February 03, 2010
— Ace The Senate wants to delay until next Thursday, despite the fact that Devall Patrick is certifying the election results tomorrow morning.
Brown wants the People's Seat, now.
Brown's legal counsel wrote Gov. Deval Patrick (D-Mass.) and Secretary of State William Galvin asking them to certify the election results immediately, which would allow him to be sworn into the U.S. Senate as early as Thursday."While Senator elect Brown had tentatively planned to be sworn into office February 11, he has been advised that there are a number of votes scheduled prior to that date," his attorneys wrote. "For that reason, he wants certification to occur immediately."
Former and soon-to-be boxing referee Harry Reid says he has no plans to seat a duly elected Senator anytime soon.
Posted by: Ace at
10:39 AM
| Comments (131)
Post contains 138 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Waterhouse at February 03, 2010 10:42 AM (RwPdb)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 10:43 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Vic at February 03, 2010 10:44 AM (QrA9E)
They're making it out like Joe Clownfucker Biden has a busy schedule and is not available until the 11th.
Posted by: This is boner at February 03, 2010 10:44 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: Waste93 at February 03, 2010 10:44 AM (KHM8y)
No one will have standing or it will be decided it's a political question, so nothing will be challengeable.
Posted by: Dr. Spank at February 03, 2010 10:45 AM (0FiCa)
This is the spiteful, petty kind of thing that will piss off a whole lotta people.. I hope Nevadans are watching.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 03, 2010 10:46 AM (f9c2L)
I get a kick out of the Dems in Congress basically saying " We're not behind this, this is a state issue !", when we all no damn well who is exactly behind it, Harry Reid and the Obama Whitehouse. They're trying to delay his seating as long as possible to see what else they can cram down our throats while they still have Kirk's vote.
Posted by: Blazer at February 03, 2010 10:46 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: California Red at February 03, 2010 10:47 AM (7uWb8)
August 25, 2009: Gov Patrick chooses Paul Kirk to replace Kennedy in the Senate.
August 26, 2009: Paul Kirk is sworn in to the United States Senate.
Posted by: This is boner at February 03, 2010 10:47 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 10:48 AM (p302b)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 03, 2010 10:49 AM (IIHY9)
So are those votes made by the other guy invalid and challengeable by "the people" in court?
---------------------
No one will have standing or it will be decided it's a political question, so nothing will be challengeable.
-------------------
Then how about the Senate Rules Committee?
Anyway, don't the people of Massachusetts have standing?
Posted by: arhooley at February 03, 2010 10:50 AM (ElI+6)
Posted by: kansas at February 03, 2010 10:50 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 03, 2010 02:49 PM (IIHY9)
Grill some ribs while you're at it...I eat vicariously through you.
Posted by: Tami at February 03, 2010 10:51 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 03, 2010 10:51 AM (IIHY9)
Who has standing in the Obama birth certificate issue? Not us, the voters.
Posted by: Dr. Spank at February 03, 2010 10:52 AM (0FiCa)
Tell me again how many unelected Democrat Senators we have?
Franken
Burris
Kirk
the asshole from Colorado
the asswipe from Delaware
who else?
Posted by: This is boner at February 03, 2010 10:52 AM (z37MR)
can you say "PROJECTION"?
Posted by: Mord at February 03, 2010 10:52 AM (tTj19)
So sorry no ribs today I have three huge racks for the game Sunday tho', today it's homemade fajitas w/all the fixin's.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 03, 2010 10:53 AM (IIHY9)
Hey dems, Brown was elected because you friggin idiots are too stupid to realize you're digging a hole for your own graves. By not seating him, it proves you're just still digging.
Dem strategy session: "lets piss off the electorate even more, that'll help us".
Posted by: dogcatcher at February 03, 2010 10:54 AM (YbPjr)
1. He's Republican
2. He's WHITE
You'll note that Burris was on the express lane to being sworn in/seated, but then:
1. He's a Democrat
2. He's BLACK
Nuance.
Posted by: GarandFan at February 03, 2010 10:54 AM (ZQBnQ)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 10:55 AM (p302b)
Posted by: quite googleable at February 03, 2010 10:55 AM (EiH7n)
Posted by: Mord at February 03, 2010 10:55 AM (tTj19)
Posted by: Vic at February 03, 2010 10:55 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 03, 2010 02:53 PM (IIHY9)
Daa-amn!
Posted by: Tami at February 03, 2010 10:55 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: t-bone at February 03, 2010 10:56 AM (Xpxvu)
C'mon, we knew the rat-bastards would be pulling this shit. The RNC should have been agitating for this for 4 days, why is Brown having to do this himself?
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 03, 2010 10:56 AM (fx8sm)
Can't watch the tube, is at least Fox all over this?
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 03, 2010 10:56 AM (DIYmd)
Brown to Senate: Seat Me, Now on laceyunderalls a/k/a grouchyunderalls.
I'm pretty sure that's what he actually said.
I just wanted to get the record straight.
Posted by: grouchyunderalls at February 03, 2010 10:56 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 10:57 AM (p302b)
Harry "this war is lost" Reid (oh wait... - this war is NOT lost! we won! Iraqis won! - no thanks to rat-fucks like Harry Reid)
ahem - Harry "this war is lost" Reid is just jealous because his days as a US Senator are fucking numbered. heh.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 03, 2010 10:59 AM (0fzsA)
Damn good idea. Wish'd the RNC woulda thought of it....
37 Brown should put out a commercial in MA showing how fast all these other Senators were seated and asking them to contact the White House, the Senate, the governor of MA, the secretary of state of MA to ask why he isn't being seated, why he is somehow considered a second class senator.
Posted by: skye at February 03, 2010 11:00 AM (HwMXR)
Posted by: dagny at February 03, 2010 11:01 AM (lEkVh)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:03 AM (p302b)
Posted by: dagny at February 03, 2010 11:04 AM (lEkVh)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:05 AM (p302b)
Nobody will have the stones to stop him.
Posted by: looking closely at February 03, 2010 11:05 AM (6Q9g2)
What if Brown just shows up in Washington first things tomorrow AM and starts voting?
Love to see that. See if dingy reid has the stones to bar the duly elected Senator from the chamber.
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 03, 2010 11:06 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: runningrn at February 03, 2010 11:06 AM (CfmlF)
He doesn't have that little card that identifies him as a senator, his credentials and you know what happens when you just show up at a government office and if you don't, ask that O'Keefe guy.
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:07 AM (p302b)
I would like to seat Scott Brown, among other things.
This morning we declared today Tell Someone/Something To Go To Hell Day. I'm willing to bump that if we can instead declare it Seat Scott Brown in an Upright Position so the Moronettes Can Take Care of Him Day.
Look at how well I share!
Posted by: grouchyunderalls at February 03, 2010 11:07 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 03, 2010 11:07 AM (IIHY9)
I don't think so.
The world of professional boxing does have standards to maintain.
Posted by: shibumi at February 03, 2010 11:08 AM (OKZrE)
This could be fun. I know, I know that we indulge in this picture a lot but Can you imagine if the republicans with a republican president refused to seat a duely elected senator for political reasons? Wow!
Why does crazy Joe have to be there anyway?
If the president can be sworn in on a plane by some judge why do we need avatar Joe to be there for Brown?
Posted by: dagny at February 03, 2010 11:09 AM (lEkVh)
Lets see Senate security throw him out (ie with ten other Republican Senators vouching for him in person).
Better yet, lets also see the Democrats refuse to let him on the floor to vote.
Posted by: looking closely at February 03, 2010 11:09 AM (6Q9g2)
What if Brown just shows up in Washington first things tomorrow AM and starts voting?
Nobody will have the stones to stop him.
Well that's nice in theory. But the votes aren't worth squat until they certify him.
Posted by: grouchyunderalls at February 03, 2010 11:09 AM (pLTLS)
Arianna? If you're reading this? I'm kidding.
Posted by: Crusty at February 03, 2010 11:09 AM (GvSpB)
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 03, 2010 11:10 AM (fx8sm)
Look at how well I share!
Me first
Posted by: dagny at February 03, 2010 11:10 AM (lEkVh)
Posted by: Senator Burris at February 03, 2010 11:11 AM (+zo63)
Why does crazy Joe have to be there anyway?
Remember when the dncmedia gave Gov Palin shit for saying the VP's duties include presiding over the Senate chamber?
Yeah, well, SHE WAS RIGHT.
Posted by: This is boner at February 03, 2010 11:11 AM (z37MR)
Hey, call Harry Reid's office at 202-224-3542 and demand this. I've called and a lot of friends have called. You should too.
Oh, it won't help. But it will be fun!
Posted by: pronotcon at February 03, 2010 11:11 AM (nF4Jh)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 03, 2010 11:12 AM (IIHY9)
I would still like to see Joe take over from Obama for the rest of his term. It would be dangerous in a crazy way but funny as shit. Have you seen his avatar review? Almost laughed myself sick. Stand up Chuck!
Sit DOWN BROWN!
Posted by: dagny at February 03, 2010 11:12 AM (lEkVh)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:13 AM (p302b)
In theory "Senator" Kirk isn't one, and shouldn't be voting right now.
If his votes count, why should Brown's not count?
Posted by: looking closely at February 03, 2010 11:13 AM (6Q9g2)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 03, 2010 11:14 AM (IIHY9)
Posted by: dagny at February 03, 2010 11:15 AM (lEkVh)
how? The NY Post si saying this: "Schumer's approval rating at 58 percent: poll"
Unless you plan to talk them into voting for term limits, he is such a lock, it's scary.
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:16 AM (p302b)
This is the spiteful, petty kind of thing that will piss off a whole lotta people.. I hope Nevadans are watching.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 03, 2010 02:46 PM (f9c2L)
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? We are soooo watching this that we are DONE watching and he is toast! But make no mistake, he has NOT concluded he is going to lose his seat. He is FAAAAAR to deluded and arrogant for that. This guy has been NOTHING good for Nevadans....right down to FORCING financing for City Center that will result in default. Just like all the forced mortgages for unqualified buyers. He called in favors to keep City Center financed and it is a boondogal....Now we will all look at that failed project...OH No we won't! Obama told everyone not to spend money here agian....so crickets in a ghost town!
Posted by: rightzilla at February 03, 2010 11:16 AM (rVJH4)
To be fair to Harry, Brown isn't black and he isn't from Illinois and he didn't pay for his Senate seat so there's no reason to rush this.
Posted by: andycanuck at February 03, 2010 11:18 AM (2qU2d)
It would be dangerous in a crazy way but funny as shit.
It would be a lot more safe than now with the jugeared jackass in there actively trying to destroy the country.
Posted by: Vic at February 03, 2010 11:18 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 03, 2010 11:18 AM (ekqTc)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:19 AM (p302b)
Posted by: dagny at February 03, 2010 11:19 AM (lEkVh)
No, sorry, this is not possible. Please have your ears checked and try again. Barney "Gums" Frank has been certified by global warming scientists as having the Most Irritating Voice in the World.
As for Brown vs, the bored Senate, this is being done on purpose. Everything these crap-bags is done on purpose. That's one thing, but the Other Thing is that their purpose is to ruin this country and turn us all into Welfare Morons.
all of us, as opposed to the 40 percent or so they've already de-brained
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 03, 2010 11:20 AM (JrRME)
I beg to differ with you my friend, he served in the Armed Forces, he more than paid for that seat.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 03, 2010 11:20 AM (IIHY9)
Mr. Brown will be seated on February 4, 2011; not to worry!
Posted by: Harry Reid at February 03, 2010 11:21 AM (8g9qq)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 03, 2010 11:21 AM (ekqTc)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 03, 2010 11:22 AM (bN5ZU)
I beg to differ with you my friend, he served in the Armed Forces, he more than paid for that seat.
Hmmm. So, I get a Senate seat, too?
( II Corps, 7 September 1972-30 March 1973 )
How many interns do I get?
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 03, 2010 11:23 AM (JrRME)
# 22,
Add NY Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand to the unelected list (she was appointed to Hillary's seat when Hillary became the useless Secretary of State).
Posted by: RickZ at February 03, 2010 11:24 AM (Kqw0g)
79 I think that there may be a touch of comedy in Barney but none in Schumer. Schumer makes my skin crawl. Barney does too but in a less scary more ridiculous way, e.g. when I see Barney it's more of a "are you friggin kidding me that those assholes keep electing this pathetic creep" and Schumer is more of a "grab your wallets and your guns, this guy is dangerous."
Posted by: dagny at February 03, 2010 11:24 AM (lEkVh)
Posted by: docj at February 03, 2010 11:24 AM (dt6br)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 03, 2010 11:24 AM (ekqTc)
And there might actually be a market for "Bat-Shit Crazies of the DNC" with Joey Plugs Biden as Mr. April--as in Fool.
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at February 03, 2010 11:24 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: vai2112 at February 03, 2010 11:25 AM (TcILN)
"The announced Republican challengers - Lazio for Governor and Blakeman for Senator - don't show much oomph at this stage. Are they the best the GOP has to offer?"
President Obama, Sen. Schumer Approval
New York State voters approve 57 percent to 38 percent of the job President Obama is doing, compared to 59 percent to 36 percent Dec. 15.
U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer deserves to be reelected this year, voters say 54 percent to 33 percent. Voters approve 58 percent to 30 percent of the job he is doing, down from 62 percent to 27 percent in December."
From the NY Post article I linked above. I can see Paris why you said that.
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:25 AM (p302b)
Can I hitch a ride?
Posted by: alexthechick at February 03, 2010 11:28 AM (8WZWv)
Watch his eyes: Like a deranged ferret, always looking for something to bite / eat / gnaw on
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 03, 2010 11:28 AM (JrRME)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:28 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 03, 2010 11:30 AM (ekqTc)
Posted by: dagny at February 03, 2010 03:19 PM (lEkVh)
He was a gaming commish. I am sure he is in possession of certain information. Fun to read commision meeting transcripts from back in the day too. And the WHY may be just as you assert because I can think of no other reason for it to be him.....especially given teh republican nature of the state back in his early years. AND since he is an artificial Mormon (convert), he does not enjoy the committment of the church body a cradle Mormon would.
Posted by: rightzilla at February 03, 2010 11:32 AM (rVJH4)
Just put in a request and we'll channel it up the chain of command
Thanks. No Monica-esque gals, though: Not that there's anything wrong with That, but I like a lean & hungry look with a slightly bent personna: Kate Moss meets Amy Winehouse meets Gwen Stefani on a Bad Day
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 03, 2010 11:32 AM (JrRME)
Posted by: exdem13 at February 03, 2010 11:33 AM (lYKj1)
Seat Scott Brown in an Upright Position so the Moronettes Can Take Care of Him Day.
I fully support this position.
Posted by: Laura Castellano at February 03, 2010 11:34 AM (fuw6p)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 03, 2010 11:34 AM (PcRSS)
Posted by: Ira at February 03, 2010 11:34 AM (bJm7W)
I don't see how this is a smart move by the Dems. They're just giving their opponants something to tee of at them over for a week.
Off topic, but I just have to mention this somewhere: I know it's probably best to link to Andrew Sullivan as little as possible, but he had another deranged outburst over Palin and Trig today. This time he's claiming the name "Trig" was chosen by Sarah Palin in order to mock the baby!
Get a load of this quote from is blog today: "The medical term for Down Syndrome is Trisomy-21 or Trisomy-g. It is often shortened in medical slang to Tri-g.
Is it not perfectly possible that the very name given to this poor child, being reared by Bristol, is another form of mockery of his condition, along with the "retarded baby" tag?"
He really needs to get socked around for this one, IMO. The man is truly disturbed.
Posted by: franticflintstone at February 03, 2010 11:34 AM (VGbp5)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 03:28 PM (p302b)
According to a page on his website he was re-elected in 2004...so he's up this year.
"After New Yorkers re-elected him in 2004, Chuck was awarded two powerful posts by his colleagues."
Posted by: Tami at February 03, 2010 11:35 AM (VuLos)
Haven't we heard this song before, recently even.
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:35 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 03, 2010 11:38 AM (ekqTc)
Posted by: Madame Speaker Nancy Pelosi at February 03, 2010 11:41 AM (6uiF7)
Posted by: The Chicken at February 03, 2010 11:41 AM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:42 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:45 AM (p302b)
Posted by: rightzilla at February 03, 2010 11:51 AM (rVJH4)
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 11:52 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Sweetsrender at February 03, 2010 12:00 PM (rVDlM)
Rush said that today too.
Posted by: runningrn at February 03, 2010 12:00 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Catherine at February 03, 2010 12:03 PM (dc4hq)
But my question is now really about how you run against one or both of them? This seems like a VERY bizarre thing, and more difficult for a challenger.
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 03, 2010 12:16 PM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: runningrn at February 03, 2010 12:22 PM (CfmlF)
How does Schumer manage that? To have a lock on his office and not even have to worry about re election one little bit? I heard she is not so popular. Someone said that ol hill might come back to get her seat back. Apparently she has so many minders she's kinda lost her power and the idea of being back in the Senate again is very tantalizing to her.
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 12:29 PM (p302b)
Posted by: dagny at February 03, 2010 12:31 PM (lEkVh)
In 2010, Luck: Republicans will concentrate on Gillibrand, who has less name recog and looks like a hapless campaigner. The big cats always look for the weakest zebra...
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 03, 2010 12:40 PM (JrRME)
This video made me wonder if elliot will challenge her in the primary. Colbert's last line was hysterical and so apros pos.
Posted by: curious at February 03, 2010 12:46 PM (p302b)
he isn't from Illinois and he didn't pay for his Senate seat so there's no reason to rush this
I beg to differ with you my friend, he served in the Armed Forces, he more than paid for that seat.
I was (sarc.) referencing Roland Burris's corrupt appointment and his expedited seating, gentlemen, and not Senator Brown. (Who, Ace writes, is going to be seated tomorrow.)
Posted by: andycanuck at February 03, 2010 01:20 PM (2qU2d)
Posted by: SarahW at February 03, 2010 01:23 PM (CSrvi)
I don't trust any politician from a state north of the Mason-Dixon Line or west of the Rockies.
Posted by: Guest at February 03, 2010 06:10 PM (ITzbJ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2495 seconds, 259 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Brown should have been seated immediately, and 10-days (for absentee ballots) at the latest. That was the 29th of January.
Had Brown been seated properly, they wouldnÂ’t have passed the debt increase. Or approved one of the crappy nominations Obama was forcing.
Dems are delaying trying to use KirkÂ’s vote to get as much done as possible, and Kirk shouldnÂ’t even be in the Senate since the 19th according to Massachusetts law that gave him the seat.
Posted by: enoxo at February 03, 2010 10:41 AM (EeTKF)