April 29, 2010
— Ace That's Jay Cost's analysis. He thinks Crist is pretty much doomed.
It's a read the whole thing sort of thing, but I'll see if I can't grab a little here and there:
One, Independents don't win elections to the US Senate in three-way contests. Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman are in office because one party or the other implicitly backed them. That isn't going to happen here. By my count, the last candidate to win election to the Senate as an Independent (other than Sanders and Lieberman) was Harry Byrd of Virginia. He won in 1976 because the Republicans did not run a candidate. This is not coincidental.Voters vote their partisanship, and most voters are partisan. The 2008 exit poll found that the Florida electorate was 37% Democrat, 34% Republican, and 29% Independent. I'd note that the exit polls don't ask Independents how they lean. Gallup asks that question, and that's why they currently find that only 12% of Americans are "pure" Independents.
Voters are also strategic. Remember the New Jersey governor's race? Independent Christopher Daggett was polling at 10%, but only got 5.8% on Election Day. there's a reason for that. American elections are winner take all, which makes it very difficult for third parties to thrive. Once voters catch wind that a vote for a third party candidate is a waste, they'll bail on that candidate.
...
Second, it would be hard to come up with a strategy that goes against the zeitgeist as much as Crist's decision to run as an Independent. Congressional job approval is getting so low that only members of Congress and their staff approve of the job the legislature is doing. And why? Ask people you know in life and they'll complain about politicians who are only out for themselves, who aren't looking out for the interests of the people. And now here comes good old Charlie Crist, who just a few weeks ago swore off an Independent run. This is a dishonest and nakedly self-interested move, and voters are fed up with this kind of behavior. The only compelling motivation that Charlie Crist has to run as an Independent is so that Charlie Crist can stay in elective office. That is not good enough in a year like 2010....
His political career will be over in just a few short months. What a fool.
Jim Geraghty writes a column with a similar theme -- Crist is an idiot -- but mostly on the basis of policy and poor political choices.
And here's Crist promising to do what he previously perceived to be in his own best interests a month ago. This should play well. Especially given that Crist has no good answer as to why he's now repudiating his beloved "Party of Abraham Lincoln." And, come on, there's not a voter in the state who believes this to be a decision of principle.
Check out Crist's website, too:
“Instead of being open and honest with voters and owning up to the thousands of dollars that remain unaccounted for from his political committees and releasing his tax returns, the Rubio campaign would prefer to spread baseless rumors.“To put these rumors to rest once and for all, as we have said countless times before, Governor Crist is running for the United States Senate as a Republican. He will not run as an Independent or as a No Party Affiliation.
“The Governor is proud of his conservative credentials and stands firmly behind the principles of limited government and more personal freedom, the bedrock values of the Republican Party. He is proud to be a member of the Party of Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan.
“This should completely and utterly put to rest any of the unfounded rumors coming from the Rubio campaign that Governor Crist would run as anything other than the Republican that he is.”
In the large and expanding universe of political lies, lying about one's intentions about seeking office or running as this or that is one of the lesser sorts of lies. To an extent, everyone will "understand" (as in, partly forgive) Crist's lies and broken promises about this, as they understand that, being a politician, he says what he says and does what he does to get elected.
But that's still a lie, and Crist really can't make up for it by articulating a compelling rationale for his new-found devotion to "The Party of Bernie Sanders." The state has a lot of Obama supporters, and I suppose he could make a play for those, but why wouldn't they support the Obama-endorsed candidate, Kendrick Meeks?
He can try for voters fed up with both parties, but the trouble with those people is they typically don't vote. Even if he were to inspire them to vote, those votes wouldn't be coming out of Rubio's hide. They'd basically be fresh voters no one was expecting to show up, and will get him into double-digits, and that's about it.
And he's the wrong sort of person to tap into such anger, anyway. He's not a passionate, crusading Howard Beale type. He's a cautious -- timid, really -- calculating establishment poll-watcher.
If Crist attempts making himself over into some "Mad as Hell" revolutionary, it promises to be an election filled with comedy, and pathos.
Charlie Crist
Bold New Leadership.*
* Disclaimer: Leadership is neither bold, nor new, and also is not leadership. But he does look a little like the guy who played J. Peterman on Seinfeld.
Rewrite:
The Guy Who Played J. Peterman on Seinfeld
He knows George's ATM code is "Bosco" and is fluent in Gibberish.
Crist Offering Donors Prorated Refunds: Prorated, I guess, so he can keep half or more of the money, and claim he gets to keep his the prorated share of it to reflect the time he spent as a Republican.
Where Will Crist's Money Come From? It's not like he's a charismatic new face with a compelling story. Democratic money will tend to go to the Democrat, with a little tossed Crist's way in order to help him mount a spoiler campaign against Rubio.
GOP money will 95% go to Rubio. The GOP tends to be establishment, and Crist is breaking the polite rules of politics (run in the primary, if you lose, support the winner). Even the smallish number of folks who are inclined to vote for a squish aren't going to like the selfish, spoiler aspect of his bid.
As the usually excellent Drew noted, even David Frum is bothered by the spoilsport nature of Crist's self-serving jump.
Online donations from out of state liberals and "moderate" Republicans? I guess I can see Kos pimping Crist a lot, trying to get him nutroots money. But that's not going to be a welter of money, like Scott Brown saw.
Posted by: Ace at
10:17 AM
| Comments (132)
Post contains 1143 words, total size 8 kb.
I have absolutely no factual basis for this other than the realization that they are all a bunch of corrupt weasels.
Posted by: real joe at April 29, 2010 10:23 AM (IpIBJ)
Republicans won't want to take him back after leaving them while Democrats may use him on occasion and then leave a $20 on the dresser, but nothing more substantial than that.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 29, 2010 10:24 AM (S/HSv)
Why would you pull the lever for someone like Crist who has no position on the primary issue of the day besides what is currently best for Crist...
Posted by: 18-1 at April 29, 2010 10:25 AM (7BU4a)
Will that be the case in November? Dunno, but one can hope.
Posted by: irongrampa at April 29, 2010 10:25 AM (ud5dN)
Fork. Stick it in him already.
His political career is ovah.
That ad by Rubio is fab. Making the oompa loopma eat his words. Nothing more.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 29, 2010 10:25 AM (pLTLS)
Of course Crist is toast both in this race and future elections. But the question is whether or not Crist will steal >5% or <5% of Rubio's votes.
Posted by: Loopy de Loop at April 29, 2010 10:25 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: volfan at April 29, 2010 10:25 AM (Tuf1i)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 29, 2010 10:28 AM (N+Kix)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 29, 2010 10:30 AM (N+Kix)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 29, 2010 10:30 AM (UOM48)
Stand up guy, one of us.
I'm not sure where it all went wrong.
Posted by: Sen. John Cornyn at April 29, 2010 10:33 AM (9B5OK)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at April 29, 2010 10:34 AM (I1/U/)
I mean, it's not like he's a Republican or anything anymore, right?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at April 29, 2010 10:35 AM (IVQSY)
But he has the best tan in politics, for crying out loud! That has to count for something!
Come on! Who hasn't wanted their own orange senator?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 29, 2010 10:36 AM (RkRxq)
The smartest move for Crist would have been to accept defeat and endorse Rubio.
He's never going to outpoll Rubio, so that means that he simply CANNOT win the election. At "best" he can serve as a "spoiler" candidate to siphon votes away from Rubio, and in that case, the Dem wins.
Presuming that Crist knows this, he's probably just looking for some sort of payoff (which he won't get from a Republican).
I think Crist is going to run into fundraising issues and have to drop out.
Posted by: looking closely at April 29, 2010 10:36 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 29, 2010 10:36 AM (UOM48)
It's going to be pretty tough to craft a message that pleases both small-government GOP and tea party voters and Obama-supporting Meek supporters.
Posted by: Slublog at April 29, 2010 10:37 AM (qjKko)
I'm increasingly thinking that this is little more than an overtly dick move towards Rubio. He's not campaigning to win anymore, he's campaigning to make Rubio lose. Crist's inherent squishiness and flirting with the Dems isn't really as important to him anymore.
In Oompa-Loompa's mind, the knuckledraggers who've taken over the party deserve to be chastised, Rubio first among them.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 29, 2010 10:38 AM (ZSVyF)
The Guy Who Played J. Peterman on Seinfeld
Heh. That's a nice tie-in to Slu's sombrero below.
The Urban Sombrero!!
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 29, 2010 10:39 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Gov. Charlie Crist, Human Traffic Cone at April 29, 2010 10:39 AM (QKKT0)
Will that be the case in November? Dunno, but one can hope.
Posted by: irongrampa at April 29, 2010 02:25 PM (ud5dN)
Yeah, I REALLY believe that LGF reflects the enthusiastic voter base of the USA, much less Florida. Coming from that quarter, the label "right-wing tool" is a badge of honor: anyone so labeled by that source automatically jumps up in my estimation.
Posted by: stuiec at April 29, 2010 10:40 AM (W+GYq)
Republican Tea Party movement could get first state senator America's burgeoning Tea Party movement is on course to get its first state senator.
Posted by: stuiec at April 29, 2010 10:42 AM (W+GYq)
Charlie Crist never smiles
So lend your love to me, awhile
Do with me what you will
Break the spell take your fill
F-f-f-foolin'.
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 29, 2010 10:43 AM (0QJjg)
Crist used poor judgement. He should not hold office as he obviously holds himslef dearer than his "principles". In other words, like McCain, he is a member of the 2nd oldest profession, and is willing to dabble in the first oldest.
Posted by: maddogg at April 29, 2010 10:44 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Jean at April 29, 2010 10:44 AM (7K04W)
It looks that way, but even stipulating that its true, it still may not work.
As mentioned above, Crist simply won't outpoll Rubio; barring some unforeseen catastrophe where one of the other two candidates has to drop out, he can't win the election. Comparing to a two-way election, the only way he can alter the results of the election is if he takes more votes from Meeks than he takes from Rubio and the vote is close enough that that's the determining factor. Neither one of these two things is a foregone conclusion at this point.
Again, what's probably going to happen is that Crists numbers are just going to be continually whittled down from now until election time. Given the expense and effort involved in campaigning, there will be a lot of pressure on Crist to drop out.
Posted by: looking closely at April 29, 2010 10:46 AM (6Q9g2)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 29, 2010 10:46 AM (N+Kix)
Posted by: Jean at April 29, 2010 10:46 AM (7K04W)
Just looking at the # breakdown, in a month or two the polls will 45% R, 40D, 10I.
By election day, it'll be 50% for Rubio and 5% for Crist.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 29, 2010 10:47 AM (7VvJB)
Crist's deepest regret of his senate bid: he wishes he could pick a running mate, ifyouknowImean...
Posted by: Loopy de Loop at April 29, 2010 10:48 AM (uFokq)
This.
And, if you will, morons, please pretend for a moment that Crist isn't an ego-poisoned self-mutilating emo dipshit. If he's going down for something, what is it?
Settled science says he lost the primary because he went along with Obama on bailouts and shit, right? Who, yesterday, did the same thing?
2+2? Maybe.
Posted by: oblig. at April 29, 2010 10:49 AM (x7Ao8)
Posted by: Jean at April 29, 2010 10:49 AM (7K04W)
Posted by: joncelli at April 29, 2010 10:50 AM (RD7QR)
"Without fanfare, the United Nations this week
elected Iran to its Commission on the Status of Women,
handing a four-year seat on the influential human rights
body to a theocratic state in which stoning is enshrine
in law and lashings are required for women judged "immodest."
Posted by: Mjim at April 29, 2010 10:50 AM (V8B//)
This is the problem: the debates.
The three of them will be on the stage and it will be two-against-one. And Crist will only attack Rubio, thus forcing Marco to focus on answering Crist's attacks, therefore leaving little time for Marco to go after Meeks.
And that, me friends, is how Deval Patrick won in Massachusetts.
Posted by: Loopy de Loop at April 29, 2010 10:51 AM (uFokq)
And I think 6% of them are liars. But one thing we always seem to confuse is the difference between an independent and an "undecided". Almost all independents normally vote for one Party. Sometimes in periods of great turmoil they may cross over. The undecideds are just clueless idiots.
Remember the New Jersey governor's race? Independent Christopher Daggett was polling at 10%, but only got 5.8% on Election Day. there's a reason for that. American elections are winner take all, which makes it very difficult for third parties to thrive.
Or another reason could be that a lot of voters will lie to pollsters.
This is a dishonest and nakedly self-interested move, and voters are fed up with this kind of behavior.
Now I agree with that 100% which is why I said a few weeks ago when this Crist as an independent may happen that it would be a good thing. Yes, he will be lucky if he actually gets 1% in the actual vote while Rubio goes on to win by 10%.
And in the end, Crist will history politically. He'll have to take a lobbying job, if they'll have him. Trouble is, nobody likes a traitor after the war is over.
So yes, I think this is overall good for Republicans. They will win in a cakewalk at the same time they get rid of a traitorous RINO.
Posted by: Vic at April 29, 2010 10:52 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: robtr at April 29, 2010 10:52 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 29, 2010 10:52 AM (N+Kix)
He also said, he's fucked if he leaves the party. No one is going to raise money for him, and he is dead in the shed.
Let him rot.
Posted by: Kemp at April 29, 2010 10:52 AM (vSiVD)
Posted by: joncelli at April 29, 2010 10:52 AM (RD7QR)
The easy way to deal with that is either force him out of the debate or ignore him.
Posted by: Vic at April 29, 2010 10:54 AM (QrA9E)
Not quite. Tank killed Dukakis...
Posted by: Mallamutt at April 29, 2010 02:51 PM (V9SYy)
Not to put too fine a point on it, but I think Willie Horton killed Mike Dukakis. The Tank, however, did do a terrific job of burying his remains.
Posted by: Nighthawk at April 29, 2010 11:00 AM (OtQXp)
I'd also like to know how close Crist is to Lindsey Graham, if at all. I'm not saying they're close, but I'm wondering if they're friends.
If they're friends, I think we found Crist's politcal advisor. I think Graham is a shitheel and gives not a shit for the good of the GOP. Just throwing that little conspiracy theory out there...
Posted by: Loopy de Loop at April 29, 2010 11:01 AM (uFokq)
and he is dead in the shed.
Dead in a shed is not way to go, my friends.
Posted by: Zombie John Wilkes Booth at April 29, 2010 02:54 PM (V9SYy)
It was a barn actually, on US 301 in Caroline Co., Va. How do I know that shit, our old farm was not far from the site.
Posted by: Kemp at April 29, 2010 11:01 AM (vSiVD)
Posted by: Jean at April 29, 2010 11:01 AM (tJF9l)
but really, we need to find out who is advising Crist because I think connecting the dots would be very interesting
Posted by: Loopy de Loop at April 29, 2010 11:02 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Charlie Brown Crist at April 29, 2010 11:03 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: Anderson Cooper at April 29, 2010 11:04 AM (V8B//)
If they're friends, I think we found Crist's politcal advisor. I think Graham is a shitheel and gives not a shit for the good of the GOP. Just throwing that little conspiracy theory out there...
Posted by: Loopy de Loop at April 29, 2010 03:01 PM (uFokq)
I think Lindsey Graham is looking closely at Specter and Crist to see if he should follow them into the independent/party switch strategy down the road. I could easily see Graham pull a Lincoln Chaffee if the midterms put the Senate at 50-50.
Posted by: stuiec at April 29, 2010 11:05 AM (W+GYq)
Well that and a deep blue state.
I am much more worried about other senate races than FL. Rubio will be fine.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 29, 2010 11:06 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: LeBron Steinman at April 29, 2010 11:07 AM (ksgMh)
Posted by: the Butcher at April 29, 2010 11:08 AM (8g9qq)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 29, 2010 11:08 AM (N+Kix)
If they're friends, I think we found Crist's politcal advisor. I think Graham is a shitheel and gives not a shit for the good of the GOP.
Lindsey Graham was rejected for membership years ago. Retract your statement or you'll next hear from our legal counsel.
Posted by: Int'l Brotherhood of Shitheels, Cads, Weasels Turncoats at April 29, 2010 11:09 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Vyceroy at April 29, 2010 11:10 AM (C/kwd)
elected Iran to its Commission on the Status of Women,
handing a four-year seat on the influential human rights
body to a theocratic state in which stoning is enshrine
in law and lashings are required for women judged "immodest."
Posted by: Mjim
Look, Iran has very detailed opinions on the status of women. You just don't like their opinion, h8ter.
Posted by: Progressive Libtard at April 29, 2010 11:11 AM (LEynS)
That's ridiculous.
Posted by: Mike Bloomberg at April 29, 2010 11:15 AM (ZSVyF)
Technically, I'm not an office holder.
Wait, who we talking about here?
Posted by: Mike "Holla" Steele at April 29, 2010 11:15 AM (gQ+XA)
Posted by: Andrea Mitchell at April 29, 2010 11:15 AM (N+Kix)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 29, 2010 11:15 AM (qSRHZ)
We're not enamored of you either.
Posted by: IRA at April 29, 2010 03:15 PM (R2fpr)
We got your guns bitch so STFU
Posted by: Orange People United at April 29, 2010 11:17 AM (fwSHf)
As long as he thinks he can hurt Rubio, he'll stay in the race.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 29, 2010 11:18 AM (ZSVyF)
Posted by: Orange People United at April 29, 2010 11:18 AM (fwSHf)
As long as he thinks he can hurt Rubio, he'll stay in the race.
He's either looking for a payoff from the R's, or has already received one from the dems.
Posted by: Dang Straights at April 29, 2010 11:18 AM (fx8sm)
O/T here, but this guy is a perfect O nominee.
Methinks him and Kevin Jennings are BFFs (in that oh so special way).
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 29, 2010 11:19 AM (pLTLS)
It doesn't matter if it was a barn or a shed, he didn't die inside it. He was shot inside it and died outside on the ground some time later.
Posted by: Today's Nitpicker at April 29, 2010 11:19 AM (QrA9E)
We're not enamored of you either.
Posted by: IRA at April 29, 2010 03:15 PM (R2fpr)
We got your guns bitch so STFU
Posted by: Orange People United
That't right; feel content at the sight of the guns we turned in. That, and the pleasant ticking sound you hear come from your morning post. isn't it calming and reasuuri.................
Posted by: IRA at April 29, 2010 11:19 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Warden at April 29, 2010 11:20 AM (TIGTh)
Don't forget, the party faithful that staff the offices, drive people to the polls, and make telephone calls all tend to be more conservative than the squishes.
Posted by: MrCaniac at April 29, 2010 11:20 AM (Vol3D)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at April 29, 2010 11:21 AM (1hM1d)
While we're discussing Florida Senatorial politics:
http://bit.ly/cWwEcn - Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida called Thursday for a halt to exploratory oil operations in coastal waters and said he plans to introduce legislation to block expanded off-shore drilling while authorities investigate the explosion and fire that sank an oil rig in the Gulf Coast.
In addition, Nelson said he would file legislation "that would for the time being prohibit the Interior Department from acting on your administration's plans to expand offshore drilling, including seismic testing and other exploratory operations."
Posted by: conscious and declaring Crist is toast at April 29, 2010 11:21 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at April 29, 2010 11:22 AM (I1/U/)
Best strategy for Rubio: completely ignore Crist; just focus on Meeks, no matter what Crist throws at him. Eventually Crist will fade away.
Rubio needs to make the race between himself and Meeks. Or else Marco gets sucked into Crist's and the Democrat's trap.
Posted by: Coffin at April 29, 2010 11:23 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: conscious and declaring Crist is toast at April 29, 2010 11:26 AM (YVZlY)
re: Posted by: conscious and declaring Crist is toast at April 29, 2010 03:21 PM (YVZlY)
What they give with one hand, they take away with the other.
Posted by: Randy at April 29, 2010 11:26 AM (zQKSr)
Once he registers, he's on the ballot, and he has an in to the debates. Most of the possible damage will stem from these.If he's in as a spoiler, it doesn't matter if he cannot buy more ad time or signage. Someone above has already hit upon it. If he is going to seriously mount a third party bid, he'll run to the left aginst the Dem. Since that means running against running against Dem money and entrenched support, it's doubtful.As a spoiler, he needs only the entrance fee, a willing media (which he'll have) and a pulse. And since dead people have been elected, he may not even need that. I want to place a bet now that within a month, he be heralded as an underdog.
Any takers?
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 29, 2010 11:27 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 29, 2010 11:29 AM (qSRHZ)
You're just jealous because YOU don't have a six-figure Soros-funded think-tank gig.
Posted by: Charlie Crist at April 29, 2010 11:30 AM (mR7mk)
Breaking news....stocks in tanning sprays & creams hit hardest. Ooompa Loompa Union vows a national boycott! They want reparations!!
Posted by: dananjcon at April 29, 2010 11:30 AM (pr+up)
CHICAGO (AP) -iamondbacks. About 40 immigrant rights activists chanting "Boycott Arizona" have gathered outside Wrigley Field in Chicago as the Cubs open a four-game series against the Arizona D
can someone please put me some knowledge and esplain to me what baseball has to do with friggin mess?
Posted by: dananjcon at April 29, 2010 11:34 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: blargo at April 29, 2010 11:35 AM (iakcA)
Posted by: C. Christ at April 29, 2010 11:35 AM (DHNp4)
Well, it's obvious Nelson didn't actually read those plans. The "expansion" is worthless, and puny in size compared to the areas those plans put drilling off-limits.
Posted by: Charlie Crist at April 29, 2010 11:36 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: 48%er, 100% pissed off at April 29, 2010 11:36 AM (gxpfq)
None whatsoever. You were expecting ill-educated zealots to make sense?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 29, 2010 11:37 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: drfredc at April 29, 2010 11:37 AM (ljMiA)
Thanks for that image.
*reaches for the val-u-rite bottle*
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 29, 2010 11:42 AM (ZSVyF)
Fine. But, apparently, as a Republican, he was one In Name Only. So he gets to keep all the Money In Name Only wooden nickels. The rest should be returned.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 29, 2010 11:42 AM (swuwV)
It was a barn actually, on US 301 in Caroline Co., Va. How do I know that shit, our old farm was not far from the site.
Like I've always said, one man's shed is another man's barn.
Posted by: George Obama Who Lives In A Hut (Or Envirnomentally Green Compound) at April 29, 2010 11:42 AM (CfmlF)
What a fool.
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 29, 2010 11:43 AM (W+E+o)
Posted by: Stan25 at April 29, 2010 11:44 AM (N1Gru)
Speaking of endorsements...
What are the odds Crist tries to use Sarah Palin's endorsement of Marco against him? Pretty good, I think. Won't that be rich.
Posted by: Loopy de Loop at April 29, 2010 11:44 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: runningrn at April 29, 2010 11:45 AM (CfmlF)
"BECAUSE NOBODY PUTS BIG BABY IN THE CORNER!!11!!11"
Posted by: Charlie Crist at April 29, 2010 11:50 AM (CfmlF)
The only compelling motivation that Charlie Crist has to run as an Independent is so that Charlie Crist can stay in elective office.
Is it possible to receive a negative amount of votes?
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 29, 2010 11:53 AM (P33XN)
This hints at what may be his only card, and it's still a bad one. If you're about to end your political career, you might try cashing out by siphoning off as much campaign money as possible. Act like you're running, put up the web donation site, run a short campaign that costs nothing, and bail. Use the contributions as a retirement fund and hope to come back a few years from now for a different, lower office if you still want work.
Not that I think he could pull it off anyway because, really, which mythical super-passionate independent fence-sitter is going to give money?
Crist is running a campaign worse than McCain '08. Let that sink in.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 29, 2010 11:54 AM (swuwV)
Posted by: runningrn at April 29, 2010 11:58 AM (CfmlF)
If your criteria for measurement is based on voters living at ground level being positive, and six feet under at time of voting as being negative, then I'd say yes. It's popularly referred to in modern culture as 'the Chicago Way'.
Reminds me of that great scene from the Untouchables: "They send one of our guys to the morgue, we send him to the polling place."
Posted by: runningrn at April 29, 2010 12:01 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Cortillaen at April 29, 2010 12:02 PM (gusJY)
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 29, 2010 12:03 PM (W+E+o)
Not trying to sound prejudiced or anything,
but NEVER trust an Oompah Loompah outside of a candy factory...
just sayin'.....
Posted by: Gerry Owen at April 29, 2010 12:03 PM (4Hy88)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 29, 2010 12:06 PM (0QJjg)
but really, we need to find out who is advising Crist because I think connecting the dots would be very interesting
Posted by: Loopy de LoopRob Jesmer.
(there are other blogs on the 'nets, you know)
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 29, 2010 12:06 PM (zgd5N)
Other than AoS, are there any that are worth a bucket of warm piss?
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 29, 2010 12:10 PM (ZSVyF)
I'm just sayin'....
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 29, 2010 12:16 PM (ZSVyF)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur
Well, if the question is "we need to find out who is advising Crist because I think connecting the dots would be very interesting," then yes.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 29, 2010 12:24 PM (zgd5N)
This is the problem: the debates.
The three of them will be on the stage and it will be two-against-one. And Crist will only attack Rubio, thus forcing Marco to focus on answering Crist's attacks, therefore leaving little time for Marco to go after Meeks.
And that, me friends, is how Deval Patrick won in Massachusetts.
I believe that's how Clinton won in '92. Perot was able to attack Bush from the right...ish and Clinton from the usual left. Then it became a question of: "So which alternative to George Bush do you like better?
Posted by: AmishDude at April 29, 2010 12:58 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: T8 to T5 adapter Kits at April 29, 2010 11:22 PM (fZBrR)
Posted by: weight loss at April 30, 2010 12:52 AM (lAoNn)
Posted by: Crush Liberalism at April 30, 2010 02:38 AM (pp4+H)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2378 seconds, 260 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








How many Specters and Chafees before the Republican leadership wakes up?
Posted by: 18-1 at April 29, 2010 10:21 AM (7BU4a)