February 07, 2010
— Dave in Texas Doesn't want to jeopardize (however that's spelled) the Dem ticket.
Announcing his decision at a Chicago bar packed with patrons watching the Super Bowl, a tearful Scott Lee Cohen said the Democrats were not certain they could win with him on the ticket. He said he was stepping down because he did not want to jeopardize the Democratic Party ticket.
It's that middle name thing. Just tweaks you wrong.
via HotAirpundit via comment by newser
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
07:09 PM
| Comments (235)
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Rage at February 07, 2010 07:21 PM (d7Px0)
The location and timing for Sunday's announcement — a heated beer garden at a Chicago bar during the Super Bowl — perplexed some patrons who were trying to watch the New Orleans Saints take on the Indianapolis Colts.
Snort.
Posted by: Mama AJ at February 07, 2010 07:22 PM (Be4xl)
Cohen's resignation from the ticket means state party leaders can replace him on the ballot.
"Now we can move on to find a strong replacement," said Steve Brown, spokesman for the Illinois Democratic chairman, House Speaker Michael Madigan.
Hello? Assholes? I finished second. WTF!?!?!?
Posted by: Arthur Turner at February 07, 2010 07:24 PM (yguwr)
I mean, can you imagine trying to watch the game and have a beer and some loser politician is babbling on, apologizing to his family and shit?
Posted by: Mama AJ at February 07, 2010 07:25 PM (Be4xl)
Well, if it were Obama announcing he was stepping down, I would LOVE IT.
Posted by: Waterhouse at February 07, 2010 07:28 PM (l8/vh)
How pathetic it must be to announce your withdrawal in bar packed with people just wanting to watch the Super Bowl.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 07, 2010 07:29 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: Doc at February 07, 2010 07:30 PM (rzJpR)
Posted by: Zimriel at February 07, 2010 07:31 PM (sVzRC)
Posted by: Scott Lee Cohen at February 07, 2010 07:32 PM (rzJpR)
Although I find it interesting about them having to point out that the woman's throat he put the knife to (allegedly) was a prostitute (allegedly).
Posted by: Tom in Korea at February 07, 2010 07:37 PM (nS7nk)
Posted by: Cicero at February 07, 2010 07:46 PM (SCFiZ)
Primaries in Illinois can be a little...er....messy, as well as expensive.
Oh, and Lisa announced that she wasn't making a run for the Senate a few days after the U.S. House had that Cap-and-Tax vote that Kirk voted for.
Nah. Nothing to see here.
Posted by: Gen. Sir Harry Flashman, VC at February 07, 2010 07:58 PM (wYKuO)
...he was crying because he picked Indianapolis to beat the spread.
Posted by: g at February 07, 2010 08:11 PM (phFNW)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 07, 2010 08:12 PM (5/yRG)
Why bother with primaries at all, then?
Posted by: Kensington at February 07, 2010 08:17 PM (BGpfF)
That's funny stuff. There used to be a morning radio show out of Greensboro, NC that featured a "Wayne Lee Ray" update. The hosts, who had been brought down to the Piedmont from up North, noted that an alarming number of perps in the police blotter would have either Wayne, Lee, or Ray as their middle name. So once a week they would note the Wayne Lee Ray middle named offenders. Incredible how many there were.
And hey, what do you know? The Dems in Illinois picked up on this - just a little late.
Posted by: Beta Phi at February 07, 2010 08:23 PM (fRnux)
Posted by: Boots at February 07, 2010 08:29 PM (06JTY)
Simple: to rehash the O'Keefe/Landrieu story, especially before charges are dropped.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 07, 2010 08:30 PM (Vo2Ef)
Actually Mike Madigan really is the leader of the democrat party in Illinois, he is chair of the Illinois Democratic State Central Committee, which IS the party.
Another name on the democrat ballot for Lt. Gov. last week was State Senator Ricky Hendon, who represents an area on the south side of Chicago, near the district which Obama used to represent in the IL state senate.
Hendon had worked for years on several pieces of legislation back when the state was run by corrupt republicans, and could not get them thru the legislature.
When the democrats took over when Blago got elected, Hendon's bills were taken away from him by his fellow democrat & new senate pres Emil Jones, and given to this unknown guy with the funny name - Obama.
That way Obama got the credit for the bills, even tho he put zero effort into them.
Posted by: Boots at February 07, 2010 08:32 PM (06JTY)
Maybe they could get Bill Ayers to run. He's clean and articulate. Not a trace of Negro elect, except in his books. Audacity of Opies hope and
Dreams of my friend Baracks father.
No felonies on his record.
Posted by: gus at February 07, 2010 08:41 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: curious at February 07, 2010 08:56 PM (p302b)
Posted by: American Elephant at February 07, 2010 08:59 PM (iFeh0)
Jeopardize?
Bad middle name?
I'll take "Guys who married 13- year-old jailbait" for five hunnert dollars, Alex.
Posted by: Jerry Lee Lewis at February 07, 2010 09:27 PM (lQRmV)
Posted by: ahem at February 07, 2010 09:31 PM (yO8ge)
20 Is there some secret to outfoxing Minx to get comments to post? I keep getting that message that my comment is annoying and I need to use the space bar more....where is the space bar & what do they serve?
Dude, you might as well ask God Almighty to lay it all out for you, about the Universe and what happens to you after you die, and stuff.
Ace and Minx don't give a fuck about your question. Ace only shits alongside Barak, John Kerry and the other Higher Beings. For them it comes out in little white puffs.
So he will not deign to answer.
Now go hit the tip jar and shaddap!!!
Posted by: effinayright at February 07, 2010 09:32 PM (lQRmV)
If you use a url it has to be small. Sometimes when you copy and paste you will pick up a url by accident.
Posted by: 18-1 at February 07, 2010 09:35 PM (bgcml)
Must another Obama-style leftist...
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at February 07, 2010 09:36 PM (8PFPH)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at February 07, 2010 11:12 PM (j7D30)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at February 07, 2010 11:12 PM (j7D30)
Sometimes when I copy and paste INTO TINY.URL and get a completely new URL it's still a "comment is annoying and I need to use the space bar more" issue?
Bollocks.
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave echoing Effinayright at February 07, 2010 11:28 PM (ZO7ND)
Maybe I meant "channelling"?
"recapitulating"?
Anyway, I have the same problem as him, if he's a "him," but him and me, we ain't the same guy.
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave nattering on at February 07, 2010 11:31 PM (ZO7ND)
Posted by: Roy at February 08, 2010 01:18 AM (U8RhD)
Posted by: Arsonist at February 08, 2010 02:10 AM (u37xD)
Posted by: Arsonist at February 08, 2010 02:11 AM (u37xD)
You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villany!
(Don't simply try to copy & paste from another web page; the meta-info sticks and counts as a single string of text. Open your Notepad and paste to there first. Edit it and then paste the text in the comment box here. If you want to put in a link, be sure to use TinyURL.com first. Highlight the text in the comment you wish to become a link to the reference webpage, click the 5th icon from the right above the comment box, paste the complete URL in the 2nd field, click apply, then ok. And then complete the comment by clicking 'Post'.)
Posted by: Iskandar at February 08, 2010 02:33 AM (/o58C)
"In a classically heirarchical structure, nobody benefits from passing only truthful communications. Contrariwise, everybody has an incentive to lie up, lie down, and lie sideways."
"The farther information travels vertically or horizontally, the less it resembles the real reality of the outside world."
"[Obama] is not self-reflective enough to realize the pickle he has gotten himself into; he does not comprehend how damaged his own communications have become."
"It is functionally insane."'
This info brought to ya morons as a public service cure for insomnia. Click the link for more.
http://biglizards.net/blog/archives/
2010/02/obamas_disinfor.html
Posted by: Looking Glass at February 08, 2010 02:39 AM (LJSfA)
Two big questions here: How was this shit bag able to win the primary to begin with and who pays for the IL primaries?
This turd could have only won the primary with the complicit aid of the "free press". Just like Obama they his the sins and promoted the wonderfulness of the commiecrat.
If the people of IL are paying for the primaries (as they do in some States) then the nomination of the candidates no longer belongs to the party. They can not just pull a candidate and replace him at will.
Theoretically what should happen is the IL Dem Party hold another primary and pay for themselves.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 02:43 AM (QrA9E)
http://fwd4.me/
Posted by: bill at February 08, 2010 02:51 AM (x49/7)
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at February 08, 2010 03:05 AM (j6H6o)
Posted by: Hannibal Lector at February 08, 2010 03:16 AM (4Kl5M)
Aren't there laws against impersonating an American let alone a president?
Posted by: sickinmass at February 08, 2010 03:30 AM (Dxfei)
At least it helps me get into work early.
Posted by: Al Gore at February 08, 2010 03:41 AM (V8B//)
I mean, can you imagine trying to watch the game and have a beer and some loser politician is babbling on, apologizing to his family and shit?
You could tell him to sit down and shut up, but then he might go off in a fit of roid rage and start assaulting women.
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 03:42 AM (t72+4)
Sounds like the episode of Star Trek where the Kirk and the crew of the Enterprise affects the outcome of an election on a faraway planet.
Wait...
Posted by: Jay in Ames at February 08, 2010 03:50 AM (LJaVO)
Ya' know I would have thought he would have held this press conference in the lounge of some Chicago area brothel being a big fan of hookers and all.
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 03:55 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Zombie Mayor Daley at February 08, 2010 03:57 AM (uTxQ4)
Ya' know I would have thought he would have held this press conference in the lounge of some Chicago area brothel being a big fan of hookers and all...
Someone calls you at 3:00 AM, who do you expect it to be?
My cadre of hookers - and they have better had a busy night if they know what's good for them - I'm running out of room in the yard where I bury the bodies.
Posted by: a moron named Lee at February 08, 2010 04:03 AM (Dxfei)
"Scary Scott Lee Cohen". First Jooo Cowboy/Bountyhunter.
"Fastest withDRAW West of the Mississipi".
Posted by: hutch1200 at February 08, 2010 04:23 AM (zU0HW)
"The Federal government is closed today in the National Capital Area."
"Please let me know if you notice."
Posted by: Looking Glass at February 08, 2010 04:34 AM (LJSfA)
Posted by: Jean at February 08, 2010 04:34 AM (CPefM)
Posted by: Pigs at February 08, 2010 04:40 AM (tJWxT)
Posted by: Crusty at February 08, 2010 04:41 AM (qzgbP)
Posted by: torabora at February 08, 2010 04:42 AM (VvJue)
Posted by: The Chicken at February 08, 2010 04:44 AM (VvJue)
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 04:44 AM (p302b)
Posted by: The Chicken at February 08, 2010 04:45 AM (VvJue)
Posted by: Rooster Cockburn at February 08, 2010 04:47 AM (4Kl5M)
69 The news guy just said there a rumors that the Gov of NY is considering not running for re election. ... So what happened that all of a sudden the rumors are that he might not run?
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 08:44 AM (p302b)
A Democrat is dropping out of a race. Gotta be a ho or a love child involved there somewhere.
Posted by: Crusty at February 08, 2010 04:48 AM (qzgbP)
Why step down? If you have a (D) behind your name - you are a perfect being. All of your D-crimes are understandable and forgiven. We will worship you regardless! Illinois heart corruption, mob-ties and spousal abuse (D).
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 08, 2010 04:48 AM (0fzsA)
The news guy just said there a rumors that the Gov of NY is considering not running for re election. Hmmmm didn't we hear that BO didn't want him to run but he said he was going to run anyway? So what happened that all of a sudden the rumors are that he might not run?
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 08:44 AM (p302b)
I saw a brief story the other day on some other site that said Patterson was busted a few days ago having a romantic dinner and holding hands at a NYC restaurant with a woman that was not his wife. That may have something to do with it Story may break in more detail later on today being the slow weekend news-cycle and the Capitol area being walloped by a blizzard.
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 04:51 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Tami at February 08, 2010 04:54 AM (VuLos)
Henry LEE Lucas
Jerry LEE Lewis
Only middle name worse is WAYNE
Posted by: R. D. Harhar at February 08, 2010 04:56 AM (lD4DZ)
It died down and now, 'for some reason', it's back again.
I saw something over the weekend where he had been caught "in the act" in a room in the gov mansion with a note that he and his wife werre known swingers.
I don't remember where I saw that at.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 04:58 AM (QrA9E)
Jerry LEE Lewis
When did Jerry Lee Lewis ever get convicted of beating and killing women? I thought his claim to infamy was marrying his young cousin.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 04:59 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2010 05:00 AM (UrTKp)
The Patterson story about he and a woman at a restaurant in NJ actually come out several weeks ago. It died down and now, 'for some reason', it's back again.
Posted by: Tami at February 08, 2010 08:54 AM (VuLos)
Just did a Google news search and it looks like the NYT, yes the NYT is about to drop a bombshell about him. I doubt it involves another woman being thats basically street cred with a Dem, plus Paterson is already on record as saying he and his wife sort of have an open relationship.
My guess is the Cuomo camp has dug some dirt up on him to get him to step down because thats the only way in hell I can see the NYT doing a story like that. Not to mention Obama does want him to run for re-election either so this is a double win for the NYT.
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 05:02 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Tami at February 08, 2010 05:02 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at February 08, 2010 05:02 AM (1Jaio)
Roland Burris still has room on his headstone for another title (and pension).
Posted by: d_Fitz at February 08, 2010 05:03 AM (mnrcy)
Obama does not want him to run for re-election either so this is a double win for the NYT.
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 09:02 AM (t72+4)
FIFMe
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 05:03 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: nine coconuts at February 08, 2010 05:04 AM (DHNp4)
Really? I know they both admitted to infidelity but I never heard that they admitted to an open relationship.
Posted by: Tami at February 08, 2010 05:05 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2010 05:06 AM (UrTKp)
Hey, if youÂ’re trapped in a room with your most recent ex for three days, what do you do?
I waited till the fuckers asleep and start king hitting like a chulo bitch gang banger till the arsehole feels like I did when the scunt dumped me.
Posted by: a Dem named Lee at February 08, 2010 05:10 AM (Dxfei)
Posted by: Ivan 'the Moderately Impressive' at February 08, 2010 05:11 AM (4Kl5M)
Really? I know they both admitted to infidelity but I never heard that they admitted to an open relationship.
Posted by: Tami at February 08, 2010 09:05 AM (VuLos)
At the time he admitted both he and his wife had previous affairs and from what I recall he stated that they were both so very comfortable in their relationship at the time that it wasnt a big deal. I took that as him saying they had an open relationship.
Evidently the story may also involve NY State troopers.
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 05:12 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Tami at February 08, 2010 09:05 AM (VuLos)
didn't see that coming? s'ok, neither did Paterson.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner. at February 08, 2010 05:13 AM (erIg9)
why would you have a note, in a room with you
LOL, I guess I need to go back for remedial English class. It has been over 40 years since I had any formal English training.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 05:14 AM (QrA9E)
BTW, the story I read over the weekend didn't say they had an "open relationship". It said they were "known swingers".
That is a horse of a different color.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 05:16 AM (QrA9E)
Jeopardize, jeopardy -- think of "leopard" and you'll never misspell it.
Unless you don't know how to spell leopard.
In the Internet Age, I'm not sure what excuses remain for not learning new things.
Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at February 08, 2010 05:17 AM (2QFX4)
He held an extraordinary news conference detailing past affairs that he and his wife were involved in during an 18-month period when it appeared their marriage would end.
Doesn't sound so much as open, as it was on the skids.
I have a feeling that Chicago style politics is being used to get him out of the race.
Posted by: Tami at February 08, 2010 05:18 AM (VuLos)
BTW, the story I read over the weekend didn't say they had an "open relationship". It said they were "known swingers".
That is a horse of a different color.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 09:16 AM (QrA9E)
Back when he had the press conference and admitted to the affairs, I recall him having a blase demeanor about the whole thing, laughing and cracking jokes the whole time. In other words he didnt seem too regretful or torn up about it. The New York social scene certainly is full of marriages of convenience and affairs are as normal as going to the health club for a lot of them, Caroline Schlossberg and Pinch Sulzberger is one that comes to mind.
However, the swinger thing is news to me. Perhaps he and his wife got trooper escorts to swinger parties or sex clubs?
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 05:24 AM (t72+4)
However, the swinger thing is news to me.
It could be BS as well. It was in a "story" at a news site which I do not remember which one it was.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 05:26 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Will Smith at February 08, 2010 05:26 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2010 05:27 AM (UrTKp)
Posted by: mrfixit at February 08, 2010 05:31 AM (Bsm1s)
Posted by: Jesus H. Christ at February 08, 2010 05:34 AM (6uiF7)
Posted by: CJ at February 08, 2010 05:39 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: mrfixit at February 08, 2010 05:39 AM (Bsm1s)
Posted by: zombie F. Lee Bailey at February 08, 2010 05:40 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: CJ at February 08, 2010 09:39 AM (9KqcB)
on CSPAN?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner. at February 08, 2010 05:40 AM (erIg9)
No one talking about Obama challenging the GOP to a televised session on health care?
Posted by: CJ at February 08, 2010 09:39 AM (9KqcB)
Nothing but Kabuki theater and a desperation move. He wants to draw the GOP into a gotcha moment and make them look like obstructionists before getting Reid to attempt the nuclear option.
"Ya' see I tried to work with them and reach across the aisle ,but they just dont want people to have healthcare no matter what so we had no choice."
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 05:43 AM (t72+4)
114 No one talking about Obama challenging the GOP to a televised session on health care?
Maybe everyone knows he's lying? Remember that Mr. Transparency promised the healthcare meetings would be televised. It's an Obama trap to peel off some RINO votes for Obamacare. I hope the Repubs don't fall for it, but you know how well the Repubs do public relations....
Oh well. In other bad news, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine is over and Iran's still on their merry way to producing nukes. At least in the end, there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 08, 2010 05:44 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: F. Lee Bailey at February 08, 2010 05:45 AM (4Kl5M)
No one talking about Obama challenging the GOP to a televised session on health care?
Had a post earlier on the ONT (open thread)
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 05:45 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: mrfixit at February 08, 2010 05:46 AM (Bsm1s)
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 05:46 AM (QrA9E)
122 will there still be coffee, with the chaos?? 'cause I need my coffee, damnit!
The only liquid that will be available after the onset of total chaos is your own tears. Enjoy.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 08, 2010 05:48 AM (9hSKh)
No one talking about Obama challenging the GOP to a televised session on health care?
And the Republicans should accept with Jim Coburn as the point man. Because nothing says "condescending" like lecturing a physician about health care.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 08, 2010 05:49 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: F. Lee Bailey at February 08, 2010 05:51 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at February 08, 2010 05:52 AM (6uiF7)
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 08, 2010 09:44 AM (9hSKh)
The GOP should have flat out refused. They have the overwhelming public sentiment and support on their side, the momentum and are winning already in the healthcare debate. they have nothing to gain from this. Obama said he wants to hear Republican idea's, but we all know thats bullshit because he's had over a year to hear them and for the most part Republicans have been shut out of committee on drawing legislation up. Tort reform and selling policies over state lines are the biggest two things you need and the Democrats will have none of it.
However he could have squishes like Snowe, Collins and Voinovich swooning in their seats as if he's serenading them.
Like the good Admiral said above, its a trap.
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 05:56 AM (t72+4)
"You really should try to type something." - Website Monitor
Sompin ,,,, er ...., somethin ...., er ..., something. How's that?
Posted by: Irked in Florida at February 08, 2010 06:00 AM (ITzbJ)
It took all weekend, but I finally found someone who said what cancer therapy was denied to Shouse in her terminal stage:
Shouse is now on her third round of chemotherapy to fight off the bone cancer and liver tumors. That treatment did not keep her from becoming bedridden for a month this spring. She was then given Avastin, a biologic therapy that costs $6,500 for a two-week supply. Since then she has been able to keep food down and "get off the couch." Her insurance provider has since sent her a letter saying it won't pay for Avastin.
From JustOneMinute
It was really bugging me.
Posted by: toby928 at February 08, 2010 06:00 AM (PD1tk)
My take on the Obama invite from the ONT;
Rise and Shine dayshift Morons a new day and a new week is here. I see I made 8 this week, halalulua that is the highest yet.
It appears that we will have two major topics from the news today that are holdovers from the weekend (not SB releated)
1. Sarah Palins performance at the TP convention and on Piss Wallace's show. I thought her performance at the convention was good but I was disappointed with her performace with the Fox commie and turned it off about 5 minutes into the take. She just let hin get away with too much crap related to "giving Obama credit" for crap he has thrown out there that are pure lies. One wonders if that is because she is now part of Fox or if commie Wallace's crew edited the tape and her answers.
2. The other topic will be the Obama invitation to speak to Republicans about healthscam to "get their ideas". This is a lose lose for the Republicans. It is nothing more than an effort to peal off some of the RINOs at the same time they get painted as the "party of no". My personal beleief is that the Republican leadership should take cahrge of that "party of no meme" and shove back up their asses by going on the offensive with it. We sat "no to nationalization, we say no to commuinsm, etc".
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 06:01 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 08, 2010 06:02 AM (0GFWk)
I want a cartoon of two huge teleprompters in the shape of hands.
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 08, 2010 06:05 AM (oT1aA)
Posted by: Holger at February 08, 2010 06:05 AM (8NGHm)
Other news on the Repub RINO front:
Labor Goon Up for confirmation in the Senate this week
His nomination is expected to go though without incident. (last paragraph in story)
We need the RINO gone;
Long time passing.
We need the RINOs gone;
Long time to go;
Weed need the RINOs gone;
They are OkÂ’ing commies everyone,
When will they ever learn;
When will they ever learn
No apologies to commie Seeger
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 06:05 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 06:06 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Jones at February 08, 2010 06:07 AM (JL3qV)
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 06:07 AM (p302b)
Obama NEVER once reached across the aisle to work with the Republicans in either the State Senate or the US Senate. He shut the door air tight on them in his first year in Office. To believe he wants to work with the opposition now is just rediculous. He was, is, and will always be just a Chicago hack.
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 08, 2010 10:02 AM (0GFWk)
Like I said, its nothing but Kabuki theater and the Republicans are stupid to go along with it. They won't allow CSPAN cameras into the real healthcare debates, but they have no problem allowing cameras from every news network into this dog and pony show in the hopes they can catch a Republican or two sticking their foot in their mouth and looking like the party of "No".
This issue is already dead and gone and the Republicans are helping to keep it alive by going along with it.
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 06:08 AM (t72+4)
Hm, When did Washington D.C. become a state?
"The Biggest Losers: 10 States That Aren't Getting Jack For Infrastructure Spending"
Washington, Virginia, Colorado, California, Ohio, Tennessee, Arizona, Michigan, Florida, North Carolina,
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 06:08 AM (p302b)
Is this a Recession or a Depression?
When the real unemployment hits 25% it will be the sane as "the Great Depression". We are approaching 20% now.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 06:12 AM (QrA9E)
Bertha Lewis in more trouble; resigns in a cloud of more investigations.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 10:10 AM (QrA9E)
This is shaping up to be a good week.
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 06:13 AM (t72+4)
OT: Hillbuzz is practically making love to Sarah Palin. Maybe they will remember she is against gay marriage, and most of what Hillary would support?
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 08, 2010 06:14 AM (oT1aA)
2. The other topic will be the Obama invitation to speak to Republicans about healthscam to "get their ideas". This is a lose lose for the Republicans. It is nothing more than an effort to peal off some of the RINOs at the same time they get painted as the "party of no". My personal beleief is that the Republican leadership should take cahrge of that "party of no meme" and shove back up their asses by going on the offensive with it. We sat "no to nationalization, we say no to commuinsm, etc".
They have to attend for the sake of appearances, but I'd answer any questions this way: "We're glad the president and the Democrats finally decided to allow us into the health care meetings, it's only about a year too late. This meeting was not about finding common sense solutions for the American people, it was a sham. The president and the Democrats had no intention of actually listening to us or considering ideas that we have had on the table for years, it was about the president and the Democrats trying to shove the current proposal down our throats with no changes. They have tried to bully us, they have tried to buy our votes like they have already done with other Democrat senators, we will have none of it. This is a bill that the American people have continually shown that they do not want, but the president and the Democrats don't care what the American people want. It was a nice made-for-TV meeting, but we are not going to sellout the American people, we are not going to compromise our principles, we are not going to vote for this bill. The end."
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 08, 2010 06:15 AM (sXLx/)
Posted by: Up Periscope at February 08, 2010 06:16 AM (ITzbJ)
Begin lecture mode:
In perusing other conservative sites I found one who had a thread going about the natural gas
explosion at the CT combined gas cycle plant under construction. The author of the thread opened the thread with words to the effect that “when ever I hear about an explosion at a power plant the first thought is whether or not it is a nuclear power plant”.
I am amazed that people are still falling into this ridiculous meme that was created by eco-idiots years ago. For those of you who are uneducated in the ways of commercial nuclear power let me say this one more time. People, it is physically impossible to have a nuclear explosion at a commercial nuclear power plant.
At the fire academy they have a specific definition for an “explosion” in order to differentiate explosions from other rapid fire events. To firemen, an explosion is a rapid oxidation-reduction reaction with a flame front that exceeds the speed of sound.
A nuclear detonation involves an extremely fast fission/fusion reaction (keff >>>> 1.0). These reactions produce energy as mass is lost in each (~ 200 MEV per fission) reaction. But to produce these reactions you must have highly enriched Uranium or highly enriched Plutonium (hence IranÂ’s work on enrichment).
The maximum enrichment in any commercial reactor is 5% and that is only in new assemblies in certain regions of the core (1/3 are changed out each refueling cycle). It is physically impossible to generate a nuclear detonation with an enrichment of 5%.
End of basic lecture
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 06:16 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 06:17 AM (p302b)
It's one of the only markets where job loss isn't an impact.
Posted by: WTFCI at February 08, 2010 06:17 AM (+zo63)
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 08, 2010 10:15 AM (sXLx/)
I agree, they need to say that are something very similar. The key is that they do not fold like a cheap suit and have a handful of the RINOs cross the aisle.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 06:18 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: katya at February 08, 2010 06:21 AM (iwUm8)
#146, you might be right, but if they "engage" Obama but don't budge on the essentials, that's actually good; you just fear they will do something RINO.
OT: Hillbuzz is practically making love to Sarah Palin. Maybe they will remember she is against gay marriage, and most of what Hillary would support?
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 08, 2010 10:14 AM (oT1aA)
What I fear is he'll offer them one or two things they really want and we'll get stuck with the other 10,000 things we really don't want. Maybe enough to peal away Snowe , Collins or Voinovich.
There is only one thing they need to say going into this:
"Mr. President, over 70% of Americans have already spoken and they want nothing to do with your healthcare reform because it isnt reform at all. The folks in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts have spoken the loudest. Now lets quit wasting time and move on to other business."
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 06:22 AM (t72+4)
This issue is already dead and gone and the Republicans are helping to keep it alive by going along with it.
Actually, keeping it alive might be worse for the Democrats. People by and large hate this bill and I believe polls show that they are far more concerned about the economy and jobs. Keeping this issue alive may make it appear that the president and the Democrats are far more interested in their pet project and less concerned with what voters actually care about. Combined with the poll numbers it makes the president and the Democrats look disconnected from reality. I think that a lot of congressional Democrats would rather have this issue disappear.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 08, 2010 06:22 AM (sXLx/)
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 08, 2010 10:15 AM (sXLx/)
This is why the dems/libs always get the better of you republican/conservatives. They know you are the eagle scouts, the good guys, so you will always "play well with others". Bo knew he could make that offer and the republicans like the spurned lover with no self esteem would come crawling back on their knees cause after all "it's the right thing to do". Just once I'd love to see republicans grow a pair, a couple of pairs and tell BO, "thanks but no thanks, for over a year our ideas have been out there, we have tried to talk to you guys, we have written letters, we have waited outside of meetings where the door remained closed to us, so now, now that you are about to totally fail, now you want us???? No thanks, we are not going to embarrass ourselves in front of the American people by showing we are a bunch of jellyfish, rather we are going to go out there and tell the American people that we hear them, they don't want any health care reform right now and we are listening which is why we ain't comin to the meetin....en masse as a block.
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 06:24 AM (p302b)
I think that a lot of congressional Democrats would rather have this issue disappear.
I think Pelosi is going to continue trying to push it through any means she can and the R's need to stay united.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 06:24 AM (QrA9E)
The only reactors I know of that can come close are naval reactors.
Posted by: Holger at February 08, 2010 06:24 AM (8NGHm)
Posted by: Open outer doors - fire one at February 08, 2010 06:24 AM (ITzbJ)
I favor nuclear power, but I am still unclear how, in a fail-safe manner, you get the rods away from each other when the cooling system fails (far enough away to stop the heat). Any thoughts?
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 08, 2010 06:24 AM (oT1aA)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 08, 2010 10:24 AM (oT1aA)
Pebble Bed Reactor.
Posted by: Holger at February 08, 2010 06:26 AM (8NGHm)
The flaky so called "Progressives" opposed to nuclear powere plants in this country should recognize that more people died in Teddy Kennedy's car than in all of the nuclear power plants that were ever built in this country.
Hey, now. Don't confuse the issue with facts. It feels right.
Posted by: katya at February 08, 2010 06:26 AM (iwUm8)
In addition, wrt to this health care issue, I'd also have the Republican leadership start banging on the economy and unemployment and ask why the president and the Democrats continue to ignore immediate problems like continuing job losses and unemployment while they are still hung up on a healthcare bill that Americans do not want. Pull a page out of the Clinton playbook: "It's the Economy, Stupid!"
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 08, 2010 06:27 AM (sXLx/)
I favor nuclear power, but I am still unclear how, in a fail-safe manner, you get the rods away from each other when the cooling system fails (far enough away to stop the heat). Any thoughts?
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 08, 2010 10:24 AM (oT1aA)
Do you dump the reactor full of cooling water or would that cause a steam explosion like at Chernobyl?
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 06:27 AM (t72+4)
It's one of the only markets where job loss isn't an impact.
Posted by: WTFCI at February 08, 2010 10:17 AM (+zo63)"
The RE blogs agree with your speculation. How the hell can the "public" servants understand anything going on in the rest of the country when they have their jobs, their perks, their unions, their retirement accounts intact and their homes, going up in value due to demand since they are hiring at the government? They are, in effect, in a protective bubble.
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 06:28 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 06:32 AM (p302b)
The only reactors I know of that can come close are naval reactors.
Can not discuss the stuff associated with those. As far as I know everything associated with the Naval Reactor Program is still classified.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 06:34 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Open outer doors - fire one at February 08, 2010 06:34 AM (ITzbJ)
Like I said, its nothing but Kabuki theater and the Republicans are stupid to go along with it.
This was what I was afraid of. Obama would call our bluff and we would chicken out.
What really concerns me is that Republicans in Congress don't have the backbone or knowledge to articulate 1. a conservative approach to health care and 2. why it's better than the Left's.
So, just like in the Bush years, they're not ready to govern.
Posted by: CJ at February 08, 2010 06:34 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: maddogg at February 08, 2010 06:34 AM (OlN4e)
In Popular Mechanics several years ago, there was an article about some guy out in Milwaukee (as I recall) who patented a miniature, nuclear powered engine that could be used in cars, trucks, lawn mowers and water pumps (as I recall). Wonder why we never heard anymore about that.
Posted by: Open outer doors - fire one at February 08, 2010 10:34 AM (ITzbJ)
I remember seeing something similar in OMNI magazine back in the late eighties.
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 06:36 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 08, 2010 06:38 AM (oT1aA)
I favor nuclear power, but I am still unclear how, in a fail-safe manner, you get the rods away from each other when the cooling system fails (far enough away to stop the heat). Any thoughts?
It would take a lot more space than what we should use up here to explain what happens when the “cooling system” fails (by that I assume you mean the design basis accident occurs where you have a rupture of the reactor coolant system, simultaneous with a loss of offsite power, and half of the emergency power systems fail to start on demand.)
Suffice to say that there are more than ample safety systems in place for that accident).
BTW, I am not a proponent of the Pebble Bed design.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 06:39 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: maddogg at February 08, 2010 06:40 AM (OlN4e)
Bo knew he could make that offer and the republicans like the spurned lover with no self esteem would come crawling back on their knees cause after all "it's the right thing to do".
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 10:24 AM (p302b)
You don't go because "it's the right thing to do," you go simply for the sake of appearances. You're going to get beaten up whether you go or don't go, so then you consider which of the options leaves you looking best with the average voter. The reality is that most people aren't deep thinkers when it comes to politics, so I say go to the meeting to make it look as if you are actually interested in a dialogue. You then come out of the meeting and say that going in you were hopeful that the president was actually interested in your ideas but you quickly realized that it was a waste of your time. He was only interested in making you accept his plan, which is a disaster that you will never vote for and which the American people do not want. And until the president and the Democrats are interested in common sense ideas that do work and that the American people do want, you will have no further discussions on the topic. And anyway, why is the president still wasting his time on this bill that Americans don't want when American workers are in the unemployment line and American businesses are collapsing? Wouldn't his time be better spent on finding real solutions for this economic crisis?
I like your idea but it appeals to hardcore folks. Most voters don't put that much effort into following politics or economics, and a lot of people are disgusted with the two party system. This whole deal is a sham designed to make the Republicans look obstructionist, I'd go to the meeting and then reverse the whip.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 08, 2010 06:41 AM (sXLx/)
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 10:27 AM (t72+4)
You are supposed to regulate coolant flow so that doesn't happen. Problems can crop up at both the high and low ends of flow rates.
Posted by: Holger at February 08, 2010 06:41 AM (8NGHm)
52% to be exact.
Posted by: Tami at February 08, 2010 06:43 AM (VuLos)
LOL OMNI. did it make it into the 1980's, yeah, guess so...talk about a wormhole to the past!
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 08, 2010 10:38 AM (oT1aA)
I loved that magazine, shame it had to go. The sci-fi short stories were pretty good and one of the best articles ever written in it was by G. Gordon Liddy on national security, terrorist attacks against our infrastructure and our porous borders. I was only about 16 or 17 at the time, but it really gave me goosebumps
Posted by: Blazer at February 08, 2010 06:44 AM (t72+4)
Do you dump the reactor full of cooling water or would that cause a steam explosion like at Chernobyl?
The "steam explosion" at Chernobyl was caused by a number of factors that are not physically possible in a U.S. design. They did in fact have a runaway reaction with a large Keff. That happened primarily because they viuolated every safety rule they had, their basic design allowed a positive moderator temperature coefficient, and their actual safety system design was not adequate to handle it, even if they had not defeated the safety system before the event.
Note that one of the local commisars is the one who had them doing all this.
Still, Chernobyle would hjave had no apreciable impact if it had been located in a concrete structure rather than a tin "Butler Building".
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 06:45 AM (QrA9E)
Can not discuss the stuff associated with those. As far as I know everything associated with the Naval Reactor Program is still classified.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 10:34 AM (QrA9E)
I know they use Highly Enriched Uranium (above 20 percent) but so do Fast Neutron Reactors which are also found in civilian applications.
Posted by: Holger at February 08, 2010 06:45 AM (8NGHm)
Posted by: fire three at February 08, 2010 06:46 AM (ITzbJ)
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 06:48 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 08, 2010 10:41 AM (sXLx/)
I don't think it matter much what the Republicans do or say, they are still going to be lambasted by the press. The Republicans at some point are going to have to learn how to deal with a hostile press without folding like a cheap suit from Belk's.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 06:50 AM (QrA9E)
It's when that whole letting people know what you really think that scares the shit out of them thing that it'ss kill em every time. heh heh
See the HC bil for instance.
Posted by: MelodicMetal in MA at February 08, 2010 06:51 AM (x4S2a)
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 06:51 AM (p302b)
Does Audi have some sort of magic diesel that is refined using less than the standard current 3 barrels of crude to get one barrel of deisel?
Posted by: WTFCI at February 08, 2010 06:51 AM (+zo63)
I know they use Highly Enriched Uranium (above 20 percent) but so do Fast Neutron Reactors which are also found in civilian applications.
There are no "fast neutron reactors" in commercial nuclear power. There is a small percentage of fast fission that occurs in the U-238 matrix but it is very small.
As I said earlier, I will not discuss naval design.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 06:52 AM (QrA9E)
This is shaping up to be a good week.
First, let us all give thanks that there were no wardrobe malfunctions during the half time show.
Posted by: Mama AJ, one of the cool kids at February 08, 2010 06:52 AM (Be4xl)
This is how Obama got elected when the other R candidate withdrew because of his divorce proceedings that were made public. Then Alan Keys ran against Obama and the rest is history.
I don't hear much about Chicago in the political scene, but when you do, it's usually pretty bad.
Posted by: ThackerAgency at February 08, 2010 06:52 AM (HhRUR)
Arthur Turner finished second.
Arthur Turner got almost 1/4 of the votes in a 6 way primary.
Arthur Turner got over 180,000 votes and lost by only 30,000.
Arthur Turner received 70,000 more votes than his nearest competitor.
Why hasn't Arthur Turner already been named as the nominee?
2 words... Race Ism.
Arthur Turner is black.
Posted by: Rocks at February 08, 2010 06:52 AM (Q1lie)
Personally I saw it as satire, with a twist of humor
Posted by: Mjim at February 08, 2010 06:53 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: Holger at February 08, 2010 06:53 AM (8NGHm)
Posted by: Mjim at February 08, 2010 10:53 AM (V8B//)"
Yes, of course, but going beyond that, it has everyone talking.
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 06:55 AM (p302b)
The Republicans at some point are going to have to learn how to deal with a hostile press without folding like a cheap suit from Belk's.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 10:50 AM (QrA9E)
How many years have people been saying this? It's almost like they have Stockholm syndrome and I think GW Bush was the worst about this. I recall Limbaugh's admonition to the freshmen Republicans in 1995: "Don't be fooled by these press people, they don't like you and their goal is to get you out of DC as fast as they can. Do what you were sent here to do and don't worry about what they say."
It's one of the things I like about Palin. She doesn't wuss out, she gives it back and seems to enjoy stomping on her critics' nads. That "Hi, Mom" thing on her hand was teh awesome.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 08, 2010 06:56 AM (sXLx/)
Here's what happened to Scott Lee Cohen. The Democrats were never going to elect him. He was set up to lose. He was set up to lose, but drop 3 mil of his own money around the Democratic Party scene. He was a good depositer for Dems, their consultants, their communication firms, etc.
They got all his money, but now they have his cloud. They will pretend they never knew anything about the cloud. They will be lying.
Posted by: WTFCI at February 08, 2010 06:57 AM (+zo63)
Posted by: maddogg at February 08, 2010 06:57 AM (OlN4e)
Go Audi! Personally I like their cars, so perhaps I'm biased.
Posted by: Mjim at February 08, 2010 06:58 AM (V8B//)
Your link to their website just put a bad taste in my mouth...
They really hit you over the head with their "saving the world" crap
It should say "Saving you money at the pump"
Posted by: Mjim at February 08, 2010 07:00 AM (V8B//)
Oh, and you can build a weapon with 20 percent enrichment but it'd be crude and inefficient with a low yield of a couple of kilotons.
The last thing I saw on that subject was in a book I checked out from the library. It said that the "experts" said 5 pounds of 95% enriched to make a weapons grade device capable of a detonation.
20% would most likely do nothing more than make a "fizzle" that polluted the area. Especially if done by some third world shithole like Iran.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 07:00 AM (QrA9E)
I sort of missed the story about Palin writing on her hand. Just followed an Instapundit link to the horrible nasty things the lefties are saying about her.
What ugly people.
Posted by: Mama AJ at February 08, 2010 07:01 AM (Be4xl)
And, that is so obvious to you right, but they failed to get that out there. I think maybe they are trying to appeal to that class of human, almost extinct, that may not care what they have to pay at the pump, trying to align themselves with those who have so much income, it doesn't matter.
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 07:02 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 08, 2010 10:56 AM (sXLx/)
I agree, except that I think Palin did fold in that Wallace interview yesterday, at least in the first 5 minutes.
OK, let me rephrase that, it "looked like she folded". Wallace's producers may have edited out strong comments.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 07:03 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Mjim at February 08, 2010 07:04 AM (V8B//)
When I brought this up, I got attacked. I was like what? calling me a "concern troll" me??? I knew it wouldn't go away so I posted it on here the minute I heard about it. And I said, that it would be typical of Sarah Palin if it said "don't forget to call the kids and tell them to take the laundry out of the dryer and fold it". the more I think about this, the more I think Sarah did this to make them go nuts, on purpose.
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 07:05 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 11:03 AM (QrA9E)
I overheard a brief bit on F&F this morning in which they characterized her speech Saturday night and her interview with Wallace as "feisty," though having not seen either I'll defer to you. I would love to see her get in their grills but with a smile on her face, same as what Liz Cheney has been doing recently. Also Michelle Bachmann.
Come to think of it, it seem like the only high profile Republicans with balls are women.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 08, 2010 07:15 AM (sXLx/)
"Come to think of it, it seem like the only high profile Republicans with balls are women.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 08, 2010 11:15 AM (sXLx/)"
Once you've survived being a 7th grade girl in an American Middle School, it all pales in comparison.
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 07:28 AM (p302b)
I only watched the "highlights" of the TP speech from other sites. I watched the first 5 minutes of the Wallace interview and turned it off because it made me mad.
It may have got better in the end, but I trust very little that comes out of F&F in the morning. They lean too far to the left.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 07:28 AM (QrA9E)
Once you've survived being a 7th grade girl in an American Middle School, it all pales in comparison.
Ah come on, it can't have degenerated that much! Not to the level of "politics".
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 07:30 AM (QrA9E)
vic, you need to watch some of the "reality" programming geared towards middle schoolers and younger. It has gotten to the point of "politics". Heck kindergarten is politics.
Posted by: curious at February 08, 2010 07:32 AM (p302b)
Arrrgggg, I have to see the jug-eared jackass every time I turn on Fox. Do I have to watch fake "reality TV" as well?
I think I would go crazy.
LOL, trying to remember my 7th grade but it was about 50 years ago. Can't remember back that far.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 07:41 AM (QrA9E)
Two big questions here: How was this shit bag able to win the primary to begin with and who pays for the IL primaries?
This turd could have only won the primary with the complicit aid of the "free press". Just like Obama they his the sins and promoted the wonderfulness of the commiecrat.
The way Scott Lee Cohen won the Illinois democrat primary for Lt. Gov was brilliant and simple. He was a nobody that nobody knew, and almost nobody bothered to check out either the guy or his credentials. Mark Brown, a columnist for the Sun-Times, actually did do an opinion piece on Cohen last year, and did mention the hooker girlfriend takedown with a knife and some of the other fun facts about our guy Scottie, but the powers that be deemed him unworthy of notice. Ha.
Scott Lee Cohen used $2 million of his money (he runs pawnshops) to buy TV and radio spots. The spots were simple. Each commercial featured 3 ordinary citizens, reciting the same script: "Hi I'm so and so, I needed a job, and Scott Lee Cohen held a job fair and found me a job. Thank you Scott Lee Cohen! That's why I'm voting for Scott Lee Cohen. He held a job fair and found me a job."
That was it. Three people, saying those words, playing over and over and over every time you got in your car & turned on the radio, or turned on the TV. The visuals were great for TV, Scottie cleans up okay, looks presentable in his suit and tie, and these were ordinary citizens giving their full names and thanking him for getting them a job.
The other two main candidates for the Lt. Gov position were dem machine hacks. This guy was fresh and clean and new and promised jobs, which is what people want and need right now.
Illinois primaries are paid for at the county level of government. Local governments are cash strapped right now, I don't see them clamoring for a re-vote. I heard on the radio this morning that the dems are considering putting Dan Hynes in the Lt. Gov spot. He's the guy who just lost the Gov primary to Gov Pat Quinn by less than 10,000 votes statewide, which is pretty close.
Considering the bad blood between those two right now, I'd get a food taster if I were Pat Quinn.
Posted by: Boots at February 08, 2010 07:41 AM (06JTY)
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 07:42 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 07:45 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 08, 2010 07:48 AM (REHQK)
Well that would be interesting, having Quinn and Hynes together...
Vic, the counties would let them do that due to money concerns, which in this state the Dems bank on.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 08, 2010 07:59 AM (5/yRG)
Vic, I'm not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV, but from living a lifetime here in Illinois I can tell you that the parties DO pick their fav candidate once a candidate drops off the ticket. That's how Illinois ended up with Alan Keyes from (Maryland? Delaware? someplace out east) as the republican candidate for the US Senate back in 2004.
Jack Ryan, husband of Jeri Ryan the actress, had won the Illinois republican primary. Then the Obama goons got busy and got the Chicago Tribune to demand the Ryans' sealed divorce records be opened up. In those divorce records there were allegations by Jeri Ryan that Jack took her to sex clubs in Paris and wanted to treat her like "the chicken" in public among other juicy tidbits. Ryan eventually dropped out of the race & the republicans picked Keyes. They tried to get Mike Ditka of Chicago Bears fame but he declined.
At that point the Obama machine had already chewed up and spit out Obama's democrat rivals during the primary. Blair Hull was actually polling ahead of Obama, so the goons got busy and got his divorce records opened up. Hull 's ex-wife had accused him of beating her. Hmmm......what do wives and girlfriends of Illinois politicians see in these guys, besides getting the crap kicked out of them?
Posted by: Boots at February 08, 2010 08:00 AM (06JTY)
Posted by: Boots at February 08, 2010 08:05 AM (06JTY)
The last thing I saw on that subject was in a book I checked out from the library. It said that the "experts" said 5 pounds of 95% enriched to make a weapons grade device capable of a detonation.
20% would most likely do nothing more than make a "fizzle" that polluted the area. Especially if done by some third world shithole like Iran.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 11:00 AM (QrA9E)
That is critical mass. You can reach critical mass with less enrichment.
Little Boy's 64 kilograms of Uranium was only 80 percent enriched. I think Fat Man's plutonium core was only a couple of kilograms.
20 percent enriched Uranium would have a critical mass of several hundred kilograms.
Posted by: Holger at February 08, 2010 08:10 AM (8NGHm)
Well I suspect then that the "parties" are in colusion in IL and they totally own the primary process without even having to pay for it.
There was a court case here a few years ago in which someone challenged something one of the parties (don't remember which one it was) and the court ruled that the primary process was totally owned by the party. The party paid for the primary in its entirety. The only thing the State did was provide the normal polling places for voting.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 08:10 AM (QrA9E)
While I'm doubling down on the subject of the politics of stupidity Illinois-style, a comment about the republicans at the top of the republican ticket. State Senator Bill Brady won on election night, and has declared victory, but his opponent State Sen Kirk Dillard refuses to concede. There were about 400 votes separating them the last I checked, but Dillard refuses to admit the obvious and get behind Brady.
The republicans could be making major gains right now among the electorate, touting their cleaner credentials (nobody in IL politics is clean, some are just less dirty than others). But no, this idiot Dillard is throwing a hissy fit and demanding that the votes be found to make him the winner. Whiner.
This is the same Kirk Dillard who is BFF with Barack Obama, and who starred in an Obama TV commercial in the presidential race of 2008. What kind of idiot republican would shun his own guy McCain in order to endorse the democrat Obama!!!!! Dillard is a tool and just mucking it up for Brady and the republicans.
Posted by: Boots at February 08, 2010 08:16 AM (06JTY)
20 percent enriched Uranium would have a critical mass of several hundred kilograms.
Critical mass is determined by a lot more than mass and enrichment. It takes a lot of extreemly sophisticated design to produce a runaway fission process in low enrichment or low weight. 20% is low enrichment.
My area of expertise is not in weapons design, but I do not think 20% will support a weapon detonation. Especially for someone like Iran.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2010 08:18 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: camel cig at August 13, 2010 12:33 AM (6ajE3)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2242 seconds, 363 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: David in San Diego at February 07, 2010 07:14 PM (GF+6V)