November 22, 2010
— Open Blogger

North Korea fired on Yeonpyeong Island in the Yellow Sea, west of the peninsula. South Korea returned fire.
Video of fires and exploding artillery:
Two injured and several houses burned down:
South Korea's YTN television said two people were injured, several houses were on fire and that shells were still falling on Yeonpyeong island. Yonhap news agency, quoting a military official, said four soldiers were wounded. The reports couldn't be immediately verified.YTN said between 1,200 and 1,300 people live in the island, citing an island resident. TV pictures showed black and white smoke rising from the island.
A South Korean Joint Chiefs of Staff official said dozens of rounds of artillery landed on the island and in the sea. The official says South Korea fired back. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of JCS rules, said South Korea's military is on alert. He had no other details.
According to the Breaking News Twitter feed, South Korea is on its highest non-wartime alert and has scrambled F-16 jets.
UPDATE: Reuters: The shelling continues. Approximately 60-70 houses are on fire.
UPDATE: Reuters: Fourteen South Korean soldiers hurt, four seriously.
UPDATE: Steve Herman, VOA: One military fatality. Russia warns against escalation. Obama? (Link via Andy Levy's Twitter feed.)
UPDATE: South Korea to consider pushing the U.N. for condemnation. As Andy Levy says, that'll larn 'em good. (Link via Andy and Steve Herman.)
UPDATE: More pictures at the Yonhap News Agency.
UPDATE: Steve Herman, VOA: Two South Korean Marines killed. South Korea warns of "stern retaliation" if North Korea fires any more artillery.
UPDATE: Breaking News Twitter feed: "U.S. 'strongly condemns' attack on South Korea; calls on North 'to halt its belligerent action' - White House statement"
UPDATE: BBC News: "South Korea says it conducted test firing before the exchange at the island - but says it fired west not north, Reuters reports."
Posted by: Open Blogger at
09:43 PM
| Comments (306)
Post contains 329 words, total size 4 kb.
I wonder what OBambi is going to do? Send Kim a strongly worded letter?
Posted by: runningrn at November 23, 2010 02:11 AM
Harsh language.
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 22, 2010 10:13 PM (RsFpR)
Naa, that's giving Obama too much credit. He'd never go that far.
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 22, 2010 10:14 PM (RsFpR)
Posted by: Smartest administration ever at November 22, 2010 10:15 PM (MYT77)
Posted by: ClassicCon at November 22, 2010 10:17 PM (VHJJS)
Posted by: Ryan Frank at November 22, 2010 10:18 PM (yJPTY)
Damn! I thought Teleprompter Jesus was a Global Saviour?
Looks like Pyongyang wants more Skittles.
Posted by: garrett at November 22, 2010 10:22 PM (a25vD)
Posted by: Eric at November 22, 2010 10:23 PM (PqsRq)
Posted by: Doc at November 22, 2010 10:23 PM (MYT77)
Posted by: Mister Christopher at November 22, 2010 10:26 PM (KyR3d)
Posted by: Ryan Frank at November 22, 2010 10:27 PM (yJPTY)
Posted by: Obama at November 22, 2010 10:27 PM (RsFpR)
Posted by: Doc at November 22, 2010 10:28 PM (MYT77)
Posted by: Drew in MO at November 22, 2010 10:29 PM (R8S84)
Posted by: Eric at November 22, 2010 10:29 PM (PqsRq)
O won't do shit. He's probably hiding under his desk, and has told Axe to let him know when he can come out.
This kind of shit has happened, because the entire world knows O is a pussy. What better time for evil assholes to flex their muscles. They torpedoed that sub, and all Hill did was come out and ask them to play nice. They know they can do whatever they want, and this prez won't do shit but give a speech.
Posted by: Steph at November 22, 2010 10:31 PM (DReGA)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 22, 2010 10:32 PM (bvfVF)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 22, 2010 10:33 PM (bvfVF)
Posted by: Optimizer at November 22, 2010 10:34 PM (2lTU+)
Posted by: Eric at November 22, 2010 10:36 PM (PqsRq)
Posted by: Eric at November 22, 2010 10:38 PM (PqsRq)
Posted by: Mad Saint Jack at November 22, 2010 10:39 PM (zVgnK)
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 22, 2010 10:39 PM (RsFpR)
Posted by: cherny at November 22, 2010 10:41 PM (SyxLS)
Posted by: Drew in MO at November 22, 2010 10:44 PM (R8S84)
Posted by: Eric at November 22, 2010 10:47 PM (PqsRq)
Posted by: Skinner at November 22, 2010 10:48 PM (iYcnG)
I suppose the question is whether it is better to have the fight now or wait until they do it on their terms after having further closed the technology gap. All the signs point to China going "military expansionist" in the very near future unless its leaders (read: dictatorial oligarchy) misjudge their timing and the country implodes first. Somehow, I don't have much faith in pleasant happenstance being forthcoming.
Posted by: Cortillaen at November 22, 2010 10:52 PM (LT1LR)
Great Story at HotAir via the NYT about us negotiating with and transfering large sums of money to a Taliban Imposter during Afghan Peace Talks.
The take away : The Times kept his identity a secret to help the administration negotiate a settlement to the Afghan conflict. The New York Times honored a request to keep his identity off the radar to aid our administration in achieving a negotiated surrender.
Posted by: garrett at November 22, 2010 10:53 PM (a25vD)
Posted by: Eric at November 22, 2010 10:54 PM (PqsRq)
Posted by: Barack Obama at November 22, 2010 10:57 PM (2jQGY)
Posted by: Eric at November 22, 2010 10:58 PM (PqsRq)
The last time China did anything militarily, was when they absolutely capitulated to the Japanese in the 1930's. There hasn't been a single military battle on their land since then
You do know that there were massive battles between the ChiComs and the Kuomintang Chinese nationalists in full scale Civil War from the fall of Japan in 1945 through 1949, right Eric?
Posted by: Speller at November 22, 2010 11:01 PM (J74Py)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 22, 2010 11:02 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Doc at November 22, 2010 11:04 PM (MYT77)
Posted by: Eric at November 22, 2010 11:08 PM (PqsRq)
Posted by: B+rryO at November 22, 2010 11:11 PM (NgSbD)
Posted by: Eric at November 22, 2010 11:13 PM (PqsRq)
Just remember. YOUndecided, oh, those poor Muslims, they must be allowed to speak and be heard ("Wait, hang on a sec, these people's beliefs are crazy!' SILENCE you must allow them to be heard" or you are a RACIST)
Here are the razors. Here are the instructions to slice your throat properly.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 22, 2010 11:15 PM (bvfVF)
Posted by: Chris R at November 22, 2010 11:16 PM (h1iq3)
Posted by: Doc at November 22, 2010 11:16 PM (MYT77)
Posted by: B. Hussein Obama at November 22, 2010 11:17 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 22, 2010 11:20 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: country blumkin at November 22, 2010 11:21 PM (ADeN1)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 22, 2010 11:23 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: SJR2 at November 22, 2010 11:24 PM (oCbCP)
the sinner,
Patrick
Posted by: Patrick at November 22, 2010 11:30 PM (Mfc9p)
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 22, 2010 11:32 PM (RsFpR)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at November 22, 2010 11:37 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: GregInSeattle at November 22, 2010 11:39 PM (B5cM9)
I wonder how Obama will respond? I canÂ’t help but be reminded when back in 2008 Georgia was facing aggression from Russia and then candidate Obama messed up on his response like 3 times. The first time, he urged both sides to back downÂ…because in his world, telling the victim of an attack to stay calm and not react makes PERFECT sense.
So then, knowing how his mind works, how will he react? Is he even aware of it or is he too busy sleeping/eating waffles/playing golf?
Posted by: Mary Beth at November 22, 2010 11:39 PM (uGE+P)
Posted by: Berserker at November 22, 2010 11:42 PM (gWHrG)
Posted by: All the dictators and irresponsible socialists of the world at November 22, 2010 11:47 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: AmishDude at November 22, 2010 11:50 PM (BvBKY)
I'm reminded of a Reagan quote now:
I will not stand by and watch this great country destroy itself under mediocre leadership that drifts from one crisis to the next, eroding our national will and purpose.
Can't imagine why that quote comes to mind.
Posted by: Mary Beth at November 22, 2010 11:52 PM (uGE+P)
Well champ chump, BATTER UP.
Posted by: CPT. Charles at November 22, 2010 11:52 PM (beW+t)
I will not stand by and watch this great country destroy itself under mediocre leadership that drifts from one crisis to the next, eroding our national will and purpose.
Posted by: Mary Beth at November 22, 2010 11:53 PM (uGE+P)
Posted by: Eric at November 22, 2010 11:55 PM (PqsRq)
Posted by: beanervt at November 22, 2010 11:58 PM (kp5tk)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at November 22, 2010 11:59 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at November 23, 2010 12:01 AM (yfJ6g)
More likely how it's going to effect his golfin.....
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 12:02 AM (kp5tk)
Posted by: SJR2 at November 23, 2010 12:05 AM (oCbCP)
Posted by: SJR2 at November 23, 2010 12:08 AM (oCbCP)
Posted by: Eric at November 23, 2010 12:12 AM (PqsRq)
Posted by: bigred at November 23, 2010 12:16 AM (cX9pO)
Posted by: s1mej☼e at November 23, 2010 12:16 AM (9KrgX)
Posted by: cherny at November 23, 2010 12:19 AM (SyxLS)
Not much. This is your blackmail operation.
Time for more handouts before they have to change leaders again. I think their nukes are for resale purpose and they would like to be around to collect which they wouldn't were they to open up the arsenal
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 12:23 AM (kp5tk)
Posted by: JCred at November 23, 2010 12:26 AM (kXxEA)
Posted by: s1mej☼e
If this has philosophical meaning your beyond me.. if it's do you keep another tab (browser window) with a older post ie ONT, I confess I do at least untill spam starts running rampid.
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 12:26 AM (kp5tk)
True enough, the SK Marines were bad ass muthas with attitude and could back it up. When they were given demerits it was also increase in their service time. You didn't want to be on the wrong/receiving end of their outlet.
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 12:33 AM (kp5tk)
Posted by: Korean Machines For Sale at November 23, 2010 12:34 AM (41L6g)
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at November 23, 2010 12:39 AM (9KrgX)
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 12:39 AM (kp5tk)
Posted by: s☺mej☼e
Maybe something is strange, I just posted and don't see it...
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 12:43 AM (kp5tk)
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at November 23, 2010 12:45 AM (9KrgX)
The Whitehouse issued a statement condemning the attack. I feel better already.
Posted by: I'm Hudson; He's Hicks at November 23, 2010 12:48 AM (RsFpR)
Posted by: Drew in MO at November 23, 2010 12:49 AM (R8S84)
Posted by: blaster at November 23, 2010 12:50 AM (MrMxG)
Posted by: canigetwitness at November 23, 2010 12:51 AM (xlzzA)
Posted by: Gem at November 23, 2010 12:53 AM (zw+pb)
Posted by: Drew
But did they "make perfectly clear" the intent to strongly condemn or are they just throwing out the condemn and letting gibbie confuse the press in the morning??
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 12:53 AM (kp5tk)
Posted by: Sec. of Pantsuit at November 23, 2010 12:58 AM (IEeCh)
TOKYO, Tuesday 23 November 2010 (AFP) - Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan said Tuesday he has ordered his ministers to prepare for any eventuality after North Korea fired artillery shells on to a South Korean island.
"I ordered (ministers) to make preparations so that we can react firmly, should any unexpected event occur," Kan told reporters after an emergency meeting of cabinet members and senior officials at his official residence.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at November 23, 2010 12:59 AM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: s☺mej☼e
unfortunately for the country it's a Stench...Thank god their meathooks aren't in the military to deeply.
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 01:01 AM (kp5tk)
0934: Sohn Young-jun in Seoul says Koreans think this event is different from past incidents, because the attack was aimed at Korean land where civilians live. People are afraid that there will be another war. We simply don't understand why North Korea is attacking us so seriously.
I'm really, really hoping this is just a feeling on their part and not a harbinger of things to come.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at November 23, 2010 01:01 AM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Drew in MO at November 23, 2010 01:04 AM (R8S84)
Really South Korea? All of these years of being held hostage by your insane northern neighbor and you don't understand? Cause we all know showing weakness at every turn generally works when trying to deal with a bully and doesn't embolden them...
Posted by: Drew in MO at November 23, 2010 01:08 AM (R8S84)
It is a major departure from the standard batshit crazy from teh North. They have attacked South Korean civilians. It is hard to say that this island had crossed into the North's territorial waters...
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at November 23, 2010 01:13 AM (9KrgX)
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 23, 2010 01:14 AM (RsFpR)
Posted by: Rep. Hank Johnson at November 23, 2010 01:15 AM (9KrgX)
From Reuters: Norks say Sorks fired first.
Well, at least they're funny.
Posted by: rdbrewerNorks say Sorks fired first.Dorks to maybe strongly condemn..
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 01:17 AM (kp5tk)
Posted by: Rep. Hank Johnson
Dumbassery knows no bounds to the dem side of our isle..
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 01:26 AM (kp5tk)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at November 23, 2010 01:40 AM (yfJ6g)
North Korean attack on Yeonpyeong Island is worst against civilians in 20 years
They include a detailed map on the page. Also links to charts, timelines, video, etc.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at November 23, 2010 01:46 AM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: American Elephant
Kimchi sake summit lets see how obozo handles the hard stuff..
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 01:50 AM (kp5tk)
Taxes, nuclear weapons, budgets... now war in North Korea.
Poor Obama, all this "stuff" is hindering the really important and critical work that Congress needs to do like repealing DADT and passing the DREAM Act..
Posted by: swamp_yankee at November 23, 2010 01:52 AM (3DIBw)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby
good info, and the norks stepped the line attacking civies. We should just cut Japan loose on them. they are well armed and trained to the hilt..
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 01:56 AM (kp5tk)
Poor Obama, all this "stuff" is hindering the really important and critical work that Congress needs to do like repealing DADT and passing the DREAM Act..
Posted by: swamp_yankeeWell he might have a chance at raising taxes on the rich if he can figure how to spend a couple trill quick on this..
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 02:09 AM (kp5tk)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 23, 2010 02:15 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: redc1c4 at November 23, 2010 02:18 AM (d1FhN)
Posted by: redc1c4 at November 23, 2010 02:20 AM (d1FhN)
red,
doing my bit as a smart military blog moron
Posted by: redc1c4 at November 23, 2010 02:24 AM (d1FhN)
Harsh language.
Yes, and when they meet, O will only half bow.
Posted by: sTevo at November 23, 2010 02:25 AM (VMcEw)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 23, 2010 02:35 AM (9Cooa)
Posted by: Ugrev at November 23, 2010 02:36 AM (862vz)
UN issues strong condemnation,more to follow after emergency HRC meeting declaring Israel the greatest threat to world peace love and happiness.
Posted by: R at November 23, 2010 02:36 AM (53rh0)
http://tinyurl.com/2f3coud
1126: North Korea's military says: "The South Korean enemy, despite our repeated warnings, committed reckless military provocations of firing artillery shells into our maritime territory near Yeonpyeong island... [Pyongyang] will continue to make merciless military attacks with no hesitation if the South Korean enemy dares to invade our sea territory by 0.001mm."
1119: South Korea says it conducted test firing before the exchange at the island - but says it fired west not north, Reuters reports.
Posted by: Chitown Jerry at November 23, 2010 02:38 AM (Do528)
Proving yet again you should have to pass a test to be in charge of big guns.. or maybe they see how the left lies in this country and figure what ta hell...west north whats the diff.
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 02:43 AM (kp5tk)
Posted by: sTevo at November 23, 2010 02:45 AM (VMcEw)
I was in Seoul in October. Gorgeous city, awesome food, brilliant culture.
If I were Lee Myung-bak, I'd fly a few F-15s up to P'yongyang to drop a few GPS-guided bombs onto Kim Jong-Il's bungalow.
Enough is enough. If there's one regime which deserves to be rubbed-off the face of the eart, it's the North Korean one. And how.
Posted by: Q30 at November 23, 2010 02:47 AM (vxRn7)
Posted by: Getting Ready for Beer Summit at November 23, 2010 02:47 AM (lyvwQ)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 03:08 AM (EiH7n)
Obama: America will not tolerate this blatant act of aggression by North Korea ...
Hillary: Mr. President, Kim Jong-il just announced that he is converting to Islam!
Obama: We surrender!
Posted by: Reagan Youth at November 23, 2010 03:09 AM (KBdRr)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 03:10 AM (EiH7n)
Posted by: billypaintbrush at November 23, 2010 03:10 AM (RS0rp)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 03:11 AM (EiH7n)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 03:13 AM (EiH7n)
Posted by: sTevo at November 23, 2010 03:15 AM (VMcEw)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 03:17 AM (EiH7n)
Posted by: Mark at November 23, 2010 03:20 AM (XxSpS)
I'm sure the Obama/the left will blame Krauthammer.
Don't be silly.
Does "Axis of Evil" ring a bell?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at November 23, 2010 03:23 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 03:28 AM (EiH7n)
1600 civilians live on what is now called a "frontier" island.
10 houses were engulfed in flames," said Woo Soo-Woo, 62, a guesthouse owner on the island.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 03:33 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Vic
There's an idea why don't obozo challange kimie to a game of horse winner gets all the guns and nukes..
Posted by: beanervt at November 23, 2010 03:34 AM (UJEr4)
S.Korea paraded for unity with N.Korea and protested US presence in S.Korea while Bush was POTUS. "Had Bush withdrawn US peace keepers, this would never have happened." Who wants to bet me that Obama won't regurgitate his stoopid blame game for the Thanksgiving holiday? Shit, this couldn't have happened at a better time for Kimmy Jr. to flex his insane muscles and watch everyone quiver with anticipation.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 03:38 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 03:42 AM (EiH7n)
#149 Kimmy Jr. knows martial arts. Weak kneed Obama only knows ineffective teleprompted forked tongue. No, Obama is not America's champion, even shooting hoops.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 03:42 AM (H+LJc)
Are you talking about Seoul, South Korea? Good food and culture, but gorgeous?
Posted by: ef at November 23, 2010 03:45 AM (c7Pp2)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 03:45 AM (EiH7n)
Since the Island's name has always been Taiwan, in the Taiwan Strait, they would have been called Taiwanese all along.
But calling themselves Tibetans wasn't much use in Tibet with Red China's invasive army and subsequent immigration of racist Chinese supremacist thugs.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 03:50 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Grug, Moby Of Doom at November 23, 2010 03:51 AM (Hu/Da)
Taliban Leader in Peace Talks Was an Impostor
That's funny, but the joke is on them. Our President is also an impostor.
Posted by: Onlooker at November 23, 2010 03:51 AM (Bbhvt)
"They couldn't get him up when the 3 a.m. first call came." --Hillary
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 03:54 AM (H+LJc)
"Oh dear, so THIS is why I've was told Presidentin' was serious business!"
Posted by: EZB at November 23, 2010 03:57 AM (fa9yq)
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 03:57 AM (H+LJc)
Yeeesh...I leave you bastards for the better part of a week and come back to the apocalypse?? Was Ace on one of his far east sabbaticals?
Posted by: dananjcon at November 23, 2010 04:09 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 04:11 AM (EiH7n)
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at November 23, 2010 04:11 AM (tE8FB)
Well, I wonder how many civies the Norks will be allowed to murder this time, without any meaningful retaliation. It's bad enough to allow the destruction of a naval vessel to go unanswered, but to allow the random killing of your citizens is unthinkable. If Mexico shelled a Texas border town I am pretty sure we'd do more than complain to the UN. I believe the words "disproportionate response" would be involved. Or at least they would be if a real man was running the executive branch instead of the jug-eared fop.
The North has to be made to pay for this one. Otherwise the abuses will continue and worsen.
Posted by: Reactionary at November 23, 2010 04:12 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 23, 2010 04:12 AM (eOXTH)
South Korea admits it was conducting regular military drills off the west coast before North Korea started firing dozens of shells, but that its firing exercises aimed west, not to the North. --Reuters
Now West Korea's going to get involved?! This whole thing's going to turn out like a marathon Risk game that ends at 3am when your cat starts eating the "X" pieces out of Kamkatcha.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at November 23, 2010 04:14 AM (3iMgs)
Unfortunately I wouldn't be so sure of that.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 23, 2010 04:14 AM (TpXEI)
Risk game that ends at 3am when your cat starts eating the "X" pieces out of Kamkatcha.
Yeah, and I had your ass beat.
Cheater.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at November 23, 2010 04:15 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 08:11 AM (EiH7n)
Hell, the whole damn rat hole is one big death camp. Where else do you have the common people trying to subsist on grass? Sadly, the N.K. people appear to be so vigorously brainwashed and damaged as human beings that they will probably be unfixable if they're ever liberated.
Posted by: Reactionary at November 23, 2010 04:15 AM (xUM1Q)
Sadly, the N.K. people appear to be so vigorously brainwashed and damaged as human beings that they will probably be unfixable if they're ever liberated.
Insert California joke here.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at November 23, 2010 04:17 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 04:18 AM (EiH7n)
What do you suggest? Bombing the Norks into the Stone Age would actually be an improvement.
/The Norks will get a strongly-written letter delivered by Hans Brix. Nothing more.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 23, 2010 04:19 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 23, 2010 08:14 AM (TpXEI)
Sadly, you make a good point. A bunch of spineless, limp-wristed milk sops are running the show at the federal level these days. But I suspect that the Texicans would take matters into their own hands, and make it clear that attacks on their territory would not go unanswered.
Posted by: Reactionary at November 23, 2010 04:20 AM (xUM1Q)
/The Norks will get a strongly-written letter delivered by Hans Brix. Nothing more.
Let's see...Madeleine Albright in a Stevie Ray Vaughn hat didn't work...agreements that we knew they were going to cheat on didn't work...I know, maybe the President can bow to Kim Jong Junior III Mambo King while giving him some DVDs.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at November 23, 2010 04:22 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 04:23 AM (EiH7n)
What do you suggest? Bombing the Norks into the Stone Age would actually be an improvement.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 23, 2010 08:19 AM (9hSKh)
Whatever retaliation takes place has to target the top ranks of the military and political structure. Kill some generals and their families, and some of the ruling class as well. Blow up a few elite schools and destroy their progeny. Take out a couple big statues of dear leader while you're at it. Make it painful for those making these bad decisions.
The commoners are helpless tools. Kill the pukes at the top. It worked in Libya.
Posted by: Reactionary at November 23, 2010 04:23 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Useful Info Nation at November 23, 2010 04:23 AM (34yfJ)
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 23, 2010 04:24 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at November 23, 2010 04:24 AM (3iMgs)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 04:26 AM (EiH7n)
. . . this escalates with the end result being something like Saddam and Kuwait, except The One sits on his hands. Doesn't really happen until maybe next fall.
Fast forward a few months . . .
. . . spring of 2012, Hezbollah forces do a little number in Lebanon, overthrowing that government, establishing Islamic rule. The One, already sitting on hands, sits tight, mumbles something incoherent.
Where does our presidential election go in 2012?
Posted by: Sent from my Commodore 64 at November 23, 2010 04:27 AM (4sQwu)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 23, 2010 04:27 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 23, 2010 04:28 AM (r1h5M)
Group Approves $173K Black Panther Report
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has finally approved a draft report that slams the Obama administrationÂ’s handling of the Philadelphia New Black Panther case.
[ . . . ]
The Commission approved what it calls an “interim” investigation that cost a reported $173,000 to compile.
Michael Yaki, a commissioner who is a Democrat, stormed out of a previous Commission vote but returned for FridayÂ’s committee vote.
Yaki didn’t vote to approve the report and called it “illegimate.”
The report was called an interim draft after a few changes were made to a document that was leaked online on the Web site Talking Points Memo.
Yaki was also the senior advisor to Nancy Pelosi, the former Speaker of the House, for seven years. In 2005, he was appointed to the commission by Pelosi.
Yaki told reporters two weeks ago week report was "cooked" by the panel's majority to "lay an indictment against the Obama administration."
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 23, 2010 04:29 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 04:29 AM (EiH7n)
Posted by: obama wiping the sleep crud from his eyes at November 23, 2010 04:30 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 23, 2010 04:31 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 04:33 AM (EiH7n)
Where does our presidential election go in 2012?
Gov will enact military rule after too many inactions.
Military will enact gov't rule after too many casualties.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at November 23, 2010 04:35 AM (3iMgs)
Posted by: torabora at November 23, 2010 04:39 AM (NgSbD)
I watched those DOJ hearings a month or two ago, and Rep. "Terry" Yaki was a freakin' joke.
Filibustering his way through the Committee's time with irrelevancies and repetition. Totally in the bag for the Administration. If he doesn't like the report, I love it.
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 23, 2010 04:40 AM (Z6Mgb)
Release the smart diplomacy!!
This should be good. After all they're "smart", or at least they think so.
Posted by: dagny at November 23, 2010 04:40 AM (2GOHX)
Posted by: dagny at November 23, 2010 04:42 AM (2GOHX)
Posted by: dagny at November 23, 2010 04:42 AM (2GOHX)
Posted by: Dave C at November 23, 2010 04:44 AM (poJjg)
/The Norks will get a strongly-written letter delivered by Hans Brix. Nothing more.
Let's see...Madeleine Albright in a Stevie Ray Vaughn hat didn't work...agreements that we knew they were going to cheat on didn't work...I know, maybe the President can bow to Kim Jong Junior III Mambo King while giving him some DVDs.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at November 23, 2010 08:22 AM (B+qrE)
Porn videos might work. Try Hillary and Huma. Hubba hubba yabba dabba do!
Posted by: torabora at November 23, 2010 04:44 AM (NgSbD)
ef: I was mainly referring to Changdeokgung and the girls.
Posted by: Q30 at November 23, 2010 04:49 AM (vxRn7)
I'm thankful that I don't live a mere 100 miles from a batshit insane crazy menacing dictator with nukes and guns aimed in my general direction
Posted by: chemjeff at November 23, 2010 04:50 AM (PaSAU)
Posted by: Ben at November 23, 2010 04:50 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 04:52 AM (EiH7n)
I'm thankful that I don't live a mere 100 miles from a batshit insane crazy menacing dictator with nukes and guns aimed in my general direction
Well, with an Afghanistan "strategy" that hands sacks of cash to fake Taliban, insecure borders, insecure airport underwear, a DOJ that enforces social polcies and not laws, and NYT columnists calling for civil war, I'm sufficiently terrified right here--thanks.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at November 23, 2010 04:54 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 04:56 AM (EiH7n)
Posted by: ford the IINO. Independent in name only at November 23, 2010 04:57 AM (Ki7fm)
The NORKs have been waiting since the 50's for The One. Now he's here.
Posted by: maddogg at November 23, 2010 04:57 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: ford the IINO. Independent in name only at November 23, 2010 04:58 AM (Ki7fm)
Ben, how'd you do that?
The blog puts the posts in chronological order. So if you go to the "edit entry" page and scroll down to where it says "authored on", you'll see it is in military 24 hour time. Just change the time it was authored. For example, you wrote it at like 01:43:00, so I went and changed the time to 08:40:20 and saved it. The blog then thinks that this post was written after my morning post and therefore puts it above it.
Posted by: Ben at November 23, 2010 04:59 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 23, 2010 05:00 AM (PaSAU)
Posted by: Ben at November 23, 2010 05:00 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: torabora at November 23, 2010 05:01 AM (NgSbD)
Circa @ 208, nevertheless there's still plenty of blessings to count
Completely agree. Mrs. Circa and the little cricas keep me sane. Most of the time.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at November 23, 2010 05:02 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 05:03 AM (EiH7n)
ef: I was mainly referring to Changdeokgung and the girls.
Posted by: Q30Yeah, the stuff built before 1960 is impressive. The girls built before 1960, less so.
Posted by: ef at November 23, 2010 05:03 AM (c7Pp2)
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 23, 2010 05:04 AM (RsFpR)
Posted by: maddogg at November 23, 2010 05:05 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: km at November 23, 2010 05:06 AM (oUaBK)
Posted by: maddogg at November 23, 2010 09:05 AM (OlN4e)
Ours
Posted by: China at November 23, 2010 05:07 AM (NgSbD)
However, there is the possibility that he's got all his "smart diplomats" at the State Department on BabelFish, trying to get a surrender letter together to send to Crazy Uncle Kim Our Future Overlord/Dear Leader.
Posted by: shibumi at November 23, 2010 05:09 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: eman at November 23, 2010 05:13 AM (CbwqF)
ok, done.
What can the Sorks do anyway?
The north has been given free reign to attack and kill sorks since the 1950s, why does anyone think it will stop now.
I am not a big fan of speading nukes around, but it may be time for the Japs or Sorks to consider either buying an off the shelf nuke from russia or us, or making one of their own.
China will whip the Norks back in line if that were to happen. No nation wasn't foreign nukes on their border, especially china.
Posted by: Ben at November 23, 2010 05:18 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jean at November 23, 2010 05:19 AM (Ja6pC)
on fox, the South Korean president is laying down a threat. Let's hope the north doesn't call it.
He says the next attack will result in an overwhelming counter attack.
I don't think we need war in the Korean Peninsula.
Posted by: Ben at November 23, 2010 05:20 AM (wuv1c)
Enough with the talk. The response should be hundreds of daisy cutters and MOABs over Pyongyang and to their known nuclear sites.
Words mean things, but actions mean more than words.
Posted by: blindside at November 23, 2010 05:22 AM (x7g7t)
blindside. I agree in principal, but do you honestly think we can fight another war at this point? And let's not fool ourselves, we would do most of the fighting, we always do.
Posted by: Ben at November 23, 2010 05:25 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Tightie Rightie at November 23, 2010 05:25 AM (pTOob)
Watching the transition as this story hit...heh.
Time to rearm the Japanese and give nukes to them and the SKoreans. China will wail, but f***'em, they could have reined the NorKs in. They made their increasingly radioactive bed...
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at November 23, 2010 05:26 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 05:26 AM (EiH7n)
Posted by: Barbarian at November 23, 2010 05:26 AM (EL+OC)
blindside. I agree in principal, but do you honestly think we can fight another war at this point? And let's not fool ourselves, we would do most of the fighting, we always do.
Posted by: Ben at November 23, 2010 09:25 AM (wuv1c)
I think you assign too much credit to Da Zero Misadministration. If there is way, South Korea will have to fight it alone. And if the Chinese come in on the Nork side, South Korea is lost.
Posted by: maddogg at November 23, 2010 05:28 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at November 23, 2010 05:29 AM (EiH7n)
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 23, 2010 05:30 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: steevy at November 23, 2010 05:30 AM (48c4n)
Yeah, right. As if that's going to happen.
The Norks have been getting away with this shit for more than a half-century, and the worst they've gotten out of it was a visit from Madeline Albright.
Now that we have the Traitor-in-Chief "leading" us, the response will be tepid at best. It's a game, people, one so-called diplomats love to play. Ratchet up the "tensions," and follow up with babble. The Norks will get some kind of humanitarian aid, weapons from their terrorist buddies, and will strut around like schoolyard bullies, knowing their provocations will go unanswered.
Whichever Kim (Li'l or Junior) is in charge knows this can go on indefinitely.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at November 23, 2010 05:30 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: South Korea at November 23, 2010 05:30 AM (CbwqF)
Posted by: maddogg at November 23, 2010 05:30 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Vic at November 23, 2010 05:31 AM (e4sSD)
ring, ring...ring, ring
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz"
"snork, mmpft, uhhhh, Michelle, would you get that?"
How rude! Doesn't he realize she needs her beauty sleep?
(Of course, he of all people should realize how desperately she needs her beauty sleep...)
Posted by: Book Geek at November 23, 2010 05:31 AM (1+OO5)
Posted by: steevy at November 23, 2010 05:32 AM (48c4n)
Posted by: steevy at November 23, 2010 05:34 AM (48c4n)
Posted by: steevy at November 23, 2010 05:36 AM (48c4n)
Posted by: steevy at November 23, 2010 05:37 AM (48c4n)
Camp Casey is in range of NORK artillery but has a mountain to protect them. Not sure how much of 2nd ID is still there. We got two air bases in the South.
Posted by: Holger/Pelayo at November 23, 2010 05:37 AM (V9Q+f)
Posted by: Mary Cloggerstien from Brattleboro, VT at November 23, 2010 05:42 AM (SZy+Y)
blindside. I agree in principal, but do you honestly think we can fight another war at this point? And let's not fool ourselves, we would do most of the fighting, we always do.
Posted by: Ben at November 23, 2010 09:25 AM (wuv1c)
These kind of provocations MUST have a strong response, otherwise they will continue to escalate. Maybe we should wait until they actually fire a nuke into Seoul or one of the bases with out troops. At which point, a lot of people will lament 'why didn't we do something earlier'.
If there is a fight, we want it to be when WE choose it. I'd have thought we learned that lesson in Europe and the Pacific during WWII, but apparently it has yet to sink in.
If all we are going to do is send angry language, then we might as well
pull out of ROK entirely; I don't want to risk our troops and resources
if we're too chickenshit to use them.
Posted by: blindside at November 23, 2010 05:43 AM (x7g7t)
Posted by: steevy at November 23, 2010 05:43 AM (48c4n)
Posted by: maddogg at November 23, 2010 05:43 AM (OlN4e)
The BBC's diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus says: From the North Korean viewpoint this is about establishing a deterrence strategy over the South and defending its vital interests. An annual South Korean military exercise is under way across the country. The North Koreans demanded that this be halted. And when it went ahead, for whatever reason, this clash erupted.
Really, you fuckknob? You're insinuating that the South Koreans have to stop their military exercises anytime the Norks say so?
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 23, 2010 05:46 AM (2YgNG)
Posted by: Mary Cloggerstien from Brattleboro, VT at November 23, 2010 05:48 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 23, 2010 05:50 AM (2YgNG)
Posted by: logprof at November 23, 2010 05:50 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: steevy at November 23, 2010 05:50 AM (48c4n)
Posted by: Dr.Frank.N.Furter
Yes, it would depend on which side you're on. Kim Jr.'s army has been brainwashed to make the war happen, to want it.
Though Russia warns/cya not to escalate, what would they have in mind already were this to escalate?
"Get in their faces."--Obama
I do wonder what the US Brass in charge of our stationed troops thought beforehand about the S.Korean military exercise location. It isn't as if Kim Jr. wouldn't respond aggressively, everyone knew.
So which S.Korean peace lover previously wanting reunification with the North ordered the exercises conducted at the most northern point in S.Korea? N. Korea didn't need a formal invitation to take part exercising in the war games.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 05:51 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: maddogg at November 23, 2010 09:05 AM (OlN4e)
Not for Comrade Barry. He's donning his Mao jacket and has his little red book in hand and will stand shoulder to shoulder with his comrades
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 23, 2010 05:52 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Y-not has a cold at November 23, 2010 05:52 AM (UcOiF)
Posted by: Y-not has a cold at November 23, 2010 05:54 AM (UcOiF)
And Barry immediately jumped under the bed and hid
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 23, 2010 05:55 AM (1Jaio)
This time, you have me!
Posted by: The manufactured Messiah at November 23, 2010 05:56 AM (1O93r)
Posted by: eman at November 23, 2010 05:56 AM (CbwqF)
Posted by: ApacheWarrior at November 23, 2010 05:56 AM (5zf6S)
Posted by: steevy at November 23, 2010 05:57 AM (48c4n)
Eff it all. I'm done trying to fix the world, when retards at home just want to tear it all down. Let it burn.
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at November 23, 2010 05:58 AM (GBXon)
Yes, the ROK has gotten to the point they could defeat the North. The South has a lot of western military hardware like the M1 Abrams, MLRS and western Aircraft.
Posted by: Holger/Pelayo at November 23, 2010 06:00 AM (V9Q+f)
"After the North is defeated..."
You've forgotten how the Korean War played for the US/UN against China, and the results thereafter in Vietnam, the predecessor "nation building" US exercise in futility.
How is Mr. Retreat O'Malleable in the Oval Office going to defeat anyone, let alone the Nork war machine allied with Red China that won't stop the Norks, and given US intervention, will absolutely ally in battle with the Norks, their miserable 1950s Protégé. Since compassionate progressive Republican reformist GWBush, US Marines and Soldiers in Korea will be required to perform in battle under the same PC defeatist Rules of Engagement as inflicted upon our Military in Islam.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 06:03 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: steevy at November 23, 2010 06:03 AM (48c4n)
PRECISELY
Footnote, Obama means to reform the US Military. That would require conveniently eliminating hard nosed patriotic servicemen and women dedicated still to the concept of loving the USA and our Constitution.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 06:07 AM (H+LJc)
I don't think you will see China get involved in the same way they did last time. Chairman Mao is dead and they have too much to gain from not being involved in such a way.
Posted by: Holger/Pelayo at November 23, 2010 06:08 AM (V9Q+f)
Posted by: Mary Cloggerstien from Brattleboro, VT at November 23, 2010 06:08 AM (SZy+Y)
I wonder what OBambi is going to do? Send Kim a strongly worded letter?
Posted by: runningrn at November 23, 2010 02:11 AM
Harsh language. -- Posted by: rdbrewer
"Words. Just words."
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 06:08 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Mary Cloggerstien from Brattleboro, VT at November 23, 2010 10:08 AM (SZy+Y)
Brattleboro! I've been there. It's the ass wart of the NE. I can see where your attitude comes from.
Posted by: Barbarian at November 23, 2010 06:12 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Holger/Pelayo
"In the same way" doesn't discount China siding with N.Korea as it will, though how they will ally this time isn't known.
Given N.Korea's miserable circumstances with starving masses and nothing but potential free labor for aggressive Chinese industry, we'll see what China determines they have to gain by crashing the US were the US to oblige S.Korea in a North Asian War (that Gates has successfully curtailed our ability to fight beyond 2 fronts at a time).
I doubt that Obama has either the desire or the guts to declare war on anyone. As is, he "inherited" our current military operations.
Obama will leave S.Korea to the UN to protect or not protect, whether or not he provides the UN with US forces.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 06:15 AM (H+LJc)
Since Harry Truman, who actually knew something about war, didn't have the stones to blow the Norks out of the water, what can we expect from someone who knows nothing about anything and basically sympathizes with terrorists, Communists and tin-pot Third World thugs?
This will die down quickly, and the Norks will walk away with another "win."
"Oh, look, Bristol Palin is on DWTS!!11!!!"
Posted by: MrScribbler© at November 23, 2010 06:17 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: MrScribbler
Most likely, of course.
Do note, my last responses rebutted the fallacious idea someone posted that the US would defeat N.Korea in war like WWII.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 06:21 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 10:21 AM
It's only my opinion, but Truman could have stomped the Norks using the vast array of materiel left over from WWII.
We still had a shitload of B-29s and munitions then. A good carpet-bombing of the North would have shut down the Earlier Kim, and there would have been no need to follow Dugout Doug's scheme to carry the war into Red China.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at November 23, 2010 06:26 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Bruce The Robert at November 23, 2010 06:39 AM (hqar6)
Obama would have to come to the South's aid in a military manner. We got treaty commitments with both South Korea and Japan. Obama has to. If he doesn't, he gets defeated in 2012.
As for our military. Our ground forces are not needed as much. The ROK Army is 500,000 strong with about a million reservists. They got plenty of our hardware including 1500 K1 and K1A1 (versions of the Abrams) and about 100 MLRS batteries in addition to about 5000 more artillery. They got 600 combat aircraft (F-15s, F-16s, F-5s and F-4s). 80 percent of their logistics is home-grown. Their total reserves amount to 5 million military and paramilitary troops.
Posted by: Holger/Pelayo at November 23, 2010 06:41 AM (V9Q+f)
Yes, he absolutely should never have conducted the Korean War as he chose to do, against the advice of his military commanders, dismissing MacArthur for subtly/publicly pointing out the obvious, what Truman's plan would mean in the end.
Bombing the nuclear no man's land swath keeping the North in the North would have saved America a lot of misery, death, and grief from that UN engagement sponsored by the US, fighting tooth and nail hand to hand combat with the Chinese for a hill simply to relinquish it time and again ordered by UN directive.
Truman didn't believe his own propaganda after Nagasaki or he'd have re-applied nuclear bombs to prevent massive American deaths that he preferred in Korea.
RE: bombing to prevent augmented warfare, had the US Air Force bombed all the North Vietnam dikes, that war would have ended before it began.
From dominoes to nation building, not much difference given pompous political aspirations for personal profits via never ending military engagements.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 23, 2010 07:03 AM (H+LJc)
"Since the Island's name has always been Taiwan, in the Taiwan Strait, they would have been called Taiwanese all along."
I must have missed the sinking of Formosa.
Posted by: letitbeme at November 23, 2010 07:26 AM (4uDUj)
Posted by: Buffalobob at November 23, 2010 08:07 AM (GwH6h)
- Adm. Josh Painter (Fred Dalton Thompson, Hunt for Red October)
Posted by: Keith Arnold at November 23, 2010 08:22 AM (Jdtsu)
"So I wonder if there's any protests today of South Koreans demanding we leave? They've been doing so for years. I wonder how they'd feel now?"
Yes, I do remember those protests. I remember how they treated the US troops with complete contempt. I remember how the South Korean government and the vast majority of South Koreans looked on with approval.
So forgive me if I don't give a shit about this.
The only people that I am concerned are the troops stationed there and their dependents. I always thought it was a stupid idea to allow dependents to be stationed in what is effectively a war zone. I hope somebody is dusting off the evacuation plans.
I think the world needs a good hard dose of what a emasculated America really means.
I think The One is about to school them.
Posted by: RayJ at November 23, 2010 08:42 AM (YcjCJ)
Posted by: Ken in Kansas at November 23, 2010 08:46 AM (hLKRU)
Posted by: BarryO Bomber, Winged-Warrior-in-Chief at November 23, 2010 08:47 AM (Lz//J)
The dirty little open secret is that SK is a nation with a gun to its head. It survives because of US backing and US troops.
Given the advent of Barry the Wonder Wonk, I can't think this ends well.
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at November 23, 2010 08:48 AM (GBXon)
North Korea probably doesn't have functional nukes, but they have enough artillery that can do equivalent damage to Seoul.
If you were South Korea, would you trust The One to back you up in this situation?
Posted by: RayJ at November 23, 2010 08:50 AM (YcjCJ)
Posted by: Sharkman at November 23, 2010 09:17 AM (sqNU7)
Posted by: Ken in Kansas at November 23, 2010 09:18 AM (hLKRU)
Posted by: Moi at November 23, 2010 09:30 AM (Ez4Ql)
Posted by: Moi at November 23, 2010 09:32 AM (Ez4Ql)
Posted by: Moi at November 23, 2010 09:35 AM (Ez4Ql)
#294, the protests outside Yongsan Garrison in Seoul are the summer tradition for Korean college kids. There are 37 colleges and universities in the Seoul metro area. Most Korean college kids live at home, and have excess energy they can't put into drinking and fucking. Their only outlets are video games and political protests. Their lefty professors (some of whom are subsidized by North Korean front groups) agitate for those protests every year.
Meanwhile the Korean National Police riot teams, who are redneck kids from outside Seoul who didn't get to go to college, beat the shit out of the college kids. Both sides do this for a few years, then get on with their lives.
I did a tour on Yongsan with Honor Guard Company in '99-00, and the college kids were a minor annoyance. I always got along well with all the other locals. I used to go to Kangnam, Inchon, Nandemun, and other parts of the city just to stay away from Itaewon.
I told one of the ROK Army colonels that flying the college kids somewhere like Thailand or the Philippines to drink and fuck would be a better release of tension than beating each other half to death and the occasional Molotov cocktail accident, but he shrugged it off as the way things were.
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 23, 2010 09:37 AM (GgXZc)
"So then are we saying that SK has to wait for permission from Obonzo before it can truly respond?"
Wait. It gets worse.
The Genius in Cheif has been pushing very hard for a "no first use" policy with respect to nuclear weapons.
One should always keep in mind the fact that the North Koreans have a formidable stockpile of chemical weapons and that the US doesn't.
The US has not officially adopted the "no first use" policy with respect to countries like North Korea and Iran but everybody knows that The One will never authorize the use of nuclear weapons in response to chemical weapons being used against US forces.
Everybody assumes that the US would totally dominate the North Koreans in a military encounter, but that really isn't a given if you throw their chemical weapons into the equation.
Posted by: RayJ at November 23, 2010 09:59 AM (YcjCJ)
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 23, 2010 10:00 AM (xy9wk)
Why do I think Obambi is wishing today that he wasn't President. "Why can't we all get along?"
Posted by: Ken in Kansas at November 23, 2010 10:10 AM (hLKRU)
Posted by: sifty, about to buy canned food and bags of grain. at November 23, 2010 10:29 AM (DNbkJ)
Posted by: Mr. Barky at November 23, 2010 11:53 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: moon boots at November 30, 2010 04:18 PM (6PHuf)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2601 seconds, 434 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Anachronda at November 22, 2010 10:08 PM (6fER6)