January 19, 2010
— Ace I have never heard of this site in my life, and the contributor is, of course, "Anonymous."
I don't really want to even post this.
However, since it is apparently now in the internet stream, I'll mention it, and also offer my extremely strong doubts that these guys have gotten wind of exit polls before, say, the very well-connected Jim Geraghty or other guys at NRO.
Suspicions Confirmed: I asked the tipster on this what confidence he had in it, and he said little, he was just tossing me everything.
Allah also piped up -- John Fund says no exit polls at all (wondered strongly about that-- this isn't a presidential election, after all), and this site claimed a few days ago that Lieberman would endorse Brown, which he didn't.
So, not reliable at all. Just take this as debunking post for your own benefit.
Posted by: Ace at
09:17 AM
| Comments (461)
Post contains 169 words, total size 1 kb.
Remember 2004.
GOTV and vote yourself if you're in MA.
Otherwise, stay calm.
Posted by: someone at January 19, 2010 01:18 PM (njJQD)
The Dems really are good at these last minute dirty tricks...
Posted by: Robert Byrd at January 19, 2010 09:19 AM (7BU4a)
Meanwhile Brown recovers his lead lost this AM on Intrade.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 09:20 AM (kEBiX)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 09:21 AM (kEBiX)
Posted by: wankette at January 19, 2010 09:21 AM (I1Q0P)
I can't wait to see gibbs condescend today. JOY JOY!
Posted by: Mjim at January 19, 2010 09:21 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: phreshone at January 19, 2010 09:22 AM (1AnxB)
Posted by: DocJ at January 19, 2010 09:23 AM (dt6br)
Posted by: Chris R at January 19, 2010 09:24 AM (AO4qz)
More on the Obama Effect from Mark Steyn: Mark Steyn, briefly, on the special election.
Posted by: andycanuck at January 19, 2010 09:25 AM (2qU2d)
Posted by: Rick Moore at January 19, 2010 09:27 AM (QtA8s)
Posted by: Chris R at January 19, 2010 01:24 PM (AO4qz)
Also, there was snow in the morning, meaning even fewer working stiffs voting in the morning.
Could we see the spectacle of conservatives demanding the polls stay open late?
Posted by: 18-1 at January 19, 2010 09:27 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: jjshaka at January 19, 2010 09:29 AM (i1JtJ)
Read more SFGate.com: http://tinyurl.com/ybaylsm Yes Nancy, you just keep on f'n that chicken. The rest of your (D) co-conspirators might not think so.
Posted by: Max Entropy at January 19, 2010 09:30 AM (uuZjB)
That's a bad thing, makes it easier for the Dems to pull their shenanigans.
Posted by: GregInSeattle at January 19, 2010 09:32 AM (B5cM9)
Posted by: Methos at January 19, 2010 09:32 AM (Xsi7M)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 09:33 AM (kEBiX)
Posted by: voice of reason at January 19, 2010 09:33 AM (ZMzzH)
Even beyond today, I'm speechless that the WH and Democratic leaders have already gone on record as indicating that they don't give a crap about the will of the people. Their only concern now seems to be how they can cheat their way into this horrific health care bill.
It's almost as if these D's that are "retiring" after their current terms have been bought off to ensure their votes before being replaced so that the threat of stiff competition doesn't factor into how they will ultimately vote on the bill.
This administration is scary, scary, scary.
Posted by: TheRedDianthus at January 19, 2010 09:34 AM (ErOeR)
From the article -
"And in private conversations, Hill sources say White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel has blamed Coakley, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Democratic pollster Celinda Lake for failing to see BrownÂ’s surge in time to stop it. get the ballot stuffing apparatus in place."
Fixed.
Posted by: kallisto at January 19, 2010 09:34 AM (+FkcS)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 09:35 AM (kEBiX)
Posted by: Cheney's Power Mane at January 19, 2010 09:35 AM (qcgPU)
It shall be a base of chocolate with a praline dusting, to complement the sweet victory.
Posted by: Nip Dip at January 19, 2010 09:37 AM (0aQsc)
In other words, this tip is from someone whose research consisted of skimming the lowballing estimates from the relative-Eeyores at the top of dagny's chart.
Hai! Kennedi wil com in 2nd & i wnt cheezburger. Can I haz hat-tip?
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 09:37 AM (9Sbz+)
the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Democratic pollster Celinda Lake for failing to see BrownÂ’s surge in time to stop it. get the ballot stuffing apparatus in place."
Being done now. Watch this clip of a Dem operative handing out absentee ballots today, when absentee ballots were due by last Friday
Posted by: kbdabear at January 19, 2010 09:40 AM (7FgWm)
I'm planning on BACON COVER BACON, Valu-Rite and Miller Lite to celebrate.
Then I'm going for a Dip.
Posted by: gus at January 19, 2010 09:40 AM (Vqruj)
Posted by: torabora at January 19, 2010 09:40 AM (b6/rx)
Posted by: Peaches at January 19, 2010 09:41 AM (9Wv2j)
But if the counting takes too long, "1 light beer" Ace may be too drunk and miss the dipping container.
Posted by: someone at January 19, 2010 09:42 AM (njJQD)
Posted by: Peaches at January 19, 2010 09:42 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: CBS News Poll at January 19, 2010 09:43 AM (GvSpB)
Keep crying, babies. More tears for us to drink up.
Posted by: Shooter McGavin at January 19, 2010 09:45 AM (cxGtL)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 19, 2010 09:46 AM (hoowK)
Posted by: Rightwingdeathbeast at January 19, 2010 09:47 AM (cq8CW)
Posted by: PAgirlinNC at January 19, 2010 09:47 AM (dWzy6)
Posted by: Mjim at January 19, 2010 09:47 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 19, 2010 09:47 AM (bN5ZU)
Just got a call to be a poll watcher while they count the ballots in a town near my office.
Of course I said yes, but it might be too late for me to get into Boston after.
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 09:49 AM (tG+m6)
I'd delay too, buddy.
Posted by: Who Knows at January 19, 2010 09:49 AM (0aQsc)
Posted by: Mjim at January 19, 2010 09:50 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: EC at January 19, 2010 09:50 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Jean at January 19, 2010 09:50 AM (7K04W)
Of course I said yes, but it might be too late for me to get into Boston after.
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 01:49 PM (tG+m6)
Waaaahhhhh! I wanted you to go to Boston and allow us to vicariously enjoy it with you. That is teh suck.
Posted by: Peaches at January 19, 2010 09:51 AM (9Wv2j)
ace:
don't trust that site. I got burned a few days ago over them saying Joementum was going to endorse Brown.
Posted by: eddiebear at January 19, 2010 09:51 AM (wnU1W)
Posted by: unknown jane at January 19, 2010 09:51 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Jean at January 19, 2010 09:51 AM (7K04W)
Posted by: Rightwingdeathbeast at January 19, 2010 09:52 AM (cq8CW)
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 19, 2010 09:52 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 09:54 AM (cG9YA)
The good thing is that with nothing else to count, the Election Commission should be able to get final numbers quickly. Enough should be in by 10 PM to get a good idea of the result, and if Brown is up by more than 7, enough for networks to call it.
Posted by: Chris R at January 19, 2010 09:54 AM (AO4qz)
Posted by: Iskandar at January 19, 2010 09:54 AM (doEqS)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at January 19, 2010 09:54 AM (ehLtp)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 09:54 AM (kEBiX)
Posted by: Cardinal Richulyou at January 19, 2010 09:54 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 09:55 AM (cG9YA)
Remember John Kerry's exit polls in the presidential election - ha, ha, ha
Posted by: tank at January 19, 2010 09:55 AM (CW29u)
Being done now. Watch this clip of a Dem operative handing out absentee ballots today, when absentee ballots were due by last Friday
Posted by: kbdabear at January 19, 2010 01:40 PM (7FgWm)
Chance of those being accepted 'due to real bad weather, voters couldn't mail out absentees in time'?
Which MA office to invetigate fraud?
Posted by: always right at January 19, 2010 09:56 AM (7GfKM)
Posted by: Monty at January 19, 2010 09:57 AM (4Pleu)
I don't think the lack of exit polling hurts Brown, or helps the Democrats cheat their way to victory.
In fact, since exit polling is much more liable to be faked or manipulated than the actual vote count (partisan conducted/partisan controlled exit polling with no control over who gets polled, or who counts those results), it seems to me that a fraudulent exit poll "showing" a Coakley victory (vs. an actual election result showing Brown won) would be a necessary step in order to frame the race for stealing.
That is to say, it's far easier for the Democrats to pull stuff out of their collective asses (and votes out of car trunks, found "lost" ballot boxes, "incorrectly" disqualified Democrat votes, and the like) if it's "justified" by a "result" which can distract from the actual result: they lost.
This assumes they're going to lose for real, of course.
Posted by: E(e)van3457 at January 19, 2010 09:57 AM (PB6y1)
dagny: 2
Jay in ames: 2
Zimriel: 2
Xoxotl: 2.5
Rawmuse: 3
Lincolntf: 3
Burn the witch: 4
Bat chain : 4
Truman North: 4
DSCC: brown +4
Mallamut: 4.3
Jcjimi: 4.5
Sassypants: 5
Dang Straits: 5
Joy to the: 5
Big Fat Meanie: 5
Joncelli: 5
Intrepid: 5
Johnny I: 5.5
Andy: 6
Guy Fawks: 6
Me (rdbrewer): Brown by 6
Backwardsboy: 6
Doc J: 6
Blue Hen: 6
Naturalfake 6.5
Abdominal: 7
Cheney's Power Mane: 7
Ford: 7
enoxo: 7
Country Squire: 7
Who Knows: 7
Outlaw: 7
Tipping Point: 7.5
LikeATimeBomb: By 8
arhooley: 8
Never give up: 8
Someone out there: 8
Aerofanatic: 8
SiM: Brown, 9
PAgirlinNC: 9
Hatchet five: 9.4
AJ Mama:10
Amishdude: 12
Miss Factcheck: 13
Vic: 10
Libertarian Jim: 11
Winston Smith 11
Kemp: 11
Bill Mitchell: 12
Jean: 12
Methos: 13
Vet Missing Parts: 20
Mr. Pink: Coakley 4
Reality check : Coakley 4
An Independent Voter: Coakley 3
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 09:58 AM (cG9YA)
Posted by: Rightwingdeathbeast at January 19, 2010 09:58 AM (cq8CW)
stop gloating, jerks.
you'll jinx it for us.
(and since there's about 2 million corrupt MA Dems already trying to do it for us, we don't need their help.)
frankly, i'll be shocked if he pulls it off - by which I mean survives the ballot-stuffing and the crooked recounts which are sure to follow.
however, I do intend to drink myself silly tonight if he wins the "technical," (by which I mean, "real") vote.
Posted by: jdub at January 19, 2010 09:59 AM (t9pKb)
GreginSeattle, that vid is most excellent. Are those SEIU goons? I especially enjoyed the obligatory "Nazi" thrown in for good measure. Klassy.
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 19, 2010 09:59 AM (UOM48)
HATE GLOBE WITH HEAT OF 1000 BURNING SUNS.
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 19, 2010 01:47 PM (bN5ZU)
Dagny posted a link to that in a prior thread. It first showed 50% of precincts reporting with Marcia at 50%, Brown at 49%, and Kennedy at 1%. It has since been changed to reflect 0% of precincts reporting. I think they were trying to pull a fast one. Normally there is no reporting until the polls close.
Posted by: Bill R. at January 19, 2010 09:59 AM (EhlQq)
Waaaahhhhh! I wanted you to go to Boston and allow us to vicariously enjoy it with you. That is teh suck.
Posted by: Peaches at January 19, 2010 01:51 PM (9Wv2j)
I may still head in after. I have no way of updating anyone, though. Sent my iphone savings to Scott Brown.
I'll try to hook up with Ace and Drew if I do go in, though.
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 09:59 AM (tG+m6)
Posted by: GregInSeattle at January 19, 2010 10:00 AM (B5cM9)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 10:00 AM (YCvqc)
Posted by: Rightwingdeathbeast at January 19, 2010 10:02 AM (cq8CW)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 19, 2010 10:02 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Barry Obama at January 19, 2010 10:02 AM (Pq3ay)
Posted by: GregInSeattle at January 19, 2010 10:02 AM (B5cM9)
Posted by: GregInSeattle at January 19, 2010 10:03 AM (B5cM9)
OT
While we're waiting for substantial election news......the Lanz Bulldog was just about the coolest tractor ever built. Single cylinder 500 cubic inch 2-stroke hand crank hot bulb engine. Just effing awesome.
Posted by: maddogg at January 19, 2010 10:04 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Keith Olbermann at January 19, 2010 10:04 AM (C39a6)
margin of fraud = 4.8%, per someone I don't recall. i think based on the absentee irregularities.
so, he has to beat her by 4.9% just to clear the technical hurdle. figure that the recount gets em another 2-3% and you're looking at a required margin of victory of, conservatively, 8%, to break even.
not gonna happen, folks.
Posted by: jdub at January 19, 2010 10:05 AM (t9pKb)
Posted by: Twinks at January 19, 2010 10:06 AM (LeFbD)
Could you please verify if all polls will be closed by 8:00 pm EST?
Posted by: I Botros at January 19, 2010 10:06 AM (5YeqW)
Dammit, morons. Don't jinx this thing! And Rush is making me nervous with his giddy behavior today.
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 19, 2010 10:06 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: lincolntf at January 19, 2010 10:06 AM (Ab8Sw)
Posted by: Jewells at January 19, 2010 10:07 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: runningrn at January 19, 2010 10:07 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 02:00 PM (YCvqc)
Nam!
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 10:07 AM (tG+m6)
Posted by: Derak at January 19, 2010 10:08 AM (sPWq2)
I am ready to Unleash the Snoopy (dance) when we get the word tonightÂ….
GOTV!!! Go Massachusetts!! Go Brown!! woot!
Scott Brown – Get this Party Started
Posted by: ginaswo/mim at January 19, 2010 10:08 AM (G11C+)
Actually, it started as rdbrewer's poll. I just starting compiling it to move it to the next thread, and the next, and the next (I've not gotten a lot of work done today but knew that ahead of time). Let's go with close on either the + or - side.
Rasmussen has stepped up and will pay for his own exit poll because the drive-by media didn't do it or don't want to know what happened to Marxism in Mass.
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 10:08 AM (cG9YA)
Posted by: Rightwingdeathbeast at January 19, 2010 10:08 AM (cq8CW)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 10:08 AM (kEBiX)
Posted by: Shooter McGavin at January 19, 2010 10:09 AM (cxGtL)
Not to repeat myself but.
Me and Martha McCallum on the couch, Martha wearing a very very very soft cashmere sweater. Me wearing a grin.
Posted by: gus at January 19, 2010 10:09 AM (Vqruj)
Heh! Coakley couldn't fill a middle school gym yesterday (3/4 empty) and John Kerry couldn't fill a street (only 150 people). Over 1000 people showed up on a nearby street 2 hours later for Brown. (From Rush)
Posted by: runningrn at January 19, 2010 10:10 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 19, 2010 10:10 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: 18-1 at January 19, 2010 10:10 AM (7BU4a)
Jewells--fast fingers, wow!
Happen to be sitting at my desk and Rush on the radio right behind me.
So glad you are live blogging Rush with me, beat me to it.
Rarely miss Rush's show Nam, him and Levin are the best.
Posted by: Jewells at January 19, 2010 10:11 AM (l/N7H)
dagny: 2
Jay in ames: 2
Zimriel: 2
Xoxotl: 2.5
Heather Radish: 2.5
Greg in Seattle: 2.5
Rawmuse: 3
Lincolntf: 3
TexasJew: 3.6
Burn the witch: 4
Bat chain : 4
Truman North: 4
DSCC: brown +4
Peaches: 4+
Mallamut: 4.3
Jcjimi: 4.5
Sassypants: 5
18-1: 5
Dang Straits: 5
Joy to the: 5
Big Fat Meanie: 5
Joncelli: 5
Intrepid: 5
Johnny I: 5.5
Andy: 6
Sifty: 6 narrowing to 2 after fraud
Guy Fawks: 6
Me (rdbrewer): Brown by 6
Backwardsboy: 6
Doc J: 6
Blue Hen: 6
Naturalfake 6.5
Abdominal: 7
Cheney's Power Mane: 7
Ford: 7
enoxo: 7
Country Squire: 7
Who Knows: 7
Outlaw: 7
Tipping Point: 7.5
LikeATimeBomb: By 8
arhooley: 8
Never give up: 8
Someone out there: 8
Aerofanatic: 8
SiM: Brown, 9
PAgirlinNC: 9
Hatchet five: 9.4
AJ Mama:10
Amishdude: 12
Miss Factcheck: 13
Vic: 10
Libertarian Jim: 11
Winston Smith 11
Kemp: 11
Bill Mitchell: 12
Jean: 12
Methos: 13
Vet Missing Parts: 20
Mr. Pink: Coakley 4
Reality check : Coakley 4
An Independent Voter: Coakley 3
Polynikes: Coakley: 1Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 10:11 AM (cG9YA)
Posted by: DNC Volunteer at January 19, 2010 10:12 AM (W5NBA)
Taking some files home. Can't stand being here. Will report on what I see along the way.
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 10:13 AM (tG+m6)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 02:08 PM (YCvqc)
Thanks to you both! We've got a gnarly t-storm cell moving through and he's cutting in and out on my. You are my saviors!! Loving the weather, though, almost feels like I'm in the real world, lol.
Posted by: Peaches at January 19, 2010 10:14 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Eeyore at January 19, 2010 10:14 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: Jewells at January 19, 2010 10:15 AM (l/N7H)
Jan. 19 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks rose, boosted by a rally in health companies on speculation Republicans will block an industry overhaul, while Treasuries fell for the first time in three days and the dollar strengthened.
The chance of the death of Obamacare rallies the market.
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 19, 2010 10:15 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: newser at January 19, 2010 10:16 AM (OBUuM)
Posted by: Vet Missing Parts at January 19, 2010 10:17 AM (qPu42)
Posted by: DelD at January 19, 2010 10:17 AM (eWtdM)
Posted by: incognito at January 19, 2010 02:08 PM (maxwK)
Cog!! I remember you from LGFreakzone. remember me? I was your ally occasionally.
Posted by: Vergeltung at January 19, 2010 10:17 AM (jttPx)
Posted by: jeff at January 19, 2010 10:18 AM (+uoRK)
Posted by: maddogg at January 19, 2010 02:04 PM (OlN4e)
I like the expresso maker on the front end. Very Euro.
Posted by: Vashta.Nerada at January 19, 2010 10:19 AM (emMe8)
I second the "2004" comment. The exit polls then were nothing but Eeyore donkey-shit, an attempt to throw the election by getting Republican squishes in the Upper Midwest to sit it out. Nearly worked, too.
Let's not sweat the exit polls; spend the time you'd otherwise be spending on bleaching the urine out of your panties and vote.
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 10:19 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 10:20 AM (9Sbz+)
any details on when the Rass exits will be taken/released?
hell, with all the fraud we can expect, it might be the first time in history that the exits were more accurate than the official results.
Posted by: jdub at January 19, 2010 10:20 AM (t9pKb)
Posted by: Jimma Carter at January 19, 2010 10:20 AM (ZO0u/)
Posted by: Derak at January 19, 2010 10:21 AM (sPWq2)
4% voter fraud would mean over 80,000 fraudulent votes. You would need a tractor trailer to move them, I don't see it happening. 1% is the MoC.
Posted by: Eeyore at January 19, 2010 10:22 AM (LdYLm)
I'm certainly hoping you win the pool, sir!!!!
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 19, 2010 10:23 AM (n6iqK)
Posted by: Jimmy at January 19, 2010 10:23 AM (YCVBL)
Posted by: moi at January 19, 2010 10:24 AM (7FgWm)
November will be fun.
If they quadruple down on stupid as they are threatening, November could be lots of fun.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 19, 2010 10:25 AM (n6iqK)
With the unbreakable majority in the Senate, Republicans haven't been able to do shit about all their crap.
Now? You wanna see "party of no", assholes? We'll give you "party of no". Fuck you.
Posted by: libbyt at January 19, 2010 10:25 AM (g78EC)
Posted by: ErikW at January 19, 2010 10:25 AM (k0CxD)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 19, 2010 10:26 AM (hoowK)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 10:26 AM (YCvqc)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 19, 2010 10:27 AM (bejIh)
Stay on target.
Stay on target...
Gold Five!
.......came....from.....behind......AiiieeeARRRRRRRRGGHHHHHH!!!!!!
Posted by: Martha Coakly at January 19, 2010 10:27 AM (v4UYp)
Posted by: The DaVinci Choad at January 19, 2010 10:27 AM (eDvXz)
Via GatewayPundit:
UPDATE: A Democratic operative familiar the DSCCÂ’s massive get-out-the-vote operation says that outreach workers in and around Boston have been stunned by the number of Democrats and Obama supporters who are waving them off, saying theyÂ’ll vote for Scott Brown.
Posted by: Pike Place Pete at January 19, 2010 10:27 AM (qD3QA)
Wait, am I talking about Marina Coakley or Hillary?
I get them confused.
Must be the gray pantsuits and the androgynous haircuts.
Posted by: sifty at January 19, 2010 10:28 AM (npR4L)
Coakley Win!
Boston Globe already posted the final district-by-district results..
What a great victory for Obama and his plans for America!
Posted by: Kasper Hauser at January 19, 2010 10:28 AM (KeOQp)
John Carry has located his magic Cambodian hat and will go to Coakley campaign headquarters this afternoon.
"John Carry reporting for duty ma'm!"
Posted by: Fish at January 19, 2010 10:28 AM (EINdG)
Posted by: Vet Missing Parts at January 19, 2010 10:28 AM (qPu42)
105 Rush saying that Rass is going to pay for his own exit polling now.
I have serious doubts about that.
How do you set up an exit poll with so little time? It takes a lot of people, AND if he were doing this we'd have heard about it from Brown Field workers. Anyone in MA seen a pollster?
Rass would be selling it, anyone seen a ad for the results.
Rass is NOT a non profit outfit. I smell Bullshit.
Posted by: Kemp at January 19, 2010 10:28 AM (2+9Yx)
As far as I know there are no exit polls being conducted in MA.
This is probably not a legitimate source.
Posted by: This is...it doesn't matter, just read it at January 19, 2010 10:29 AM (jVldi)
Posted by: joeindc44 at January 19, 2010 10:29 AM (QxSug)
Could probably put them on a $5 thumb drive. But I have faith that Scott Brown's legal team will notice 1483% of registered voters cast ballots in precincts that use electronic voting machines.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 19, 2010 10:29 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: newser at January 19, 2010 02:16 PM (OBUuM)
OMG! Thanks so much for posting that ! Heh! Where's the Beef? Heh! Scott St. Clair (who was the reporter in the vid) use to live in my city. He is a great conservative, and use to have an editorial column in our local newser, The Kirkland Courier. (He regularly made moonbat heads spin, there were always letters to the editor the following week, complaining about his last column). He is a really smart, articulate guy, and went head to head with King County when they were setting up "Tent City" here on the Eastside which resulted in the county having to have more restrictions and regulations on these homeless encampments (which was huge, even though we couldn't stop them from setting them up). He moved about a year ago down to Olympia to go work for the Evergreen Freedom Foundation. It was cool to see him on the video. I believe he has two sons who have served in Iraq and Stan.
Posted by: runningrn at January 19, 2010 10:31 AM (CfmlF)
anyhow, I say Brown by 3-5, but i'm looking more specifically at a 5 point win
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 10:31 AM (MxqA5)
United Food and Commercial Workers.
Which means those two tough guys are probably stock boys at Stop&Shop.
Posted by: Mal at January 19, 2010 10:31 AM (Z+qzA)
Help at last!
Al, global warming, Gore has endorsed Marcia and sent some warming weather in her honor.
That should take her over the top!
Damn and we were sooo close. Damn you Al Gore!
Posted by: Kemp at January 19, 2010 10:32 AM (2+9Yx)
Jeanne Garafolo is sitting in her Hollywood bungalow, chewing on her nails and complaining about "those fucking Republican wingnuts."
I hope her cooter rots off.
Posted by: Fish at January 19, 2010 10:33 AM (EINdG)
Could probably put them on a $5 thumb drive. But I have faith that Scott Brown's legal team will notice 1483% of registered voters cast ballots in precincts that use electronic voting machines.
Heather, I'm with you. Scott is displaying prescience in calling for lawyers to volunteer for his campaign. He's smart. He knows what happened in MN and WA state's gubenatorial election in 2004. He's preparing ahead of time (something that Rossi and Coleman didn't do). Hopefully, the cheaters will not prevail.
Posted by: runningrn at January 19, 2010 10:33 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: tank at January 19, 2010 10:33 AM (CW29u)
Keyboard Militia Blog:
These photos, courtesy of Election Journal, shows numerous examples of the Martha Coakley campaign and their lack of recognition of election laws in their illegal attempt to influence voters in today's special election in Massachusetts. I am sure this would already be frontpage news and all over the networks if those signs said "Scott Brown."
Posted by: Pike Place Pete at January 19, 2010 10:34 AM (qD3QA)
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 10:34 AM (cG9YA)
Could probably put them on a $5 thumb drive. But I have faith that Scott Brown's legal team will notice 1483% of registered voters cast ballots in precincts that use electronic voting machines.
I'd point out the video of the lady handing out absentee ballots.
Posted by: Eeyore at January 19, 2010 10:34 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: Vet Missing Parts at January 19, 2010 10:34 AM (qPu42)
If Coakley loses, it's under the bus for her and Bush's fault. If she wins, it's because Barry rode in on Tingles, his magic unicorn, and saved the day.
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 19, 2010 10:34 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth (now with 100% more smugness!) at January 19, 2010 10:35 AM (wgLRl)
We should push for new laws that punish voter fraud a bit more harshly. I'm thinking the death penalty.
Posted by: Iskandar at January 19, 2010 10:36 AM (doEqS)
Posted by: Jewells at January 19, 2010 10:36 AM (l/N7H)
158 Remember: Every time a vote is cast for Brown, a hippie cries.
Someone call in the National Guard to give them a sandwich
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 10:36 AM (cG9YA)
Posted by: whatever at January 19, 2010 10:36 AM (XIXhw)
What a great victory for Obama and his plans for America!
Posted by: Kasper Hauser at January 19, 2010 02:28 PM (KeOQp)
So what the heck is that? I have to presume they stuck test data in their app and accidentally published it, because even MA Dems couldn't be dumb enough to publish the plans to steal an election in their party newspaper.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 19, 2010 10:36 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: kansas at January 19, 2010 02:32 PM (i0WE5)
that's from about 1 week ago, don't fret
I did not notice that. Went back to check. Whew! Thanks.
Posted by: kansas at January 19, 2010 10:36 AM (i0WE5)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 10:37 AM (YCvqc)
The Kos Kiddies are asking for volunteers to drive hippies and retarded old people to the polls. Yeah, I went there so you morons wouldn't have to.
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 19, 2010 10:37 AM (UOM48)
We should push for new laws that punish voter fraud a bit more harshly. I'm thinking the death penalty.
Administered by Ted Nugent with his favorite compound bow.
Posted by: ErikW at January 19, 2010 10:37 AM (k0CxD)
Posted by: Iskandar at January 19, 2010 02:36 PM (doEqS)
As long as you don't disenfranchise us.
Posted by: Metabolically Challenged Voters for Coakley at January 19, 2010 10:37 AM (7BU4a)
We should push for new laws that punish voter fraud a bit more harshly. I'm thinking the death penalty.
Posted by: Iskandar
Photo ID. But that will never happen because the Dems count on vote fraud. Jus axe Ed Schultz.
Posted by: kansas at January 19, 2010 10:38 AM (i0WE5)
Posted by: Brown HQ at January 19, 2010 10:38 AM (ehLtp)
Posted by: Jewells at January 19, 2010 10:38 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 02:34 PM (cG9YA)
yeah and at that time these polls w/ Brown up anywhere from +5 to +17
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 10:38 AM (MxqA5)
Posted by: OokOok at January 19, 2010 10:39 AM (dQdrY)
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 19, 2010 02:37 PM (UOM4
So ask for a ride, and do your best Jim Carey in Dumb and Dumber imitation.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 19, 2010 10:39 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Christopher Calandro at January 19, 2010 10:39 AM (JdbYk)
No problem, we're on it.
Posted by: Truckers Union at January 19, 2010 10:39 AM (DIYmd)
Ted Kennedy voted for Coakley. So did Tipp O'Neil.
Posted by: gus at January 19, 2010 10:39 AM (Vqruj)
likely: Brown +9
less likely: Brown +14
even less likely but still possible so get out there and fucking vote: Coakley +1
Posted by: someone at January 19, 2010 10:40 AM (njJQD)
Posted by: Christopher Calandro at January 19, 2010 10:40 AM (JdbYk)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 10:40 AM (YCvqc)
Ted Kennedy voted for Coakley. So did Tipp O'Neil.
So did, Jack, Bobby, Joe Jr, Joe Sr and the entire Dallas Cowboys.
Posted by: Eeyore at January 19, 2010 10:41 AM (LdYLm)
I didn't need one
Margin of victories aside we really need to get this voter fraud thing under control.
ppft, fuck that
Rasmussen shows Coakley 49 Brown 47
Coakley? I'd hit it
Posted by: John F. Kennedy at January 19, 2010 10:41 AM (MxqA5)
Posted by: Anonymous Drivel at January 19, 2010 10:41 AM (DIYmd)
yeah and at that time these polls w/ Brown up anywhere from +5 to +17
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 02:38 PM (MxqA5)
But Rasmussen had it 7 to 19 lower?
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 10:41 AM (cG9YA)
Kemp, read through the last 30 comments. She inadvertently posted numbers from a week ago. All straightened out now.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 19, 2010 10:42 AM (n6iqK)
Rush played a clip of Gibbsy's presser: people are mad because of Bush.
So there ya go, folks. If Brown's elected, it's because of Bushitler!
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 19, 2010 10:43 AM (UOM48)
The Coakley campaign is playing music for the liberal masses at campaign headquarters and it's Country Joe and the Fish.
Posted by: Fish at January 19, 2010 10:43 AM (EINdG)
#204
Telephone survey? Bullshit, not on election day. Trolls be gone!
177 UFCW? I know it a union, what be its name United Fucking Cleanup Workers?
United Food and Commercial Workers.
Which means those two tough guys are probably stock boys at Stop&Shop
Looks like my guess at the name is the correct one!
Posted by: Kemp at January 19, 2010 10:43 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: Kemp at January 19, 2010 10:44 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 02:41 PM (cG9YA)
I'm referring to how that Rasmussen poll that was mentioned was posted before the polls that have come out since w/ Brown up in every poll had come out
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 10:45 AM (MxqA5)
Heh, Zimriel, I was about to go on a tirade about how I justified my 2% guess with a couple of facts, but then I noticed that you posted the same figure as I.
Well played sir. You got a bite, and it's a big one. He swallowed the hook.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at January 19, 2010 10:45 AM (UEEex)
189 If Coakley loses, it's under the bus for her and Bush's fault.
That reminds me of this hilarious video from Zo, Under My Bus.
Obama puts it in gear and rolls over friends on foes alike if they get in his way.
Posted by: Pike Place Pete at January 19, 2010 10:47 AM (qD3QA)
Posted by: Zombie Ted Kennedy at January 19, 2010 10:47 AM (LdYLm)
224 Posted by: Kemp at January 19, 2010 02:40 PM
Kemp, read through the last 30 comments. She inadvertently posted numbers from a week ago. All straightened out now.
What are you talking about? The quoted raz poll or the trolls exit polls? see #222
Posted by: Kemp at January 19, 2010 10:47 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 10:47 AM (cG9YA)
Posted by: Derak at January 19, 2010 10:48 AM (sPWq2)
Looking at the Kerry rally for Crockly I figured out why Liberal Pols are so sure they are smarter than the Conservatives. I know that the crowd that was there was chanting Brainsss, Brainssss, mmmmmmBrainss. Not having one Kerry was safe, but he heard the chant and assumed the crowd was calling him Brainssss.
Another side effect of this is that when Conservative Pols run across a Zombie cluster they flee, while the Lib stays, gives a speech, wins their votes. Not having a brain anyway they are safe, and the zombies appreciate the attention and trust – explaining why the dead vote breaks so far to the left.
Posted by: Happy Gene at January 19, 2010 10:48 AM (Hcal0)
Posted by: sifty at January 19, 2010 10:49 AM (npR4L)
An exit poll is useless in MA since the districts vary so much.
For instance an exit poll in Boston will definitely show Coakley with a big lead whereas as an exit poll in Marlborough will show Brown leading.
Unless a pollster has exit polls in dozens of places and gives you an average, disregard them.
Posted by: This is...it doesn't matter, just read it at January 19, 2010 10:49 AM (jVldi)
Why wasn't she arrested? Was she in the one jurisdiction where the police union endorsed Coakley?.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 19, 2010 10:49 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Jewells at January 19, 2010 10:49 AM (l/N7H)
Where is that from?
Yes, guys its a joke, you know the post meme, anonymous.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 19, 2010 10:50 AM (DIYmd)
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 10:50 AM (cG9YA)
240 There could not possibly be anything close to an accurate count yet.
Exactly. I take Anonymous Drivel's name to heart and call BS
Posted by: Marybeth at January 19, 2010 10:51 AM (hBRoa)
242 I'd point out the video of the lady handing out absentee ballots.
Why wasn't she arrested? Was she in the one jurisdiction where the police union endorsed Coakley?.
I call bullshit on that too! Absentees had to be filed TWO weeks ago.
Posted by: Alexrod, at January 19, 2010 10:51 AM (2+9Yx)
Please don't argue with lefties who say this race was undone by Marsha's personality.
Let them believe it. And keep pushing government health care. Right through 2012.
Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at January 19, 2010 10:51 AM (2QFX4)
Posted by: David Axelrod at January 19, 2010 10:52 AM (n6iqK)
Exit polling is the most accurate of any type polling data, and that's why John Kerry, D-Masshole was elected President of the United States.
Posted by: Fish at January 19, 2010 10:52 AM (EINdG)
yeah, my eeyorism notwithstanding, i wouldn't place a whole lot of stock in exit polls in a state like MA.
even if you could quickly establish bellwether counties and poll em, (as I presume raz is doing, if he's reall exit-polling,) you can't really adjust for time of day, etc., I would think.
Posted by: jdub at January 19, 2010 10:52 AM (t9pKb)
Jim Geraghty meets someone handing out absentee ballots on the street.
(via Haute Aer)
Posted by: Iskandar at January 19, 2010 10:52 AM (doEqS)
Why wasn't she arrested? Was she in the one jurisdiction where the police union endorsed Coakley?.
"Isabel Melendez, the community activist who came close to becoming the stateÂ’s first elected Latino mayor when she ran for the Lawrence post in 2001, has announced she wonÂ’t seek the job next year.
Instead, she said she is throwing her support behind former city councilor Israel Reyes, who recently announced his intention to run for the office.
Melendez’s announcement ends speculation that the 70-year-old would make a second run for the city’s top municipal spot when Mayor Michael J. Sullivan leaves office because of term limits. For months now, Spanish-language radio stations and local newspapers have mentioned Melendez as a possible candidate.”This is the lady, is Lawrence, MA where the Police Union endorsed Coakley?
Posted by: Eeyore at January 19, 2010 10:54 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: Tami at January 19, 2010 10:54 AM (VuLos)
An accurate exit poll isn't something you just pull out of your ass on election day. Now where are the inaccurate ones my trolls are supposed to be bombarding you with? Dammit, what am I paying these clowns for?
Posted by: David Axelrod at January 19, 2010 10:54 AM (n6iqK)
drivel :childish, silly, or meaningless talk or thinking; nonsense; twaddle.
Lets all relax a little bit and get the popcorn, beer, and dippin sauce ready for tonite. Sorry to freak you out.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 19, 2010 10:54 AM (DIYmd)
An omen of more tonight and in the months until November.
As the trackss come off of Obama's T-80.
He ends up an unelectable lame duck in his first year and a half.
This relish is too sweet.
Washing it down with barley-pop.
Posted by: sifty at January 19, 2010 10:54 AM (npR4L)
John Kerry, D-Masshole
I don't think you can use that term again for a long, long time.
Posted by: someone at January 19, 2010 02:53 PM (njJQD)
That term will be reserved for those voters who supported the toad, Marcia Croakley.
Posted by: Fish at January 19, 2010 10:55 AM (EINdG)
246 228 222 Raz first exit poll has Coakley +5
Where is that from?
Yes, guys its a joke, you know the post meme, anonymous.
I don't think ANY of us are in a joking mode. Like the United Fucking Cock Workers, we're a little on edge.
Posted by: Kemp at January 19, 2010 10:55 AM (2+9Yx)
218 The elections in Iraq are more honest than ours, what a f*cking shame libtards!
I agree, that's just pathetic that we can't at least dye the fingers. I take it that all those two-weeks-dead winos whom ACORN wheels in are already so bloated and purple they get disqualified.
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 10:55 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 19, 2010 10:57 AM (DIYmd)
If Brown wins, I'll nevah make condescending remarks about the People's Republic of Massachusetts again.
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 19, 2010 10:57 AM (UOM48)
242 I'd point out the video of the lady handing out absentee ballots.
Why wasn't she arrested? Was she in the one jurisdiction where the police union endorsed Coakley?.
I call bullshit on that too! Absentees had to be filed TWO weeks ago.
Posted by: AlexrodSorry, they were in the trunk of my car. We can still count 'em though. They did in Minnesota.
Posted by: Isabel Melendez at January 19, 2010 10:57 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: Koz Kid at January 19, 2010 10:57 AM (n6iqK)
Posted by: Barack Pollbama at January 19, 2010 10:59 AM (bejIh)
Posted by: That Chicken at January 19, 2010 10:59 AM (n6iqK)
Republican Scott Brown parks his big gas guzzling truck in handicapped parking spots.
Vote Tuesday for Martha Coakley; she doesn't support Big Oil and she doesn't hate the handicapped.
Posted by: paid for by Coakley for Senate at January 19, 2010 10:59 AM (jVldi)
Hope they gave you a break from being stuck in a shrinking air bubble and got you a seat right by the big screen at the hottest fire in Hell.
Say "hi" to Mao for me. wink
Posted by: sifty at January 19, 2010 10:59 AM (npR4L)
Posted by: Jewells at January 19, 2010 02:49 PM (l/N7H)
And for that...I blame Bush.
Posted by: Some liberal at January 19, 2010 11:00 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Zombie Charlton Heston at January 19, 2010 11:00 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: AE at January 19, 2010 11:00 AM (+xtu8)
Rush is mentioning the Boston Globe calling it for Coakley 50-49. Un-fukking-believable.
Not if you think they're simply reading off the memo they got.
Posted by: jdub at January 19, 2010 11:00 AM (t9pKb)
242 I'd point out the video of the lady handing out absentee ballots.
Why wasn't she arrested? Was she in the one jurisdiction where the police union endorsed Coakley?.
Malkin:
They’ve just posted video of a woman in Lawrence, MA, carrying around blank absentee ballots in Spanish today. She explains how she’s telling people to mark Martha Coakley’s name. The woman handing out the ballots identifies herself as “Isabel Melendez” and says she has a talk show in which she promoted Coakley’s candidacy.
More on Melendez: She’s a “community activist” in Lawrence who has run for public office before.
HereÂ’s a piece from 2003 on her involvement in aggressive voter registration campaigns:
Melendez, who said her fire for community activism was fueled by her own frustrations trying to make a good life for herself in Lawrence after emigrating from Puerto Rico, has been personally registering local residents to vote for several years. Now she hopes to take that a step further with a volunteer program that will go beyond registrations. Although the plan is in its infancy, Melendez said that in a nutshell, she envisions a team of volunteers on election days combing voter lists and asking those who havenÂ’t voted to please come out.
“It will benefit the community as a whole,” she said..” Since my arrival here, I’ve noticed that the voter-participation percentage has gone down. And it ’s not just Latinos; it ’s everyone in Lawrence. I want to motivate everyone to vote.”
Posted by: Pike Place Pete at January 19, 2010 11:00 AM (qD3QA)
Posted by: Jean at January 19, 2010 11:00 AM (tJF9l)
Posted by: Kucinich Voter at January 19, 2010 11:00 AM (SqAkN)
Yeah and hanoi john the traitor captured Cambodia and he was just a boat driver. *spit*! f*cking coward!
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 11:01 AM (YCvqc)
Posted by: GregInSeattle at January 19, 2010 11:01 AM (B5cM9)
Posted by: Pike Place Pete at January 19, 2010 11:02 AM (qD3QA)
I have to go out and buy boston cream pie and some sam adams just in case we win. I'll be back in a couple of hours. Here is where our poll stands. BTW, my projection is low due to fraud expectation.
dagny: 2
Jay in ames: 2
Zimriel: 2
Xoxotl: 2.5
Heather Radish: 2.5
Greg in Seattle: 2.5
Jane Doh: 3
Rawmuse: 3
Lincolntf: 3
TexasJew: 3.6
Eddiebear: 3.8
Burn the witch: 4
Bat chain : 4
Truman North: 4
Dr. Spank: 4
DSCC: brown +4
Peaches: 4+
Mallamut: 4.3
Jeff: 4.4
Jcjimi: 4.5
Sassypants: 5
18-1: 5
Dang Straits: 5
Joy to the: 5
Big Fat Meanie: 5
Joncelli: 5
Intrepid: 5
YRM: 5
Balrog: 5
Johnny I: 5.5
Andy: 6
Sifty: 6 narrowing to 2 after fraud
Guy Fawks: 6
Me (rdbrewer): Brown by 6
Backwardsboy: 6
Doc J: 6
Blue Hen: 6
Naturalfake 6.5
Abdominal: 7
Cheney's Power Mane: 7
Ford: 7
enoxo: 7
Country Squire: 7
Who Knows: 7
Outlaw: 7
Tipping Point: 7.5
Anon Coward: 7.9
LikeATimeBomb: By 8
arhooley: 8
Never give up: 8
Mega Independent: 8
Someone out there: 8
Aerofanatic: 8
SiM: Brown, 9
PAgirlinNC: 9
Bosk: 9
Hatchet five: 9.4
AJ Mama:10
Mrfixit: 10
Lopinslow: 12
Amishdude: 12
Nam Grunt: 13
Miss Factcheck: 13
Vic: 10
Libertarian Jim: 11
Winston Smith 11
Kemp: 11
Bill Mitchell: 12
Jean: 12
Methos: 13
Vet Missing Parts: 20
Mr. Pink: Coakley 4
Reality check : Coakley 4
An Independent Voter: Coakley 3
Polynikes: Coakley: 1
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 11:02 AM (cG9YA)
someone, somewhere mentioned that Haiti is its own homeland defense - i.e., that if you invade Haiti, you've got... Haiti.
Posted by: jdub at January 19, 2010 11:05 AM (t9pKb)
Yeah and now we are going to tie up Troops in that shit hole for 10 years when they should be fighting the gwot, what an asshole this faux President is!!!!
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 11:06 AM (YCvqc)
Ted's a little busy right now getting my barbed cock... you know the rest.
Posted by: Saaatan at January 19, 2010 11:06 AM (n6iqK)
Posted by: Eeyore at January 19, 2010 11:06 AM (LdYLm)
Oh-oh.
Plumline:
Posted at 01/19/2010, 12:31 PM EST Dems Take Comfort From High Turnout In BostonA Democratic operative tells me that Dems are taking a bit of comfort from the fact that turnout is higher than they expected in Boston, which obviously would be Martha CoakleyÂ’s best hope of pulling out a victory.
“We’re hitting our targets and we’re feeling pretty good,” the operative says.
That said, the operative also concedes reports are coming in of high turnout across the state in precincts outside of Boston. One key question is what turnout is looking like on the Democratic Irish Catholic South Shore, in towns like Braintree and Weymouth, Dem strongholds where Obama barely eeked out victories. Brown has aggressively targeted these voters.
The operative declined to say what turnout levels were in those towns. But if reports are coming in of uniformly good turnout, as the Dem suggested, presumably turnout is also high in those areas, which bodes well for Brown.
Also lending confort to the Brown camp, one Brown adviser tells MSNBC, is that the lines are longer outside Boston than inside it. But Dems are hoping that the higher population in Boston will, if current turnout levels hold, tip things their way.
Posted by: Pike Place Pete at January 19, 2010 11:06 AM (qD3QA)
Posted by: Jean at January 19, 2010 11:07 AM (IcVGZ)
Posted by: the psychiatrists in Berkeley at January 19, 2010 11:07 AM (9Sbz+)
Joseph Cao (money-LA) says he is likely to vote against deathcare next time around.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 19, 2010 11:07 AM (DIYmd)
Posted by: Dumbass from Koz at January 19, 2010 11:08 AM (n6iqK)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 11:10 AM (YCvqc)
Posted by: Jean at January 19, 2010 03:00 PM (tJF9l)
Good to hear, Jean. I have a friend who's a hotshot Dem lobbyist lawyer, very well connected in DC, and he told me last Friday that they're basically seeing a Brown win in this thing. I had forgotten all about it, lol!
Posted by: Peaches at January 19, 2010 11:10 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 19, 2010 11:11 AM (bejIh)
Posted by: Jewells at January 19, 2010 11:11 AM (l/N7H)
The trolls are supposed to be out already! Where in the hell are they????????
Posted by: David Axelturf at January 19, 2010 11:11 AM (n6iqK)
Posted by: Hussein at January 19, 2010 11:12 AM (bejIh)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 19, 2010 11:13 AM (DIYmd)
Stranger than Fiction, my friends.
Posted by: KelliPundit at January 19, 2010 11:13 AM (STfUS)
152 I'm about to become the second-worst President evah!
"Second-worst President evah" is MAH title and I'm not givin' it up that easy bitch!
Posted by: Bill Clinton at January 19, 2010 11:14 AM (v4UYp)
Posted by: Jean at January 19, 2010 11:15 AM (5ddCw)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 11:15 AM (kEBiX)
Hey, I read this on Ace's earlier posts. The lying sack of shit, everyone knows they don't let ewoks on trains unless there in a travel box.
How's he going type in that little box?
I'm taking the train, I'm pretty sure, and can access the internet through my phone, so there shouldn't be much downtime as far as blogging. I'll be able to blog en route.
Posted by: Kemp at January 19, 2010 11:15 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 11:16 AM (kEBiX)
I never would have thought I'd be cheering on Mass to turn our country around towards the Right! Holy Cow.
I know, who wouldda thunk it. But I'll take a victory from anywhere we can get it.
Posted by: Jewells at January 19, 2010 11:17 AM (l/N7H)
More Plumline:
Massachusetts Miscellany: Dirty-Trick Robocalls?* Dirty trick watch: A Massachusetts resident tells me he got a robocall misleadingly drawing a link between Ted Kennedy and the libertarian candidate in the race for his seat, Joe Kennedy — a call the recipient took as an effort to “confuse the elderly.”
Sam Hassan, a sales manager from Cohasset, tells me he got a robocall this afternoon connecting “Joe Kennedy with the late Kennedy,” in what sounded like an effort to hoodwink “elderly people who don’t know that Joe Kennedy, the Senator’s nephew, is not the Joe Kennedy who’s running for that seat.”
“It said that Joe Kennedy will carry on the Kennedy legacy,” Hassan says, and that “Kennedy is a name you can trust.” Hassan adds that the call said it was paid for not by the Joe Kennedy campaign but by some other group he’d never heard of, suggesting the possibility that the call is designed merely to snooker Martha Coakley voters into supporting the libertarian.
Posted by: Pike Place Pete at January 19, 2010 11:17 AM (qD3QA)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 19, 2010 11:18 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at January 19, 2010 11:18 AM (k0CxD)
Posted by: curious at January 19, 2010 03:14 PM (p302b)
morontips at gmail
Posted by: Peaches at January 19, 2010 11:18 AM (9Wv2j)
Clinton and Dubya never did this much bashing of the last guy, hell Clinton had a full blown standing ovation for Poppy Bush at his Inauguration and Dubya had a pause for applause for Clinton, when I saw Obama thank Dubya for his service and very quickly move on w/o any acknowledgment I knew he was going to be in full blame Bush mode
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 19, 2010 03:07 PM (DIYmd)
He won in New Orleans (re-elected Nagan, went to Obama w/ about 80% or so of the vote, haven't gone red since Nixon in 1972 I think), thanks to Jefferson getting caught in that scandal w/ the "cold cash", he's screwed even if he voted against it the 1st time around
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 11:19 AM (MxqA5)
Posted by: Massachusetts is purple at January 19, 2010 11:19 AM (KXLHt)
Gotta run out for stuff to make my Marine's favorite chili tonight. Plus, I need to calm my nerves.
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 19, 2010 11:20 AM (UOM48)
Relax your face, Nancy, and you'll be... oh, never mind
Posted by: The One Righteous Man in Pelosi's district at January 19, 2010 11:20 AM (n6iqK)
Posted by: Massachusetts is purple at January 19, 2010 11:20 AM (KXLHt)
Posted by: Bugler at January 19, 2010 03:07 PM (YCVBL)
That's nothing.
Posted by: Rwanda at January 19, 2010 11:21 AM (dQdrY)
-------------------------------
That is so totally, totally wrong, and I for one, will not stand for that kind of undemocratic trickery.
Posted by: BWAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA at January 19, 2010 11:21 AM (bejIh)
Posted by: Fish at January 19, 2010 03:14 PM (EINdG)
ok, and? McCain won 60% of the local radio station's poll in 2008
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 11:22 AM (MxqA5)
What makes you think that's a pickle?
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 19, 2010 11:22 AM (n6iqK)
Posted by: Intrepid at January 19, 2010 11:22 AM (92zkk)
To all the liberal media pukes who castigated and unnecessarily criticized Sarah Palin; this is pay-back bitches. You too Shepard Smith!
Posted by: Fish at January 19, 2010 11:23 AM (EINdG)
News from one of my 3 sisters in Boston:
"Have not heard much today. Of course, as late as this morning the polls are saying that Brown is ahead but I canÂ’t bank on that until I see it for myself. I have watched the local coverage on all of the channels and I think the people are fed up and I think they respect the campaign that Scott Brown has run.
We are planning to go and vote after work. It was snowing/flurrying here earlier this morning but nothing that is sticking. ItÂ’s just rain now. That could be why the city turn out has not been that great. I am hoping for a victory for Brown! This would be a major upset. I certainly plan to be glued in front of the television this evening to watch the results."
Posted by: Marybeth at January 19, 2010 11:23 AM (hBRoa)
Oh, Brown's very popular Ed. The sportos, the motorheads, geeks, sluts, bloods, wastoids, dweebies, dickheads - they all adore him. They think he's a righteous dude.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 19, 2010 11:24 AM (mR7mk)
SiM reporting:
Huge turnout on the North Shore and Northern Mass! The snow is Brown up here.
This should counter the Machine Vote of Boston and Fall River for a Brown Landslide. I delivered a total of 11 Brown voters by car. Everybody upbeat FTW!
Posted by: sickinmass but getting better at January 19, 2010 11:25 AM (Dxfei)
Posted by: curious at January 19, 2010 03:14 PM (p302b)
morontips at gmail
Posted by: Peaches at January 19, 2010 03:18 PM (9Wv2j)
Thank you, peaches
Posted by: curious at January 19, 2010 11:25 AM (p302b)
Do we know anything about the effective of the old-boy Democrat "street money"?
Dennis Miller was reporting the DNC was out at the old folks home picking them up to give them dinner and a movie and drop them off at the polls.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 19, 2010 11:25 AM (pLTLS)
Bwaney Fwank remains in the cloak room sucking on a pickle to calm his nerves.
What makes you think that's a pickle?
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 19, 2010 03:22 PM (n6iqK)
Pickle is conservative code word for cock!
Posted by: Fish at January 19, 2010 11:26 AM (EINdG)
Hell, that's fairly simple to do. Just point towards them and say "Hey, pull my finger!" - they'll pull, the inevitable will rrriiiippp forth, and in about a minute, you can do it all over again.
It helps if you consume a goodly amount of pinto beans an hour head of time, though.
Posted by: Intrepid at January 19, 2010 11:26 AM (92zkk)
'chubby lesbians for Brown'....is this a joke?
Ann Coulter was on Laura Ingraham this morning and mentioned it.
btw, Ann + Laura = me blowing a nut
Posted by: This is...it doesn't matter, just read it at January 19, 2010 11:27 AM (jVldi)
Posted by: David Axeldouche at January 19, 2010 11:28 AM (bejIh)
Yay, for Bueller quotes! Shake it up, baby. Twist and Shout!
Posted by: Jay in Ames at January 19, 2010 11:28 AM (UEEex)
Laura is pretty hot though.
Posted by: doug at January 19, 2010 11:29 AM (Sa/HV)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 11:29 AM (c459z)
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 11:30 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Assy Pelosi at January 19, 2010 11:30 AM (bejIh)
I've said it before, Anne Coulter looks like John Kerry in a blonde wig I'm a pickle smoocher.
corrected
Posted by: This is...it doesn't matter, just read it at January 19, 2010 11:31 AM (jVldi)
Posted by: doug at January 19, 2010 11:33 AM (Sa/HV)
Posted by: Peaches at January 19, 2010 11:33 AM (9Wv2j)
yeah, that makes sense
Change isn't happening fast enough so the people are gonna punish Obama and the Democrats by electing Scott Brown and thus throwing a monkey wrench in Obama's agenda.
Posted by: This is...it doesn't matter, just read it at January 19, 2010 11:33 AM (jVldi)
364 I've said it before, Anne Coulter looks like John Kerry in a blonde wig.
Oh, she's hotter than some, not as hot as others. Just like everyone else on the planet. But, imagine how good she'd be at talking dirty if she chose to.
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 11:34 AM (c459z)
Posted by: OokOok at January 19, 2010 11:35 AM (dQdrY)
I would bet a dollar to a doughnut that Ann can get blue in a minute in a bar over some great scotch and whispered conversations.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 11:36 AM (YCvqc)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 11:36 AM (c459z)
yep, curious george
here's an easy link to listen to Howie, which all of you should be doing if you want to keep your finger on the pulse of this MA election
Posted by: This is...it doesn't matter, just read it at January 19, 2010 11:37 AM (jVldi)
Oh, she's hotter than some, not as hot as others. Just like everyone else on the planet. But, imagine how good she'd be at talking dirty if she chose to.
fwoah. no kidding.
Posted by: jdub at January 19, 2010 11:38 AM (t9pKb)
Posted by: s'moron at January 19, 2010 11:38 AM (p1s9n)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 11:39 AM (c459z)
As for Ann and Laura, Ann would enjoy that, right??
At least that's what I heard.
Never heard that one, Lacey. I thought she dated Bill Maher (but that's the same thing, I guess).
Or perhaps a switch hitter?
Posted by: Jay in Ames at January 19, 2010 11:40 AM (UEEex)
And it's nobody's business what anyone does in my mind.
Posted by: sifty at January 19, 2010 11:40 AM (npR4L)
@156: "You wanna see "party of no", assholes? We'll give you "party of no"."
Now, now; don't be hasty. We have history holding on Line 2.
Posted by: The Maine Sisters at January 19, 2010 11:41 AM (cZtT3)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 11:41 AM (YCvqc)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 11:41 AM (c459z)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 11:43 AM (c459z)
Posted by: Steve McMahon, Democratic Strategist at January 19, 2010 11:44 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 19, 2010 11:44 AM (DIYmd)
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 11:44 AM (cG9YA)
Posted by: Jay in Ames at January 19, 2010 11:44 AM (UEEex)
A.C. dated Keith Olbermann????
She slammed him hard in one of her books.
Is Olby the one of small stature or small ding-a-ling? Or both?
Posted by: ErikW at January 19, 2010 11:48 AM (k0CxD)
Then Laura and Ann are dating in the same circle.
Laura also had a date w/Olbermann back in the 90s. I'm sure that night still periodically wakes her up at night.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 19, 2010 11:48 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 11:48 AM (c459z)
Posted by: Peaches at January 19, 2010 11:49 AM (9Wv2j)
NOOOOOO. No. *lalalalala* I can't hearrrrrr you.
Posted by: Derak at January 19, 2010 11:49 AM (sPWq2)
And Sarah Jessica Parker might be reading.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at January 19, 2010 11:50 AM (UEEex)
Also, ParisParamus had Brown +17, between me and Vet Missing Parts in one of the other threads but hasn't made your list.
Posted by: Methos at January 19, 2010 11:50 AM (Xsi7M)
Posted by: Derak at January 19, 2010 11:51 AM (sPWq2)
Posted by: Massachusetts is purple at January 19, 2010 11:51 AM (KXLHt)
Posted by: Methos at January 19, 2010 03:50 PM (Xsi7M) -
Me? Do something excessive? Methos, I'm hurt.
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 11:52 AM (c459z)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 19, 2010 03:44 PM (DIYmd)
Yeah, well it IS their fault. He is an idiot and that is why the dems are all considered turds of a feather...
Posted by: rightzilla at January 19, 2010 11:54 AM (rVJH4)
Plus I would hit both Ann and Laura at the same time.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 19, 2010 11:54 AM (DIYmd)
Nope. Not me.
Laura dated Olbermann? Gag me with a pitchfork!
Posted by: incognito at January 19, 2010 11:54 AM (maxwK)
From UniversalHUB.com:
Election-day shocker: City enforces 150-foot rule at Holy Name School
Around 12:30 p.m., a worker from the Boston Elections Department showed up at Holy Name School in West Roxbury to begin removing all of the Coakley and Brown signs festooning the wall and fence along West Roxbury Parkway and Centre Street.
The school, which sits on a rise, is traditionally a place where candidates position giant signs - and candidates themselves routinely position themselves right in front of the entrance to the polling station. Mayor Menino himself is a frequent voter accoster on those steps, despite a state law that bans politicking within 150 feet of the entrance to a polling place.
But not today. Even a Brown supporter expressed surprise - he said he figured some Brown person "from the suburbs" dropped a dime and filed a complaint. Even more upset was a Coakley supporter - to whom the election worker was busy handing over signs, one far larger than the supporter herself. The worker said she would either have to do something with the signs or he would just cart them away for disposal.
Posted by: Pike Place Pete at January 19, 2010 11:54 AM (qD3QA)
Hey, I won't knock our gals.
I mean, you have to look long and hard to find an unattrative female conservative pundit. On the other side, their cup runneth over in the fug department.
Let's face facts, us conservative women are teh hawt and smart. Oh and we shave and use shampoo so that's a bonus.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 19, 2010 11:54 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: ford at January 19, 2010 11:54 AM (Ki7fm)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 11:54 AM (c459z)
how has LGF covered this election? or is it just been bashing religion crap all week long?
Posted by: YRM at January 19, 2010 11:56 AM (MxqA5)
Posted by: Cincinnatus at January 19, 2010 11:57 AM (euuyg)
Hey, guys I going to get a work out in and shower up.
I know I and the other skulls have a big night ahead, so we're going to wear some Axe Body spray in honor of good old Axelrod, his bad selfs. Without that asshole's arrogance none of this would have been possible, thanks ole boy.
That shit really stinks, sort of like Axelrod his selfs.
Ready to light up tonight!
Posted by: The Skull at January 19, 2010 11:58 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: rightzilla at January 19, 2010 11:58 AM (rVJH4)
As for Ann and Laura, Ann would enjoy that, right??
At least that's what I heard.
Apparently Ann also dated Rush Limbaugh. At least I saw reference to her taking her to Missouri to meet the family over a holiday.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 19, 2010 11:59 AM (n6iqK)
Posted by: Tipsy McStagger, somewhere down in Texas at January 19, 2010 12:01 PM (9oNaP)
Oh yeah. True of Mrs. Five also.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 19, 2010 12:01 PM (n6iqK)
I am trying to work today but am having trouble concentrating wanting any, ANY I SAY, current stuff I can get on what's going on in MA today.
Posted by: TheresaD at January 19, 2010 12:01 PM (iGCmo)
Posted by: rightzilla at January 19, 2010 12:02 PM (rVJH4)
Election-day shocker: City enforces 150-foot rule at Holy Name School
Bitter, clinging Catholics! Oh the inhumanity! I blame Bush!
OK, gotta go do a Target run (we need TP!--The double ply quilted stuff). I'll be back in a while. I am on pins and needles! I've been praying for Scott Brown all day!
Posted by: runningrn at January 19, 2010 12:03 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: rightzilla at January 19, 2010 12:03 PM (rVJH4)
Boston Herald's Howie Carr. More Coakley Foot In Mouth disease:
On Sunday I called Coakley “Mike Dukakis in a skirt.” I would now like to apologize to Mike Dukakis.
Did you see this woman on Ch. 25 yesterday? Does she ever take her foot out of her mouth? She claimed she’s been running a “positive” campaign - you know, like Chuck Schumer calling Scott Brown a “teabagger.” Then she said her big problems have been “bad weather” and “the holidays” - Christmas, in other words. You should check out the whole thing. She’s not standing for the big insurance companies, even though she went down to D.C. last week to pick up some cash from them.
You want irony? Do you realize that if the state Democrats hadnÂ’t changed the Senate succession law twice in the past five years, they wouldnÂ’t be in meltdown mode this morning?
Their lame (soon-to-be) lame-duck governor could have appointed whatever stiff he wanted.
Irony? HereÂ’s another one: Steve Lynch, the congressman from Southie, was basically kicked to the curb by the unions because he wasnÂ’t gung-ho enough for their scheme to destroy health care. Maybe he couldnÂ’t have won the Democrat primary last month, but a couple of things you can say about Lynch.
Unlike Martha, he knows who Curt Schilling roots for, and he also knows that there are still terrorists in Afghanistan. Come to think of it, IÂ’ll bet he can also spell Massachusetts.
This is Martha yesterday on the voters she says are wrong: “I think they’re gonna send someone to Massachusetts who has a proven record.”
That would be you, Martha. You’ll be the one we “send” to Massachusetts. Scott Brown we’ll send to Washington.
Posted by: Pike Place Pete at January 19, 2010 12:04 PM (qD3QA)
444
Nah, he was bad mouthing Sarah during last year's election but on second thought, what the hell, same difference.
Posted by: Tipsy McStagger, somewhere down in Texas at January 19, 2010 12:04 PM (9oNaP)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 12:05 PM (YCvqc)
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) on Tuesday said that angst voters have expressed early this election year is the result of GOP obstructionism, not the Democrats agenda.
Yeah, that's what it is.
Posted by: incognito at January 19, 2010 12:06 PM (maxwK)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 04:05 PM (YCvqc)
Talk, you say.....talk is it.......
Posted by: rightzilla at January 19, 2010 12:07 PM (rVJH4)
Posted by: KelliPundit at January 19, 2010 12:08 PM (STfUS)
Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 12:08 PM (cG9YA)
Anything can happen on my boat out in the Gulf, but I would be the happiest man in the world listening to them.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 12:11 PM (YCvqc)
448 This is Martha yesterday on the voters she says are wrong: “I think they’re gonna send someone to Massachusetts who has a proven record.”That would be you, Martha. You’ll be the one we “send” to Massachusetts. Scott Brown we’ll send to Washington.
BAHAHAH
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 12:13 PM (9Sbz+)
What exactly are the laws that govern this is Massachusetts? I ask because every state is different. Here it's 100 feet. There it may be different, so these may not be as egregious as they seem.
Posted by: Steve L. at January 19, 2010 12:14 PM (Gkhxf)
434 how has LGF covered this election?
Last I saw (quoted here last night), Chucky was butthurt over the likely Brown win and so put up a skewed "discussion" thread, hoping someone would argue with his premise and give him an excuse for a banning.
I'm not going to link to that sadistic little tyrant.
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 12:16 PM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Methos at January 19, 2010 12:19 PM (Xsi7M)
Posted by: Methos at January 19, 2010 12:22 PM (Xsi7M)
@463 - None really taken Methos. Once you get to know me you'll know there are times not to take me too seriously. And I'm only half as stupid as I look so...
And Nam, you have a boat? I do love to fish you know. "Course, after the shoulder surgery the end of the month it'll be a while before I'm ready to tangle with more than a good sized bluegill.
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 12:27 PM (c459z)
Swamppolitics.com:
Posted January 19, 2010 12:50 PM
by Paul West
President Barack Obama's top political advisor, David Axelrod, said today that if the White House had been asked earlier, more could have been done for embattled Democratic Senate candidate Martha Coakley in Massachusetts.
Axelrod, in a question and answer session with reporters, said it was too soon for "post-mortems" on the special election to fill the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy's seat. And for the record, he said that he still expected Coakley to win.
But it didn't take much reading between the lines to see that the president and his team are preparing to back-pedal as swiftly as humanly possible to distance Obama from a disastrous result tonight...
Ultimately, he said, voters will have to "make a judgment" about which party and its candidates offer "the best possibility for progress for them and their families" and "is fighting for the middle class." And which party is beholden to"powerful interests"--like the insurance companies and big banks--and protecting "the status quo."
Uhhmmm, Dipwad David, haven't the voters made a judgment about your overreaching conceit and arrogance, your nonstop spending, your broken promises and outright lies, your manipulation of the truth, your holding average people in contempt, your attacking of people who don't agree with you, the outrageous things we have learned about your Czars and cozy relationship with SEIU and ACORN, the pettiness and whining of your White House, the propaganda the NEA tried to pump out, that Scott Brown is a better, more likeable candidate who has simply out-campaigned your Dede Scazafafa candidate, the unpopularity of ObamaCare, or the rising unemployment under your watch? Why you speak to that, Dipwad?
Posted by: Pike Place Pete at January 19, 2010 12:35 PM (qD3QA)
HuffPo on how Brown's campaign is kicking Coakley's ass with social media:
The (Coakley) event was held at Northeastern University and sponsored by the Student Democrats. Quick. How do college students communicate? Facebook and SMS of course! Yet these two forms of communications played absolutely no formal part in the rally. The brochure that was handed out had no web addresses or social media sites. At the rally, Coakley fans were asked to vote. They were asked to volunteer at phone banks. They were asked to talk to neighbors and friends.
But were the many college students in the crowd told to talk up the Coakley campaign on Facebook, the college student communications tool of choice? No. Were people at the rally asked to tweet? No. Were they asked to join Coakley's fan page? No.
The Coakley campaign is underestimating the importance of social media and the new rules of marketing and PR.
John McCain relied on what worked to elect George W. Bush and he lost mainly because of social media. Now Martha Coakley is relying on the playbook that elected Ted Kennedy and she may lose because of social media too.
Let's look at some numbers, from Legal Insurrection:
As of Monday morning, Republican Scott Brown has 76,538 fans on his Facebook page; Martha Coakley has 14,441 fans.
On Twitter, Brown has 10,187 followers compared to Coakley's 3,514 followers.
The total uploaded views for Brown's YouTube videos are 578,271 versus 51,173 for Coakley.
On the eve of voting in Massachusetts, CNN's Eric Kuhn notes that Republican Scott Brown's campaign has been effectively tapping into new media, and now has "dramatically more followers on social networks" than Democrat Martha Coakley.
Damn, these guys are good.
Yeah, but give them $20 apiece, and SEIU and ACORN will fill up Coakley's numbers.
Wait, isn't that astroturfing?
Posted by: Pike Place Pete at January 19, 2010 12:55 PM (qD3QA)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3544 seconds, 589 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Remember 2004.
GOTV and vote yourself if you're in MA.
Otherwise, stay calm.
Posted by: someone at January 19, 2010 09:18 AM (njJQD)