January 05, 2010
— Slublog

Embattled Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd (D) has scheduled a press conference at his home in Connecticut Wednesday at which he is expected to announce he will not seek re-election, according to sources familiar with his plans.I'm sure they're all just retiring because they want to spend more time with their families.Dodd's retirement comes after months of speculation about his political future, and amid faltering polling numbers and a growing sense among the Democratic establishment that he could not win a sixth term. It also comes less than 24 hours after Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) announced he would not seek re-election.
Posted by: Slublog at
08:03 PM
| Comments (213)
Post contains 127 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Senator Roland Burris at January 05, 2010 08:08 PM (P2h1X)
Posted by: SOS Hillary Clinton at January 05, 2010 08:10 PM (P2h1X)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2010 08:11 PM (kwNGE)
Posted by: Chris Matthews at January 05, 2010 08:12 PM (kwNGE)
FIFY
Posted by: fixerupper at January 05, 2010 08:12 PM (ffV1/)
Posted by: Michael Steele at January 05, 2010 08:13 PM (QBQcg)
Posted by: Chris Dodd at January 05, 2010 08:13 PM (kwNGE)
Posted by: Milo at January 05, 2010 08:15 PM (KGyBn)
Posted by: Senator Fiendstein at January 05, 2010 08:16 PM (P2h1X)
Too bad Teddy's not around any more to drive him home.
Posted by: andycanuck at January 05, 2010 08:17 PM (2qU2d)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 05, 2010 08:18 PM (DIYmd)
The son of a bitch has cheated the whole way and now he's cheated us out of that.
Thanks Chris, now go get me a sangwitch.
Posted by: Rocks at January 05, 2010 08:18 PM (OOgDc)
Great that he's leaving but when will he be brought to justice for his role in our economic colapse? He belongs in jail.
Sadly he'll prolly end up on the Board of Directors of Fannie Mae
Posted by: fixerupper at January 05, 2010 08:19 PM (ffV1/)
Posted by: Rocks at January 05, 2010 08:19 PM (OOgDc)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 05, 2010 08:20 PM (9Lm5R)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2010 08:20 PM (kwNGE)
Troubling though is that those with nothing to lose can do a shitload of damage
Posted by: kbdabear at January 05, 2010 08:21 PM (sYxEE)
Actually I was being serious. I didn't think anything would make him leave that primo spot and assumed CT voters are as dumb and gerrymandered as CA voters. (No offense to CT morons, you know I love you!)
Posted by: wherestherum at January 05, 2010 08:21 PM (gofDd)
That's definitely the reason, since we know that once the public sees how super awesome that government healthcare is, we'll capture 80 seats
Posted by: Harry Reid at January 05, 2010 08:23 PM (sYxEE)
>>16 Great that he's leaving but when will he be brought to justice for his role in our economic colapse? He belongs in jail.
Maybe something is brewing and he was told what it is. Invest in popcorn futures..
Posted by: sickinmass at January 05, 2010 08:23 PM (Dxfei)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 05, 2010 08:24 PM (9Lm5R)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2010 08:25 PM (kwNGE)
These Dems are hitting the escape pods just as the contest for Fat Ted's old seat comes inside of 10 points. I wonder if their own polls show the seat being LOST?
Other than that, I wonder if something is coming up that's so bad that they're getting out of Dodge and the DemSM can't cover it up
Posted by: kbdabear at January 05, 2010 08:27 PM (sYxEE)
Ahh this rat frakker was high on the marka list for his rat frakker actions in our Dem primary...
eat it Dodd you AIG bonus giving, lecturing hypocritical tool!!
Dodd is one of the old white men of the DEM party who told Hillary to sit down and shut up and stop running, after HE withdrew, Dodd apparnetly felt Hillary should quit too
frakker
Posted by: ginaswo/MiM at January 05, 2010 08:28 PM (ZJ+6r)
Posted by: JMS at January 05, 2010 08:29 PM (W0h4C)
Posted by: ginaswo/MiM at January 05, 2010 08:30 PM (ZJ+6r)
Posted by: flashbazzbo, s.e. at January 05, 2010 08:31 PM (x7MwC)
Suicide Senator (D-Jihad).
So apt.
Posted by: Les Nessman at January 05, 2010 08:31 PM (v6yKF)
Posted by: cheshirecat at January 05, 2010 08:32 PM (7ApWw)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2010 08:32 PM (kwNGE)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 05, 2010 08:33 PM (9Lm5R)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 05, 2010 08:33 PM (DIYmd)
Posted by: evil libertarian at January 05, 2010 08:33 PM (x9lGm)
Posted by: crystal at January 05, 2010 08:33 PM (KVSUW)
Posted by: UncleZeb at January 05, 2010 08:34 PM (Fgu3H)
He has a number of things going against him. He's Jewish and we already have Lieberman. He will be 64 in February. He's a big supporter of the Public Option and he's the ultimate nanny stater. He's sued everyone from Microsoft to Facebook.
There is also Rosa Delauro to think about. Yeah she old but she also has national democratic heft at least in the party. If she announces then everyone else goes home and the Republicans win easy.
Posted by: Rocks at January 05, 2010 08:34 PM (OOgDc)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 05, 2010 08:37 PM (jmFPD)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2010 08:39 PM (kwNGE)
Posted by: TheresaD at January 05, 2010 08:39 PM (iGCmo)
Posted by: arhooley at January 05, 2010 08:39 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: rawmuse at January 05, 2010 08:39 PM (sETjK)
In his position, who would give a flying **** about a bunch of wingnuts thinking he has been disgraced? Laughing. All. The. Way. To. Bank.
Until the sonumbitch gets indicted, I see this as another insult to America.
Posted by: sparechange at January 05, 2010 08:40 PM (rjkr7)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at January 05, 2010 08:40 PM (Mi2wf)
Posted by: Have Blue at January 05, 2010 08:40 PM (mV+es)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at January 05, 2010 08:41 PM (Mi2wf)
Looks like it's time to start moving desks back over to the Republican side of the aisle. Enjoy this while you can libs. You're days in charge can be measured by less than a year. See ya.
Posted by: sickinmass at January 05, 2010 08:42 PM (Dxfei)
Posted by: TexasJew at January 05, 2010 08:44 PM (dcKUM)
Where do I send my next $20?
To Republican running for Senate in Mass.!!! What a major win that would be!
Posted by: Rewrite! at January 05, 2010 08:44 PM (d7Px0)
Oh, and be prepared for massive voter fraud this year.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 05, 2010 08:44 PM (DIYmd)
no doubt any number of offers to "consult" and "advise" shady businesses and government entities
The problem with that, is that Dodd really is a complete idiot. You won't get your money's worth. A wino with a bottle of T-bird in a brown sack would give better advice.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 05, 2010 08:44 PM (YHbzL)
As others have already commented, Dodd's announcement really ticks me off. We had a good shot at picking up that seat AND watching his sorry ass concede this November. Now our shot at a pick-up is gone AND he gets to retire "gracefully." Dammit, I wanted to watch that asshole go down in flames! Oh well, watching Harry Reid lose will at least be a nice pick-me-up.
Posted by: Shane at January 05, 2010 08:44 PM (En7m1)
be prepared for massive voter fraud this year.
I predict the Margin of Fraud to be well over 10% this year.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 05, 2010 08:46 PM (YHbzL)
>>62 So Dodd walks away with fat pension, nifty health care...
Have you heard of the proposed 28th Amendment that will restrict Congress from getting these benefits?
Posted by: sickinmass at January 05, 2010 08:46 PM (Dxfei)
On the other, it reinforces the public picture of stampeding Democrats, some of whom are likely to be grabbing for real estate brochures from non-extradition countries on their way out the door.
Harry's Bugout Brigade, flipping America the healthcare finger on their way out the door.
Posted by: mrkwong at January 05, 2010 08:46 PM (G8Eo0)
He loves the job. Why trade that to be a junior senator with no heft at 64 years old? Plus he has to wait on people like Larsen and Delauro to say no first.
I think one of the Congress critters will run or Lamont.
Posted by: Rocks at January 05, 2010 08:46 PM (OOgDc)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2010 08:47 PM (kwNGE)
Posted by: TexasJew at January 06, 2010 12:44 AM (dcKUM)
He's a Paul Nut, he's dead in the water.
Posted by: Rocks at January 05, 2010 08:48 PM (OOgDc)
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 05, 2010 08:49 PM (Hv1Cx)
Posted by: mrkwong at January 05, 2010 08:51 PM (G8Eo0)
Dodd is more of a lefty than a moderate and it's not as if we had much faith in moderates anyway, but when you get a bunch of these guys retiring, you get a greater willingness over the next year to go along with legislative suicide missions.
Okay, I'll shut up now and just listen to eman about New Jersey.
Posted by: AD at January 05, 2010 08:52 PM (INZCg)
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 05, 2010 08:53 PM (Hv1Cx)
Unencumbered with reelection, they'll make deals with Obama to feather their nests on the way out. Obama wants Bailout X? They'll say, "Pay me, not my state, for my vote." Obama wants illegal alien amnesty? Again, "Pay me for my vote." Union exemption or new corporate takeover? "Pay me for my vote."
That's the downside to having these once-entrenched bastards at the Federal level opting out now. The country is failing. They're the ones who are most responsible for its destruction. This is the only time they'll be able to parlay their exit with an ideologue at the White House who will willingly throw taxpayer cash around (aka slush fund monies - via TARP for example - in the billions) into payola. Obama wants their votes at all costs because the country is now revolting due to Obama's policies. It's now or never for this great "change" and everyone knows it. The fleeing congresscritters have as much leverage from the far left as they're ever going to get.
We are headed for gridlock or invigorated conservatism as the surge from the Right moves forward. You think these incumbents want to face that for the next several years as their forced retirements loom? Now is the time to cash out when their votes are at a premium with a president who's willing to deal.
I hope we can all follow the money and start turning up the spotlight now before these tax fund raiders walk away.
I still want these America-destroying socialists out of government, but there will be a downside unless we can put extraordinary sunlight on their shenanigans and try to discourage political backscratching beforehand. I hope the up-n-comers start advocating the use and execution of anti-corruption law so that these incumbents actually fear retroactive prosecution.
So in conclusion, these Democrat incumbents suck. Always did. Always will. Let's keep 'em from sucking the nation's coffers even more dry.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 05, 2010 08:53 PM (hF8Tn)
To Republican running for Senate in Mass.!!! What a major win that would be!
---------------------
Oh never fear, I've sent the dough to Hottie McAwesome. I expect to be shelling out for more non-Californians in the coming months.
Posted by: arhooley at January 05, 2010 08:54 PM (GKXA7)
I don't really see this as a problem. The people dropping out are not people who were on the fence on these issues anyway. They are long term assholes and all those votes are coming home to roost.
Posted by: Rocks at January 05, 2010 08:57 PM (OOgDc)
Posted by: arhooley at January 05, 2010 08:57 PM (GKXA7)
---------------------
And a lace wig.
Posted by: arhooley at January 05, 2010 08:58 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2010 09:00 PM (kwNGE)
I predict the Margin of Fraud to be well over 10% this year.
Posted by: Purple Avenger---------------------
Sarah Palin was the only Big Player this year to express outrage at the voter fraud of 2008. It would be awesome if she'd lead some sort of movement to prevent it in 2010, although the ground game could get scary.
Posted by: arhooley at January 05, 2010 09:01 PM (GKXA7)
Maybe, when Dodd has more time to reflect on his lack of integrity and intellectual honesty, he'll choke on the memory of what he has done.
Posted by: sickinmass at January 05, 2010 09:03 PM (Dxfei)
Posted by: ac at January 05, 2010 09:03 PM (A51gv)
When "other career opportunities" is a reason to leave the Senate, you know the Democrats are in deeper shit than even we realized.
Prediction: an annoucement by Boy Idiot Biden that he never even thought about trying to grad the old man's Senate seat.
Bottom line: is it even remotely possible the GOP picks up the Senate, too? This may be historic by the time it shakes out.
Posted by: Harry may be next at January 05, 2010 09:03 PM (d5KAO)
Posted by: ddiddly at January 05, 2010 09:03 PM (JXF5g)
Posted by: Chris Dodd at January 05, 2010 09:04 PM (554T5)
Well, you can't gerrymander a state.
This is a shame. I would have preferred to see him lose by 70 in November mwuhahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Posted by: random at January 05, 2010 09:05 PM (mhbHz)
He's a Paul Nut, he's dead in the water.
Posted by: Rocks at January 06, 2010 12:48 AM (OOgDc)
I'm no Paul Nut, but look who's running against Schiff. A wrestling millionare?
I always hear that shit about Schiff, but I see no one else making any kind of economic sense. He's been right on the money for years. The rest of the Pubbies are economic idiots who think that there will be a good ending to this economic disaster, 15 trillion in debt and no way out. Huge taxes coming, no matter which party is in. This country is economically finished from all this. Find me one Republican who even saw this coming. Where are the real free market voices? Who the fuck put a dimwit hack like Michael Steele into the Chairmanship?
The Republican Party should kiss Schiff's ass. Maybe he is unelectable, but at least he's telling the truth about our economic mess. He is a hard-assed free market-loving guy and takes no prisoners. What the hell is the matter with that?
Posted by: TexasJew at January 05, 2010 09:07 PM (dcKUM)
To Republican running for Senate in Mass.!!! What a major win that would be!"
Amen. And here's Scott Brown's site.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 05, 2010 09:09 PM (hF8Tn)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Bacons, and the Odd Meteor at January 05, 2010 09:12 PM (erIg9)
His foreign policies are undefendable. He makes a guy like Dodd look like a Hawk on defense and foreign policy. You can't hand that kind of advantage to a Democrat and expect to win. It isn't happening. He would get slaughtered.
Posted by: Rocks at January 05, 2010 09:13 PM (OOgDc)
Posted by: Donna at January 05, 2010 09:15 PM (6heFO)
It's basically Simmons to lose right now.
Posted by: Rocks at January 05, 2010 09:16 PM (OOgDc)
And to the 'now they really are going to go for it' people, they were already, this is a once in a century opportunity for them. They aren't going to let bad poll numbers keep them from their socialist utopia.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 05, 2010 09:16 PM (DIYmd)
Posted by: Fresh Air at January 05, 2010 09:17 PM (r86+t)
There's a 1980-like scenario where the GOP picks-up eleven seats, but that kinda required the CT senate seat. The GOP would have to pick-up a lot of momentum nationally close to election day. Basically, here are the scenarios:
Good Year = hold all GOP seats, plus pick-up AR, PA, CO, ND
Great Year = hold all GOP seats, plus pick-up AR, PA, CO, ND, NV, DE
" '94 Special" = hold all GOP seats, plus pick-up AR, PA, CO, ND, NV, DE, IL, CT
"The Full Reagan" = hold all GOP seats, plus pick-up AR, PA, CO, ND, NV, DE, IL, CT, CA, WI, IN
Posted by: Robert_Paulson at January 05, 2010 09:18 PM (+deq6)
Posted by: Lou at January 05, 2010 09:18 PM (JElo+)
Posted by: hotairpundit at January 05, 2010 09:19 PM (OBUuM)
really another shot at Tebow crying over something anybody else might have cried about? Christ the cynism thrown at this guy is incredible, anyone would love their son to grow up to be a Tim Tebow, well I guess that 51-24 win over Cincy was good enough of a reply back to the Tebow haters...no a Bama's loss would be a better reply and i'm praying Texas wins Thirsday
now on the more serious subject:
Dodd quits before we get the satisfaction to see this POS lose a re-electrion bid, I hope Dingy Harry doesn't take that away from us w/ him too. So now CT will prob. go Rep as far as this seat goes in 2010 (i've been a fan of Linda McMahon but it's obvious she's going to come up short in the primaries and waited to long to announce)
Posted by: YRM at January 05, 2010 09:20 PM (xNw7B)
GO ON, Take the money and run...
Unlike his dad, Chris Dodd will manage to leave the Senate without being censured. It's always nice when children can surpass their parents' accomplishments.
Posted by: sickinmass at January 05, 2010 09:20 PM (Dxfei)
i'm predicting this scenario will happen
Posted by: YRM at January 05, 2010 09:21 PM (xNw7B)
Posted by: Rocks at January 06, 2010 01:13 AM (OOgDc)
I don't think he's that much of a Paulnut, but I may be wrong. How about making him Secretary of the Treasury as well? He is great on economic issues and actually knows what he's talking about. He is a great debater and would have taken Dodd apart. The other Pubbies would have gotten run over, since they are big-government suckasses The rest of the Republican party are almost uniformly economic illiterates and are an embarassment to free-thinking conservatives.
One way I look at it is this: no nation can be free and have a strong national defense without a strong economy, I fear that we will have a very weak economy, riddled with socialism and still try to have a strong national defense without the means to pay for it.
North Korea is such a nation. A nation can't be free under those conditions.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 05, 2010 09:22 PM (dcKUM)
Posted by: Lou at January 06, 2010 01:18 AM (JElo+)
Beware of Hoeven, he's a political hack and a tax-loving RINO.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 05, 2010 09:23 PM (dcKUM)
-----------------
I'm satisfied enough to see him skulking away all gutless and unwanted.
Posted by: arhooley at January 05, 2010 09:25 PM (GKXA7)
That's a friggin' pipe dream if I ever saw one. However, if things are going so bad that Feingold and Bayh lose their bids, then you may as well throw in both NY seats as well. If King runs, we'll most likely get one of the anyway.
Hell's bells, why don't we boot Steele and make him run against Mikulski and pick that one up too? Or run whoever in Oregon and boot Wyden?
Posted by: Lou at January 05, 2010 09:26 PM (JElo+)
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 05, 2010 09:27 PM (DIYmd)
Beware of Hoeven, he's a political hack and a tax-loving RINO.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 06, 2010 01:23 AM (dcKUM)
I'd trust him more than I'd trust Peter Schiff, that's for damned sure. At least Hoeven won't vote for timetables and abolishing our war effort.
Posted by: Lou at January 05, 2010 09:28 PM (JElo+)
I don't buy this idea that Dodd out now makes the seat safe for dems. of course an unknown is going to have lower negatives than Dodd, so its immediately going to look a lot closer. but thats because there are more unknowns. its not going to stay like that however and whomever gets in there to pick up and carry the democratic mantle is going to have a huge steaming pile of legacy crap to deal with, and once that happens the negatives will go rise again.
you are going to have two people saying that they're not Dodd, one republican and one democrat. which one can better make that case?
Posted by: exceller at January 05, 2010 09:29 PM (Z7Znk)
Posted by: arhooley at January 06, 2010 01:25 AM (GKXA7)
maybe so, but imagine if LBJ hadn't quit before the 1968 election, Nixon destroys him that election and it's harder to claim he's ranked higher then he should be, C-Span actually that guy #11/41, when I did my personal rankings he came out as #30/41 (W. Harisson & Obama not included)
Posted by: YRM at January 05, 2010 09:30 PM (xNw7B)
Hey boys, I've seen the error of my ways and I'm coming home. Always been a staunch Republican in my very heart.
Keep the light on for me!
Posted by: Arlen Sphincter at January 05, 2010 09:33 PM (zwrlc)
Same argument goes for Evan Bayh. Evan's dad Birch Bayh was defeated in 1980 by Dan Quayle in an upset precisely because the Reagan/pro-conservative/anti-liberal tide was so big that Bayh got swept to sea. If there's a serious pro-GOP mood later this year, you're going to see it materialize in Indiana, and Bayh - regardless of his campaign kitty - will be vulnerable.
You're right about New York, but the NY GOP screwed the pooch in not getting either Giuliani or Pataki to run. King has a shot, but he's going to have to raise $50-$60 million dollars just to be competitive. King is wasting precious time. At this point, unless King is serious, I think the Dems keep New York even under the worst circumstances.
Posted by: Robert_Paulson at January 05, 2010 09:35 PM (+deq6)
-----------------
Breitbart has stated flat out that he has stuff that he's going to release right around election time if Holder doesn't pick up all the breadcrumbs that Breitbart has been sprinkling around.
Posted by: arhooley at January 05, 2010 09:40 PM (GKXA7)
These AGs are all very anti-business but people love to hate corporations. And the political operatives love to run the sleazy AG's instead of state legislators because they don't have any votes to defend. What I have read about Blumenthal is that he's extremely liberal. Think Schumer or Spitzer before his client number 9 fiasco. This doesn't look like good news to me. Along with Coakley, another disgusting lefty.
Posted by: chris999 at January 05, 2010 09:41 PM (B/WwP)
WI is a dem leaning purple state, remember Dukakis made a huge play for it and gotit in 1988, in 1992 and 1996 Clinton got strong votes there w/ his strong independent/moderate base, but Dubya came less then 1% from winning it in 2000 & 2004 & McCain didn't really make a play for it in 2008
Same argument goes for Evan Bayh. Evan's dad Birch Bayh was defeated in 1980 by Dan Quayle in an upset precisely because the Reagan/pro-conservative/anti-liberal tide was so big that Bayh got swept to sea. If there's a serious pro-GOP mood later this year, you're going to see it materialize in Indiana, and Bayh - regardless of his campaign kitty - will be vulnerable.
IN going blue in 2008 was a fluke as was MT going blue in 1992, it was the 2nd closest state for Obama to win (1st was NC & 3rd was FL), and Bayh only won because of his blue dog status which will be questioned after his blind support for Obama
Posted by: YRM at January 05, 2010 09:42 PM (xNw7B)
I'd trust him more than I'd trust Peter Schiff, that's for damned sure. At least Hoeven won't vote for timetables and abolishing our war effort.
Posted by: Lou at January 06, 2010 01:28 AM (JElo+)
Wait till the Chinese come to collect. You'll see a real fucking war.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 05, 2010 09:47 PM (dcKUM)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at January 06, 2010 12:41 AM (Mi2wf)
PPP already has a poll about CT? That's convenient.
Posted by: Mary Beth at January 05, 2010 09:51 PM (JPEqm)
They're all looking for that, aren't they. Probably Dorgan, too. Expand government, and expand lobbying positions available after you leave office. The despicable Tom Daschle gets a huge paycheck from lobbyists. Truly, I don't think these people are any different from the old politburo swine. And some Republicans play this game too. Look at Billy Tauzin, big time lobbyist with Pharma, signed Pharma on to health care reform.
Posted by: chris999 at January 05, 2010 09:51 PM (B/WwP)
Posted by: Fresh Air at January 05, 2010 09:51 PM (r86+t)
Harold Ford Jr., of the famously corrupt Memphis Fords may run for Seantor of NY. ...Worked for Hillary.
AlGore was a reject here, too.
Posted by: Tennessee Rejects at January 05, 2010 09:54 PM (d7Px0)
Posted by: Tennessee Rejects at January 05, 2010 09:55 PM (d7Px0)
Posted by: enoxo at January 05, 2010 09:56 PM (VZZ7v)
Posted by: Fresh Air at January 05, 2010 09:57 PM (r86+t)
Posted by: Rewrite! at January 05, 2010 09:57 PM (d7Px0)
Cloward-Piven on the march again.
This really is a vitally dangerous time for America. The Marxists are doing damage and these Donks are escorting it in right now.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 05, 2010 09:58 PM (hF8Tn)
Should be interesting to see what RCP says about that. WaPo says a likely retention for Dems because Blumenthal is so popular. He had been planning on running for Liebermann's seat in '12, now he will run for this. It sounds like this has all been planned. Blumenthal can start cashing in from the trial bar immediately.
Posted by: chris999 at January 05, 2010 10:01 PM (B/WwP)
65 Gabriel, not sure how serious I take a pollster who uses the word "uber."
While the ball dipping fun we would have watching this POS lose in Nov, has been taken away. If the Dems continue with their path of destruction, all Simmons has to point out is that is was the Dems who caused all the destruction.
Posted by: Opus at January 05, 2010 10:01 PM (IebeI)
how that woman was re-elcted i'll never know, I mean i know it's MI, but MI isn't that blue, Dubya put up a fight there
Posted by: YRM at January 05, 2010 10:02 PM (xNw7B)
Posted by: Fresh Air at January 05, 2010 10:08 PM (r86+t)
There's a lot of these unexplainable elections around the country, aren't there? Those of us who elect the non-Granholm types like Rick Perry (not saying he's perfect) who try to keep a lid on spending get the screw job because our tax dollars just get directed to Michigan in the form of higher federal spending such as medicaid. Also GM/Chrysler bailouts.
I guess here's how you explain these elections: most of the American people are either greedy, i.e., on the dole, or just plain stoopid.
Posted by: chris999 at January 05, 2010 10:09 PM (B/WwP)
Am I the only one who thought: Wow, what a nice gift for Rush's first day back! Dodd and Dorgan gone? I have a feeling he will be on it hard 2morrow. Hehehehehe.
Probably no hard-on, those meds tend to negate that for awhile after heart issues............
Posted by: di butler at January 05, 2010 10:21 PM (S3xX1)
The love that dare not say its name...Sullivan and Johnson. http://tinyurl.com/ydftvu3
Charles Johnson explains his concerns here. He's particularly right about the kind of proto-fascist love of violence against "the other" that you see pulsating in the writing of, say, Michael Goldfarb or Robert Stacy McCain...
Then Andrew asks: "Tea anyone?"
Get a room will ya.
Posted by: Joe at January 05, 2010 10:25 PM (0Gde6)
The love that dare not say its name...Sullivan and Johnson. http://tinyurl.com/ydftvu3
Charles Johnson explains his concerns here. He's particularly right about the kind of proto-fascist love of violence against "the other" that you see pulsating in the writing of, say, Michael Goldfarb or Robert Stacy McCain...
Then Andrew asks: "Tea anyone?"
Get a room will ya.
Posted by: Joe at January 05, 2010 10:25 PM (0Gde6)
Thanks for shitting all over the furniture before you moved out.
They better be burning in a hotter level of hell than me, or there is no justice.
Posted by: awnree at January 05, 2010 10:31 PM (ZNdcE)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 11:04 PM (xCBQ4)
Dems don't fight, they bail. Cowards.
The bigger question is - will the democrat strategy of tarring the GOP and calling the GOP names, work on a nation that sees clearly now- that the democrats are corrupt?
Posted by: pre-paid sex monster at January 05, 2010 11:08 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 11:10 PM (xCBQ4)
Blaggo will be on Trump's celebrity apprentice. After Obama loses in 2012, he should go on that show as well.
Posted by: pre-paid sex monster at January 05, 2010 11:11 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: mrkwong at January 05, 2010 11:13 PM (G8Eo0)
Posted by: Greg Q at January 05, 2010 11:55 PM (87k2j)
Posted by: arhooley at January 06, 2010 12:11 AM (GKXA7)
Good morning Morons
Yes, it appears happy days are here for the RÂ’s except that Piss Clod going down actually hurts the RÂ’s in CT.
But all the hits are not going to the Dems. It seems that the some of the “big tent” asshole squishy Repubs who think they should play nice and help the Dems are taking hits as well. Our old buddy here in SC, Lindsey Grahamnasty took yet another hit from local Republicans who are tired of his shit and they gave him another censor.
From the story:
It was the third time a county Republican Party in South Carolina had voted to censure Graham. Two years ago, the Greenville GOP censured Graham for his support of immigration reform. In November, the Charleston GOP voted to censure Graham for his support of climate-change legislation.
Here is what Graham had to say:
Graham said that while there are fringe elements in both the Democratic and Republican parties, going into the 2010 mid-term elections, Republicans should be focused on growing the party, registering new voters and stopping an "out-of-control Obama agenda."
In other words, he is STILL on the “big tent” kick and looking for even more RINOs. Even as the GOP chairman appears to have got the message and has made noises about getting back to conservative principles Graham maintains his RINOness.
Posted by: Vic at January 06, 2010 12:44 AM (QrA9E)
Oops left this part out
When reading this article please keep in mind it was written by the PR arm of the SC Democratic Party who did not run an official candidate in the last election because they said Graham was the best candidate they could field.
Posted by: Vic at January 06, 2010 12:45 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: bike mike at January 06, 2010 02:46 AM (JE3YT)
Posted by: bike mike at January 06, 2010 02:56 AM (JE3YT)
Posted by: IP Freely at January 06, 2010 03:08 AM (67aEn)
Goldberg.
Rosenberg.
Weinberg.
Iceberg.
IYKWIMAITYD.
Posted by: DoDoGuRu at January 06, 2010 03:19 AM (GXDYm)
Bayh's shtick is to talk about "Hoosier values" and "fiscal responsibility" here in Indiana, and then vote with Harry Reid on every damn issue. The health care bill is going to kill Bayh, because people are really angry and are not willing to give him a pass on this one.
However, we need to have a strong candidate running against him. If the governor (Mitch Daniels) ran, he would beat him handily. Daniels (who has also been mentioned as a presidential possibility) is adamant that he is retiring when his term is up. We need a strong candidate, and so far I haven't seen anyone mentioned. Time is growing short, and our primary is in May.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 06, 2010 03:36 AM (4DwVn)
Posted by: bill-tb at January 06, 2010 03:38 AM (y+QfZ)
Posted by: scrood at January 06, 2010 03:45 AM (4cRlt)
When writing our senators at least the replies from Lieberman had a respectful air to them. The Dodd replies had that certain refined mix of condescension, arrogance, and "Screw you, you unworthy, unsophisticated, peon" that made me want to drain my blood out in service to his opponent.
Dodd walked away from Lieberman over Lamont. I was waiting for the moment when Dodd was looking for a rescue and Joe could quote Spock (Zachery Quinto) and dryly say "No, not really. Not this time"
Posted by: AE at January 06, 2010 03:46 AM (kSfPT)
Posted by: fightobama at January 06, 2010 03:52 AM (6IV8T)
As a CT resident I thought I'd chime in.
With Dodd out of the way any dem running for his seat has one hell of an uphill battle. I predict if the GOP plays its cards right anything with a D next to its name should be a dead man walking.
Blumenthal is a huge PITA in this state and the Republican running against Dodd (Rob Simmons) is a GOOD Republicain for such a blue state.
Pro military, pro-business and the democrats hate him. He only lost his House seat in the D wave with that fool Ned Lamont running against Joe.
Posted by: gdonovan at January 06, 2010 03:52 AM (p8lH7)
In reality, that's the same situation here in Arkansas. As long as Lincoln makes the general, we have a good shot at grabbing the seat. Unfortunately, there are some D's starting to sniff the air about challenging her. If that happens, the fools in this state will vote for the D every frickin' time. It doesn't matter the merits of the candidates. They pull the lever for the D. The only exception seems to be President. We've gone R most of the time (except for Billy Jeff, of course).
Posted by: Steve L. at January 06, 2010 03:58 AM (Gkhxf)
Is Peter Schiff Paul Nut? I mean Paul is a nut because of foreign policy (and the nuts that follow him); on economics, he doesn't sound that nutty, or nutty at all.
Also, I hate Jon Leibowitz (Stewart).
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 06, 2010 04:03 AM (Hv1Cx)
Blumenthal tells The Associated Press that he will announce his candidacy at noon Wednesday at Democratic headquarters in Hartford.
http://tinyurl.com/ydwqrnx
Posted by: Tami at January 06, 2010 04:26 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Popcorn at January 06, 2010 04:37 AM (OOehk)
Posted by: The Family at January 06, 2010 04:40 AM (8cihe)
There's a big liberal pollster who works at one of these commie think-tanks in Washington that used to be a big deal at Brown University that was on the local radio news at 8:30 spinning that Dodd is really good news for the Democrats, so that the CT A.G. can run in his place. Dick Blumenthal or something. I've never heard of him. But I'm sure he's prosecuted a lot of cops and firefighters and stuff...
Posted by: Truman North at January 06, 2010 05:09 AM (e8YaH)
Posted by: navtechie at January 06, 2010 05:11 AM (m9Xrd)
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 06, 2010 05:15 AM (1Jaio)
Part 1: http://tinyurl.com/dmzznw
Part 2: http://tinyurl.com/ydfpzwz
Posted by: Tami at January 06, 2010 05:16 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Jean at January 06, 2010 05:27 AM (6Njk9)
Posted by: Reid loses to Palin at January 06, 2010 05:29 AM (/A16P)
A wino with a bottle of T-bird in a brown sack would give better advice.
Have I ever told you guys the story of Negro Bob?
Posted by: Truman North at January 06, 2010 05:39 AM (e8YaH)
Interesting news out of Rasmussen--Obama's poll numbers have kind of bottomed out over the last few days while he gets to play wartime leader. But the 2010 congressional spread has increased to 9% in favor of the R party.
This must have Michael Steele absolutely terrified.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at January 06, 2010 05:48 AM (DPM1U)
Posted by: GarandFan at January 06, 2010 06:12 AM (ZQBnQ)
Posted by: cranky at January 06, 2010 06:18 AM (vOzml)
Posted by: TexasJew at January 06, 2010 01:07 AM (dcKUM)
Not "who" but "what"...i.e., political correctness. After all, the country elected a minority Democrat as President so the GOP decision makers thought they should do the same with the party chairman. Of course, neither of them are the best or most qualified people to be in those positions. Now the GOP has Steele calling the shots and the vast majority of Republicans, like myself, have no faith that he will maximize Republican gains in the House and Senate this year. This is why I'm not giving money to the RNC or any associated groups anymore, especially since they end up spending a ton of money on so-called "moderates" (i.e., liberal Republicans), like they've done in the past with Dede Scozzafava or Lincoln Chafee. Or how about the lack of money they've sent to Scott Brown in his Senate race in Massachusetts, which though a longshot is not impossible and if he wins the special election could result in stopping the horrific health care plan? I'll just give to individual candidates.
Posted by: Slappy at January 06, 2010 06:21 AM (ljvjO)
Posted by: huerfano at January 06, 2010 06:26 AM (9szrE)
The really scary thing about these Dems choosing to forego reelection is what it suggests about what they could possibly know about the state the economy will be in by November.
Keep tabs on how they vote if a new stimulus bill emerges. This will be their last swill at the trough.
Posted by: Speller at January 06, 2010 06:27 AM (o0R2E)
Oh Doddy boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling
From glen to glen, and down the mountain side
The summer's gone, and all the flowers are dying
'Tis you, 'tis you must go and I must bide.
But never come ye back when summer's in the meadow
Or when the valley's hushed and white with AGW snow
'Tis I'll be here in sunshine or in shadow
Oh Doddy boy, oh Doddy boy, I despise you so.
And if you come, the flowers will all be dying
And I hope I am dead, as dead I well may be
You'll come and find the place where I am lying
And I hope you trip and break your damn knee.
And I shall hear, your moans of pain above me
And all my dreams will warm and sweeter be
If you'll not fail to get out of the Senate
I'll simply sleep in peace knowing you are not destroying my country.
I'll simply sleep knowing you are not destroying my country
Posted by: Joe at January 06, 2010 06:34 AM (0Gde6)
Dick Blumenthal or something. I've never heard of him. But I'm sure he's prosecuted a lot of cops and firefighters and stuff...
This story will tell you all you need to know about Blumenthal.
He makes Nancy Pelosi look like a Conservative.
I only hope that Dodd's announcement starts a massive bloody battle within the CT Dem party, as all the little liberal scum scramble to stake their claim to his seat.
Posted by: wiserbud at January 06, 2010 06:38 AM (tWf3S)
Healthcare reform is simply too important of an issue for me; rather than face distractions such as campaigning for re-election, making nice with donors, or even garnering the support of my consitutents by aligning my votes with their values, I have chosen to not seek re-election.
My apologies to those of my consitutents who may disagree with what I am doing (all 95% of you), but History is calling! Passing this imperative, and astoundingly unpopular, healthcare legislation is vastly more important than continuing to represent you.
Posted by: Chris Dodd at January 06, 2010 06:40 AM (XiVKO)
Posted by: paleRider at January 06, 2010 07:03 AM (UsRyD)
I didn't read through all of the posts, so sorry if this has already been mentioned:
What are the odds that this maneuver is orchestrated to help a certain precedent in 2012?
I'm happy as hell that Dodd is leaving (although it would have been preferrable to see him lead away in chains), but how much of this is an attempt to win in 2012? I think the Dems have given up on 2010, but let's face it -- the economy isn't going to do anything but get worse...if they can pin that back on the GOP (and truth is not nearly so important as public perception, and the public are sheep with short memories and easily distracted by shiny things).
Posted by: unknown jane at January 06, 2010 07:13 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: chicocano at January 06, 2010 07:14 AM (2n5cq)
Dodd retiring is bad news. Had he stayed GOP would have won that seat. Now the dems will retain it. FUCK.
Posted by: Dan at January 06, 2010 07:22 AM (KZraB)
Incumbents are always a problem even if the replacement Dem has lower negatives. The people of CT voted for Dodd (again and again), they have an emotional attachment to him and it's hard to let go. With Torricelli, remember that the NJ Dem party had to dig up Lautenberg. They didn't pick a new guy.
Dodd leaving is a body blow to the Dems. It's demoralizing. With these 3 happening on the same day, there must have been some devastating DNC internal polling. Even those whose races weren't polled have to be nervous if Dodd is quitting.
Reid won't quit. He'd rather be majority leader for 11 months than gracefully bow out. Daschle did OK for himself and Reid is far more corrupt and has far more connections to corruption. Reid's son on the other hand...
I hope Webb becomes SecDef. Let me endorse him right here. Melonhead will cause Obama no end of trouble. I am still waiting for the Webb-Franken fistfight.
Don't forget 2012. That will be the redistricted Congress and if 2010 is a GOP wave, there will be a lot of statehouses that will vote on redistricting for 2012. Also, a lot of these Trojan horse Dems who ran as moderates in 2006 will be up in 2012.
As for who the GOP will run to replace Dodd? There will be a lot more candidates now.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 06, 2010 07:35 AM (T0NGe)
Dodd's retirement is ho-hum. Let me yawn. CT is still a pick up opportunity. The MA race will be a proxy. Simmons is a good candidate and if Lamont runs then Simmons could get Lieberman's endorsement.
Looking ahead. Arlen is about 50/50 to retire, although if he loses the primary all is moot. He may retire early to clear the field for Sestak. Lincoln (AR) is another probable. Her retirement would not surprise. Reid would be huge.
The big one that deserves a burning skull would be Feingold (WI). The one that would make my jaw drop and my eyeballs fall out would be Bayh.
Posted by: MarkN at January 06, 2010 07:59 AM (ZMeaC)
Counting the number of times the MSM use the word "corruption" in their stories....zero....still zero....still zero....yep, still zero....
You know anybody with an (R) after their name would be "Resigning under a shadow of corruption charges..."
Posted by: Georg Felis at January 06, 2010 08:00 AM (PLjtF)
Posted by: PJ at January 06, 2010 08:25 AM (Qpxxz)
Being the people's representative in DC is great except for the, ya know, damn people.
They do have that ...odor... about them, don't they?
Posted by: Harry Reid (Lame-duck - Nev.) at January 06, 2010 08:29 AM (wWwJR)
<a href="http://www.footballsky.net">Footballsky</a>
<a href="http://moneyol.tk">Money online</a>
Posted by: footballsky at March 05, 2010 05:43 AM (KqqNS)
Posted by: promotions at June 01, 2010 05:57 AM (oOjqp)
Posted by: promotions at June 01, 2010 05:58 AM (oOjqp)
Posted by: promotional gifts at November 02, 2010 11:39 PM (Eppx7)
Posted by: Dating Website at November 25, 2010 08:06 PM (vX7yj)
Posted by: Terminal Server at November 29, 2010 11:19 PM (o7oZB)
Discount Pandora Charms from
Greek mythology. Prometheus stole the holy fire of heaven to the earthly.
Zeus in retaliation for Prometheus, the command Vulcan Hephaestus to create a
Women's Pandora and let the gods to make Pandora's generosity can easily be
tempted to mortals. Athena, goddess of wisdom to the Discount Pandora Beads so beautiful
costumes, Venus Aphrodite is given Pandora's beauty. Sisters charm to create a
necklace Hephaestus gave Pandora.
Zeus gave Pandora a box, but she was not allowed to open,
and then sent her to the world. In the creation of Pandora Charms she was given a
curiosity. Therefore could not withstand the temptation to open the box. When
she looked into the box, when all the human suffering of the disease was to the
devil so to escape from the box. Box on the left of hope and opportunity. So,pandora beads also represents luck and
hope
Posted by: discount pandora charms at December 01, 2010 12:29 AM (szkpG)
Posted by: Canadian Drugs at December 30, 2010 10:50 PM (R9vbt)
Posted by: Canada Pharmacy Review at February 08, 2011 08:54 PM (Tv4Qo)
Posted by: wholesale luxury replica cell phone at March 02, 2011 12:21 AM (BZGkJ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3359 seconds, 341 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: wherestherum at January 05, 2010 08:06 PM (gofDd)