November 21, 2010

Barack Obama, Meet Vasco da Gama [stuiec]
— Open Blogger

The "Diplomatic Editor" of the Daily Telegraph (UK) points out a useful bit of history, about one of the origins of the Clash of Civilizations.

The great Portuguese navigatorÂ’s journey to India brought about the first great collision between Imperial Europe and Islamic Asia. It sparked off a great jihad against the West, complete with suicide attacks, which dragged on for three centuries.

Religious chauvinists might see that war as the outcome of an irreducible hostility between Islam and Christianity. For political realists, however, they hold out an altogether different lesson.

Da Gama’s epic journey took place at the dawn of the period which gave birth to the international system which now holds our world together. His journey unleashed forces which disrupted existing systems of power; specifically, the Indian ocean trading routes controlled by Muslim seafarers and merchants. For the most part, this jihad – magnificently chronicled by the historian Stephen Dale – was in fact about wealth and power.

He points out that for five hundred years, Islamic supremacists have reacted to Western threats to their political and economic hegemony by encouraging jihadists, cajoling them with the promises of rewards in Paradise and glory in this world as martyrs. His answer to that challenge is that the West needs to force Muslim nations into what he calls "the complex systems of norms that bind the modern system of states."

Britain in India, the Dutch in Indonesia and, later, the US in the Philippines, used military force to deal with the Islamist uprisings which targeted them. But they also encouraged the growth of modern nationalist movements, set up bureaucratic and administrative institutions that brought about a dramatic expansion of government, and restructured the relationship between state, political structures and civil society.

Today this is called “nation-building”. In Afghanistan, it almost without doubt isn’t going to be anywhere near completion by 2014. But if it isn’t, the end of the war there is profoundly unlikely to mean the beginning of peace.

At the current NATO summit, our allies are agitating for a full NATO pullout from Afghanistan by 2014. Our Feckless Leader seems incapable of convincing them that leaving according to a calendar rather than a set of achieved objectives will be foolish. I hope our descendants don't look back from the 26th Century on 500 more years of the Clash of Civilizations -- especially not if they look back on it in celebration of the fall of the West and the forced submission to Islam of their ancestors (that is, our children and grandchildren).

Posted by: Open Blogger at 12:33 PM | Comments (78)
Post contains 436 words, total size 3 kb.

1 RELEASE THE CO-BLOGGERS!

Posted by: YIKES! at November 21, 2010 12:34 PM (lzMVN)

2 He points out that for five hundred years, Islamic supremacists have reacted to Western threats to their political and economic hegemony by encouraging jihadists, cajoling them with the promises of rewards in Paradise and glory in this world as martyrs.

This cycle goes all the way back to the conquests of Mecca and Medina, almost 1400 years ago.  Whenever the Islamists faced a threat or incurred a set-back, their solution was to go back to core Islamic principles and submit to them to prevail. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 21, 2010 12:39 PM (9hSKh)

3 When I was a boy, I could never understand how the Dark Ages happened. My problem was this: how could civilization just forget a bunch of stuff it knew?

Now I'm getting some insight into this question.

Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis (patent pending) at November 21, 2010 12:39 PM (fjoLg)

4 3 When I was a boy, I could never understand how the Dark Ages happened. My problem was this: how could civilization just forget a bunch of stuff it knew?

History doesn't repeat itself, it stutters or at least rhymes. 

Or as Snake Plissken would put it, "The more things change the more they stay the same".

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 21, 2010 12:42 PM (9hSKh)

5 Or as Snake Plissken would put it, "The more things change the more they stay the same".

Or as W. C. Fields would put it, "Never give a sucker an even break or smarten up a chump."

Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis (patent pending) at November 21, 2010 12:45 PM (fjoLg)

6

Did someone accidentally trip the sphitzer valve.  The site ain't loading and scrolling properly. 

Or is this a TSA server thing?

Posted by: journolist at November 21, 2010 12:46 PM (O/NP5)

7

Today this is called “nation-building”.

This factualy incorrect.  There were Nations there to start with, however they were directly coupled to the Islamic political/philisophical system.  What was done was a decoupling of Government from the Religious institution... ie creating a more secular Government...

This the fight that the West is now in... for some reason we have decided (because of multiculturalism) to treat Religous controlled Governments, the same as those who believe in the Freedoms of the West... This is why we have Sharia controlled systems in the UN Human Rights commisions.... because we will not differentiate... and we need to.

Posted by: Romeo13 at November 21, 2010 12:47 PM (AdK6a)

8 Sorry, but that article is retarded. 1) The Portuguese actually allied with many Islamic states in the Indian Ocean against the Ottomans —who were at this time allied with Venice and Genoa. 2) Albequerque, not de Gama, was responsible for forging the Portuguese Empire in the East. You can't derive meaningful policy from dime store history treatises about the "clash of civilizations." They might make you feel good about yourself for some strange reason, but they don't tell you what to do.

Posted by: James at November 21, 2010 12:48 PM (Nljcu)

9 His answer to that challenge is that the West needs to force Muslim nations into what he calls "the complex systems of norms that bind the modern system of states."

Well, until the day comes when I can leave my room at the Mecca Holiday Inn and mosey on down to the corner BBQ joint for a pork sandwich and a beer and have the proprietor wish me a merry Christmas, I'll believe it. I'm not holding my breath.

Posted by: ombudsman at November 21, 2010 12:51 PM (c1oyg)

10 Jimmy Johnson, FTW!

If NASCAR shows nothing else, it proves that there are guys in this country who have huge brass ones and put 'em on the line regularly.

Compare a pathetic, whining hack like Osama Obama to a real American like those dudes and it's like putting Billy Barty in the ring against Joe Louis.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at November 21, 2010 12:53 PM (Ulu3i)

11 We have to get out of Afghanistan. Now. There are no "strategic objectives" we can reasonably expect to achieve there, no matter how much longer we continue the fight. Oh, and by the way: We're broke. Remember?

Posted by: Bugler at November 21, 2010 01:05 PM (VXBR1)

12 Yes, ultimately the Islamic World must change or die. None of us will live long enough to see it, but we have seen the start in Iraq.

Posted by: eman at November 21, 2010 01:06 PM (CbwqF)

13 We have a strategic interest in not letting Afghanistan return to what it was in September 2001.

Posted by: eman at November 21, 2010 01:09 PM (CbwqF)

14 OT Our newest Medal of Honor winner was at the Jet's game today and received a rousing standing ovation.He had a hot gf/wife with him too.

Posted by: steevy at November 21, 2010 01:09 PM (5/2Ve)

15 OT Our newest Medal of Honor winner was at the Jet's game today and received a rousing standing ovation.He had a hot gf/wife with him too. Posted by: steevy at November 21, 2010 05:09 PM (5/2Ve) Wife ( I hope since he is married ). I hope he had a good seat

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 21, 2010 01:12 PM (U5btG)

16 >>we have seen the start in Iraq.<< Sort of. All the reconstruction propaganda notwithstanding, the country still looks like hell. The military leadership remains unimaginative and lazy, the political leadership is as corrupt as you'd expect, and the people are hopeless. I had a senior officer over here tell me last night (I'm in Mosul) that the U.S. had "an ethical responsibility" to stay in Iraq past Dec 2011 because of what we "did" to Iraq. He was completely serious. For the sake of our work, I had to bite my tongue, but it wasn't easy.

Posted by: railwriter at November 21, 2010 01:16 PM (BsK3p)

17 Oh, and BTW--his idea of an appropriate length of time to "support Iraq's fledgling democracy that we put in place?" Ten more years.

Posted by: railwriter at November 21, 2010 01:17 PM (BsK3p)

18 We've been supporting Korea's fledgling democracy for sixty.

Posted by: toby928™ at November 21, 2010 01:19 PM (S5YRY)

19 Iraq needs a generation of kids who say "Saddam who?" That place has a long way to go.

Posted by: eman at November 21, 2010 01:21 PM (CbwqF)

20

Is it just me or is the site not loading properly . . . now granted, I myself am nearly loaded on Coronas but I'm not comfortably numb yet.

 

 

Posted by: journolist at November 21, 2010 01:21 PM (O/NP5)

21 Iraq needs a generation of kids who say "Saddam who?" That place has a long way to go. Posted by: eman at November 21, 2010 05:21 PM (CbwqF) What about a generation of Palestinians who say "Arafat" who? Nay who am I kidding, that'll never happen

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 21, 2010 01:22 PM (U5btG)

22 Huh. I thought India was Hindu with some Muslim bits.

Posted by: jeannie at November 21, 2010 01:22 PM (+9uLF)

23

The US needs to demand that all muslim states unequivocally renounce terrorism as anti-islamic, prosecute all those within their boundaries that will not renounce it, open their societies to freedom of worship for all religions, and guarantee the equal rights of all men and women.

Then inform those that will not take these steps that any attack on the US, or US citizens anywhere, will be regarded as having originated in any one or all of them of our chosing, and invite their leaders to imagine what happens if a nuke wipes out one of our cities.

It would work.

Posted by: sherlock at November 21, 2010 01:26 PM (thr9V)

24 22 Huh. I thought India was Hindu with some Muslim bits.

Yes, but even out of a country with over a billion people, a 100 million Muslim minority may be problematic.  Especially with a Muslim country next door that is seemingly itching for a fight with the Indians.

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 21, 2010 01:28 PM (9hSKh)

25

OK, now I'm pissed.  I have to bring a 12 of NewCastle back . . . beer leaving my house as opposed to entering is just not right.

The beer is skunked, tastes like barley pop filtered through garden hose distilled through a mop and reconstituted as liquid yuck.

Posted by: journolist at November 21, 2010 01:28 PM (O/NP5)

26 25, Yeah, but as you describe it, it isn't beer.

Posted by: eman at November 21, 2010 01:30 PM (CbwqF)

27

OK, now I'm pissed.  I have to bring a 12 of NewCastle back . . . beer leaving my house as opposed to entering is just not right.

The beer is skunked, tastes like barley pop filtered through garden hose distilled through a mop and reconstituted as liquid yuck.

Posted by: journolist at November 21, 2010 05:28 PM (O/NP5)

Good for you, being an assertive consumer.   I usually just figure I got screwed- better luck next time.  Beer leaves my house all the time- filtered through my kidneys first, of course

Posted by: ombudsman at November 21, 2010 01:31 PM (c1oyg)

28 Beer leaves my house all the time- filtered through my kidneys first, of course Posted by: ombudsman at November 21, 2010 05:31 PM (c1oyg) All the time? Your aim is really that good?

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 21, 2010 01:33 PM (U5btG)

29

the commenters really stepped up their A-game today. nice job!

sorry, I can only offer the obligatory generic 'nice-job'. I'm trying to sustain all my strength for the 2nd half of this Colts game.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 21, 2010 01:36 PM (0HP3g)

30 All the time? Your aim is really that good?

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 21, 2010 05:33 PM (U5btG)

Well, the extra long hose gives me ample flexibility

Posted by: ombudsman at November 21, 2010 01:37 PM (c1oyg)

31

Just read an interesting article over @ AT

http://tinyurl.com/28nctjx
Good comments. 

Posted by: NoWhereMan at November 21, 2010 01:37 PM (CyPWX)

32 The US needs to demand that all muslim states unequivocally renounce terrorism as anti-islamic, prosecute all those within their boundaries that will not renounce it, open their societies to freedom of worship for all religions, and guarantee the equal rights of all men and women.


Y'all saw the UN vote to condone goverments executing citizens for the crime of homosexuality, right?  79 Islamic and otherwise Third World nations voted for; 70 Western but rapidly becoming Islamified nations voted no.

Posted by: EeyoreRadish at November 21, 2010 01:39 PM (4ucxv)

33 i gotta stick with the Falcons game.  16-10.... halftime.  go Atlanta........

Posted by: Racefan at November 21, 2010 01:39 PM (qLtps)

34 Just read an interesting article over @ AT

I always think that logo looks like Uncle Sam is sitting on the crapper.

Posted by: Waterhouse at November 21, 2010 01:41 PM (bi3em)

35  The oriental despots have always played a "let's you and the extremists fight while I sit back and talk about what an oppressive asshole you are for fighting them" game.

Posted by: Abdominal Snowman at November 21, 2010 01:41 PM (2CcxA)

36 The old-time Chinese did it, I mean, that describes the Boxer Rebellion in a nutshell. Heck, it describes North Korea in a nutshell today.

Posted by: Abdominal Snowman at November 21, 2010 01:42 PM (2CcxA)

37 Are Boomer Esiason and Phil Sims the same guy?

Posted by: ombudsman at November 21, 2010 01:42 PM (c1oyg)

38 Hell, we can't even succeed in nation building in Detroit.

Posted by: WalrusRex at November 21, 2010 01:43 PM (TVvXc)

39 Boomer's not as gay as Simms.

And I mean that in a literal way, not a "hate speech" way.

Posted by: EeyoreRadish at November 21, 2010 01:44 PM (4ucxv)

40 Are Boomer Esiason and Phil Sims the same guy? Posted by: ombudsman Boomer is from the Mirror Universe.

Posted by: eman at November 21, 2010 01:45 PM (CbwqF)

41 I stand corrected . . . that is when I'm not sitting.

Posted by: journolist at November 21, 2010 01:45 PM (O/NP5)

Posted by: laceyunderalls saying nothing on this topic other than 'I report; you decide'. at November 21, 2010 01:46 PM (0HP3g)

43 Are Boomer Esiason and Phil Sims the same guy? Posted by: ombudsman at November 21, 2010 05:42 PM (c1oyg) No Sims has a super bowl ring and a moron dope head son

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 21, 2010 01:46 PM (U5btG)

44 Too few think that this long-view shit means anything.  Like, history is boring.

They're wrong, of course.  But convince them?  Shit.  They're too busy watching Dancing with the Stars or something.

Posted by: Peasant-in-the-Forest at November 21, 2010 01:48 PM (4sQwu)

45

Britain in India, the Dutch in Indonesia and, later, the US in the Philippines, used military force to deal with the Islamist uprisings which targeted them.

True, but the Islamists were only fighting our forces in their lands.  Today we invite the Islamists into our nations and they have brought the fight to us. 

They can now attack our homeland when they couldn't before.  This makes a difference and gives them hope.  They are making converts in our prisons. 

#12 None of us will live long enough to see it, but we have seen the start in Iraq.~eman

Yeah, before we invaded, Iraq was a secular Baathist State and now it's an Islamic Republic based on Sharia Law.  Progress?  No, I don't think so.

Posted by: Speller at November 21, 2010 01:50 PM (J74Py)

46 What Can I say?

Posted by: NoWhereMan at November 21, 2010 01:50 PM (CyPWX)

47 They can now attack our homeland when they couldn't before.  This makes a difference and gives them hope.  They are making converts in our prisons.

Posted by: Speller at November 21, 2010 05:50 PM (J74Py)

This is something we're not paying enough attention to.  Prison Imams need to be scrutinized and monitored

Posted by: ombudsman at November 21, 2010 01:54 PM (c1oyg)

48 #12 None of us will live long enough to see it, but we have seen the start in Iraq.~eman Yeah, before we invaded, Iraq was a secular Baathist State and now it's an Islamic Republic based on Sharia Law. Progress? No, I don't think so. Posted by: Speller Surely you meant to say "peace-loving secular Baathist State".

Posted by: eman at November 21, 2010 01:55 PM (CbwqF)

49 The beer is skunked, tastes like barley pop filtered through garden hose distilled through a mop and reconstituted as liquid yuck.

Never buy beer that's under fluorescents; that'll skunk up a beer in a few hours, especially if it's not in a brown bottle.

Also, never buy Newcastle. It is barley pop.

Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis (patent pending) at November 21, 2010 01:56 PM (fjoLg)

50 What about a generation of Palestinians who say "Arafat" who?

What about a generation of American children who ask, "Daddy what were Muslims?"

Posted by: Pelayo at November 21, 2010 01:57 PM (V9Q+f)

51 Well, the extra long hose gives me ample flexibility.

And the rifling helps too, I imagine.

Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis (patent pending) at November 21, 2010 01:58 PM (fjoLg)

52 Greetings: As long as our leaders continue to give Islam ideological sanctuary by accepting the "religion of peace" delusion, there is little hope for a future free of the Clash of Civilizations. The aggressive, supremacist teachings of Islam provide the ideological underpinnings for any muslim demagogue to take advantage of when his desires are thwarted. It is Islam, itself, that must be identified, attacked, and destroyed.

Posted by: 11B40 at November 21, 2010 01:58 PM (egJZB)

53

The only rational thing to do with the Islamic culture is to create a vast reservation that allows nothing from the west to enter and any body who leaves it is forbidden to go back. Let the shiteheads revel in their 7th century paradise. I want to be able to hop on an airplane with out an ID for a CONUS flight....like it used to be. $29 Sacramento to San Diego on PSA.  Fuck those people.

And don't give me that but what about Ted Kazinsky shit...he should have been marooned on a small deserted barren island. A camera on a pole could have recorded the gooneybirds pecking his brains out through his eye sockets.

Posted by: torabora at November 21, 2010 02:01 PM (+6bzO)

54 53 The only rational thing to do with the Islamic culture is to create a vast reservation that allows nothing from the west to enter and any body who leaves it is forbidden to go back. I nominate Mars. Hell, it's the Planet of (Holy) War, right?

Posted by: CoolCzech at November 21, 2010 02:04 PM (tJjm/)

55 17 Oh, and BTW--his idea of an appropriate length of time to "support Iraq's fledgling democracy that we put in place?"

Ten more years.

Posted by: railwriter at November 21, 2010 05:17 PM (BsK3p)

100 years.

Posted by: John McAmnesty, Loser to an Incompetant Ideologue at November 21, 2010 02:05 PM (+6bzO)

56 http://tinyurl.com/ceep4g

Posted by: NoWhereMan at November 21, 2010 02:06 PM (CyPWX)

57

He points out that for five hundred years, Islamic supremacists have reacted to Western threats to their political and economic hegemony by encouraging jihadists, cajoling them with the promises of rewards in Paradise and glory in this world as martyrs.

This is the point of reference that I am working from.  The Baathists weren't Islamic supremacists.  It is irrelevant to the thread topic that Saddam was a warmonger or despot. 

Making Iraq into an Islamic Republic like Iran is, isn't progress.  Basing all the law on Sharia means the Islamists have a large hand in making the laws and it's also means that after we're gone that they won't find it distasteful to run for public office.

It wasn't wrong to invade Iraq.  It was a mistake to allow Iraq to become an Islamic Republic. 

Posted by: Speller at November 21, 2010 02:09 PM (J74Py)

58 55 17 Oh, and BTW--his idea of an appropriate length of time to "support Iraq's fledgling democracy that we put in place?"

Ten more years.

Posted by: railwriter at November 21, 2010 05:17 PM (BsK3p)

100 years.

Posted by: John McAmnesty, Loser to an Incompetant Ideologue at November 21, 2010 06:05 PM (+6bzO)

1000+ years.

Posted by: Your Military Industrial Complex at November 21, 2010 02:10 PM (+6bzO)

59

It wasn't wrong to invade Iraq.  It was a mistake to allow Iraq to become an Islamic Republic. 

Posted by: Speller at November 21, 2010 06:09 PM (J74Py)

We just sold a shitload of weapons to the Saudis. neener, neener!

Posted by: Your Military Industrial Complex at November 21, 2010 02:13 PM (+6bzO)

60
okay, Dennis Kucinich

Posted by: Soothsayer McRib at November 21, 2010 02:15 PM (BPptn)

61 He's a real nowhere man,
Sitting in his Nowhere Land,
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.

Doesn't have a point of view,
Knows not where he's going to,
Isn't he a bit like you and me?

Nowhere Man please listen,
You don't know what you're missing,
Nowhere Man,the world is at your command!

(lead guitar)

He's as blind as he can be,
Just sees what he wants to see,
Nowhere Man can you see me at all?

Nowhere Man, don't worry,
Take your time, don't hurry,
Leave it all till somebody else
lends you a hand!

Doesn't have a point of view,
Knows not where he's going to,
Isn't he a bit like you and me?

Nowhere Man please listen,
you don't know what you're missing
Nowhere Man, the world is at your command!

He's a real Nowhere Man,
Sitting in his Nowhere Land,
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody!

Posted by: NoWhereMan at November 21, 2010 02:18 PM (CyPWX)

62 Making Iraq into an Islamic Republic like Iran is, isn't progress.

It's not the best outcome to be hoped for but it's not the worst.  I really don't have a problem with Sharia law, as long as it's contained in other countries.  Iraq isn't threatening Kuwait, Saudi Arabia or Israel currently.

I actually don't mind if a country is socialist either, as long as it's not expansionist and just spends it's time impoverishing it's own people.

Posted by: toby928™ at November 21, 2010 02:19 PM (S5YRY)

63 57, That's the glass half-empty view. They need to figure out how to have a free and Islamic nation. Eventually the will realize Islam itself must be, ahem, re-interpreted.

Posted by: eman at November 21, 2010 02:22 PM (CbwqF)

64

Iraq isn't threatening Kuwait, Saudi Arabia or Israel currently.

Currently our forces are still in Iraq. 

They say the Treaty of Versailles led to WWII.  We won that war but lost the peace.  The lesson about taking care how the new status quo is set up after winning the war has been forgotten.  The seeds of future conflict have already been sown in Iraq and Afghanistan, both Islamic Republics.

If we wanted less Islamic supremicists, we shouldn't have entrenched Sharia Law in their constitutions. 

Posted by: Speller at November 21, 2010 02:30 PM (J74Py)

65

You cannot build a functioning Democracy without two important things... Freedom, and a fairly educated Population.

Germany and Japan post WWII had EDUCATED populations... Iraq has a chance... Afganistan??? uh no...

Posted by: Romeo13 at November 21, 2010 02:45 PM (AdK6a)

66 Guess it could be called colonization. We know how much Obama loves colonization and at least according to Dinesh D'Souza, not much.

Posted by: lions at November 21, 2010 02:50 PM (0LHJt)

67

@  34 

 

Commodian??

Posted by: NoWhereMan at November 21, 2010 02:59 PM (CyPWX)

68

 

63, That's the glass half-empty view.

No, it's "the glass was chipped-on-the-rim and had the potential of cutting people so it had to be smashed and replaced, except the replacement was designed to be as big a potential threat as the one that had to be smashed"  view.

Posted by: Speller at November 21, 2010 03:05 PM (J74Py)

69 The best two (ok, technically three) words spoken here are Bugler's: "we're broke". I am currently reading Eric Weiner, The Shadow Market. If you want to sleep tonight, don't read chapter 1, which goes into what happens when we get into an economic scrap with China. Let India, China, and Russia deal with the Muslim nations. The West needs to pull back and rebuild its economic house. PS. If you want to sleep at any point during the following year, don't read up on the financial news coming out of Spain, Portugal, or California

Posted by: Zimriel at November 21, 2010 03:33 PM (x0Iwv)

70 If you want to sleep tonight, don't read chapter 1, which goes into what happens when we get into an economic scrap with China.

What happens?

Posted by: toby928™ at November 21, 2010 04:39 PM (S5YRY)

71 Supposedly we're supposed to reduce our atomic stockpile.  How about reducing it by lobbing a few warheads into some choice Muslim nations. 

Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 21, 2010 05:13 PM (bvfVF)

72 72 cut, jib, newsletter.  thx!

Posted by: NotAMolly at November 21, 2010 05:19 PM (ADJFU)

73 Meh.

I have been cultivating my next door neighbors, Bob and Kathy, as assets, for years!

I'm pretty sure that they are Lutheran, so that tells you that when they go off it's gonna be a big boom, just ask Janet Napolitano.

Question is, how to direct them though.

No telling when the simmering cauldron of rage, hate and ignorance that is my elderly next door neighbors (one of them, probably the guy, was awarded a purple heart! Fer Cry EyeY)! will bubble over.

I'd just prefer it if they were a shaped charge.

We don't actually discuus this, as I'm sure you understand but I feel that the husband and I have reached a sort of agreement.

"That dammed Eucalyptus tree is a hazard!"

Once Bob and Kathy "go hot", I promise to chain them both to the tree right outside my bedroom window, and damn the consequences!



Posted by: Deety who knows that herneigbors don' have internet at November 21, 2010 06:36 PM (Jb3+B)

74 hello everyone,im wholesale supplier  online

Welcome to our website   

=====   http://www.1shopping.us/    =======

accept paypal and free shipping

We need your support and trust!!!

Dear friends, please temporarily stop your footsteps

To our website Walk around A look at

Maybe you'll find happiness in your sight shopping heaven and earth

You'll find our price is more suitable for you.

And we shall be offer you free gift about MP4 if you more order.

=====   http://www.1shopping.us/   ========

Posted by: fsafs46 at November 22, 2010 04:10 AM (ugJNE)

75

Cheap Genuine Microsoft windows 7 product key only $9.99
www.microsoftwindows7key.com Sales 100% Genuine Microsoft Windows 7 Product Key,
Microsoft Office 2010 Product Key,MICROSOFT Windows 7 Boxed Software,
Microsoft Office 2010 Boxed Software.All products issued from Microsoft directly.
we guarantee every key 100% activation,lifelong active,permanent online update,
Or full payment back.

Free shipping + provide free link for windows 7 digit download

Posted by: windows 7 key at November 22, 2010 04:16 AM (DJqsv)

76

... the West needs to force Muslim nations into what he calls "the complex systems of norms that bind the modern system of states."

That's it in a nutshell, isn't it? They want to maintain tyrannical control, benevolent or otherwise. We want everyone in the world to join the world. And if one were to disregard ideologies and political theories and the social realism rhetoric and focus on the actual people that would be affected by going one way or another, one would conclude that our way is a lot better.

(But what do I know? I might be wrong. Maybe people like being hungry and dirty and afraid all the time. Maybe they enjoy burying half of their children.)

Posted by: FireHorse at November 22, 2010 06:30 AM (sWynj)

77

I suggest that Vasco de Gama precipitated nothing. This is typical liberal distortion of the historical record.

Islam conquered most of Spain and Portugal at the beginning of the eighth century and promptly invaded France. Islam was raiding (and holding) parts of France and Italy (eg Sicily) for centuries thereafter. Islam invaded and conquered southeast Europe in the 14th and 15th centuries, well before Vasco de Gama was a gleam in his father's eye.

It is convenient for the liberal mind to blame Islam's aggressiveness on Western provocation. Utter hooey as the record shows. I am of no mind to sugar coat the brutalities of Portugese empire (particularly in Africa and Brazil), but to suggest that the Portugese presence in (mostly Hindu) India in the 16th (and probably 17th) century was possible without a general toleration of their presence by local rulers is just silly. It was mutually profitable to Indians and Portugese (though not of course to Turks and Venetians).

But to a modern liberal, everything bad was ultimately caused exclusively by the West. The meme is so pervasive that it taints even conservative discourse. Time to inoculate against the meme.  

Posted by: JeffM at November 22, 2010 10:02 AM (lbGt4)

78 Yep! I was agreed, I'll keep in touch to your blog.

Posted by: wood arbor plans at March 26, 2011 05:37 PM (uUsYL)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
113kb generated in CPU 0.2023, elapsed 0.3279 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2945 seconds, 206 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.