.  How will the MSM spin them as teabaggers?

Posted by: Ben at March 01, 2010 02:18 PM (wuv1c)

Don't forget me.

the kind you roll into joints.

Posted by: Ben at March 01, 2010 02:18 PM (wuv1c)

Produced them from his pocket and then consumed them.  Pretty much that was his entire education in economics.

Dick Cheney stopped the tsunami with one stern look.

Sissy. I stopped a hurricane by raising my arms.

If the Patriot Act was so "unconstitutional", hows come the "constitutional scholar" Obama just extended it another year? 

I'm sure Keith Olbermann will call him on it, considering he flipped out when bush passed it.

I will be honest, Obama's actions are making easy to destroy the arguments of the liberals at family functions. All of the things they claimed bush did that made us a police state are not only being renewed by Obama, but at being enlarged.

Posted by: Christoph at March 01, 2010 02:17 PM (0fq7b)

Al Gore betrayed us!  He played on our fears!  And now his fearmongering has reached its natural (not logical) conclusion.

In unrelated news Jerimiah Wright has declared the killing of Able by Cain to be the first instance of a Tea Bagging murder.

Anyone want to make bets on how long it takes for shows like CSI, Law and Order, etc to have story lines in which Tea Partiers are murderers? 

Posted by: Christoph at March 01, 2010 02:22 PM (0fq7b)

The incredible unbalanced murderous people probably aren't going to be swayed by condemnation.  The borderline cases will be much more susceptible to condemnation.  But still probably not much.  Condemnate away, I think.

I will be honest, Obama's actions are making easy to destroy the arguments of the liberals at family functions. All of the things they claimed bush did that made us a police state are not only being renewed by Obama, but at being enlarged.

Posted by: Ben at March 01, 2010 02:20 PM (wuv1c)

Oh, like this?

But the big question confronting Mr. Obama is how he will describe the purpose of AmericaÂ’s nuclear arsenal. It is far more than just an academic debate.

Some leading Democrats, led by Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, have asked Mr. Obama to declare that the “sole purpose” of the country’s nuclear arsenal is to deter nuclear attack. “We’re under considerable pressure on this one within our own party,” one of Mr. Obama’s national security advisers said recently.

But inside the Pentagon and among many officials in the White House, Mr. Obama has been urged to retain more ambiguous wording — declaring that deterring nuclear attack is the primary purpose of the American arsenal, not the only one. That would leave open the option of using nuclear weapons against foes that might threaten the United States with biological or chemical weapons or transfer nuclear material to terrorists.

Any compromise wording that leaves in place elements of the Bush-era pre-emption policy, or suggests the United States could use nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear adversary, would disappoint many on the left wing of his party, and some arms control advocates.

“Any declaration that deterring a nuclear attack is a ‘primary purpose’ of our arsenal leaves open the possibility that there are other purposes, and it would not reflect any reduced reliance on nuclear weapons,” said Daryl G. Kimball, the executive director of the Arms Control Association. “It wouldn’t be consistent with what the president said in his speech in Prague” a year ago, when he laid out an ambitious vision for moving toward the elimination of nuclear weapons.

According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the White House will release a new health-care bill on Wednesday that will be "much smaller" than either the House or Senate versions, according to news reports.

The White House said that the new proposal will "borrow" ideas from last Thursday's health-care summit and will be designed to garner bipartisan support.

A senior administration official told Fox Obama's proposal will be introduced Wednesday.

According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the White House will release a new health-care bill on Wednesday that will be "much smaller" than either the House or Senate versions, according to news reports.

Hmmm....what does THAT mean?

"According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the White House will release a new health-care bill on Wednesday that will be "much smaller" than "

Goody.  Let's pass that one.  Oh?  Would take 60 votes in the Senate?

According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the White House will release a new health-care bill on Wednesday that will be "much smaller" than either the House or Senate versions, according to news reports.

Hmmm....what does THAT mean?

It means it will cost 899 billion instead of 900 billion.

"The Whitehouse will release another bill."

Oh, more bipartisanship.

"What papers did he produce?"

They look a lot like mine

According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the White House will release a new health-care bill on Wednesday that will be "much smaller" than either the House or Senate versions, according to news reports.

Knowing these geniuses, that just means it's STILL a 2700 page bill, but all the copies will be the size of one of those comic books that used to come in boxes of Cracker Jack. The type will be the size of pin points so that nobody will get confused by actually being able to read it. And that's the only copies that will be made available. That Nancy, what a brain!

Yes, he is a "teabagger" but not a "Tea Partier".

He sounds like the typical leftest loon who believes in AGW.  

When an FBI lab analysis of the underwear showed that semen was detected on 14 of the garments

Did alexthechick ever rush KKG?

"Did he use Keynesian economics to make his fortune? "

Yes, but we're talkin' Kenyans now.

Buffet is just protecting his own ass from administration retribution against his companies.  He was mildly critical of Obama maybe six months or so ago and got frozen out for it.   

I pine for the days of Andrew Carnegie, Henry Clay Frick and Andrew Mellon. When sucsessful capitalists were unashamed of their fortunes and when they gave away their own money to charity or the state and didn't force others to.  It's a shame there are not many industrialists of this mold left.

"Buffet is just protecting his own ass ..."

Buffet - Buff It

Just another hypocritical, leftist, (s)tool

According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the White House will release a new health-care bill on Wednesday that will be "much smaller" than either the House or Senate versions, according to news reports.

Knowing these geniuses, that just means it's STILL a 2700 page bill, but all the copies will be the size of one of those comic books that used to come in boxes of Cracker Jack. The type will be the size of pin points so that nobody will get confused by actually being able to read it. And that's the only copies that will be made available. That Nancy, what a brain!

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at March 01, 2010 02:33 PM (ERJIu)

Laser-inscribed onto a postage stamp, is my guess.  3,500 pages in a grid: 50 across, 70 down.

According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the White House will release a new health-care bill on Wednesday that will be "much smaller" than either the House or Senate versions, according to news reports.

Hmmm....what does THAT mean?

"Placeholder" language in the bill saves on page space. Not to mention, saving trees. It's a green bill!

The non-elected bureaucracy can add in the actual regulations later.

 It's a shame there are not many industrialists of this mold left.

Teddy Roosevelt made sufre there were no more of those pesky capitolists.  Remember what the media says; they were all "robber barrons" who amassed great fortunes by stealing from the "poor people".

In short, liberals all uniformly believe that the economy is a zero sum game.  This stupid mistake is why communism/socialism never works.

94  I believe so.

Speaking of perversities, what's going on with legislation vis a vis education and the safe schools czar is enough to curl one's nosehairs.  I've said it before, and I'll say it again: watch what happens in education (head start to college) while this healthcare debate goes on...and on (Friday the 13th version of Groundhog Day...whoever said that above, I like it!).

Posted by: Ben at March 01, 2010 02:49 PM (wuv1c)

I am sure that Carnegie, Frick and Mellon are all pretty darn moldy.

"...Mellon are all pretty darn moldy"

Melon.  Triple Lindy?  Awesome!

Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 01, 2010 02:45 PM (Y9NkI)

Buffett did say Obama should start over on health care.

Buffett urged Obama to say that “we're going to cut off all the kinds of things like the 800,000 special people in Florida or the Cornhusker kickback, as they called it, or the Louisiana Purchase, and we're going to — we're going to get rid of the nonsense. We're just going to focus on costs and we're not going to dream up 2,000 pages of other things. And I would say, as president, `I'm going to come back to you with something that's going to do something about this, because we have to do it.’”

Like Democrats in Congress, Buffett would like to expand access to health insurance, but he said he does not “believe in insuring more people till you attack the cost aspect of this.”

“If it was a choice today between plan A, which is what we've got, or plan B, what is in front of — the Senate bill, I would vote for the Senate bill,” Buffett said. “But I would much rather see a plan C that really attacks costs. And I think that's what the American public wants to see. I mean, the American public is not behind this bill. And we need the American public behind the bill, because it's going to have to do some tough things.”

Another government funded scientist that tampers with evidence?  The Hell, you say!

Somewhere there is a room in a home in search of an occupant.

Please give the room Warren Buffet's number.

(I subscribe to Nassim Taleb's theory about Buffett--sometimes you just get lucky.)

In a July 2008 e-mail, Ivins wrote that "Dick Cheney scares me. The Patriot Act is so unconstitutional it's not even funny." He added, "I'm voting for Obama!"

Good thing that Barry got rid of the Patriot Act. Oh wait....

"Good thing that Barry got rid of the Patriot Act."

Hey, goober!   That will be the second greatest accomplishment, of our administration.

"Good thing that Barry got rid of the Patriot Act. Oh wait...."

"Hey, goober!   That will be the second greatest accomplishment, of our administration."

In case there was any mistake.

Did Olberdouche have this fellas address?

He should...think of the fun they could have had together in that basement.

As creepy as this Ivins guy was, only FBI-level of incompetence could still point to him as the one and only anthrax suspect. Drive the guy to suicide then declare the case closed!

http://tinyurl.com/yhsk85u

So this is what it's come to. Anytime a heinous crime is committed, the motive of the perp must be be tied to a conservative person or theme. If the theme isn't apparent, "flood the zone" by a team of Democrats until one can be spun. All of the above takes priority over gathering objective evidence, convicting the gulty party, and doing what we can to see that the crime isn't repeated.

Is the next step not being allowed to charge or convict anyone who can convince Katie Couric that they are a registered Democrat, and that they support politically correct causes and politicians? 

In a July 2008 e-mail, Ivins wrote that "Dick Cheney scares me. The Patriot Act is so unconstitutional it's not even funny." He added, "I'm voting for Obama!"

Cheney should have called Ivins to let him know that his phone sex wasn't on the list of NSA priorities.

"Im sure he's smokin more than cigarettes"

I resent that teabagger allusion to cigars!  This time, I really am innocent.  MadCow, needs to speak for herself.