February 13, 2010
— Purple Avenger Apparently, this forward thinking, visionary, and very prudent measure was put forth by Craig Mundie, chief research and strategy officer for Microsoft.
...A “driver’s licence” for the web would be Christmas every day of the year for the control freaks....Its not clear at present what the pass/fail criteria for license testing would be, who would administer them, what their duration would be, and if retesting upon renewal would be required, or if fees would be collected....Without the internet, the completely fictitious global warming “consensus” would still be unchallenged, state power massively enlarged, $54 trillion of Western taxpayers’ money flooding into the coffers of carbon companies and people’s lives made miserable by totalitarian restrictions imposed to counter a non-existent threat...
I look at it this way; if you can plug in and power up a computer to the point where its connected to the internet, you've already accomplished far more in terms of "demonstrating competence" than is required to ummm....VOTE.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at
12:29 PM
| Comments (313)
Post contains 179 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: One man, No votes at February 13, 2010 12:31 PM (JrRME)
Posted by: nine coconuts at February 13, 2010 12:33 PM (DHNp4)
Posted by: toby928 at February 13, 2010 12:33 PM (PD1tk)
I thought we already had one
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 12:34 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: dagny at February 13, 2010 12:35 PM (DLTV4)
Soon they'll rename us all 'carbon emitting units' and require us all to have licenses to breathe air.
Posted by: Blazer at February 13, 2010 12:35 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: Wheres Joe? at February 13, 2010 12:36 PM (DHNp4)
Posted by: MS Patriotism at February 13, 2010 12:36 PM (d7Px0)
Posted by: FatBaldnSassy at February 13, 2010 12:37 PM (YiECU)
Astounding. Soon they will want to license printers and copiers.
Nah, they already have invisible markers buried in them which come out on the copies.
Posted by: MS Patriotism at February 13, 2010 12:38 PM (d7Px0)
Posted by: The Original DIVX, by Circuit City at February 13, 2010 12:38 PM (YX6i/)
Really? Not clear? There is more ambiguity associated with death and taxes. It does make you wonder how this would be reported by the BBC, though.
Posted by: pep at February 13, 2010 12:42 PM (0K3p3)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 13, 2010 12:42 PM (hh4Yo)
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at February 13, 2010 12:43 PM (F09Uo)
Posted by: Bilderberg at February 13, 2010 12:43 PM (d7Px0)
Big brother. You don't want to cross big brother, do you?
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 13, 2010 12:44 PM (hh4Yo)
Other than the idiot that thought this up, who else supports it?
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at February 13, 2010 04:43 PM (F09Uo)
*ahem*
Posted by: your president, the leftist idiots in congress and every other leftist douchebag at February 13, 2010 12:44 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: I love Big Brother at February 13, 2010 12:46 PM (PD1tk)
Posted by: pep at February 13, 2010 12:48 PM (0K3p3)
Posted by: samizdat at February 13, 2010 12:49 PM (PD1tk)
Relax good people, the internet will be free. After you purchase licenses and contribute to the proper party of course.
In other news, all rations have been increased from 20 kilograms per month to 15 kilograms per month.
Have a good day.
Posted by: The Ministry Of Information at February 13, 2010 12:49 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: dagny at February 13, 2010 12:49 PM (DLTV4)
Posted by: Barry Ogabe at February 13, 2010 12:50 PM (hh4Yo)
Gee, I wonder if this could be associated with DRM (Digital rights management) in any way?
Posted by: Sharrukin at February 13, 2010 12:50 PM (593B8)
Barney Frank excepted. That is not something I even want to contemplate.
Posted by: pep at February 13, 2010 12:51 PM (0K3p3)
Big brother. You don't want to cross big brother, do you?
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 13, 2010 04:44 PM (hh4Yo)
I love Big Brother and I denounce you PA as someone that likes Big Brother somewhat less than I do.*
*just practicing for my written test.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at February 13, 2010 12:52 PM (F09Uo)
Posted by: Keith Moon at February 13, 2010 12:52 PM (1kwr2)
fuck all of them
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 12:53 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: maddogg at February 13, 2010 12:54 PM (lQT2m)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 13, 2010 12:54 PM (cpuvG)
In Talley v. California, 362 U.S. 60 (1960), the Court struck down a Los Angeles city ordinance that made it a crime to distribute anonymous pamphlets.
along with other specific protections, and prove that all emails on blogs were "sedition"
Posted by: One man, No votes at February 13, 2010 12:54 PM (JrRME)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 13, 2010 04:54 PM (cpuvG)
FIFY
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 12:54 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: Cicero at February 13, 2010 12:55 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: mpur at February 13, 2010 12:55 PM (7m5P2)
Posted by: maddogg at February 13, 2010 12:55 PM (lQT2m)
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at February 13, 2010 12:56 PM (cniXs)
Posted by: pep at February 13, 2010 12:56 PM (0K3p3)
Posted by: maddogg at February 13, 2010 04:55 PM (lQT2m)
going to go out on a limb here, and predict that Cahrles will think this is a good idea
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 12:57 PM (erIg9)
Posters (Posters de Refuse, no less) still posting on the interwebs, and giving plussies?
You are all banned. – 1000 to each of you. eleventy.
Questioning the wisdom of Microsoft is bad enough, but the Designated Hitter rule?
You are all relegated to 2400baud dialup connections and 40 column displays for eternity. I say, Adieu (turns away and presents palm).
Posted by: Larches Sojnnoh at February 13, 2010 12:57 PM (JnWYr)
I made the switch from Google to Bing a month ago. Now I find out about the X-Boxes denied to the military and this hoser. Where do I go now?
Posted by: pep at February 13, 2010 04:56 PM (0K3p3)
I make a great pet.
Posted by: The Carrier Pigeon at February 13, 2010 12:57 PM (t72+4)
who else supports it?
Fidel "weekend at bernie's" Castro, Vlad Putin, Hugo Chavez, George Soros......
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at February 13, 2010 12:58 PM (cniXs)
Posted by: Charles Johnson with Hugo Chavez at February 13, 2010 12:59 PM (DTffv)
is that wrong?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 12:59 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: Sharrukin at February 13, 2010 12:59 PM (593B8)
Posted by: garrett at February 13, 2010 04:58 PM (iVNtQ)
Link fail violation! That will cost you 1000 credits and suspension f your porn viewing privileges for 30 days.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at February 13, 2010 01:00 PM (F09Uo)
China
Posted by: mpur at February 13, 2010 04:59 PM (7m5P2)
they actually turned it down, as get this, "being too oppressive"
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:00 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 13, 2010 01:00 PM (cpuvG)
58 every day I wake up, and every day I turn on the news hoping something particularly nasty has happened to George Soros.
is that wrong?
Nope. I hope the evil bastard gets stomach cancer and eats himself slowly.
Posted by: maddogg at February 13, 2010 01:01 PM (lQT2m)
Next thing you, we'll be censored and right in the middle.of a post, you'll.
Hold on, there's someone at the door, I'll be..
Posted by: gus at February 13, 2010 01:01 PM (Vqruj)
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at February 13, 2010 01:02 PM (F09Uo)
going to go out on a limb here, and predict that Cahrles will think this is a good idea
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 04:57 PM (erIg9)
Believe it or not, Markos just may have a great big problem with this. A few years ago he stood with conservative bloggers when that Maine Democrat rep. proposed something similar to this in the House. One of the only sane moments I've seen him exhibit.
Of course that was a few years ago when his his saviour wasnt in office and his party wasnt crashing and burning, so everything may have changed since then.
Posted by: Blazer at February 13, 2010 01:02 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:03 PM (erIg9)
In 1940, the Congress enacted the Smith Act, which made it illegal to advocate "the propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force and violence." The law was mainly used as a weapon against Communist leaders. The constitutionality of the Act was questioned in Dennis v. United States 341 U.S. 494 (1951). Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson suggested that the doctrine did not require the government to "wait until the putsch is about to be executed, the plans have been laid and the signal is awaited", thereby broadly defining the words "clear and present danger." Thus, even though there was no immediate danger posed by the Communist Party's ideas, the Court allowed the Congress to restrict the Communist Party's speech.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 13, 2010 01:03 PM (JrRME)
I made the switch from Google to Bing a month ago. Now I find out about the X-Boxes denied to the military and this hoser. Where do I go n
I make a great pet.
Yeah, but their little wings get so tired carrying all those copies of Jugs-O-Plenty and He-Man Monthly.
Posted by: pep at February 13, 2010 01:03 PM (0K3p3)
Yeah, but their little wings get so tired carrying all those copies of Jugs-O-Plenty and He-Man Monthly.
Posted by: pep at February 13, 2010 05:03 PM (0K3p3)
Nothing a little JATO for pigeons cant fix, or a bottle rocket tied to each wing if you will.
Posted by: Blazer at February 13, 2010 01:05 PM (t72+4)
That was pre-Obama era though. If Il Douche supported it, Kos would carry 55gal drums of water on his back spinning it.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 13, 2010 01:05 PM (hh4Yo)
I have a simple question. What PROBLEM is this supposed to fix?
The government works for us. right?
Posted by: gus at February 13, 2010 01:06 PM (Vqruj)
put the code into some version of windows, make end users buy license keys to access the net, force compliance through key tracking?
yeah, this is the kind of thing that is a line in the sand
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:07 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 13, 2010 01:07 PM (hh4Yo)
Posted by: garrett at February 13, 2010 04:58 PM (iVNtQ)
I'll be in the corner with a Tinfoil Hat on...
Posted by: garrett at February 13, 2010 01:07 PM (iVNtQ)
Posted by: Instapundit at February 13, 2010 01:08 PM (d7Px0)
Believe it or not, Markos just may have a great big problem with this.
That was pre-Obama era though. If Il Douche supported it, Kos would carry 55gal drums of water on his back spinning it.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 13, 2010 05:05 PM (hh4Yo)
Well thats why I put the disclaimer in the bottom of the post. Bush was in office then and there was no guarantee a Democrat would get elected radical Marxist would come to power.
Posted by: Blazer at February 13, 2010 01:08 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 13, 2010 05:00 PM (cpuvG)
The Swiss aren't scandis. They're likey either Krauts or Cheese-eating wine-pussies.
Posted by: buzzion at February 13, 2010 01:08 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: SGT Dan at February 13, 2010 01:08 PM (KLFGv)
Posted by: Jean at February 13, 2010 01:08 PM (GHEon)
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at February 13, 2010 05:02 PM (F09Uo)
And if they require an approved OS to gain internet access? Websites, gateways etc, simply wouldn't connect unless you a state approved computer.
Posted by: Sharrukin at February 13, 2010 01:09 PM (593B8)
Posted by: Jean at February 13, 2010 05:08 PM (GHEon)
god yes. laying about him with a fine cane, cracking heads, leaving a wake of unconscious libs behind him.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:09 PM (erIg9)
And if they require an approved OS
to gain internet access? Websites, gateways etc, simply wouldn't connect
unless you a state approved computer.
Posted by: Sharrukin at February 13, 2010 05:09 PM (593B
yeah pretty much this. every single node connection would be sniffed for OS compliance
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:10 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: Charles Johnson at February 13, 2010 01:10 PM (d7Px0)
Posted by: maddogg at February 13, 2010 01:11 PM (lQT2m)
Televisions are licensed in Britain and there's trucks with RDF gear driving around all the time looking for bootleg TVs...so this kind of totalitarianism is not unheard of.
Pretty easy actually. Require ISP's to verify license before allowing an account to be opened. Public library computers could be fitted with mag strip readers you'd have to swipe your license through to use.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 13, 2010 01:11 PM (hh4Yo)
"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a house slipper stamping on a human face— forever." With apologies to Orwell.
Posted by: fb at February 13, 2010 01:11 PM (Bu9Jo)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:12 PM (erIg9)
I have a simple question. What PROBLEM is this supposed to fix?
The government works for us. right?
Posted by: gus at February 13, 2010 05:06 PM (Vqruj)
No, that's just how its supposed to be and was intended. The government works for themselves and expect you to pay for whatever they want no questions asked.
Who's got that quote about how if you want to be labeled a dangerous citizen today all you need to do is repeat the words spoken by our founding fathers?
Posted by: buzzion at February 13, 2010 01:12 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: dead, not sleeping at February 13, 2010 01:12 PM (u37xD)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:13 PM (erIg9)
Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories.
Thomas Jefferson
What he said............
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 13, 2010 01:13 PM (JrRME)
Posted by: FUBAR at February 13, 2010 01:14 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:14 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: Anonymous bureaucrat with a pencil-thin moustache at February 13, 2010 01:15 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Chris Matthews at February 13, 2010 01:15 PM (P33XN)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:16 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: maddogg at February 13, 2010 01:16 PM (lQT2m)
We also, I'm sorry to say, have reports of disallowed opinions being expressed from this IP.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 13, 2010 01:16 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: maddogg at February 13, 2010 05:16 PM (lQT2m)
They'd do to him what they've done to Sarah.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:17 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 13, 2010 01:18 PM (v1Ib3)
101.
I liked this one:
When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe.
Thomas Jefferson
Even 200 years ago our founders knew that attempting to model themselves after Europe was a shitty idea. Demonstrates the idiots in the Democratic Party today. And don't they claim Jefferson as one of the orginal members of their party?
Posted by: buzzion at February 13, 2010 01:18 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: ACORN at February 13, 2010 01:19 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 13, 2010 01:19 PM (LSqh5)
Thomas Jefferson was just another typical white person
"I could no sooner dis-own Jefferson than I could my own Grandmother"
(Looks under Bus)
"Gramma! How you Doin' back there? You need anything? I'm sending Eric Holder back there to check on you..."
Posted by: Barrack H. Obama - The 'H' is silent, at February 13, 2010 01:19 PM (iVNtQ)
PA and others are right. If the government has a mind to, this could be implemented a lot easier than the UK's tele tax.
Simply require all MAC addresses to be associated with a person. Every time you buy a device that could achieve network connectivity, you have to show your license then you have to register that MAC address with your ISP or they will not let you on the Internet.
This could be readily done today.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at February 13, 2010 01:19 PM (F09Uo)
Even 200 years ago our founders knew that attempting to model themselves after Europe was a shitty idea.
Jefferson was a big fan of France. But when push came to shove, he was American first.
Posted by: Chris Matthews at February 13, 2010 01:20 PM (P33XN)
Internet Users without Borders
or, in French,
Users de Internet sans Frontieres.
-
Posted by: BumperStickerist at February 13, 2010 01:20 PM (ruzrP)
Things Your Forefathers really said:
Give Me Government Rationed Healthcare And The Redistribution of Wealth, Or Give Me Death !
-Thomas Jefferson
Gentleman, We Must All Pay Our Taxes Together, Or We Shall Most Assuredly All Pay Them Seperately.
-Benjamin Franklin
Posted by: The Ministry Of Truth at February 13, 2010 01:20 PM (t72+4)
I donÂ’t have a problem with a national ID or linking criminal databases between jurisdictions, states and organizations. Yes, itÂ’s an infringement, and a very serious one too, but identity theft Â…..
But a company whose premier product looks like a worn-out bike inner tube (too many patches) and is ruthlessly avoided each time a fresh major upgrade is announced, suggesting that we need a license to access the internet?
No.
Posted by: The Gnu Penguin at February 13, 2010 01:22 PM (JnWYr)
Posted by: Jean at February 13, 2010 01:23 PM (GHEon)
Posted by: maddogg at February 13, 2010 01:24 PM (lQT2m)
http://tinyurl.com/should-not-be-on-internet
Stick with the comments for a while to figure out the fail.
I'm not calling for a license but not everyone can handle the interwebs.
Posted by: Shtetl G at February 13, 2010 01:24 PM (Jal1D)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 13, 2010 01:25 PM (v1Ib3)
Allow the market to develop ways to deal with theft, fraud, etc.. They will develop various solutions and those which work will be adopted more broadly and, as a result, security will improve over time. This is all too organic and passive for arrogant control freaks that think they can somehow tame the internet without ruining what makes it great.
Note to self: punch Craig Mundie in the face if ever given the opportunity. In case the opportunity never presents itself, just punch a random Microsoft employee.
Posted by: StickeeNotes at February 13, 2010 01:25 PM (KkmO9)
Posted by: alaska trash at February 13, 2010 01:25 PM (ypJoC)
Types of restraints on speech Time, place, or manner restrictions
Time, place, or manner restrictions must withstand intermediate scrutiny. Note that any regulations that would force speakers to change how or what they say do not fall into this category (so the government cannot restrict one medium even if it leaves open another). Time, place, or manner restrictions must:
Be content neutralBe narrowly tailored......to serve a significant governmental interestLeave open ample alternative channels for communication Content-based restrictionsRestrictions that require examining the content of speech to be applied must pass strict scrutiny.
Viewpoint-based restrictionsRestrictions that apply to certain viewpoints but not others face the highest level of scrutiny, and are usually overturned, unless they fall into one of the court's special exceptions.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 13, 2010 01:26 PM (JrRME)
Unless your one of the elite slipstreaming on somebody's connection, your CC# and various ISP/cell accounts already identify you on the internet
I think this is really much less about being able to indentify you on the internet and more about the ability to make money off you and control who gets access.
I see 3 reasonings for things like this. There is the claimed reasoning which they are always willing to talk about. Their actual reasoning which when pressed will admit is why they really want it. And then their is the fantasy speculative reasoning of what they see this as being able to do which they will swear is never the case because they haven't reached step one towards achieving it yet.
Posted by: buzzion at February 13, 2010 01:28 PM (oVQFe)
I wonder where Lerch is in all of this? Everyone knows he's got his own bathroom stall with a Glory Hole in Davos.
Posted by: Blazer at February 13, 2010 01:28 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: Chris Matthews at February 13, 2010 01:29 PM (P33XN)
Nope, don't want to cross him.
I want to punch him in the junk until he goes away.
Posted by: Troll Feeder at February 13, 2010 01:30 PM (rm9ee)
Posted by: Central Scrutinizer at February 13, 2010 01:31 PM (iVNtQ)
I can see it now:
Every time you fire up the Internet, an avatar of the Chicago Kid (with chin in air) pops up in the corner of the screen to keep an eye on you.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 13, 2010 01:31 PM (P33XN)
Posted by: maddogg at February 13, 2010 01:32 PM (lQT2m)
And don't they claim Jefferson as one of the orginal members of their party?
Yes they like to claim that but like everything tyhey say it is a lie.
Posted by: Vic at February 13, 2010 01:32 PM (QrA9E)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 13, 2010 01:33 PM (LSqh5)
24
Other than the idiot that thought this up, who else supports it?
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at February 13, 2010 04:43 PM (F09Uo)
I'm sure you'd find supporters at CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, MSNBC, CNN, The New York Times, the LA Times, the Boston Globe...
Posted by: Dang at February 13, 2010 01:33 PM (UA4gE)
And don't they claim Jefferson as one of the orginal members of their party?
Yes they like to claim that but like everything tyhey say it is a lie.
Posted by: Vic at February 13, 2010 05:32 PM (QrA9E)
They like to pretend Abraham Lincoln was too even though he was a Republican. They also like to pretend Bull Connor and George Wallace were Republicans too.
Posted by: Blazer at February 13, 2010 01:34 PM (t72+4)
Dating myself, but Max Headroom comes readily to mind.
Posted by: pep at February 13, 2010 01:35 PM (0K3p3)
Posted by: Jean at February 13, 2010 01:38 PM (GHEon)
Posted by: Butch at February 13, 2010 01:40 PM (myCYQ)
So what are you guys getting your insignificant others for Valentines Day ? Me, I'm thinking of getting Elizabeth Turbo-Will 2010.
Posted by: John Edwards at February 13, 2010 01:41 PM (t72+4)
More Ammo
Posted by: citizen khan at February 13, 2010 05:40 PM (nvOHK)
hell if that ain't ingrained into your everyday life, you're too late
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:41 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: FUBAR at February 13, 2010 01:41 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: Jean at February 13, 2010 01:43 PM (GHEon)
Posted by: citizen khan at February 13, 2010 01:43 PM (nvOHK)
What Microsoft declined was giving the military a special discount on a product that is already sold at a loss. The business model for the hardware is to make up the loss on sales of games and then make a profit on further game sales. Currently, Nintendo is the only company that says it isn't losing money on the hardware sale.
The application the DOD had in mind wouldn't have created any game sales. It for using the hardware with custom training apps. They could just as easily have used PCs for the purpose but nobody in that business wants to sell at a loss. Funny how that works, huh?
Posted by: epobirs at February 13, 2010 01:43 PM (NXCBg)
We need someone more industrious than myself to obtain and post the appropriate Microsoft email address so we can send "Are you assholes completely insane?" emails to them.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 13, 2010 05:41 PM (1fanL)
Just tape it to a brick and send it through their picture windows. They'll get the message loud and clear then.
Posted by: John Edwards at February 13, 2010 01:43 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: FUBAR at February 13, 2010 05:41 PM (1fanL)
they'd just forward all of them to flag@whitehouse.gov
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:44 PM (erIg9)
But alas we let the commies fester too long and now they are quasi permanent in our society.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at February 13, 2010 01:46 PM (/subp)
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at February 13, 2010 05:46 PM (/subp)
diversity will do that to a country
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:47 PM (erIg9)
This is the best I can come up with right now. You could mention Mundie prominently.
Posted by: George Orwell at February 13, 2010 01:51 PM (LSqh5)
Posted by: epobirs at February 13, 2010 05:43 PM (NXCBg)
Yeah, next time Microsoft needs our services, we'll be sure to drive a hard bargain.
Posted by: The Military at February 13, 2010 01:51 PM (1fanL)
The government works for us. right?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: gun owner at February 13, 2010 01:52 PM (V7VgK)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 13, 2010 05:33 PM (LSqh5)
They don't need a 100% compliance, they only need 90% and how many people are really going to know how to evade the electronic gatekeepers?
Posted by: Sharrukin at February 13, 2010 01:53 PM (593B8)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at February 13, 2010 01:54 PM (0FiCa)
Posted by: Microsoft Word Paperclip at February 13, 2010 01:55 PM (1fanL)
Some Microsoft phony gets up at Davos/
and tells me I need a license to get on the internet./
"A PC's just like a car." Man, /
You think you're foolin' me? I took the podium.../
and threw it on the ground!/
I'm an adult./
I'm not a part of your system./
My PC doesn't kill people on the freeway./
DUH!
Posted by: Bender Bending Rodriguez at February 13, 2010 01:55 PM (+PfVy)
That's a big girl too, no sitting on the couch munching on a gallon of Blue Bell with croc. tears streaming down her face.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 13, 2010 01:56 PM (Iyz0f)
As bad as a purely commercial decision is when it comes to our military, at least I can understand garden-variety human cupidity. However, that isn't what they said. The the real problem was that they said they didn't want their products associated with the military. Suck it, Microsoft.
Posted by: pep at February 13, 2010 01:56 PM (0K3p3)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 13, 2010 01:56 PM (LSqh5)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at February 13, 2010 05:54 PM (0FiCa)
I thought she shot him once, "accidentally," while learning how to load the gun.
Posted by: Microsoft Word Paperclip at February 13, 2010 01:58 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at February 13, 2010 01:58 PM (RZ8pf)
You know who I think will have a pretty big problem with all of this ?
This Guy.
Posted by: Blazer at February 13, 2010 05:55 PM (t72+4)
omfg
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 01:59 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 13, 2010 02:00 PM (LSqh5)
Thanks for that, Blazer. That was friggin awesome... Can't stop laughing...
Posted by: Bender Bending Rodriguez at February 13, 2010 02:01 PM (+PfVy)
Apparently it was a triple-barrel shotgun.
Posted by: Dr. Spank at February 13, 2010 02:02 PM (0FiCa)
Posted by: Bender Bending Rodriguez at February 13, 2010 06:01 PM (+PfVy)
"how do you exshpect a cassssshter to tank a blood prinssssh with negative dodge? oh my god oh my god"
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 02:02 PM (erIg9)
Oh, and for the record: When the TV license started in the UK, it was something like 5 pounds a year. Once everyone got one, they started raising the price--a lot. So if the Dem/socialists/marxists decided to go this route, you can expect the initial license to be a mere pittance--say 5 bucks a year. And they'll promise that the revenue will be used to do something too, too precious, like give crippled kids free internet service or something similar.
So anyone thinking of voting against it will be thoroughly vilified.
Just sayin.
Posted by: sf at February 13, 2010 02:03 PM (xz5dP)
Posted by: eman at February 13, 2010 02:04 PM (4tixt)
Was that guy for real?
It was too perfect.
Posted by: eman at February 13, 2010 06:04 PM (4tixt)
hard to say, I play and I have no doubt there are lots of people just like him
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 02:05 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at February 13, 2010 05:58 PM (RZ8pf)
Unfortunately, I blame you and your fellow Seattlites. I'm guessing this jackass is home-grown talent.
What do you have to say for yourself, young lady?
Posted by: FUBAR at February 13, 2010 02:05 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 13, 2010 02:05 PM (Iyz0f)
Dang, Blazer.
Was that guy for real?
It was too perfect.
Posted by: eman at February 13, 2010 06:04 PM (4tixt)
I think its an act. At any rate, I just picture that guy as Dum-Dum and it makes it all the more funnier for me.
Posted by: Blazer at February 13, 2010 02:07 PM (t72+4)
Someday in the distant future, books will be written (because that's what we'll be back to by then, just the books) about what has happened, on line, in the last ten years. Kind of the way good Latinists can read the graffiti on a whorehouse wall in Pompei and tell you how things worked out for the Equestrian class. The Latin was lovingly preserved in a layer of lava; some of these posts will be harder to research. And nobody will know who Paul Anka was.
More amusing, and visible during our own lifetimes, will be the way this will be taught in the colleges. "During the Wild West days of on-line newsfollowership, there were a lot of unscrupulous operators, impersonating licensed journos. They came up with the darnedest things, and really held back progress. It's amazing what people would believe in those days, with no layers of proofreading or editorship. And there was just zero co-operation with the policy board. We call it The Unsustainable Age."
Posted by: comatus at February 13, 2010 02:07 PM (/VEEI)
Sort of.
Posted by: eman at February 13, 2010 06:06 PM (4tixt)
maaaaaaaahm we need moar hot pahkets!
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 02:07 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: eman at February 13, 2010 02:08 PM (4tixt)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 13, 2010 06:05 PM (Iyz0f)
She was trying to fit in with the local culture.
Posted by: Hahvahd at February 13, 2010 02:08 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 13, 2010 02:09 PM (Iyz0f)
I'd like to witness the thought process involved in crafting this "policy." I mean, what the fuck could be going through your head when this idea appeared?
It must have been a post-ejaculation utterance.
On second thought, I rescind my statement about "witnessing the thought process."
Posted by: peoples front of judea at February 13, 2010 02:09 PM (iV4X6)
Just imagine me then; Charles Johnson, Internet Meter Maid
Posted by: Charles Johnson, License to Ban at February 13, 2010 02:09 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at February 13, 2010 02:10 PM (RZ8pf)
Yeah, we were there you stupid git. Dammit, we've already issued a fatwa against you. That's it! Double-secret fatwa for you!
Posted by: Judean People's Front at February 13, 2010 02:12 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 13, 2010 02:15 PM (Iyz0f)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at February 13, 2010 06:10 PM (RZ8pf)
I'm thinking the weather. It makes everybody miserable and suicidal, and they can't walk a block without taking a shot of really, really strong coffee. When I was there, it rained 33 straight days. I'm from the South. I NEED sunlight.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 13, 2010 02:15 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: eman at February 13, 2010 02:19 PM (4tixt)
If you find yourself with free time after we kick you off the internet, we have some vegetable gardens that need tending. Remember, "arbeit macht frei"
Posted by: Charles Johnson, Internet Czar at February 13, 2010 02:20 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 13, 2010 02:20 PM (Iyz0f)
Digital rights management (DRM) is a generic term for access control technologies that can be used by hardware manufacturers, publishers, copyright holders and individuals to try to impose limitations on the usage of digital content and devices. It is also, sometimes, disparagingly described as Digital Restrictions Management. The term is used to describe any technology which inhibits uses (legitimate or otherwise) of digital content that were not desired or foreseen by the content provider. The term generally doesn't refer to other forms of copy protection which can be circumvented without modifying the file or device, such as serial numbers or keyfiles It can also refer to restrictions associated with specific instances of digital works or devices.
So this guy is in charge of this at Microsoft. He wants to make Microsoft emperor of the world and I suppose, doesn't see or doesn't care about how this idea would be used by the nefarious marxists.
Posted by: dagny at February 13, 2010 02:20 PM (IyRH+)
He spoke up at a Clan meeting one day and said too many people have spears and only people with a spear license should have and use one.
Moments later his legs were broken and he was left to the hyenas.
One thousand years later the second control freak was born and one day he spoke up at a Clan meeting and said the same thing.
This time the man was allowed to live.
Here we are today.
Posted by: eman at February 13, 2010 06:19 PM (4tixt)
Aha! I knew those damned Ku Klux Klan racists were behind it all!
Posted by: Lefty McStupidalot at February 13, 2010 02:21 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at February 13, 2010 02:22 PM (0FiCa)
Except that Steve Jobs is a loyal lefty and probably loves this idea too.
Posted by: kbdabear at February 13, 2010 02:23 PM (sYxEE)
Yeah, we were there you stupid git. Dammit, we've already issued a fatwa against you. That's it! Double-secret fatwa for you!
Posted by: Judean People's Front at February 13, 2010 06:12 PM
Splitter!!!
Posted by: peoples front of judea at February 13, 2010 02:23 PM (iV4X6)
I think Stella just got her groove back!!
Posted by: ACORN at February 13, 2010 02:24 PM (KGJlV)
Move away from the keyboard,
Bend over & Spread em,
prepare for assimilation,
Obama's in charge.
Posted by: drfredc at February 13, 2010 02:25 PM (puRnk)
Posted by: eman at February 13, 2010 02:25 PM (4tixt)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 13, 2010 02:27 PM (Iyz0f)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 13, 2010 02:29 PM (Iyz0f)
So it IS warming, you stupid inbred cousin-humping ignorant fascists!!!
Posted by: Typical EcoWhacko at February 13, 2010 02:30 PM (OkT2m)
How does one learn how to use, clean and store a gun? You just learn to do it, you educate yourself. Even getting 90% compliance will not be easy. But consider... 10% of a nation 300 million strong is 30 million. You can be one of that 10%. No one has to take this sitting down.
Posted by: George Orwell at February 13, 2010 06:00 PM (LSqh5)
You're fooling yourself. First of all, maintaining a weapon is like riding a bike. Once you learn how to do it you know it forever. To stay ahead of the internet police you would have to constantly study to learn new tricks. I don't think 10% could do it, probably less than 1 in 20 could if they tried.
Posted by: fozzy at February 13, 2010 02:30 PM (ccEuN)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 13, 2010 02:36 PM (Iyz0f)
Posted by: dagny at February 13, 2010 02:37 PM (YstLF)
Holeee Shit!! A whole new shtick! Internet Predator II!!
Posted by: Brian Ross at February 13, 2010 02:38 PM (KGJlV)
It would take a lot of effort to get out in front of this and stay there, forever.
Eventually you would screw up and get caught (and be prosecuted with the same vigor child pornographers are because people like YOU allow evil to happen - don't be surprised if a few terms get redefined in the popular culture along the way to make your prosecution seem reasonable) or you'd just get tired and give up and comply.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at February 13, 2010 02:39 PM (F09Uo)
NG, how is the grilled stuff? I can't break my habit of Original Recipe....
Posted by: TXMarko at February 13, 2010 02:41 PM (KGJlV)
I hate that original stuff, why I never went there at all, but this grilled is just perfect!
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 13, 2010 02:43 PM (Iyz0f)
Posted by: dagny at February 13, 2010 02:43 PM (YstLF)
remember when we were trying to figure out if Obama and fellow travelers were communists, socialists or statists> did we ever figure it out?
gps- cell phone for gvt, eeze, U.N. given rights here, licensing to make all your internet experiences awesome as hell, Interpol, joe the plumber?
did anyone ever read Obama's "The Global Poverty Act" his piece of legislation in 2007
Posted by: willow is pe'ode at February 13, 2010 02:45 PM (7FgWm)
Extortionate and confiscatory taxes wherever they turn on virtually everything they earn, purchase, or do, from the local level on up to the federal level;
• Myriad regulations, controls and arbitrary rules that hamper or obstruct their productivity and their lives;
• Footing the endless bills of earmarked pork barrel projects at home in the amount of billions;
• Footing the bill in the amount of the billions for bottomless altruist and "humanitarian" pork barrel projects abroad;
• Footing the bill for an ever-expanding and ever more costly welfare state to subsidize the ill, the retired, the aged, the young, etc.
• Being held hostage by, say, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and other hostile "oil-producing" countries, because our government has decided that snail darters, sea cows, and caribou have a greater right to live than have human beings;
• Paying more for food because mandated ethanol, which reports prove costs more in oil to produce than it "saves," in the gas they buy is taking more crop acreage out of production
@Capitalism Magazine april 2008
Posted by: willow is pe'ode at February 13, 2010 02:46 PM (7FgWm)
Posted by: madamex at February 13, 2010 02:47 PM (5zI55)
Posted by: willow is pe'ode at February 13, 2010 02:49 PM (7FgWm)
Posted by: dagny at February 13, 2010 02:49 PM (YstLF)
Yeah Chairman Soetoro gets information control without our having any directly elected oversight on this assault on the first amendment. The internet belongs to the American people it was bought with taxpayer funding and the architecture was built using primarily US funds. It is simply SMASHING that we are now going to be muzzled by the modern equivalent of the Star Wars cantina.......
Remember kids the PATRIOT ACT was a HUGE assault on the first amendment doesn't anyone else remember the government controlled truth squads that were muzzling Chris Tingle and Olberdork?
//moonbat
Posted by: sven10077 at February 13, 2010 02:52 PM (fhezT)
Posted by: Mark Steyn's Audi TDI-Driving Milksop at February 13, 2010 02:53 PM (HjPtV)
dagny, i hadn't heard the gey part.
someone dropped this info a couple of days ago
http://tinyurl.com/yjpupsp (newsmax)
Barack and Hasan showed up at the house in a BMW, and then we went to a restaurant together,” Drew says. “We had a nice meal, and then we came back to the house and smoked cigarettes and drank and argued politics.”
For the next several hours, they discussed Marxism.
“He was arguing a straightforward Marxist-Leninist class-struggle point of view, which anticipated that there would be a revolution of the working class, led by revolutionaries, who would overthrow the capitalist system and institute a new socialist government that would redistribute the wealth,” says Drew, who says he himself was then a Marxist
Posted by: willow is pe'ode at February 13, 2010 02:55 PM (7FgWm)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 13, 2010 06:00 PM (LSqh5)
Hey, I don't make the news, I just report it. Most people don't care and will never care. 52% of them voted American Idol into the Presidency DESPITE the fact that everything they needed to know about him was out there.
Without 90% of those sources how do you tell people that Oceana has NOT been at war with Eastasia? They will just give you a funny look and mutter something about tinfoil hats.
Posted by: Sharrukin at February 13, 2010 02:56 PM (593B8)
Posted by: Indy at February 13, 2010 02:59 PM (iDOIJ)
Posted by: willow is pe'ode at February 13, 2010 03:00 PM (7FgWm)
Glad to see he was as down with the class struggle then as he is now.
One more thought on the idea of Internet licenses; such a move would probably be the death knell of P2P file sharing (and copyright infringement). Think Dr. Utopia's Hollywood buddies would be on board?
Posted by: Winston Smith, Appalled by WOW Geeks at February 13, 2010 03:00 PM (BFqyO)
Posted by: w'evver at February 13, 2010 03:02 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: Barry Obama at February 13, 2010 03:03 PM (QECjC)
I am unclear, but I THINK she fired it three times and only one blast hit her brother. Presumably, the rest went into a wall somewhere. Would be interesting to have a look at the wall, I guess.
In any case, it does not look much like an accident. Three shots? Nope, not from a properly functioning semi-auto.
Posted by: Popcorn at February 13, 2010 03:06 PM (OOehk)
Posted by: eman at February 13, 2010 03:07 PM (4tixt)
Posted by: willow is pe'ode at February 13, 2010 07:00 PM (7FgWm)
It was a triple-barrel shotgun, smartypants.
Posted by: Rep. Wm. Delahunt at February 13, 2010 03:07 PM (1fanL)
250 wow Popcorn, the gun accidently shot her brother 3 times?
It's even worse, she left the house and tried to carjack people at gunpoint and was apprehended by cops drawing guns.
Posted by: madamex at February 13, 2010 03:10 PM (5zI55)
Posted by: Scrapiron at February 13, 2010 03:12 PM (1kwr2)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at February 13, 2010 03:12 PM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: mrp at February 13, 2010 03:13 PM (HjPtV)
Weird, but hardly surprising. This is the state that regularly returned Scuba Ted to the Senate even after his short but eventful stint as a submarine commander.
Posted by: Popcorn at February 13, 2010 03:14 PM (OOehk)
Posted by: madamex at February 13, 2010 03:14 PM (5zI55)
"how do you exshpect a cassssshter to tank a blood prinssssh with negative dodge? oh my god oh my god"
And the next line:
"I'm gonna have a heart attack!"
Yes. Yes, you are. Without a doubt. But can you really blame Warcraft for that?
Posted by: Bender Bending Rodriguez at February 13, 2010 03:16 PM (+PfVy)
FYI: Did you know Delahunt won his first election by contesting it?
It's true. He demanded a recount and lo! won by a handful of votes.
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at February 13, 2010 03:16 PM (PaMcq)
Posted by: madamex at February 13, 2010 03:18 PM (5zI55)
Hmm, Unclefacts? That was all just gibberish to me, how is it that you knew what he was talking about? Inquiring minds want to know.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 13, 2010 03:18 PM (1fanL)
It's true. He demanded a recount and lo! won by a handful of votes.
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at February 13, 2010 07:16 PM
(PaMcq)
So now you wingnuts aren't just against science, you're against math too?
Posted by: Rep. Wm. Delahunt at February 13, 2010 03:19 PM (1fanL)
They can have my keyboard when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.(OK, enough with the Smart Thermostats)
If I wasn't at this computer I'd probably be at a Tea Party organizational meeting, not that the two are mutually exclusive but one takes more time and effort than the other.
Which is it going to be, totalitarian douche suckers?
DO YOU WANT ME AT YOUR DOORSTEP THROWING TWISTY LIGHTBULBS AT THE SIDE OF YOUR OFFICE?
What kind of press would that make?
"Disgruntled Tea Partier Creates Toxic Zone around Representatives Office using Legislatively Mandated New Light Bulbs!!11!!1!
Posted by: Speller at February 13, 2010 03:20 PM (o0R2E)
This is the freakiest thing I've read in a LONG time. Think these guys are morons?
http://tinyurl.com/yzfehh7
Can you say bizarre?
Posted by: Kemp at February 13, 2010 03:26 PM (2+9Yx)
Hmm, Unclefacts? That was all just gibberish to me, how is it that you knew what he was talking about? Inquiring minds want to know.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 13, 2010 07:18 PM (1fanL)
on advice of counsel, I have decided to invoke my privileges as set forth under the fifth amendment
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 03:27 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: sj at February 13, 2010 03:28 PM (p9ZXF)
Posted by: Popcorn at February 13, 2010 07:12 PM (OOehk)
Vindication!!!11!!!1!! I expect a written apology from you science-hating wingnuts.
Posted by: Rep. Wm. Delahunt at February 13, 2010 03:29 PM (1fanL)
"Barney Frank excepted. That is not something I even want to contemplate."
Speak for yourself.
Posted by: Andrew "Buttered Glutes" Sullivan at February 13, 2010 03:30 PM (FU75b)
Thanks, #273. And to think I was going to make Indian Butter Chicken on jasmin rice for dinner tonight.
Bleh!
Posted by: Speller at February 13, 2010 03:38 PM (o0R2E)
Posted by: sj at February 13, 2010 07:28 PM (p9ZXF)
To maintain consistency, we need to enact license requirements for printing presses and writing in general.
FOR THE CHILDREN!
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at February 13, 2010 03:39 PM (F09Uo)
Time to take down another Dem house member, and now. The police chief at the time defends his actions by saying they turned "the inquiry over to the district attorney" who, at the time, was Delahunt!!! NYT couldnt get a comment out of his office.
Here's the money quote
“Everything was done that should have been done under the circumstances,” Mr. Polio said in a phone interview. “She was questioned, and then turned over to her mother. The determination was made that we were going to turn the inquiry over to the district attorney.”
The District Attorney at the time was William Delahunt, a Democrat, who is now a Congressman. Messages left for Mr. DelahuntÂ’s spokesman were not immediately returned.
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter at February 13, 2010 03:40 PM (5r0Tz)
Posted by: Central Scrutinizer - Davos 2.0 edition at February 13, 2010 03:46 PM (RfEaZ)
Posted by: Bill R. at February 13, 2010 03:50 PM (EhlQq)
Posted by: Central Scrutinizer - Davos 2.0 edition at February 13, 2010 07:46 PM (RfEaZ)
Also, Double And Triple Posts Will Not Be Tolerated !
Posted by: The Ministry Of Information at February 13, 2010 03:51 PM (t72+4)
Color me intrigued.
Oh, and "bespoke" means "insanely expensive," right?
Posted by: Winston Smith, Intrigued by Three Barrels at February 13, 2010 03:53 PM (BFqyO)
Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at February 13, 2010 03:54 PM (6hnWk)
Hi, Wingnut-Come-Lately, we've already established my complete innocence of any wrong-doing in this matter.
Good DAY, sir!
Posted by: Rep. Wm. Delahunt at February 13, 2010 03:54 PM (1fanL)
Wasting Bandwidth, Helps A Soldier In East Asia !
Report Bandwith Leechers At Your Local Ministry Office.
Oceania Depends on You !
Posted by: The Ministry Of Information at February 13, 2010 03:54 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: Bill R. at February 13, 2010 07:50 PM (EhlQq)
CB's didn't have to log on to broadcast, and things like the Carnivore and NarusInsight software programs didn't exist.
Posted by: Sharrukin at February 13, 2010 03:56 PM (593B8)
Here ya go
Not that I support it - just demonstrating that your typical lefty journalist it.
Posted by: chemjeff at February 13, 2010 03:56 PM (Gk/wA)
2 Girls Are Sharing 1 Cup Right Now And Sacrificing For Their Country.
What Are You Doing Brother ?
Posted by: The Ministry Of Information at February 13, 2010 04:02 PM (t72+4)
Here's what I want to know. What does this stupid bitch have against the Haiti earthquake victims?
God, do these assholes ever stop to think about consequences?
Posted by: FUBAR at February 13, 2010 04:04 PM (1fanL)
2 Girls Are Sharing 1 Cup Right Now And Sacrificing For Their Country.
What Are You Doing Brother ?
Posted by: The Ministry Of Information at February 13, 2010 08:02 PM (t72+4)
gagging?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 13, 2010 04:05 PM (erIg9)
Oh god, that's funny, because it is literally true.
Posted by: Nemo from Erewhon at February 13, 2010 04:06 PM (57N+j)
Not that I support it - just demonstrating that your typical lefty journalist it.
Posted by: chemjeff at February 13, 2010 07:56 PM (Gk/wA)
Some people would sell their soul for a day old twinkie. How do people get that trusting of government?
Posted by: Sharrukin at February 13, 2010 04:06 PM (593B8)
Oui. Special order firearms are wonderful things but not usually found in the hands of Massachusetts teenagers who are angry at their brothers.
Posted by: Popcorn at February 13, 2010 04:08 PM (OOehk)
Posted by: Central Scrutinizer - Davos 2.0 edition at February 13, 2010 04:14 PM (RfEaZ)
Posted by: Central Scrutinizer - Davos 2.0 edition at February 13, 2010 04:16 PM (RfEaZ)
Posted by: Central Scrutinizer - Davos 2.0 edition at February 13, 2010 04:19 PM (RfEaZ)
CB's didn't have to log on to broadcast, and things like the Carnivore and NarusInsight software programs didn't exist. Posted by: Sharrukin at February 13, 2010 07:56 PM (593B
Umm, yes the CB'ers DID have to "log on". You were required to broadcast your callsign at the beginning and end of your conversations...
Posted by: TXMarko at February 13, 2010 05:01 PM (KGJlV)
And if you didn't? Could you still broadcast? How much effort would it have taken on their part to find you if you didn't pay your licence fee? That is the issue.
Posted by: Sharrukin at February 13, 2010 05:14 PM (593B8)
1) This is standard for the console industry ever since Nintendo revived it in the mid-80s. You sell the hardware at break even because the big money is in the software. The more machines in the installed base, the more copies of a title can be sold. The consumer preferably (leaving aside things like RROD or the prone to death by overheating PS1) only buys one unit of the console but could potentially buy dozens of games over the platform's lifetime, so limiting the installed base is working against yourself.
Microsoft and Sony pushed hard on the bleeding edge technology, making for very expensive machines that would be too costly at a break-even price. Thus they're sold at a loss. Nintendo avoided this by making the Wii a minor upgrade of their previous generation's hardware (die shrink for lower cost chips at higher clock rate and more RAM added). This meant not supporting HDTV but the bet worked by focusing on the new controller tech instead.
So, Microsoft isn't doing anything out of the ordinary for the console business by losing money on the base hardware.
2) I defy you to find a consumer OS that has had significantly less security hole identified than Windows. It doesn't exist. The difference is that everything other than Windows has such minuscule market share it isn't attractive to malware makers to target those machines. This isn't kids looking for ego boost anymore. It's a big business and the numbers matter.
3) In case you hadn't noticed, the Zune comes in other colors than brown. Nor is Microsoft alone in having a hard shaking Apple's hold on the personal audio player market. I wouldn't buy an iPod. They're overpriced and I detest the ill-behaved iTunes. But fashion matters more than function in the consumer world. The same with DVRs. The brand name TiVo has become synonymous with DVR for most consumers, as if other choices never existed. RePlayTV has better image quality, no encryption of the files, and better options (like a real 100 megabit ethernet port when TiVo only offered USB 1.0) all around but TiVo won on style. Such is life and business.
4) Near total ownership of the OS and productivity application markets? Yeah, I wish I could fail like that. Why don't you ask yourself why, if Microsoft sucks so much, Apple is still in single digits for the PC market and Linux barely merits mention? Apple doesn't want it because it requires doing stuff they find boring and unglamorous, while the Linux crowd doesn't get it when it comes to working with normal humans.
It isn't as though Microsoft doesn't already do a lot of business with the military. There is a fair amount of MS code used at the DOD that exists solely at their behest. But asking Microsoft to take a big loss on a deal like this is hardly a reasonable request. Most contractors have a bad track record just coming in on budget. Being asked for freebies won't fly.
Mundie really blew it on this one. Everybody who has ever worked in IT or just had to be the family tech support guy has had inner fantasies of denying large portions of the population access to computers or use of the internet. The frustration from dealing with people who are willfully ignorant or apparently incapable of learning despite seeming to function well elsewhere in life, that frustration inspires the worst in us. Much as those who have contempt for the average member of the species may be attracted to Marx and leftism, in the belief that elites who know better should run everything.
Living up to a belief in liberty for all is a never-ending test.
Posted by: epobirs at February 13, 2010 05:19 PM (NXCBg)
It's our fault. We haven't properly trained our dogs.
Posted by: MarkD at February 13, 2010 05:24 PM (0FVgz)
That 'callsign' wasn't an official government designation. Burt Reynolds' movie character didn't register with the DMV or FCC as 'the Bandit.' This wasn't ham radio. This was citizen's band. The cost of admission was paid at Radio Shack and nothing more was required.
To put it in modern terms, I don't have to tell the government what SSID I choose to use on my WiFi access point. In fact, there isn't anyone in the government willing to listen, because they don't supervise that stuff. Now, if I wanted to operate in the portion of the spectrum used by cell phone carriers, that would be a different situation. The government will be very interested in coming over to your house, if your neighbors don't beat you to death first.
Posted by: epobirs at February 13, 2010 05:24 PM (NXCBg)
My wife's netbook has a built-in webcam.
I suppose the next requirement will be to have that camera on at all times, just to record who is posting on the 'net.
Time to resurrect a 60's chant:
"Two Four Six Eight" Organize and Smash the State"
Posted by: effinayright at February 13, 2010 06:04 PM (U/ul8)
Some people would sell their soul for a day old twinkie. How do people get that trusting of government?
Oh they don't trust the government. Not really. See we raise a shitstorm because we see this as it really is. These guys would raise a shitstorm if the government was currently controlled by people that get and R after their name. No the only reason they are trusting is because their fellow travelers are the ones in charge. Its not government its that they feel they are in the protected class and won't have any problem because they are 100% in agreement with the guys.
Posted by: buzzion at February 13, 2010 06:48 PM (oVQFe)
Actually, that is not correct. Currently, there are no registration requirements for Citizens Band transmissions. Back in the '70s, registration with the FCC was required. While the FCC was not going to try to track down folks who had not registered, it was an extra charge to lay onto those who chose to operate pirate radio and Linear amps on CB frequencies.
Posted by: TXMarko at February 13, 2010 07:18 PM (KGJlV)
The day is rapidly approaching when twits like these, advocates for licences on the internet, are put up against a wall during the Revolution.
To say I'm sick of the nanny-staters and the totalitarian wanna-bes is beyond repetitive.
Posted by: memomachine at February 13, 2010 07:40 PM (lSfPU)
Posted by: whiskey at February 13, 2010 08:33 PM (L03mw)
Posted by: SGT Dan at February 14, 2010 01:06 AM (KLFGv)
Posted by: Robin at February 14, 2010 04:07 AM (PYwaz)
Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at February 14, 2010 05:30 AM (bSzpw)
Any takers for the execution of sentence?
Posted by: GamerFromJump at February 14, 2010 10:45 AM (LYdrC)
Posted by: Cack Finger at February 14, 2010 09:38 PM (TUBcJ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3127 seconds, 441 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Vic at February 13, 2010 12:30 PM (QrA9E)