January 19, 2010
— Ace Point fingers at us? Well, Mr. Fancypants, who saddled me with having to embrace a hard-left agenda?
Brown Capitalized on Concerns About National Democrats— From the beginning, Brown labeled President Obama's health care and cap and trade plans as tax increases. Polling throughout the race showed this to be the most effective attack on Coakley.
— Coakley's lead dropped significantly after the Senate passed health care reform shortly before Christmas and after the Christmas Eve "bombing" incident. Polling showed significant concerns with the actions of Senator Nelson to hold out for a better deal. Senator Nelson's actions specifically hurt Coakley who was forced to backtrack on her opposition to the abortion restriction amendment.
— Democrats concerns with Obama's Afghanistan plan forced Coakley to oppose the Afghan war in the primary, which hurt her in the general.
And yet we'll be told all night this has nothing to do with Obama. (Except if she wins, in which case it has everything to do with Captain Wonderful.)
The White House shot back:
UPDATE: A White House official e-mails: "It's a little mind-boggling to see political consultants spin the election before the election is even over. There's only one reason to do that."
What dips, if you know what I mean, and I think you do.
Posted by: Ace at
12:10 PM
| Comments (115)
Post contains 234 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Vet Missing Parts at January 19, 2010 12:12 PM (qPu42)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at January 19, 2010 12:12 PM (Q41Zh)
I think may actually have to give this dipping thing a shot. The pudding sounded smooth and this is getting exciting. Hot damn.
Posted by: California Red at January 19, 2010 12:13 PM (KYB3U)
Posted by: Luca Brasi at January 19, 2010 12:16 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: enoxo at January 19, 2010 12:16 PM (eXWg4)
At least in the end, there will be only..
Damn, somebody didn't want me to break out the "c-word" today. I would have taken that somebody up on their offer to finance my '90s Skinemax pron addiction, but I won't.
Nobody has that kind of money. Not even me.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at January 19, 2010 12:16 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: Teabagger at January 19, 2010 12:16 PM (vuNAy)
Posted by: ford at January 19, 2010 12:16 PM (Ki7fm)
Posted by: Barry Obama at January 19, 2010 12:16 PM (Pq3ay)
Everything.
Posted by: s'moron at January 19, 2010 12:17 PM (p1s9n)
Posted by: Barney Frank at January 19, 2010 12:17 PM (Ki7fm)
I'm thinking a bottle of bubblebath and a bottle of chilled champagne.
I might even take a picture. (Not of the actual dipping process.)
Posted by: Zimriel at January 19, 2010 12:18 PM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Vat of Butterscotch at January 19, 2010 12:19 PM (cxGtL)
I seriously hope Obama does double down. The American people have neither the time nor the inclination to be mad all the time, and I worry they might lose the momentum that this righteous fury gives to the prospect of tossing some of these martinets out on their ass.
If Obama tones it down and goes more centrist, well that will be good for the country I suppose, but I don't want to see the jerk back in office.
Posted by: doug at January 19, 2010 12:19 PM (UpJts)
Hey, I tried the vodka, just for a warm-up. It doesn't burn at all. Or maybe I'm just tough that way. Only 80 proof though.
Gonna be quite a night.
Posted by: comatus at January 19, 2010 12:19 PM (/VEEI)
Posted by: booter at January 19, 2010 12:19 PM (eimUK)
Posted by: Barney Frank at January 19, 2010 12:19 PM (Ki7fm)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 12:20 PM (kEBiX)
"The Coakley burger used to be called the Gisele Bundchen burger, after Tom Brady's girlfriend," says Bartley. "It's strange: The Gisele used to actually sell but since the name change, no one seems to want a Martha."
Posted by: notropis at January 19, 2010 12:20 PM (lfQrB)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 12:21 PM (YCvqc)
Coakley is full of shit. I first talked about this race back in early December. Here's what I said:
Up here in MA we have a senate race going on to fill Deady Kennedy's seat.
We have 4 (D)'s trying to out-moonbat each other in order to win the primary. One guy, Rep Capuano (D-Pelosi's Crotch), is running against Dick Cheney. I shit you not. Capuano has a tv ad saying he'll fight 'people like Dick Cheney' for you if you send him to the Senate.
But all 4 of them are running ads telling us how much they love abortions, taxes for the rich, ObamaCare, Cap & Trade, and more money to create 'green' jobs. I am living in the center of the Universe of Lies, as Rush calls it.
Posted by: a.k.a. at December 04, 2009 07:50 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: This is...it doesn't matter, just read it at January 19, 2010 12:21 PM (jVldi)
Posted by: Monty at January 19, 2010 12:22 PM (4Pleu)
Jesus, if she didn't like the agenda she should have run against it!
Coakley just emailed the White House:
Why didn't you come to me like a fucking man and tell me not to believe in the things I believe in?
Posted by: Truman North at January 19, 2010 12:22 PM (e8YaH)
Posted by: curious at January 19, 2010 12:23 PM (p302b)
Posted by: newser at January 19, 2010 12:23 PM (OBUuM)
Posted by: Coakley Chokely at January 19, 2010 12:23 PM (qyKoF)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 19, 2010 12:23 PM (pZEar)
Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 12:24 PM (QrA9E)
Would there have even been an election if the Dems in Mass hadn't changed the Senate appointment rules back in 2004? I can't wait for a pundit to point out tonight that it was Teddy's meddling that setup the perfect storm. A sceond best case would be that there antics after Teddy's passing were somehow to blame. I just get the feeling they were gaming this seat so badly that they deserve to lose it. "It's the People's seat."
Posted by: California Red at January 19, 2010 12:24 PM (KYB3U)
Stimulus - fail.
Unemployment - fail.
NJ - fail.
VA - fail.
Olympics - fail.
Copenhagen - fail.
MA - fail.
But it's NOT his fault.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 12:24 PM (kEBiX)
Just call it a Fur Burger, and I'll have a sack of 'em!
Posted by: Rosie O'Donnell at January 19, 2010 12:24 PM (wOGfT)
Coakley and all the (D)'s thought this would be a can o' corn, easy-peasy. They thought just by being Democrats and not Republicans was enough. They thought all they had to do was pander to the base and whoever comes out on top of the primary is automatically the new senator.
---------------------------------------
During one of the debates between the 4 (D)'s running for Senate in MA,one of them called Capuano 'the Sarah Palin of the Democrat party.'
This is where we are. We have (D) candidates thinking that just by invoking the name 'Sarah Palin' in some derogatory remark can score political points.
Posted by: a.k.a. at December 04, 2009 07:57 AM
Posted by: This is...it doesn't matter, just read it at January 19, 2010 12:25 PM (jVldi)
Posted by: curious at January 19, 2010 12:25 PM (p302b)
Those aren't the memos sent by an organization that thinks it's winning.
Posted by: Techie at January 19, 2010 12:26 PM (wVPwI)
Ahh...nice to see them blaming each other even before the voting is done.
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 19, 2010 12:26 PM (1Jaio)
As good as Scott Brown is, I think we really must accept that he was lucky in his draw of an opponent here. What a total scrunt.
Posted by: The Chewbacca Defense at January 19, 2010 12:27 PM (YMZjg)
I heard someone say somewhere that capuano warned coakley that she was in for a hell of a fight and she didn't believe him. (they said he had been all around the state and he said this to her when he lost)
Posted by: curious at January 19, 2010 12:27 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 12:27 PM (kEBiX)
26. Who the hell eats butterscotch
Eat?????!!!! Its for the ball dipping. Although, i would recommend Bosco, tastier for the wives and girlfriends to remove.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at January 19, 2010 12:28 PM (cniXs)
Dumb politics from their POV.
Posted by: PJ at January 19, 2010 12:28 PM (Qpxxz)
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 12:30 PM (UJIeT)
If any ladies want to dip their analogous parts in caramel, I think I could solve this quandary.
Posted by: INCITEmarsh at January 19, 2010 12:30 PM (31oQh)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 12:31 PM (YCvqc)
Posted by: The Goose at January 19, 2010 12:31 PM (9Sbz+)
Or you could go for a Gisele burger, once the name is changed back tomorrow.
Posted by: notropis at January 19, 2010 12:31 PM (lfQrB)
I'd be selling Brown at 84 too. Why take a chance on fraud?
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 19, 2010 12:32 PM (2XJ8M)
Posted by: Chrissy Mathews at January 19, 2010 12:34 PM (YCVBL)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 12:35 PM (YCvqc)
this stuff is all some deep maskirovka -
Hi ya Monty. I'll bet with your education you knew that term long before I did. First time I saw it, Red Storm Rising. Great book if you go for Clancy's stuff.
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 12:37 PM (QdUKm)
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 12:37 PM (UJIeT)
Posted by: mikeyslaw at January 19, 2010 12:38 PM (QMGr1)
I'll volunteer to help clean them up.
Or you could go for a Gisele burger, once the name is changed back tomorrow.
Why not a Brown Burger? Oh, I see.
Posted by: CUS at January 19, 2010 12:39 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 12:40 PM (QdUKm)
Posted by: loppyd
If this is true, then I doubt that there's any way that the House will ram the Senate version through.Why would they proceed if the Senate Dems won't support their own bill?
Posted by: Blue Hen at January 19, 2010 12:41 PM (R2fpr)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 04:40 PM (QdUKm)
It's up 2 1/8 today.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 19, 2010 12:41 PM (T0NGe)
Is there really any way we should actually count this as a loss? I mean at the worst its a push. A seat held by a democrat is still held by a democrat. But even that should be considered a win. I think this a seat that the republican really has no business at all being in contention for, let alone winning. It really seems like this is a win no matter what as long as we take the proper lesson away from it. It tells us that no democrat is safe this year as long a we pick the right candidate to run. As long as they have a message that doesn't come off as democrat-lite. Brown doesn't come off as just a slightly less liberal version of Coakley.
Keep in mind that this year almost every seat should be in play and plan for that. Make that the gameplan and we'll likely have the upper hand since the DNC might not be planning on needing to spend money in every race since they probably have some thinking of there being safe havens.
Posted by: buzzion at January 19, 2010 12:41 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 12:41 PM (UJIeT)
Posted by: Monty at January 19, 2010 12:42 PM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Cheney's Power Mane at January 19, 2010 12:44 PM (qcgPU)
If this is true, then I doubt that there's any way that the House will ram the Senate version through.Why would they proceed if the Senate Dems won't support their own bill?
Posted by: Blue Hen at January 19, 2010 04:41 PM (R2fpr)
Could Queen Nancy be losing control of her kingdom?
Kucinich said he is against the mandate, the tax on cadillac plans, won't vote for a tax increase on his constituents.
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 12:44 PM (UJIeT)
Like a fine wine honey I get better everyday, very few libs to pick on here but when I find one I rail on them. Hahahaha
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 12:45 PM (YCvqc)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 19, 2010 12:46 PM (2XJ8M)
Posted by: Chrissy Mathews at January 19, 2010 12:46 PM (YCVBL)
Happy to hear it 'Nam. I deal with the moonbats on a daily basis up here which makes this moment all the more enjoyable.
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 12:47 PM (UJIeT)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 12:49 PM (c459z)
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 12:50 PM (UJIeT)
Hey, I tried the vodka, just for a warm-up. It doesn't burn at all. Or maybe I'm just tough that way. Only 80 proof though.
Gonna be quite a night.
Posted by: comatus at January 19, 2010 04:19 PM (/VEEI)
Break out the Everclear and report back to us...
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent (M) at January 19, 2010 12:51 PM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 12:52 PM (c459z)
Posted by: George Orwell at January 19, 2010 12:53 PM (LMfg6)
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at January 19, 2010 12:54 PM (cniXs)
Posted by: Monty at January 19, 2010 12:54 PM (4Pleu)
The Farmer in the Dell new lyrics:
A dipping I will go
A dipping I will go
Fuck You, the Barry-O
A dipping I will go
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent (M) at January 19, 2010 12:55 PM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 12:56 PM (c459z)
Just got off the phone w/ Brown HQ. Reports of voter fraud in Lawrence - the video posted by Ace earlier - photcopying absentee ballots. Also voters in Malden being told they can't run their ballot through the machine without stating who they voted for.
My assignment has been changed. Not to either of those towns, but my new destination is considered a high priority.
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 12:58 PM (UJIeT)
Posted by: Sen Ben Nelson (D-NE) at January 19, 2010 12:59 PM (qcgPU)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 01:00 PM (c459z)
Heads. Pikes. Some assembly required.
loppyd, thanks for keeping us informed.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 19, 2010 01:01 PM (mR7mk)
People didn't fall for that, did they?!
Posted by: Tami at January 19, 2010 01:01 PM (VuLos)
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 01:02 PM (c459z)
voters in Malden being told they can't run their ballot through the machine without stating who they voted for.
Is the campaign getting people with video cameras out there? Are you tipping Andrew Breitbart in case all that speculation is true?
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at January 19, 2010 01:04 PM (cniXs)
I run a good boat my friend anything you want to do is fine, war stories are always good entertainment.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 01:05 PM (YCvqc)
Posted by: always right at January 19, 2010 01:07 PM (7GfKM)
Posted by: Monty at January 19, 2010 01:10 PM (4Pleu)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at January 19, 2010 01:10 PM (YCvqc)
He's got good books, try them.
I also like the Stephen Coonts books. My dad, retired LTC Army, swears by all the WEB Griffin series. I haven't gotten into that, yet.
I'm still waiting for someone to make Clancy's Without Remorse into a movie. If they stuck by the book, that would kick ass.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at January 19, 2010 01:10 PM (UEEex)
Is the campaign getting people with video cameras out there? Are you tipping Andrew Breitbart in case all that speculation is true?
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at January 19, 2010 05:04 PM (cniXs)
I don't know about video. I heard it on the radio then it was backed up by HQ.
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 01:10 PM (UJIeT)
Michelle is on it:
6) Hearing from readers that voters in Malden were asked to identify who they were going to vote for before they were allowed to vote.
Posted by: loppyd at January 19, 2010 01:13 PM (UJIeT)
Posted by: Jay in Ames at January 19, 2010 01:18 PM (UEEex)
Send it to Breitbart Loppyd. Just in case.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at January 19, 2010 01:19 PM (cniXs)
Thanks Jay, I'll check those out too. I think I have one of Coonts' books but it's been a long time. Mostly silver cover if I remember correctly. Hmmm, I'll have to pull that one out if I can find it.
Time to head out almost. Pick up girl scout cookies, and go floor coach a "neice" (good friend's daughter) in gymnastics.
Go get 'em Brown!!eleventy!!
And you morons be careful tonight. Get. Designated. Drivers. Don't want to lose any of you.
Posted by: teej at January 19, 2010 01:19 PM (c459z)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1953 seconds, 243 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: s'moron at January 19, 2010 12:11 PM (p1s9n)