February 14, 2010
— Gabriel Malor It's Valentine's Day and the Cheneys are ripping apart the Obama Administration. Could this morning have been any better?
First up, was Liz on Fox News Sunday:
"What you have is a situation where, unquestionably, we did go through a period in this nation's history where we dealt with terrorism as a law enforcement matter. And as Attorney General Mukasey has pointed out recently, when we prosecuted and successfully convicted people after the '93 World Trade Center bombing, after the East African bombing, what it got us was 9/11 and 3000 dead Americans."So the notion that while the Bush Administration did this, I find it perplexing as a political argument to hear that from this administration. I think they're confusing the facts and the law with respect to many of those terrorists, but it's not surprising because there is a level of incompetence that you're seeing from people like Brennan and others that scares the American people. So I'm not surprised they're trying to divert attention."
Gateway Pundit has video where she also smacks around Juan Williams.
Second, Dick Cheney was on ABC's This Week talking about the same thing, plus Afghanistan and Iraq. Cheney laughed outright at the Vice President's suggestion that Iraq would be one of Obama's "greatest achievements." He excoriated the Obama Administration for deciding to Mirandize the Christmas Day bomber.
When asked about DADT, Cheney stated:
"Twenty years ago, the military were strong advocates of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' when I was Secretary of Defense. I think things have changed significantly since then. I see that Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has indicated his belief that we ought to support a change in the policy. So I think, my guess is the policy will be changed."I think the society has moved on. I think it's partly a generational question. I say, I'm reluctant to second-guess the military in this regard, because they're the ones that have got to make the judgment about how these policies affect the military capability of our units. And that first requirement that you have to look at all the time is whether or not they're still capable of achieving their mission, and does the policy change--i.e., putting gays in the force--affect their ability to perform their mission? When the chiefs come forward and say, 'We think we can do it,' then it strikes me that it's -- it's time to reconsider the policy. And I think Admiral Mullen said that."
Incidentally, the results from the Military Times' annual DADT survey of active-duty troops have been released. There is a major methodology issue with this survey--it is drawn from info voluntarily offered by subscribers of the Military Times publications, rather than a random sample of active-duty troops. Until the DOD completes its year-long review, however, it is the only info we've got where active-duty soldiers, sailors, and marines are asked about Don't Ask, Don't Tell. Asking actual troops seems like an important first step to me.
51% of active duty service members opposed allowing gays to serve openly in the military. That's down from 63% in 2004. 30% favor allowing gays to serve openly, up from 24%. 20% were neutral or declined to answer, up from 11% in 2004.
Like Dick Cheney, a majority (55.7%)of respondents of the Military Times survey believed that military leaders should decide whether the policy should be changed or kept in place. Only 14.6% said that Congress should decide. 14.8% said it was the President's decision.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
08:56 AM
| Comments (102)
Post contains 598 words, total size 4 kb.
Biden is cussing mad over Cheney bitch-smacking him and his boss all over the airwaves today.
Good.
Posted by: Blazer at February 14, 2010 09:01 AM (t72+4)
Biden is cussing mad over Cheney bitch-smacking cock-slapping him and his boss all over the airwaves today.
Good.
Posted by: Blazer at February 14, 2010 01:01 PM (t72+4)
FIFme
Posted by: Blazer at February 14, 2010 09:02 AM (t72+4)
What a bitch slapping, and the little prick Juan deserves every bit of it, everyday. That twit would have been off the air years ago, except for his rather dark skin.
Posted by: Kemp at February 14, 2010 09:05 AM (2+9Yx)
Liz throws in a box of chocolate covered nancy girls.
Liz is coming on strong.....would love to see her run.
Posted by: JavaJoe at February 14, 2010 09:08 AM (e9JZd)
As usual, Cheney gets it dead right, and in just a few words. I don't know if gays openly serving in the military would degrade unit cohesion or overall effectiveness, but that is the only consideration. I wish the same rule was applied to Joe Biden and the effectiveness of our government. He'd last a femtosecond.
Posted by: pep at February 14, 2010 09:08 AM (0K3p3)
Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams was released from a U.S. hospital on Friday after having to flee his own dysfunctional government-run health care system in order to obtain a critical heart surgery. While the procedure Williams needed does exist in Canada, it is widely unavailable.
This is due to the inevitable rationing (i.e., 'death panels') that occurs when government takes over health care and makes things more "fair"--by destroying competition, limiting consumer choice and creating shortages of doctors. This is the system Obama wants to duplicate here.
And such blatant special treatment for politicians is adding fuel to the fires of discontent in Canada, where citizens are forced to suffer through a broken, inferior government system that only works for the most superficial health care needs...while the leftist elites who force this insanity on everyone else get to be exempted and fly here for quality free market care.
Canadians will gladly spend 80 bucks a night drinking beer, but when it come to contributing to their health, they won't pay a cent. It is for this I disagree with the "collective" having to pay for this system.
Communists are evil and should be eliminated.
Posted by: sickinmass at February 14, 2010 09:09 AM (Dxfei)
While every other pollster (including the uber-left CBSNews/WAPO) has Obama's poll numbers plummeting, life is BEAUTIFUL over at Gallup. In the last week, his poll numbers have SURGED by 6 points, from 47 to close at 53% today.
Inexplicably, at the same time, Gallup announces that only 36% of Americans approve of Obama's handling of the economy (by far the #1 issue to Americans). Only on International Affairs does Obama score above 50% coming in at 51%.
So, on every issue Obama is below 51% and on the BIG issues, he is in the 30's. Yet, In Gallup-land, his overall approval is 53%. In other words America is saying, "We HATE everything you are doing and stand for but we LUUUURV YOU you sexy boy!".
Why do I have a sneaking suspicion that Gallup also works for the IPCC in their Climate-modeling division?
Posted by: Bill MItchell at February 14, 2010 09:10 AM (kEBiX)
Dick Cheney is wrong.
And he can go fuck himself. He was a lousy vice president and George Bush sucks for keeping him. Neither of them gave a shit about the future of the GOP and they used us (the conservatives) to get elected.
Bush & Cheney Legacy: President Barack Hussein Obama
Posted by: This is... at February 14, 2010 09:10 AM (a4A0f)
Posted by: Kemp at February 14, 2010 09:12 AM (2+9Yx)
He was a lousy vice president
How so?
Bush & Cheney Legacy: President Barack Hussein Obama
You can't leave McCain out of that equation. Or Deputy Dawg Huckabee.
Posted by: loppyd at February 14, 2010 09:12 AM (pGELo)
Posted by: robtr at February 14, 2010 09:12 AM (fwSHf)
51% of active duty service members opposed allowing gays to serve openly in the military. That's down from 63% in 2004. 30% favor allowing gays to serve openly, up from 24%. 20% were neutral or declined to answer, up from 11% in 2004.
Like Dick Cheney, a majority (55.7%)of respondents of the Military
Times survey believed that military leaders should decide whether the
policy should be changed or kept in place. Only 14.6% said that
Congress should decide. 14.8% said it was the President's decision.
Really? 55.7% don't believe in civilian control of the military? That's rather scary.
Two other results of interest 57% of the respondents said they were serving with a homosexual, but 89% of those have declined to report the individual. I'm not sure how that squares with the 50%+ that sasy DADT maintains good order and discipline. Generally just ignoring regulations isn't considered to be very effective in maintaing discipline.
Posted by: chad at February 14, 2010 09:16 AM (WNcvq)
Of course. But the point is Bush left us high & dry for 2008.
After they won in 2004 they didn't give a shit about the party or their supporters. We stood there like assholes defending that admin...because the admin wouldn't defend itself. They didn't care.
I never bought into that neo-con crap or believed it even existed. But now in retrospect, we were duped by Republicans who are pro-business, pro-illegal immigration (because it's good for business' bottom line), pro-war, pro-defense, pro-spending, and pro-taxcuts. What a fucked up set of core values.
Posted by: This is... at February 14, 2010 09:18 AM (a4A0f)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at February 14, 2010 09:19 AM (a9UO0)
We stood there like assholes defending that admin...because the admin wouldn't defend itself. They didn't care
I'll give you that.
Posted by: loppyd at February 14, 2010 09:19 AM (pGELo)
Tomorrow Obama will be taking credit for the 1968 moon landing and will be awarded 14 Olympic Gold Medals to go with his peace prize.
Posted by: robtr at February 14, 2010 01:12 PM (fwSHf)
The only moon Obama can take credit for landing on is Larry Sinclair's.
Posted by: Blazer at February 14, 2010 09:19 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at February 14, 2010 09:19 AM (V/EYZ)
Posted by: bergerbilder at February 14, 2010 09:20 AM (S1Ttj)
I don't think they are saying the military is outside of civilian control. The implication is that the civilians defer to military expertise in deciding the issue. Their deference is their option, not the military's.
Posted by: pep at February 14, 2010 09:22 AM (0K3p3)
Posted by: loppyd at February 14, 2010 09:26 AM (pGELo)
I can't believe he's taking credit for winning the war....
Posted by: JavaJoe at February 14, 2010 01:22 PM (e9JZd)
The MSM and the left are desperate to give this guy a win no matter what since he's failed on just about everything else. I am not shocked at all they are trying to give him all the credit for a victory, nevermind the fact that he fought tooth and nail the entire time he was in Congress to undermine and smear our last president our troops and their commanders.
Posted by: Blazer at February 14, 2010 09:26 AM (t72+4)
Haven't our top leaders in our military shown how foolish and inept they are?
To wit: Malik Nadil Hassan.
Purely out of political correctness and 'diversity, they, in their esteemed military judgment, not only ignored his ties with Islamofascist terror and his anti-Americanism, they promoted him.
Our top brass is so inept, we still, after 8 years, have soldiers and troops being blown up by 12th century barbarians. When they can figure out how to beat the muslim barbarians (with an annual budget of over $500B), then they think about tackling other far less important issues in the military.
Posted by: This is... at February 14, 2010 09:27 AM (a4A0f)
I can't believe he'staking credit for winning the war....
Posted by: JavaJoe at February 14, 2010 01:22 PM (e9JZd)
That's the only thing he didn't "inherit" I guess
Posted by: robtr at February 14, 2010 09:28 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Frank G at February 14, 2010 09:32 AM (4X0aT)
Posted by: Noah at February 14, 2010 09:33 AM (mhD2v)
Fuck yourself. That is exactly what that answer says. In case you haven't read the Constitution lately it names the President as Commander in Chief and gives Congress the responsibility for establishing the rules and laws for the governance of the armed forces. When you say they shouldn't have input then you put the military outside civilian control.
Shiteater.
Posted by: chad at February 14, 2010 09:35 AM (WNcvq)
Dick Cheney: Hey, Biden..get a load of this..
*Zip*.......*thud*
Slow Joe: Holy shit. It even has "Louisville Slugger" branded onto it....... Hey don't swing that at me
*WHAP*...*THUNK*
Slow Joe: Ow...fuck Dick, put that damn thing away!!
Dick Cheney: That was for being a stupid asshole and taking credit for Iraq..*reel..reel...reel...reel...tuck ...ZIP!!!* Don't make me take it out again
,
Posted by: Meet the Cock at February 14, 2010 09:35 AM (AnTyA)
This is . . . @28
Where'd all that PC crap come from? Civilians.
Posted by: arhooley at February 14, 2010 09:36 AM (23n/G)
Posted by: Walter Mondale at February 14, 2010 09:37 AM (YX6i/)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 14, 2010 09:38 AM (DTffv)
Posted by: arhooley at February 14, 2010 09:39 AM (23n/G)
I know you are probably correct in your assumption. On polls like these questions are easily open to misintreptation. Despite my answer to Mr. Pink @22 I don't really think that the military is planning a coup or anything of that nature. I was making a point about the results, that is also why I included the bit about the lack of reporting of gays to the Chain of Command.
Posted by: chad at February 14, 2010 09:39 AM (WNcvq)
Posted by: eman at February 14, 2010 09:40 AM (4tixt)
You can go boil yourself in oil, you pathetic little punk. I'm guessing you weren't in the uniformed ranks the last time the whole "gays in the military" thing became a big issue - or ever. The servicemembers thinking uniformed leaders "should" decide does not equate to "no civilian control". Period. End of fucking discussion. Now go fuck off and die.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 14, 2010 09:42 AM (DTffv)
Haven't our top leaders in our military shown how foolish and inept they are?
To wit: Malik Nadil Hassan.
This is the real problem. They'll have to quadruple the JAG corps if they get rid of DADT.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 14, 2010 09:43 AM (Vo2Ef)
Today:
"Biden suggests that Iraq will be one of Obama's greatest achievements."
Several months from now after Obama pulls troops out of Iraq and it plummets back into civil war and chaos.
"Biden suggests that Bush should never have put us in Iraq in the first place and that Obama's "positions" on the Iraq war were right all along."
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at February 14, 2010 09:46 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: eman at February 14, 2010 09:49 AM (4tixt)
Posted by: nikkolai at February 14, 2010 09:49 AM (U0lNn)
Posted by: don't mess with Dick at February 14, 2010 09:51 AM (Ue9UN)
Is Maher fine tuning his upcoming USO tour?
Posted by: eman at February 14, 2010 01:49 PM (4tixt)
Do the Taliban and Al Qaeda even have a USO like organization ?
Posted by: Blazer at February 14, 2010 09:52 AM (t72+4)
28 Yes and no. Unfortunately, due to the social climate in which we live, if any military person would have blown the whistle on Hassan they would have wound up with a destroyed life -- the media, academia, society itself, would have called for that person to be pilloried, and the administration would have acquiesced. The military has been nearly destroyed by society's pc rules. A lot of shit happens with women who are in (and don't get me wrong, I was in, my girls are in -- women can serve and serve well, but man, not every woman is going to be professional and the ones who aren't are a freaking joke and a problem).
As for gay people in the ranks -- yes, they are there, and if they're decent troops they should stay (which means if they don't mind their p's and q's you wind up having to lie and cover for them -- which is a discipline problem and honestly, sets them up to be blackmailed, which isn't very good either). If all gays were professional or at least non-predatory, it would be no problem with openly serving gays in the military -- but there are some that predatory and/or shit stirrers, and they are a big soup sandwich (and since they are a protected group as per society's pc rules, well, it could really cause problems). We really can't have protected "special" groups in the military -- we already have too much of that now (I'd argue it isn't good for society either, but in the military that's x100).
As for losing to the barbarians: well, we're at war with them. People get killed in wars. We have been very fortunate to not have suffered high casualty rates (and we haven't; I know to the individuals' families that might not seem so, but we haven't). But society seems to have a problem with every troop lost -- they seem to forget that this is a professional military and possibly getting killed is part of the job description -- so the military can't have casualties without a cry of "we're losing the war, we're getting people killed! the horror! the horror!"...JFC on a bike.
And people in the military do recognize this as a problem that has been put upon them by society -- they see society as a very big reason for a lot of their troubles...so of course they don't think society should be telling them what to do (now, that's just been the take on it by the military folks I know). The pc bullshit and over sensitive crap from civilian society has got. to. go.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 14, 2010 09:57 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at February 14, 2010 09:57 AM (Vu6sl)
Maher and his ilk will never get it until he and/or one of his family members become victims of a domestic suicide bomber. However, even then, he would still blame it on Bush that it actually happened.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at February 14, 2010 01:57 PM (Vu6sl)
Maher is the prime reason I have refused to have anything to do with HBO for the past several years.
Posted by: Blazer at February 14, 2010 10:02 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Anachronda at February 14, 2010 10:03 AM (LD+ZJ)
Posted by: curious at February 14, 2010 10:06 AM (p302b)
Posted by: samizdat at February 14, 2010 01:57 PM (PD1tk)"
Actually, Valentine's day is the feast day of St. Valentine so hallmark didn't invent the holiday, the Catholic church invented it to honor St. Valentine. The MSM conveniently forgets that we are celebrating the feast day of a saint.
Posted by: curious at February 14, 2010 10:09 AM (p302b)
Posted by: bob_hussein_dole at February 14, 2010 10:24 AM (DLaJY)
If you have a problem with them you've got a problem with my devastating elbows.
Posted by: yambles at February 14, 2010 10:25 AM (rxaXW)
Let's see; 51% + 11% == 62% which given the rounding errors evident is insignificantly different from the 63% that disapproved in 2003.
What a shock!!!!
Seems to me, some of the respondents either know someone gay and for whatever reason don't want their opinion to become known AND/OR some are skeptical that particular respondents' answers will become known to Command (and THEY might be known/assumed to be gay) and want to have a career.
Does anyone believe that the answers given by respondents to a questionnaire known and approved by Command will never be known?
If so, please contact me as I have an old bridge located in Brooklyn, New York that I wish to sell at a reduced price.
Posted by: jakee308 at February 14, 2010 10:35 AM (puYmU)
You would assume wrong. I actually was an E-6 at the time, but beyond that it's not my fault that a) you can't read and b) are completely unfamiliar with the Constitution. Thanks for playing though shitbird.
Posted by: chad at February 14, 2010 10:35 AM (WNcvq)
Posted by: Lt. Go Ahead and Ask at February 14, 2010 10:46 AM (ZpmXe)
My understanding is that it's been the administration pushing to remove DADT with some military leaders supporting that notion -- not a request made by the rank and file military up the ranks and forwarded to the administration. If I were a general worrying about budget cuts, I guess I'd be tempted to say the "right" things to the media, too.
At the end of the day, is this a friggin' priority?
Posted by: Y-not at February 14, 2010 10:53 AM (X69zM)
Posted by: jakee308 at February 14, 2010 02:35 PM (puYmU)
The answer to this stupid question is YES. I took many random surveys over 20 years of service. My name was never on any of them so you tell me how command would ever know who answered what way?
Posted by: Bill R. at February 14, 2010 10:56 AM (EhlQq)
They dont call him Dick Cheney for nuthin'...........
Stop that, girl. I admire the man's achievements. I don't need to develop an inferiority complex.
Posted by: 141 Driver at February 14, 2010 11:01 AM (JFNQ7)
had a little too much bullshitbutter on your toast this morning?
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at February 14, 2010 11:03 AM (LZ4ZN)
I'm not disputing your answer, but I don't think the question was that stupid.
In high school I participated in a (supposedly anonymous) survey conducted by Johns Hopkins researchers that was conducted without parental permission. When I told my mom some of the questions, which were intensely personal and inappropriate in nature, she raised a stink and demanded they pull my survey responses. Lo and behold, they were able to do so. Turned out we were given coded surveys.
Any time there's a survey given where the participants are drawn from a known pool (as opposed to completely randomly selected people from an unknown pool) you have a potential to track the answers back to the respondents. I'm not saying that happened to you, but if your employer is conducting the survey of employees, then the opportunity is there.
Posted by: Y-not at February 14, 2010 11:05 AM (X69zM)
I spent seven years and change in the military, split between two services (USMC 99-03, Army 03-06). In both services I was an infantryman, which is about the be-all and end-all of military machoness.
The only people I ever saw DADT used against were shitheads who the command were happy to get rid of anyway. If a guy was good to go, nobody cared. If they change the policy, there'll be some initial friction, but it'll work itself out.
And if I can put my two cents in, the fact that they think a purely military policy should be attended to by military leadership isn't anything to shit kittens about.
Posted by: Secundus at February 14, 2010 11:05 AM (WuvMD)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 14, 2010 11:09 AM (DTffv)
Cool Facts About Dick Cheney:
Dick Cheney once forced gunpoint a doctor to administer chemotherepy. After forty-four doses and ninty minutes, he wandered off, murmuring "It's good, but I'll stick to blow and tequila."
Posted by: Cincinnatus at February 14, 2010 11:11 AM (euuyg)
It couldn't be that my math bothered you? Couldn't be that maybe, just maybe some of your 'random' surveys weren't so random?
Why the flame? Me, I don't usually bother with stupid questions posed by the anonymous. I almost didn't bother with your very angry response to a question but it was quite surprising that you're so SURE that EVERY survey you've ever answered was never known to be authored by yourself.
There are circumstances which can almost eliminate the possibility of the answers to a questionnaire NEVER being correlated with the author but I have a feeling that at least SOME of your's didn't take place under those circumstances.
Never say never, it makes you look ... stupid.
Posted by: jakee308 at February 14, 2010 11:12 AM (puYmU)
And the way the policy is set up, you can boot them only if you have PROOF they are queer. As in catching them in the midst of a homosexual act. They can go march in the local gay pride parade, and that doesn't prove a darn thing. So unless the troop is a complete shitbird or got really really stupid, it just isn't worth the hassle. In my combat tour we had enough problems just with the chicks getting knocked up and sent home; we didn't need a bunch more sex issues making things even more complicated. So count me as a "no" vote on repealing DADT.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 14, 2010 11:15 AM (DTffv)
Posted by: If I can't eat it or fuck it I piss on it at February 14, 2010 11:16 AM (lxg2b)
FYI The trolls are out in force across the blogosphere this morning.
Posted by: Cincinnatus at February 14, 2010 11:23 AM (euuyg)
If you think the sodomy lobby will stop with repealing dadt, you're a fool. They'll push for spousal benefits for partners and allowing the transgendered to cross dress and everything else the gay mafia is cramming down America's throats. BTW, I served w/ people who were "open" at different levels and didn't have a problem because they didn't wear rainbows on their sleeves which is what the gay mafia will keep pushing for.
Posted by: ccruse456 at February 14, 2010 11:24 AM (3pv79)
Well, you gotta' figure about 75% of them are from the DC metro area working in government jobs. They're snowed in. Nothing else to do but troll the conservative web sites.
Posted by: Y-not at February 14, 2010 11:26 AM (X69zM)
Posted by: Threadjacker at February 14, 2010 11:27 AM (C39a6)
As Jane said, remove the protection of the protected groups and you will remove most of the problems. I have worked with all stripes of people in the military over the last 11 years, and the problems have stemmed from lack of consequences for poor performance or discipline problems. This is true from ANY group of people. However, when there is a, real or perceived, tiered response based on demographic, moral is negatively affected. This is the only problem I have with the dissolution of DADT. The only homosexuals I have seen kicked out of the military were those who acted inappropriately, but under DADT as a pretext. However, if DADT is removed, that pretext is also removed and I am pretty sure they will join the ranks of those who are able to act (inappropriately) with near impunity.
Posted by: Lando034 at February 14, 2010 11:28 AM (MgNZB)
Posted by: If I can't eat it or fuck it I piss on it at February 14, 2010 11:39 AM (lxg2b)
90% of ratings come from the media.
Potatoe.............hahahahahah.....stupid....idiot.
Corpseman..........................move on.
IMO Bush Cheney were good. The last eight years meme is more appropriately, the shitty years since the whore liberals took the house and senate.
Posted by: kansas at February 14, 2010 11:40 AM (kG2DU)
Posted by: If I can't eat it or fuck it I piss on it at February 14, 2010 11:42 AM (lxg2b)
Posted by: curious at February 14, 2010 11:43 AM (p302b)
The Atlantic Basin is smaller than the disconnect between the Marxist-in-Chief and the uniformed services.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 14, 2010 11:48 AM (DTffv)
Posted by: Luca Brasi at February 14, 2010 11:58 AM (sHSdO)
Posted by: jakee308 at February 14, 2010 03:12 PM (puYmU)
There may have been a couple in classroom situations where an instructor may have been able to distinguish my handwriting from others but any I took that were further reaching such as unit-wide or base-wide and larger were completely anonymous. They may know who the surveys were sent to but they don't know who answered them. And yes, I am aware they can put things on individual surveys that will tell them who that particular survey was sent to.
I wasn't angry, I just thought it was a stupid question, further diminished by the bridge for sale.
Posted by: Bill R. at February 14, 2010 12:01 PM (EhlQq)
Posted by: Bitsko at February 14, 2010 12:47 PM (8/KZN)
Posted by: GarandFan at February 14, 2010 01:14 PM (IpRh/)
Posted by: allswell at February 14, 2010 02:21 PM (uTkZD)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 14, 2010 04:18 PM (PQY7w)
Posted by: Corncob Supporter at February 14, 2010 04:19 PM (ktYjH)
Posted by: di butler, sexual opportunist at February 14, 2010 07:24 PM (S3xX1)
But, i'm not in the military, and it's up to them. too often people confuse don't ask don't tell to mean "no gays allowed." that's not at all what it is, it's DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL. And it's analogous to any number of other policies which aim to suppress "individuality" while serving in favor of cohesion, teamwork, etc..
That said, Cheney has always been a guy who speaks his mind and is not afraid to take (and articulately express) unpopular positions and I respect him greatly for it. I think one of the Bush administration's greatest mistakes was not allowing him more open reign to publicly defend and explain policies. Had he been allowed to be more out there and open (or simply had pushed for it, I suspect his deep sense of loyalty and honor prevented him from doing so as well) I feel he never would have been undeservedly made into this bogeyman to the left.
Posted by: LikeATimeBomb at February 14, 2010 09:35 PM (d50Il)
Posted by: liberal loon at February 15, 2010 12:41 AM (cUrR0)
My main objection to ending DADT is that we really have more important things to worry about. Like winning wars, and stuff.
Why not push for open gays in the NFL or NBA? Use that as your social science lab. Let's see how an NBA team would respond to an openly gay player.
The Obumbles administration shows their priorities - Iraq, get out as soon as humanly possible; Afghanistan, dick around for months before making a decision; changing DADT, forge ahead boldly. They make the leadership of Chrysler and GM look innovative, decisive, and competent.
Posted by: Penultimatum at February 15, 2010 07:15 AM (98agg)
____________________
Let's War Against Diabetes
Posted by: NTDiabetes at December 13, 2010 10:31 PM (C24u9)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.272 seconds, 230 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: loppyd at February 14, 2010 09:00 AM (pGELo)