November 24, 2010
— Open Blogger Last year, Obama was criticized for not taking the lead on health care reform. After Scott Brown's election in Massachusetts, Obama's involvement in the negotiatons evaporated. At one point, even Al Franken took David Axlerod aside to ask why the Whitehouse wasn't doing more to help. Franken joined Bernie Sanders and Sherrod Brown in public criticism of the Whitehouse role. That was around the time Obama turned over health care reform to Nancy Pelosi for the most part.
Now for delegation of leadership, part II. A while back, the Whitehouse charged Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson with discovering what could be done about the debt/deficit. Obama made them co-chairs of the bi-partisan Debt Commission. Good so far. But since the time of their November 10th draft proposal, liberals and conservatives alike have been grousing, since both spending cuts and tax increases have been proposed. On the plus side, there has been scant praise--which is better than no praise. What is a politican like Obama to do? Well, he could duck and cover like he did when Scott Brown was elected.
Yet missing from the conversation in any kind of forceful way has been the president himself. When former Senator Simpson and Mr. Bowles, President Clinton's former chief of staff, put out their draft plan (in a surprise move three weeks before the final report's Dec. 1 due date), Obama was in Asia. A spokesman said he would wait for the final report before commenting.Obama's Nov. 13 radio address did take a baby step toward committing on fiscal matters: In addressing earmarks, he spoke of putting "our country on the path of fiscal discipline and responsibility."
But Obama probably can't rely on others to do the heavy lifting. Few observers expect the fiscal commission to reach the supermajority needed – 14 out of 18 members, most of them politically sensitive members of Congress – to approve a final report. That means Congress is likely not to face a vote on its recommendations.
But final report or not, Obama has an opportunity to demonstrate leadership on a matter of central national importance. Dec. 1 "should mark the handing of the torch to the president to start running with this issue," says Maya MacGuineas, director of the Fiscal Policy Program at the New America Foundation in Washington.
The proposal has many worthwhile elements. For example, federal payroll would be cut by 10%. The spending cuts in the plan amount to twice the debt/deficit reduction as do the tax increases.
A week after the Debt Commission released its draft proposal, another bi-partisan committee headed by Alice Rivlin and Pete Domenici released a even tougher proposal. But I'm suspicious of a plan that introduces a federal sales tax without replacing the income tax. Regardless, there are many avenues toward reducing the debt/deficit--many excellent bits and pieces in these plans--and it is looking like Obama will again be AWOL. He's missing an excellent opportunity to take the lead and cobble together a workable plan from these parts. Maybe he could put Nancy Pelosi on it.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
10:23 AM
| Comments (38)
Post contains 528 words, total size 3 kb.
It may be the only piece of wisdom he knows, but even BHO has figured out "it's better to stand silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 24, 2010 10:28 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Journolist at November 24, 2010 10:29 AM (LwLqV)
I'm really not sure that it is. Unless they go through very extreme contortions, a VAT really does hit the poor disproportionately hard. Enter a Republican ad campaign: "We'll repeal the VAT."
If they were good (but they're the GOP so they're not) they could even imply a full return to the Government Cheese while really planning to implement a Flat Tax.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 24, 2010 10:34 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 24, 2010 10:34 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: ford the IINO. Independent in name only at November 24, 2010 10:34 AM (Ki7fm)
I don't think this is anywhere near enough. The government has been on a hiring orgy since at least after the 2006 election.
I'd like to see a budget reduction for all federal departments to at least 2006 levels.
The private sector has been hemorrhaging jobs and has had few raises since the Democrats took congress - its time for federal employees to share the pain.
Posted by: 18-1 at November 24, 2010 10:36 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: ford the IINO. Independent in name only at November 24, 2010 10:37 AM (Ki7fm)
BFS, that panel was a joke. 2/3 Democrat commies and 1/3 RINOs. There was never any intent to do anything but raise taxes. Any spending cuts that were to be made would be cosmetic bullshit that would be done at "some time down the road".
That is the way the lying commiecrats always work.
Here is what needs to happen:
1. Fire the panel
2. Write a budget for next year that starts at the last Republican congress year. That was a deficit but it was less than 25% of the deficit we are running now.
3. Every department in the gov then cuts their budget to match what it was then.
4. Write the next budget for the following year. This time in individuyal department budgets. In this one entire departments get the ax. This at the same time that departments that are kep are maintained at that 2007 budget level.
5. Keep doing that until the budget is balanced.
Posted by: Vic at November 24, 2010 10:37 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: ford the IINO. Independent in name only at November 24, 2010 10:41 AM (Ki7fm)
Since he came to Washington in 2006 the deficit has gone from $450B to $1.5T.
The guy has already added to the debt more then 3x the cost of the WoT, which, IIRC, formerly incensed the left...
Posted by: 18-1 at November 24, 2010 10:42 AM (7BU4a)
This Panel is also looking at the Military Retirement system... they want to vest at 10 years, but not allow you any payments until 60... and allow you to do the Government Fed employee system, but not match any funds...
They are also looking at Military Retired Health Insurance... trying to save money...
Notice how this has not made any papers, or websites, outside of a few Military places?
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 24, 2010 10:42 AM (AdK6a)
Today's Contestant:
Vet, 77, Busted For Obama Death Threat
Wanted to shoot president for “what he has done to this country”
So... Liberal or Conservative.
...
...
...
Dingdingding!
If you said "Liberal" please collect your prize!
"...told a nurse that he “was thinking of traveling to Washington, DC, to shoot the President (Obama) because he is not doing enough to help African Americans,”"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 24, 2010 10:44 AM (8y9MW)
One thing about this whole "Panel"...
Don't we pay CONGRES to do this Job? Are there not huge Staffs? and the CBO? Who are the ones who are supposed to be doing the BUDGET?
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 24, 2010 10:44 AM (AdK6a)
You can't ever trust Democrats. You can't ever vote for them. They can't be trusted, they don't care if it all goes to hell.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 24, 2010 10:44 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 24, 2010 10:49 AM (PaSAU)
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 24, 2010 10:49 AM (GgQ/l)
That was his M.O. at Harvard Law Review, the Illionois State Senate, the US Senate, and his 22 months in the Oval Office
Posted by: kbdabear at November 24, 2010 10:54 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 24, 2010 02:49 PM (GgQ/l)
Yeah... I could not figure out why the Repubs did not make a HUGE deal about Congress not doing ANY of the Budget Bills this year... It should have been a HUGE election issue...
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 24, 2010 10:55 AM (AdK6a)
Unbelievable.
Posted by: GW McLintock at November 24, 2010 10:57 AM (eAP/l)
In many ways, it should have been THE election issue. Congress failed to do its single most important constitutional duty: Provide a budget for the next year.
I personally think that every Democrat should have lost their office just for that.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 24, 2010 10:57 AM (8y9MW)
King Barry's modis operandi on anything like this through his life has been to let a committee do all the negotiation and work while he's out doing deep thinking or something on the golf course. He then shows up at the end and grabs the glory and tells the world what an awesome job he did.
Hey! Deep thinkers have to spend a lot of time on the links. So they can get their job done.
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 24, 2010 11:01 AM (GgQ/l)
Posted by: John Galt at November 24, 2010 11:26 AM (F/4zf)
This Panel is also looking at the Military Retirement system... they want to vest at 10 years, but not allow you any payments until 60... and allow you to do the Government Fed employee system, but not match any funds...
They are also looking at Military Retired Health Insurance... trying to save money...
Notice how this has not made any papers, or websites, outside of a few Military places?
I fully expect them to try and kill the military retirement system completely.
Posted by: Alex at November 24, 2010 11:50 AM (yY28H)
I fully expect them to try and kill the military retirement system completely.
Posted by: Alex at November 24, 2010 03:50 PM (yY28H)
Don't know if they can pull that off... but the "plan" is to make it so you can't collect ANY of it until you hit at least 60 years of age... and I'm sure they will then raise the age after that...
Funny how they are going after MILTARY retirement, yet there have been NO reports anywhere about looking at the rest of the Government employees salaries, or retirement.... guess the military is out of luck because they don't have a Union...
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 24, 2010 11:55 AM (AdK6a)
What rips my ass is how any American with even a smidgen of a brain can ever vote for a Democrat.
Posted by: Vic at November 24, 2010 12:07 PM (e4sSD)
Posted by: joeindc44 at November 24, 2010 01:00 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: joeindc44 at November 24, 2010 01:01 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: A.G. at November 24, 2010 01:23 PM (aLf2F)
Posted by: A.G. at November 24, 2010 01:26 PM (aLf2F)
Funny how they are going after MILTARY retirement, yet there have been NO reports anywhere about looking at the rest of the Government employees salaries, or retirement....
That's probably because they did a huge overhaul of the federal retirement system about 20 years ago. Of course that means 15-20 years before you see the impact of that, since everyone retiring now is still on the old CSRS system, as opposed to the more recent FERS, which is basically a 401K.
Posted by: Laughingdog at November 24, 2010 01:42 PM (cqZXM)
Welcome to our website
===== http://www.1shopping.us/ =======
accept paypal and free shipping
We need your support and trust!!!
Dear friends, please temporarily stop your footsteps
To our website Walk around A look at
Maybe you'll find happiness in your sight shopping heaven and earth
You'll find our price is more suitable for you.
And we shall be offer you free gift about MP4 if you more order.
===== http://www.1shopping.us/ ========
Posted by: xixi at November 27, 2010 02:52 PM (TrVxe)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2578 seconds, 166 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Alex at November 24, 2010 10:27 AM (yY28H)