October 09, 2010
— Ace This isn't just opinion. This is data collected from focus groups.
He finds the Blame Bush message actually costs the Democrats 2% at the polls.
The weakest messages assert we should “go forward, not back.” Voters are not moved by Democratic messages that say ‘go forward, not back,’ mention President Bush, compare then and now, or even that hint the economy is “showing signs of progress.” No matter how dramatically these messages set out the record of Republican obstructionism, their work for the wealthiest and Goldman Sachs, the millions of jobs lost and Democrats’ support for jobs, small business and new industries – these messages falter before the Republican attack.The messages get lower scores and lose voters. After hearing this battle of Republican and Democratic messages, 8 percent shift their vote to support the Republican, while only 5 percent move to the Democrats. We lose ground. These messages are helping the Republicans.
But, as we can see in the rank order summary of the different messages tested, this is the weakest way to go into the election.
This framework provides the least help to Democrats running in this election, indeed, leaves the Democratic congressional candidate a net 2 points weaker, which we can hardly afford. This is the only framework tested in this project that leaves the candidates in a weakened position.
When listening to people react to this message in focus groups or watching them react to video clips of this message, they respond with a common sense that we should heed. People are intensely dissatisfied with the economy and are looking for solutions – anything less sounds like excuses or some political blame game. Though voters agree the economy was an “inherited” problem, they do not like to hear politicians blaming Bush or looking backwards.
For some, going back to four years ago does not look so uninviting right now: “I was doing a heckavah lot better under Bush.”
“Who wouldn’t want to go back to 6 or 8 years ago? There was less unemployment back then. I’d rather go back. I’d go back to 8 years ago. I would rather go backwards than forwards right now.” White non-college female.
Because a “go forward” framework implies that Democrats and Congress have made progress those voters do not feel, the message re-enforces the Republican framework for the election – a referendum on the Democrats’ performance on the economy. In the experiment described above (where voters read the two Republican messages and the two Democratic ‘go forward, not back’ messages), votes shifted to the Republicans not only on which party can best handle the economy but also on the congressional vote. The 5 percent who shifted to the Democrats was exceeded by the 7 percent of voters who moved to the Republicans – a net negative 2-point worsening of the race.
But what else do they have?
Thanks to Purple Avenger.
Posted by: Ace at
04:01 PM
| Comments (172)
Post contains 500 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 09, 2010 08:03 PM (6cqZX)
Yup. The GOP needs to formulate an ad with Reagan asking that question in the voiceover.
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 04:06 PM (fgCQL)
But what else do they have?
Nothing.
That's why we haven't seen any sort of meaningful pushback from the Dems.
They're screwed and they know it.
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2010 04:06 PM (meTPx)
I've been arguing the Republicans should be making the reciprocal message.
When the Republicans were running things unemployment was 4.5% and the deficit $250B. Four years after Obama and his allies took Congress we now have 20% unemployment and a $2T deficit. Those numbers are hard to argue with.
Posted by: 18-1 at October 09, 2010 04:06 PM (bgcml)
We lose ground. These messages are helping the Republicans.
you think, Mary Matalin's Frankenstein?
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 09, 2010 04:06 PM (6cqZX)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:07 PM (tJjm/)
Gingrich hit a home run this week when he called the Democrats the party of the Food Stamps and the Republicans the party of the paycheck.
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 09, 2010 04:08 PM (hBqOU)
I suggest immediate emergency Seppuku by all of the Democrats. Show some real contrition for your screw up, and we might let the other Dems stay in the country.
Posted by: Kristopher at October 09, 2010 04:08 PM (aAof6)
Aw, crap. I just finished memorizing that whole car in the ditch, Republicans with Slurpees story. Does this mean I have to learn something else that I can repeat without using the Tele-Prom-Ter?
Man, this Presidentin' stuff is hard.
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 04:08 PM (fgCQL)
It may not have been George Bushs' fault, but you must admit that Dick Cheney and Halliburton played a big role in reaching the 4.8% unemployment, which is unacceptable in anyone's playbook.
Posted by: Fish at October 09, 2010 04:09 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 09, 2010 08:08 PM (hBqOU)
It was astounding that Pelosi stepped right into Gingrich's trap by trying to prove that giving people food stamps was better economic policy than letting businesses create jobs.
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 04:10 PM (fgCQL)
But what else do they have?
John Boehner hangs with lobbyists, tans, and smokes unfiltered cigs.
And Sarah Palin is a stupid snowbilly.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 09, 2010 04:10 PM (AZWim)
It may not have been George Bushs' fault, but you must admit that Dick Cheney and Halliburton played a big role in reaching the 4.8% unemployment, which is unacceptable in anyone's playbook.
Posted by: Fish at October 09, 2010 08:09 PM (v1gw3)
Jobless recovery, the MSM always said!
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:10 PM (tJjm/)
It was astounding that Pelosi stepped right into Gingrich's trap by trying to prove that giving people food stamps was better economic policy than letting businesses create jobs.
And she said the same thing about unemployment! This woman is a fucking dunce.
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 09, 2010 04:11 PM (6cqZX)
Fuck off you redneck skeletor. You are a disgrace to the South, and a liar to boot.
Posted by: Britt at October 09, 2010 04:12 PM (cGAax)
We were told this administration has been creating jobs since day one, but because of the Bush policies from the past, the outflow far exceeds the gains because of those disastrous Bush policies.
Posted by: Fish at October 09, 2010 04:13 PM (v1gw3)
It was astounding that Pelosi stepped right into Gingrich's trap by trying to prove that giving people food stamps was better economic policy than letting businesses create jobs.
C'mon! Pelosi's stupid.
Posted by: Soona at October 09, 2010 04:14 PM (f9Pxh)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:14 PM (tJjm/)
Never? Will Bush always be responsible for Obama's failures?
Posted by: Kristopher at October 09, 2010 04:14 PM (aAof6)
"For every dollar in food stamps, it creates $1.72 in spending."
-Nancy Pelosi
Anyone have any ideas about this pronouncement?
Posted by: Fish at October 09, 2010 04:14 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: the chicken at October 09, 2010 04:15 PM (DHNp4)
Posted by: DrewM. at October 09, 2010 08:12 PM (HicGG)
True. Notice the clumsy way Unfrozen Caveman Congressman down in Florida is trying to win.
Daniel Webster is a sexist!
The Dim playbook is as simplistic as the Cornhusker playbook from 30 years ago.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 09, 2010 04:15 PM (AZWim)
With 3 weeks left... I doubt there is enough time for Dems to recover.
Posted by: Timbo at October 09, 2010 08:16 PM (ph9vn)
Thanks for the boner!
Posted by: Fish at October 09, 2010 04:16 PM (v1gw3)
"For every dollar in food stamps, it creates $1.72 in spending."
-Nancy Pelosi
Anyone have any ideas about this pronouncement?
Posted by: Fish at October 09, 2010 08:14 PM (v1gw3)
Crystal Meth?
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:16 PM (tJjm/)
And she's just after Biden in line for the Presidency. Think about that!
To her credit, she is slightly smarter than Sheriff Joe.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 09, 2010 04:16 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 09, 2010 04:17 PM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:17 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 09, 2010 04:17 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: SlaveDog at October 09, 2010 04:18 PM (foEpt)
I thought they had that Hopey/Changey thing that the O'gasm promised them?
Guess that hasn't worked out for them, hasn't it?
9%+ funemployment..."Ethical" Congress...bailouts of the banking and auto industries...union and community activist "friends"..."stimulus"...
And the assclowns in power wonder why the American people are "angry" at them???
Time to shift their "paradigm" on November 2nd...for good
Posted by: Infidel Mataween at October 09, 2010 04:18 PM (6jkGA)
Democrats are full of shit. 2006 forward with a kick-up in 2008 with the election of Obama and the take over of all levels of power by the corruptocrats.
The democrats have destroyed our economy with each and every legislative move they have made.
Carville - You white non-college male.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 09, 2010 04:18 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: AmericanDawg at October 09, 2010 04:19 PM (QEbMi)
Lose, my fellow Republicans, LOSE!
Posted by: Joe Scarborough at October 09, 2010 04:19 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Don at October 09, 2010 04:19 PM (tTj19)
Because what poor welfare fuck ever hired someone?
Posted by: kansas at October 09, 2010 04:19 PM (J5UD+)
Posted by: Soona at October 09, 2010 04:20 PM (f9Pxh)
I've seen now the game is played, to quote Patton, I've read the Democrats' God damned book. This economic mess belongs to them 100%. As does the deficit. And the wreck of our foreign policy.
Run against the last four years Republicans to clear terms, and you will win.
Posted by: 18-1 at October 09, 2010 04:20 PM (bgcml)
"In November 2006, unemployment was 6 percent, the deficit was $250 billion, and the Democrats took a majority in both houses of Congress.
"In January 2007, Nancy Pelosi became Speaker of the House."
Then clips of Pelosi giving her first speech as Speaker of the House:
"We will be fiscally responsible."
[Title: "The deficit today is $1.5 trillion - five times as much as 2006."]
"We will have the most ethical Congress in history."
[Title: "___ Democrat Members of Congress indicted, convicted or under formal ethics charges."]
"We will restore the American economy and create jobs for Americans."
[Title: "Unemployment has been at or over 9.5 percent since May 2009."]
Then a new title:
"It's time to ask yourself the question Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats won't ask:"
Reagan voice-over matching the title card:
"Are you better off today than you were four years ago?"
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 04:20 PM (fgCQL)
The problem the Democrats truly face is destruction of capital. Many (most?) of Obama's economic policies involve destruction of capital, which are symptomatic of ......socialism?
The buyout/cramdown of Chrysler and GM. Destruction of the capital of the senior bond holders.
Mis-use of the TARP funds.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac continue to operate at a loss. They have combined to destroy the private bank home-finance business. Is there any wonder that banks are failing, as the government subsidizes Fannie and Freddie (allowing them to keep losing money-destroying capital) while simultaneously destroying private banks. It's a two-fer!
Cash for clunkers. Destroying used cars turned in, which actually had some market value.
Cap and Trade. Not law yet, but passed the House. The EPA may move to control "greenhouse gases" on its own and destroy more market value.
And of course, the incipient greatest entitlement/capital destruction of all, Health Care Reform.
Obama and the associated Democrat Party intentionally miss every kind of market signal that their economics policies are WRONG.
And that is the message that many Americans are getting, even if they do not partake of deep-thinking economic analysis. Carville can't wave a magic wand and change the message that the Obama Administration has been sending out loud and clear since the beginning.
It's always easy to "Bash Bush", but the deficit spending he tolerated or allowed was mostly linked to the Iraq war and buying a fraction of votes from Democrats to allow it to continue. The price of....victory?
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch says... at October 09, 2010 04:21 PM (sJTmU)
Because what poor welfare fuck ever hired someone?
Posted by: kansas at October 09, 2010 08:19 PM (J5UD+)
Well, they do help pay some salaries.
Posted by: Some Drug Dealer at October 09, 2010 04:21 PM (bgcml)
The next breaking news from the White House will be that Barack is no longer servicing Michelle, and she nightly rides the Sybian. It's also transported on AF1, the same as Hillary's port-a-john!
Posted by: Fish at October 09, 2010 04:21 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Soona at October 09, 2010 08:20 PM (f9Pxh)
I forgot to add: in NY.
Posted by: Soona at October 09, 2010 04:22 PM (f9Pxh)
C'mon! Pelosi's stupid.
Posted by: Soona at October 09, 2010 08:14 PM (f9Pxh)
Hell no she's not. That bitch is evil. She only sounds that way because that's how her braindead constituency is used to hearing her.
You and I and most everyone else here has a brain that works.
They don't.
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2010 04:22 PM (meTPx)
Posted by: nine coconuts at October 09, 2010 04:23 PM (DHNp4)
The next breaking news from the White House will be that Barack is no longer servicing Michelle, and she nightly rides the Sybian. It's also transported on AF1, the same as Hillary's port-a-john!
If Barry borrows it, is it officially Sybian One?
Posted by: Joe Scarborough at October 09, 2010 04:23 PM (tJjm/)
Well, they do help pay some salaries.
Posted by: Some Drug Dealer at October 09, 2010 08:21 PM (bgcml)
Preach.
Posted by: Old English 800 at October 09, 2010 04:23 PM (AZWim)
------
What does he mean by "we"?
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 09, 2010 04:23 PM (bAySe)
okay, you'll like this vid. It shows how ABC News's Charlie Gibson is a turd.
Gibson (and the Democrats) slammed Reagan's economic policies and then you see how, almost 30 years later, praises Obama's.
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 09, 2010 04:23 PM (6cqZX)
Posted by: AmericanDawg at October 09, 2010 08:19 PM (QEbMi)
The ad syndication system fills in any ad spots Ace doesn't sell. Because it is smart, it analyzes page content to match ads to the blog post subject matter. Any post that talks about the Democrats, Republicans and elections is going to snag ads for political campaigns, and the ad syndication system doesn't care which side of the issue the blog post takes.
I think.
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 04:24 PM (fgCQL)
If Barry borrows it, is it officially Sybian One?
Posted by: Joe Scarborough at October 09, 2010 08:23 PM (tJjm/)
Joe Biden will demand equal treatment with Sybian Two!
Posted by: Fish at October 09, 2010 04:25 PM (v1gw3)
ok this -
2006 forward with a kick-up in 2008 with the election of Obama and the take over of all levels of power by the corruptocrats.
...is not a sentence. oy.
The democrats own every seat of power and they have driven us off an unsustainable social-welfare cliff.
The car is in (D).
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 09, 2010 04:25 PM (0fzsA)
"Reid actually voted to use taxpayer dollars to pay for Viagra for convicted child molesters and sex offenders." http://tiny.cc/6yp9c
So? And your point is what, exactly?
"Aye, and do he fantail little for go down? "
Posted by: Call Me Ishmael at October 09, 2010 04:25 PM (UL/HQ)
Posted by: lorien1973 at October 09, 2010 04:27 PM (ZXnUe)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gE7pgUvirgM
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:27 PM (tJjm/)
okay, you'll like this vid. It shows how ABC News's Charlie Gibson is a turd.
Gibson (and the Democrats) slammed Reagan's economic policies and then you see how, almost 30 years later, praises Obama's.
Charlie Gibson? Never heard of him.
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at October 09, 2010 04:27 PM (f9Pxh)
Posted by: AmericanDawg at October 09, 2010 08:19 PM (QEbMi)
It depends on where you live. Almost everything I see on here is for Pat Toomey here in PA. I'm voting for him but I'm almost sick of seeing the ads for him. In fact it seems almost every site I visit I see ads for Pat Toomey. I suppose that's a good thing.
Posted by: PoconoJoe at October 09, 2010 04:27 PM (/Oekv)
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 09, 2010 08:23 PM (bAySe)
He's James Carville. By "we," he means the Democrats.
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 04:28 PM (fgCQL)
OK... you're Ishmael.
Now make me a ham sandwich and call me a cab.
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:28 PM (tJjm/)
I forgot to add: in NY.
Posted by: Soona at October 09, 2010 08:22 PM (f9Pxh)
While I want to win everywhere, its not going to happen. I expect we'll get NY23 back, but most of NY is probably a loss.
Posted by: 18-1 at October 09, 2010 04:29 PM (bgcml)
OE 800 yes that's my brand!
Drink it in a bottle, 40, quart or can!
Drink it like a mad man yes I do!
Forget the police and the 502!
Posted by: NWA at October 09, 2010 04:29 PM (meTPx)
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 09, 2010 04:32 PM (tTfVO)
Posted by: cthulhu at October 09, 2010 04:34 PM (/0IOT)
Posted by: Cowboy at October 09, 2010 04:34 PM (XYcTY)
OE 800 yes that's my brand!
Drink it in a bottle, 40, quart or can!
Drink it like a mad man yes I do!
Forget the police and the 502!
Posted by: NWA at October 09, 2010 08:29 PM (meTPx)
The blog for pot legalization is over there. Next time don't fall asleep at the stoplight.
Posted by: Soona at October 09, 2010 04:34 PM (f9Pxh)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2010 04:35 PM (twE5F)
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 09, 2010 04:35 PM (tTfVO)
Posted by: PoconoJoe at October 09, 2010 08:27 PM (/Oekv)
That reminds me of a tv ad I've seen 50 times on Fox News down here in SC for a fake moderate Dim running for AG. Never tells us his party of course, but hammers home how tough on crime he is.
I really dislike fugazi so called moderate Dims. I respect John Lewis or Jim McDermitt more. At least they are relatively honest.
While I'm at it, Heath Shuler can blow me.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 09, 2010 04:35 PM (AZWim)
Posted by: The Chicken at October 09, 2010 04:35 PM (AQxTm)
But I wonder, pointlessly, what's the audible difference between "heck of a" and "heckavah?" I don't think even William Buckley would pronounce those two things differently (and my WFB impression is awesome). What does this D-tard misspelling transcribe? Why does "heckavah" exist?
...Yeah, I know. Jus' say'n'.
Posted by: oblig. at October 09, 2010 04:35 PM (x7Ao8)
Republicans: They leave the seat up
Heh. After the women in the office kept complaining I left the seat up, I just started pissing all over the seat.
It's the little victories in life that make the difference!
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:37 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 08:28 PM (tJjm/)
Okay, you're a ham sandwich and your name is Taxi.
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 04:37 PM (fgCQL)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at October 09, 2010 04:38 PM (mXHlz)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 09, 2010 04:38 PM (wd0Iq)
I get mostly Meg Whitman ads on every site I visit. But I love clicking on the Jerry Brown ads and ads from that bitch running against Bachmann the most. I love the idea that those losers' ads may net Ace some bucks.
Posted by: Miss Fluffy McNutter at October 09, 2010 04:39 PM (xMSXs)
Posted by: Soona at October 09, 2010 04:40 PM (f9Pxh)
Change the dipping "sauce" from pudding to Fabreeze and Diet Mt. Dew. That mixture will be so cold that your "decadence rise" will abate immediately.
/You'll find the desired effect occurred...after you regain consciousness.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 09, 2010 04:41 PM (c0A3e)
Isn't tonight date night? Why are you good looking chicks sitting around in pajamas stroking a keyboard when you could be knocking back a few MadDog 20/20's with a discrete Moron?
Posted by: Fish at October 09, 2010 04:43 PM (v1gw3)
One of the few funny lines Tina Fey had on the SNL Weekend Update was "and if your erection lasts longer than four hours, brag about it to your friends".
Posted by: booger at October 09, 2010 04:43 PM (awinc)
Yeah, for every dollar given out in food stamps, another $0.72 gets wasted on bureaucrats in the Dept of Agriculture.
Posted by: jimmyk at October 09, 2010 04:43 PM (m1bAT)
...Yeah, I know. Jus' say'n'.
Posted by: oblig. at October 09, 2010 08:35 PM (x7Ao
It's supposed to be "heckuva," as in "Heckuva job, Brownie."
Out here in the East Bay of the San Francisco Bay Area, "helluva" has become "hella." As in, "I Hella ♥ The 510."
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 04:43 PM (fgCQL)
I can get you a referral to the head nurse at our emergency room, if you'd like.
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:44 PM (tJjm/)
Why does "heckavah" exist?
It's clearly Jew-centric.
I have nothing to back that up, it just sounds Jewish to me and therefore Zionist.
If it were "heckuvuh" I could chalk that up to Ohio hillbilly simpletons.
The additions of the "a" and "ah" to "heckavah" is on obvious connection to "Jahovah" which is clearly anti-Islamic and hateful.
Posted by: ErikW, Professor Emeritus of Anti-Jewism and Fellow at the Mid Ohio College of Hate and Virulence at October 09, 2010 04:45 PM (meTPx)
What do I do if my erection lasts longer than 4 hours on election night??
Call me big boy, and I'll get it down safely.
Posted by: Nurse Ratched at October 09, 2010 04:46 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Nurse Ratched at October 09, 2010 08:46 PM (v1gw3)
OK... you're a Big Boy.
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:48 PM (tJjm/)
The additions of the "a" and "ah" to "heckavah" is on obvious connection to "Jahovah" which is clearly anti-Islamic and hateful.
Posted by: ErikW, Professor Emeritus of Anti-Jewism and Fellow at the
Mid Ohio College of Hate and Virulence at October 09, 2010 08:45 PM
(meTPx)
Another rousing chorus of "Heckavah Nagila," anyone?
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 04:48 PM (fgCQL)
Posted by: Kristopher at October 09, 2010 04:48 PM (aAof6)
Don't forget yours on election night!*
*Goes well with pudding.
Posted by: Rocks at October 09, 2010 04:49 PM (AoVGn)
Posted by: Fish at October 09, 2010 08:43 PM (v1gw3)
Damn dude, you gotta quick spoiling the girls. Don't be a chump.
A bottle of Thunderbird is as far as I'll go. Maybe a 6er of Natty Light.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 09, 2010 04:49 PM (AZWim)
Stay up all night, sounds like...
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:49 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 09, 2010 04:49 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Put It In Ⓓ at October 09, 2010 04:50 PM (FcR7P)
Starting marketing whatever brand of pudding you were using as the next viagra?
Posted by: 18-1 at October 09, 2010 04:50 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 09, 2010 08:49 PM (c0A3e)
You bastard.
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:50 PM (tJjm/)
Has anyone read the article at HA about the repubs getting tazed in the polls by the dems? - Posted by: Soona at October 09, 2010 08:20 PM (f9Pxh)
Since that particular poll doesn't mention the breakdown of voters (how many R/D/I's there were) or how they weighted the numbers, I wouldn't set much store in that outfit's poll (SurveyUSA, I believe).
Between now and November 2nd, there will be lots of misleading poll numbers put out there to try and gin up support with the Democrat voters. Given the enthusiasm on the Republican side, I'd be willing to bet that many seats that are currently D will switch to R.
If these polling outfits are shown to be too "off", they may find themselves with no business in the next election cycle. They aren't doing themselves any favors by skewing the numbers for the result that they want to see.
Granted, this election cycle is unlike anything anyone has seen in their lifetime, so these outfits may be adjusting because they can't believe that the numbers they are seeing are correct.
Of course, they could also be using the "East Anglia" methodology of manipulating the data......
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at October 09, 2010 04:50 PM (AAN7N)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2010 08:35 PM (twE5F)
Dip it in a Slurpee! Refreshing!
Posted by: Rocks at October 09, 2010 04:51 PM (AoVGn)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 08:44 PM (tJjm/)
I'm not sure head is the right prescription for the condition. He might be better off with a dick nurse.
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 04:51 PM (fgCQL)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 09, 2010 04:51 PM (U5btG)
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 09, 2010 04:51 PM (tTfVO)
Yeah I tried that, but then Barry whined about it every day for the next week.
Posted by: Michelle Obama at October 09, 2010 04:51 PM (bgcml)
Out here in the East Bay of the San Francisco Bay Area, "helluva" has become "hella." As in, "I Hella ¢¾ The 510."
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 08:43 PM (fgCQL)
Isn't rapper Too Short from the bay area? Perhaps he started the trend. He's old school.
Sorry, Delta, my sarcasm meter is in the shop.
Posted by: Kristopher at October 09, 2010 08:48 PM (aAof6)
No worries. I was just scared you were accusing me of being an Andi Sullivan lover or something.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 09, 2010 04:51 PM (AZWim)
I'm pretty sure the Geneva Convention specifically defines that as a form of torture.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at October 09, 2010 04:53 PM (mXHlz)
While I'm at it, Heath Shuler can blow me.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 09, 2010 08:35 PM (AZWim)
Dude, I've spent the last two years felating Nancy Pelosi, I'm tired.
Posted by: Heath Schuler at October 09, 2010 04:53 PM (bgcml)
Head nurse, you know, like giving... oh, never mind!
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:54 PM (tJjm/)
Good point.
With that said, we should imprison terrorists in rooms completely plastered with Helen Thomas pictures to make them talk.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 09, 2010 04:56 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 08:54 PM (tJjm/)
Yes, I know. And I don't think head is the best treatment for priapism. It seems that it might exacerbate the condition. And too much exacerbating might be how the problem got started.
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 04:56 PM (fgCQL)
Posted by: Average Joe at October 09, 2010 04:56 PM (liBQN)
Yeah I tried that, but then Barry whined about it every day for the next week.
Having shared a unisex bathroom in the workplace for a while, I have to say it's women that tend to piss all over the seat. Something I could never quite figure out the physics off, until one explained that some women don't like to actually make contact with the seat.
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 04:57 PM (tJjm/)
Now ya'll tell me something, did I just watch an hour of Huck 1. Ambush Ann Coulter 2. Embrace Arianna Huffington and EuroSocialism and 3. Allow Ben Stein to say we should punish the 'rich' after the recession ends but not now?
Did he not just prove everything Coulter was saying to be, in fact, true?
Posted by: Artruen at October 09, 2010 04:57 PM (L+dBi)
Posted by: Herr Blücher at October 09, 2010 04:58 PM (XGHwt)
Sorry ot, but Hotair has a story on Susan Collins bitching about the Republicans.
I bet she flips to the dems if not before , right after the election. I say good riddance to bad rubbish, bitch!
Posted by: lou at October 09, 2010 05:00 PM (AwCWP)
Posted by: Trader at October 09, 2010 05:01 PM (xgMGY)
Posted by: Average Joe at October 09, 2010 08:56 PM (liBQN)
I can't get enough of Average Joe. Never fails to crack me up. A few of his posts are pretty damn creative. Who's with me?
Crazed Wicket pics/ Average Joe 2012
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 09, 2010 05:01 PM (AZWim)
Posted by: Average Joe at October 09, 2010 08:56 PM (liBQN)
Just gonna stay home and beat about the bush, eh?
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 05:04 PM (tJjm/)
The one thing the Repubs are NOT doing, is going back to when the Dems took over Congress.
The year before that is the one they should be pointing to... because it is CONGRESS that spends money.
Then point out that after 2 years of Dem control of Congress... ie those who make the laws and spend the money... the economy crashed... and with the Dems in charge has not gotten any better.
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 09, 2010 05:05 PM (AdK6a)
Posted by: Average Joe at October 09, 2010 08:56 PM (liBQN)
What makes this even funnier is how America lionizes whores - the Kardashians, Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan.
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 05:05 PM (fgCQL)
Even age could influence how a person uses the newfound power of, say, X-Ray vision.
"A 20-year-old may go to the locker rooms and look through the walls," Rosenberg said. "I don't know that a 50-year-old would." [according to Robin Rosenberg, a clinical psychologist.]
Bullshit you don't know. Of course they would! This guy needs to go get his money back for his phony degree.
Posted by: AoSHQ's Truman North at October 09, 2010 05:08 PM (HLGCA)
O/T:
Delaware Alcohol & Tobacco Enforcement director resigns
Early yesterday morning the director of the Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Enforcement was arrested for driving under the influence on Route 1 near Lewes. Today, 45 year old Siobhan Sullivan submitted a letter of resignation – effective immediately on its acceptance by the Secretary of Safety and Homeland Security.
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 09, 2010 05:08 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: AoSHQ's Truman North at October 09, 2010 09:09 PM (HLGCA)
Well, if you're going to keep talking like that, it's no wonder erections around here are lasting more than four hours.
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 05:10 PM (fgCQL)
Posted by: Average Joe at October 09, 2010 08:56 PM (liBQN)
That made no sense.
Thanks for the random talking points, tard.
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2010 05:11 PM (meTPx)
Thanks for the random talking points, tard.
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2010 09:11 PM (meTPx)
Do you not know about Average Joe's comedy schtick, or are you sort of playing along?
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 05:13 PM (fgCQL)
Posted by: AoSHQ's Truman North at October 09, 2010 05:15 PM (HLGCA)
Posted by: AoSHQ's Truman North at October 09, 2010 05:16 PM (HLGCA)
Average Joe is a sock.
Posted by: eman at October 09, 2010 09:13 PM (zjx6L)
Agh!
Who suckered me?
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2010 05:16 PM (meTPx)
Posted by: Average Joe at October 09, 2010 05:16 PM (liBQN)
I can't get enough of Average Joe. Never fails to crack me up. A few of his posts are pretty damn creative. Who's with me?
Crazed Wicket pics/ Average Joe 2012
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 09, 2010 09:01 PM (AZWim) .....
yes your right......... but hes not Machines For Sale guy........ he really cracks me up and i look forward to seeing him......
Posted by: Racefan at October 09, 2010 05:16 PM (4Ep9X)
Posted by: Average Joe at October 09, 2010 09:16 PM (liBQN)
While I've never been married, I would think GA would remind men of their ex wives.
Damn, there I go taking AJ at face value. Heh.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 09, 2010 05:18 PM (AZWim)
Do you not know about Average Joe's comedy schtick, or are you sort of playing along?
Posted by: stuiec at October 09, 2010 09:13 PM (fgCQL)
No I didn't know, I'm about to be owned huh?
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2010 05:19 PM (meTPx)
yes your right......... but hes not Machines For Sale guy........ he really cracks me up and i look forward to seeing him......
Posted by: Racefan at October 09, 2010 09:16 PM (4Ep9X)
Hell, I smile when "En Fuego" guy pops up, or "in before the troll". I'm a simple Moron with simple needs.
Wicket blows the competition away though. My favorite is still shop class John Boehner.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 09, 2010 05:23 PM (AZWim)
Really, they had to be told that blaming bush wasn't going to work after they forced healthcare etc etc down our throats? I argue with hubby that these guys are the tools of the communists and are ideological socialists with a plan. He says they are noobs. When they don't grasp that the bush thing won't work forever, his argument seems more realistic.
I'm dying for a slurpee.
Posted by: dagny at October 09, 2010 05:24 PM (l4teH)
Posted by: Average Joe at October 09, 2010 05:29 PM (liBQN)
Any guesses what she has to do to get "ready" for Carville?
Two buckets of industrial whore-grade lube?
Banned lezzie pron?
Novocaine??
I'm just stumped.
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 09, 2010 05:36 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: AmericanDawg at October 09, 2010 08:19 PM (QEbMi)
That means the ad-tracker knows from your cookies that you visit very naughty websites... DailyKos, Huffington Post, NYT, etc, etc
Posted by: phreshone at October 09, 2010 05:39 PM (1AnxB)
Posted by: Average Joe at October 09, 2010 09:29 PM (liBQN)
Very good! As a Liberty minded Social Conservative with Fiscally Minded Fiscal Policies, I welcome your ideas and the challenges that your group will be faced with as our country moves toward the next century.
As a Fiscal Conservative, I welcome the challenges which are embraced by such luminaries as The T. Hendren and Sons Asphalt and Sewage Company, The Arthur T. McCarther Endowment for the Arts and the T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII Center for Middle East Progress.
As such, I would never have learned what beeswax is to a sealed toilet base.
And for that, I thank them.
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2010 05:48 PM (meTPx)
Posted by: Peaches at October 09, 2010 05:50 PM (zxpIo)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 09, 2010 05:55 PM (61b7k)
Posted by: Ronster at October 09, 2010 06:01 PM (9q4PA)
What else do they have?
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 09, 2010 09:55 PM (61b7k)
Nothing! They have nothing!
They shot their wad months ago. All the bigotry cards are used up, all the accusations of killing the planet are defunct.
Progressives have committted hari kari because they tried too hard.
Next stop, Midterm Elections! Make the bastards pay!
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2010 06:05 PM (meTPx)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at October 09, 2010 06:38 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Infidel Mataween at October 09, 2010 08:03 PM (uZYdF)
Early this year it really was a viable delaying strategy while they hoped for the hopelessly derailed unicorn train to arrive.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at October 09, 2010 08:07 PM (5GDtG)
-Nancy Pelosi
Anyone have any ideas about this pronouncement?
Yup.
While that dollar in food stamps may ultimately result in $1.72 in spending (the multiplier effect, as in you spend in the store, they pay their employees who spend elsewhere, etc.), I doubt they're counting the fact that that dollar is taken from someone else.
So next time you are sitting anywhere near a Dembot and they repeat this one, come back with, "So, since it costs the taxpayers a dollar to provide one dollar of food stamps, what you're saying is that we're paying a dollar and getting effectively 72 cents worth of spending".
Wear something washable. I don't know what constitutes liberal brain matter, but it is incompatible with dry-clean only clothes.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at October 09, 2010 08:15 PM (JI6rU)
Do not underestimate the power of the comma.
Posted by: Pelayo at October 10, 2010 05:00 AM (QLmzi)
Posted by: Captain Hate at October 10, 2010 05:22 AM (hRNYI)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 10, 2010 07:23 AM (61b7k)
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon?
Seems like I been down this way before.
Is there any truth in that, senor?
Posted by: Jose the Illegal at October 10, 2010 02:22 PM (tE8FB)
Posted by: John Kevin at June 13, 2011 09:22 PM (mnahM)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3109 seconds, 300 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








It makes people think...
"Am I better off now than I was two/four years ago?"
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 09, 2010 04:03 PM (6cqZX)