October 25, 2010
— Dave in Texas This cannot be said too many times.
Barney Frank has served on the (formerly named) House Banking Committee for 29 years. He became the ranking Democrat in 2003 and the chairman in 2007. In 2003 he opposed Bush administration efforts to rein in risky business practices at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying "Treasury would sacrifice activities that are good for consumers in the name of lowering the companies' market risks." (italics mine).
Well they kept risking, and Barney and his pals kept protecting them. These jackasses have hung taxpayers out to dry, frigging billions of dollars, and presided over a cataclysmic financial disaster. Barney Frank ought to be headed to the Big House, instead of the House of Representatives.
NiceDeb (tip via Andy over at the Splitters)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
07:51 AM
| Comments (56)
Post contains 134 words, total size 2 kb.
I want this ad to go national! For the liberals who say the Dems did nothing to cause the crisis.
Posted by: PJ at October 25, 2010 08:12 AM (GK2JE)
Posted by: willow at October 25, 2010 08:12 AM (iAu/o)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 25, 2010 08:12 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: AllenG at October 25, 2010 08:13 AM (8y9MW)
Yup:
"These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis," said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. "The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."
How'd that work out?
The cost for the huge government bailouts of housing finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will grow — and possibly more than double to $363 billion — over the next three years.
Ah, I think Barney should be in jail.
Posted by: Jay at October 25, 2010 08:14 AM (zz1BZ)
Shouldn't they be non-partisan?
And on a side note, why in the hell is the federal government in the home mortgage business anyway?
Posted by: Dave C at October 25, 2010 08:14 AM (6W34m)
My gay friend said something very profound, after seeing this and sending it to all of us, as he formerly worked on WS at one of the firms that was destroyed, "he gives us all a bad name, he plays "the gay card" to keep himself in office, and all Americans should say enough is enough". The guy is a democrat who voted for Obama and has obviously had enough.
Posted by: curious at October 25, 2010 08:15 AM (p302b)
Posted by: JDW at October 25, 2010 08:16 AM (uw+0A)
Posted by: willow at October 25, 2010 08:16 AM (iAu/o)
Posted by: cali grump at October 25, 2010 08:17 AM (hL0k8)
Shouldn't they be non-partisan?
You know his boyfriend ran one of them, right? Do you believe in unicorns that shit skittles too?
Posted by: Dang Straights at October 25, 2010 08:20 AM (fx8sm)
NiceDeb's post has a link for donations that aims to do just that.
This race is going to be close. After adjusting for the Dem oversampling in a district that's majority unenrolled (MA classification for voters with no party ID), we're neck-and-neck in the polls.
Reminding swing voters of the reason Barney needs to be fired as often as possible will put Sean Bielat in the House of Representatives.
Posted by: Andy at October 25, 2010 08:21 AM (veZ9n)
It was more rhetorical..
Posted by: Dave C at October 25, 2010 08:21 AM (6W34m)
You see where it says "Posted by:", beneath the post? What does it say right after that?
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 25, 2010 08:22 AM (KF/Jh)
More change you can believe in: Vet employment slogan changed to, "Don't forget to not hire a vet."
Vet unemployment 2x civilian.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 25, 2010 08:23 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: joncelli at October 25, 2010 08:23 AM (RD7QR)
And on a side note, why in the hell is the federal government in the home mortgage business anyway?
It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an American standard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.
This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.
As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.
We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.”[2] People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.
Among these are:
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.
All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
Americas own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.
For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world.
Posted by: FDR, 11 Jan 1944 at October 25, 2010 08:24 AM (F26eZ)
Posted by: alexthechick at October 25, 2010 08:25 AM (bQ5xy)
Posted by: reason at October 25, 2010 08:27 AM (F26eZ)
The donations have to go directly to the American Victory Fund. To the best of my knowledge, that ad has not aired in Boston.
Posted by: Andy at October 25, 2010 08:31 AM (veZ9n)
Dude, there are many many many people facing foreclosure who owe it directly to Frank's pushing for home ownership for people who could not afford homes.
That is the fawlt of the gweedy cowpowations who took unfawr advantage of the peepew by sedewssing them with unweawisticawwy low intewwest wates!
Just because, fow yeaws on end I enabewwed them to dew so does not make this in any way my fawlt. Sewwiouswy, are yew a wivving womb table or something?
Posted by: Bawney Fwank (D - Homestar Runner) at October 25, 2010 08:31 AM (F26eZ)
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Team at October 25, 2010 08:33 AM (eCAn3)
There's a whole crop of suckers of cock in the current administration and congress that should be in chains, in jail, right now. Bawny's just the horrifying tip of the iceberg.
Would that make Charlie Rangel the corpulent sea lion sunning himself on the edge?
Posted by: reason at October 25, 2010 08:36 AM (F26eZ)
Would that make Charlie Rangel the corpulent sea lion sunning himself on the edge?
Posted by: reason at October 25, 2010 12:36 PM (F26eZ)
RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIST!
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Team at October 25, 2010 08:39 AM (eCAn3)
Dude, there's no need to insult sea lions by that comparison.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 25, 2010 08:40 AM (bQ5xy)
Posted by: Kos Fan at October 25, 2010 08:41 AM (wNWDn)
Bawny's just the horrifying tip of the iceberg.
That's not an iceberg you're seeing, it's a glass butt plug.
Posted by: Reverse Jedi at October 25, 2010 08:41 AM (J74Py)
There is a phrase in italian that translates to head of the dick, or tip of the dick.... basically means dickhead. I wish I could remember it. Anyway, Bawney is totally that.
Posted by: Berserker at October 25, 2010 08:42 AM (gWHrG)
Posted by: kansas at October 25, 2010 08:42 AM (mka2b)
The right of every family to a decent home;
Jesus Christ:
"For you always have the poor with you, and whenever you wish you can do good to them; but you do not always have Me."
Just as I thought. FDR thought he WAS better than Jesus after all.
Posted by: Dave C at October 25, 2010 08:43 AM (6W34m)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 25, 2010 08:46 AM (0GFWk)
@31
"testa di cazzo"
The best Italian swear word (and great colloquialism) is "tarzanello" = a twisted knot of ass hair and shit keeping it together. It literally means "Little Tarzan". You can guess why.
Posted by: JDW at October 25, 2010 08:46 AM (uw+0A)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 25, 2010 08:53 AM (9Cooa)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 25, 2010 08:54 AM (9Cooa)
Posted by: JDW at October 25, 2010 08:57 AM (uw+0A)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 25, 2010 08:59 AM (9Cooa)
I have a thought that I developed watching this election unfold and I thought I'd run it by you all.
It is obvious that the dems are infatuated with Euro socialism. That can't really be logically refuted, imo. But what has amazed me over the last several months is that we have witnessed the end result of that type of socialism and like Soviet style socialism we know that socialism in general, does not end well. European governments are responding the only way they can and the socialist diehards are responding in kind by wrecking chaos on the societies. Who knows who will prevail in the end, but it is obvious for now that socialism will fail and that the diehards will be content to take the societies down with it.
I believe that not only do leftists in this country want to see socialism implemented, they are every bit as willing and eager as the Euro socialists are to see American society fail if either socialism fails or fails to be implemented.
They are so convinced in their own minds that everyone must live as equals no matter what the level of misery is, that they will sacrifice everything including their liberty and their pursuit of happiness to see that everyone lives that way.
They epitomize selfishness.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 25, 2010 09:02 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 25, 2010 09:08 AM (9Cooa)
Posted by: curious at October 25, 2010 09:09 AM (p302b)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 25, 2010 09:13 AM (9Cooa)
Palladino fought Lazio tooth and nail. Why isn't he fighting Cumo like that? It seems as though he has suddenly been neutered. I wonder what is going on, why the baseball bat guy suddenly looks like a giant pussy.
Posted by: curious at October 25, 2010 09:16 AM (p302b)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 25, 2010 09:22 AM (9Cooa)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 25, 2010 09:24 AM (9Cooa)
"...these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness."
where did "equality in the pursuit of happiness" come from?
And Sefton is correct -- Cuomo is running on his 'experience', which is basically nothing but being a politician & bureaucrat.
Posted by: mallfly at October 25, 2010 09:37 AM (bJm7W)
Does anybody really believe that was nothing more or less than a run-of-the-mill gay brothel, and that a sitting Congressman would take that kind of chance, for nothing more than fun and games and a little bit of extra money? Bullshit!
This was nothing but an attempt to gather up a dossier of people for purposes of blackmail and extortion, and coercion. This was during the height of the Cold War. Look at Frank's voting record, not just on foreign policy matters, but other domestic policies as well.
Why has nobody ever looked into this, or discussed it?
Posted by: ThePaganTemple at October 25, 2010 09:37 AM (X8MpV)
Posted by: Nice Deb at October 25, 2010 10:03 AM (7Q12J)
Fwank shares the Most Arrogant Prick in Congress Award with his Senate counterpart Schmucky Schumer. I hope this disgusting POS loses, and since Scott Brown won his district 9 months ago, it may be possible.
Posted by: Schwalbe at October 25, 2010 10:07 AM (UU0OF)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at October 25, 2010 11:30 AM (ncVDF)
He is so embroiled in the hyper-partisan, anti-Republican Democratic lifestyle in Washington that he won't even listen when warned of an impending disaster. Barney, it is time to go! If your mindset is one that can't even listen to warnings of a danger that will wipe out trillions of wealth from an entire nation just because you don't like who is screaming out the warning then YOU are the problem -- that is just insanity.
If he is ever in a fire, God forbid, for his sake lets hope the fireman isn't a Republican.
Posted by: LifeTrek at October 25, 2010 12:49 PM (0jXyB)
I'd gladly settle for "beaten to a bloody pulp".
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 25, 2010 07:19 PM (fxACH)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
61 queries taking 0.1073 seconds, 181 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Vic at October 25, 2010 08:11 AM (/jbAw)