November 22, 2010
— Open Blogger The news of new TSA overreach is becoming a daily occurrence. Everywhere you turn you are bombarded with stories of TSA incompetence, harassment, and mission creep. In the past two days alone weÂ’ve seen video of a boy being strip searched, the story of a man's urostomy bag being ripped, and a grandmother having to explain to her granddaughter why the TSA is touching her no-no spots.
Enter CNN reporter Jessica Ravitz, who is magnanimous enough to let us on in a little secret. You travelers ain't exactly hot stuff either.
The poor TSA agents have had to :
chase cats through terminals, watched an escaped bird fly overhead and come face-to-face with pet monkeys and other exotic creatures. One agent, while previously working at Washington's Dulles, opened a cooler to find a live penguin.
You read that right. They had to chase cats. Those poor tortured souls. CNN would like you to keep that in mind the next time you are in line at the airport and hesitant to spread you legs so a TSA Agent can pick at your dingleberries.
To be fair the article isn't a total defense of the TSA. The writers stated goal is to give the reader the impression that the TSA see their fair share of crazy passenger antics. Including a women who tried to smuggle weed into jamaica by taping it to her body a la Midnight Express.
However, I can't shake the feeling that the main gist of this article is to defend the TSA by attacking the people complaining about violations of their privacy.
It is an attempt to do two specific things. Discredit those making the complaints and stretch the content of their complaints to paint them as extremists or incessant whiners.
This is a common tactic on the left. To take your opponents argument and take it to the extreme. You want less government? Then you're an anarchist. You don't want to raise taxes? Then you want to abolish all taxes. You think the government does a poor job running some programs? Then you must want to get rid of roads, hospitals, sewage systems, etc.
The left all too often is allowed to make our arguments for us and in doing so they take perfectly reasonable arguments, and through sophistry and artistic license, make them into extremist stereotypes.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
08:26 AM
| Comments (169)
Post contains 406 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: joncelli© at November 22, 2010 08:32 AM (RD7QR)
Oh I love this one...
[lib reasoned argument]
You want to return government to its 2008 levels?!? WHY DON'T YOU JUST MOVE TO SOMALIA YOU LIBERTARIAN EXTREMIST!!!
[/lib reasoned argument]
Posted by: 18-1 at November 22, 2010 08:32 AM (7BU4a)
Here's an odd observation: http://tinyurl.com/2c9dly3
Posted by: Keith Arnold at November 22, 2010 08:33 AM (Jdtsu)
This is probably true for that last remaining CNN viewer who is not chained to a TV in an airport terminal which is the last place CNN is actually viewed.
Posted by: Vic at November 22, 2010 08:34 AM (e4sSD)
This is a common tactic on the left. To take your opponents argument and take it to the extreme.
No kidding. If I hear the words "unfettered capitalism" one more time ...
Posted by: FireHorse at November 22, 2010 08:35 AM (sWynj)
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at November 22, 2010 08:35 AM (QxGmu)
Flyers (or perhaps, fliers)? I prefer the word "customers." Or in my case, "former customers."
Posted by: Keith Arnold at November 22, 2010 08:38 AM (Jdtsu)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at November 22, 2010 08:39 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 22, 2010 08:39 AM (Cm66w)
You assume Ben made a slang mistake. When the TSA authorizes colonoscopies, they will be picking at our dingleberries then.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 22, 2010 08:40 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 22, 2010 08:40 AM (Cm66w)
Posted by: Penfold at November 22, 2010 08:41 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: moki at November 22, 2010 08:42 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 22, 2010 08:42 AM (B7dyo)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 22, 2010 08:42 AM (eCAn3)
As for chasing a cat, I have to give mine medicine right now, so lots of chasing is going on, and trust me, it takes time. Once again, that seems like a benefit rather than a problem.
Posted by: shibumi at November 22, 2010 08:43 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: Jean at November 22, 2010 08:44 AM (xkJak)
Oh there was a young fellow named Shepherd/With a big hairy butt like a leopard/where all of the fairies/liked to pick dingleberries/and fry them up salted and peppered.
Never thought I'd be quoting Garrison Keillor on AOSHQ but that one's pretty good.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at November 22, 2010 08:44 AM (SCcgT)
Posted by: moki at November 22, 2010 08:44 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 22, 2010 08:46 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Penfold at November 22, 2010 08:46 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 08:48 AM (UOM48)
You flyer's ain't exactly hot stuff either.
Err, fliers?
sorry. I am a hockey fan, a penguins fan to be specific. So I was thinking of Flyers, like the philly flyers.
Thanks for the correction.
Posted by: Ben at November 22, 2010 08:49 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at November 22, 2010 08:49 AM (1Ialr)
Posted by: Jean at November 22, 2010 08:50 AM (lnUW/)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 22, 2010 08:50 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: moki at November 22, 2010 08:51 AM (dZmFh)
the CNN management decided to go with a piece of pro TSA fluff - to be broadcast to people who had just suffered under their tender mercies. Genius, it shows those neilsen numbers are all due to Fox's hottties.
Exactly. I've come to the conclusion that CNN and most other networks wait for a big story to gain momentum and then take the far less popular side of the argument and present it as the reasonable side.
Posted by: Ben at November 22, 2010 08:51 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 22, 2010 08:52 AM (Cm66w)
Posted by: Barbarian at November 22, 2010 08:52 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 22, 2010 08:52 AM (B7dyo)
Posted by: cali grump at November 22, 2010 08:52 AM (hL0k8)
According to the current administration and the MFM, it's ALWAYS us causing the problem.
The only "privacy" that they respect anymore is to have as many abortions as are wanted, whenever they're wanted, and for them to be free.
Otherwise? We should shut up and take it.
Posted by: Mostly Lurk at November 22, 2010 08:52 AM (y5VNb)
Posted by: RNB at November 22, 2010 08:53 AM (fe/Mk)
You're exactly right. And even the well-meaning non-snarky ones do this. I think it is because they have this idealistic view of government in their head, that it is supposed to be this free uninhibited will of the people. So in their minds, if you criticize ObamaCare, you are criticizing the very flower of government itself, which means you also want the government to stop paving roads.
It's nonsense but that is the best explanation I can come up with. I'm at a loss trying to understand these people.
Posted by: chemjeff at November 22, 2010 08:53 AM (PaSAU)
I'm still gob-smacked that TSA goons went through that woman's damned wallet.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 08:54 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: moki at November 22, 2010 08:54 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: navybrat at November 22, 2010 08:55 AM (I/Hbl)
Posted by: John Pistole at November 22, 2010 08:55 AM (GwPRU)
that's just frickin' awesome dude
Posted by: chemjeff at November 22, 2010 08:56 AM (PaSAU)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 08:56 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Caiwyn at November 22, 2010 08:58 AM (ttktr)
This article had almost nothing to do with whether TSA scan-or-grope is effective or justifiable. It was an attempt at showing how today's airline passengers look to the people on the other side of the counter (not just TSA, but airline personnel and airport staff, too). And some passengers are beasts. It says something about the readership of this blog that some of them see a left-wing plot in this.
You're right to a point. This article is about how bad some passangers are, but it's over all goal is to show paint the passangers as the bad people.
I am not saying this is a left wing plot to sap or impurify our bodily fluids, but rather an consistent method used to paint people who legitimate complaints, often from the right, as nuts.
Are there a ton of assholes flying? Yes, of course. But this issue at hand is does the TSA or government have the right to be as invasive with their search techniques as they are. It's isn't a quesiton of whether the TSA is good or passengers or bad, but that is exactly what this article is trying to make it.
It's saying, passengers are buttholes and terrible people, so whatever the government needs to do is justified.
It's trying to change the frame of the debate from, are searches violating any semblance of privacy, to a debate on the nature and behavior of people who fly.
Posted by: Ben at November 22, 2010 08:59 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: john ryan at November 22, 2010 09:00 AM (0YS61)
Posted by: maddogg at November 22, 2010 12:52 PM (OlN4e)
Dude, next time a disclaimer would be nice.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 22, 2010 09:00 AM (9hSKh)
Why would you need to smuggle weed into Jamaica?
That's like taking a hooker to Las Vegas.
Posted by: Paladin at November 22, 2010 09:00 AM (LTquJ)
Posted by: Doc at November 22, 2010 09:00 AM (AG6vT)
Posted by: maddogg at November 22, 2010 09:02 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 22, 2010 09:02 AM (eCAn3)
wow that last comment was filled with typing errors. sorry typing to fast and trying to do too many things at once.
My point is the whole reason this article was written was to try to change the debate from being about privacy to being about the passengers and their character.
I understand the TSA needs to inspect passengers. I understand there are passenger's who treat the TSA like crap, but the big debate going on in America right now is about the rigidity of government inspection policy at the airport and more specifically how far is too far.
Posted by: Ben at November 22, 2010 09:02 AM (wuv1c)
archie
exactly....islam is the enemy...profiling is necessary..keep the tsa's hands off our kids, handicapped, elderly, non muslim religious...
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 22, 2010 09:03 AM (Cm66w)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 22, 2010 12:46 PM
Never took a kitteh on a flight, but a few of mine would have gone thermonuclear on any TSA asshole who wanted to do any more than look at them (from a distance).
The lib attitude that we should suffer inordinately for the Common Good needs to be banished along with incompetent jerks like Nappy and her boss in the White House.
If Dubya had had the balls to show the Muzzies exactly what we think of goons who fly aircraft into our buildings and kill our people, we wouldn't be in this mess.
I'm getting sick of hearing about this. Even Fucks News, while presenting plenty of outrageous outrage, seems to be tilting toward the "hey, we gotta live with it" attitude in its endless coverage.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at November 22, 2010 09:03 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: joeindc44 at November 22, 2010 09:04 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 22, 2010 09:06 AM (PaSAU)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 09:06 AM (UOM48)
#33, Jean, if you need a couple barn cats and are within a long day's drive of Nashville, I will deliver two to four of them over Thanksgiving weekend. No shit.
With my wife's illness and me being gone all the time for work, we're having a Feline Inventory Reduction.
Shoot me a note, e-mail in URL field.
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 22, 2010 09:07 AM (QUuUE)
Posted by: maddogg at November 22, 2010 09:08 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: waiting at November 22, 2010 09:08 AM (rf5Sl)
Posted by: booger at November 22, 2010 09:09 AM (9RFH1)
also check out the headlines section on the right side of the main page of this blog.
rdbrewer and andy have been updating TSA stories non stop.
Posted by: Ben at November 22, 2010 09:10 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Socratease at November 22, 2010 09:10 AM (Cw79V)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at November 22, 2010 09:12 AM (SB0V2)
What's this?
There is a rumor floating around that Peloosi will step down as minority leader in January.
Anyone else hear about this wacky plan of hers?
Posted by: microsoothsayer at November 22, 2010 09:12 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Bret Farve at November 22, 2010 09:12 AM (0GFWk)
However, I can't shake the feeling that the main gist of this article is to defend the TSA by attacking the people complaining about violations of their privacy.
Zackly. Matt Lauer led off the today show with an "interview" of the pr*ck who runs TSA, during which "interview" Lauer made it clear that passengers complaining are a tiny minority endangering the rest of America and making life hard for valiant TSA agents who are strip searching the airports "to keep us safe." It was nauseating.
Posted by: Louis Tully at November 22, 2010 09:12 AM (K/USr)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at November 22, 2010 09:12 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 12:56 PM (UOM4
Or Cankles Clinton
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 22, 2010 09:13 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at November 22, 2010 09:14 AM (PLvLS)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 09:14 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: cali grump at November 22, 2010 09:14 AM (hL0k8)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 01:14 PM (UOM4
I'd show you mine, but photobucket took the picture down. Something about it being inappropriate.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 22, 2010 09:16 AM (eCAn3)
I'll be helping the economy, visiting the nation, meeting people, and giving Obama and the TSA a big FUCK YOU.
Posted by: tangonine at November 22, 2010 09:16 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Texas A&M football player at November 22, 2010 09:17 AM (piR98)
Any more than everyone who works with the public? I doubt it, since people are reduced to nothing but their clothes and carry-ons by the time they get to the TSA brownshirts. I'd say that your average waitress has to put up with more shit, especially on the night shift, not to mention the average crime in a city that comes with those jobs.
Night shift at the 7/11. Now that's hazardous duty.
Posted by: Soona at November 22, 2010 09:17 AM (v1Ogb)
Posted by: shillelagh at November 22, 2010 09:18 AM (Oz4Bj)
I thought by definition, chaps were always assless
Posted by: negentropy at November 22, 2010 09:20 AM (27KAF)
People are going to avoid flying if at all possible. I feel for business travelers. My husband used to be a Delta Platinum frequent flyer. He's doing to happy dance he no longer has to travel on business.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 09:20 AM (UOM48)
Not only are the peasants revolting, they're stinky, too. Can you imagine a real cop complaining about the aroma of his clients?
Next time I'm forced to fly somewhere I'm going to eat my weight in bean burritos the night before. I wonder if I could teach myself to vomit on command? I never thought that'd be a usefull life skill but now I wonder.
Posted by: cali grump at November 22, 2010 01:14 PM (hL0k
Have you seen these degenerates that pass as TSA agents? The look like rejects from The Office - How'd You get Your GED?
Posted by: tangonine at November 22, 2010 09:20 AM (x3YFz)
I think it's SOP for them to make you take your pets out of their carriers. We flew with two cats, one of which is a complete twitch, and found out - much to our chagrin - that we had to take them out of the carriers in LAX at the passenger screening area. Thankfully, we managed to grab them firmly enough, but the chaos was considerable since we also had laptop bags with us.
We had called the airlines well before flying and read as much as we could to make sure we understood the routine, but still were treated to this surprise. Had we known, we would have put them into harnesses with leashes prior to loading them into their carriers.
Posted by: Y-not at November 22, 2010 09:21 AM (UcOiF)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 09:21 AM (UOM48)
She is enjoying barry's problems way too much, almost as if she is planning to run against him.
My theory is that (as a former Goldwater girl) she is taking the strategy of being drafted. Yes, you heard it here first. Expect a Draft Hillary in 2012 campaign to start in the spring.
Posted by: nine coconuts at November 22, 2010 09:22 AM (DHNp4)
They need to send their story to Mike Rowe from Dirty jobs. Then we could all watch an hour of how dirty their job really is.
I would also tend to discount this claim that "most passengers" have poor hygiene since in the many times I flown the people whom I've sat next to didn't stink.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 22, 2010 09:22 AM (tf9Ne)
buzz
you know how long the line would be to be groped if mike rowe were the groper? endless............
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 22, 2010 09:23 AM (Cm66w)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 09:24 AM (UOM48)
You read that right. They had to chase cats.
Chasing pussy? That's no different than millions of college boys after dark.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 22, 2010 09:24 AM (DZVrI)
90 I look forward to all my future business trips. Seeing the country by car, stopping at diners, visiting more hotels than I normally would have, will be therapeutic. Not only that, the $$ I would have wasted on airlines will be distributed as I see fit into the pockets of mom & pop diners, out-of-the way motels, and more gas stations.
I'll be helping the economy, visiting the nation, meeting people, and giving Obama and the TSA a big FUCK YOU.
If you could do it in a classic Business Coup it would be even more therapeutic.
Posted by: maddogg at November 22, 2010 09:24 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Wade1970 at November 22, 2010 09:25 AM (MQOrx)
Posted by: Socratease at November 22, 2010 09:25 AM (Cw79V)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at November 22, 2010 09:26 AM (PLvLS)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 22, 2010 09:26 AM (PaSAU)
Posted by: Jean at November 22, 2010 09:27 AM (judfL)
112
who is this gregory of yardale? put him on the no fly list but only after a thorough cavity search has been performed...
Posted by: janet napalitano at November 22, 2010 09:27 AM (Cm66w)
We once had a cat who loved to ride in the car. The two we have now carry on in their carrier on the way to the vet like they've been set on fire.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 09:29 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Picky at November 22, 2010 09:30 AM (1hGEV)
Posted by: cali grump at November 22, 2010 09:30 AM (hL0k8)
You know what's funny? Despite the leftists jumping to TSA's defense in print and the 'tubes lately, I'll bet that the vast majority of actual complainers in the airport security line are libs. It fits the profile.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 22, 2010 09:30 AM (DZVrI)
Posted by: RNB at November 22, 2010 12:53 PM (fe/Mk)
Oh really?
...she continued, moving the back of her hands up my inner thighs to the "point of resistance. See that wasn't so bad now, was it?"
Indeed it wasn't. And the passengers I met along the way didn't seem to mind either.
"Whatever keeps us safe," I heard more than once.So except for her part saying the grope wasn't so bad, and people mostly don't complain, and it wasn't really that intrusive... it wasn't in defense of that?
Posted by: gekkobear at November 22, 2010 09:30 AM (X0NX1)
Pre'sent Toonces administration enacts draconian TSA strip searches in an effort to hurt the airline industry enough, so as to make a GM/Chrysler style bailout and governmental takeover the industry possible.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 22, 2010 09:31 AM (eCAn3)
Or they want to bankrupt the airlines so the government can swoop in and take control of them.
Posted by: Ian S. at November 22, 2010 09:32 AM (p05LM)
Posted by: John Pistole at November 22, 2010 09:32 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 09:32 AM (UOM48)
a kitteh that enjoys flying?
sure this wasn't some alien being impersonating a kitteh?
It's not so far fetched. I've had cats get just as excited as a dog to go riding in a car. Didn't even need a carrier. Left the window open a little so it could stick its head out and sniff the air. The behaviour of pets depends on familiarity with different enviroments and how secure they feel with their owners around. If the animal doesn't feel secure around you, it'll definitely not feel secure in a strange place.
Posted by: Soona at November 22, 2010 09:34 AM (v1Ogb)
Posted by: cali grump at November 22, 2010 09:34 AM (hL0k8)
Yup. I can see it now:
drooling liberal: "I'm outrageously outraged that I got groped by the TSA. But those teabaggrz, they're CRAZY!!!111!!!!111!!!!"
Posted by: chemjeff at November 22, 2010 09:34 AM (PaSAU)
And when the Catch the CAT, or the Penguin, they would then have probable Cause to search them....
ME? who is just trying to go about his legal business??? Not so much.
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 22, 2010 09:35 AM (AdK6a)
It's not so far fetched. I've had cats get just as excited as a dog to go riding in a car. Didn't even need a carrier. Left the window open a little so it could stick its head out and sniff the air. The behaviour of pets depends on familiarity with different enviroments and how secure they feel with their owners around. If the animal doesn't feel secure around you, it'll definitely not feel secure in a strange place.
Heh. If I turned my squirrel loose in an airliner, they would make a movie about it.
Posted by: maddogg at November 22, 2010 09:36 AM (OlN4e)
No, the REAL problem is you pesky Americans, and your Constitution...
How can we implement our one world Government made up of Citizens of the World, if you keep getting in the way?
Posted by: Progresive at November 22, 2010 09:36 AM (AdK6a)
Yep, ours flew in carriers under the seat. The grey boy was completely quiet. The Siamese had to "talk" a bit - natch. She wasn't upset, just wanted to let us know she was in her carrier.
Posted by: Y-not at November 22, 2010 09:36 AM (UcOiF)
Err, fliers?
sorry. I am a hockey fan, a penguins fan to be specific. So I was thinking of Flyers, like the philly flyers.
If only Bob Probert were still playing hockey against Philadelphia (and alive)...those headlines would write...nah, the J-school grads still couldn't figure it out.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at November 22, 2010 09:37 AM (8lCJT)
http://tinyurl.com/24hn933
"But thatÂ’s (war against AmericansÂ’ civil liberties) not the approach those networks took when it was the Bush administration taking steps to protect citizens against potential attack. Instead, as a 2006 analysis by the Media Research Center documented, the networks firmly aligned themselves with those who saw the Patriot Act and the electronic surveillance of international phone calls as a dire threat to civil liberties."
Posted by: CUS at November 22, 2010 09:39 AM (wOGfT)
sure this wasn't some alien being impersonating a kitteh?
Posted by: chemjeff at November 22, 2010 01:25 PM (PaSAU)
Nah, she was arrested for shooting her boyfriend, so she can no longer be my kitteh
Posted by: Gary Seven at November 22, 2010 09:40 AM (e4sSD)
Also i have a real problem being groped. I would prefer to strip down to a speedo or my tighty whities. Is that legal? I'll bet the creeps would grope me anyway just to assert their athoritayyy.
Posted by: nine coconuts at November 22, 2010 09:42 AM (DHNp4)
Pre'sent Toonces administration enacts draconian TSA strip searches in an effort to hurt the airline industry enough, so as to make a GM/Chrysler style bailout and governmental takeover the industry possible.
to help kick start the flying car industry where GM already has invested billions of secret TARP money.
(If your gonna wear tin foil, go with the restaurant grade)
Posted by: nine coconuts at November 22, 2010 09:46 AM (DHNp4)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 09:47 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Soona at November 22, 2010 09:49 AM (v1Ogb)
Posted by: Ian S. at November 22, 2010 09:50 AM (p05LM)
I'M TIRED OF THESE MOTHERFUCKING SQUIRRELS ON THIS MOTHERFUCKING PLANE
Posted by: SAMUEL L. JACKSON at November 22, 2010 09:51 AM (PaSAU)
The first airline or airport to conduct it's own screenings will be sued out of existence in two weeks as black and moslums file suit after frivolous suit.
To which should ask yourself: "Why are not these groups suing now?" ('cause they agree with it for their own reasons; the blacks because "whitey got it commin" and the moslums 'cause they support their brothers in jihad and they know the feds won't do fuck-all to stop a real terrorist.)
I've been beating this drum for a while now: The right needs to start deploying lawfare against the left, use their own rules against them. Why aren't these people who've been molested filing federal civil rights claims against the feds? The seriousness of the allegation--it was only because of my skin color--is more important than the facts and law.
Posted by: jimmuy at November 22, 2010 09:52 AM (CzM/Y)
Posted by: Speller at November 22, 2010 09:52 AM (J74Py)
I made a call, ran home, threw a few things in a bag, got to Delta less than an hour before takeoff, upgraded to first class for $35 (and double miles), hurried to the gate (no security hassles) and enjoyed a cocktail as soon as my butt hit the seat.
Damn, I miss those days.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 22, 2010 09:53 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 22, 2010 09:57 AM (PaSAU)
Posted by: Timwi at November 22, 2010 10:07 AM (Sxt4Z)
"Ma'am, that's a protected species. You'll have to take the penguin to the zoo."
Next day: "I've seen this penguin before! What are you doing with it now?"
"Well sir, you said to take him to the zoo, and he enjoyed it so much, I thought perhaps we'd go again today!"
When you take it in hand to "govern" the Americans, you're not chasing cats.
You're herding them.
Posted by: comatus at November 22, 2010 10:08 AM (hrwMe)
Posted by: Ian S. at November 22, 2010 01:50 PM (p05LM)
There are also people pointing out that Soros was a major investor of the company too. And that he also might have just sold his stock a few days ago. So he got his money out of it and now is getting out.
Posted by: buzzion at November 22, 2010 10:08 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: SOMEASSHOLESTOLEMYPEN at November 22, 2010 10:09 AM (VmAoa)
Posted by: Y-not at November 22, 2010 10:14 AM (UcOiF)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 22, 2010 10:26 AM (B7dyo)
opened a cooler to find a live penguin
Did the cooler belong to Mario Lemiux?
*doobie*doobie*doo* Don't fear the penguin, baby!
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at November 22, 2010 10:26 AM (1hM1d)
I have to travel a lot for my job, but I will ask to drive in all feasible cases (any trip that's less than a 15-hour drive).
If I am forced to fly, I will opt out of the scans. A machine has no conscience--it doesn't care that it's violating your rights. I want the TSA person to feel conscience--I want them to know that they're making a living by sexually assaulting innocent Americans. Eventually it will sink in and they won't be able to rely on the "I was just following orders" excuse.
Posted by: Palandine at November 22, 2010 10:27 AM (g7D8V)
Posted by: John "Pull My" Pistole at November 22, 2010 10:27 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 22, 2010 10:27 AM (GgXZc)
Did the cooler belong to Mario Lemiux?
*doobie*doobie*doo* Don't fear the penguin, baby!
+10000 for the reference.
Posted by: Ben at November 22, 2010 10:35 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 22, 2010 10:36 AM (B7dyo)
Posted by: billygoat at November 22, 2010 10:36 AM (5qJM5)
Posted by: Palandine at November 22, 2010 02:27 PM (g7D8V)
Hey...it worked for me.
Posted by: Rudolf Hess at November 22, 2010 10:37 AM (5qJM5)
Meh
The OMG LOOK AT WHAT TSA DID THIS TIME!!!! frenzy is getting a little monotonous.
Yes and no. It does seem like this stuff comes in waves with the media, but this is in reaction to recently impletmented rules. And people fly all the time for business and pleasure. This is affecting a large percentage of the population.
Moreover, this is an issue about how far is too far. At what point have we given up to much freedom in the name of security.
American citizens are being subjected to physical inspection as though we were entering an authoritarian country. Actually, having flown into and out of china, I can attest that they are much more lenient than we are.
Posted by: Ben at November 22, 2010 10:38 AM (wuv1c)
This as an alternative to the screening equipment.
Posted by: kathysaysso at November 22, 2010 10:43 AM (ZtwUX)
Posted by: Angry Beaver at November 22, 2010 10:44 AM (SjwIZ)
Posted by: RNB at November 22, 2010 12:53 PM (fe/Mk)
I just wanted to point out the Double Layer Retardedness here.
You see, Ravitz is helping the TSA distract attention from their horrific record by engaging in what any complete failure does - blame the victim.
RNB is doing for Ravitz what she's doing for the TSA - blaming us because we noticed what she was doing.
Because they're all assholes. If the TSA wanted respect, they would stand up, admit failure, and say what they were doing to correct it.
Whining about how bad other people are, blaming those subject to your mandated assholery for it, and crying when you get caught are NOT "signs of greatness."
I think Cee Lo Green wrote a song for you guys.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at November 22, 2010 10:58 AM (bxiXv)
If I were a more frequent flyer, I'd be a helluva lot more concerned about some of the IFEs I've been hearing about. The pilot can barrel roll the a/c or put it into a dive, and the passengers can (and have) subdue some chucklehead, but there's not too much you can do when your engines flame out.
TSA hanky panky -> fewer passengers -> decreasing revenues -> less money for a/c recapitalization + layoffs -> shoddier maintenance -> dude, where's my engine?
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at November 22, 2010 11:07 AM (8lCJT)
Oh, I'm sure that all the flunkies who got their jobs through nepotism, favoritism, and affirmative action smell like Chanel perfume and daisies, and their breath smells of the finest bottled water.
Posted by: kbdabear at November 22, 2010 11:23 AM (vdfwz)
I keep forgetting some people enjoy this stuff. So, CJ, in your opinion, who has the best ball-handling skills in the TSA?
Dang. Straight to da gay Empire o' Jeff?
You don't sense just tinsy bit of mindless ME TOO-ing afoot?
Posted by: CJ at November 22, 2010 11:27 AM (9KqcB)
Yes and no. It does seem like this stuff comes in waves with the media, but this is in reaction to recently impletmented rules. And people fly all the time for business and pleasure. This is affecting a large percentage of the population.
Ben, and I admit one clear bias: with two young kids and a fixed budget, my family isn't flying anywhere anytime soon.
Overall, if we're to debate security, I'd rather take the Ann Coulter, and address the real problem - the fear of profiling:
You have to search for the terrorists.
Fortunately, that's the one advantage we have in this war. In a lucky stroke, all the terrorists are swarthy, foreign-born, Muslim males. (Think: "Guys Madonna would date.")
This would give us a major leg up -- if only the country weren't insane.
Posted by: CJ at November 22, 2010 11:32 AM (9KqcB)
Try workin Taco Bell drive-thru at 3am. I've hadta put up with weirder shit that this.
Posted by: Keapon Laffin at November 22, 2010 01:01 PM (C0XAt)
I never watch CNN, so I don't know anything about this report, but I have to say I would not want to work for TSA. You would have to put with being called nazi or being fired. I mean it is a lousy job in a crappy economy and I think some of the personal and nasty comments that have been directed toward these people are kind of unfair really.
Posted by: Terrye at November 22, 2010 01:26 PM (UYcqZ)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 22, 2010 01:28 PM (B7dyo)
Posted by: David at November 22, 2010 02:22 PM (Bt8Y2)
Posted by: Fred Flatulencia at November 22, 2010 02:54 PM (RRw/Y)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 22, 2010 05:28 PM (B7dyo)
Kids today.....
Posted by: CJ at November 22, 2010 06:18 PM (tNWxq)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2204 seconds, 297 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Or extremists and incessant whiners. Sounds like Obama blaming Bush for rain on the parade.
Don't think about being creatively compliant, either. Offering to strip down rather than take the TSA grope doesn't prevent your being arrested and fined.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 22, 2010 08:32 AM (H+LJc)