May 25, 2010
— Ace The "NY/NJ region," they say, but that means the Meadowlands, which is in NJ.
Chris Christie had nothing at all to do with this but it was DrewM.'s funny idea for a headline.
Oh: This is strange. The Super Bowl is always played at a warm-weather city or in a domed city. I can't think of any that weren't.
I knew the Giants/Jets had a new stadium being built; based on their getting the Superbowl, I assumed it was a dome, or retractable dome.
But...
The Giants and Jets, which were part of the bid along with the New Meadowlands Stadium Co., beat out Tampa, Fla., and South Florida despite concerns about cold weather—the game is played in early February, according to the NFL's current schedule.The three bidders each made 15-minute presentations to the 32 NFL owners at the Omni Mandalay in Irving, outside of Dallas. The South Florida delegation was eliminated in the first round of voting.
"New York and New Jersey can handle anything that comes our way in terms of logistics, transportation and security. And the weather is not an issue. The weather would make the game even more interesting and more exciting," Giants' treasurer Jonathan Tisch, who was co-chairman of the bid committee, told reporters after making a presentation. "We are supremely confident that Super Bowl 2014 would be an amazing event and would get recognition around the world."
So they're giving up on that rule?
Maybe Chris Christie did scare them.
Answer: Allah found an article stating this was a "one-time exception" to the Warm City Or Dome Rule.
Allah speculates that if the weather is either not an issue or adds to the game, it could open up other cold-weather cities for the Super Bowl... until the game gets ruined for these reasons, at which point the rule will be reinstated and never violated again.
Personally, I think it's a bad idea. It's contrary to tradition. Cold-weather cities are just too damn brutal in February.
Posted by: Ace at
01:08 PM
| Comments (61)
Post contains 358 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: joncelli at May 25, 2010 01:11 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Editor at May 25, 2010 01:12 PM (pUfK9)
Posted by: dagnymc at May 25, 2010 01:14 PM (2GXiu)
Posted by: joncelli at May 25, 2010 01:15 PM (RD7QR)
Eat it libs! Fatso 2012!
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 25, 2010 01:16 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: ParisParamus at May 25, 2010 01:16 PM (GgR+e)
Posted by: The Q at May 25, 2010 01:20 PM (pfStM)
Posted by: hueydiamondpooty at May 25, 2010 01:20 PM (gpwkk)
Will then-President Christie be allowed to punt the first ball?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 25, 2010 01:20 PM (B+qrE)
dagwood, by 2014, it will be like the Star Trek episode and the teams will be the Yangs vs the Coms.
Posted by: Race Bannon at May 25, 2010 01:21 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: Pecos Bill at May 25, 2010 01:22 PM (8WOM0)
Posted by: huerfano at May 25, 2010 01:23 PM (Updet)
dagwood, by 2014, it will be like the Star Trek episode and the teams will be the Yangs vs the Coms.
Posted by: Race Bannon at May 25, 2010 05:21 PM (uFokq)
Straight
Posted by: baldilocks at May 25, 2010 01:23 PM (fYmW5)
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2010 01:23 PM (6taRI)
Posted by: exceller at May 25, 2010 01:26 PM (jx2Td)
No, but that doesn't mean the end of the Superbowl. Just that all following Superbowls will be played at Dallas Stadium.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 25, 2010 01:26 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at May 25, 2010 01:28 PM (6ZPfw)
Or put us to sleep
Posted by: Y-not at May 25, 2010 01:31 PM (Kn9r7)
Only if they have sufficiently swank strip clubs for the high-rollers (this is why Indy was denied for years). NYC yes, Lambeau hell no.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at May 25, 2010 01:34 PM (mR7mk)
Posted by: mpfs at May 25, 2010 01:38 PM (iYbLN)
3 So, this means Seattle is eligible for a Super Bowl. Bring. It. On!
No, you actually have to have a fucking football team in order to be eligible to host the Super Bowl.
Posted by: Sharkman, writing from Seattle at May 25, 2010 01:39 PM (Zj8fM)
Posted by: mpfs at May 25, 2010 01:40 PM (iYbLN)
Yeah, he has extras. But they are too large to be regulation.
Posted by: pep at May 25, 2010 01:42 PM (0K3p3)
Posted by: bound4er at May 25, 2010 01:43 PM (RjUC6)
Posted by: mpfs at May 25, 2010 05:40 PM (iYbLN)
Chris Christie Snuggies!
Posted by: robtr at May 25, 2010 01:47 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: davidt at May 25, 2010 01:54 PM (HtIec)
Posted by: stuiec at May 25, 2010 02:01 PM (7AOgy)
It's more that cold-weather teams have too much of an advantage in February in cold-weather cities.
Posted by: FUBAR at May 25, 2010 02:02 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: KRKahn at May 25, 2010 02:02 PM (DDl1v)
Posted by: marine43 at May 25, 2010 02:06 PM (DsBAA)
I agree. Football needs to be played outside, in the elements, no matter what those elements are.
The coldest I've ever been was also at a football game. My dad had season tickets (20th row, 30 yard line field box) for the St. Louis Cardinals (not because he was a fan of the team per say, but because he liked watching the other teams beat up Jim Hart and Neil Lomax). I went to a game with him, and the temp on the field was close to 0. I can't remember what year it was- I was maybe 12 or 13.
Going to games like that with my dad helped me to develop my love of football... that, and the tickets to the Cards/Cowboys Monday Night game for my 16th birthday! What more could a girl want for her Sweet 16? :-)
Posted by: BethW at May 25, 2010 02:06 PM (gcRbW)
Posted by: Jean at May 25, 2010 02:06 PM (CPefM)
Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow!
This is f'n great. Weather has always played a part in football, it's what seperates it from everything else. We play, no matter what the weather. Think of the Ice Bowl (Dallas vs. Green Bay) in Lambaeu Field. Minus 20° and bitter wind. So cold that facemasks were breaking. So cold that cuts didn't bleed because the wound froze closed. Or the Mud Bowl (Miami vs. the Jets) in Miami. Torrential downpours the week before softened the field and shut down the Jet's running game. The Patriots using a snowplow to clear the field for their kicker(cheating bastards) etc.
Open up all stadiums to Super Bowl competition. A Green Bay or Chicago SB would be fun as hell.
Posted by: Don Carne at May 25, 2010 02:19 PM (wSNS7)
Posted by: Alex at May 25, 2010 02:24 PM (o0C2G)
Posted by: fartbubble at May 25, 2010 02:41 PM (gAmQ1)
The pussification of the Super Bowl is among America's most egregious mistakes. You know why Al Qaeda thought we would fold like a wet blanket if they knocked down the Twin Towers? Because our most important cold-weather sporting event, the biggest, shiniest piece of American culture we broadast to the world, is played either in a fucking air-conditioned bubble or in comfortable maybe-a-sweater-vest weather.
Fuck that.
The gridiron is where we celebrate courage and strength and savagery and trickery. This is a game where most of the rules are in place because there were too many deaths in the early days of the sport. This is war for sport.
We play football in the ice and snow because that's how Washington marched through Valley Forge -- and his army did it without shoes or timeouts. It's a disgrace to their memory to say we can't sit in the cold for a few hours with seatwarmers and Gore-Tex. If we can't hold the Super Bowl outdoors then civilization has already collapsed.
Posted by: TallDave at May 25, 2010 02:45 PM (+3aaV)
Posted by: NJConservative at May 25, 2010 02:59 PM (LH6ir)
Just keep Algore away from the game
Posted by: kbdabear at May 25, 2010 03:01 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: NJConservative at May 25, 2010 06:59 PM (LH6ir)
C'mon Ace, update the thread!
Posted by: Soon to be Ex-ExZonie at May 25, 2010 03:02 PM (as47X)
Posted by: CHRIS CHRISTIE, DAMMIT at May 25, 2010 03:08 PM (Nnplv)
Football is a cold weather game, and should never be played within 1000 miles of a palm tree. Certainly not anywhere near California. Outdoors, in a raging blizzard, with steaming heads. Fans can warm themselves like all real football fans do-with alcohol and bloodlust. The only drawback is that cheerleaders have to wear parkas, but so what?
Posted by: Landru at May 25, 2010 03:54 PM (GHpB7)
Posted by: frito p., esq at May 25, 2010 03:55 PM (crDIp)
Posted by: frito p., esq at May 25, 2010 03:57 PM (crDIp)
Posted by: Ace's liver at May 25, 2010 04:07 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: Luca Brasi at May 25, 2010 07:18 PM (opI6h)
Posted by: WSMS at May 25, 2010 09:47 PM (TATbF)
Austin to get the disaster that is F1!
Because it's so wierd and progressive to love Jacques Culotte in his screaming Ren-waaah.
Posted by: LC LaWedgie at May 26, 2010 02:16 AM (9XOWS)
Posted by: A. Gore at May 26, 2010 03:57 AM (MbMSS)
Posted by: iloveinwatch.com at May 27, 2010 12:34 AM (iaf+O)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2906 seconds, 189 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: elspeth at May 25, 2010 01:09 PM (AOIJi)