December 31, 2010
— Gabriel Malor One last bit of news in the old year, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals has stayed the EPA from taking over Texas' emissions regime, at least temporarily.
Texas filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington yesterday, saying the EPA didnÂ’t give adequate notice or allow for comments on a proposed federal takeover of the stateÂ’s air permitting program on Jan. 2. Last night, the court ordered the agency to hold off on its plan while the court considers whether to delay the move until the case is resolved.The appeals court ordered the EPA to respond to TexasÂ’s motion by Jan. 6. Challenges to federal rules are brought directly to appeals courts.
This is simply an administrative stay for the court to consider Texas' motion to preliminarily enjoin the EPA until the litigation is resolved, which is why I say it's only temporary.
There's plenty of background on the Texas takeover at this HotAir post from Monday. The short version is that the EPA says Texas isn't doing enough to regulate emissions, particularly carbon, with its state-level programs, so instead it gets to feel the boot of the federal government on its neck.
On Monday, Ed noted the odd timing of EPA's decision. It was announced just two days before Christmas, with implementation to take place on January 2. I've written at length and several times over the past year about the Obama Administration's startlingly frequent disregard for federal law when it comes to regulatory decisions.
Obama and his fellow bureaucrats are right that Congress has ceded a great deal of authority to the Executive Branch to do pretty much whatever it wants in certain areas. But a significant limit on governance by executive fiat exists both under the Due Process clause and the Administrative Procedure Act. Before the President can just order the Environmental Prosecution Agency to tie lead weights to Texas' economy, he must give Texas notice and an opportunity to respond.
This same restriction tripped up the Obama Administration in the Gulf and at Yucca Mountain this year, where courts deemed lawless various attempts by the Interior Department to arbitrarily favor economy-killing liberal policies over other alternatives. I expect 2011 will be much the same.
Thanks to @irishspy.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:04 PM
| Comments (77)
Post contains 390 words, total size 3 kb.
You may have just sneaked in the Understatement of the Year before the midnight cutoff.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 31, 2010 02:12 PM (swuwV)
There must be legislative authority for all regulations. I wonder what piece of legislation the EPA is citing.
Posted by: swamp yankee at December 31, 2010 02:13 PM (3DIBw)
Posted by: Ohio I've got a f'ing flu Dan at December 31, 2010 02:16 PM (YO7QO)
Posted by: EPA at December 31, 2010 02:18 PM (kho+0)
"This is the great Democratic bet with ObamaCare. The assumption is that once the benefits start to flow in 2013 the constituency for "free" health care will grow. As spending and deficits climb, the pressure for higher taxes will become inexorable and the GOP will splinter into its balanced budget and antitax wings. A value-added tax or some other money-machine will pass and guarantee that the government will control 40% to 50% of all economic resources."
Reason to keep fighting and hold the GOP accountable.
Happy New Year, morons.
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at December 31, 2010 02:22 PM (S/p3p)
I always wondered if the people of Texas kinda knew what was going to go down in the future when they originally designed this.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at December 31, 2010 02:22 PM (tETqd)
Posted by: Ezra of the Hill People at December 31, 2010 02:26 PM (+iY8m)
Posted by: blaster at December 31, 2010 02:30 PM (MrMxG)
Posted by: SurferDoc at December 31, 2010 02:33 PM (o3bYL)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 31, 2010 02:36 PM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 31, 2010 02:37 PM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 31, 2010 02:39 PM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Ohio I've got a f'ing flu Dan at December 31, 2010 02:39 PM (YO7QO)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 31, 2010 02:42 PM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Ronster at December 31, 2010 02:43 PM (Ikn3z)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 31, 2010 02:44 PM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 31, 2010 02:45 PM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Mephitis at December 31, 2010 02:47 PM (ehXLT)
How do they get people to stand around in the cold for New Years?
Might have something to do with large quantities of liquor.
Posted by: Ronster at December 31, 2010 02:48 PM (Ikn3z)
Posted by: eman at December 31, 2010 02:49 PM (+iY8m)
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 31, 2010 02:51 PM (DLxD/)
Posted by: AZDREAMER at December 31, 2010 02:51 PM (hLD+S)
Posted by: Guy on the grassy knoll at December 31, 2010 02:54 PM (tJjm/)
Drive into El Paso from the east on I-10 as the sun comes up, and you'll get a great view of the horrid slums of Mexico across the border. I'm not sure who this "they" is you speak of.
Posted by: NC Ref at December 31, 2010 02:54 PM (YYVL1)
okay, can one of you *courageous* peeps saunter over to DU or Kos to see what stupid shit they're saying about the year past and the year to come so we can laff about it?
Posted by: al Soothsayer at December 31, 2010 02:55 PM (WmBF6)
Racist Republicans prevented Obama from saving the world from itself.
Posted by: NC Ref at December 31, 2010 02:56 PM (YYVL1)
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 31, 2010 02:58 PM (DLxD/)
Posted by: TC at December 31, 2010 02:59 PM (BAtLQ)
Posted by: NC Ref at December 31, 2010 03:00 PM (YYVL1)
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 31, 2010 03:03 PM (DLxD/)
Posted by: NC Ref
That seems like a culturally and architecturally insensitive and rascist comment from the typical white patriarchy, demeaning the cultural and aesthetic values of the Hispanic natives of Old Mexico.
Yeah, it's a shithole, but it's their shithole.
If you like your Mexican slums, you can keep your Mexican slums.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at December 31, 2010 03:03 PM (sJTmU)
Posted by: eman at December 31, 2010 03:05 PM (+iY8m)
Posted by: eman at December 31, 2010 03:09 PM (+iY8m)
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at December 31, 2010 07:03 PM (sJTmU)
It seems awfully racist of you to assume that I'm white. I could be Ewok or Thai tranny or nikeairmax. But its not the first time this week I've been called racist!
LOL
Posted by: NC Ref at December 31, 2010 03:10 PM (YYVL1)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 31, 2010 03:10 PM (SJ6/3)
Now, did you all know you can make pudding from dog urine? Really, it's quite true. When our dear elegant black President wins again in the next election, I'll dip my balls in it.
Posted by: Juhneen Gar-awful-o at December 31, 2010 03:10 PM (GxPL5)
Posted by: Moi at December 31, 2010 03:17 PM (Ez4Ql)
Pound Sand, then FOAD.
Time to defund their ass and send them packing to Canada.
No Love from Texas.
Posted by: TexBob at December 31, 2010 03:17 PM (7cXE7)
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 31, 2010 03:21 PM (DLxD/)
Posted by: AmishDude at December 31, 2010 03:25 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: eman at December 31, 2010 03:30 PM (+iY8m)
Posted by: befuddled at December 31, 2010 03:37 PM (xJU23)
Posted by: Texas at December 31, 2010 03:47 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Rep. Davey Crockett at December 31, 2010 03:50 PM (dYKl3)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at December 31, 2010 03:55 PM (dYKl3)
Do we really have go go through the whole dickless thing again, EPA?
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 31, 2010 03:59 PM (XBM1t)
I don't give a shit whether Congress has ceded more authority to the Executive Branch.
There reaches a point where ALL power, ALL sovereignty is being claimed by the federal government, in a total inversion of what the Constitution is all about, and I'm thinking we're nudging up to it.
This isn't called the United STATES of America for nothing.
OK, start with the Due Process clause and the Administrative Procedure Act: but if Congress itself has exceeded its authority under the 9th and 10th Amendments the states must oppose it.
Go Texas!!!
Posted by: effinayright at December 31, 2010 04:24 PM (lhk1t)
Posted by: yet another dave at December 31, 2010 04:38 PM (md4cW)
Dear EPA:
We thought about it for a long time.
Endeavor to persevere!
And when we had thought about it long enough, we declared war on the Union EPA.
Sincerely yours,
Posted by: Lone Watie at December 31, 2010 04:48 PM (XBM1t)
Why doesn't the Tea Party take a page out of the lefty play book and call a general strike. Jan. through the end of Feb. tend to be some of the slowest for most businesses, why don't most of them just shut down. When they do make sure to tell the employees that are being let go that this is being done because of Obama.
The Gov. of Texas should publically call a meeting of all State Gov's to decide how they will work to stop Obama. A good first step would be to start organizing militia units that are totally seperate from the Federal Governemnts control (National Guard). It would also take the weapons from State National Guard Units and arming these State Militia Units. Obama would be unable to Federalize these units and if he tried they could tell him to go pound sand.
Posted by: southdakotaboy at December 31, 2010 05:49 PM (VO59+)
And every time the courts told the administration that they were wrong on the Gulf, they doubled down and kept right at it. So, what would one propose to do in a situation like that?
Posted by: Additional Blond Agent at December 31, 2010 11:28 PM (SHKl9)
We can use the money to pay for Obama's vacations.
Posted by: MarkD at January 01, 2011 05:48 AM (0Jy1K)
Posted by: wholesale at January 02, 2011 05:10 PM (9xr58)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1794 seconds, 205 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Just another way for them to try and slap back at Texas. They've been going after them with everything from education to this. I don't think obumbles likes Texas.
God Bless Texas! If I could I'd moved there tomorrow.
Posted by: Steph at December 31, 2010 02:09 PM (CUlig)