April 08, 2010
— Ace Diplomacy, it seems, consists chiefly of provoking international incidents.
A Qatari diplomat who sparked a bomb security scare after sneaking a smoke in an airplane's bathroom will likely be sent home or transferred to another country, U.S. officials said Thursday.Officials from various agencies were involved in internal discussions as well as talks with Qatar's embassy about how to deal with Mohammed Al-Madadi.
A senior State Department official told CBS News correspondent Charles Wolfson the department understands that Al-Madadi, "will be withdrawn" from his position.
I'd say I was stunned by this guy's arrogance, but I'm really not. There is certainly a sense of entitlement among these cats. The rule against smoking applies to everyone, and yet this guy seemed to take it as a personal offense that it was being applied to him too. So offended was he he cracked wise about being a terrorist, because there again I guess he felt unjustly singled out.
Posted by: Ace at
10:31 AM
| Comments (220)
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
I smoke in the plane bathroom all the time.
All you have to do is tamper with the smoke detector.
Posted by: Mjim at April 08, 2010 10:33 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby, Ex Consort of Hades at April 08, 2010 10:34 AM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 08, 2010 10:35 AM (9Cooa)
Posted by: Obama at April 08, 2010 10:36 AM (V8B//)
3 Arrogant fool deserves it. I'm not sure I buy the official govt story, but (assuming it's true) it was a terrible thing to joke the way he did. He deserves much more than this (prison, at least), but that's not my call.
I hope he got at least a bit roughed up while he was being restrained.
/Today going better than yesterday, ex-consort of Hades?
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 08, 2010 10:37 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: enoxo at April 08, 2010 10:43 AM (Infzd)
I'd do it.
/Today going better than yesterday, ex-consort of Hades?
Kinda. Thanks for asking.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 08, 2010 10:43 AM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: ncj on his htc at April 08, 2010 10:46 AM (yl5m9)
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 08, 2010 10:46 AM (e8T35)
Well.... yeah. Everyone knows that good diplomacy starts with a nuanced disdain for American laws and ways of life.
Posted by: dan-O at April 08, 2010 10:46 AM (+9Rf8)
Posted by: buzz at April 08, 2010 10:50 AM (kwhut)
Posted by: rawmuse at April 08, 2010 10:51 AM (OQ3LO)
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 08, 2010 10:52 AM (H6Jyg)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 08, 2010 10:52 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 08, 2010 10:52 AM (H6Jyg)
Posted by: Dante at April 08, 2010 10:53 AM (J0rOD)
I'm not sure as to which sorts of "cats" you're talking about. Did you mean diplomats or muslims, because the muslims have been pulling this sort of arrogant shit ever since they figured out that the US was more into white guilt than national security. We've had the Flying Imams and tons of other cases where these cats have done stuff that any normal American (excluding The Precedent and his ilk) would not have tried, especially given the tensions, but muslims seem to have taken up the view that the world owes them - not that they ever get any pushback on that from the West.
This is a probing of the West on a grand scale. Not centralized, but just some sort of individual behavior on their part that has been activated by our reluctance to call a spade a "spade" and our pathetic way of fighting wars, drawing distinctions between the fighters and the populations that they don't draw, themselves. We declare mosques to be religious sites, worthy of special treatment, and they treat their own mosques as nothing more than regular buildings with extra protection.
As to our allies in the arab world (such as Qatar/Gutter) Americans will eventually learn that there is no such concept as loyalty among arabs. There are temporary alliances, but that is the extent of it. Americans seem to have a hard time coming to grips with this.
So .. yeah, these cats are arrogant, and in the most inappropriate circumstances, too.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 10:54 AM (N49h9)
Yes. People on it can fly.
Posted by: oblig. at April 08, 2010 10:54 AM (x7Ao8)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 08, 2010 10:58 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 08, 2010 02:58 PM (7VvJB)
Those passengers should file a class action suit against Qatar. After all, diplomatic immunity for the individual means that that state is wholly responsible for his actions. It makes sense to me.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 11:02 AM (N49h9)
You Americans never understand how put-upon we Muslims feel after the decadeÂ’s long jihad against our countries by the Imperialist American Armed Forces.
Yes, I harbor a great deal of resentment against America and Americans, and on this particular flight, two men of southern extraction were very condescending to me, calling me raghead, dress wearing pussy, right hand ass wiper, couscous gobbler, goat fucker, and other bad names.
This is the reason I smoked in the lavatory because of you bastards, and to relieve the stress of sitting next to infidels. May Allah strike you bastards down with prejudice and hatred for your evil imperialistic society.
PS I love BBQ pork sandwiches. and BLT's.
Posted by: Mohammed Al-Madadi at April 08, 2010 11:02 AM (M5t+h)
"You know what might be nice, an actual apology."
I can ghost-write it for him... Does butt-face have one t or two?
Posted by: Rep. Grayson at April 08, 2010 11:03 AM (XiVKO)
Someone school me on the purpose of "diplomatic immunity". We want to avoid offending other countries by hasseling their officials over stupid little things, right?
But it isn't to allow some dipshit like this to joke about being a terrorist while breaking the law, is it? I mean, isn't this guy being just a little bit extremely offensive to begin with?
Posted by: Randy at April 08, 2010 11:05 AM (zQKSr)
Posted by: Dante at April 08, 2010 11:05 AM (J0rOD)
"19 >> I'd give him a B+ for diplomacy
Well.... yeah. Everyone knows that good diplomacy starts with a nuanced disdain for American laws and ways of life.
"
Yeah, and that's just the American state department.
Posted by: Randy at April 08, 2010 11:07 AM (zQKSr)
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at April 08, 2010 11:07 AM (pLTLS)
Mohammed Al-Madadi has been banished to Qatar with his Magic Carpet he ripped off from Disneyworld, and can return to his native country for a week of re-training, and thence a re-posting to London where ragheadness is more accepted than in racist Washington.
Posted by: Fish at April 08, 2010 11:07 AM (M5t+h)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 08, 2010 11:07 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 11:07 AM (0fq7b)
We shouldn't make this a bigger incident than it is. We need Qatar. If i am not mistaken we have a rather large base there, or centcom, or something important. Let's not alienate our quasi allies, especially when it looks like we just lost one in Krgyzistan.
This guy is an idiot, needs to go to another country, lets sweep the rest under the rug.
Posted by: Ben at April 08, 2010 11:07 AM (wuv1c)
I've known a lot of Arab guys to get really fanatical about their smoking.
So let them fly private. No problem.
Posted by: HH at April 08, 2010 11:10 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at April 08, 2010 11:11 AM (muUqs)
Posted by: Debra Medina at April 08, 2010 11:12 AM (XiVKO)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 08, 2010 03:07 PM (0GFWk) "
But why? Are we worried that Islam will declare double war on us or something?
Little worthless countries wouldn't even see airplanes if someone hadn't told them what that black goo was for, anyway.
Posted by: Randy at April 08, 2010 11:12 AM (zQKSr)
I've known a lot of Arab guys to get really fanatical about their smoking. So in that sense also, not just that he's a self-entitled diplomat, this doesn't surprise me.
Elif air ab tizak!
Posted by: Mohammed al-Madadi at April 08, 2010 11:12 AM (cgnkp)
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at April 08, 2010 03:07 PM (pLTLS)
My question is how many slaves he owns. I know that Qatar outlawed slavery way, way, way back in 1952 ... but they still have it in practice - as is true around more than a few of the muslim arab nations.
It's sort of odd how blacks have latched onto islam, thinking it likes blacks better than the evil West, where blacks do better than they have ever done anywhere else, when it was the arab-islamic slave trade long before the Europeans ever had a notion about it, and it is the islamic world (and the arabs, in particular) where slavery is still culturally accepted. Very strange. But, this is one of those inconvenient truths that Gore must have been talking about in his Nobel Prize winning flash presentation.
What a world!
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 11:13 AM (N49h9)
This guy is an idiot, needs to go to another country, lets sweep the rest under the rug.
Posted by: Ben at April 08, 2010 03:07 PM (wuv1c)
Sir Edmund Hillary Clinton of Mt. Everest fame has taken it upon herself to sweep this turd under the edge of the carpet, spray the entire room with Fabreze, and issued the apology to Qatar for the over reaction of both the Air Marshalls and the United Airlines flight crew. The turd has disappeared.
Posted by: Fish at April 08, 2010 11:14 AM (M5t+h)
That reminds me of the satiric computer game Nuclear War...
"Infidel Castro has just launched dissidents at Kookamamie's country. Kookamamie's country gains 2 million citizens."
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 08, 2010 11:14 AM (S/HSv)
That would be great but that'll get thrown out on immunity grounds. I'm blanking on the exact name of it but there's a theory of law that US citizens can't pursue actions against foreign states due that mucking about with diplomacy.
Posted by: alexthechick at April 08, 2010 11:14 AM (8WZWv)
I smoke in airplane restrooms all the time.
But I'm smoking pole, guess that could make a difference.
Posted by: The Charles Johnson at April 08, 2010 11:14 AM (s3LK6)
Tell Allah he's got the address, and I'll be waiting. Also tell him that if he's going to strike me dead I'm ok with that, but not to be a hypocrite and hang out after the fact to watch sports center on the big screen.
Also if you get a chance you might want to ask him about this whole 40 virgins thing, see if you can get some pictures first. I mean if your going to be strapping a bomb to your chest you might want to check to make sure your not going to end up with 40 chicks that are virgins only because nobody else would get anywhere near them.
Think about it, you scream blah blah blah at the top of your lungs, blow yourself up, you wake up in "paradise" and are surrounded by 40 women who are so nasty they have to sneak up on a glass of water. That's right, your stuck for all eternity with 40 hags that make Nancy Pelosi look like a supermodel.
So seriously guys, you might want to double check that before your next Jihad. Just a thought.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 08, 2010 11:16 AM (e8T35)
You definitely didn't want to get into an accident with one. You learned to give them as much room as possible and to get the hell away from them before they did something stupid to shit up your day.
Not surprising that they have the superiority complex thing going on everywhere else in their life, too.
Posted by: sixpckr at April 08, 2010 11:16 AM (Aw7Iv)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 03:07 PM (0fq7b)
Fanatical about smoking, huh? They also kill their own daughters for looking at a guy. That's the culture. It's called "primitive" and "savage". The smoking is not something special.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 11:16 AM (N49h9)
"Can anybody say "test run"?"
Disturbing, seeing as how this man was apparently questioned by marshalls after he was done smoking his cigarette. As opposed to "during." Or, "immediately upon ignition."
It's a tiny bathroom. I would hope that the detector would go off quickly. Did it? If not, why? Did he disable it (which would indicate knowing he shouldn't be smoking in there)?
Posted by: reason at April 08, 2010 11:18 AM (XiVKO)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 03:13 PM (N49h9)
Racist!
Seriously, it's one of the greatest ironies, I think. Esp with the likes of Keith Ellison.
Dan-o, if you're still around, I emailed you at your moron-la gmail addy.
Posted by: wherestherum at April 08, 2010 11:18 AM (gofDd)
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 08, 2010 03:16 PM (e8T35)
See Achmed the Dead Terrorist for clarification.
Posted by: Fish at April 08, 2010 11:18 AM (M5t+h)
Posted by: rawmuse at April 08, 2010 11:19 AM (OQ3LO)
Posted by: alexthechick at April 08, 2010 03:14 PM (8WZWv)
No problem. Sue them in Spain. Spanish courts have jurisdiction over the whole galaxy. Just ask them.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 11:19 AM (N49h9)
Ya'll have been watching too many movies. It doesn't work that way.
Posted by: Vic at April 08, 2010 11:19 AM (QrA9E)
Hey, I hate to interrupt...but did you guys hear that I'm gonna be on Amercian Idol?!!!!!!!
I'm gonna be singing a version of the Black Eyed Peas classic: My Humps
My humps, my humps, my lovely lady lumps
Posted by: Barack Obama at April 08, 2010 11:21 AM (s3LK6)
Maybe it was one of those "funny" cigarettes. You know what I mean.
He was "smoking down" and then he got "punched down."
What would "clowning down" be? lgf?
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 08, 2010 11:22 AM (0QJjg)
Yeah reason, I think there are unanswered questions that will remain that way. I still don't understand how they are managing to shut up entire aircrafts of passengers after incidents like this happen.
As I mentioned on another thread, I don't think we should forget that one of the "jihad janes" is from Colorado and also a NYC guy was arrested in Colorado last summer for attempting to buy a large quantity of chemicals--which he was planning on using in an attack in NYC.
God help me, it's wrong, but I almost wish one of them would succeed eventually so we can stop this pretense of "co-existing" and finally take on the threat.
Sadly, I also know I sound a bit like a truther or a birther, but really, the dots are there to be connected how many more "situations" have to happen before the picture becomes clear?
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 08, 2010 11:22 AM (RZ8pf)
I bet he's going to be so pissed off at us when he is sent home. I mean, sure Obama has completely screwed up the dollar, but it beats going home and getting paid in goats.
Plus, after living in the DC area, it's going to suck to have to go home and date those goats.
Posted by: Maxine Waters' Ugly Ass Glasses at April 08, 2010 11:22 AM (eJl5O)
#67 Ya'll have been watching too many movies. It doesn't work that way.
Really? Are you also saying that if I was convicted of killing somebody but they weren't really dead - they just faked their death to get me in prison, I couldn't just shoot them "in the middle of Mardi Gas" and get away scot free?
My world-view is shattered.
/Hated that movie.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 08, 2010 11:24 AM (9hSKh)
Maybe he was mistaken about what the Mile "High" Club is about.
I myself am a member.
Yeah, but I was alone.
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 08, 2010 11:24 AM (0QJjg)
Posted by: d at April 08, 2010 11:25 AM (sHgQm)
"79 AP sources: Diplomat in airline scare from Regan-Nat'l was headed to consular visit with jailed al-Qaida agent when joked about shoe bomb.
figures "
Say what?
Posted by: Randy at April 08, 2010 11:26 AM (zQKSr)
I hate to say it, but I think that's what it's going to take, PGiS. The people running the country, and that includes a lot of Rs, are so deep in denial it'll take something really big and really bad to wake them up. And some are just plain stuck on stupid.
Posted by: wherestherum at April 08, 2010 11:27 AM (gofDd)
OMG!!!!111111!!1
I just heard that San Fran has declared you can't eat meat on Mondays.
WHY DO THEY HATE GAY PEOPLE?1!!111111!!!
Posted by: Little Fag Fairy at April 08, 2010 11:29 AM (s3LK6)
Posted by: TexBob at April 08, 2010 11:29 AM (2jp4I)
Posted by: Maxine Waters' Ugly Ass Glasses at April 08, 2010 11:30 AM (eJl5O)
Posted by: Charmin Scott at April 08, 2010 11:30 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Fritz at April 08, 2010 11:30 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 08, 2010 11:30 AM (5IGOE)
Posted by: the Qatari "Smart Ass Punk" at April 08, 2010 11:31 AM (YVZlY)
@83 ... this is so wrong and I apologize in advance but ...
They don't hate gays because fruit isn't meat.
Posted by: Maxine Waters' Ugly Ass Glasses at April 08, 2010 11:32 AM (eJl5O)
Hey Vic, how does it work then? I've read many articles about diplomats being let off scott free for all sorts of felonies.
What happens is they are declared personal non grata and expelled from the country.
I suppose their home country could voluntarily strip their diplomatic immunity, but that is up to them.
Bottom line it, I think it does work that way. Much to our sorrow.
Posted by: Ed at April 08, 2010 11:32 AM (OCfDT)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 08, 2010 11:32 AM (OqTsN)
"ItÂ’s like the back of the refrigerator. You see all these wires and the rest. All you need to know is, you open the door. The light goes on"
File this under Let Them Eat Left Over Cake.
From Hot Air Headlines (or, as I prefer to call it, the Other AOSHQ.)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 08, 2010 11:32 AM (xxgag)
Am I up late? 'Rum and PGiS are both here?
Dang. Howdy, ladies.
(I work nights so I pretty much see the ONT after the fact).
Other than that. If anyone here tried that crap, we would still be sitting in some sort of holding cell awaiting bail. And I'm guessing bail would be a lot higher than any of our relatives could pay.
Posted by: HH at April 08, 2010 11:33 AM (GkYyh)
They don't hate gays because fruit isn't meat.
Posted by: Maxine Waters' Ugly Ass Glasses at April 08, 2010 03:32 PM (eJl5O)
We won't even touch that kind of fruit!
Posted by: Fruit Fly Union at April 08, 2010 11:34 AM (s3LK6)
Posted by: Ed at April 08, 2010 11:36 AM (OCfDT)
from reader's digest......"Between 1997 and the end of 2002, foreign diplomats racked up more than 150,000 unpaid parking tickets -- totaling a staggering $18 million. But thanks to diplomatic immunity, the city has no power to collect."
this is just in new york
Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 08, 2010 11:36 AM (OqTsN)
Posted by: Ed at April 08, 2010 03:36 PM (OCfDT)
Yes. The original title was "PC Weapon".
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 11:37 AM (N49h9)
"I still don't understand how they are managing to shut up entire aircrafts of passengers after incidents like this happen."
Call me names if you wish, but if I were a witness to an "incident," and the FBI told me to keep my yap shut about it...I'd keep my yap shut. Especially if I had gotten a first-row seat to the air marshalls "subduing" this fine gentlemen.
Posted by: reason at April 08, 2010 11:37 AM (V40IZ)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 11:38 AM (0fq7b)
This whole thing stinks to high heaven. Sadly, nothing will be done about it and certainly not while we have teh Doofus as president.
Posted by: wherestherum at April 08, 2010 11:38 AM (gofDd)
But then it was the police who got an unpleasant surprise. Their suspect, Salem Al-Mazrooei, was a diplomat from the United Arab Emirates -- and therefore covered by "diplomatic immunity." The cops had to let him go. Days later, Al-Mazrooei left the country, never having spent a night in jail.
Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 08, 2010 11:39 AM (OqTsN)
Posted by: wherestherum at April 08, 2010 03:27 PM (gofDd)
That's exactly right. But even if the worst happens, we will not respond strongly enough. All that will happen is that we'll try to find "the guilty" who's ashes will probably be smoking amid the disaster they cause. Then we'll try to find the mysterious backers of the perpetrators, but they will either never be found or we will not have proof-positive that they did it, even though we know they did. And we'll maybe bomb a few folks and call it a day until they do it to us again. Meanwhile the so-called "moderate" muslims are breeding, pumping out a whole new crop of suicidal zealots with every generation.
Our whole policy of dealing with these pukes is like dealing with an angry little kid who's trying to take a swing - just put your arm out and push his head back so he flails his angry punches in vain. But this little kid is determined, nasty, ruthless, and learning. It's going to be like Israel around here one of these days - with regular attacks by muslims becoming part of the ho-hum daily grind. "Say, Joe, I'd love to have coffee with ya but the Starbucks just blew up again. Third time this year. Go figure."
There is a solution to the muslim problem, but nobody is willing to take the unpleasant steps necessary to insure security and peace. Instead we sit back, deflecting what attacks we can and getting a punch in here and there, waiting for them to finally figure out how to beat us.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 08, 2010 11:39 AM (xUM1Q)
When I was a young manager I made the mistake of hiring the son of a career diplomat. He looked good on paper, but something just didn't feel right.
He was one of the most arrogant sons of bitches I have ever met in my life. The sense of entitlement came off of him in waves.
His abilities were sub par, which he absolutely rejected of course, it was everyone else's problem or because the company was so fucked up.
Canned him after 6 months.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at April 08, 2010 11:39 AM (WvXvd)
Diplomat who caused midair scare was on way to visit with imprisoned Al Qaeda agent
-------
O RLY?
Posted by: Tami at April 08, 2010 11:40 AM (VuLos)
But thanks to diplomatic immunity, the city has no power to collect.
So is the reverse true? Can U.S. diplomats do the same thing in London, or even Qatar?
Because if this is one-sided...
Posted by: HH at April 08, 2010 11:41 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: wherestherum at April 08, 2010 11:41 AM (gofDd)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 11:41 AM (0fq7b)
"ItÂ’s like the back of the refrigerator. You see all these wires and the rest. All you need to know is, you open the door. The light goes on"
This is shit that cannot be made up. Nancy, you have finally gone beyond beclowing yourself to truly evoking the first tinges of pity from me...
Door goes open, light comes on!
Key goes in, car goes vrooom!
Democrat in office, votes go Yea!
Posted by: reason at April 08, 2010 11:44 AM (V40IZ)
never rent to diplomats, from the same reader's digest article...."Perhaps the most brazen deadbeats, though, were officials from Zaire who stopped paying rent to their private landlord and ran up $400,000 in debt. When the landlord sued, the U.S. State Department defended the Zaireans, saying they were protected by immunity -- and a circuit court agreed. The landlord finally cut off the utilities; that's when the officials fled without paying their back rent. (Later, the landlords reportedly reached an "amicable agreement" with Zaire.) "
i don't know what "amicable agreement" means in this matter
Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 08, 2010 11:46 AM (OqTsN)
Excellently lovely, you mean?
Or excellent how?
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 08, 2010 11:46 AM (H6Jyg)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 11:49 AM (0fq7b)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 03:49 PM (0fq7b)
So is Soylent Green.
Couldn't resist.
Posted by: grognard at April 08, 2010 11:52 AM (v0kvW)
Hey Vic, how does it work then? I've read many articles about diplomats being let off scott free for all sorts of felonies.
It depends on the crime committed, the diplomatic level of official, AND in some cases, the particular country in question due to specific treaties.
This chart from the DOS gives a summary
My understanding is that this guy is a “career consular official”. If so he can be arrested for serious crimes, however if his “bad act” was part of official duties he can not be prosecuted. I would find it hard to consider smoking in the aircraft lavaoratory as an “official act” but it appears they are going to allow that.
Also, in most cases, countries will request that immunity be waived for serious stuff and most countries will either do that, or they will handle the prosecution themselves. There has been a lot of cases on both sides of the fence on this.
The bottom line is that it is NOT a cut and dried issue where some Nazi looking thug can hold up an ID card after murdering a hot chick and say “Diplomatic Immunity” so Sgt Murtagh can then blow him away anyway.
Posted by: Vic at April 08, 2010 11:52 AM (QrA9E)
Arabs are.... people.
True. But so were the Aztecs. And I'm pretty sure none of us would have wanted to live in either of those cultures.
Not after growing up here.
Posted by: HH at April 08, 2010 11:55 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: All Ahpund It at April 08, 2010 11:55 AM (s3LK6)
Posted by: demoncrat at April 08, 2010 11:56 AM (1kwr2)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 03:38 PM (0fq7b)
Nobody is saying it's a majority. What we DO have is a large minority. 12.5% of young muslim Americans think that suicide bombings are sometimes justifiable. http://tinyurl.com/yjxf62d
Look at Europe's crime problem (especially rape) and the pattern of muslim on non-muslim violence is unmistakable. And the larger % of the population they are, the worse it gets. http://tinyurl.com/y6ab3h
The "nice" muslims aren't really muslims. They're apostates. They just haven't gone ahead and declared themselves such. Time to make a choice. What is to win out with these people? Common human decency, or the Koran? There is no middle ground. Every single place on earth where they are in charge is a problem area. They are always attacking their neighbors, and generally causing misery. They're a blight.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 08, 2010 11:57 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: somebitch at April 08, 2010 11:59 AM (F9NPo)
Oh, that's rich! A bigoted asshole atheist wants to moralize about prejudice...
Posted by: etnaD at April 08, 2010 12:01 PM (J0rOD)
Posted by: sifty at April 08, 2010 12:02 PM (F9NPo)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:02 PM (0fq7b)
Posted by: sifty at April 08, 2010 12:03 PM (F9NPo)
Also, as others have done, to refer to Arabs as savage is simply wrong.
Some are, some aren't. Most Arabs I know are decent, family-oriented, wistful (as in they have a repressive religious culture, but still wistfully long for certain things) people.
Arab women are often lovely. And the men vary, with some being excellent of course.
Not every Arab is a jihadi or close to it. If you think so, you're ignorant and prejudiced, etc., etc.
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 03:38 PM (0fq7b)
Could you perhaps be a bit less general?
One Arab NOT "being a jihadi or close to it" makes your statement true. But there are a couple of hundred million Arabs in the world. We know of 19 or so who were. Then there's the Janjaweed in Sudan, The odds of the rest being not "close to it" (being a jihadi) seem greatly against you.
"wistful (as in they have a repressive religious culture, but still wistfully long for certain things)
So "wistful" is important? There are one or two Egyptian cleircs who wistfully long for the days when Muslims could own slaves ... check Memri for video footage.
Posted by: Arbalest at April 08, 2010 12:05 PM (BjcIH)
103 - Christoph @ 3:38
Yeah, Christoph, but until I read Gabe's, um, "News Flash" last night, I hadn't realized that those Shisha Hookak Narghile Pipes were portable. Since you're the expert here, what's the proper way to carry one of those bong pipes? Like a bagpipe under one arm, or how?
This site is sooooo educational. Notice the people who come here now, instead of reading graffitti on the walls on bathroom stalls.
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 08, 2010 12:06 PM (ITzbJ)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:07 PM (0fq7b)
Meat is Destroying Teh Planet™*. But like tobacco, they're too pussy to ban it outright...and, entertainingly, "meatless Fridays" is offensive Christofascism.
* Not really, but their religions says it does.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 08, 2010 12:10 PM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:11 PM (0fq7b)
128 There's a difference between wistfully wishing for love, sex, and more freedom, than wistfully wishing for a return to religious slavery, Arbalest.
True, Christophe, but:
1. There are, or were, more than a few Turks and other Muslims who emigrated to Germany and other parts of Europe, claiming that they simply wished to find a place where they could worship without interference. We see how this is working out.
2. Your original and gery general point opened the door ...
Posted by: Arbalest at April 08, 2010 12:12 PM (BjcIH)
Oy. I agreed with this, but I tried to point out to you, in vain, that they are fanatical about most things. This is an artifact of desert culture. Something you know nothing about, evidently.
>>>Also, as others have done, to refer to Arabs as savage is simply wrong.
Read much? Did you even read my short comment to see what I said? Maybe you didn't understand it. Let me repeat it my EXACT words very slowly for you:
That's. the. culture.. It's. called. "primitive". and. "savage"..
I know that the idea was very complex and difficult to folow, but the "it" in the second sentence referred to THE CULTURE. And it - THE CULTURE - is primitive and savage. There is no question about this, at all.
Some are, some aren't. Most Arabs I know are decent, family-oriented, wistful (as in they have a repressive religious culture, but still wistfully long for certain things) people.
Proof by anecdote. That's great, Christoph. You discuss like a dem. You really just don't know jack shit.
Arab women are often lovely. And the men vary, with some being excellent of course.
Huh? What the fuck are you babbling on about?
Not every Arab is a jihadi or close to it. If you think so, you're ignorant and prejudiced, etc., etc.
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 03:38 PM (0fq7b)
Most arabs (and most muslims, in general) support jihad and the war against the West. That has been borne out in every poll that's been taken of the arab/persian/muslim world, and for people like you who are too stupid to understand this, they show it in their newspapers and media.
Get a brain, Christoph. You don't know jack about the arab world. Desert cultures are very different from Western culture. Life in a desert is always on the knife's edge, and they develop very fanatical cultures. This is why an arab can be your buddy for years, and then turn around and slice your throat one day, for seemingly no reason. I tried to get this idea across to you by talking about honor killings, which take a certain attitude that few in the West could ever understand (thank G-d) but you conveniently ignored that. There are thousands of other such examples, but I don't have time to instruct you on something that anyone with a brain should have been able to pick up pretty easily over the past few years (if you had been so ignorant of it beforehand).
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 12:12 PM (N49h9)
How many more decades are they going to let old fuckers in dirty nightshirts beat their women and bankrupt their countries and starve them to death?
Let "wistful" Abu Samuel Mohammed bin Adams get off his ass and save the next generation of Arabs from these crazy sharia fucks.
It's not like they don't have a gozillion AK's and RPG's laying around.
Posted by: sifty at April 08, 2010 12:15 PM (F9NPo)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 03:49 PM (0fq7b)
Interesting example, Christoph. In Saudi Arabia, if girls are suitably dressed to be inpublic, they must be allowed to burn in the school. And the excellent arab fireman stand and watch.
Not a savage culture, at all. Huh?
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 12:16 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:17 PM (0fq7b)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:17 PM (0fq7b)
"135 Look, progressoverpeace, the murdering you refer to is similar to murders that were often done in the name of religion, or motivated by religion, in the west.
As we SECULARIZE our culture and increase the reliance on reason and science, this violence goes down... as religion is marginalized. "
Dah, Comrade, as we showed once and for all in the good old USSR.
Posted by: Stalin at April 08, 2010 12:19 PM (zQKSr)
But they were hardly unheard of in the west... they don't happen much within YOUR living memory... because of things like the Reformation and people like ME.
Man, I don't even have time to start THIS history lesson.
Posted by: HH at April 08, 2010 12:19 PM (GkYyh)
Doesn't that change the "mistaken/overreaction" story just a little bit?
Posted by: tsj017 at April 08, 2010 12:20 PM (4YUWF)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:20 PM (0fq7b)
But I'm simple.
Posted by: sifty at April 08, 2010 12:20 PM (F9NPo)
1) Muslims must kiss the ground 5 times a day, showing how insignificant and worthless each person is.
2) Islam means "submission"
3) Apostacy is punishable by death
4) The islamic claendar was a step backwards in society and was a move back to a totally lunar calendar - unlike every other society on Earth, which were moving in the other direction. Introduction of intercalaries are PUNISHABLE BY DEATH.
5) There are no days of rest in islam.
That's all you need to know about islam, and islamic cultures, to understand what they are really about.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 12:21 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: sifty at April 08, 2010 12:22 PM (F9NPo)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:23 PM (0fq7b)
"Dah, Comrade, as we showed once and for all in the good old USSR.
Posted by: Stalin at April 08, 2010 04:19 PM (zQKSr) "
Copycat!
Posted by: Robespierre at April 08, 2010 12:23 PM (zQKSr)
"145 "Atheist Utopia fantasy again."
Atheists are still primates with instinctual interpersonal violence and the capacity for (again, instinctual) mass violence.
The difference being we don't add religious violence on top of it. "
Anti-religious violence is still cool, right?
Posted by: That's chairman Mao to you at April 08, 2010 12:24 PM (zQKSr)
I have a soul. My wife has a soul. My little two year old boy has a soul. I see it shining out of his eyes every time he smiles at me.
Fuck you and your "primates" bullshit.
Posted by: sifty at April 08, 2010 12:27 PM (F9NPo)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:29 PM (0fq7b)
Posted by: Kemp at April 08, 2010 12:30 PM (2+9Yx)
How much do you have to hate yourself before you try to negate your entire species' soul?
Posted by: sifty at April 08, 2010 12:30 PM (F9NPo)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 03:38 PM (0fq7b)
Yeah, and they're often ugly, too, well, unless you want to expand that premise to include all Muslim women, in which case it can be said that many of the ones in Kroatia and Serbia are OUT-standing babes as a result of breeding with western Euopeans.
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 08, 2010 12:31 PM (ITzbJ)
Posted by: Wistful in Wazyristan at April 08, 2010 12:32 PM (F9NPo)
"What's your point?"
Are you so dense as to be legitimately asking that, or are you ignoring the fact that abortion is strongly protested by religious people and supported by irreligious far more than vice versa?
Posted by: Randy at April 08, 2010 12:33 PM (zQKSr)
Posted by: SarahW at April 08, 2010 12:33 PM (Z4T49)
Posted by: Wistful in Wazyristan at April 08, 2010 12:34 PM (F9NPo)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:36 PM (0fq7b)
24. Arabs can gain control only over flat territory
Thiss is because, on account of their savage nature, (the Arabs) are people who plunder and cause damage. They plunder whatever they are able to lay their hands on without having to fight or to expose themselves to danger. They then retreat to their pastures in the desert. They do not atÂtack or fight except in self-defense. Every stronghold or (locality) that seems difficult (to attack), they bypass in favor of some less difficult (enterprise). They do not attack it. Tribes that are protected against (the Arabs) by inaccessible mountains are safe from their mischief and destructiveness. The Arabs would not cross hills or undergo hardship and danger in order to get to them.
Flat territory, on the other hand, falls victim to their looting and prey to their appetite whenever they (have the opportunity of) gaining power over it, when there is no militia, or when the dynasty is weak. Then they raid, plunder, and attack that territory repeatedly, because it is easily (accessible) to them. Eventually, its inhabitants succumb utterly to the Arabs and then they are pushed around by them in accordance with changes of control and shifts in leadership. Eventually, their civilization is wiped out.
25. Places that succumb to the Arabs are quickly ruined.
The reason for this is that (the Arabs) are a savage nation, fully accustomed to savagery and the things that cause it. Savagery has become their character and nature. They enjoy it, because it means freedom from authority and no subservience to leadership. Such a natural disposition is the negation and antithesis of civilization. All the customary activities of the Arabs lead to travel and movement. This is the antithesis and negation of stationariness, which produces civilization. For instance, the Arabs need stones to set them up as supports for their cooking pots. So, they take them from buildings which they tear down to get the stones, and use them for that purpose. Wood, too, is needed by them for props for their tents and for use as tent poles for their dwellÂings. So, they tear down roofs to get the wood for that purpose. The very nature of their existence is the negation of building, which is the basis of civilization. This is the case with them quite generally.
Furthermore, it is their nature to plunder whatever other people possess. Their sustenance lies wherever the shadow of their lances falls. They recognize no limit in taking the possessions of other people. Whenever their eyes fall upon some property, furnishings, or utensils, they take it. When they acquire superiority and royal authority, they have complete power to plunder (as they please). There no longer exists any political (power) to protect property, and civilization is ruined.
Furthermore, since they use force to make craftsmen and professional workers do their work, they do not see any value in it and do not pay them for it. Now, as we shall mention, labor is the real basis of profit. When labor is not appreciated and is done for nothing, the hope for profit vanishes, and no (productive) work is done. The sedentary population disperses, and civilization decays.
Furthermore, (the Arabs) are not concerned with laws. (They are not concerned) to deter people from misdeeds or to protect some against the others. They care only for the property that they might take away from people through looting and imposts. When they have obtained that, they have no interest in anything further, such as taking care of (people), looking after their interests, or forcing them not to commit misdeeds. They often level fines on property, because they want to get some advantage, some tax, or profit out of it. This is their custom. It does not help to prevent misdeeds or to deter those who undertake to commit (misÂdeeds). On the contrary, it increases (misdeeds), because as compared to getting what one wants, the (possible financial) loss (through fines) is insignificant.
------------------------------------------------------
Even the other muslims understood the truly savage nature of arab culture and not much has changed, at all.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 12:36 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:39 PM (0fq7b)
Posted by: rawmuse at April 08, 2010 12:40 PM (OQ3LO)
Posted by: sifty at April 08, 2010 12:40 PM (F9NPo)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:42 PM (0fq7b)
Posted by: sifty at April 08, 2010 12:45 PM (F9NPo)
"161 I'm not ignoring it, Randy"
Then his point that you were in fact wrong in your implications of relgion causing more violence than the absence of it [especially if one discounts islam] is not lost on you?
"I often wonder if, on average, people's capacity for rational considered thought is a limited variable "
Highly over-rated, I agree, which makes the hubris of most athiests more than ... wistfully sad and downright deadly.
Posted by: Randy at April 08, 2010 12:48 PM (zQKSr)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 08, 2010 12:48 PM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:48 PM (0fq7b)
Posted by: sifty at April 08, 2010 12:50 PM (F9NPo)
here's your first mistake. You think in terms of individuals, since you are Western, but arabs think in terms of tribes and other collectives. There is no sense of individualism among arab cultures, which is part of what I have been trying to tell you. If you ever actually lived around arabs, you would know. And I don't mean meeting some arab guy at the Starbucks, but in the middle east. You do not understand their culture. You project your own onto them and then assess it from there.
How they treat their nieces, friends, and me.
That sort of thing.
Again, you make a huge mistake, here. You mistake cultural requirements of "hospitality" with actual friendship. Many Westerners make this mistake, because they haven't overstayed their welcome (which is very easy to do and comes without any warning) to see the other side of all this.
Your personal relationships with arabs are not the same as arabs' relationships among themselves and how they act as groups. I used to talk about this all the time, but there is a huge difference between the West and the middle east. Succinctly, it comes down to:
Individualism/Guilt/Atonement versus Tribalism/Shame/Revenge
I don't think you understand how different a shame/Revenge based society from our guilt/atonement ones. Most Westerners can't manage to get this, as it is very foreign.
Guilt is a private notion - I can only be guilty for things I have done. I can feel guilt even if no one else knows what I did. It is private and individualistic, which is why the individualistic Western cultures use it.
Shame, on the other hand, is the opposite. It is a purely public notion. I cannot be shamed if no one else knows what I did. I can be shamed by the actions of others, without my input at all.
The differences in the antidotes for these are equally polar opposites. Atonement is individualistic - I must make amends myself. Revenge is public and must be taken out on others. This is why Western cultures generate self-hating suicidal maniacs, while tribal cultures generate other-hating homicidal maniacs.
And some are shitheads, sure. But I'm just doing the Martin Luther King thing and judging as individuals based on the content of their characters, not what some Imam in Iran or Saudi or up the street is saying.
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 04:42 PM (0fq7b)
No. You are displaying an ignorance of arab culture and what that means. You are judging it as if were just some tiny perturbation of our culture. It is not.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 12:51 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 04:48 PM (0fq7b)
If you were in Gaza or Saudi Arabia, your interest in her could be tantamount to a death sentence for her - even if she didn't really show much interest in you, aside from looking your way once or twice. That is what you seem to be missing.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 12:53 PM (N49h9)
Christolph, I think you are arguing against a strawman. No one is saying Arabs are less than human. Of course you can find examples of exemplary Arab or Muslim behavior (ther's a whole lot of them, after all), especially towards each other but even, now and then, I suppose towards outsiders.
But it is silly to say that you know nothing about someone if you know the culture they come from or the beliefs to which they subscribe, man's tendancy towards inconsistency not withstanding. You don't know for certain, but you could guess at several traits and attitudes that are quite harmful towards decent society and be right a large enough proportion to find a partial cause and effect relationship.
Posted by: Randy at April 08, 2010 12:54 PM (zQKSr)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 12:54 PM (0fq7b)
Posted by: sifty
Put Brad and Dianne in the middle of those bookends.
Posted by: mpfs at April 08, 2010 12:54 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: mpfs at April 08, 2010 12:56 PM (iYbLN)
Just keep holding up those books.
Posted by: sifty at April 08, 2010 12:59 PM (F9NPo)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 01:00 PM (0fq7b)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 01:02 PM (0fq7b)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 01:03 PM (0fq7b)
Posted by: rawmuse at April 08, 2010 01:04 PM (OQ3LO)
Posted by: mpfs at April 08, 2010 01:04 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 05:03 PM (0fq7b)
Dude ...
Okay. That was funny.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 08, 2010 01:09 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: Christoph at April 08, 2010 01:10 PM (0fq7b)
However, the bigger reason she and I won't get together in the end is probably that she's into this whole lifelong monogamy thing... whereas I am not.
I feel ya, bro.
Posted by: Jesse James at April 08, 2010 01:18 PM (JeBZ+)
Put Brad and Dianne in the middle of those bookends.
Posted by: mpfs at April 08, 2010 04:54 PM (iYbLN)
Meow!!! Ppfftt!!! Ppfffttt!!! Ppfffttt!!!!
(Psssst, mpfs, is their resident androngynuous intellectual here.)
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 08, 2010 01:33 PM (ITzbJ)
(secret note to any other trolls who happen to pass by here later: GET BENT.)
Posted by: reason at April 08, 2010 01:34 PM (kZVsz)
"The son of a bitch was going to meet a jailed al qaida operative. Well, what do ya know?"
There was a time in this country where this fact would cause him to be a little meeker than usual...
In the Age of Obama, this only emboldens the little puke.
Posted by: reason at April 08, 2010 01:36 PM (kZVsz)
However, the bigger reason she and I won't get together in the end is probably that she's into this whole lifelong monogamy thing... whereas I am not.
No worry, beef curry!
Posted by: Jon Gosselin at April 08, 2010 01:37 PM (kZVsz)
That will be news to my husband of twenty five years and my mother.
Posted by: mpfs at April 08, 2010 02:12 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: mpfs at April 08, 2010 06:12 PM (iYbLN)
Aw geezez, you had to tell us that. Please convey our heartfelt sympathy to both.
(Psssst, she is also this site's resident androgynous yenta.)
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 08, 2010 02:24 PM (ITzbJ)
Posted by: Douche & Bag at April 08, 2010 02:45 PM (H+d3B)
Posted by: Dick & Balls at April 08, 2010 03:24 PM (YCVBL)
Posted by: ford at April 08, 2010 03:26 PM (Ki7fm)
Posted by: ford at April 08, 2010 03:28 PM (Ki7fm)
Posted by: Vic at April 08, 2010 03:52 PM (QrA9E)
No, I think his smoking will be covered as part of his official duties because he was enroute to visit a fellow citizen in jail. Presumably at the oders of his boss.
You can't say that the smoking wasn't covered because it was a crime, and thus not part of his official duties. If that was the case, what is the point of diplomatic immunity? You can't be arrested for anything official and hence legal, but you can be arrested for illegal acts?
Diplomatic immunity covers more than just espionage, which is about the only "official" act that is also illegal.
The purpose of diplomatic immunity is to keep nations from trumping up fake charges against diplomats they don't like, or for a simple criminal matter to gum up affairs of state. Everyone accepts that abuses will occur, but that is just part of the cost of doing business.
I read the same chart you presented. I read it on Wiki, while you went straight to the sourse at the State Dept. website. Good on you. But we seem to be interpreting it differently.
Official duties include going to visit a fellow citizen in prison, and cover crimes or arrests during these duties.
Something that would probably not be considered official duties is going down to New Orleans during a long weekend while officially off duty and getting busted for prostitution.
I agree with you that a nation can revoke the diplomatic immunity of one of their own. However, you think it is common, and I think it is rare.
As far as our lavatory smoker, where did you hear that he was a consular official? I see the difference in the chart and understand the difference. But I think this guy was based in D.C., which indicates he was probably part of the embassy staff, and not some consulate in San Francisco or some other place.
Posted by: Ed at April 08, 2010 03:47 PM (OCfDT)
Anyway, that Lethal Weapon movie with those South Africans was pretty much turned up to 11!!! in terms of hyping the whole "diplomatic immunity" thing, to stoke our collective outrage.
Which of course made this all the more satisfying.
All kidding aside though, yeah, you are right that there are different levels.
But, if the ambassador murdered someone, he could get away with it, if his government backed him. Like if he was closely related to the countries dictator or something.
Posted by: Ed at April 08, 2010 03:58 PM (OCfDT)
Posted by: joseph at April 08, 2010 05:04 PM (L6T16)
Posted by: cheshirecat at April 08, 2010 05:50 PM (MF2WC)
Posted by: Scaramouche at April 08, 2010 07:43 PM (FtFMY)
Congratulations, Mr. Al-Madadi!! You have been named consule of our new diplomatic outpost overseeing Qatar's interests in Antartica! You are to assume your duties immediately, and take control of your office at the McMurdo station. You are expected to attend to those duties for the next three years, year round. Staff? No, I'm afraid its only you.
Posted by: Diane at April 09, 2010 12:05 AM (4T2i7)
Posted by: anyhu at April 09, 2010 12:30 AM (paWLR)
Posted by: YoMamma at April 09, 2010 12:46 AM (4YM0y)
This appears to be a dry run to me. Terrorists using diplomatic emunity as cover. Just an observation.
Posted by: David at April 09, 2010 04:10 AM (zI62g)
I hate to come across as a conspiracy nut, but this really does have dry run written all over it.
First of all, how the hell did he manage to light a cigarette? With his fart?
Second of all, I'm a militant chain smoker and even I wouldn't be that arrogant and stupid on a flight as short as a run from DC to Denver. Especially 30 minutes before landing.
What happened to the 1 hour rule?
Nah, I'm not buying the smoke break story.
Posted by: Jaynie59 at April 09, 2010 04:26 AM (YjQWV)
Just proves that the flight passengers should take this in to their own hands, before diplomatic immunity can kick in to protect these kind of jerks. Diplomatic immunity only protects them from official U.S. government action, not from getting beaten half to death by an irate bunch of passengers.
Pretty soon, the job of the Air Marshals will be to keep these twits alive long enough to be repatriated.
Then Obama can apologize for the "incivility" of U.S. citizens...it's what he seems to do best.
Posted by: ruralcounsel at April 09, 2010 09:40 AM (oJZ42)
It would be an individual suit on behalf of each of the passengers who chose to sue. It's far too small and definite a number of people to certify as a class.
"That would be great but that'll get thrown out on immunity grounds. I'm blanking on the exact name of it but there's a theory of law that US citizens can't pursue actions against foreign states due that mucking about with diplomacy."
It's the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Basically, and in very simplified terms, the only countries that aren't immune from suit in US courts are those that have no formal diplomatic relations with the US. Hence, you can sue Iran or Cuba, and ultimately even get a default judgment or a jury award for some ridiculous amount of money, but you'll probably never collect most of it, since they don't have assets in the US for you to attach to satisfy the judgment and assets in other countries will likely be immune there.
Posted by: Dave J. at April 09, 2010 07:29 PM (DCQ0q)
Posted by: Dave J. at April 09, 2010 07:32 PM (DCQ0q)
thank you ...
ÃáÃá ãæÇÞÚ ÇáÊÃáÃÉ ßæßÊÃá ÇáÇÞÊÕÇà ÇáãäÒáà ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ßæßÊÃá
Posted by: sultan at April 09, 2010 10:50 PM (WFYoY)
Posted by: cra at August 23, 2010 12:28 AM (+hwKT)
Posted by: craigslist tampa at August 23, 2010 12:29 AM (+hwKT)
Posted by: cars classified at August 24, 2010 09:09 PM (/JviG)
Posted by: Craigslist Chula Vista at November 30, 2010 07:16 PM (ykszk)
Posted by: Maquiagens at March 10, 2011 07:15 AM (4rn44)
Posted by: Consultor de empresas at March 16, 2011 09:12 AM (4rn44)
Posted by: aziz at May 05, 2011 10:07 AM (F61jX)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.5861 seconds, 348 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: vinman at April 08, 2010 10:32 AM (HOYRo)