September 09, 2010
— Ace My God, it's full of pussy, as LauraW. said of me recently.
As much as I buy into the idea that we don't want to "enrage the Arab street" and put our boys' lives in elevated danger...
...we cannot keep matching each of the demands of expansionist, murderous Islam and giving it a special place as the de facto national religion, the single religion for which the legal penalty of blasphemy exists.
I should note that AP had no trouble whatsoever in running obviously-staged propaganda pictures of Burning Korans during the Israel-Lebanon war of 2006. Then, the picture was intended as an incitement of Muslims against the Israelis, and obviously was a Hezballah-approved propaganda shot.
But now? Nope, can't do that.
If a Muslim burns the Koran in order to blame it on Israelis and incite Muslims into warfare, run the shot.
If a Christian burns the Koran to make a point about Islam not in fact being this country's official, obligatory sate religion, don't run the shot.
Via JimmieBJR's twitter feed. He calls it "cowardly." I'm not sure there's another word for it.
On that point -- this very good (as usual) essay by Christopher Hitchens. There he notes we have demanded that every other religion be "domesticated," which, dogged metaphor aside, means that we have demanded that other religions fall into compliance with civil law -- even where (as with Christian Science) the illegal aspect of the religion is a truly important part of the religion.
And yet we don't similarly insist on this with Islam. Islam is apparently a special religion in that it trumps civil law.
Again, another badge of Islam's supremacy over other religions -- and all governments -- which is precisely what they're killing for.
Other people have remarked upon the perverse incentives here: If Christians want their faith taken seriously, and respected by institutions and the government, apparently they'll just have to start bombing and beheading and they'll have that.
Furthermore, we continue to encourage Islamist killers. Every time they kill, what message does the nation and its communicative institutions parrot over and over?
1) Islam is a religion of peace.
2) Islam is one of the world's "great religions."
3) The overwhelming majority of Islam's faithful are good, pious people.
Every time they murder in the name of Allah, then, we all collectively begin shouting how fucking wonderful Allah is.
Is it any surprise they continue to murder us then? They kill us, and we then proselytize on their behalf.
Posted by: Ace at
09:09 AM
| Comments (265)
Post contains 436 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 09:12 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Donna at September 09, 2010 09:14 AM (A77nn)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 09, 2010 09:14 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 09, 2010 09:14 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 09:14 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Moemo at September 09, 2010 09:15 AM (jYoCE)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 09, 2010 09:15 AM (5aa4z)
Afraid, wimpish, gutless spineless, weak, craven, faint-hearted, lily-livered and yellow-bellied also fit the bill.
Posted by: fixerupper at September 09, 2010 09:15 AM (J5Hcw)
Posted by: Anachronda at September 09, 2010 09:16 AM (NmR1a)
Video of 9-11? Burning Korans? Off limits.
It's amazing what is over the line for the MSM and what isn't.
Posted by: nickless at September 09, 2010 09:16 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at September 09, 2010 09:16 AM (HaYO4)
If he burns the damn books, it's only a matter of hours until Terry Jones is charged with a hate crime.
Posted by: mr boner?, mr boner?, paging mr boner? at September 09, 2010 09:16 AM (uFokq)
AP was the group that deliberately played up the atrocity in Falleujah. One of their editors stated that he hoped it would educate the US on feelings here.
Hey remember how people on this site likened book burnings to Nazism? How about pre-emptory news blackouts? Anyone here think that the Reich never did that?
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 09, 2010 09:17 AM (R2fpr)
Then put out the fire and say he just wanted to make sure people understood the Islamic faith and what motivated jihadists.
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 09, 2010 09:17 AM (bixjr)
...we cannot keep matching each of the demands of expansionist, murderous Islam and giving it a special place as the de facto national religion, the single religion for which the legal penalty of blasphemy exists.
Ace, you nailed it.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at September 09, 2010 09:17 AM (YVZlY)
That's fucking funny as hell on `roids.
(AP) had NO problems publishing the photos of Marine Lance Cpl. Joshua M. Bernard, 21, of New Portland, Maine last year as he lay dying on the battlefield from horrific wounds in A-stan ... even AFTER his family pleaded with them not to.
Posted by: Drillanwr at September 09, 2010 09:18 AM (1kwr2)
Posted by: Donna at September 09, 2010 09:18 AM (A77nn)
Posted by: negentropy at September 09, 2010 09:18 AM (27KAF)
Posted by: AP at September 09, 2010 09:19 AM (FcR7P)
In an effort to prevent the Muslim world from exploding into a violent rage over the burning of copies of the Koran, the AP is telling the world that people will set copies of the Koran on fire, but that the AP will not be showing images of the burning Korans, which will be set on fire and burned, which people are going to do to copies of the Koran.
I'll help the AP to keep this Koran-burning thing a secret by not telling anyone that people are going to set the Koran on fire.
Posted by: FireHorse at September 09, 2010 09:19 AM (sWynj)
Posted by: dogfish at September 09, 2010 09:19 AM (Ncv/n)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 09:19 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: MoJoTee at September 09, 2010 09:20 AM (uGBn8)
(1) The theme of the Diane Rehm Show (on NPR) this morning was the "frenzy" of anti-Muslim feeling abroad in the country. Really? Four supposedly serious people sat around discussing that myth--citing no evidence beyond Dove World Outreach.
(2) Why is it that everything Obama and company dislike is a bonanza for al Quaeda--Gitmo, Dove World Outreach, etc.--but not the GZM? I have heard no one persuasively address why a mosque at Ground Zero is not an incitement to more terrorism. The lesson seems quite simple to me: knock down some buildings, kill thousands of infidels, get a mosque. Whether that actually inspires anyone or not, it seems to me, is at least as likely as all the other scenarios cited by the Administration, the MFM, et al.
(3) Why is burning the Koran un-American but burning, oh, let's say, the American flag not?
(4) Pace to Gen. Petraeus, but should we really be fighting people who are so easily provoked. They are starting to seem to me more like children to be ignored than men to be taken seriously.
(5) And why the selective sensitivity? There have been numerous public incidents of desecration of the Catholic Eucharist in recent years--see, e.g., P.Z. Myers--a far graver crime in the eyes of Catholics--and not a peep from anyone in any position of authority. I'm really beginning to think that we're watching a subtle, creeping Islamization here. Our elites seem to be on-board at least with the anti-blasphemy aspects of Sharia. I've long been mystified by the central premise of Robert Ferrigno's Assassin novels--namely, that much of the U.S. converts to Islam after a nuclear attack--but now I'm starting to see the plausibility of it.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at September 09, 2010 09:21 AM (mAm+G)
Ummmm friendly reminder.....
Isnt this same press that published the GITMO photos.... the same press that ran with the Koran flushing fable...... the same press that published classified intelligence gathering operations..... the same press, Oh nevermind.
Lesson here is they're MORE than willing to inflame the Arab street when it suits their agenda,
Posted by: fixerupper at September 09, 2010 09:21 AM (J5Hcw)
Why did the press and TV jump on this? It's a very small church in Gainsville, Florida, not exactly a huge media market.
And have you noticed this is getting tied in pretty heavily to the mosque, and being covered almost extensively to the exclusion of the mosque?
And have you noticed that this pastor is pretty close to a certified lunatic?
Why is the media deliberately pushing a story designed to incite violence?
I think people need to look real carefully at what is being done.
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 09, 2010 09:21 AM (bixjr)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 09, 2010 09:22 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Hatless Hessian at September 09, 2010 09:23 AM (7r7wy)
Why did the press and TV jump on this? It's a very small church in Gainsville, Florida, not exactly a huge media market.
When they got there and were told that Tebow had left town, they had to cover something.
Posted by: FireHorse at September 09, 2010 09:23 AM (sWynj)
Posted by: phreshone at September 09, 2010 09:23 AM (1AnxB)
Remember when that cockscucker Kevin Sikes? was embeddded with a unit in Iraq and posted a video on boing boing of a soldier (Marine?) shooting some jihadi who supposedly surrendered?
The jihadists were notorious for either playing dead or booby trapping their dead.
Remember that?
Posted by: mr boner?, mr boner?, paging mr boner? at September 09, 2010 09:23 AM (uFokq)
Isnt this same press that published the GITMO photos.... the same press that ran with the Koran flushing fable...... the same press that published classified intelligence gathering operations..... the same press, Oh nevermind.
They don't have room on their servers for burning Koran photos. They'd have to delete several terrabytes of stock "Piss Christ" images.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 09, 2010 09:24 AM (5aa4z)
Yes! Yes!! Yes!!!
Posted by: Taliban R Us at September 09, 2010 09:24 AM (uNe7U)
Posted by: Hatless Hessian at September 09, 2010 09:24 AM (7r7wy)
I like how the AP equivocates this stunt with beheadings and heads on spikes.
Nancy Pelosi just called to say, "That's a bit of a stretch, don't you think?"
Posted by: BB at September 09, 2010 09:25 AM (qF8q3)
Posted by: fixerupper at September 09, 2010 09:25 AM (J5Hcw)
Why did the press and TV jump on this? It's a very small church in Gainsville, Florida, not exactly a huge media market.
And have you noticed this is getting tied in pretty heavily to the mosque, and being covered almost extensively to the exclusion of the mosque?
And have you noticed that this pastor is pretty close to a certified lunatic?
Why is the media deliberately pushing a story designed to incite violence?
I think people need to look real carefully at what is being done.
Posted by: Miss Marple
There's another association with the Phelps thugs. Nobody in the AP is boycotting footage of those thugs harrassing mourners at a funeral. If they do make note of it, it's an attempt to portray them as being representative of Christianity. Anybodu on record as saying that they have the right, but oficially condemning it? Why is it that biker clubes take more interest than anyone else?
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 09, 2010 09:25 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Andy at September 09, 2010 09:25 AM (5Rurq)
. . . he notes we have demanded that every other religion be "domesticated," which, dogged metaphor aside, means that we have demanded that other religions fall into compliance with civil law -- even where (as with Christian Science) the illegal aspect of the religion is a truly important part of the religion.
I remember Clinton trying to force Catholic teaching hospitals to teach abortion procedures. Did he ever cram that one through?
Posted by: Ed Anger at September 09, 2010 09:25 AM (7+pP9)
Pictures and video of civilians falling to their deaths on 9/11? Hell no!
(Fake) story about a Koran being flushed down a toilet at Club Gitmo? Check!
Danish cartoons about the Prophet? No way, Jose!
Oh, and forget about showing a cartoon image of Mohammed on a crappy-animated TV show. But they will show animated video of President Bush and Jesus being crapped on a few minutes later on that same TV show!
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 09, 2010 09:25 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: maddogg at September 09, 2010 09:26 AM (OlN4e)
That pastor certainly is a fame whore.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 09:26 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: 4thGenerationBuck at September 09, 2010 09:26 AM (XBpWs)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 09, 2010 09:26 AM (9hSKh)
The Boston Globe not only pushed the Abu Graib 'torture' story, they even went as far as publishing still-photos from prOn movies as scenes from Abu Graib.
Remember that?
Posted by: mr boner?, mr boner?, paging mr boner? at September 09, 2010 09:26 AM (uFokq)
He didn't try to "cram it through'". He merely tried to tamp it in with a cigar.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 09, 2010 09:27 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 09:27 AM (UOM48)
Tom Kent
Deputy Managing Editor for Standards and Production
Tom Kent is a deputy managing editor and standards editor of The Associated Press.
He served with the AP as correspondent in Sydney, Australia; correspondent for NATO and the European Union in Brussels; correspondent and bureau chief in Moscow; chief of AP operations in Iran during the Iranian revolution; deputy news editor and news editor of AP's World Service Division in New York; and international editor of the AP.
He has served twice as a juror for the Pulitzer Prizes in international reporting, and has been a board member of the Overseas Press Club of New York.
He was raised in Shaker Heights, Ohio, holds a degree in Russian and East European Studies from Yale University and speaks Russian, French and Spanish. He has taught at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism since 1996, and since 2001 at the Harriman Institute of Columbia's School of International and Public Affairs.
Tom is also a giant puss.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at September 09, 2010 09:28 AM (jBIxz)
If he burns the damn books, it's only a matter of hours until Terry Jones is charged with a hate crime.
I think you may be right. But since he's planning to do it on his property with his Qurans, it's going to be thin. As in anorexic. Luckily the US and Egypt have already proposed a "defamation (blasphemy) of religion (Islam)" resolution in the UN. Thus reversing GWB's position upholding the First Amendment. Moreover, international socialists transnational progressives favor international agreements over the US Constitution. So the usual, "it's just the UN" may not apply.
Jones to be the first test case?
Posted by: Beagle at September 09, 2010 09:28 AM (sOtz/)
6 Pretty much at this point it is our state religion. Our military is burning bibles now in Afghanistan, and our president is both demanding we shut up about the Ground Zero Mosque and that some goofball pastor not burn his private property.
Our military is burning Bibles = metaphorically or literally?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at September 09, 2010 09:28 AM (Yq+qN)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at September 09, 2010 09:29 AM (0EUPu)
Posted by: Captain Hate at September 09, 2010 09:29 AM (aIWP/)
Posted by: fayefaye at September 09, 2010 09:29 AM (u78ut)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 09, 2010 09:29 AM (0q2P7)
.... Religion of Peace.TM
Ironic juxtaposition. MFM never seems to notice.
Posted by: fixerupper at September 09, 2010 09:29 AM (J5Hcw)
If so -- burnt people, OK; burnt Koran, not OK.
That's nuts.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at September 09, 2010 09:29 AM (ZJ/un)
Posted by: Mike James at September 09, 2010 09:30 AM (k3VCR)
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at September 09, 2010 09:30 AM (YVZlY)
All this pussies are yours, use them together, use them in peace.
Except Uranus. Attempt no landing there.
Posted by: BB at September 09, 2010 09:31 AM (qF8q3)
Soldiers caught proselytizing and handing out Bibles.
Bibles seized, soldiers chastised.
Bibles disposed of.
Bibles burned with rest of daily trash.
So literally.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 09, 2010 09:31 AM (0q2P7)
Hell + handbasket. Some assembly required.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 09:31 AM (UOM48)
Meh..... Im sure Putin is going to give a rats ass about the Arab Street and Islamic sensitivities.
Posted by: fixerupper at September 09, 2010 09:32 AM (J5Hcw)
Literally
-----------
64
OT: Well don't that beat all.
Military Burns Unsolicited Bibles in Afghanistan.
Posted by: robtr at September 09, 2010 01:03 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 09, 2010 09:32 AM (FkKjr)
This is the same AP who issued a memorandum to its staff on how to write about the Ground Zero mosque instructing them on how its a) not a mosque, and b) not at Ground Zero.
And c) 9/11 never happened, and d) if it did happen, it was done by Christians.
Posted by: mr boner?, mr boner?, paging mr boner? at September 09, 2010 09:33 AM (uFokq)
All this pussies are yours, use them together, use them in peace.
Yeah, and "Let there be light."
(Sorry. I'm feeling a little left out in this thread.)
Posted by: Bomb #20 at September 09, 2010 09:33 AM (sWynj)
Mudville Gazette: AP is 'truly appalling' - http://tinyurl.com/ktv245
Posted by: Drillanwr at September 09, 2010 09:33 AM (1kwr2)
AP headline: U.S. military burns unsolicited bibles in Afghanistan. Baptists go on burning, killing rampage.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 09:34 AM (UOM48)
That pastor certainly is a fame flame whore.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 01:26 PM (UOM4
FIFY.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at September 09, 2010 09:34 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Captain Awesome at September 09, 2010 09:34 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Frothing Rage at September 09, 2010 09:35 AM (GvYeG)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 09, 2010 09:35 AM (DHNp4)
Breaking News:
A roadside bomb killed at least 10 people Thursday in Pakistan's restive northwest tribal region said officials.
The victims were traveling in a passenger van in a remote village in Kurram tribal district when their vehicle hit the buried explosive, wounding four others, according to authorities.
Posted by: Downscaled Upscale at September 09, 2010 01:34 PM (IhHdM)
Move along, nothing to see here.
Posted by: the religion of peace at September 09, 2010 09:35 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Timbo at September 09, 2010 09:36 AM (ph9vn)
strangely i'm un-moved by the new sensibilities of cnn. I found it bizzare that they would make a huge issue of a backwater pastor wanting attention during the mosque fiasco, guess it would have nothing to do with how they want some U.S citizens portrayed, Most f us have reiterated that the darned pastor has the right to do so. but it's rather silly.
I'm now not even offended by the Pastor being an opportunist ,as it seems He is.
He certainly showed again why we know Islam is Not a reliion of peace or particularly suited to the west and our freedoms. Although I srsly doubt the pastor really cared about the point.
cnn rarely seems to care the danger our men and women are in when they want to win political points for their team. Obama also didn't seem to mind when the Dems and He spoke belligerantly of our carpet bombing citizens and wedding parties, in a country we were fighting , after being attacked on 9-11 actually attacking regular citizens with that purpose. Gitmo still open,renditions still exist, other countries now included, I keep hoping the American people will wake up and realize the whole Hate Bush war monger was only for the political desire, to win seats and really meant to screw over Reps, did not matter at all, just a tool, a everything has been to them. Use anything, even our men and women in harms way.
cnn truly gth.
Posted by: willow at September 09, 2010 09:36 AM (/x2TR)
Aren't you thinking of the Mormons? Most of them gave up on having harems 100 odd years ago anyway.
Posted by: Lee Reynolds at September 09, 2010 09:36 AM (/gY4D)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 09, 2010 09:36 AM (DHNp4)
Ya know, the government's only role in this thing should be to ring the area with law enforcement officers to defend these dipshits while they engage in free speech. Obama should be impeached just for opening his fucking cocksucker.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 09, 2010 09:37 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: SurferDoc at September 09, 2010 09:37 AM (X6a9o)
Wait a second.... the constitution only says that the government will make no laws that buttinsky into religion. Which means that "freedom of religion" (unstated in the constitution) would necessarily fall under freedom of speech.
My, my... the implications.
Posted by: A. Rand at September 09, 2010 09:37 AM (gbCNS)
Why would anyone want to look at pictures of burning korans when they can take a video tour of my colon (coming in 3D soon!)
Posted by: Katie Couric's colon at September 09, 2010 09:37 AM (rMMMP)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 09, 2010 09:37 AM (DHNp4)
Sorry to go OT, but this is too good to pass up. Chris Christie slams yet another teacher. Epic:
If that link does not work, just click on my name - it will go to the same destination.
Posted by: Shane at September 09, 2010 09:39 AM (pkhHc)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 09, 2010 09:39 AM (DHNp4)
Sorry to go OT, but this is too good to pass up. Chris Christie slams yet another teacher.
How dare he. Did he not take into consideration the 'Educational street'? They're seething with resentment at such acts of teacherphobia.
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 09, 2010 09:41 AM (R2fpr)
I bet they did but no western reporter will say so.
Our own military is burning the bibles for them, for fear that the bibles could inflame tensions.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 09, 2010 09:42 AM (FkKjr)
Of course it does. Burn a Bible, get prayed for. Burn a Koran, get beheaded. Civilization has collapsed. The world is ruled by force. What's so difficult?
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 09, 2010 09:42 AM (5aa4z)
Actually, the Bible burning in this case was worse because that was actually to keep them out of the hands of people who might have been influenced by reading them. The Koran burning is purely symbolic.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at September 09, 2010 09:42 AM (mAm+G)
I bet they did but no western reporter will say so. There are no Bibles in the ME. We burned them for them already.
Posted by: Drillanwr at September 09, 2010 09:42 AM (1kwr2)
Or maybe this story is just the destraction of the day to keep us from noticing some other bad thing they are planning in the White House.
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 09, 2010 09:43 AM (bixjr)
One thing I'm certain of, the Russkies know how to speak to Mooselimbs in a language they understand. And the MFM will keep their fucking mouths shut about it for 2 reasons.
1. The Russians don't give a rat's ballsack what the MFM thinks.
2. The MFM, being in love with all totalitarian leftists, still fondly remember the Russkies as fellow travelers.
Posted by: maddogg at September 09, 2010 09:43 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Barry the Magnificent at September 09, 2010 09:44 AM (Ko04V)
Posted by: ingenus at September 09, 2010 09:44 AM (+sBB4)
First they burnt Beatles records and I didn't care because I liked the Stones.
Then they burned disco records and I didn't care because I'm not ghey.
Now they are burning korans, but I have plenty of toilet paper.
Wake me when they get to busty lesbian pron.
Posted by: Atomic Roach at September 09, 2010 09:45 AM (rMMMP)
But first, they (and the AP) will blow us!
(not blow us up....)
Posted by: America Gibson at September 09, 2010 09:45 AM (92zkk)
"The same thing Christians do when the Bible is burned - let it slide. Ignore it."
Well, why don't you try going to Saudi Arabia and burn the Koran there if you want to make a point?
"Because it's not possible to do it there. It's still possible to do it in America, where we have freedom of speech. That's the point."
Well, is this really the Christian thing to do?
"This is not a Christian outreach. This is a warning to radical Islamists that they have to respect our Constitution.
He elaborated on the dangers of Sharia law and how Europe was destroying itself by knuckling under to a totalitarian religion.
The host pointed out that Germany, Japan and Russia were totalitarian regimes ans we didn't bring them into the fold by stomping on their religions or cultures.
"Good point. We had to go to war against all these countries to halt their world domination plans. Dialogue doesn't work with these radical Islamists, either."
Sure, it's a stunt, but old boy was measured, rational and his logic was unassailable. Definitely not what I expected, which was a thick redneck accent thundering about the Hoor of Babylon.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 09, 2010 09:45 AM (ACkZp)
You guys remember the last episode of DEADWOOD when they 'had to' kill one of the whores to appease RICK SIMON?
How long until our own govt is 'sacrifing' joos and infidels to appease these monsters who should be living in caves?
Posted by: bonerwing plover at September 09, 2010 09:45 AM (uFokq)
Yessiree Bob. No problems here. Clear sailing.
Posted by: US Economy at September 09, 2010 09:45 AM (23kaI)
I mean, that seems like a reasonable compromise....
Posted by: jwpaine at September 09, 2010 09:46 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: Jean at September 09, 2010 09:46 AM (nOq8U)
Sorry to go OT, but this is too good to pass up. Chris Christie slams yet another teacher. Epic:
Oh... my, that was ORGASMIC. Good thing he goes the wrong way on abortion and the Ground Zero Mosque -- otherwise I'd have to drive to NJ and it would be Christie/pants zipper some disassembly required
Posted by: Filly at September 09, 2010 09:47 AM (UGUvN)
Especially when we're using them as kindling while we burn Margret Cho at the stake.
Posted by: Iblis at September 09, 2010 09:47 AM (9221z)
Then they burned disco records and I didn't care because I'm not ghey.
Now they are burning korans, but I have plenty of toilet paper.
Wake me when they get to busty lesbian pron.
Posted by: Atomic Roach
Surely, these are words of Moronic wisdom.
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 09, 2010 09:47 AM (R2fpr)
The 'stache is on with Megyn talking about the mosque issue.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 09:47 AM (UOM48)
Does he like gladiator movies? How up to date are his taxes? Any bastard children? How about cocks? Is he into cocks?
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 09, 2010 09:48 AM (5aa4z)
Especially when we're using them as kindling while we burn Margret Cho at the stake.
Man, that could take days.
Posted by: maddogg at September 09, 2010 09:48 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: AP Stylebook at September 09, 2010 09:48 AM (uNe7U)
"My God, it's full of pussy"
Where ever that place is, I want to visit it and I've now added it to my bucket list.
Posted by: conscious, but incohernet at September 09, 2010 09:49 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 09, 2010 09:49 AM (bixjr)
Posted by: pity t. fool at September 09, 2010 09:50 AM (BjQSh)
Especially when we're using them as kindling while we burn Margret Cho at the stake.
Man, that could take days.
I'd be disappointed if it didn't.
Posted by: Iblis at September 09, 2010 09:50 AM (9221z)
Posted by: a crying 5 year old at September 09, 2010 09:50 AM (YVZlY)
Damn, we need a flaming fat man for that.
Posted by: Mama AJ
Little known AoSHQ factoid: The flaming skulls employ Korans for fuel. Or was that Koreans? I'm confused.
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 09, 2010 09:50 AM (R2fpr)
Marinate her overnight in pig fat and kerosine first - she'll burn brighter and longer that way.
Posted by: Intrepid at September 09, 2010 09:50 AM (92zkk)
Posted by: . at September 09, 2010 09:50 AM (p302b)
Posted by: maddogg at September 09, 2010 09:50 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Team, Bacon Raconteur at September 09, 2010 09:51 AM (eCAn3)
If all this guy wants to do is make a point, why can't he make a pretend Koran and burn it in effegy?
It'd be the equivalent of a Middle Eastern demonstrator burning a homemade American flag (complete with 40 red stripes and 200 blue stars) like we see on the news.
Posted by: FireHorse at September 09, 2010 09:51 AM (sWynj)
Posted by: Pelosi at September 09, 2010 09:51 AM (+sBB4)
"Religion of Peace" is not, repeat not, something that Muslims say. They don't deny that Islam is a compete social system that covers all aspects of life including going to war.
The only people who say R.O.P. are non-Muslim apologists. And, the hell with them.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at September 09, 2010 09:51 AM (w41GQ)
The
cat is out of the bag and there is nothing we can do except delay the
inevitable. Burning books, especially a religious tome such as the
QuÂ’ran is detestable and repugnant but it is LEGAL in the U.S.A.To burn
any book or item as a political statement within local fire regulations.
Sure, we can Violate this individuals Constitutionally protected
right to do so in deference to the dictates of the largely illiterate
Muslim Masses world wide. But there will be copy cat QuÂ’ran burners and
the match will be lit any way regardless.
We should get out of Af-Pak A.S.A.P. Our brave warriors are
hamstrung by the R.O.E. that proscribe any hope of victory. Only the
guaranteed increase in flag draped coffins returning home for their last
trip. Under current conditions we are going to leave the country in
chaos no matter what strategy our Military has short of all out war. We
are fighting with rules that only Liberal anti-war academics can feel
comfortable with while they drink their Chablis and eat their Brie,
discussing the Socialist agenda they have planned for this great
Nation.
Face facts on the ground. These people will find any excuse to hate
us for all of our accomplishments.They are relentless in their
objectives and the will be no won “hearts and minds” no matter what we
do or say. This entire region used to have many Christian and Jewish
and Bahai, Hindu, Buddhist and other faiths living there but all have
left over the last 100 years due to persecution and taxation. The
Educated classes flee as soon as they can and all you have left is
people who only know one book, the QuÂ’ran. Their true colors come out
over an event like this.
Just as a drunk says what he is really thinking with out
inhibitions, those drunk with religious extremism express what they
really think when imbibed with these calls to hate from their Imams.
There is no current “solution”, only separation.
Best wishes to all.
Posted by: blog force one at September 09, 2010 09:51 AM (hjn1y)
Now I'm supposed to explain that to conservatives? Fucking Hell, people, grow a pair.
Jones is a brainless dumbshit, and if you think that statement violates the First Amendment, then so are you.
Could anything be more *desperately* ironic than someone claiming the right to be offensive and then expressing outrage that they're being criticized?
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at September 09, 2010 09:52 AM (bxiXv)
Of course, it would be lovely if the MFM decided to pay attention to things like the slaughter of Christians in the Muslim world. I'm not going to hold my breath.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 09, 2010 09:52 AM (IhJ5K)
Posted by: Your GOP betters at September 09, 2010 09:53 AM (Ko04V)
Did you guys see the "Obama for Caliph!" story?
No term limits, four wives, and booty (lots of booty).
Posted by: Beagle at September 09, 2010 09:53 AM (sOtz/)
Asked and answered.
140
Little known AoSHQ factoid: The flaming skulls employ Korans for fuel. Or was that Koreans? I'm confused.
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 09, 2010 01:50 PM (R2fpr)
141 "Especially when we're using them as kindling while we burn Margret Cho at the stake."
Posted by: Mama AJ at September 09, 2010 09:53 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 09, 2010 09:53 AM (ACkZp)
Hmm, I was just thinking pitch.
I think this Koran Burning thing is playing out just the way the preacher wants. The whole country is starting to see the hypocrisy of the way the elites and media suck muslim cock.
Posted by: Iblis at September 09, 2010 09:53 AM (9221z)
Posted by: a crying 5 year old at September 09, 2010 01:50 PM (YVZlY)
Okay, now, *that's* teh funneh.
Thanks.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at September 09, 2010 09:53 AM (bxiXv)
And you're a retard for criticizing him. It's his private property.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 09, 2010 09:54 AM (FkKjr)
I'm ready to burn some Korans myself.
Especially after seeing the picture of L Cpl Bernard that they insisted on showing.
red hued rage, warm the emptiness of my soul with your fires
Posted by: s'moron at September 09, 2010 09:54 AM (UaxA0)
Bolton would be popular with those racist teapartiers. He calls them like he sees them, and I appreciate his honesty and spine. He is the anti-politician.
Posted by: maddogg at September 09, 2010 09:55 AM (OlN4e)
Could anything be more *desperately* ironic than someone claiming the right to be offensive and then expressing outrage that they're being criticized?
Expressing outrage at being criticized is also protected by the First Amendment.
Posted by: FireHorse at September 09, 2010 09:55 AM (sWynj)
That's OK. The alternative media has been doing your job for many years now. At this point we fully expect you to do nothing but sit on the couch, drink beer, watch football, and consume oxygen. No no no don't go get the mail, we don't want the neighbors to see you like this with your full depends and your cheesy poof stained shirt. Hopefully you will slip into a diabetic comma soon so we can burn the couch and move on.
Posted by: John Galt at September 09, 2010 09:55 AM (F/4zf)
You guys remember the last episode of DEADWOOD when they 'had to' kill one of the whores to appease RICK SIMON?
How long until our own govt is 'sacrifing' joos and infidels to appease these monsters who should be living in caves?
Posted by: bonerwing plover
Sh-h-h-h-h-h!! That's O's October surprise!
Posted by: Drillanwr at September 09, 2010 09:56 AM (1kwr2)
Win-win.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 09:56 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz at September 09, 2010 09:56 AM (4JpPD)
Someone tell this to the City Council in Hartford, which has decided to have muslim opening prayers at its meeting. It's not like they have a huge muslim population or anything. they are doing it the same reason that town out in Oregon or Washington(i forget) is having a mexican independence day celebration paid for by the town, but they've never had one for July 4. Because they ruling class, or self styled elites know that it pissed people like us off. The best way to be elite is to take the EXACT opposite side of common sense or public opinion. I cannot think of any other explaination.
Why else would Gay groups (the political interest groups, not groups that are simply gay like the Dallas Cowboys) support Palistine or Iran? Or women's rights groups? It makes no sense. Why side with someone who would slit your throat?
Posted by: Ben at September 09, 2010 09:56 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jean at September 09, 2010 09:56 AM (bPCJG)
Frankly, I donÂ’t think the president, or Patreaus, should have addressed the proposed book burning at all. It makes us look weak and makes it look like the U.S. is giving special dispensation to Islam.
Every time there is something controversial done regarding christianity, does the President or other high-ranking american official apologize in advance? What about other offensive conduct? Particularly when this is such a small scale event – a tiny church with a handful of followers.
Our official reaction to this – before it even happens – signals that our national policy is that we are afraid of muslims and will do anything we can to avoid offending them. This is not the right policy at all. this actually reinforces to the muslim world that their policy of violence and threats of violence is working (I will not say “radical” as it is the mainstream muslim world we are at odds with – the “moderates” are the minority and therefore the radicals within islam)
This event should have been ignored by the President. Or, if asked about it, he should simply have said that Americans have the freedom of speech and left it at that.
In fact, to take this further, I started as being opposed to the koran burning as silly and offensive for no reason. I am now growing to support the koran burning because it is illustrating a number of important things:a) muslims are looking for an excuse to engage in violence; and
b) america is further down the path to dhimnitude than I even believed. Islam is being treated as above all other things – something that America as a whole must venerate and avoid giving offense to. So important that General Patreaus and President Obama must grovel to the muslim world in pre-apology for the act of some 30 citizens of a nation of 300+ million.
If I am caught on tape burning a koran tomorrow, will the President immediately give an interview condemning my action? Probably. I'm beginning to think we need to have a koran burning day where hundreds of korans are burned at hundreds of locations across the country, just to prove a point. I'm beginning to think that the nutty reverend is right. Just becasue he is a nut doesn't mean he can't be right about this.Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 09, 2010 09:56 AM (sOx93)
Muzzies: I will kill you for saying that.
AP: We will not report the muzzie response.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 09, 2010 09:57 AM (L8kaT)
Posted by: ingenus at September 09, 2010 09:57 AM (+sBB4)
OUR MILITARY is burning bibles in Afghanistan for Muslims there.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 09, 2010 09:57 AM (FkKjr)
Empire of Jeff at September 09, 2010 01:45 PM (ACkZp)
Muslims are burning bibles in the U.S. ? I did not know that.
Anyway, if someone decides they want to burn a bible or a flag in front of me, I guarantee you this Christian would not ignore it.
_______________________________________________________
Bible burning? Hell, entire church buildings get burned down.
Posted by: Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz at September 09, 2010 09:57 AM (4JpPD)
"The same thing Christians do when the Bible is burned - let it slide. Ignore it."
Empire of Jeff at September 09, 2010 01:45 PM (ACkZp)
Muslims are burning bibles in the U.S. ? I did not know that.
Anyway, if someone decides they want to burn a bible or a flag in front of me, I guarantee you this Christian would not ignore it.
Ace,
How about the fact that the Palistinians often desecrate the Church of the Nativity? We don't see the pope raising legions to invade when that happens, or telling his followers to kill them.
This isn't just a problem in America, this is a problem in all Western nations. By western I don't mean geographically, but simply liberal democracies.
Posted by: Ben at September 09, 2010 09:57 AM (wuv1c)
Sorry to go OT, but this is too good to pass up. Chris Christie slams yet another teacher. Epic:
HE is KICK ASS!
Posted by: Timbo at September 09, 2010 09:57 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 09, 2010 09:58 AM (ACkZp)
Islam is a religion of war. According to Muslims themselves.
G.W. Bush said what he thought he had to say. "Religion of peace" was a falsehood promoted by our handlers to manage us, not something promoted by Muslims themselves.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at September 09, 2010 09:58 AM (w41GQ)
Posted by: Drillanwr at September 09, 2010 09:58 AM (1kwr2)
Why else would Gay groups (the political interest groups, not groups that are simply gay like the Dallas Cowboys)
I lol'd. I did.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 09, 2010 09:58 AM (IhJ5K)
Enemy of my Enemy is my friend. Remember what the libtards want: The Destruction of the American Constitution and way of life. Then things get very clear very fast.
Posted by: Iblis at September 09, 2010 09:59 AM (9221z)
Frankly, I donÂ’t think the president, or Patreaus, should have addressed the proposed book burning at all. It makes us look weak and makes it look like the U.S. is giving special dispensation to Islam.
I was extremely bothered by Patreaus being involved. I just can't imagine a military leader ever saying this to ANYONE else.
Allah made a good point when this came out, would a general ever tell anti war protesters to stop protesting because the appearance of internal division over a war only emboldened the enemies and resulted in more troop deaths? Of course not.
I understand what this jackass is doing is stupid, but it bothers me that the military would get involved. The military needs to stay out of politics.
Posted by: Ben at September 09, 2010 10:00 AM (wuv1c)
Let me get this straight ...
Most Muslims are "moderates" ... (or so I'm told by my betters ...)
Burning Korans will cause some of these "moderate" Muslims to become radical Muslims ...
Is that about right ?
So all it takes to turn some "moderate" Muslims into radicals is to burn the Koran ...
Gee, I thought all it took was access to weapons and a proximity to Jews ...
Seems like some of those "moderate" Muslims are ready to go radical at any moment ... seems like the distance between being a moderate and a radical is pretty short ...
Posted by: Jeff at September 09, 2010 10:01 AM (A3tpD)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 10:01 AM (UOM48)
Oh I know it.
Posted by: Perry the Platapus at September 09, 2010 10:01 AM (9221z)
Posted by: ingenus at September 09, 2010 10:02 AM (+sBB4)
Religion of peace my ass.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 09, 2010 10:02 AM (UOM48)
Careful with the casserole talk - we don't want riots to erupt over chicken and broccoli -vs- squash and crushed ritz crackers. *shudders*
Posted by: Intrepid at September 09, 2010 10:02 AM (92zkk)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 09, 2010 10:02 AM (gmZ7Y)
Posted by: maddogg at September 09, 2010 10:03 AM (OlN4e)
This is a fair point. Churches have split over this matter.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 09, 2010 10:03 AM (IhJ5K)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 09, 2010 10:04 AM (gmZ7Y)
We must burn the koran
Burn it I say,
Burn it all night
Burn it all day
Burn it with candles
Burn it with glasses
Burn it with gas
From farting pig's asses
Then take a look
Please show me, please
Where o where
Is the Religion of Peace?
Posted by: Dr StrangeZuess at September 09, 2010 10:05 AM (rMMMP)
They're arguing that the church shouldn't do this because people will be violent. At best, it's blackmail. At worst, it's terrorism.
Could anything be more *desperately* ironic than someone claiming the right to be offensive and then expressing outrage that they're being criticized?
I don't think Jones is expressing outrage that he's being criticized. Indeed, he expected it, that's the whole purpose of the stunt.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 09, 2010 10:05 AM (T0NGe)
I posted this little piece of love and tolerance in another threads comments:
Screw this shit. It's time to raise the cover change for this little party, they want to bitch and cry about something....NUKE MECCA then Tehran cause they will have the bomb soon and they will use it, and then Pakistan just because. These people are not going to stop until they have killed or conquered us so why wait.
The time has come for us to grow a pair and put an end to this bullshit once and for all.. We should have done this along time ago but Carter was too much of a pussy and those that followed him took thier eye off the ball.
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at September 09, 2010 10:06 AM (OefT/)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 09, 2010 10:08 AM (L8kaT)
Posted by: Sponge at September 09, 2010 10:09 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: maddogg at September 09, 2010 10:09 AM (OlN4e)
Yeah, just like when they fire their weapons into the air, not even contemplating the injuries/deaths that might occur when the rounds fall from the sky. No wonder there have been so few Nobel prizes for physics awarded to Muzzies....
Posted by: Intrepid at September 09, 2010 10:10 AM (92zkk)
Why wouldn't any of the Traitor-in-Chief's co-conspirators "talk to" Imam Rauf, and tell him that what he is trying to do might cause "unrest" in the U.S.A.?
Simple. The Muzzies -- including the Muslim Mouthpiece -- are banking on the basic decency of Americans. And, sad to say, the laziness of Americans too long lost in the fog of freedom without responsibility.
If Barry Soetoro wants to do something right (impossible, I know), he will place two calls, one to "pastor" Jones and one to Rauf, telling both to change their plans.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 09, 2010 10:10 AM (Ulu3i)
I was extremely bothered by Patreaus being involved. I just can't imagine a military leader ever saying this to ANYONE else.
Allah made a good point when this came out, would a general ever tell anti war protesters to stop protesting because the appearance of internal division over a war only emboldened the enemies and resulted in more troop deaths? Of course not.
I agree.
What about the whole gay "marriage" and DADT debates? Muslims kill homosexuals over there. You can bet Obama doesn't care if a picture of two men in lip lock getting hitched is broadcast throughout the world. Or that it may incite violence against our troops.
Posted by: Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz at September 09, 2010 10:15 AM (4JpPD)
I just saw Gibbs on TV. Talk about giving this Jones guy everything he wants. He's got the world by a string right now.
Posted by: Lincolntf
Forget the Korans. he should wipe his ass with the imperial decree form the Dear Leader. Then he can hold a contest to stack the Korans into interesting shapes, like playhouses for kids, and superglue them together. They're unburnt, which is more than can be said about those bibles in US military custody, unflushed, and providing a service making little kiddies happy.
That should be a win/ win thing right? Maybe he could do it at 'not-quite' ground zero, since it supposedly doesn't matter.
P.S. This pastor can add himself to the list of people who have taken the nickel tour and temporary lodgings inside Obama's cranium.
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 09, 2010 10:15 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Intrepid at September 09, 2010 02:02 PM (92zkk)
Don't forget about me!
Posted by: token green jello salad at September 09, 2010 10:15 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 09, 2010 02:10 PM (Ulu3i)
Exactly. This willingness to tolerate abuse is a weakness we can no longer afford. The idea of America turning out like Europe is sickening.
Posted by: Reactionary at September 09, 2010 10:15 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Drillanwr at September 09, 2010 10:16 AM (1kwr2)
You can bet Obama doesn't care if a picture of two men in lip lock getting hitched is broadcast throughout the world.
Well, as long as I'm not one of them.........
Posted by: Barack 'Do These Khakis Make My Package Look Delicious' Obama at September 09, 2010 10:17 AM (ERJIu)
Posted by: . at September 09, 2010 10:18 AM (p302b)
Part of me thinks the libs want this, then they'd have their excuse to crack down on all Christians and conservative leaning religions.
Posted by: Iblis at September 09, 2010 10:18 AM (9221z)
To these assholes, the world is Peaksville and islam is Anthony Fremont.
"It's a good thing that you want that mosque at ground zero, islam. Very good."
"It's wrong that they want to hurt your favorite book, islam. Very wrong. You did good to threaten retaliation. Very good."
What they don't understand is that, sooner or later, little Anthony will wish us all into the cornfield.
Posted by: TiredWench at September 09, 2010 10:21 AM (oPceJ)
The poor congregation of the Orthodox church that WAS ALREADY at ground zero have been trying for years to get permission from bloomberg and all the minions to just rebuild their church and they have gotten no where. People, knowing about this are pretty pissed that bloomie greased the skids for 9/11 mosque boy and yet has trounced the church folk at every turn. My God, nyers are actually beginning to wonder if bloomie is anti christian. out loud.
Posted by: . at September 09, 2010 10:22 AM (p302b)
You know, the more I'm told that Burn a Koran Day is a bad idea, the more I'm comfortable with it. Partly, it's the people telling me it is a bad idea. Partly, it is the reasons they are claiming it is a a bad idea. And partly it is the inconsistency of the reasons provided by the people.
In short, the people telling me this is bad are the people who I think "fuck you" every time they open their mouth.
And the Koran burning does very noticeably put to lie the "religion of peace." I have no respect for the lunatic ravings of a child-molesting warmonger, or any of his petulant, backwards disciples.
That was all stream of consciousness-y. I apologize. It's weird. I've never had anything except disgust for book-burning or book-burners, but I suppose I dislike the Islamic apologists more.
Posted by: shillelagh at September 09, 2010 10:23 AM (Oz4Bj)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 09, 2010 10:23 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Jean at September 09, 2010 10:24 AM (THrql)
Posted by: . at September 09, 2010 10:24 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Iblis at September 09, 2010 02:18 PM (9221z)
They'd better hope, for their own sakes, that they never push it that far.
Posted by: Reactionary at September 09, 2010 10:26 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Jean at September 09, 2010 10:26 AM (UqSuH)
The poor congregation of the Orthodox church that WAS ALREADY at ground zero have been trying for years to get permission from bloomberg and all the minions to just rebuild their church and they have gotten no where. People, knowing about this are pretty pissed that bloomie greased the skids for 9/11 mosque boy and yet has trounced the church folk at every turn. My God, nyers are actually beginning to wonder if bloomie is anti christian. out loud.
Posted by: . at September 09, 2010 02:22 PM (p302b)
I've posted about this over at ABCNews, in their articles about the mosque and it mysteriously disappears.
Posted by: Iblis at September 09, 2010 10:27 AM (9221z)
Posted by: Some Say the Strawmarian at September 09, 2010 10:28 AM (mHQ7T)
Fixed.
Posted by: 13times at September 09, 2010 10:30 AM (h6XiD)
Are you asking us, infidel?
Posted by: Radical Muslims at September 09, 2010 10:30 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 09, 2010 10:31 AM (CpbMn)
Are they really? My husband was perplexed by the latest Holocaust / Ground Zero mosque issue of New York magazine. Maybe New Yorkers are starting to wonder about the Mayor, who told the emotional story of how his parents went through their Christian lawyer as a front when moving into their WASP-y MA neighborhood. That set off a bell for me.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 09, 2010 10:33 AM (mHQ7T)
Apparently, we do, since our military is burning bibles so they won't be offended.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 09, 2010 10:35 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 09, 2010 10:36 AM (gmZ7Y)
Ha! I got into that fight on a thread about Meghan McCain's new book. Leno snarked you could slide it under the door, if you forgot to order your copy. So, some stupid troll was saying that lots of literary masterpieces were under 200 pages... Old Man and the Sea, Death in Venice, The Great Gatsby.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 09, 2010 10:37 AM (mHQ7T)
The comment is usually made in connection with the phrase "something told me that a third term wasn't a good idea and that the law was put there for a reason, I shouldn't have been so complacent"....
lot of guilty nyer's about this third term.....it seems mike has had a complete personality change...
it's the power
Posted by: . at September 09, 2010 10:37 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 09, 2010 02:31 PM (CpbMn)
Well said. I've a few titles in mind that can go on the pyre. There is nothing redeeming in the Koran. Nothing to suggest it should not be put to the torch. If this merry bon fire moves up the schedule for our final show down with the muslims, so much the better.
Of course, the American public schools are working day and night to make sure our kids can't read ANY books, so eventually the book burning will no longer be worth doing.
Posted by: Reactionary at September 09, 2010 10:38 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: RushBabe at September 09, 2010 10:39 AM (a3Z62)
Posted by: Moi at September 09, 2010 10:39 AM (Ez4Ql)
But, I wonder if he has unwittingly (or mad genius-style) created a little army of book burners around the country to do it for him.
I was just thinking that very thing. I may have my own private Koran burning on Saturday.
Posted by: jewells at September 09, 2010 10:39 AM (l/N7H)
I have noticed threads on several blogs I read, not just political sites, asking if you are planning to burn said book. fascinating answers they are getting.
Posted by: . at September 09, 2010 10:41 AM (p302b)
Whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also. [Matthew 5:39]
Uh... hey Christians... what happens when they then hit you on the other cheek??? You are kinda out of cheeks.... so can you pull ou the Holy Handgrenade of Antioch then?
Cause folks... we are out of cheeks here...
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 09, 2010 10:49 AM (H+oXM)
well you know benny's not a light weight..
he could always opt to repeat history
Posted by: . at September 09, 2010 10:53 AM (p302b)
Posted by: . at September 09, 2010 10:57 AM (p302b)
226 - polynikes
I'm not so sure, that's my problem. It really is a conflict of values I haven't worked over to my satisfaction. Like I said, I find no value in Islam. Even if in theory it was an OK religion, in practice, every place it dominates is a shithole. I always predicated my distaste for book-burning on (what I thought of) as the classical liberal idea that all ideas should enjoy debate in the public sphere and that book-burning was a debate-suppressant.
These days, I'm more inclined to demand that things, people, ideas, etc. prove their value before I just freely assume they have value (but everything needs to get a fair shake in proving itself) i.e. Objectivist. The Koran even asks me to give it value in spite of serious evidence that it in fact has negative value. If something has no value, I can't justify caring what happens to it. If something has negative value, I can't condemn removing it. I know this is all terribly epistemically immodest, but I also don't think I should try to act as a rational being only to throw my conclusions to the wind because everything deserves to have value. If it deserves value, earn it! If it can't, then it has no value.
Posted by: shillelagh at September 09, 2010 11:02 AM (Oz4Bj)
Posted by: Moohamed with a bloody nose at September 09, 2010 11:03 AM (o1GYd)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at September 09, 2010 11:04 AM (cD/5o)
Posted by: Randy at September 09, 2010 11:05 AM (zQKSr)
That explains it. Too many drugs in Coventry while his brain was still developing. Now, Kucinich is his Congressman back home.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 09, 2010 11:06 AM (mHQ7T)
We now continue with our regularly scheduled appeasment of Islam, stay tuned until 2018 when we have a couple of smoking radioactive craters where NYC and D.C. used to be, then Americans will give themselves permission to actually treat Islam the way it is begging for us to treat it. Until then remember ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE!!!
Posted by: Jehu at September 09, 2010 11:10 AM (sCJZb)
The alternative was Democratic candidate Bill Thompson. Bloomberg pushes this Independent, buck the status quo thing, though it came out later he made a deal to support the KSM trials downtown, if Obama wouldn't stump for his opponent. Giuliani once endorsed Bloomberg, who ran as a Republican in his first term. The state GOP in NY is a total disaster. The Democrats have been working up Bloomberg for a while.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 09, 2010 11:12 AM (mHQ7T)
I heard some DJs on a Canadian show reading The Sun on air, and they said Russians have a time machine and predicted US currency would have Arabic on it by 2025.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 09, 2010 11:14 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Frothing Rage at September 09, 2010 11:23 AM (GvYeG)
General P has gone native whether through Stockholm Syndrome, executive order, or choice.
Posted by: Islamic rage Boy at September 09, 2010 11:27 AM (kq1lG)
All book burning is bad.
Is freeing up memory on a Kindle akin to burning an actual book?
Why can't the protesters in Florida just download the Koran and then hold their data cards in front of a magnet?
Posted by: FireHorse at September 09, 2010 11:29 AM (sWynj)
OT:
Just saw at Diana West's website: the judge in the military/birth certificate case said due to "embarrassment" to Obama which might be caused by production it will not be allowed or requested.
Yes, embarrassment.
Also, she has the US military Quran regs. Gloves, respect, yadda, yadda.
Islam is our de facto established religion. From NASA to State to Gitmo to DHS meeting with (if not hiring) all the Ikhwan spokesliars.
Posted by: Beagle at September 09, 2010 11:29 AM (sOtz/)
All book burning is bad.
Is freeing up memory on a Kindle akin to burning an actual book?
Why can't the protesters in Florida just download the Koran and then hold their data cards in front of a magnet?
Posted by: FireHorse
Winner of the thread and of the day.
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 09, 2010 11:37 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 09, 2010 11:38 AM (kq1lG)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 09, 2010 11:52 AM (5ujiq)
Posted by: Conservative Phantom at September 09, 2010 12:20 PM (rPEr/)
Asking her to say that Mecca should be open to non-muslims (she won't) and asking her to condemn Hamas (she won't).
Posted by: blindside at September 09, 2010 12:43 PM (x7g7t)
Posted by: chillin the most at September 09, 2010 01:20 PM (6IV8T)
Since I asked you first, do you think we should be criticizing them or as I originally posit, be enraged by it?
I know my position. I would just like to see how you will attempt to spin out of yours since you've trapped yourself.
What the fuck are you talking about? I've trapped myself?
The military can't burn holy books then turn around and say we, the public, shouldn't burn different holy books.
And guess what? Being outraged is okay. Killing people isn't. Killing people is what Muslims do when they are outraged.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 09, 2010 01:20 PM (h60Tu)
OK, we had another shout out today from Chairman Zero, aimed at the Umma, telling all that he is celebrating with them on their wonderful feast day, this being the end of Ramadan. Whatever. Wasn't the feast day of the beginning of it given the beneficence of His presence at the all-Muzzie dinner in NYC?
I'll want to check my copy of the book, wait, let me get it out of the woodstove . . . to see when the next holy-day is, Islamically.
Where was King They-Talk-About-Me-Like-A-Dog on the feast of Easter, for the Christian faiths, or the Assumption, for which most of the EU states have a national holiday? The Latter Day Saints certainly have some special days, what about them?
And what about the Jews? Do special proclamations go out from the WH on the occasions of the special and holy days? Maybe He should be asking Bibi about this, stick some dates into his Blackberry.
Posted by: Boris Yeltsin at September 09, 2010 01:48 PM (4sQwu)
Somebody has had management classes beyond the 300 level.
Whatever the exhibited behavior, if you reward it, you get more of it. If that behavior appears negative to your way of thinking, too bad.
Monster, I name you, NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT!
Posted by: Blacksmith8 at September 09, 2010 02:46 PM (zWavQ)
That sir, is no religion. Cult maybe, but not religion.
Posted by: Blacksmith8 at September 09, 2010 02:49 PM (zWavQ)
Posted by: frateus at September 09, 2010 04:29 PM (syUI/)
Posted by: chi straightener at September 09, 2010 11:57 PM (S+GtL)
Posted by: Doc Lee at September 10, 2010 06:26 AM (5ou28)
Posted by: Find clock components at September 17, 2010 04:39 AM (N13Sd)
Posted by: Find drycell batteries at September 20, 2010 04:34 AM (TpvnL)
Posted by: computers used at September 22, 2010 05:49 AM (AHAnS)
Posted by: US pet supplies at September 24, 2010 05:09 AM (W5kg2)
Posted by: Titanium Jewellery at January 24, 2011 05:08 PM (dTONH)
Posted by: sdsadassws at February 23, 2011 04:27 PM (wmo+Z)
Posted by: Sexy Bikinis at April 25, 2011 08:40 AM (CrpTs)
buy cheap and 100% genuine windows 7 product key and office 2010 product key
http://www.salekey.net http://www.windows7keysale.net
Posted by: lisa at May 13, 2011 11:50 PM (gWPDX)
Posted by: coco1314 at June 17, 2011 10:56 PM (Vx++B)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2215 seconds, 393 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Definition of PUSILLANIMOUS : lacking courage and resolution : marked by contemptible timidity
Posted by: negentropy at September 09, 2010 09:11 AM (27KAF)