December 27, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Apparently the theme of the day here is government overregulation (see this post below). I'm seeing a lot of chatter today about the coming demise of incandescent lightbulbs in California and it reminds me of a scene in Alien 3, as things tend to do, when the luckless prisoners realize they lack the basics of modern life. "Nothing much works here," whines a proto-corpse. Ripley snarks back: "Do we have the capacity to make fire? Most humans have enjoyed that privilege since the stone age."
Well, California is banning a staple of human civilization for 130 years: the incandescent lightbulb. Starting on January 1, it will be illegal to sell 100-watt incandescent lightbulbs in California. In the following years, 75-watt, 60-watt and 40-watt bulbs will also be banned. Instead, consumers will have to use expensive halogen bulbs or toxic compact flourescent lightbulbs.
The CFL movement is rooted in the idea that they last longer, uses 28 percent less energy and provide the same amount of light as Thomas Edison's incandescent invention.But there are problems with CFLs that might make you want to buy, or choose, an incandescent light bulb. A six pack of incandescent bulbs runs about $5 where CFLs cost about $3 each. CFLs contain toxic mercury and require special disposal.
Popular Mechanics magazine found that CFLs commonly fail because they are installed in inappropriate lighting fixtures. They can also wear out prematurely because they are turned on and off frequently or experience excessive vibration or impact.
The results are predictable. First, there will be a short-term black market in lightbulbs, I kid you not. Individuals will bring lightbulbs with them when they return from other states. California will no doubt respond by banning their importation and the highway patrol can start checking returning vehicles for them like the fruits and vegetables checkpoint on the way back from Vegas.
Second, twenty years from now the enviroweenies that set us up for this in the first place will be pissing their pants and causing a great stink about all the mercury poisoning. Guaranteed. And, shockingly, it will turn out that converting to CFLs didn't actually save much energy anyway.
Don't be too smug about this taking place in California, though. A nation-wide phase-out of incandescent lightbulbs will begin in 2012, courtesy of a law signed by President Bush in 2007. California is just ahead of the curve.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
07:03 AM
| Comments (184)
Post contains 412 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: toby928™ at December 27, 2010 07:11 AM (S5YRY)
Posted by: King Barak Hussein Obama I (The Great) at December 27, 2010 07:11 AM (8y9MW)
Pretty soon there will be Light Bulb Mules from Mexico smuggling incandescent light bulbs into california in their anuses.
It'll happen.
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 07:13 AM (wuv1c)
I bet Reagan is rolling over in his grave so fast, because of what GE has become, that he could generate enough energy for the Western Sea-board all on his own.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 27, 2010 07:14 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: toby928™ at December 27, 2010 07:14 AM (S5YRY)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 27, 2010 07:15 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 27, 2010 07:15 AM (tf9Ne)
This is indeed the sort of thing that breaks the camel's back. What happens in DC seems remote to the average person. The Fed? What's that?
However, mess with a person's light bulbs, or toilet, and they are reminded every day of just how overweening and incompetent the boobs that make our laws really are.
Posted by: pep at December 27, 2010 07:15 AM (8lSIO)
Posted by: zmdavid at December 27, 2010 07:16 AM (9Pzkk)
I keep seeing those GE commercials about how kewl their electric car recharging stations are, and I find it hard to resist yelling at the screen: "Where is the electricity coming from, morons?!" (Not to be confused with Morons, for whom I have at least a little respect).
I bet Reagan is rolling over in his grave so fast, because of what GE has become, that he could generate enough energy for the Western Sea-board all on his own
Every once in a great while I will talk with someone who is liberal by default(meaning they haven't given it any thought) and they'll always explain to me the benefits of converting to electric. Then I burst their bubble by explaining that the wall socket isn't some magical outlet that is powered by unicorn farts.
Most of our electricity is nuclear and coal.
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 07:16 AM (wuv1c)
Well put. The bottom line is that if the CFLs are as good as the ecoNazis say they are, then compulsion isn't needed to get people to buy them.
Posted by: pep at December 27, 2010 07:17 AM (8lSIO)
I won't allow this topic to pass by without noting that the architect of the ban is the sainted Fred Upton, who was punished for his big-government idiocy by being named Chairman of the House Fucking Energy Committee that regulates the cheap and useful fucking lightbulbs that he fucking banned.
Dropped the ball on this one, there, Boehner.
Posted by: Lou at December 27, 2010 07:18 AM (IH3P2)
Posted by: Jeffrey Quick at December 27, 2010 07:18 AM (g9neE)
OTOH- I happen to like CFL bulbs. The one's I've used (primarily in my Living Room and various bedrooms) work just fine and provide plenty of light. What makes me angry is that I don't have a choice about it. Or, rather, soon won't.
I do to in certain areas. All of my outdoor lightbulbs(with exception of spot light) are CFLS. They've been out there for going on three years.
I also have CFLs in a lot of my lamps. The only place I still use incandescent lightbulbs in my bathroom, kitchen and reading lights.
Obviously incandescents are superior when it comes to needing light for detailed tasks. Reading, shaving, cooking, etc. However if it is just background lighting for a room, the CFL's are more than adequate.
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 07:19 AM (wuv1c)
I doubt if it is that high, especially in the South where almost all homes are totally electric.
I did a "back of the envelope" calc several years ago and figured if every home in the US switched to CFLs it would not be enough savings in electricity to offset even one of the coal plants that they have prevented from opening this year alone.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 07:20 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Bob Marley at December 27, 2010 07:20 AM (BHLuE)
Posted by: Ian S. at December 27, 2010 07:20 AM (YfKOn)
I won't allow this topic to pass by without noting that the architect of the ban is the sainted Fred Upton, who was punished for his big-government idiocy by being named Chairman of the House Fucking Energy Committee that regulates the cheap and useful fucking lightbulbs that he fucking banned.
Dropped the ball on this one, there, Boehner.
On that subject, can you name me one good thing Boehner or McConnell has accomplished so far? In terms of appointments? Rule changes? or accomplishments in the lame duck session?
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 07:20 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Louis Tully at December 27, 2010 07:21 AM (K/USr)
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 27, 2010 07:21 AM (DLxD/)
On that subject, can you name me one good thing Boehner or McConnell has accomplished so far? In terms of appointments? Rule changes? or accomplishments in the lame duck session?
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 11:20 AMNo.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 27, 2010 07:23 AM (Ulu3i)
Repeal!
Of course, it won't matter much if no one makes incandescent lightbulbs anymore.
Posted by: zmdavid at December 27, 2010 07:23 AM (9Pzkk)
The ones I have bought break easily and burn out quickly, which kind of defeats the purpose for something far more expensive. (and my electricity costs have not gone down).
Posted by: ed at December 27, 2010 07:24 AM (Urhve)
Correction: Most of our power comes from Oil and Coal. We only get a significant minority of our power from Nuclear plants.
Posted by: Lou at December 27, 2010 11:18 AM (IH3P2)
Yeah, I'm pretty sure we'll all be sorely disappointed by the 112th Congress. Hopefully the Conservative Insurgency will show appropriate signs of life, but they're outnumbered and (due to seniority issues) out-gunned.
Knowing may, indeed, be half the battle. The other half is superior numbers and fire-power.
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 11:19 AM (wuv1c)
I don't even mind them for reading. They do suck in the bathroom, though. I don't like shaving with my face still half in the dark. It's just a thing I have- I don't think I look good with scraps of tissue paper all over my face.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 27, 2010 07:24 AM (8y9MW)
Only 9% of household electricity is used in lighting.
I doubt if it is that high, especially in the South where almost all homes are totally electric.
I did a "back of the envelope" calc several years ago and figured if every home in the US switched to CFLs it would not be enough savings in electricity to offset even one of the coal plants that they have prevented from opening this year alone.
yeah, i am a real miser when it comes to energy. I do everything I can to save money. I would estimate that my appliances and lighting accounts for 5-10% of my electric bill.
Certain appliances use more juice than others. HD TV's use more than the old CRT's. I've also found that many of those energy star appliances don't really save you as much as they claim.
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 07:25 AM (wuv1c)
I'm just going back to coal-oil lamps. Or whale oil--yeah, whale oil, even better.
Hobo fat burns longer and cleaner.
Posted by: Cicero at December 27, 2010 07:25 AM (Ys0KI)
When the good little lefties rail about the evils of corporations, ask them why they seem to forget GE (We Bring Good Things to Obama) , Apple, Nike, the Entertainment Media corporations, and of course their New Best Friend GM
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 07:25 AM (vdfwz)
I don't even mind them for reading. They do suck in the bathroom, though. I don't like shaving with my face still half in the dark. It's just a thing I have- I don't think I look good with scraps of tissue paper all over my face.
Yeah, I can't use them for reading. Then again my vision isn't 100%. maybe that has something to do with it. When it's nice I read outside as sunlight is the perfect lighting for reading, but incandescent is a close 2nd.
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 07:26 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 11:20 AM (wuv1c)
Boehner's powerless until he gets the gavel. The House is too majoritarian for him to do anything substantive.
As for McConnell, getting the omnibus scrapped was probably his biggest victory, with saving the tax rates not far behind. Once it was decided by Democrats and the MFM (BIRM) that the lame-duck session was going to be where the real work gets done, Dingy Harry called out the moderate Republicans on voting for DADT and food safety, and they had no choice but to buckle. START was a nonfactor and political football.
As for appointments, confirming the nonentities while killing the bids of the liberal firebrands like Goodwin Liu and Jack McConnell is enough of a victory for me. I'm second to few in my distaste for McConnell, but he did pretty well with the circumstances.
Posted by: Lou at December 27, 2010 07:26 AM (IH3P2)
Posted by: Fritz at December 27, 2010 07:26 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 07:27 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 27, 2010 07:27 AM (DLxD/)
Also, I don't think the companies that pushed for this (and you know it was companies that pushed for this) thought things all the way through. If they really do all last for 5 years (the claim: 3 years is more like it, but that's still a lot longer than an incandescent), how are these companies going to keep money coming in?
Won't it be like those stupid gum commercials where the company goes out of business because no one is chewing their second piece of gum yet?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 27, 2010 07:28 AM (8y9MW)
BoB marathon on Spike. The part where they are taking off for the jump into Normandy and the music gives me chills.
shit. at work.
I really need to buy the set. I've seen it a hundred times and i never get tired of it.
I also need to give The Pacific another shot. I stopped watching it after the third episode because it was so stupid. Maybe it got better
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 07:29 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: t-bird at December 27, 2010 07:29 AM (kho+0)
Side note, incandescent bulbs are made in this country, CFLs in China.
Green Jobs!
Posted by: toby928™ at December 27, 2010 07:29 AM (S5YRY)
And produce a whole lot less hot air.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 27, 2010 07:31 AM (8y9MW)
When it's nice I read outside as sunlight is the perfect lighting for reading,
Until you walk back inside.
"Damn it's dark in here"!
Posted by: HH at December 27, 2010 07:31 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: Sparky at December 27, 2010 07:31 AM (r0u40)
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 27, 2010 07:31 AM (XBM1t)
Posted by: drizzler's battlefield buddy at December 27, 2010 07:32 AM (0YS61)
Think DiCaprio and the other Phonywood tree huggers considered the consequences when the theaters have to jack up ticket prices which they won't get a cut from? And if ticket prices are 30 bucks before the overpriced popcorn and Raisinettes, and Pepsis which will no doubt soon be outlawed in theaters, will people shell out that much to watch the crap which seems to mandate that every comedy film has to either have Ben Stiller or Will Farrell in it?
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 07:32 AM (vdfwz)
Meh - not so sure about that last one. We seem to be good at Tyranny Phase One, which is Government Overreach, but we seem to be rather poor at Tyranny Phase Two, which is Heavyhanded Government Enforcement. Most likely people will buy incandescent bulbs from over the border, the law banning them won't be enforced, and we will just have another useless law on the books that everyone ignores and which serves to undermine respect for the law generally.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 27, 2010 07:32 AM (mOLjN)
Posted by: drizzler's battlefield buddy at December 27, 2010 07:33 AM (0YS61)
Posted by: Bill R. at December 27, 2010 07:33 AM (EhlQq)
Posted by: JEA at December 27, 2010 07:33 AM (YWRHb)
Posted by: ya2daup at December 27, 2010 07:34 AM (yRrAd)
Posted by: Lincolntf (channeling Larry King) at December 27, 2010 07:36 AM (T+5rr)
The money would just go into taxes to pay for the welfare freebies you're getting anyway
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 07:37 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: Fritz at December 27, 2010 07:37 AM (GwPRU)
Heh! I added another attic just to store lightbulbs.
So when I'm looking for you needing to buy a few, should I ask for Mr. Lucifer?
Posted by: HH at December 27, 2010 07:37 AM (6oDXl)
Evidently, you're too stupid to know a hoax when you see one. But you just go right ahead and waste your money on those bulbs, you dim bulb.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 27, 2010 07:37 AM (gNBvj)
Posted by: the newly reformed, practical House GOP at December 27, 2010 07:37 AM (AZGON)
Popular Mechanics magazine found that CFLs commonly fail because they are installed in inappropriate lighting fixtures. They can also wear out prematurely because they are turned on and off frequently or experience excessive vibration or impact.
What are Californians going to put in their ceiling fans, garage door openers, refrigerators and freezers?
Posted by: Ed Anger at December 27, 2010 07:38 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: chemjeff at December 27, 2010 07:38 AM (mOLjN)
Posted by: chemjeff at December 27, 2010 11:32 AM
Nope.
Heavy-handed enforcement of stupid laws is what our government does best. I'm pretty certain that mandates to use CFLs and drive electric cars will be followed up with heavy fines for violators. It's another form of taxation, as well as a way to keep the masses cowed and miserable.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 27, 2010 07:38 AM (Ulu3i)
Most of our electricity is nuclear and coal.
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 11:16 AM (wuv1c)
Actually that IS true since coal is app 50% and Nuke is about 19% (as of 2005)
Nat Gas is also 19% and hydro is 7%. solar and wind are not even on scale.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 07:39 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at December 27, 2010 07:39 AM (IEJ4J)
Posted by: JEA's buddy RayKon at December 27, 2010 07:40 AM (vdfwz)
Evidently, conservatives are going to be sitting in the dark because they're too stupid and too principled to replace burned bulbs with new ones that will save them money.
Posted by: JEA at December 27, 2010 11:33 AM (YWRHb)
Kiss my ass, statist tool.
Posted by: ya2daup at December 27, 2010 07:40 AM (yRrAd)
Posted by: Clownifornian, dreaming at December 27, 2010 07:41 AM (AZGON)
oh, don't worry, it'll get better. The same idiots who are pushing electric cars, etc can count on the environuts to go to court to block any effort to produce "clean" electricity. Is there anything cleaner than hydroelectric? Nope, bad for fish. Solar panels in the desert? Might threaten the pastel desert tortoise. Windmills (or whatever they call them these days)? Nope, threatens endangered Indiana bats in West Viriginia: google donsurber + "indiana bats" and you'll get this: "Work on a West Virginia wind power project has been halted by a federal judge who sided with environmentalistsÂ’ claim that the project would harm an endangered bat."
Maybe the best thing to do is stock up on those cfl bulbs whenever a going-out-of-business sale makes them only twice the price of regular bulbs.
Posted by: mallfly at December 27, 2010 07:41 AM (W6bJb)
Posted by: drizzler's battlefield buddy at December 27, 2010 11:32 AM (0YS61)
Not everyone can store a cache of old-style lightbulbs in their asshole like you can, dbf.
Posted by: The Drizzle at December 27, 2010 07:41 AM (ysCLj)
1) Conservatives thought they were "mostly harmless" and ignored them too long.
2) By the time Conservatives started saying, "but that's stupid," it was "well known" that the EnviroNazis had "the best intentions" so telling the truth about them was "mean."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 27, 2010 07:43 AM (8y9MW)
Corn oil, so we can starve the messicans faster than just using bio fuels
Posted by: TC at December 27, 2010 07:43 AM (DYJjQ)
Most of our electricity is nuclear and coal.
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 11:16 AMScotland is suddenly getting all of theirs from nukes too;
Heh, Scotland's Magic Windmills fail
SCOTLAND'S wind farms are unable to cope with the freezing weather conditions – grinding to a halt at a time when electricity demand is at a peak, forcing the country to rely on power generated by French nuclear plants.
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 07:44 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 27, 2010 07:44 AM (XBM1t)
Posted by: George Orwell at December 27, 2010 07:44 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 27, 2010 07:44 AM (T+5rr)
Just proves that the eco-tards really don't give a damn about the environment. The two main factions of the eco movement are the communists and the anarchists.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 07:45 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at December 27, 2010 07:45 AM (6SIms)
Posted by: JEA at December 27, 2010 11:33 AM (YWRHb)
It's not an aversion to saving money , dickface, it's the fact that the fucking government is telling us how to light our houses. Just because you need the government to wipe your ass for you doesnt mean the rest of us want it.
Posted by: The Drizzle at December 27, 2010 07:46 AM (ysCLj)
Posted by: Bill R. at December 27, 2010 11:33 AM (EhlQq)
Same here. Fuck 'em. Does anyone remember the movies about mutant killer bears made that way from mercury poisoning. Damn enviroweenies can't make up there 'tard minds. I hate flourescent lighting. It sucks the fucking life out of me.
Posted by: Soona at December 27, 2010 07:46 AM (p00j9)
Posted by: Doug at December 27, 2010 07:46 AM (gUGI6)
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 27, 2010 07:47 AM (XBM1t)
Watch out for the calls of more federal regulation regarding the compatibility of home lighting fixtures re CFLs.
Don't be too smug about this taking place in California, though. A nation-wide phase-out of incandescent lightbulbs will begin in 2012, courtesy of a law signed by President Bush in 2007. California is just ahead of the curve.
Clownifornia is generally the place where bad trends begin before they spread East.
Laws such as this are why I don't recollect on the Bush years that fondly. Sure, Bush is Reagan compared to Obama and while Bush had some good standing on tax cuts, he didn't even hinder the spread of socialism much. All Bush did was mildly negate the effects of enviro-wacko legislation (for example, Clinton signed an EO saying all appliances had to be x-more energy efficent, while Bush signed his own EO mildly reducing the requirement by x minus y more energy efficient - still the regulation went forward).
Bush should have taken moderation in moderation and ditched the "Compassionate Conservative" shtick. Alas.
Posted by: Barry (AJ) Obama at December 27, 2010 07:47 AM (9hSKh)
Also that Barry is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure?
Posted by: that guy that doesn't read all the comments at December 27, 2010 07:48 AM (S5YRY)
91 How the hell am I supposed to keep my water pump from freezing now?
Why do you need running water? Don't you know that requires energy, which the production of makes Gaia bleed?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 27, 2010 07:48 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Charles Ansel Johnson at December 27, 2010 07:48 AM (vdfwz)
How many Easybake ovens out there are making 8 year old girls renegade outlaws?
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at December 27, 2010 07:48 AM (zdaIQ)
I have the sickness of taking things apart and conducting failure analysis'.
I have a collection obout ~10 ballasts that I need to mail to GE. The only problem is that it will take about $15 to mail these fucking parts to china.
Screw that, I will just have to relamp the basement with T8's, you know, the four footers that have real ballasts. They say you can grow weed under them, but that's another story.
Posted by: sTevo at December 27, 2010 07:49 AM (hEEpQ)
Posted by: t-bird at December 27, 2010 07:50 AM (kho+0)
Can't wait until they're smack in the middle of Nantucket Shoals in the Atlantic ocean. I'm sure those suckers will be wicked easy to maintain/fix.
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 27, 2010 07:50 AM (T+5rr)
Posted by: Jean at December 27, 2010 07:50 AM (afNI7)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 27, 2010 11:48 AM
Behold, a god who bleeds!
Posted by: Kalish the Star Trek Indian at December 27, 2010 07:50 AM (vdfwz)
I am really starting to resent this country.
Posted by: Sam at December 27, 2010 07:51 AM (Cxsey)
Ben, BoB was on sale on Amazon yesterday for around $35 on Blu-Ray! Damn good deal.
I'll have to check it out. I always get so excited when they do a marathon on spike, i might as well own them myself at this point.
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 07:52 AM (wuv1c)
The same thing applies to probably 95% of failures of flat-screen plasma or LCD TVs and computer monitors. Chinese capacitors are a menace.
Posted by: Ian S. at December 27, 2010 07:52 AM (YfKOn)
Posted by: Jean at December 27, 2010 07:52 AM (afNI7)
Posted by: George Orwell at December 27, 2010 11:44 AM
You are NOT of the Body!
Posted by: The Macolytes at December 27, 2010 07:55 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 11:44 AM (vdfwz)
Now THAT was a great article! Scotland won't have anything to do with Nuclear Power, at least on their own soil, but when their wind power doesn't work, they import it from France.
Oh, and their wind generating capacity during this cold spell has dropped to less than 6%.
If that happened to me at work, get me to a hospital!
Posted by: HH at December 27, 2010 07:55 AM (6oDXl)
It must be rendered first.
It's becoming more and more apparent that Bush laid his plank right up the ass of the American public. Thanks again George.
Posted by: Barbarian at December 27, 2010 07:56 AM (EL+OC)
Of course, Microsoft's used a "Recycle Bin" since before many of us had to deal with that hassle in real life. I suspect it's actually because both companies are based in well-known hippy hot zones.
Posted by: Ian S. at December 27, 2010 07:58 AM (YfKOn)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 07:58 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: Richard at December 27, 2010 08:00 AM (u8f90)
So you libs who laugh about candles can go suck an egg. I am burning them in the evenings until March or so, when it will finally warm up around here.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 27, 2010 08:01 AM (Fo83G)
Posted by: sTevo at December 27, 2010 08:01 AM (hEEpQ)
Posted by: George Orwell at December 27, 2010 08:01 AM (AZGON)
This seems like a good time to mention the consumer product safety act of a couple years ago, that mandated extensive lead testing in every product sold for children and literally led to mandated destruction of anything made before a certain date, even in lieu of donation to charity.
Ah yes, because government knows best. Every phoney crisis rachets us towards totalitarianism.
Posted by: Randy, a CA resident at December 27, 2010 08:03 AM (D0PNd)
Posted by: George Orwell at December 27, 2010 08:03 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 27, 2010 08:03 AM (tJjm/)
and you can look out your window tonight to see a lighting market that converted from incans to LEDs without government "incentives". ( Xmas kigjts)
LED's are okay, but they're smaller than incandescents. I like holding regular light bulbs in my hands because they feel good. It's like fondling my testicles.
Posted by: Soona at December 27, 2010 08:04 AM (p00j9)
Is it wrong to use hobo fat as a base for soap? Or is it darkly humorous?
Posted by: Alex at December 27, 2010 08:04 AM (yY28H)
courtesy of a law signed by President Bush
Just another reason to make absolutely certain that no member of that odius, execrable clan ever again so much as sniffs the leather seats of public office.
Posted by: Lindsey Grahamnesty licking Rahm Emanuel's salty shaven balls at December 27, 2010 08:04 AM (pfMMA)
Posted by: Ian S. at December 27, 2010 11:58 AM
Wait till we put up the main page celebrating mandatory CFL's!
Posted by: Google, a Not Evil Corporation at December 27, 2010 08:07 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: Microsoft/Apple/Linux hippies at December 27, 2010 08:07 AM (AZGON)
"If it wasn't for family I would get the fuck out of this insane state."
Me too, Sparky, but I'm looking at a job in Salt Lake City. One hour from CA via air. No gangs. Peaceful Mormons. Outdoor fun.
Posted by: PJ at December 27, 2010 08:09 AM (QdxaI)
Posted by: Fritz wielding a pain stick at December 27, 2010 08:11 AM (GwPRU)
And I will be one of them.
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 27, 2010 08:12 AM (cIfeD)
Won't it be like those stupid gum commercials where the company goes out of business because no one is chewing their second piece of gum yet?
I like those commercials. Probably the gratitous violence and the freeze-frame capturing the worst of it. Has a Funniest Home Videos feel.
Posted by: DSkinner at December 27, 2010 08:13 AM (zpoBV)
117 I use candles for ambient light in the winter. Costs little (if you get the candles on sale) and ads to the heat in the room, thereby reducing the gas bill. Thus I don't need to have electric lights on in a room when just passing through, and can use my electric lights for reading, etc.
So you libs who laugh about candles can go suck an egg. I am burning them in the evenings until March or so, when it will finally warm up around here.
Plus they make the room smell good and the light is soft enough to cover dust bunnies.
Posted by: ¤§EZB§¤ at December 27, 2010 08:13 AM (Ty06w)
I'm sure the Iranians, Saudis, North Koreans, Libyans, and Venezuelans will make them.
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 27, 2010 08:15 AM (cIfeD)
You sat still while they invaded your school board.
Okay maybe not you personally.
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 27, 2010 08:16 AM (cIfeD)
125 Hobo fat burns longer and cleaner.
Is it wrong to use hobo fat as a base for soap? Or is it darkly humorous?
It's like lard, which has the same saponification properties as super chic shea--- which is to say HoboBars could be touted as a super skin conditioning luxury soap.
Posted by: ¤§EZB§¤ at December 27, 2010 08:17 AM (Ty06w)
Posted by: George Orwell at December 27, 2010 08:19 AM (AZGON)
Plus they make the room smell good and the light is soft enough to cover dust bunnies.
Not so good for us, though.
Posted by: Medieval and Renaissance paintings at December 27, 2010 08:20 AM (8lSIO)
Posted by: toby928™ at December 27, 2010 08:23 AM (S5YRY)
For added fun, label them 99.9W bulbs, just to poke em in the eye.
Posted by: Leonard Pinth-Garnell at December 27, 2010 08:23 AM (8grkz)
Heh. I forgot you are a soapmaking geek. Thanks for the note about lard. One of these days I'm going to try making a batch, so it's good to know about that.
Posted by: Alex at December 27, 2010 08:24 AM (yY28H)
At 18 1/2 cents per light bulb, I'll stick with several boxes of them till this stupid law gets repealed. or I die. I have enough to last either time frame.
Posted by: TexBob at December 27, 2010 08:25 AM (7cXE7)
Since this is not a maths blog I would bore with the equations but, you don't get swat for heating value out of a candle. 50 or 100 maybe.
I am not discounting the romanic mood and all the other goodness that candles can bring. Just don't freeze to death because you think candles can do the work.
Posted by: sTevo at December 27, 2010 08:27 AM (hEEpQ)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 27, 2010 08:27 AM (b6qrg)
Posted by: George Orwell at December 27, 2010 08:28 AM (AZGON)
--------
And don't forget that the car has to sit at the station for *hours* and *hours*; charging a battery isn't like filling a gas tank.
Posted by: Anachronda at December 27, 2010 08:35 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: Buffalobob at December 27, 2010 08:39 AM (GwH6h)
I have at least a 10 year supply of 40/60/100 watt incandescent light bulbs in my garage.
Posted by: Truck Monkey at December 27, 2010 08:43 AM (yQWNf)
Scotland won't have anything to do with Nuclear Power, at least on their own soil, but when their wind power doesn't work, they import it from France.
Morons, put me some knowledge, wouldya?
Why is it that libtards, who worship all things European, demand fucking high-speed rail links between bathhouses, prisons, VD clinics, and other Democrat strongholds, but resist nuclear power plants - which the Europeans have all over the place?
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 27, 2010 08:44 AM (xGh+C)
Forget about the border between the USA and Mexico.
Californians are so nutty that the federal goverment should put a huge fence around the entire state to isolate it, and they should stop all incoming and outgoing airplane flights and car traffic, and then declare the entire state of California as an insane asylum. I'm not joking. I'm serious.
Those loonies are a threat to this entire planet, not just to the rest of this country. Think about it: What do Californians contribute that the rest of the entire world couldn't do without? Try to name one item, just one. They're the most expendable loonies on this planet.
Posted by: Brian at December 27, 2010 08:45 AM (sYrWB)
Light Bulb Comparison - Adam Williams
The average U.S. household uses 45 light bulbs, as reported in numerous media outlets in the past year, including CBS News and Popular Mechanics Magazine.
The U.S. Department of Energy says changing even one of those bulbs can make a difference.
“If every American home replaced just one light bulb with an Energy Star-qualified bulb, we would save enough energy to light more than 3 million homes for a year, more than $600 million in annual energy costs, and prevent greenhouse gases equivalent to the emissions of more than 800,000 cars,” says the Department of Energy on its website, energystar.gov.
What a crock of shit. As I said, I did a calc for this a few years ago and we didn't save shit.
The average household uses one 100 watt bulb for only about an hour a day. That would save a whopping 60 watts a day. Wow, they will save $1.56 a year if in SC. One wonders how that computes to $600 mil a year?
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 08:45 AM (M9Ie6)
Think about it: What do Californians contribute that the rest of the entire world couldn't do without?
ALMONDS!
Posted by: California Almond Board at December 27, 2010 08:46 AM (yQWNf)
------
It's because Apple sued Microsoft for using a wastebasket.
How soon we forget.
Posted by: Anachronda at December 27, 2010 08:49 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: Grayson at December 27, 2010 08:52 AM (A7AFX)
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 12:45 PM
Remember, these are the same mathematical experts who warn that "we can't afford to pay for tax cuts". If a taxpayer pays less, he's "paid" by the government but if anyone has their handouts cut, the recipient is "paying"
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 08:52 AM (vdfwz)
Seriously, it takes a certain kind of talent to fuck things up this bad. It's oddly, and depressingly, impressive.
Posted by: Grayson at December 27, 2010 08:54 AM (A7AFX)
Let;s make it official, and declare California a national sewer and landfill.
Hell, even with help from nature, those lazy loonies can't any grow decent grapes or naval oranges anymore.
Posted by: Brian at December 27, 2010 08:58 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 27, 2010 12:27 PM (b6qrg)
See what good good people we are? We will STARVE to save Delta Smelt! And if we have to take the rest of you Gaia-destroying evil beings with us, so be it!
Posted by: Your Sainted CA Better at December 27, 2010 08:58 AM (VcPAo)
Posted by: brian at December 27, 2010 09:00 AM (y05cf)
GET OFF MY LAWN!
Posted by: brian at December 27, 2010 09:01 AM (y05cf)
Posted by: George Orwell at December 27, 2010 09:03 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 27, 2010 09:04 AM (9Cooa)
Eegads, just talking about California put a virus in my computer.
It's hexed and cursed. It's cursed, I tell you.
Posted by: Brian at December 27, 2010 09:06 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: Cincinnatus at December 27, 2010 09:12 AM (20rld)
Posted by: Grayson at December 27, 2010 12:52 PM (A7AFX)
Okay.
Posted by: Vladimir Putin at December 27, 2010 09:13 AM (p00j9)
Posted by: profligatewaste at December 27, 2010 09:15 AM (b3rrc)
Posted by: John S at December 27, 2010 09:25 AM (Z4sGX)
Have you noticed that California's conservatives are liberal loonies by the rest of the world's standards?
What's that say for the ones who actually claim to be liberals? Scary, huh?
Submitted by The Committee To Annex California To Tahiti
Posted by: Brian at December 27, 2010 09:28 AM (sYrWB)
So, next Christmass, there will be not lights? Those little bulbs are sure not florescent. Maybe we will go to LED's for lighting up the trees and houses, at what terrible cost. Plus, all the cities Christmass lights are not florescent. mexefornya, the first state to make Christmass illegal.
The atheists, BBFN, have finally won the war on Christmass out here in mexefornya.
Can not wait for 2012 to come, and it better be a dozy when it does. This would be the only way for GOD to sort it out.
Sacramento still have not turned on the pumps, to help out the water problem on the west side of the valley.
Posted by: Heltau at December 27, 2010 09:35 AM (RZDTZ)
Bill text and history for the curious:
H.R.6
Latest Title: Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR00006:@@@X
1/12/2007 Introduced in House
1/18/2007 Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 264 - 163
6/21/2007 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 65 - 27.
The actual bill is unsurprising ridded with TBDs, Secratary can exempt/requires and free goverment money.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 27, 2010 09:49 AM (xjHwH)
Posted by: TrickyDick at December 27, 2010 09:56 AM (bVka+)
Posted by: Jerry at December 27, 2010 10:10 AM (C5uEf)
I've been building gradually a stockpile of bulbs, but I was unaware of the early banning of 100 watters here in the Golden State, so I just laid in 200 more of them.
The way things are going, I consider them part of our retirement funding.
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at December 27, 2010 10:15 AM (fjoLg)
Posted by: sock puppeh at December 27, 2010 10:19 AM (VcPAo)
If every American home replaced just one light bulb with an Energy Star-qualified bulb, we would save enough energy to light more than 3 million homes for a year, more than $600 million in annual energy costs, and prevent greenhouse gases equivalent to the emissions of more than 800,000 cars,”
Is that sort'a like the old line that if one airplane can fly a ton of cargo 300 miles in one hour then two airplanes can fly a ton in 1/2 hour?
wonder how many CA girls got Easy Bake ovens for Christmas this year?
None. CA boys were given approx. 751,298. Mostly in S.F.
Posted by: Jess at December 27, 2010 10:50 AM (JxrwH)
Went to Wal-Mart today because it was the only place around here I could find a 100-watt light bulb for my daughters new Easy Bake oven she got for Christmas.
What's going to happen to that awesome toy for little girls when the only bulbs available are full of mercury and other poison shit? I'm not about to let her use one in hers!
Blankety-blank enviro-nazis!
Posted by: Teran Solo at December 27, 2010 10:57 AM (m/KLU)
What it caused was changing the highest smuggled item from Canada from marijuana to normal toilets. It also caused an untold number of abandoned houses in the country to be raided for old toilets.
As for saving water? Not so much since everyone now flushes twice.
Also, one of the Republicans in the House said he would introduce legislation next year to lift the ban. Even if it passed the more liberal Senate next year Obama will veto it.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 11:02 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at December 27, 2010 11:31 AM (LXffV)
They won't work anyway - they don't put out enough heat. You can probably still buy 100w incandescents online. Or go stock up before Jan. 1.
Posted by: sock puppeh at December 27, 2010 11:34 AM (VcPAo)
The rich libs in Cali will just have the bulbs brought in, you forget, rules are for the little people!
Posted by: Africanus at December 27, 2010 11:47 AM (ygqbC)
It's like people in Washington state and dishwasher detergent. You can only buy crappy eco-safe bullshit that doesn't work.
Solution? Drive to Idaho and buy real detergent!
How many CFL bulbs fit in a liberal's ass?
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at December 27, 2010 12:18 PM (P33XN)
Been here since March for a job. Mormons, while conservative, are of the squishiest flavor and thus more repulsive ideologically than straight on liberals. imho
Posted by: Modgi at December 27, 2010 12:18 PM (Vrb/j)
Posted by: Buffalobob at December 27, 2010 12:37 PM (GwH6h)
I have a special way to dispose of mine. I am saving them up until I have a bucket load.
I plan to chuck them at the State House in Sacramento. I would prefer to do this from the safety of an angry mob, so if any of you CA morons want to join me, let me know.
Posted by: navybrat at December 27, 2010 12:50 PM (1rmJS)
Actually that is a myth that has been debunked. When this first came out I went to the EPA site and they said to take standard precautions when cleaning up as you would any broken fluorescent light. They also said you could dispose of them in normal trash as the amount of Mercury was microscopic and of no real concern..
They have since changed that to say dispose of IAW applicable State law. Some States, like CA, have specific (and unnecessary) laws.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 01:08 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: ExExZonie at December 27, 2010 02:14 PM (FFFAl)
Posted by: AMOM at December 27, 2010 02:35 PM (FF5on)
Posted by: navybrat at December 27, 2010 03:09 PM (1rmJS)
Come to think of it, I should probably get some 100WTs for the garage. Yikes.
Posted by: not the droid you seek at December 27, 2010 04:47 PM (h35AH)
Posted by: OxyCon at December 27, 2010 08:44 PM (eJ7Yr)
Posted by: HT at December 27, 2010 10:53 PM (XBG8I)
"what kind of lighting they want.."
what kind of food I want, what kind of auto I want, what kind of toilet I want, what insurance I want, to smoke if I want, to buy a gun if I want, etc. etc. etc.
Posted by: Case at December 28, 2010 01:39 AM (0K+Kw)
When 100 watt incandescent bulbs are outlawed, only outlaws will be lit by 100 watt incandescent bulbs. Inevitably, folks will rent U-Hauls to smuggle incandescent bulbs in from Free America to California and sell them out of their trunks to their local neighborhoods. I'll bet many an eighteen-wheeler moving households or stereos will have a pallet of prohibited bulbs hidden up front. And really, if they bring bales of marijuana across the border from Mexico, why not incandescent bulbs?
Now, the thing is, I've converted to the fluorescent bulbs because I'm a lazy slug who is happy to pay more so I don't have to change a light bulb, especially those ones where I have to get on a ladder and unscrew a glass cover. Three bucks a bulb is nothing to me. And it's worked. I've only changed one light bulb in the last year, a bulb that's been burning for two or three years.
However, three bucks a bulb is an extravagance for a lot of people scraping by, people counting their pennies to put food on the table. When the greenie-weenie nuts force their whims on us by manipulating the law, they put the screws to the folks on the bottom, eking out a living. And all these nonsense laws accumulate, nickel and diming us, slowly making life more difficult for everyone.
I read some years ago that 38% of the cost of a home in California is due to laws which give sweetheart deals to unions and various manufacturers, ie a certain union gets a monopoly on a certain task and certain materials must be used that are made by a favored vendor. Bit by bit, the little laws make ordinary life unliveable. Creating that hostile environment for homeowners is part of what is chasing the middle class out of California.
Each foolish law on its own is hardly worth fighting but the process which piles up such impediments upon ordinary citizens must be defeated. Perhaps one way to defeat it is to let California die, suffocated by its own excess.
Posted by: Tantor at December 28, 2010 06:33 AM (blNMI)
Posted by: MoJoTee at December 28, 2010 12:08 PM (uGBn8)
Great article. Resources such as the one you mentioned here will be extremely helpful to myself! Thanks once again for the push!
Posted by: burberry at December 30, 2010 12:26 AM (ZrgUq)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2369 seconds, 312 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: steevy at December 27, 2010 07:08 AM (gNxja)